designing the future perfect: developing a temporal understanding of the intentionality and...
TRANSCRIPT
Córais Faisnéise BainistíochtaManagement Information Systems
Designing the Future Perfect: Developing a temporal understanding of the intentionality and generativity of organisational practices
Dr Niamh O Riordan Lecturer in Information Systems and OrganisationUniversity College Dublin
Quadrangular Conference14th September, 2015
Agenda
• A history of the present• And a dual core focus• An ulterior motive• A beginning• A middle• An end, an ending
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
A history of the present
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
(Metaphysics of) Cyberspace
(Nature of) Technology
(Temporality of) Being
And the end and the beginning were always thereBefore the beginning and after the end.
And all is always now
- T.S. Eliot
And a dual core focus
Can an instantaneous cube exist?
… and Temporality
chronosfungible v epochal time
polychronicityreal time
past - present - future
temporal schematavelocitykairos
chronometry future orientation
synchronisationmulti-taskingtime pressure
linear v iterative
duration
pluritemporalism
timelinessmonochronicity
rhythms
sociotemporalityabsolute v relative
objective v subjective
time-span of discretion
temporal decision-making biasesentrainment
(digitally mediated) Being… Do avatars dream of electric sheep?
know
ing in
prac
tice
embodiment
materiality
perfo
rmati
vity
process orientedintra-action
(auto)ethnographicgenerativity
identity
Being-in-
the-(virtual)
world
procedural
schemata
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
An ulterior motive
• SM research focuses on the processual, relational and emergentist entanglement of matter and meaning
• The sociomatierality proposed by Orlikowski and Scott (2008) is based on Barad’s (1998, 2003, 2007) agential realism which
“makes a distinctive move away from seeing actors and objects as primarily self-contained entities that influence each other...away from discrete entities of people and technology...to composite and shifting assemblages” (Orlikowski and Scott 2008, p. 455)
• I really like this idea of intra-action over inter-action– But there is a need to develop new ways to express AR arguments– And there is a big danger we’ll fall into the Tempo Trap
• This work is about distinguishing and recommending a SM view of temporality that’s based on the axis of intention over the axis of succession
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
Intra-action over inter-action!
A beginning
• Time: a non-spatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future - Ancona et al, 2001, p. 513
• The temporality of human life differs from the temporality of other beings or objects in that we direct ourselves toward intended futures according to our perception of things of the present moment and yet are bound by the past and our recollection of it (Bluedorn, 2002)– Our capacity to unravel the enigma of time remains limited because
our consciousness moves along it (Wells, 1895, p. 6): its greatest paradox is that even as the past is gone and the future yet to come, they both exist in the present moment for us
– Conceptualisations of time in organisational studies, and in the natural/social sciences more generally, have long been dominated by a narrower view of time, commonly described as objective time, external time, linear time or clock time even though organisational researchers are fundamentally interested in better understanding the intentful interactions of organisational actors
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
Organisational theorists rarely question or make explicit the casual logics used to build theories which frequently assume that for A to have caused B, A must have occurred prior to B
A middle
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
The temporality of Being, which Jacques (1988) describes as the temporal axis of succession, relates time to the sense of passing time expressed in successive readings of the clock.
This aspect of time is inherited from Parmenides, who held that things are; Being is and will remain so; all can be known and all is certain. It has an affinity with the natural sciences and is exclusively associated with our ideas of earlier and later, before and after, temporal discontinuity and atomism, constancy and permanence (Jaques, 1988, p. xii).
The temporality of Becoming, which Jaques (1988) describes as the temporal axis of intention, relates time to the experience of purposive, intentional, goal-directed behaviour and is concerned with the flux time in which future, present and past do seem to flow from one to the other (Jaques, 1988, p. 13).
This aspect of time is inherited from Heraclitus, who held that all is f lowing, changing, transforming, never still, opposite becoming opposite, the only reality being the reality of Becoming itself. It has an affinity with the social sciences and is exclusively associated with our ideas of past, preesnt and future, passage and direction, flux and change, durée and continuity (Jaques, 1988, p. xii)
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
An end, an ending…
• The world of everyday life “has its own standard time which is intersubjectively available” (Berger and Luckmann, 1966, p. 40) and practices exist “in the temporal dimension of the urgency of engagement” and cannot survive in the reversible universe of rules and formal logic” (Nicolini, 2012, p. 63)
• Researchers are fundamentally interested in better understanding the intentful interactions of organisational actors but even though time directly impacts the what, how, and why elements of a theory (George and Jones, 2000, p. 658), science has a time which is not that of practice (Bordieu, 1977, p. 9)
• The past, present and future are always with us: we bring our background to new situations and our actions are based on future imaginings or projections (Bergson). In this sense at least, the future is the source of the past: ‘we are [what] we were, and we will be what we receive and appropriate from what we were’… my past gets its meaning from me only from my projection of a future (Heidegger according to Polt, 1999, p. 96).
So how do we design the Future Perfect?Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
Management Information Systems Córais Faisnéise BainistíochtaManagement Information Systems Córais Faisnéise Bainistíochta
The Philosophy of Time
http://youtu.be/o4xVOi8cHt0
A theory, B theory and McTaggary’s Paradox
http://youtu.be/iB7xZR-1L5M
The reversibility of time
http://youtu.be/4XybFYCt3OY