design of low-power silicon articulated microrobots richard yeh & kristofer s. j. pister...

23
Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots

Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister

Presented by:

Shrenik Diwanji

Page 2: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Abstract

To design and build a class of autonomous, low power silicon articulated micro-robots fabricated on a 1 cm2 silicon die and mounted with actuators, a controller and a solar array.

Page 3: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Designing

Primarily based on micro-machining Pros

Feature sizes in sub micronMass production

ConsDesigning from scratch

Page 4: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Basic model of the micro-robot.

Page 5: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Actuator Design

Main backbone of the robot designShould have high W/kg3 ratioDifferent types of actuators:-

Piezoelectric Thermal and shape-memory alloy Electromagnetic Electrostatic

Page 6: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Piezoelectric actuators

Pros Produce large force Require low power

Cons Require high voltage ~ 100v. difficult to integrate with CMOS electronics

Page 7: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Thermal and Shape-memory alloy actuators

Pros Robust Easy to operate

Cons High current dissipation ( 10s of mA)

Page 8: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Electromagnetic actuators

Pros High Energy Density

Cons Needs external magnet and / or high

currents to generate high magnetic fields

Page 9: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Electrostatic actuators

Pros Low power dissipation. Can be designed to dissipate no power

while exerting a force. High power density at micro scale. Easy to fabricate.

Page 10: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Electrostatic actuator design

Gap Contraction Actuator

_ 1Et l v2

2 d2Fe =

Page 11: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Scaling EffectsActuator force

Frequency

Dissipative forceGravitational force

Squeeze-film damping

Resistance of spring support

Power density

Page 12: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Inch Worm Motors.

Design of Inch Worm Motors

Inch Worm Cycle

Page 13: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Prototype design and working

Page 14: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Power requirements

Main areas of power dissipation CMOS controller Actuators

Power dissipation in actuators Weight - 0.5mN Adhesion force - 100µN

C = Total capacitanceF = frequency

Page 15: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Designing Articulated Rigid Links

Shape of the links Flat links

Cons Less strength due to 2 thin poly crystalline layers

HTB Pros

Good weight bearing capacity

Page 16: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Mounting of the solar array and the chip

Designing Articulated Rigid Links

Page 17: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Mechanical Coupling of the legs

Page 18: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Power Source Solar array is used η = 10 % ( max 26%) Power density = 10mW/cm2 (100 mw/cm2, η = 26%)

Page 19: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Controller

Open loop control (as no sensors)CMOS controller

Simple finite state machine Clock generator Charge pump

Page 20: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Logic behind walking of the Robot

Page 21: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Gait speed

Gait speed = Δx/T In one leg cycle

Δx = 100μm

T = 15 ms.

With GCA to leg displacement factor of 1:10 GCA gap – stop size of 2μm. Operating frequency of 1kHz.

Gait Speed = 100/15 = 7mm/s

Page 22: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Robot assembly

Difficulty The size of the robot The strength needed for perfect

mechanical couplingSolution

Flip chip bonding Allows the micro machined devices to be

transferred from substrate to another.

Page 23: Design of Low-Power Silicon Articulated Microrobots Richard Yeh & Kristofer S. J. Pister Presented by: Shrenik Diwanji

Conclusion

Key design issues Actuation power density Actuators used

Key tools Micro machining