design & analysis of multistratum randomized experiments ching-shui cheng dec. 7, 2006
DESCRIPTION
Design & Analysis of Multistratum Randomized Experiments Ching-Shui Cheng Dec. 7, 2006 National Tsing Hua University. Randomization models for designs with simple orthogonal block structures. where are the treatment effects. has spectral form - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Design & Analysis of Multistratum Randomized Experiments
Ching-Shui Cheng
Dec. 7, 2006National Tsing Hua University
2
Randomization models for designs with simple orthogonal block structures
where are the treatment effects.
3
has spectral form
where is the orthogonal projection matrix onto theeigenspace of with eigenvalue
Each of these eignespaces is called a stratum.
4
Suppose (in which case does not contain treatment effects, and therefore measures variability among the experimental units)It can be shown that
th stratum variance
Null ANOVA
Ad-Watch SE Professional.lnk
5
6
Estimates computed in different strata are uncorrelated.
Estimate each treatment contrast in each of the strata in which it is estimable, and combine the uncorrelated estimates from different strata.
Simple analysis results when the treatment contrasts are estimable in only one stratum.
7
Designs such that falls entirely in one stratum arecalled orthogonal designs.
Examples:
Completely randomized designsRandomized complete block designsLatin squares
8
ANOVA table for an orthogonal design
9
Completely randomized design
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Block design (b/k)
18
19
Complete block designs
The two factors T and B satisfy the condition of proportional frequencies.
20
21
22
23
24
Three replications of 23
Treatment structure: 2*2*2
Block structure: 3/8
25
26
In general, there may be information for treatment contrastsin more than one stratum.
Analysis is still simple if the space of treatment contrasts can be decomposed as , where each ,consisting of treatment contrasts of interest, is entirely inone stratum.
Orthogonal designs
27
Blocks Block/((Sv/St/Sr)*Sw) 4/((3/2/3)*7) Treatments Var*Time*Rate*Weed 3*2*3*7
28
29
Factor [nvalues=504;levels=4] Block & [levels=3] Sv, Sr, Var, Rate & [levels=2] St, Time & [levels=7] Sw, WeedGenerate Block, Sv, St, Sr, SwMatrix [rows=4;columns=6; \values="b1 b2 Col St Sr Row"\1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,\0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0,\0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0,\1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1] CkeyAkey [blockfactor=Block,Sv,St,Sr,Sw; \Colprimes=!(2,2,3,2,3,7);Colmappings=!(1,1,2,3,4,5);Key=Ckey] Var, Time, Rate, WeedBlocks Block/((Sv/St/Sr)*Sw)Treatments Var*Time*Rate*WeedANOVA
30
Block stratum 3 Block.Sv stratumVar 2Residual 6 Block.Sw stratumWeed 6Residual 18
Block.Sv.St stratumTime 1Var.Time 2Residual 9
31
Block.Sv.Sw stratumVar.Weed 12Residual 36
Block.Sv.St.Sr stratumRate 2Var.Rate 4Time.Rate 2Var.Time.Rate 4Residual 36
32
Block.Sv.St.Sw stratumTime.Weed 6Var.Time.Weed 12Residual 54 Block.Sv.St.Sr.Sw stratumRate.Weed 12Var.Rate.Weed 24Time.Rate.Weed 12Var.Time.Rate. Weed 24Residual 216
Total 503
33
has spectral form
where is the orthogonal projection matrix onto theeigenspace of with eigenvalue
Each of these eignespaces is called a stratum.
34
Normal equation
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Incomplete block designs
42
43
Consider the model with fixed block effects:
To eliminate the nuisance parameters in , we need toproject onto :
44
The intrablock estimator of a treatment contrast is the sameas its least squares estimator under the model with fixed block effects.
45
is the orthogonal projection matrix onto
46
47
Balanced incomplete block designs (BIBD)
48
49
50
51
52
53
ANOVA table for a BIBD
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Recovery of interblock information
65
66
67
Non-orthogonal row-column designs
68
69
70
71
To eliminate the nuisance parameters in and ,project onto :
72
73
74
75
Youden square
76
77
78
79
80
Optimal block designs
81
82
83
84
85
Kiefer (1975)
86
87