design and simulation of 5g 28-ghz phased array ... · design and simulation of 5g 28-ghz phased...

104
Design and Simulation of 5G 28-GHz Phased Array Transceiver Webcast System / Circuit / EM Co-simulation with beam steering Jack Sifri MMIC/Module Design Flow Specialist © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2013

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2019

41 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Design and Simulation of 5G 28-GHz Phased Array Transceiver WebcastSystem / Circuit / EM Co-simulation with beam steering

Jack Sifri

MMIC/Module Design

Flow Specialist

© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2013

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Introduction

• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?

• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication

• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

• 28GHz is one of the several candidate bands for the new 5G

radio interface. Verizon has chosen 28 GHz for their pre-5G trial.

2

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Agenda

• EM/Circuit Co-simulation / demo

• Transmit Chain components

• Design and Simulation

• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation

• Analysis

• Transceiver Design Example

• Future work

• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in ADS 2017

3

PagePage 4

EM / Circuit Cosimulation

Antenna and other

physical structures

Momentum Planar EM

Full 3D FEM Simulation

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 4

PagePage 5

EM / Circuit Cosimulation

Antenna and other

physical structures

Momentum Planar EM

Full 3D FEM Simulation

+

Transceiver Components

Circuit level designs; X-parameter

models, EM models, etc.

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 5

HB, S-Par, Envelope, Tran, DC, AC

PagePage 6

EM / Circuit Cosimulation

Antenna and other

physical structures

Momentum Planar EM

Full 3D FEM Simulation

+

Transceiver Components

Circuit level designs; X-parameter

models, EM models, etc.

=

Complete EM / Circuit

Simulation and Analysis

Captures the excitation from

the T/R module and apply it

to the Antenna(s)

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 6

HB, S-Par, Envelope, Tran, DC, AC

The output from the circuit

simulation drives/excites the

Antenna ports

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

28 GHz Transmit Chain with Patch AntennaSystem / Circuit / EM Co-simulation and beam steering

7

Demo

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Transmit Chain with Patch AntennaSystem / Circuit / EM Co-simulation and beam steering

Plextek RFI Buffer AmpPlextek RFI PAPower Divider

4X4 Array .5 Lambda

Patch Antenna28 GHz BPF

Phase Shifter

8

Page

28 GHz Power Divider

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

9

Power Divider

Designed with:

TriQuint PHEMT process

9

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Mm-Wave Small Signal Amps

mm-Wave small signal Amp

Designed with:

TriQuint PHEMT process

10

Page

28 GHz Filter Response

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

28 GHz BPF

11

Page

Mm-Wave Power Amplifier

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

12

Plextek RFI PA

X-Parameter model

Designed with:

GCS InP_DHBT Process

12

Global Communications Semiconductors

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

X-Parameters

• Accurately captures all non-linearties

• Protects your IP

• Much faster simulation speed and trade-off analysis in hierarchical

system design and verification.

• Accurate load pull modeling capability

Circuit Topology

X-parameter Model

13

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

X-Parameters

Overlaid Results

Model (Red) Vs. Circuit (Blue)

14

Page

Mm-Wave Power Amplifier

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

15

Plextek RFI PA

X-Parameter model

Designed with:

GCS InP_DHBT Process

Circuit Sim – Red

X-Par model – Blue

Pin / Pout and Phase Response of PA

15

Page

Creating 16 X-Par models of Varied Pout and Phase

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

0 degrees

16

Page

Using a Four Bit Phase Shifter (with 22.5 degree phase increments)

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Designed with:

TriQuint PHEMT process

22.5 deg

45 deg

90 deg

180 deg

17

Page

Calculating Phase Shifter Phase Error

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

When circuit 1 is “ON”, circuit 2 is “OFF”

When circuit 1 is “OFF”, circuit 2 is “ON”

+5

- 5 +5

- 5

22.5 deg 22.5 deg

18

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

SS_Gain = 32.75 dB

LS_Gain = 31.65 dB @ Pin = -3 dBm (Pout = 28.65 dBm)

LS_Gain = 29.44 dB @ Pin = 1 dBm (Pout = 30.44 dBm)

Circuit level designs

HB Analysis

P -1dB = 28.65 dBm

@ Pin -3 dBm

19

Page

HB Analysis

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

SS_Gain = 40 dB

LS_Gain = 38.8 dB @ Pin = -10 dBm (Pout = 28.8 dBm)

LS_Gain = 37.2 dB @ Pin = -7 dBm (Pout = 30.2 dBm)

Behavioral level designs

P -1dB = 28.8 dBm

@ Pin -10 dBm

20

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Patch Antenna Design

4.8 mm

3.2

8 m

m

1.14 mm

0.84 mm

0.5

8

mm

0.84 mm

Er=2.2 TanD=.0009H=.794 mm

21

Page

Antenna Array configurations

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

0 degrees

CircularUniform Rect. 3D/ConformalTriangularUniform Linear

22

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Patch Antenna Design (4X4 array – ½ Lambda)

23

Page

Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

24

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

The main beam always points in the

direction of the increasing phase

shift.

Well, if the signal to be radiated is

delivered through an electronic

phase shifter giving a continuous

phase shift now, the beam direction

will be electronically adjustable.

However, this cannot be extended

unlimitedly. The highest value,

which can be achieved for the

Field of View (FOV) of a phased

array antenna, is 120° (60° left and

60° right). With the sine theorem the

necessary phase moving can be

calculated.

24

Page

Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

25

The phase shift Δφ between two

successive elements is constant

and is called phase-increment.

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

25

Page

Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

26

Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle

61.5 degrees 20 degrees

31.2 10

22.5 7.2

26

Page

Sweeping the Phase Shifter for Different Look-up Angles

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle

61.5 degrees 20 degrees

31.2 10

22.5 7.2

27

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

0 degreesAntenna incremental

look-up angle = 7.2

degrees

0 degrees

28

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Antenna incremental

look-up angle = 7.2

degrees

7.2 degrees

29

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Antenna incremental

look-up angle = 7.2

degrees

14.4 degrees

30

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

21.6 degrees

31

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

28.8 degrees

32

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

36.0 degrees

33

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

43.2 degrees

34

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

50.4 degrees

35

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

57.6 degrees

The highest value, which

can be achieved for the

Field of View (FOV) of a

phased array antenna, is

120° (60° left and 60° right).

-57.6 degrees

36

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 50.4 degrees

37

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 43.2 degrees

38

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 36.0 degrees

39

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 28.8 degrees

40

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 21.6 degrees

41

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 14.4 degrees

42

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

- 7.2 degrees

43

Page

Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

0 degrees

44

Page

Harmonic Balance - Sweep Pin for each state

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

0 degrees

45

Swept power for each phase state

Page

Multi Band Systems

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

For Multi Band

Systems, select

the channel

frequency and

sweep the phase

46

Page

EM Circuit Excitation for Multi Band Systems

© Keysight

Technologies 2017Page 47

0 degrees

Page

EM Circuit Excitation for Multi Band Systems

© Keysight

Technologies 2017Page 48

0 degrees

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017 49

Switched Beam Systems and Isolation

Page

Four Channel Switched Beam System

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 50

28 GHz

28 GHz

28 GHz

28 GHz

Antenna 4

Antenna 3

Antenna 2

Antenna 1

Switch

Page

SP4T Pin Diode Switch

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

32 - 38 dB

isolation

< - 20 dB Return Loss

OnOffOffOff

51

Page

Effect of Isolation with SP4T Pin Diode SwitchGood isolation; low leakage

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 52

Antenna 2 (OFF)Antenna 1 (ON)

30.73 dBm

30.14 dBm

- .43 dBm

- 1.02 dBm

Page

Modeling the Switch in ADS

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 53

>30 dB isolation

Page

Using a Switch with 35 dB IsolationGood isolation; low leakage

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 54

Antenna 2Antenna 1

29.91 dBm

29.32 dBm

- 2.46 dBm

- 3.06 dBm

Good isolation

Page

Using a Switch with 20 dB IsolationBad isolation; high leakage

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 55

Antenna 2Antenna 1

29.91 dBm

29.32 dBm

12.54 dBm

11.95 dBm

Bad isolation

Page

Using a Switch with 10 dB IsolationVery bad isolation; very high leakage

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 56

Antenna 2Antenna 1

29.89 dBm

29.31 dBm

22.54 dBm

21.95 dBm

Very bad isolation

Good isolation is important to have in components

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

5G Verification Test benches (VTB) in ADS

57

VTB is a regular component in the ADS simulation environment,

which is linked to the Verification Test Bench (VTB) in SystemVue.

VTBs enable circuit designers to make use of sources and

measurement setups from SystemVue and verify the performance of

a circuit using real world complex modulated signals conforming to

advanced wireless standards such as 2G/3G/4G/5G.

Page

5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Note: OFDM is the technology that has been selected by 3GPP rather than FBMC.

ADS 2017 plans to include this update. The VTB flow is the same.

58

Page

Pin = -50 dBm

SS Gain = 49 dB

5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB

59

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Pin = -25 dBm SS Gain = 49 dB

LS Gain = 47.8 dB; 1.2 dB compressed

5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB

60

Page

Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

61

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 62

Page

Effect of Feeding Network and Line Lengths

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Slide is taken from Dr. Gabriel Rebeiz’s

RFIC Symposium Plenary talk, June 2017

63

Page

System with identical PA’s and No Interconnect LinesNo added phase

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

To

Antenna

64

Page

System with identical PA’s and No Interconnect LinesNo added phase

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase Shift = 0 deg

Side lobe 14.33 dB down

Null 34.9 dB down

65

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Adding Short Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna

66

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase Shift = 0 deg

Adding Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna mm

Side lobe 8.93 dB down (14.33 with no lines)

Null 18.75 dB down (34.9 with no lines)

67

Phase Shift = 0 deg

5 deg

shift

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase Shift = 0 deg

Adding Longer Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna

Side lobe 10.63 dB down (14.33 with no lines)

Null 24.73 dB down (34.9 with no lines)

68

Phase Shift = 0 deg

28 deg

offset

3, 5, 7, 9 mm

Page

Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 69

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Lobe is 14.56 dB down

Null is 36.26 dB down

Lobe is 11.04 dB down

Null is at 35.89 dB down

Phase= 62Phase=0

Case 1 – Using Identical PA’s

70

Page

X-Parameters of Various PA’s with Varied Amplitude and Phase

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 71

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase= 62Phase=0

Lobe is 12.813 dB down

Null is at 24.76 dB down

Lobe is 10.96 dB down

Null is at 24.28 dB down

Case 2 – Using Different PA’s

Compared with the case of identical PA’s

Lobe is 14.56 dB down

Null is 36.26 dB down

72

Page

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

With Different PA’sWith Identical PA’s

Lobe is 14.56 dB down

Null is 36.26 dB downLobe is 12.81 dB down

Null is 24.76 dB down

Summary: Response Using Identical PA’s Vs Different PA’s

73

Page

Important to Design Circuits with Small Variability

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

PA 1 Wide variation Smaller variation

Phase

Phase

PA 2

74

Page

Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 75

Page

Coupling / Crosstalk between:

• Adjacent Channels

• PA’s

• Antenna elements

• Feed Lines and Antenna elements

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 76

Page

Response with No Coupling

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 77

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Response with No Coupling @ 0deg

Lobe is 14.53 dB down

Null is 35.94 dB down

78

Page

Response with Coupling

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 79

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Response with Coupling 0deg

Lobe is 11.73 dB down

Null is 19.29 dB down

Compared with the case of no coupling

Lobe is 14.53 dB down

Null is 35.94 dB down

80

Page

Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Loading and Change in Impedance

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 81

Page

Effect of scan angle

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

As scan angle increases :

– Effective cross-section area “A” of the array

decreases

• Less power to main lobe (lower peak gain)

• Less directivity (wider beam)

– PA loading & impedance changes

• Affects the final beam shape

• In extreme cases can create blind

spots

– More energy goes to side lobes (“grating

lobes”)

Watch out for unexpected interference

(pilot tones, jamming) and false echoes

(clutter) coming from unwanted directions

Q=45o

Q=0o

82

Page

Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

From:

An Introduction to Phased Array Design

A Technical Note by N. Tucker

15/04/2011

83

Page

Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with AntennaPhased Array system Architecture exploration

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

NumCols=8NumRows=8

Mode=SubArray

InsertionLoss=1 dBArraySplit1 {ArraySplit}

Tx

Rx

MainCarrierIndex=1

Phase=0 °Freq=2 GHz [Freq]

RxTx=TxArrayPort1 {ArrayPort}

Circuit_Link

Port_2Port_1

DesignName=XParamAmp

Subnetwork1 {Circuit_Link}

RxOutOrTxInMap=1RxInOrTxOutMap=2

DatasetName=HMC543ALC4B_sparm_25C_0.0.s2p

SParamSource=DataSetPhi=46 ° [myphi]

Theta=11 ° [mytheta]

CalcMode=AutoArrayPhase1 {ArrayPhase}

RxOutOrTxInMap=1RxInOrTxOutMap=2

DatasetName=HMC1019ALP4E_sparameters_deembedded_0.0p0dB.s…

SParamSource=DataSetNumBars=2

SideLobeLevel=-20 dB10

Window=TaylorArrayAttn1 {ArrayAttn}

RxTx=TxActiveLoading=Active Reflection Coefficients

ElementPatternFileName=D:\EMPROHOME\single_element_patter…ElementPatternType=Pattern FileDistanceY_in_Wavelengths=0.25

DistanceX_in_Wavelengths=0.25DistanceUnit=Wavelengths

NumElementsY=8NumElementsX=8

Configuration=Uniform Rectangular ArrayArrayAnt2 {ArrayAnt}

Source SplitterDigital

Attenuator

Digital

Phase

Shifter

AmplifierAntenna

Array

S-parametersMultiple

S-parameters

Multiple

S-parametersX-parameters Element patterns

Polarization

Coupling

Active impedance

1 8X8 8x8 8x8 8x8 8x8

84© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Page

Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Mild blind angles are observed here due to the active reflection coefficients and

accurate models for amplifiers, Phase shifters and attenuators

The simulation can further be enhanced if employed load pulled X-parameters.

85

Page

5G 28-GHz Phased Array

Transceiver0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 86

Page

Full Phased Array Transceiver

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Transmit Receive

87

LOS Link

10 Km

Page

SiGe BiCMOS Doherty Power Amplifier

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 88

Doherty PA

PA Output Power and Phase

Small Signal S-Parameters

Page

Transceiver Transmit Chain

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Phase

ShiftersAmps

PA’s Filters

Transmit Patch

Antenna

LOS Link

10 Km

89

Page

Transceiver Receive Chain

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

LNA’sPhase

Shifters Amps

2 Receive Antennas

Dipole & Patch

LOS Link

10 Km

90

Page

Transceiver

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Pin PA_in PA_out P_Antenna LNA_in LNA_out P_received

-10.3 dBm -4.65 dBm 20.4 dBm 16.8 dBm -76.8 dBm -34.7 dBm 11.3 dBm

P_Antenna 16.8 dBm

Antenna gain 14 dB

LNA_in -77 dBm108 dB Loss in the LOS Link

91

Page

Receiver Noise Figure

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Gain = 60 dB

S11 = -35 dB

S22 = -27 dB

NF = 3.5 dB

92

Page

Transmit Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for EVM

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 93

Page

Transmit Chain EVM

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 94

Page

Receive Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for BER

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 95

Page

Receive Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for BER

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 96

Page

Transceiver – Transmit Antenna

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 97

Page

Transceiver – Receive Antenna 1

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 98

Page

Transceiver – Receive Antenna 2

© Keysight

Technologies 2017 99

Page

Future Work

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

EM Excitation in ADS 2016

EM Excitation in ADS 2017

Includes Circuit Envelope

Allows bringing in modulated 5G sources

from system view to perform full 5G analysis

100

Page

Acknowledgement

© Keysight

Technologies 2017

I extend my sincere gratitude to the following people who have

helped me put this project material together:

• Anil Panday

• Plextek RFI

• Rupam Anand

Special Thanks to the following people who have provided me with

feedback and support

• Carmina Stremlau

• How-Siang Yap

• Murthy Upmaka

• Bhumit Rojivadia (Intern)

• Sangkyo Shin

101

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Conclusion

This webcast has demonstrated the importance of:

• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation

• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation

• Analysis

➢ Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

➢ Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

➢ Effect of Coupling and Crosstalk

➢ Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

• Transceiver Design Example

➢ Using Tower Jazz .18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

102

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017

Conclusion

This webcast has demonstrated the importance of:

• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation

• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation

• Analysis

➢ Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

➢ Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

➢ Effect of Coupling and Crosstalk

➢ Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

• Transceiver Design Example

➢ Using Tower Jazz .18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

103

Page© Keysight

Technologies 2017 104

– “How To” Video Series

– Application Focused

(10 min each)

– Free workspace

www.keysight.com/find/eesof-how-to-videos

http://www.keysight.com/find/mytrial.rfmw.wc