designing public services for the 21st century
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Designing Public Services for the 21st Century
1/3
DesigningPublicServicesforthe21stCentury
1
DesigningPublicServicesforthe21st
Century
Introduction
ThehistoryofpublicservicereformintheUKisdominatedbylarge-scalestructural
reformsandattemptsatdrivingserviceefficiencyandimprovementfromthecentre.
Butdespite theconsiderable time andeffortexpended onreform,thedesignand
approach of public serviceshas remained remarkably similar in many respects to
whatwasestablishedbytheradicalinnovatorsof1940spost-warBritain.Overthe
pastsixtyyears,theBritishwelfarestatehashadsignificantsuccessinincreasingthe
health,prosperityandopportunitiesofcitizensand intransformingBritish society.
Butinordertosolvecomplexsocialproblemsandmatchthescaleofthechallenges
ofthetwenty-firstcentury,publicservicesmustbetransformed.i
Thegyroscopeofpublicservices
Thesupportthatpeopleneedoftensitsinthegapsbetweentraditionalservices,but
citizens arecurrentlyfacedwitha fragmented arrayof services thatdonotmake
sensetothemortheirlives,andwhichtreatthemaspassiveconsumers.
Vertical funding streams, lines of accountability and performance management
systemsencourage publicservantsatall levels to focusondeliveringoutputsand
meetingtargetswithintheirnarrowlydefinedarea.Theresultingfragmentationand
duplication undermines and damages the relationships between services and
citizens,whicharecrucialtotacklingcomplexproblems.Somecitizensandfamilies
canbethetargetofhundredsof interventionsayearwhichtheybecomeskilledat
deflecting; a family in Suffolk, for example, received 700 interventions in an 18
monthperiod from justtwoagencies (the council andpolice).Thisissuehasbeen
likenedtoagyroscope:
Ontheoutsideofthefamilyisalltheactivityof thesystemandonthe
inside nothing moves or changes. The activity of the system actually
createsabarriertochangeforthefamilies.ii
Preventingprevention
Despite this activity, there are gaps in support that mean problems can go
unidentifiedoruntreated.Publicservicesareoftentargetedatmajorlifeevents(e.g.
birth,illness,lossofemployment,etc.)butofferlimitedsupportinbetween.
Therearemany exampleswhereprovidingcitizensandfamilieswith low intensityandholisticsupportat anearly stagecouldavoid theneed forhigh intensity (and
-
8/8/2019 Designing Public Services for the 21st Century
2/3
DesigningPublicServicesforthe21stCentury
2
expensive)interventionsatalaterstage.Forexample,fillingthegapin supportfor
familiesbetweenachildsbirthandtheirfirstdayatschoolcouldsignificantlyboost
their life chances. But the fragmentation of public service management systems
meansthatpublicagenciesarenotincentivisedtospendresourcesonpreventionor
earlyintervention.
As a result, public servants are often restricted to managing the symptoms of
problems,ratherthanbuildingcapability.Soeachagencyorprofessionalworkshard
totackleproblemsintheirnarrowlydefinedarea,buttheirunderlyingcausesremain
untouched,meaningsocialproblemspersistandareinheritedbyfuturegenerations.
Asaseniormanagerwithinalocalauthoritycommented,herlocalityhadbecome:
goodatservices,butnotsolutions.
Thehuman,socialandfinancialcostsoffailingtobuildthesecapabilitiesanddealing
withtheresultantproblemsarehuge.TheNewEconomicsFoundation,forexample,
estimatedthat:Thecostsofdoingnothingtoimprovesocialproblemsin
theUKoverthenext20yearswouldbealmost4trillion.iii
Reorientingpublicservices
Inthecontextofeverincreasingdemandsonpublicservices,tobeeffectiveservice
providers must adopt a doing yourself out of business approach, whereby
they build the participation, capabilities and networks of citizens, families and
communitiesinorderthattheyarelessreliantonpublicservicesandhighcostneedsareprevented.Incurrentpoliticalterms,publicservicesneedtohelpbuildtheBig
Society.
Thisimpliesandrequiresareorientationofservicesintworespects:
Firstly, it implies a new relationship between public services and citizens,where
servicesaredesignedwithcitizensandfromtheirperspective.Thisrepresentsan
expanded view of a citizen: they are not passive customers, but activists, with
knowledgeandresourcesoftheirown.
Public administration and services in the 20
th Century were dominated by large
institutionsandpowerfulprofessionalgroups.Groupingknowledgeandexpertisein
thiswayhadanumberofbenefitsinapre-internetage.Butinturnitmeantcitizens
hadlittleinvolvementindecision-making(beyondtheballotbox)andwerepassive
(ratherthanactive)recipientsofservices.
Personal and human relationships with public servants are vital to peoples
experiences ofand the success of public services. Yet thesequalities have been
undervaluedbyprofessionalgroupsandreformerswhoinsteadencouragedparent-
childandproducer-consumerrelationships.Abalancedandproductiverelationshipwith publicservantscanunlockandenhancethe insights, motivation,capabilities,
-
8/8/2019 Designing Public Services for the 21st Century
3/3
DesigningPublicServicesforthe21stCentury
3
andnetworksofcitizensandcommunities,whichcaninturnboostsocialresilienceiv,
achievegreaterpublicvaluevandcatalyseinnovation
vi.
Secondly, it implies a change of focus for public services, from managing the
symptomsofsocialproblemstodealingwiththeir underlying causesandbuilding
socialresilience.Byworkingwithcitizens,familiesandcommunitiestodeveloptheir
participation, capabilities and networks, evidence suggests that problems can be
prevented, peoples independence increased, deeply ingrained social problems
overcomeandsignificantlybetteroutcomesachieved.vii
Conclusion
There is no doubt that public services provide invaluable support to millions of
peopleeveryday, helpedbytheir incremental improvementover recentdecades.
Butiftheyaretomeetthechallengesofthetwenty-firstcenturyitisvitalthatthe
assumptions thatunderpin existing systems andservicesarereconsidered; topof
thelistshouldbetheirrelationshipwithcitizensandtheirfocus.Inthecontextof
large scalebudget cuts but rising demand, the reorientationof public services in
theserespectspresentsasignificantopportunitytoachievebetterpublicvaluewith
lesspublicresource.
TimHughes
December2010iSeepp.18-20,2020PublicServicesTrust(2010)Fromsocialsecuritytosocialproductivity:avisionfor2020PublicServices.
iip.8,Participle(2009)TheSwindonFamilyLIFEProgramme:Report
iiinef(2009)BackingtheFuture:whyinvestinginchildrenisgoodforusall
ivRowson,J;Broome,S;Jones,A.(2010)ConnectedCommunities:HowsocialnetworkspowerandsustaintheBigSociety;
Maddock,S&Hallam,S.(2010)RecoveryBeginswithHope;YoungFoundation(2009)SinkingandSwimming;Edwards,C
(2009)ResilientNation;&Halpern,D(2010)TheHiddenWealthofNations.
v2020PublicServiceTrust(2010)FromSocialSecuritytoSocialProductivity;Bunt,L&Harris,M.(2009)TheHumanFactor;
Boyle,D;Slay,J;&Stephens,L.(2010)PublicServicesInsideOut.
viBoyle,D&Harris,M.(2010)TheChallengeofCo-Production.Gillinson,S;Horne,M;&Baeck,P.(2010)RadicalEfficiency;
Bunt,L;Harris,M;&Westlake,S.(2010)SchumpeterComestoWhitehall;Bunt,L&Harris,M.(2010)MassLocalism
viiRowson,J;Broome,S;Jones,A.(2010)ConnectedCommunities:HowsocialnetworkspowerandsustaintheBigSociety;
Maddock,S&Hallam,S.(2010)RecoveryBeginswithHope;YoungFoundation(2009)SinkingandSwimming;Edwards,C
(2009)ResilientNation;Bunt,L&Harris,M.(2009)TheHumanFactor;&Halpern,D(2010)TheHiddenWealthofNations.