department regarding financial summary operating …1e9156b6...2016/05/17 · improvement revolving...
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
3
4.
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGNew Ulm, Minnesota
City Hall Council Chambers
May 17, 2016 - 5: 00 P. M.
CONSENT:
a. Consider motion to receive and order filed the report from the Finance
Department regarding sales tax, lodging tax and building permits for theCity of New Ulm.
b. Consider motion to receive and order filed the report from FinanceDepartment regarding financial summary operating results through April2016.
PUBLIC HEARING:
a. Conduct Public Hearing and consider resolution approving the final plat ofthe Castle House Subdivision located at 16 and 20 South Broadway.
b. Conduct Public Hearing and consider resolution approving the use ofproperty tax abatement for the Laboratory Instrument Leasing, Inc. projectat 1126 North Front Street.
REPORTS FROM OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS:
a. From the Safety Commission:
1) Recommending establishing parallel parking on the east side ofNorth Broadway between
22nd
and23r
North Streets.
2) Recommending approving the proposed sharrow routes as
presented by Nathan Fuerst.
OLD BUSINESS:
a. Consider request from State Street Theater Company to accept
ownership of the 1938 Auditorium and take over operational and
maintenance costs of the building.
5. NEW BUSINESS:
a. Consider motion to schedule a joint City Council/ Public UtilitiesCommission information meeting to discuss the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 4:00 P. M.
b. Consider resolution allowing the request by John Dietz, Cottonwood
Properties to use public right-of-way for construction equipment parkingfor a period of time over 14 days, through June 30, 2016.
C. Consider resolution authorizing a Sidewalk Cafe to be located in front ofRodney's Tavern, 6 South Minnesota Street and extending the liquorlicense into the Sidewalk Cafe area.
d. Consider motion to review the request of Grand New Ulm LLC to reducethe 2016 Assessment.
e. Consider motion to review the request of Target Corporation to reduce the
assessed value of the 2016 pay 2017 tax year.
Consider resolution adopting a methodology to reassess the balance ofthe 2005 special assessments on the lots to be sold as tax forfeited landswithin the Lakeside Village Addition.
g. Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2020 payments of the General Obligation Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 20108, on September 1, 2016.
h. Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2018 payments of the General Obligation Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2008, on December 1, 2016.
Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2022 payments of the General Obligation ImprovementBonds, Series 2007, on September 1, 2016 and authorize $ 325,000 of
this bond to be refinanced with the General Obligation Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund Refunding Bonds, Series 2016.
Consider motion to receive and order filed the 2015 Survey of PublicServices and Performance Measurement report.
2
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 1 a
Agenda Section: Consent Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: No
Prepared By: Reg VorwerkOrdinance: No
Number of Attachments: One ( 1) Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item• Consider motion to receive and order filed the report from the Finance Department
regarding sales tax, lodging tax and building permits for the City ofNew Ulm.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by Second bypermits for the City of New Ulm.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
Indicators are positive.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: N/A
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
1. Graphs of identified indicators
to receive and order filed the report on sales tax, lodging tax and building
Sales Tax Collections
140, 000.00
120, 000.00
100, 000.00
80, 000.00
60, 000.00
40, 000.00
20, 000.00
CJac` aJaa', aa`
PQi` jai
1Jc¢ >JJ
7a 5¢ t1 PJ
y¢Qa¢ac O o,¢aaO¢c,¢F
Lodging Tax Collections
14, 000.00
12, 000.00
10, 000.00
8,000.00
6,000.00
4, 000.00
2, 000.00
Residential Building Permits5, 000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3, 500,000
3, 000,000
2, 500,000
2, 000,000
1, 500,000
1, 000,000
500,000
OL ¢ ¢
O¢
cJa aJaA "da`
PQa` a, JJ¢ JA
a01¢a
a 4el
PJ
y¢Q¢ yc po1o4¢ccO¢o¢ac
2014
2015
Q2016
2014
2015
2016
2014
2015
2016
Excise Tax
6, 000.00 ----"- --"--
5, 000.00 `-"-'-
4,000.00 --
3, 000.00 2014
2, 000.00 2015
1, 000.00 2016
r_
a c4 k c¢ \ 4oa oa as pQ b SJ lJ CJ v oo o 0
qac5¢,
oa QJ
Q¢ao O o°¢
F
y¢ t O
Vehicle Sales
300
250
200 -
150 2014
100 _ - - - 2015
201650 '
0
New Homes
7
4 y2014
2015
2M 2016
1
0
oa Ja ac pQ e4 J 1J pJ6°
Qaaacp
oaac ¢`ya t O
Commercial Building Permits30,000,000
25,000, 000
20,000, 000
15, 000,000
10,000,000
5, 000, 000
Jaa`1
Jac, aacpQi` aJ
Jc0 >J\A
QJS ¢( pb¢a b¢a b¢a
lacF¢•
pa
PJ Qa¢ O oJ¢ac ¢¢ acy¢ 2 O
2014
2015
2016
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 1 b
Agenda Section: Consent Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: n/ a
Prepared By: Reg VorwerkOrdinance: n/ a
Number of Attachments: 1 Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item• Consider motion to receive and order filed the report from Finance Department regardingthe financial summary operating results through April 2016.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by , second by , to receive report from Finance Department regarding financial summaryoperating results (unaudited) through April 2016.
Board/Commission Recommendation: n/ a
Overview:
Below is a description of the columns:
Current Budget — this is the most up to date budget including any changes made to dateCurrent Month Ended — this is the actual amount for the current month being reportedYTD Actual — this is the current activity for the whole year being reportedBudget Balance — this is the amount remaining of the current budget compared to the year to date actual
A couple of items to note are that property taxes and LGA are not received by the city until end of June and November orDecember which throws revenue collections way off (although it may not be allocated to the funds right away). Also, most debt payments occur June 1 and December 1 which skews the debt service funds.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: n/ a
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: n/ a
Attachments:
Operating statements
mUUL
LL
tkoa
ea
ae
a;
aa°
aea°
oa
a°x
a°
cID
Om
IDm
Ln
vo
Lb
Ln
vLD
Ln
mLD
N10
10
1O
Il:
LD
Wto
WO
00
N.
Nm
VL
nO
Ev
oo
mo
.-i
o0
on
m0
0Ln
mo
mm
Lnri
mr:
IDa
HO
Nm
Cm
ey
0JC
OJn
Oate+
cnm
XN
Ww
NO)
hL
VL
CC
V - O
LL
C
CLO
XW .a
C
LntD
nV
vv
vv
vv
vCN
Oti
Nm
KID
wLOID
ar
mo
nv
aLD
no
mn
aN
Ln
eo
m
CNA
NO
Ln
mLn
v .-
IO
M
LD
Om
ML
nv
tDO
tD
l0N
vN
Ln
NtD
nm
4
aD
0N
Oa -I
NN
Nm
00
NO
nN
nv
mc
MtD
Wo
wW
OO
LD
MMty
n .-
v
i .-i
I, w
lDo
LKV
o .-i
ooO
vi
Liw
nC
Nn
W -
IM
OL
nLO
nLD
a -I
W0
0 .--
I- Ln
nO
nN
NN
OMV
am
a6
ar`i
r`iLr
000
00
00
00
00
00
00
Oo
OO
mL
n
uc
00
00
00
00
0
oo
00
oo
oo
0O
00
OO
Lb
0N
on
W
m
o0
Loo
ton
On
Ln
ID
.
4N
oE
00n
Ln
m -i
NN
N
3VC
vm
0606
W
Lnm
mm
Nsl
T1
OLn
toLD
vm
oL-
1M
.-I
WL
nn
tD
V
NO
VO
VLn
WO
tD
IDO
o0o
MIn
mO
nm
mL
nn
Ln
nM
00
tDLD
mmlL
Q
Ow
r-
100
oo
On
no
0N
rl
LA
Ln
oN
oR
IDv
IDV
nN
OtDmZ
ON
Nlq
Ln
nN
nN
mry
oL
nrn
rn
co
MV
mO
1l
Z00
mN
rf
vo
0aao
OO
ON
ON
vN
tDO
N
NN
aT
oo
oL
nm
vm
mo
Om
On
m
o .sco
om
on
v, ,
ND
oL
nn
Dr,
oL
o0
Ww
CU)
aOau
vtD
N01
vO
m .-
IN
mID
ON
AN
mo
Nv
D- Q
ON
Na -
IM
mm
vM
oL
nLn
Nw
oo
mm
0o
voo
ooM
000oN
MN
Mm
NIr
OM
nN
er; OMo
NN
IDN
00
Ln
dm
BS
oo
SS
oo
g0
00
08
0O
OM
MO
ON
cn
o0
0v
OO
toO
LD
N
7m
mO
oa
oo
oo
00
c0
OM
mo
NO
LDv
0oo
Ln0o
covV
mt0
vm
Ln
vN
10N
v0
) N
Vo0
t0O
nN
NM
Ln
mN
Ln
o0
oO
OO
lm
V -
n
ti
n
CL
nN
Wn .-
iof
oom
-t
a01
00p
0p0
00
00
8
Ln
NfV
NNN
M
oO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
Cpip
00
00
00
00
0O
OO
OO
O
m3
MO
ON
mO
Opo
v0
oo
.-
1n
lmD ~ ~ n
MO
Ov
oo
o0
w0
CL
nO
MN
In .--
iO
mLD
ON
LnM
mm0
mm
tDv
m
NV
TN
vW
tDO
Lbn
OM
oN
NNG
nN
Ntp
otD
Nm
Lll
Nn
n .
ti
Ln
WW
tDN
NO
F- V
rn
Oj
In
NN
HNN
p
NN
Cy
V
37
6
N
7N
CC
N
d
cL7
7
d
Z
S
C
LLA
LL
N
41
p
D:
m
Z
mJ
7
N
LL
rlN
JQ
r
m
C7
WZ
LL
d
NO
OL0
N
f0 V
rCLL
UlvLLcy
f0
U
N
Cy
N10
10
QN
aC
NO
=O
u
ON
oom
rlo
nm
woo
nm
LL0
Cm
m
ZN
WH
ON
mC
me
y0J
COJ
nOate+
cnm
XN
Ww
NO)
hL
VL
CC
V - O
LL
Ly.. O
. t
fl_
N
3m
ND,
toO
VCL
O
XW .a
C
LntD
nV
vv
vv
vv
vCN
Oti
Nm
KID
wLOID
CLL
KW
Om
nM
nn
NN
ati
Ln
NO
mm
mL
n1
OO
Ln
Lb
O0
oom
rlo
nm
woo
nm
Nv
mim
nn
LDn
Ln
ei
cnmm
va+ m
0o
mm
oo
aL
nv
rnm
ooto
rnm
nn
ne
tL
n
Hn
vV
VN
NM
Na
M00
Om
Ln
na
m0
on
HN
IDO
mN
mn
mv
mlD
mNn
14V
00
00
NLf1
00
MN
L600
Dn
Ln
OLnON
000
00
00
00
00
O0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
oc
o0
Loo
ton
On
Lon00
nLn
Ln
vm
0606
OO
nn
NW
Lnm
mm
Nsl
OO
Ln
-i
m0
ON
vn
LA
N
OL
nL
n0
mN
NID
OM
NW
vN
mL
nn
vID
Mm
nM
vv
mN
00N
nmC"
ZO
NN
lqm
NLnN
MN
NON
OO
ON
ON
vN
tDO
NO
00
nO
Ln
o0o
ao
OM
MO
On
OM
mWW
wC
U) aOa
uv
tDN
01Lnn
tLn
Nm
m
Lnin
Ln
OO
80
00
00
0O
OO
OO
ML
nO
WO
MO
tDo
00
00N
DO
Nm
nm
Oti
Ln
mn
nLD
NN
LnND
iO
levv
vm
.N -t
MtD
nO
IDtD
ML
nn
00
00
00
08
O0
0p0p0
00
00
8M
NO
coO
MO
tDo0
Oo
O0
0N
mn
mn
nLD
tiLA
Di
ON
t0V
oN
lmD ~ ~ n
LLDO
n
dN
pH
OCy
3a
76
XQ
7N
W
Ln
dp
7Z
C
LL
41D: mmJNrlNrC7LL
dOL0
f0 V
ZZ
mf
wv
Yy
s(U
mQ
Lpi
Eto
an
Oof
Wn
h
S00`
0eio
Hd
p .aY
ti
lX
010)
C.
LO
.
cuVi
uii
LN
dLn
uV
ID
Nc .
i
ONN
;
OM
V-
Ln
IDW
ON
Nm
C0:
XID
tDLD
LDW
7LL
W.
V 9
T
m
ma
x
NN
Om
mVA
iA
WO
D.
N3
3N
OI^
m
oN
d0
m9
1M
<O
N
xo
2.
oI
zN
CL
Skm
Jd
am
;
zID
om
E (
D °
—
mr)
H3 C
ID
Zo
TC7O. N 70x A n AmD1 0 z TC3 m
vC
Co
11
a'
x m 3
m
n
mco
w
lT0
1
Ot0
i --
OO
tov~i
OO
VN
AO
OA
VF+
cn
Ot+
O
OF+
V
OO
Vw
OO
OIn
OO
00
NO
ON
OO
OO
Op
OA
OO
OO
pO
CO
OO
OO
00
00
00
O NA
co
NH
Oto
NO
CN
1N
t0V
OO
V1
00
0In
ON
NO
ON
OO
OO
OO
WV
00
00
00
00
00
OO
OO
OO
00
00
00
OO
NN
V1
nr
NN
NA
NW
l0V
NO
V
o-
4w
cno
om
00
torn
OV
Oio
VN
OO
NO
VV1
OO
VW
WO
Ow
00
wN co
AN
WO
NV
twll
WWWtO
tD
wnN
W (
!1
Nw0
p0 +
T
01
Ato
OO
AV
NW
VN
C0
OF+
O
Ot0
NtD
Oto
Ato
rO
AO
OW
V AN
N
OO
OO
00
00
00
F+
N
0O
OO
CO
OO
OO
CC
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
N
Ul
ACO
Gf
u1
0i-'
Of
to
ice+
O
OO
coF+
O
inw
rV
OoA
rO
OA
N0
1 ,
Aw
00
F+
AIn
OO
tDO
toO
OW
W0
1A
00
V0
0V
VN
Vt0
OO
a7O
OO
01
1+ O
In0
1to
00
00
0N
V
O1
to0
001
OD
VV
!n
OO
WO
1p
0101
00N
AO
1N
OO
W0
0V
(N
AQ
1l0
F+
NN
AW
O1
toV
00
WN
0O
WW
0N
ol
OR
I*
ON
Olo
p
Nr
N
01O
W (
nw
n00
w00
O ,twn
Ow
Or
co
D00
0000
0O
OO
W (
nw
nV
01
NO
V1
7V
WW
G1F+
W
AN
N
AW
mO
OF+
7OO
OO
O
N
WW
lNoA `
l00
7N
OO
w001
OW
0O
co00
V Ln
lAllO
ON00
A OW
Ww
LoV
WtD
VO
lN
WN
000A
A
0000W
N01
WA
tootD
OO
DLn
vA
OO
F+
N
AO
Ot0D
twDO1
NIn
NO
0000
0w
N
NN
Wm
001
nV
0O
00J
tDto
Nto
F, p+
Io
NW
OC
AO
-!
00
eo
Ip
3
1O
T
d O
TW
m
0101
m01
mm
toW
NF+
Om7
CD
70
AA
AA
C0
1A
WO
m
3 N
OO
O
m
Q1
01
-
axN
rm
AOlm
3 N
c
m00
xfD
O
O
ii
i7
SN
N
N
iA
NC
W
3N
Nf)
N
Nto
Cm
OO
O
M
OOO
OP
o
OM-
n
fD
M„
wa
om
ORw
ID
am
wm
ovmi
Om
2m
<
AM
o. m
a °
20
om
mN
ZN
Nm
a
HW
NN
Dw
O. ryam
iN
D00.
N
Avm
HO
uc
Oo
Zw
Z
Hv
I
zv
TC O. N r W70a7O ofQa
mAv
IDT
cZ
m Cv C
m Ca N
o Nx veb
a' N
mm
mm
Nr
N
01O
W (
nw
n00
w00
O ,twn
Ow
Or
co
D00
0000
0O
OO
W (
nw
nV
01
NO
V1
7V
WW
G1F+
W
AN
N
AW
mO
OF+
7OO
OO
O
N
WW
lNoA `
l00
7N
OO
w001
OW
0O
co00
V Ln
lAllO
ON00
A OW
Ww
LoV
WtD
VO
lN
WN
000A
A
0000W
N01
WA
tootD
OO
DLn
vA
OO
F+
N
AO
Ot0D
twDO1
NIn
NO
0000
0w
N
NN
Wm
001
nV
0O
00J
tDto
Nto
F,
p+
Io
NW
OC
AO
-!
00
eo
Ip
3
1O d O
OO
oO
p ?
.
CDO
Ow
OO
Od
1O N Wz
OO
OO
Oa
OOO
OP
o
OM-
n
tai+
to
ItVi,
OLn
CtoIIO
nO
r
OO
OO
DOO
OO
F -
todo
OJ
NV
N0
V0
1V
JWo
WW
V0
0O
Ot0
0
nto
o00
10
0O
00
O
TO
AO
co:, 0
Ou
c0
0S
OO
OO
OO
OO
nO
SS
SOp
DV
dR
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
.4
CO
OO
ON
00
OO
OO
Od
EO
r, G
o0
00
00
t1
Ow
oasO
yd
dN
SS
WO
nn
Sa
Wm
OioM
0OMR
OO
ON
lOO
tOD
N-i •
N•1
1. C
Am
N .•
Ia
OS
OtD
tDO
mO
1O
Or1
r•1
V1
Vf
OO
MV
1FI
Cl0
Ot0
O0
10
1O
VIQ
ON
NL!
1R
D1
VO
V1
O1
alV) N
lDtOP
tOtD
tOtD
M00
OMOR
M
cWR1i
No1
11
tOP
. 1, n
NN
NC
MOrl
D1D
101
00
N
OM
a
dS
SS
oS
oS
SS
SS
o0
oS
So
SS
SS
oN
C0
00
0C
0O
0G
00
0O
OO
GC
OC
OC
CO
aaV
/ 3
LC
C
OW
LL
jRY
V1
tDO
OtD
MM
MO
aa
OO
OS
N0
0M
N{}
OOS
30
0O
ko
t0
WO
ON
N
00
NO
OO
00
00
ntO
100
Ln
Ln
ID
1N
-1 •N0
nLM
aI L
L
QtD
O {
DO
mD
1Oto
1nv
Oe
tow
M00
GoMco
M
No1 ••
IlD
nn
nN
ND
7O
\ 0
000
1
NN
H
OT
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
0N
NW
O .5n
On
OS
nO
OO
OO
S0
00
ON
W-1
rla.
rl0
N0
0r,
c0
00
00
00
00
0m
eo
LAn
aO
aO
MM
NN
VI
1f1
00
Go
VI
coy
NN
N
cd
SO
SS
OO
OS
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
00
00
O0
OO
0S
0S
R0
p1S
OG
OO
CO
V)
LO
N1011
MV
IN
tDV
1V
CON
NC
MO
01
NN
OF
SS
SS
SS
SS
o0
0$
oS
SS
SS
Sm
ob000
00
0O
aa
00
00
0
1100
00
0O
OC
OV
ItD
No1
LqtD
N
Rrl
NM
ONOi
OF
Rrate..
rr
Rate+
ate.. u
GR
cc
cy7
73
7C
33
7n
xa
aa
ax
aa
xxa
A
W
H1A
Ato
V/
W
NN
W
t"
dO
dO
dO
dO
zz
cZ
cz
CK
OH
Cz
jK
OdC
zO
3C
KN
WJ
Na
O
Jo:
N1L
U
aT
roV
NNN
O
CO
V1N
3LL1i
cz
OW
OO
z
LL
zw
OW
Nh
MO
sm
WO
mU
t7U
WO
Od
oz
O
oL
L
o
W
oui
vbo
NNo
Q
OaQ
jG
vL
U
va
ot
Jy
QR
— C
41
OO
. C
NX
HQ
hU
dH
a. t
dU
uvi
Lh
UO
HN
UN
7N
c11a
to0
O7
OH
71D
d1V
1c
yd1cV
1c
O
dX
Nd
0tD
drr1
Nd
tpN
dV1
tDd
0 .
NN
dtD
01
NN
dtp
N
OW
Od
rG
IDX
OV
dO
Va
d6
tOto
tOX
OO
.. tO
Cc
KW
CO
CW
CC
mL
LL
L1
LL
LLL
Ln
ee
9
DO
o0
0
T
00
00
0
T
NN
m
T
NN
T
F+ A
ON
VA
to
T
70
O7
mO
7
OND
A7
97
3
o0
00
00
0
an
AA
AA
Ld
0
XO
lO
do
m '
0A
AA
Ad
00
0S
JO
OO
A<
D
. A
dA
md
OO
CL
mO
V
OlA
w0
mNtD
OO
InA
NF+
Om3
OlA
w0
m7N
m7
Nnm
7L
07
VNiX6
wO
m3
37
ytc0
Sto
Am
t;' m
a
mN
7C.
oH
dtp
Xn
nm
Nn
J00
v
A
Du
an
b
WO
tom
vii =
u,
ofm
1m
WO
GQ
OO
WW
OO
Vt
mm
3
Ot0O
Vto
A
NO
m °
v
0000
{A
Nto
D°
vM
O
00A
m
JO
OO
toto
to {
nto
toto
Ol
Nr
Am
3z
3D
mm
W
9) 0
0O
CD3
OO
O
n`
2m
OO
yN
N
mW
S
m
0O
OS
OO
Om
0'0a
O1
ID
MO
a
H<
zm
m7
rm
N6
30
Z6
1
Tm
3T
2
om
za
ZC
ON
CT
Ta
ao
to
OLnN
Oz
3
33
z3
nD
az_
O
WN
A
iW
ME
mH
mv
ztow
mW
3z
270M
amO
AmO
m
m'
toO
mm
4m
4to
tto
toH
NN
toto
N
mc
cc
cc
cc
c
mXO
OO
9C
OO
C3
OC
NN
NN
cc
cN
NN v
m mv
vo
ov
oo
vo
mm
mm
mm
mm
M—
m
nn
nn
nn
w
wt - !
pN
trw
AA
NN
F+
0 yA
W
OW
V
V1 A
AT00
1U
1N
F+
ON
00A
NtD N
ON
V
Vto
OW
DO
OA
OO
AO
oOW
VODO
AtD
Ow
Oto
WO
OVto
NO
ofO
nO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OcG
to0
00
00
00
0CO
000
00
00
00
00
0S
00
00
OC
CC
SO
CO
OC
Cf
yO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
NN
wF
+
WV1
NtoO
wA
Y•+ AF
+
F+
!••
F
+
O WA
W
OW
VA
Am00
Vl!I
NN
O `
+
mA
NtD N
l0N
V
V (
nO
WC
OO
AO
oA0
0W
OVOD
OA
t0O
WO
toW
Orn
Vtof+
Oof
Oto
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
OO
ct
W0
00
00
00
0OO
S0
00
00
OO
OO
a6O
00
00
OO
CC
O0
C0
0S
CC
SN
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
NV
AtN
itW
N
ON
OIn
NV
ul
OO
WlOi
tW
NO
NO
OO
OO
AA
AO
OO
AA
OV
tO
ObJ
WO
OO
toA
OO
OO
OC
O0a
0%
al
OC
O00
coO
Oo
00
t0tD
Oo
AN
wO
Oo
0o
OS
OV
VV
OO
OO
OG
G
FW
YA
W
Cl
NV
00A
LR
NtD
F+
N
(n
NN
totD
t0N
NN
NN
NW
WD
VV
OW
NVF+ tD
NN
VO
O0
1In
CO
tDNto
ON
OO
NWN
toN
In
ODN001n
00InOt0
OpOP
VAVA
Nw
u'i
OO
t0tD
OO
NiN
.p
OO
CO
O00
co00
toto
to
00
00
00
AA
nA
00
0V
NO
ON
WN
00
00
0N
toa
toN
nO
D1
T
ee
9
DO
o0
00!
00
00
0S
NN
m
w !•+
A
Imo+
N
NF+
AO
NV
Ato
N A
70
rn
00
0V
NV
I
AO
OW
OWO
OlO
OO
OND
ee
9
DO
o0
00!
D0
00
0S
1
m
nW
DA
!
DA
oV)
Ww
DT
AV
0001
W! 7
0w
v00
01
7O
DO
00
ow)
3@
a
T
m 3
@a
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
N0
00
SJ
OO
OS
SN
tr
OO
OO
OO
OO
Ot Vt0
C0
pa7
C.
J00
v01 <
3
WO
tom
tDto
WO
GQ
OO
WW
OO
Vtto
to0
0N
to1n
00to00
pp
totD
Ot0O
Vto
AVA
WS
dO
OO
0o00
00 {
AIn
toODA
0000
Atp
Qn
JO
OO
toto
to {
nto
toto
toO
lN
rm
m
0)
00
mm
W
9) 0
0O
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
yN
NA
GO
Cm
OO
OO
OO
OO
OS
OO
OO
0O
OS
OO
Om
0'0a
O1
aX
9*
Xa
*9
*
XX
a'
oc
oco
MO
.+
4O
orn
mv
00
No
00
00
00
00
0
Nm
o ., OMim
0tD
uio
1lms
oo
V?
m
oI
pl
gv
Om
oo
DitDi
o0
oC
00
0
OoS
o0
0
Oo
o0
00
O0g
000
tp
o. d
om
mo
mo
mm
om
00
0
aoww
OtD
ino
tom
oo
NN
o0
oN
o$
o
SS
oS
oS
Sa
CO
Noo
MN
wS
NO
OO
coO
wb
O
pO- O
aVN
7 .Mn
0O
0N
001u1 .n
tDP
IIDeO-
I
NM
OP
nn
nn
M
MptOD
tO0M
Mu1
M1
O0
1lT
t0I,
Vf
tri
00
V01
O1
Oi
O1
p00
OO
pppW
LLcC
M-1b
000tDko
NpotO
Nn (
nO
a0W
l0b
lm0 %
DDM
MM
M
pCV
rN
NN
N
aog
o8
m$
cn000S
SoS
oS
SoS
oS
SN
CO
0m
om
mO
Oo
00
00
OO
Co
o0
Oo
OC
G
LnNN
Nu
a
MM
MV
17
u.
VcWL
L
a0O
OO
OO
NN
OO
S1
OO
OS
OO
OO
OO
LLo
om
oo
OO
Oo
oO
oo
OO
ON
Ln
Nm
(n
w %
D^
Qt0LR
NN
nn
M00
mM
I, n
VN
MN
pY
p .' O
OO
V10
00
OO
GO1l1
OO
OS
OO
OO
OO
SO
SO
OS
OS
OS
SO
PO
OO
1. O
Oo
oO
.-i
iO
Oo
OO
OG
OO
C
D. Q
aM
MH
nn
n00
Mm
Y1
NN
N
OO
o0
oO
o0
0o
OO
oO
00
0o
OO
OO
OO
c0
1
i 'p
OO
ON
o0
0
OtV
N0
00
00
tDo
oto
OO
O
Ct0
tDOO
OO
WS
Oo
00C
OO
OO
Sb
OOpt0
O0m
OO
OO
OO
Lnan
ON
LKM
0~0i,
rn
MM
MM
lJm
u1p1
0001'
nOD
I u1
tCp1
1tD
NO
iO
ip
l0
00o
0o
00
00
m {
(pp
NtD
oD
to00
IDto
m00o
m-
wN
I, m
vv
0000
ofNm
Dm
ilD
tDm
mtD
0M
MM
M
FN
NN
NN
OO
OO
OO
OO
oo
Oo
SO
OS
OO
OC
OO
o0
0O
Oo
00
OO
OO
OO
O
o00 'p
oN
oN
No
t0o
Ow
ot0
tGO
00
Go
Wco
Oo
Oo
O
Ln
O0
0S
V1
ON
LnM
OM
O^ N
rl
nM
eonM
Mm
O0
on
6vi
MM
tDO
) N
0tD
00P-
Lr
t0D
lO
N :
am
mO
mi
Om
io
00
0to
oI'D
' N
0000m
N1
mAo
0O
DI
0tD
0tD
MM
In
M
FN
NN
NN
Rr
YN
yy
yy
0C
yG
yO
O
7M
77
M7
3S
37
O. 7
ax
aM
xa
Mx
aa
xa
WW
WW
to
NV
3f
lAlA
lAlA
to
jO
C
CC
cQVD11O
cN
LL
dyLL
CO) C
Wy
h
ZWw
n2O
Jm
WCDC. G
NC
wD
: O
Ca
aC
L
CC
HW
NM
aa
M9
vcc
OM
ti
W
NMC
CpLL
7LLZ
oD
. H
Nto
W7
QHy
my
I
AC
77
ZQN
Our
NV
LLLaV
LLCU
In
OL
LQ
Ay
cc
NO
16W
NT
Zto
wO
NO
CL
cc .. L
aY
6O
) v1
dC
41LCin
XOJ
IL0
y0
OlOi
OlO' ID
QxI
C511
mNOM
3H
vD1
cO) O
.ti
0N
N
C0/ Q
anNOM
3CjpiiC
OMC
OOCC
. O
WV
00
VV
[
Ft0
0a
dlD
ID
WC
KW
CC
WC
OCW
mL
LL
LL
LN
TT
T
NX
707
m
dA <
VO.
Ol '
OA
mA <
Va
xOl
13A
AN
QX
0) -
0N
AN
dX
01N
ryv
Xo+
O
mto
3D
A3
Om
W ao
Am
Om
V Om
WA
m
om
V Om
w to
A om
mO
c
y
mm 7
DrD
OOo
v,
O0O
Om
Ow
mN
m
mm
T
mTW
mT
b0
W
zz
7z
zON
OH
CA
hO
NP
QN
SS 0
0N
A
TCT
TT
RLR
La
c.
0o~0
A
OO
OV
VV
T
ATTW
TWz
pO
O
mIn
mN
mcto
meN
m
NCCN
Nm
Nf0
mS
m
FO
+
01
C
FO
+
C
10+
C
cc
Gm
n cm C
A Cm C
Om
r-
m9
x6a
O_
xa
ax
pO
xO
NN
mC
Cm
NC
NN
CC
7N
NN
MN
mm
mM
mm
mm
mm
m
nn_
nn
n_
nT
V
n
WN
++
WW
WW
VV
VV
O1
WW
vV
WW
vV
ww
u+
w
0000
ww
OBD
000
u+
w
y
ww
0A
AOS
AA
OO
V1in
OO
U, O
gW
WW
W00
00In
(n
0000
toul
00O
C0
So
p So
So
Oo
So
0 00
o
obo
o
So
o 0m
00
00
00
00
0o
0 S0
0
So
0o
So
a0'
0,
god
NN
Ln
ul
WW
WW
V1
O1
Ol
VV
VV
WW
VV
WW
VV
VW
WV
VW
W000
00W
W0c0
000W
WS
01w
WW
AA
OO
AA
OO
tokn
OO
0n (
nO
OI.
+ .
f+
j-.
0000
00
00
00C
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OW
W0
00
0W
w00
00O
Incn
Ofn
cn
C
NGO
OO0
O0
OOO
OS
00
OO
0O
OO
OO
OO
O
OOOO
OOOO
OO
OOO
COO
OOw
M- O
OO
G
OO
OO
SO
SO
00
OC
DO
OO
O.
nO
O0
0O
OO
00
00
O0
00
0O
00
00
KTN
aO
S0
OS
OO
0O
0O
OS
O0
OS
OO
SO
K ?
mO
7 C7
7
3n
afu
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
03
N
SO
SC
5O
O0
0O
OO
SS
Sm
OO
OO
OO
OO
OC
11 A
WW
NNW
NN
WW
WC
.
VV
VV
wW
VV
WVV
VV
WW
VV
WW
W00
WW
0000
WW
WTM
m
ww
OO
OO
OW
WW
Ww
C) Q
4m
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
G OO
O0
00
0O
D0
0O
LnVii
OO
Ln OO
O)
dm
OO
OS
OO
OO
OO
0O
OO
OS
OO
OO
SO
NN
A
OO
OOO
Om
WNO
Op
oo
Oo
Oo
Om
oO
OO
00
GO
o0
0O
SO
0C
00
m0
I* *
X9
*
Xo
*
t
oc
oS
S0
00
00
00
00
00
S0
0O
roO
Ov
vM
Mto
00
pO
0O
O
00
O0O
O
Do
OcO
Oc
oOo
OO
00
000
0(
nLn
Lnm
o000
o\
aE
o$ N
OS
aO
ON
I,:ci
mP
iwc
am
oo0
00
00
0O
O
Do
OcO
oo
O0O
Oo
o0
ooo .+
toto
voo
om
mf"
N
NN
V1
toV
tV
)
NV
IV
1V
IV
tO
mm
Mto
VM
VC
tot0
VtT
Rrl
Ic -I "
II
NN
MN
NN
Oc
m
WLL
iN
NN
NN
NtN'
O
V
Ln
Ln
NN
OtCL
OS
SO
SS
00
Oo
oO
OO
OO
OO
OS
O$ OS
OO
0Nc
Ooo
oO0
0o
OO
OC
OCO
O
oo
OoO
O
Oo
OoO
oo
00
00
oRa
JpcW
LL
OO
Oo
OO
ON
OO
Oo
Oo
oG
oto
top
po
Of0aT
+
0a
OS
SO
OS
OS
OO
NN
OO
I O
O
y0
00
00
0o
o0
0o
00
00
0o6
06a
su
io
0tL
NN
NV
) V
tV
tV
) V
IL
nV
IV
IV
IV
) V
ta
NoNN
Oo
oO
mm
mO
Oo
SO
o .55c?
o0
0v, a
ao
0S
OS
OS
OO
OS
O$
Oo
0o
mo
fai
o0
oD
oc
o0
00
00
0o
oo
0a+
a
Qm
(n
mM
mMV
) m
mLn
mm
toVt14
In
0o
o0
o0
oo
oo
oo
oo
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
oO
00
00
00
00
qo
OM
oO
OO
OO
o0
0C
Oo
Oo0
0$
Na
M7
lm0
t0M
Min
NN
NO
mu
coDn
mLn
NN
F
OS
SO
SS
OS
SO
OO
OO
SO
OS
OO
OO
OC
mO
00
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
oo
S14
Omj
fonM
MM
mmN
Nc
mO
MO
mt0
t0
l0tp'
VN
NN
NN
mL
nL
nv
ac
GN
N
r
mm
mm
mR
mm
mY
m
Hp
Na
NQ
HN
NLL
ON
Ow
ww
w>
Fp
2a
xO
. O
WO
ax
a7
WJ
WW
WW
ZC
VI
Vf
OO
Go
mQO
N
FL
nc
o
ZL
Lcoo
pL
Wi
O
ca
HL
LM
LLKN
' N
c
MtM
Dti
Oo
.
OF
LLN
Cl7
M7W
VI
mlM
Oco
c
cc
LL
LL
CQ
LpCWLL
F
Zm
Qm
6O
pO
pp
totld 0
OO
DU
c.7D
VN
c
3Q cc
li
vL
LM
MW
NC
Z
WJ
NW
luv
u0D
pl
W7
Nm
hI
mV
OL'
yu
yvii
Vl
vz
zn
am
wg
Mowe
v°
v°
In
C. C
Ft
Ux
WF
tF
tF
tx
Gar
ma
dOAC+ q
N0m
OiN
HO
ofr
Op0
WN
NN
0N
OU
ctM
Go
cc
MW
xN
MW
NM
dN
Md
Nd
NtoM
jV
aQ
VV
N
ho
W6
t08
KID
Xto
Xto
Ox
Cd
x
WW
WW
7W
3C
Wd'
3m3LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
lLm
LW
707
m
NX
L3a
mC
NOm
A < Vm
ax
T, 9
Am
A < V
dO
l •
0A
<
K
Q1
10
AA
A <
C
' O
yA
mp00
mWtoN
Om
m
OwLO
Am
Om
Vm
Om
ytDoA
(D
Om
0)
t+
ON
i 'o
w
W v
AN
ON
Q1
3
x n
p WS
r
CD
mm
oOm
m
Hm
dm
OM
aC
mm
Ca
mz
N9
T20ni
TT
Am0
nm0
rDm
vNm
im
30
OO
N
MO
Hc
vZv
NN
H3
Vppf
r4
NN
N
OO O
OVW
W
T
CC
L dT
3
ow00
CL
wD
+
DDO
v00
Gl
OO V
OW
VO H
OZ
zZ
NN
N
ND
AN
NN
7m C
C
m C
OD
mO
Dm
Tm
XC
CC
CC
C9
99
99
x7
9X
pa
xO
NN
Nm
7N
mM
- A
Ai
Ae
Dm
M—
m
mm Ayy
ri
WW
AA
OO
OO
Di0
wLo
Y1M
mN
.
kDn
wW
OF
+
F+
w
wo
Lncn
00
YI
V1
00
VV
VV
OD
00
m (
nA
mOV
V,
OO
NV
0C
w.
00
00
00
0o 0
mm
00
o+
m
00
0w
w
00
09
0
O
00
00
v, 0
ww
00
o0
o
00
a
0
WW
WW
Ww
NN
NN
WW
Ww
Ww
WW
WN
Of
Ot
01
NA
AO
OV
, +
+
lOD
`tO
D
OO
toL
ttD
lGV
Vw
IDV
Vyl
D1
Ol
N . .
wO
WIn
V N
WC
ww
o0
oO
0o
rno
rnm
co00
ww
mto
Am
4o
00
D
VO
OV
0aD
oCa
00
go
o0
00
00
00
00
000
00
00
00
00
0000
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
000
00
00
00
O0o
00
00
00
00o
06
Op
00
00
00
00
0o
00
o0
o0
o0
<
a
00
00
00
00
00
00
moio
0o
o
f.
wo
O4
wD
M0
00
000
00
00
00
0o
Dc
00
0G
00
i0
0c0
00
c000
o0
00
im0
0m
m0
0m
oo
rna
m
T
3n
aw
00
op
o0
00
0o
OO
oO
Oo
00
00
00
Op
mn+
00
000
00
0D
o00
00
00000
00
00
0N
V
ww
AA
ww
WW
NN
NN
7Q
Ww
Dl0)
D
ocn
Ol
D
DW
WA
AWW
WA
AI+
W
NN
WN
wn
O1
Ol
Oj
Tm
Oto (
DID
lDi0
lf
W47
AA
0.
WMN
OlD
00
DF
+WOO
OW
AIn
aW
O0
Ot
CO
0O
NO
Or
0OQ
OO
OO
OO
AO
OA
A0
0A
OO
AA
mn
Os9 co
0D
OO
wN
MD
O
A
OO
OO
OO
p00
OO
VD
03
mWOr
OO
OO
CO
0O
00
Vr
00yO
AP
of\°
00
O0
w0
0V
m0
000
4ry
"=
eEX
ee
eEoe
3
ee
ee
e
eeX
o\°
ee
* A
01
oC
ocCaO
1
a°
OCo
Ln
SCOat
co
OjiLnOGSGOO
X00
OO
00Lf, W
NV
tD
a -I
OC
GC
i
0ffa
1Co
aN
d
bC
Scc
Cd0P, d
SC
OC
OC
aC
SC
Ci0
0O
OO
NW
otoN
vm
aim
SO
Oi
CO
O
No
0O
Na
Nm
aM
aM
Ca^pM
OO
1000
aM
m
era
n
S0
0C
CO
OO
OC
oC
Cio
CO
14
oo
rID
Mn
NSo
0o
em
l0re
n
nIo'
Mn
NMW
TO
om
Oo
GC
So
0o
P50C0%
UiMfdno' OCOf
coLimnco
0NanS
So
0rnn
CO
0O
^ C
NO
W0
Cm
oLn
wv
NN
to
Lm
fad'
bMM
O0
00
CG
o0
0C
No
Wm
CK
Io
v .-
iu
14
IDV
NO
MN
cm
Ch
ON
OC
NO
OC
m
mo
o
OO
OoC
OO
O00
CN
Ocl
Oo
00
CG
0o
OOC
NOO
1
A *
aR*
ntoo,
oC
y O
O
ho
1
nN
mm
aoo
o)
h .
ti
Ro
Oo
OO
o
NW
MH
Avii
ma
Afr
mo0
Av
Lnn
M
aL
nN
Nr
bM
Ffno
oO
P, 0
1r•
o0
DotiL
nLn
00
00
OO
OO
Ln
OOr,
NN
of
Of
v
Oo
00
v0f
OO
NN
No0
Of
a
OU) droa
In
VV
hO
OD
DN
DD
HO
O
NN
N
17
xa
N7nN7a
N3a
O. x
NC
3aC
La
x
7a3a
W {
AV
31f/
1H
W
N13A
W
hfn
Nj
zj
z7
zz
7N
y1=i
LLj
LL
Ca
OmCO
DzZ
mm
LL
mm
aa
fnfo
TN
NN
NL
ntoN
Mfo
n
CC9L
9CC
C
7LL7LL
3LL3LL
0Z7LLw
wZ
NmC
1O
LZ
tJ
fo
1=il'L
VV
Wn
Da
AOZ
Ff6
u2Nm
mzZ
wZ
07
Nut
uV
mC
Nm
dU
m
wNC
WC
Ep
0. to
CZ
NA
Na
N1
OCm
NW
iv
NN
pCu
yajNa)
fnAON
HwN
M
OCrN
b0m
fLC
NH
hC
LN
NV
Nt
Nm
uL
Wd
mYi
L
CG
L
xw
vg
dnate+
fc
dN
dv'
Dd'
ad
Nd
'
Dfv
mv
aa
va
yo
+
Nd
to1p
f0p
qW
l00
as
ax
top
Nx
OfL
X
WK
CC
WW
W
Co
LL
LL
LL
LL
O
U) droa
In
t-+ O 0
Lm
TT
T
cQ
D
xN
dd
xa
3m
L
NN
w41
mtD
m •
004
1 <
a
mm
Da0
am
iu
Ai
mF
-•
Ol
mN
33
G3 m
GO
CN
Nm
00
103 to
3 m00O
em
M
wn
mm
7n
HW
nn
an
Zn
pO
m
9m
Dm
vm
O
c^ H
IDm
30
m
mm
0' m
O3
w1
7CD
o
0j
7D
mm
0
Hi
cN
jN
z0
nm
mm
G1
3to
m
CL
mmH
CM
-
I1
zH
NH
IDD
zc
mv
cc
TT
TLL3
Ca
a
L7
Fa
d OD
mO
p0
OC V
m2
Lzm
mCAC
DA
zm
om
CD
C NO
AZ
NT
mgG
TmmC
T
7C
3to
mC
NC
Dm
Gc
mG
mC
CC
C9C
Ca
C a9
xy
ax
aC a
mN
CN
Lc
cC
Lxa
fE
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
n'
Mn
n
0V
V
00
00
00
OO
OO
op
oO
pO
OO
Oo
NN
Om•
0
00
00
00
000
00
00
00
00
0c
oo
and
o0
Cl
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
0V
Vnc
OO
OO
Op
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
NN
OW
AO
CO
OO
OO
oO
OO
OGO
O' OO
GC
OC
OO
0Sco
:,
OO
OO
OO
Oo
0o
OO
nw
NN
NN
NN
NW
TO
pi
0
Nr
rF
+
01N
coW
00A
WW
OD
00
VV
Vto
OO
OO
OO
WVWV
WVWN
ONO
ON
AA
tDtD
tDWtDIn
WIDwtD
mmOto
pn
TO
OO
O0
00
0O
OO
oinO
inU'i
i0W
OL.
W
wV
GO
VA
0%
7O
OO
tDto
oto
mm
AO
oA
AW
Vo
KQ
.
tDN
OW1
00
VN
Nr
N0
0N
coN
N0
0sn
ND
1V
WW
Wl/
1W
Npt
Dm
mO
t
10+
N
VIm
WN
Nw
WA
Nto
LDID
VN
Nw
OO
OH
NN
AN
D
ID0
00
(1'
1V
tD00W
ODW00w
toOm
00V
rF
-•
Vto
wm
mN
Wnr
•n
ow
VN
NV
VV
Nm
AN
Oto
wA
00
Om
NN
NmN
pV
00to
InN
Ntp
toNr
OOO
NN
aoW
pK
Nr
rV
WO
m0
WL
AN
tDtD
iDa
Np
oO
OO
oO
OO
OO
OO
OO
Oo
0O
OW
WW
OO
OO
C0
00
OO
Op
CO
OC
O0
OO
CO
OC
OC
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O0
0O
OO
OO
VV
VN
m QN
VN
60N
WIN
7tDN
00m
00
mN
mN
NN
co
ID
V
rWtD
WW
VI
WN
b `
Dm
Imm
OND
pd
G0
V00w
WAIn
OD
LDcow00
VtoNm
NID
00
Op
Oi+
i-+ ID
mN
Nm
tow
toO
OD
NV
WW
Ww
ON
Vm
Ar
1-+ N
NVV
wOo
VmV
toWmr
F-•
Wd
N3
oto
VN
toto
VV
Vm
mV
00
NN
NO
ON
NA
S3
Pl0
WA
00
Om
NN
Nto
AID
to1D
t0
F+
O
Or
rNO
OOV
np
Nm
OO
OO
Oo
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
Op
Nr
Oy
m0
00
00
00
00
0 0oe000
0
002O
\ O
O;
e
OO
Op
O0
1O
mN
2ee '
0
9e
oOe
to
to X
o eD
NO
Im
e\
OO
SO
OO
NO
O0
00
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OG
p
cd
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
od
dd
oc
co
or,
MdC
9l
Oto
dN
Noo
vN
o0
010
tDN
om
6+
o
aL
AN
as
Ln
ma
rn
Oo
vt6
Mo
t6o
Ln
L. m
nL
no
oa
cm
` Ln
ooa
No
ooo
vN
LmL
nL
no
toV
NtD
pOis
Dl0%
r,
f,o
Vf
LA
6G
0o00
mM
Ne
•Ia
K,
v1toN
nto MM
NN
Ln
LA
mM
nn
oo
cti
Nt0
LC VC
atO+
0
00
og
go
o0
00
og
o0
og
o0
og
oON
VCO
Oo
0O
O
o0
o0
0o
Oo
oo
OC
OO
InIn
CC
OC
Ot0
ma
VNE3
LLLVCW
LL
NN
oo
-* N
tDm
oOn
OO
oo
IDID
N
tiIt
t6COM
lT01
tDt6
O
leO
LnLn
LnOO
aL
nLn
Ln
Ln
oo
cnaN
> V
ri .•i
Ln
oo
aN
oo
Go
oo '7
Hl
LnLn
Ln
OtD
%D
ON
nL
nLL
oo
co
N .-
-i
Rto
nN
ma
MN
NV
Nto
aO
lmoo
u1
Ln
QM
MLn
NN
Ln
MM
Lnco
TM
Mn
n
ai
Ln
On
MO
OO
nn
NtM
O,
tOD
OO
OtOD
Lf? L
iO
Oa
Sd
ma
%
OO
tTvi
aa
Ma
LnMm
nLNo
.i
Nc
eW
OD
Lno
0o N
vMn
nm
Mv
at7
@nip
1-4
MM
O
LA
VI
V1
OO
OO
OO
Oo
OO
OO
OO
00
0O
OO
00
O
yO
O
o0
OO
O
Do
oOo
OO
oo
OO
O
o0
aO0
00
00
OO
C
00
0OC
OO
oo
OG
CC
Co
7Vmm0F-
00
Do
go.
o.
00
00
Do
oo$
oo
cto
m0
00
00
0o
0o
o0
a0
o0
00
0o
oc
o0
Omm0
m—
ca
oc
7w
37
G3
73
7G
7a
cLxa
ax
aa
xa
ax
aW
WW
NW
NN
hto
In
13
nL
n
LL
LL
LL
CC
GC
CWcL
dC
dZ
dO
cc
0JW
J0
ZJF
Wd
Q
WW
J_
YLLLL
ad
Q
w2
mva
MN
ONOLn
oN
O
LL
0C
L=Lg
cLL
3g
aLL
LL
LL
OU
OLL
N
Zac
a
ym
mV
flO
`o
2yL
t0W
yL10
Zy
10w
m
Um
VJ
UO
VW
dy
aN
vm
Wd
da
Wa
Mm
dZ
mY
Qm
OJi
OZ
md
du
d
Cw
QC
NLu
wm
dw
NW
NN
WGl
NM
yd. y
dN
t1d
my
ad
UON
(n
tl
d
L,
TV
O
mV
ML
NO
JM
f6
U
cL
L
hto
O
6M
l0
3V
d
ah
OO
7O
a+
G
N7C
dpCN
7CC
NC
CM
Ci
LdpCp
dX
aod
Vd
a -I
Nd
Cd .-
IN
co
dd .-
IN
V14
NW
6N
aX
tDl0
Od
VX
OW
ad
aw
om
• X
dC
CW
cw
WC
CXW
Ccc
W
mLL
LL
LL
LL
M
mxa,
'a
t" N
mCL
m a4,,
00x
ON
zry
D
ol
t--
oD0
ID
0
CL
06
Ul
0
ID
O
C1CL wo to
00
00
z
into
m
wto
00
ZCL
m
pd
CD0
0x1m
cr'
3
01 'oOz0
Mm
OtV
m
0 m
CACT)
O
OCi
CLN
crcr
pp
0
O 0
O
3. M
000cn
cotoO
p
tn A
t01
0
to 84
S. A
MN
4 N0
0
OL
nL
n
00
pp
two ecn C%
cn
QO
tA
OV
pp
Nto0
00
0
mxa,
'a
t" N
mCL
m a4,,
00x
ON
zry
D
Dm
oD0
ID
0
CL
06
aq
0
ID
OoD0
9,
03
06
D0
0
O E-
0000
into
wO1
wto
00
ZCL
pd
CD0
n
m
cr'
3m M
mOtV Dm0 m
CACT)
O
OCi
CLN
crcr
01
W
O 0p0
3. M
000cn
o0OMaOOoC
VCWMOatoONN11L0LLtOCLddOD93m
mEELL
dd
drn
- m
ato
ma
yto
Ln
Ln
no
, N
Oo
oo
00
po
o0
om
vv
oo
0a
00
0n
NO
Op
am
Lno
rLn
NO
O,
NN
NN
Wn
Ca
IL
nm
ON
a -Im
NL
nV
mL
nm
o,
1' I
OO
Oo
00 .-
1
Ocn
OO
OO
OO
OO
00
0A
NO
WLn
NN
,.ti. M
AO
mn
LDO
mn
OO
LnLn
Lnm
oM
nN
00
nm
'n
HN
D1
lY
Nn
ari ?
N
Oal
Lno
NN
Nn
om
an
NN
OO
nD
1
7Ln
o0O
O '
ro
, N
Nto
-i
MN
HlT
HM
Vl
lDLn
M
LL ! C0O
mti
rM
001 ,*- N
Ln
VO
0o
N
aVo0
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
Om
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0m
nn
00
00
0C
0C
OO
OM
OO
O0
OO
OO
Oo
00
00
00
00
00
OM
O0
0N
nN
rLT
EN
mV
mO
CW
to .-
iD
, m
ato
mv
a .-
-i
tDLn
mn
ON
00
00
00
00
00
0m
wO
Op
O-
trm
Lo
np
>
D, Ln
O, O,
N .-
Im
NLn
Vm
NW
D, a
n0
00
00
00
VO
OO
noq
nO
OO
D, N
Noo
NW
nN
>
mm
oV
mw
toO
mN
gw
Ln " m
N0
00
00
00
00
00
LnM
n0
00
nN
LL
toLT
Oci
rllD
nM
nO
mL
nN
nn
NLn
LnV1
mO
nL
nN
NN
nL
nm
Q7
MN
tDn
VN
o0
MN
NT
nM
MV
NN
ti01
Ln
Nti
aO
nD
1
Qa-I
Om
NM
Nw
LnM
00
NC
MM
NN
Ln
vw
m -
-
mN
M
Nma
an
MN
00
0n
OO
om
00
00
00
OO
mO
OO
OO
OO
OO
On
mM
Vm
Ocr
Om
nn
en
o0
moo
Oto
Om
LnO
OO
oO
g0
0a, o
00
00
oO
Op
ow
nv
nm
LnO
mO
mLn
I, O
ON
ctO
.4
OLn
n-
00
00
00
0 (
nO
OO
OO
OO
o0
0V
ato
rVt-
mm
mm
an
mr
nN
MW
mL
nLn
Ln
TN
wm
M
D. +
o
om
nC
vp
oo
am
QM
MN
MLn
VL!1
Nn
Oi
LDN
MN
co
Dn
oo
NM
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
Opp
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
ppO
OO
OO
Cy
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0q
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
ip
oo
mw
OO
- G
Oo
Oo
MOO
OoO
Oo
Oo
00
00
00
0^ O
oo
OO
Om
00
07
VN
O,
NLn
VO
M -
tO
Lnm
mrl
Vto
a,
Lnco
NN
MN
nMcn
FN
N
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
jpy
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CY
n0
00
wO
OO
o0
00
m0
00
00
00
00
00
00
mLn
00
00
00
rV0
00
ND3
TC
NLl1
QO
M -
iO
Lml1m
Om
Nn
lTLl
mN
NM
HP
nn@
NO
, O
, C
L„
OD
oo
r
ON
F '
OD
ZZ
Z ~
WZ
CL
LLL
0
LL _ Z
) ZU
C - W
Z -
U ¢
m
mm
ZZ
wZ
zZ
DW
Ln
¢-
QZ
aw
Wrn
mv
Lnm
o,
aL
np
nn
o.
N0
00>
LL~
O
OO
wZ
Zm
WO
wx
00
00
0>
}=
p
00
00
0D
7=
OU
W
WH
ZO
w >
JW
>
d ¢
NN
NO
NN
0 ¢
O
NN
NN
NN
WW
- > ?
a
y~jZ
DK
w> p
OuZ
p0@
OW
mg
00
0 .
00
J3
OW
w0
00
OO
00
OtY
K
Z¢
m
wZ
>
0a
Hw
ZZ
ZO
ZZ
002
WZ
wZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZI-
F'
WW
mw
LnX
'i
GO
ZW
¢
Vw
¢
mm
mm
mm
w0
Wp
>
OO
OO
Om
mm
ZZ
Z} 0 >
m
~
LLJ
0J
ZW
LL
LL
LL
Wm
da
wLL
LL ¢= W
zK
LYatf
ZL~,,
Q¢ w
m0
¢¢
W
CK
KK
LYz
pN
Lnm
Og
zz
zn
ao_ o_ m
Jw
¢¢
e
[ z ¢
a0+ ¢
ZF=
gw
aa
am
ma
wm
m2
aa
mm
.a -iLnw
ZK
trC
CJcL
wS
¢ w
00
00
00
0W
WW
LLO
OO
OO
Oo
0o
CJZ
wg
C7J
Jo_
o_ o
wU
UU
Lnin
wW
Um
00
00
Q0
V'
HI-
HH
00
00
U'
0N
NN
Wm
U
mC
Ln
Om
mm
NL
nm
Ln
wn
O.
Na
Ln
toN
O
3O
.-1 .--
IN
NN
mM
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
wm
00
00
00
.-
i - N
toO
Om
mm
mm
m0
00
0m
mO
LL
NN
NN
.
NN
NN
NN
NN
NN
mM
mM
mM
mM
mm
MM
mm
Mm
mM
LnLn
Lnw
wO
m
N
T
0W
NN
NO
OO
toW
OW
10U, NV
i+
wO
rN
l0w
WW
WW
AF+
n
O
WAw
[n
t0w
LDN
WO
l0F
+
OO
N ioo0 pOAN N 0 NO O A F
+
01 NA 00 Ot+
4 0 M
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 2 a
Agenda Section: Public Hearing Originating Department: Community Development
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Community DevelopmentDirectorOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: 2 Presented By: City Manager
Item• Conduct Public Hearing and consider resolution approving the final plat of the Castle HouseSubdivision located at 16 and 20 South Broadway.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by seconded by to close the Public Hearing and offer a resolution, waive the reading, approving the final plat of the Castle House Subdivision located at 16 and 20 South Broadway.
Board/Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the final plat with one condition at their April 28, 2016meeting.
Overview:
The applicant is Bob Van Zile, on behalf of Van Zile Proeprties, LLC.
The property is generally located west of South Broadway and south of Center Street. The current legal description of the property is Lot 8 and 9, Block 105 South of Center Street. The two existing lots would be replatted into two lots with the following lot areas:
Lot 1 — 10, 052 square feet
Lot 2 — 8, 162 square feet
Total —18, 214 square feet
The property is zoned B- 1 ( Limited Business District). The applicant previously received a variance to allow an existing garage and residence to be located nine feet from thenew shared property line. The required side yard setback in the B- 1 zoning district is 10'. There are no conditions for plat approval. The applicant has complied with the one condition recommended by thePlanning Commission.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: N/A
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: Approval of the plat would allow the residential units to be sold separately.
Attachments:
Final Plat
Aerial Photograph
City ofNew UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 2 b
Agenda Section: Public Hearing Originating Department: Community Development
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Community DevelopmentDirectorOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: 1 Presented By: City Manager
Item• Conduct Public Hearing and consider resolution approving the use of property taxabatement for the Laboratory Instrument Leasing, Inc. project at 1126 North Front Street.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by seconded by to close the Public Hearing and offer a resolution, waive the reading, approving the use of property tax abatement for the Laboratory Instrument Leasing, Inc. (LEL) project at 1126 North FrontStreet.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
The City Council, at its May 3, 2016 meeting, approved a motion to conduct a Public Hearing on the LIL project at itsMay 17, 2016 meeting. Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc. (MVTL) occupies the building and property owned by LIL. MVTL operates a diverse group of analytical laboratories offering environmental, agricultural, food science andenergy technology testing services.
The proposed project would involve the construction of 36,750 square feet of building space for occupancy byMVTL' s existing soil and feed testing laboratories. The current legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. The new building would be located east of their current facility at 1126 North Front Street. MVTL has requested the establishment of a tax abatement program to assist with the payment of a number of atypicaland unforeseen project expenses.
A tax abatement program allows the City to rebate a portion of the property taxes back to the property owner whothen uses it to help offset development or redevelopment costs. The City has one existing tax abatement program. A permitted use of tax abatement is general economic developmentresulting in an increased tax base. The City has retained the firm of David Darrow Associates to determine the feasibility and the terms of a taxabatement program for LEL. Mr. Shannon Sweeny of this firm has provided the following information on the project:
It is his opinion that the project is eligible for tax abatement assistance.
The County Assessor' s projected increase in market value as a result of the project is $ 1, 665, 600. The proposed maximum abatement amount would be $400,000. This is based on the valuation provided by theCounty Assessor.
The maximum annual abatement payment would be $ 26,693 and in no event would it exceed the increase in
the City property tax attributed to the increase in market value as a result of the project. The term of the abatement would be 15 -years with the first abatement levy collected with taxes payable in2018.
The first payment made to LIL would occur on February 1, 2019. Both LIL and MVTL will be parties to a Development Agreement with the City. Project activities eligible for assistance with tax abatement include land acquisition, site work, parking lotremoval, parking lot reconstruction, new parking lot construction, storm water system improvements andpond construction, realignment of the bike trail, new utility services, security fencing, and streetimprovements to 12t1i North Street.
MVTL will retain 120 full -time -equivalent jobs in the City at a minimum hourly rate of $10. 00 for part-time
employees and $ 11. 00 for full-time employees exclusive of benefits. The jobs will be retained through the term of theabatement program. The number of jobs reflects potential changes resulting from the seasonality of businessoperations.
The tax abatement program would be conducted on a " pay-as- you-go" basis. This process requires LEL to initiallypay for all project expenses and the City will reimburse them as tax abatement revenues are received. If the project does not generate sufficient tax abatement revenue, LIL will assume financial responsibility for anydeficiencies.
The project will require annual reporting to the State ofMinnesota for the term of the tax abatement program.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: Tax abatement is an established Minnesota program for economic development and job retention purposes.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
Draft Resolution No. 16 — _ approving the request
RESOLUTION NO. 16 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR CERTAINPROPERTY IN THE CITY OF NEW ULM
Councilor offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ( the " Council") of the City of New Ulm, Minnesota ( the "City") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1. 01. The City has determined that there exists a need to grant a property taxabatement ( the " Abatement") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469. 1813 to469. 1815 ( the " Act") to Laboratory Instrument Leasing Inc., a Minnesota corporation
the "Developer"), to help pay a portion of the costs associated with the construction of anew agricultural testing laboratory ( the " Project") located in the City of New Ulm onproperty that has Parcel Identification Numbers of 001. 325. 001. 07. 070,
001. 325. 001. 08. 080 and 001. 001. 210. 06.060, a street address of 1126 North Front
Street ( the " Property") and that is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. TheProject will be leased to Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc. ( the "Company").
1. 02. On the date hereof, the City Council of the City conducted a duly noticedpublic hearing on the Abatement proposed to be provided by the City, at which time theviews of all interested persons were heard.
Section 2. Findings.
2. 01. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Resolution.
2. 02. It is hereby found and determined that the benefits to the City from theAbatement will be at least equal to the costs to the City of the Abatement, because:
a) The proposed improvements to the property and building are not likely totake place to the same degree absent the Abatement; and
b) Construction of the project may facilitate future facility expansion andadditional employment gains; and
c) The payroll associated with the jobs retained in the City of New Ulm; and
d) The taxes collected from the Property after termination of the Abatement; and
e) The economic activity generated by new construction will be of benefit toother businesses in the City of New Ulm; and
f) To promote the location of the new facility in the State of Minnesota.
2. 03. It is hereby found and determined that the Abatement is in the publicinterest because such action will increase the tax base and retain employment
opportunities in the City.
2. 04. It is further specifically found and determined that the Abatement providedto the Developer is expected to result in the following public benefits:
a) Securing the construction of a new 36,750 sq. ft. industrial facility in theCity of New Ulm.
b) Retention of 120 full -time -equivalent jobs in the City by the Company at aminimum hourly rate of $10. 00 for part-time employees and $ 11. 00 for full-
time employees exclusive of fringe benefits to be retained through the
term of the Abatement.
Section 3. Actions Ratified; Abatement Approved; Authorized for Execution of aDevelopment Agreement.
3. 01. The City Council hereby ratifies all actions of the City's staff andconsultants in arranging for approval of this resolution in accordance with the Act.
3. 02. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Abatement is hereby approved andadopted subject to the following terms and conditions:
a) The term " Abatement" means the City's share of real estate taxes whichrelate to the construction of the Project on the Tax Abatement Property bythe Developer and not the real estate taxes on the Tax Abatement
Property that relate to the value of the land and buildings prior toimplementation of the Project ( Assessor's Estimated Market Value for
Taxes Payable 2017) and, as determined by the City, abated in
accordance with the Tax Abatement Program.
b) The City will pay the Abatement to the Developer on the dates and inaccordance with all the terms and conditions of the Development
Agreement.
c) In accordance with Section 469. 1813, subdivision 8 of the Act, in no year
shall the Abatement; together with all other abatements approved by theCity under the Act and paid in that year exceed the greater of 10% of the
City' s net tax capacity for that year or $200, 000 ( the "Abatement Cap").
d) The City will pay the Abatement to the Developer in 15 annual installmentscommencing February 1, 2019 and continuing through February 1, 2033. In no event shall the payment of Abatement by the City to the Developer
exceed $ 26,693.00 in any year or a cumulative total of $400,000. 00 over
the abatement term.
e) The Abatement is subject to modification in accordance with the Act, and
subject to the terms of the Development Agreement.
f) In accordance with Section 469. 1815 of the Act, the City will add to its levyin each year during the term of the Abatement the total estimated amountof the current year Abatement granted under this resolution.
g) The City makes no warranties or representations regarding the amount oravailability of the Abatement.
h) The Abatement shall be provided to the Developer pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the Development Agreement.
3. 03. The tax abatement granted pursuant to this resolution shall not be
effective until the City Manager and Finance Director have executed a DevelopmentAgreement for and on behalf of the City as necessary to implement this resolution.
Section 4. Implementation. The City Manager and the Finance Director areauthorized and directed to execute and deliver any agreements necessary to implementthis resolution.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded byCouncilor and, the roll being called, the following vote was recorded:
Voting Aye:
Voting Nay:
Not Voting:
Whereupon said resolution was declared to have been duly adopted this17th
dayof May, 2016.
ATTEST:
Finance Director
President of the City Council
The above resolution approved , 2016.
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Tax Abatement Project Area:
Lots 7- 9, Block 1, Front Street Industrial Park Second Addition;
Easterly 90 feet of Lot 7 and of the Northerly 23.30 feet of Lot 6 and the westerly halfof the vacated Water Street right-of-way abutting Lot 7 and the Northerly 23. 30 feetof Lot 6, Block 210, North of Center Street.
The Northwesterly 40.00 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Front Street Industrial Park Second
Addition.
That part of vacated Water Street described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest Corner of Lot 7, Front Street Industrial Park SecondAddition said point being on the southwesterly line of vacated Water Street; thenceNorth 55 degrees 32 minutes 34 seconds East, bearing based on Brown CountyCoordinate System NAD83(07) on the northwest line of said Lot 7, a distance of
60. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Water Street, also being the point ofbeginning; thence continuing North 55 degrees 32 minutes 34 seconds East on saidnorthwest line, a distance of 60.00 feet to the northerly right of way line of vacatedWater Street; thence North 34 degrees 27 minutes 26 seconds West on said
northerly right of way line, a distance of 9. 00 feet; thence North 83 degrees 00minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 80. 06 feet to the centerline; thence South34 degrees 27 minutes 26 seconds East on said centerline of vacated Water Street,
a distance of 62. 00 feet to the point of beginning.
All in the City of New Ulm, Brown County, Minnesota.
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 3 a ( 1)
Agenda Section: Reports Originating Department: Safety Commission
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: City EngineerOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: One Presented By: City Engineer
Item• From the Safety Commission recommending establishing parallel parking on the east side ofNorth Broadway between 22nd and 23rd North Streets.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by second by to offer a resolution, waive the reading toestablish parallel parking on the east side of North Broadway between 22nd and 23rd North Streets.
Board/Commission Recommendation:
At their May 12, 2016 meeting, the Safety Commission recommended establishing parallel parking on the east side ofNorth Broadway between 22nd and 23rd North Streets.
Overview:
North Broadway between 22nd and 23rd North Streets was designed according to Municipal State Aid Standards andconstructed in 1989 to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and parallel parking on both sides of the street. Due to limited demand for on -street parking, the roadway was opened with no parking.
Now that Pollinator Park has been designated on the river side of the roadway, a seasonal demand for on -street parkinghas developed.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
As the roadway at this location was designed and constructed to accommodate on -street parallel parking, the SafetyCommission is recommending that parallel parking be allowed on the east side of the roadway, with the west sideremaining as no parking to avoid pedestrians attempting to cross the roadway at random locations.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues:
Attachments:
Aerial photo
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 3 a (2)
Agenda Section: Reports Originating Department: Safety Commission
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: City EngineerOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: Two Presented By: City Engineer
Item• From the Safety Commission recommending approving the proposed sharrow routes aspresented by Nathan Fuerst.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by second by to offer a resolution, waive the reading toapprove the proposed sharrow routes on a trial basis as presented by Nathan Fuerst.
Board/Commission Recommendation:
At their May 12, 2016 meeting, the Safety Commission recommended approving the proposed sharrow routes on a trialbasis as presented by Nathan Fuerst (Heart ofNew Ulm — Safe Routes to School).
Overview:
The Safety Commission previously recommended approval of a proposed bike route system which was subsequentlyapproved by the City Council. Mr. Nathan Fuerst has now proposed that some of these routes be marked with painted
sharrows in the roadway.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: The Safety Commission supported the proposal, but understands that there is a cost in personnel, materials and equipmentthat may limit the City' s ability to establish and maintain the proposed sharrow routes.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: Public Works Superintendent Curt Curry has estimated that it would take a two person crew 400 hours and 720 gallons ofpaint to properly install the sharrows on the proposed routes. A two person crew would consist of one full-time and onepart-time employee with a dedicated vehicle, require the hiring of the part-time individual and the purchase of a paintsprayer. The 720 gallons of paint is estimated to cost $7,200.00 and would be needed on an annual basis.
The Heart of New Ulm Project has supplied the City with a $ 10, 000.00 grant through their "Lose It To Win It" challengeto help pay for the initial work.
Attachments:
Map of Proposed Sharrow RoutesSharrow" example
F- 2
ti0
V)
04-
J1-
1,
3
0LL
.
Z30LL
V) 0CUV)
3.)
75
co
00-
Wa,
0
or—
CL
F- 2
ti0
EA
V)
04-
J1-
1,
30LL
.
Z30LL
V) 0CUV)
3.)
75co
00-
0
EA
1)
QEC6
XW
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 4 a
Agenda Section: Old Business Originating Department: City Administration
Resolution: N/A
Prepared By: Brian GramentzOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: Three ( 3) Presented By: Brian Gramentz
Item• Consider request from State Street Theater Company to accept ownership of the 1938Auditorium and take over operational and maintenance costs of the building.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by Second by to
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
On May 3, Reed Glawe, State Street Theater Company (SSTC) President, made a presentation to the City Councilregarding the possibility of the City of New Ulm accepting ownership of the 193 8 Auditorium facility so that the facilitycould qualify for Local Option Sales tax funding being considered by the RENU Committee and to take the operationalfinancial burden off of SSTC. Background information on the 1938 Auditorium:
1. 31, 168 square feet.
2. Auditorium, Locker rooms and band Room. 3. Auditorium seats about 950 people. 4. Steel and concrete construction.
5. Fire protection in most areas.
6. No air conditioning present. 7. Steam Heat, supplemental gas heat.
8. No major rewiring of the facility has occurred since construction. A new electric service was installed to non - Auditorium building section. 9. No re -plumbing of the facility has occurred since construction. 10. The Auditorium roof was replaced in 1996 with EPDM (rubber) adhered Firestone, Warranty -expired (20 years old). 11. Most recent ISD #88 utility bill breakdown reflected an Auditorium annual utility cost of $19, 000. 12. Auditorium fountains with lead issues have been addressed/ repaired.
13. Exterior tuck pointing issues identified 10 years ago have not been addressed. 14. Asbestos deterioration issues -ceiling tile ( 12" x 12") and mastic, vinyl floor tile (9" x 9") and mastic, light cord
insulation, pre -formed pipe insulation, millboard pipe insulation, mudded pipe joints on air cell/pre- formed/fiberglassinsulation, and sprayed on acoustical finish.
15. Roof drain leaders actively leaking, mold has occurred at leaking locations (Auditorium roof drain leaders need to bechecked for leaks/mold).
16. Separation of utilities from non -Auditorium property is required.
Financials from State Street Theater Company have been included to reflect their operations. Inadequate revenue to fundPhase 1- 3 or annual utilities/custodial/maintenance, or roof repairs/ tuck pointing, normal wear and tear concerns, orinstallation of upgraded electrical/plumbing4WAC equipment.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
SSTC retains ownership: As a non-profit, they may be able to apply for grants to fund the desired facility upgrades. City accepts ownership of the property and all expenses/ revenues. City accepts ownership of the property and all expenses.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: Taking ownership of the 1938 Auditorium from SSTC shifts all ownership expenses to the City ofNew Ulm tax payers. Utilities and custodial/maintenance $40,000 annually (SSTC estimate), separation of utilities +$ 100,000, major upgrade
projects estimated for Phase 1 at $ 1. 1 million, Phase 2 at $602, 500, and Phase 3 at $2.25 million. Note Phase 1- 3 do notinclude the costs for a new roof (existing rubber roof is 20 years old), tuck pointing (noted 10 years ago as needingattention), asbestos removal/ repair due to upgrades/remodeling, as well as roof drain leader leaks/mold. Electricalupgrades, plumbing upgrades, heating upgrades and new air conditioning system installation. Grants and fund raisingmay be able to assist in financing some Phase 1- 3 projects.
Attachments:
1. Annual estimate of operational cost2. Phase 1- 2- 3 project list3. SSTC Financial Position reports
The following building expense budget reflects estimated annual " average"
costs based on past usage of the Theater:
Custodial, Labor & Supplies $ 26,500
Insurance, Wk Comp, Prop, Bldg, Liab $ 3, 889
Landscaping, snow removal $ 720
Repairs, routine maintenance $ 2, 100
Utilities
Subtotal
5,838
39,047
storation, Renovation, and Adaptive ReuseATE STREET THEATRE CO.
W a _ Rev 032016
STATE STREET * indicates potential partner participationn
chitects/ Engn/ Consultants 45, 000. 00 I& S Architects, Shuler & Shook, et al..
rmits Licenses 25, 000. 00 City, county, inspections (+Murals)
terior Cleanup 15, 000. 00 Doors, keys; adapt locker rooms, mirrors
ural Restoration ( All 3)
Ie45, 760. 00 Renaissance Arts ( Tarnoveanu)
ats, aud. Removal+ installation 345, 000. 00 Irwin Seat Co.
ew restrooms 120,000. 00 Demo, plumbing, permits
evator 90,000.00 Hallway, Black Box, OBS ( 3 stops)
oading dock 28,000.00 Demo, door, permits
andicap upgrades 7, 500.00 proper ramps and seats
Catering Kitchen 150, 000.00 in old boiler Room *
Theatre " Bar" 28, 000.00 In current Playroom
ainting auditorium 75, 000. 00 Proscenium, ceilings, walls
onstruction of Orchestra Pit 57, 000.00 Demo, installation
ontingency 50, 000.00 Over runs, change orders
otal Phase ONE 1, 081, 260.00
Phase TWO
Off Broadway Studio 91, 000. 00 80 seats, flexible, wall coverings, lighting, soundStage Floor Auditorium 40,000. 00 Marley, wood, etc.
Technology 7, 500. 00 Phones, internet, cable, securityLights 90,000. 00 Dimmers, instruments, system
Sound 60, 000.00 Microphones, boards, speakers
21 Dressing rooms, shop etc 125, 000.00 shops, costumes, props, scene, etc.
Motion Picture set up 150, 000.00 projector, speakers, screen, wiring
Landscaping / aborer 15, 000.00 theatre frony yard, side yardContingency 24, 000.00 Over runs, change orders
Total Phase TWO 602, 500.00
Phase THREE
Fly Gallery ( raise roof over stage) 1, 200,000. 00 40 fly lines, " electrics," battens, galleryAddional curtains / tracks 120, 000. 00 Cyclorama, scrims, legs, borders
Outfit Black Box ( Little Gym) 250,000. 00 seats, floor, walls, sound, lights
Glass Atrium / Parking solutions 600,000. 00 New lobby in front of auditoriumContingency 75, 000. 00 Over runs, change orders
Total Phase THREE 2, 245, 000. 00
TOTAL THEATER BUILDING
RESTORATION/ RENOVATION/ 3, 928, 760. 00
ADAPTIVE REUSE
11040 851
Arneson Distrubing (Valentines Buy Back) Bank
CampChitty Royalty RefundConcessions
Credit Card Reimbursement (Paul W.) Curtain Grant
Curtain Sales
Donations
Film Festival
Fiscal Agent
Grant
Honor Fridge
Insurance Reimbursement (Auto -Owners) Interest
Outside Productions
Prop RentalReal Estate Taxes (Cenate LLC)
Rentals
Season Ticket Sales
Sponsors
Storage Rental
Ticket Sales
T -Shirt Sales
Total Income:
EXPENSES:
AdvertisingASCAP
Bank
Building MaintenanceCamp (Wizard of Oz & Charlie)
Chitty CarConcessions
Costumes
Credit Card
Curtains
Editing - Something ArtsyEngineering StudyGrant - Transfer to Trust Account
Income Taxes
Insurance
Internet & Phone
Janitorial Services
Keara Roberts - Bear
Liquor License (City of New Ulm) Miscellaneous
Membership Dues (NU Chamber, MALT, MTA)
Payroll (Executive Director)
Payroll Services (Tessa Matter)
Payroll Taxes
Postage
Production (Salaries)
Production (Supplies)
Professional Service Appraisal (ISG)
State Street Theater CompanyYear To Date Financial Position
6-1-2015 through 02-292016
55.20
1, 200.00
1, 396.92
245.04
405.66
1, 461.42
5,766.87
500.00
4,395.00
345.00
100.00
18,000.00
89.54
71. 11
4.40
2,575.00
100.00
1,249.00
11,334.00
3,052.56
2,900.00
150.00
26,822.18
665.00
7,988.96
15.20
1,850.00
1,210.13
607.20
968.55
964.09
564.59
10,345.67
1, 093.48
250.00
500.00
10,000.00
425.00
4,397.15
1, 965.88
2,880.00
50.00
200.00
156.95
339.00
11, 009.16
300.00
3,769.68
98.00
7,920.62
12,107.75
2,500.00
82,883.90
Rental Refund(s)
Rentals
Royalties
Survey (Survey Monkey) T -Shirts
Web HostingWomen's Expo
Total Expenses:
Net Gain 06-1- 2015 through 02-29-2016
Bank Balance 02-29-2016
ASSETS:
Cash in Bank
Packs/ Cables
Costumes
Props
Set Supplies
PAR Can Lights
ETC Elliptical Lights
Walkie Talkies
Headphone
Lighting BoardFlats/ Platforms
Total Assets:
Cash Basis
SSTC Account:
800.00
1, 684.59
740.62
234.00
1, 282.58
125.00
15.00
1,443.36
1, 538.92
500.00
200.00
1, 000.00
500.00
6,300.00
140.00
37.00
750.00
450.00
Bank Balance as of 03-03-2016 $ 1,443.36
89,358.85
6,474.95
2,977.43
12,859.28
State Street Theatre Co.
Year To Date Financial Position
6- 1-2014 through 05-31-2015INCOME:
Acting Classes (ISD # 88) Bank
Chair Sales
Christmas Story SponsorConcessions
Consulting Fee (Grand New Ulm, LLC) Costume Rental
Cush for Toosh
Donations
Fiddler Sponsors
Fiscal Agent Fee' s
Funds Transfer
Gift Certificate
Gnomemade Production
Grant
Interest
Movie Night
Paul Warshauer (Credit Car Reimbursement)
Paul's Apt. - Security Deposit & Payroll Tax Credit
Play ReadingProductions (Out of Town)
Refunds
Reimbursement
Rentals
Season Tickets
Seat Installation Loan
Shakespeare
Summer CampTicket Sales
Wine Donation
Total Income:
EXPENSES:
Annual Report - State of MN
Bank
Credit Card
Curtains
Domain Hosting/ EmailEditing (Something Artsy) Electrical (Paul's Metrical Inc.)
Executive Director (Compensation)
Fiddler T -Shirts
Form 990 Filing - Carlson HighlandFunds Transfer
Gnomemade Production
Insurance
Internet/ Phone
Keyboard
Loan Repayment (Paul Warshauer)
Membership Due' s - MACTMembership Due's - NU ChamberMinnesota Sings
MN BCA - Paul
Movie Night
NU Women' s Expo - ECFE
Parade (Bavarian Blast)
Payroll Setup - Tessa MatterPayroll Taxes
Play ReadingPostage
PrintingProduction (Advertising) Production (Misc.)
Production (Salaries)
Production (Supplies)
Projector Screen Frame
Rent - BuildingRental Costs
Royalties
Seat Installation
Shakespeare
Summer CampSurvey (Survey Monkey) Valentines Show (ASCAP)
Total Expenses:
Net Gain 6-1- 2014 through 05-31- 2015
Bank Balance 05-31- 2015
3,150.00
1, 750.00
821.00
300.00
577.00
500.00
20.00
132.50
5,146.19
2,960.00
514.27
1, 000.00
70.00
1, 000.00
12,416.88
2.47
396.00
34.15
551.00
170.59
1,318.00
4,281.00
850.92
591.25
8,120.25
1, 225.00
1,000.00
125. 60
1, 075.00
31,047.07
500. 00
25.00
2,350. 00
978. 36
5,936.81
100.00
250.00
1, 039,86
14,145. 78
192.57
450.00
2,000. 00
87.89
1, 861. 76
1, 583.21
100. 99
500.00
50.00
241. 75
60.00
8. 00
347.02
15.00
20.00
212.50
3,953.37
13.66
1. 05
590.07
7,549.37
7,756.66
8, 749.57
8,060.86
404.95
1, 750.00
3,586.50
4,492.48
1, 300.00
125.60
650.00
312.00
97.06
81, 646.14 $ 86,254.26
With Trust Account Funds for Curtains
81, 949.70
303.56 $ 4,304.56
With Trust Account Funds for Curtains
2,757.70
ASSETS:
Cash in Bank 1,762.47
Packs/ Cables 1,538.92
Costumes 500.00
Props 200.00
Set Supplies 1,()00.00
PAR Can Lights 500.00
ETC Elliptical Lights 6,300.00
Walkie Talkies 140.00
Headphone 37.00
Lighting Board 750.00
Flats/ Platforms 450.00
Total Assets:
Cash Basis
SSTC Account:
Bank Balance as of 06-11-2015 $ 1,762.47
13,178.39
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 a
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: n/a Prepared By: Reginald K. Vorwerk
Number of Attachments: n/a Presented By: Reginald K. Vorwerk
Item: Consider motion to schedule a joint City Council/Public Utilities Commission informationmeeting to discuss the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 4: 00 P.M.
Director' s Proposed Action:
Motion by , second by , to schedule a joint City Council/Public Utilities Commission informationmeeting to discuss the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at4: 00 P.M.
Board/Commission Recommendation: n/a
Overview:
See action above.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: n/ a
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: n/ a
Attachments:
n/ a
City ofNew UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 b
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: City Administration
Resolution: YES
Prepared By: Brian GramentzOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: One ( 1) Presented By: Brian Gramentz
Item: Consider resolution allowing the request by John Dietz, Cottonwood Properties to usepublic right-of-way for construction equipment parking for a period of time over 14 days, through June 30, 2016.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by Second by offer the resolution and waive the reading to allow John Dietz, Cottonwood PropertiesInc. to park vehicles/equipment trailers in the public right-of-way (parking lane) adjacent to the property at 1001 SouthMinnesota Street continuously, 24 hours a day, until June 30, 2016 when such authorization shall expire.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
The City Council reserved right-of-way permit authorization for all permits exceeding 14 days. John Dietz, CottonwoodProperties Inc. has been working on a residence at 1001 South Minnesota Street since he purchased the property inFebruary 2014. In finishing the project, he would like to park his vehicles/equipment trailers on public right-of-way, continuously, for 24 hours a day, until June 30, 2016.
Permits for less than 14 days are issued by the City Manager (by City Council authorization) and have been pretty issuefree in permitting process and regulation.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
Mr. Dietz has submitted a certificate of liability insurance with his Public Right -of -Way Application.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
Application
CITY OF NEW ULM
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY USE APPLICATION
Property -Owner _.-- -.- c l I'yw,lCr/ ti / / PC-& / % J) Fi2Address / 06/ S. J I>nr rv" OrW sy' Phone # - 5-07 a 176 - / 5-oI
Contractor/Event FacilitatorAddress
Phone #
Address of Work Area/ Event /' 00 / , 5, Nj,1Type of Work to bePerformed/Type of Event lzmmz- 1909
Duration of Work/Event Under 14 Days 5° Over 14 DaysDate(s) of Work/Event — ro ,8& e, qV 4 -3o - 61& j
Describe means of securing area from pedestrian traffic (please provide drawing):
om
r"4C
iv- II -r --r ii
IF YOU NEED BARICADES, PLEASE CONTACT THE STREET DEPARTMENT AT 359-8296.
Certificate of Liability Insurance must be provided if applicable.
Applicant Signature * 144 - Date
Approved Denied
Brian Gramentz, City Manager
Date cc: Police ChiefFire ChiefStreet Department
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 c
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Janine SchapekahmOrdinance: No
Number of Attachments: Two Presented By: Brian Gramentz/RegVorwerk
Item• Consider resolution authorizing a Sidewalk Caf6 to be located in front of Rodney' s Tavern, 6 South Minnesota Street and extending the liquor license into the Sidewalk Cafe area.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by _ and second by _ to offer a resolution and waive the reading authorizing a Sidewalk Cafe to be located infront of Rodney' s Tavern, 6 South Minnesota Street and extending the liquor license into the Sidewalk Cafe area.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
The City Council approved Sidewalk Cafe guidelines authorizing the use of the 4 feet of sidewalk adjacent to a buildingfor seating, tables, food and beverage service. The attached map meets the requirements set forth for the Sidewalk Cafdarea.
Primary Issues/ Alternatives to Consider: N/A
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
1. Communication from Jeffrey Dahms, Chef -Owner2. Sidewalk Cafe Map
u7
RODNEY'$
May 12, 2016
New Ulm City CouncilCity Manager Brian Gramentz
100 North BroadwayNew Ulm MN 56073
Re: Sidewalk Cafe — Rodney' s Tavern
Dear Councilors:
Rodney Zimmer, on behalf of RODZ, Inc. dba Rodney' s Tavern is requesting action on its behalfto extend RODZ Inc. liquor license to the sidewalk cafe in front of its property.
The sidewalk cafe would extend the width of the property (25') and 4' out from the buildingonto the existing sidewalk.
Two feet (2') round tables and two feet (2') square chairs will be contained within the sidewalk
cafe. The sidewalk cafe would be outlined with a painted line on the sidewalk defining thespace. The number of tables and chairs will be determined by need and space.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Rodney Zimmer
Rodney' s Tavern
NAv Um umsota 56073 • ( oII7) 3543040
z OD
G
Scoo$ 3
DO 0 0
F
City ofNew UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 d
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance Director
Resolution: N/A
Prepared By: Kim SeifertOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: Two Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item• Consider motion to review the request of Grand New Ulm LLC to reduce the 2016Assessment.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by Seconded by adopting to accept/ decline recommendations to reduce the 2016 value ofParcel # 001. 001. 063. 12. 120 Grand New Ulm LLC from $672, 600 to $639,300.
Board/Commission Recommendation:
Anne Makepeace attended the local Board of Equalization on May 2, 2016 and spoke regarding the square footagediscrepancy and current values of comparable buildings. After completing an interior inspection, it was found the mainfloor SgFt to be 750 SgFt less than original calculations. Anne Grunert, Brown County Assessor, recommended the 2016value be reduced to from $672,600 to $639,300 based on actual SgFt.
Overview:
N/A
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: N/A
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
1. Brown County Property Information2. Recommendation sheet
GRAND NEW ULM, LLC VALUATION HISTORY
AFTER 5. 09.2016 INTERIOR INSPECTION
Year Built — 1886 ( REMODELED)
Square footage - Main Bldg - 4 5A/ SgFt ( 3, 300)
2013 3 story addn - 1, 575/ SgFt
2013 1 story addn - 396/SgFt2nd
Story - 3—,375/SgFt ( 3, 300) 3rd
Story + Apt - 3-,3,75/ SgFt ( 3, 300)
SgFt 11, 871/ SgFt
Assessment 2014
Land 42,200
Building 596,200
Total 638, 400 $ 49.98/ SgFt (Land & Bldg — excluding Deck & Canopy) 46.68/ SgFt ( Bldg only — excluding Deck & Canopy)
Assessment 2015Land 46,500
Building 625, 100
Total 671, 600 $ 52. 58/ SgFt (Land & Bldg — excluding Deck & Canopy) 48. 94/ SgFt (Bldg only- excluding Deck & Canopy)
Value difference from 2014 assessment + 5. 20%
Assessment 2016
Land 46,500
Building 626, 100
Total 672, 600 $ 52. 67/ SgFt (Land & Bldg — excluding Deck & Canopy) 49.03/ SgFt (Bldg Only — excluding Deck & Canopy
Value difference from 2015 assessment +. 15%
Assessment 2016 RecommendationLand 46,500
Building 592,800 $ 53.85/ SgFt (Land & Bldg — excluding Deck & Canopy) Total 639,300 $ 49.93/ SgFt (Bldg Only — excluding Deck and Canopy)
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW CONSIDERATION FORM
PROPERTY ID: 001. 001. 063. 12. 120
PROPERTY OWNER(s): Grand New 111m LLC
PROPERTY ADDRESS: ? 1_0 Minnecnta St
PROPERTY CLASS:
PRESENT VALUE:
ASSESSOR COMMENTS:
County Assessor Grunert, Deputy Assessor Gauert along with Anne Makepeace viewed the
property at 210 N Minnesota on 5. 09.2016.
Councilor Larry Mack requested a breakdown ofwhat value the elevator adds to the buildingalong with the sprinkler system. Both which are not common in downtown buildings.
Sprinkler: $ 16,200 additional value
Elevator: $3, 700 additional value.
The kitchen is not a full service kitchen. It does not have a cooktop/grill. The kitchen does not
have the proper ventilation to do so. I recommend reducing the value of the restaurant area12, 600.
The building was re -measured, the square footage was adjusted from 12, 771/ SgFt to 11, 871/ SgFt
for a difference of 900/ SgFt. Our office records indicated the front of the building was 45'. When
remeasured we came up with 44'. The total building square footage was adjusted to reflect the
change. The remaining difference in square footage was in the rear of the building where theelevator /stair case addition was put on.
The Brown County Assessors' office recommends a new value of $639,300. This value
represents the adjustment in square footage along with adjusting the restaurant area for not beingfull service.
City ofNew UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 e
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance Director
Resolution: N/A
Prepared By: Kim SeifertOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: Two Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item• Consider motion to review the request of Target Corporation to reduce the assessed value of
the 2016 pay 2017 tax year.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Motion by Seconded by adopting to accept/ decline the recommendations to reduce theassessed value of the 2016 pay 2017 tax year of Parcel #001. 054.001. 01. 010 owned by Dayton Hudson Inc. from
3, 908, 800 to 2, 000,000.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
N/A
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: Upon receipt of the Board decision to lower assessed value for the 2016 pay 2017 tax year Target will withdraw its TaxCourt petition for the 2015 pay 2016 tax year.
As stated in attachment #2 from County Attorney Hanson, the request from Target Property Tax Department would serveas sufficient backup if the request was approved.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: N/A
Attachments:
1. Property Tax Appeal letter2. County Attorney letter
PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT
May 2, 2016
Local Board of Appeal and EqualizationC/ o Anne Grunert, Assessor
14 South State Street
Box 248
New Ulm, MN 56073-0248
RE: Property Tax AppealTarget Store (T- 1202)
1914 S. Broadway St. New Ulm, MN
Property ID: R001.054.001.01.010Taxpayer ID: 27781
To the Local Board ofAppeal and Equalization:
Remit Correspondence To:
Target Corporation
Property Tax Department T-1202PO Box 9456
Minneapolis, MN 55440-9456
Target Corporation, the owner of this property, has filed an appeal of the assessed value for the2016 pay 2017 tax year.
And
Target Corporation has filed a Tax Court Petition of the assessed value for the 2015 pay 2016 taxyear.
Target offers to settle both of these disputes as follows: The 2016 pay 2017 value be reduced by the local Board to $2,000,000. Upon receipt of the Board decision Target will withdraw its Tax Court petition for the 2015 pay2016 tax year.
I can be reached at (612) 761- 9208 or [email protected].
Regards
Robert Jacoby -- Senior Manager - Real Estate Tax
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
CHARLES W. HANsoNCOUNTY ATTORNEY
VIA E-MAIL ONLY
Anne Grunert
Brown County Assessor' s Office14 S. State Street
New Ulm, MN 56073
BROWN COUNTYP.O. BOX 248
1 SOUTH STATE STREET
NEW ULM, MINNESOTA 56073-0248
TELEPHONE 507-233- 6688
FACSIMILE 507-233- 6692
May 3, 2016
Re: Target Corporation v. County of BrownOur File No. 2175- 16
Dear Anne:
PAUL J. GUNDERSONBRECK ROLFSRUD
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEYS
I reviewed your e-mail, dated May 3, 2016, with the attached letter from Target Corporation, Property Tax Department, dated May 2, 2016. The correspondence from Target is a valid offer ofsettlement. If the City of New Ulm is in agreement, it would be my opinion that the letter would besufficient proof of the agreed settlement.
If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
arles W. Hanson
BROWN COUNTY ATTORNEY
CWH/ nlgcc: Roger Hippert (via e- mail only)
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 f
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Engineering
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: City EngineerOrdinance: N/A
Number of Attachments: One Presented By: City Manager
Item: Consider resolution adopting a methodology to reassess the balance of the 2005 special assessmentson the lots to be sold as tax forfeited lands within the Lakeside Village Addition.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by second by to offer a resolution, waive the reading to adopt a methodology to reassess the balanceof the 2005 special assessments on the lots to be sold as tax forfeited lands within the Lakeside Village Addition.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
As part of the 2005 Utility, Street and Alley Improvements — Group I Project, municipal utilities and graveled roadways wereextended into a portion of the Lakeside Village Addition. The final special assessments for this work were approved by the CityCouncil on December 20, 2005. The property owners paid the special assessments and taxes for a few years and then stoppedpayments. Several of the parcels have now gone to tax forfeiture and will be offered for sale by Brown County on May 26, 2016.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
If the City intends to reassess any or all of the 2005 special assessment amounts, it is recommended that the City Council adopt areassessment methodology prior to the May 26th sale date. Two potential options are as follows:
Option #I
The City Council previously approved the following special assessment program that activates upon " whichever comes first", for bothDacotah West Addition and Minnesota River Valley Subdivision:
1. The Buyer resells a vacant lot to a 2nd Buyer (Brown County to 1St Buyer to 2nd Buyer) (date of sale trigger); 2. 1" Buyer builds a house and receives a certificate of occupancy and moves in (may involve utility bill trigger); 3. 1St Buyer builds a house, receives a certificate of occupancy and sells to a 2nd buyer (date of sale trigger); 4. 1" Buyer builds a house, receives a certificate of occupancy and rents out the house to a second party (may involve utility bill
trigger);
5. Or for a period of five (5) years from sale date when Brown County sold the property to the 1St Buyer (date of original sale).
The terms of the special assessment are the same as the original bond issue. Ten ( 10) year repayment schedule with the same interestrate as original special assessment. In the case of Lakeside Village, the interest rate was 5. 5%.
Option #2
Because the unpaid balance of the Lakeside Village specials are less than $ 10,000 per parcel except for one parcel, another optionwould be to reassess the unpaid balance on each parcel as soon as Brown County closes the sale, with a ten ( 10) year repaymentschedule at 5. 5% simple interest on the unpaid balance.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: Informational:
As a matter of information, it should be noted that each residential lot within the Lakeside Village Addition is subject to a $ 1, 400.00sanitary sewer connection charge established by Resolution 93- 235 as benefit associated with the North Broadway interceptor trunksanitary sewer and lift station construction in 1993. This connection charge is due when a building permit is obtained.
Attachments:
Notice of Public Sale
YW
+ q
cd4.O
o
oO
O O
p
Aa
oC
l) 0
w '
W
o *
' O
v
O ;
F
ZDO
Acd
a
0c
ow
wW
Tm
oH
aa
N '
W
OW3
w
HW
w
wC
3FO
a•
3 F
C4)
H
a •
AQ
ONNa
O >? W
WT
NZ
Us~
F
oa
42
b
WZOO
vs~
CU
YN %
%%
Yrrl
YOO
UO
ocd
N
N
od
Id U
US
." 03 (Yi
UO
UN
sC
l
OO
Oi --
ia
Y
Ufs,
Yy
H
OH
Uo
oa
+
oU
WW
07
OT
YY
zo
wc
U
OY0
0U
0G
NO
OO
OC
DO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OU
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
a
OO
OO
o000
Wn
r-rzrz'K
V'K
69
to
fH
vfA
00000000
6969
69r
69V 6s
69w 69
nvi
69
C69
C69
069
UG
Ss9
[A
99
Cd
NN
NN
01
0
0) d
'
NN
NN
In
inON
O
a1C
\ 01
a\
0\
0\
Wi
V)
Iqll
InD
nO
nO
NO
w00
o0o0
vl
ovn
w)
nn
oo
oo
oo
oo
rd
-
t vin
r- c*m
o N
MtoyM
MM
MM
Vt` lzrd
•et
rlto
r- N69
NNN3
N69O
; i
O;
00
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
; 0
; 0
, 0
, 6
96
96
96
96
91
f9
9,
469
69
69
64
69
FA
69
NN
NN
NN
MM
Vxxxx
xxxx-,4
-,4
-,4
wr
aaa
wm
wca
mw
oa
ww
rw
caC
dcq
00
dq
NN7
00
ND
\
No
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
aa
aa
.a
aa.aaaaaa.aaaaaaa
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
NOm
NOetO
00OO
NS
r- N" 0
0ON0
N
00N0
It00
t0N
mN
V0
0o
CV
Ort
4w
O\
70
oN
74
O.
go
oO
Ooo
OO
o0
d,t
vi
vi
NN
NN
NN
mm
Vdt
OOOO
OOO
OO
OOO
OOOO
OOOO
OOOO
OOOO
OOOO
OOOO
OOM
Mm
MIn
In
In
V1
In
Vn
Qj
mayti
00M00M
00M00M
00M00M
00M00M
00M00M
00M00M
00M00M
00MC3C-S
OO
O1,=, OO
aOo
O0O0
O0O0
00
O0O0
00
O0O0
O0O0
OClO0
O00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
000
00
00
00
0ClO
0nn0
0nn
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
vio00o
vi
t-t.,
t--t-
o"
vivi"
v-
v
N6
9l
69
69
69
69
M6
964
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
U69
69
69
69
N
NN
cV
fVN
O\ In01InW 0
VO\ WV) 7ONc11
ci' moi' V' a, C, In
0\ InW
D\ NO
NO1Na1NCw
Nan00
00
00
00
hv
v
v-
o0
00
00
00
vi
kn
nn
vi
D\
d' ch7t`
nMooo0
v Mv M
InMvnM
Md -
N69N69
N69N69
N69O
0\
O\
01
00
00
00
00
00
W01
O\
0
01
Vl
Cd
6969
6969
M6969
6969
6969
6969
EH69
U
00N
Pa
Lnf
lLLIC
QW
0.1C
Q0.10
.1PaP
l0.1
Wf
WW
WG
qC
cC
zN
N..-
Mv
o0
000
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
aD
aa
aa
aa
¢'
aw
a.
aa
.4.
11
4.
a..
a
AW
F0
00
00
00
Cl0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o0
0a
oo
NN
O0
00
00
00
W3N
m
onj
o0000\
my
moo
t m
c+i0
00
0O
NN
O0
00
00
00
y.y
chvi
vi
vi
WN
NN
NN
Nm
c+icn
7wd
OOOO
OOOO
OOQ
OO
OO
OO
OO
OOOO
O8OO
OO
OO
OOO
OO
MO
OO
OO
MM
Mi/i
1n
InV
n
in
Vl
kn
NV
IV
lII
0C
DD
OD
DW
W0
WO
O0
0M
MM
M
MC
l
g0
Oo
00
oa
o0
60
00
00
00
00
00
00
00000
000
0o
Oo
CC
00
00
ss
s6
96
9ss
6N
96
N9
V)
ON
h
VV
ONirno
cYtV
10
7d'
a1
D\
00
O
0i
690\ 69
016910N
Oi6969v' 0169
6969
rl-
xUm
o
nn
v)°`
44
4xxx
mp
aw
co
mm
o00
a°a
aaaaa
aa
a
OO
O0
OH
OOO
OO
0O
OOiO
Ot OO
WOM
nO
M-.
Q\
7o
00
OO
OO
OO
OO
O
NIn
o
r-
OClOO
OOO
OO
OOO
OOO
OO
OO
OO
OOO
inV
iV
1n
V]
Vl
In1
nV
ll—
l— l-
00M00m
00M00
00M
M00M
00M00
00M
Mod• to7
od• O
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OC
lO
Oo
OO
o0
0000
000
000
0
0000
o0O0
o0Cl0
00o0
O0o0
0
InInknI
69
69
69
69
64
6N
9^ 6
N9
^ 6N
9^
01
01.
01
a\
01
01
0\
710
oo
IqV
lr
w1
In
wn
Vl
Oo0
wl
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
mo
oin
Itn
nr
nZt
c,
oo
a69ON69
640; 69
0: 69
0; 69
cl69
oo
po
69
69
6R
x
InIn
In
Fnt8
xxx
0.1xxx
Np
yw
aaaw
mw
waaw
mi
00
00
00
0W
OO
OO
.o
aa
aa
aaa
12
a0
wo
Clo
0C
lO
Oo
0o
O
00
Cl
ox
o0
oZ
o0000
M
000
oc)C
lC,
C>
O
Cl
OO
C>
10
10
o0
oO
o0
oW
oO
o0
0000
C/]O
OO
w0
Invi
vi
vi
vi
vi
vi
Wri
rO
o
oo0oM
M00M
ooMooM
00oo
Ol0
10
MM
ch
70
0000o
00
00O
OO
"O
OO
UO
0D
0c, 0
o
Qz
MN
—
'
Ir
In
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 g
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Reg VorwerkOrdinance: n/ a
Number of Attachments: None Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item: Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2020payments of the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series2010B, on September 1, 2016.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by , second by offering the resolution and waive the reading authorizing theearly retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2020 payments of the General Obligation Permanent ImprovementRevolving Fund Bonds, Series 2010B, on September 1, 2016.
Board/Commission Recommendation: None
Overview:
PFM and staff have completed some analysis regarding possible refunding of current outstanding bonds. It was noted thatthe city could refund two and another partial refunding and roll another partial refunding into the current sale that will besold on July 19th. Staff believes that the 2010B Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund Bonds should be called.
The 2010B PIR Bonds were originally sold to fund the 2010 utility street and alley projects. The interest savings will be66,915 for the remaining life of the bond.
Staff is recommending to refund the entire portion of this bond with available cash on September 1.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
This allows the City ofNew Ulm to refund debt for the remaining years and to save that interest.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: See above
Attachments:
None
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 h
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Reg VorwerkOrdinance: n/a
Number of Attachments: None Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Item: Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2018payments of the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series2008, on December 1, 2016.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by , second by offering the resolution and waive the reading authorizing theearly retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2018 payments of the General Obligation Permanent ImprovementRevolving Fund Bonds, Series 2008, on December 1, 2016.
Board/Commission Recommendation: None
Overview:
PFM and staff have completed some analysis regarding possible refunding of current outstanding bonds. It was noted thatthe city could refund two and another partial refunding and roll another partial refunding into the current sale that will besold on July 19'h. Staff believes that the 2008 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund Bonds should be called.
The 2008 PIR Bonds were originally sold to fund the 2008 utility street and alley projects. The interest savings will beapproximately $24,400 for the remaining life of the bond.
Staff is recommending to refund the entire portion of this bond with available cash on December 1.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: This allows the City ofNew Ulm to refund debt for the remaining years and to save that interest.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: See above
Attachments:
None
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 i
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Finance
Resolution: Yes
Prepared By: Reg VorwerkOrdinance: n/ a
Number of Attachments: None Presented By: Reg Vorwerk
Consider resolution authorizing the early retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2022Item• payments of the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007, on September 1,
2016 and authorize $325, 000 of this bond to be refinanced with the General Obligation
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Refunding Bonds, Series 2016.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by , second by offering the resolution and waive the reading authorizing theearly retirement of the December 1, 2016 through 2022 payments of the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series2007, on September 1, 2016 and authorize $325, 000 of this bond to be refinanced with the General Obligation PermanentImprovement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2016.
Board/ Commission Recommendation: None
Overview:
PFM and staff have completed some analysis regarding possible refunding of current outstanding bonds. It was noted thatthe city could refund two and another partial refunding and roll another partial refunding into the current sale that will besold on July 19th. Staff believes that the 2007 Improvement Bonds should be called and refunded.
The 2007 Improvement Bonds were originally sold to aid in the affordable housing TIF district. This original bond wassplit between a city portion and a TIF portion of the bonds. The city portion of the bond made up 34% of the bonds and
covered costs that were associated with the future lot development and city wide costs. The EDA, and Park andRecreation paid special assessments for the city portion of the bond; Park and Recreation prepaid their special assessmentsand the EDA has given preliminary approval to prepay the remainder of their special assessments. The TIF portion of thebonds is mostly paid for by special assessments being made from the TIF district. Any shortfall in either fund is funded bya general debt service tax levy.
The interest savings will be approximately $27,273 for the life of the city portion. Since staff is recommendingrefinancing the TIF portion to allow the TIF to run its course and to follow state TIF guidelines, it is unsure exactly howmuch interest will be saved for the TIF but would expect at least half of the interest to be saved which would equate to
51, 000 over the remaining 5 years.
Staff is recommending to refund the entire portion of the city bonds with current cash and to refinance $325, 000 of theTIF portion with the new bond but pay the remainder of the principal with available cash.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
This allows the City of New Ulm to refund some higher rate debt for the remaining years at a lower rate and be able tosave a nice sum of money.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: See above
Attachments:
None
City of New UlmRequest for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 5, 2016 Agenda Item Number: 5 j
Agenda Section: New Business Originating Department: Administration
Resolution: NO
Prepared By: City ManagerOrdinance: NO
Number of Attachments: Six Presented By: City Manager
Item• Consider motion to receive and order filed the 2015 Survey of Public Services andPerformance Measurement report.
City Manager' s Proposed Action: Moved by Second by to receive and order filed the 2015 Survey of Public Services andPerformance Measurement report, authorize submittal to the State of Minnesota to qualify for funding the performancemeasurement program.
Board/Commission Recommendation: N/A
Overview:
This is the fifth year of the Survey of Public Services report. The report reflects data for a five year period for mostcategories and a four year period for those that were added in during the second survey. Overall, you will notice that theaverage scores for each survey question for 2015 is reflecting positive results. Nine categories went up (OverallAppearance, Fire Protection, Streets, Snow Plowing, Sanitary Sewer, Water, Gas, Library, Community Access Channel, and Overall Quality of Services). Four service categories were within +/- 0.25 but were accounted for in the positive or
negative result for the category. Six categories satisfaction score went down (Police Protection, Electric, Recreation, Building Inspection, and Finance/Billing) . Note that the average time lived in New Ulm also increased to 33. 07 years, and increase of 3. 05%.
Ward 3 seemed to be the most satisfied section of the City ofNew Ulm, with 12 categories scoring the highest ratingbetween the Wards. Ward 1 is the least satisfied ward, having the lowest service ratings in 7 of the 15 categories, followed by Ward 2 with 5 of the lowest ratings and Ward 4 with 3 of the lowest ratings.
CONCLUSION: Ward 3 was the least satisfied Ward in 2014, and is now scoring as the most satisfied Ward in 2015. While the lowest average service category rating was 3. 44 for City Streets, with an increased rating of 1. 78%. The
highest rating was again Fire Protection at 4.57 reflecting an increased rating of 2.47%.
The departmental ratings spread of 3. 44 ( lowest) to 4.57 ( highest) falls between Satisfactory 3, Good 4 and Excellent 5, which when compared to the overall satisfaction rating of 4. 1, a very solid Good rating. Although we are doing a goodjob of providing services, we can strive to do better in all departments.
The citizen comments reveal both satisfaction and dissatisfaction in specific City/PUC service areas.
Total number of surveys mailed to citizens was 300; 75 in each ward. Of the 300, 144 surveys were returned for aresponse rate of 48% which is a decrease of 12% from last year.
Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider:
Utilize results of the survey and performance measurement results to assist in setting the 2017 budget.
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues:
Review public comment, survey and other data to assist in setting priorities for the 2017 City Budget and tax levy.
Attachments:
1. 2015 Survey of Public Services and selected Performance Measures report2. Condensed City Survey Item Averages by Ward3. City Survey Item Averages by Ward4. Survey Scale Count City Wide5. Survey Scale Count by Ward 1- 46. Survey Comments by Ward
City Wide Survey of Public Services for 2015Report to the State Auditor
April 2016
1- Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm.
2 - How would you rate the overall appearance of the city?
Scale
2011 2012 2013 2014
01- 09 yr 23 25 15 27
10- 19 yr 19 25 17 29
20- 29 yr 24 18 15 18
30- 39 yr 23 18 13 13
40-49 yr 21 22 27 24
50-59 yr 18 17 15 18
60- 69 yr 10 11 10 12
70- 79 yr 3 6 2 5
80- 89 yr 3 0 4 2
90- 99 yr 0 0 0 1
Avg. 32. 40 32. 09 35. 72 32. 09
change
3
0.96% 11. 31% 10. 16%
2 - How would you rate the overall appearance of the city?
Scale 2011 2012
1 Poor 2 1. 14 0
2 Fair 2 1. 14 6
3 Satisfactory 15 8. 57 24
4 Good 89 53. 71 110
5 Excellent 67 35.43 40
Avg. rating 4. 21
42. 70
4. 02
change
77
35. 43
4.51%
2015
19
15
20
22
13
10
13
4
1
1
33. 07
3. 05%
2013 2014 2015
1. 14 0 0.00 1 0.56 2
1. 14 2 1. 12 1 0.56 0
8.57 15 8.43 20 11. 24 13
53. 71 76 42. 70 101 56.74 77
35. 43 60 33. 71 55 30. 90 51
Avg. rating
4.27 4. 17 4. 22
change
6. 22% 2. 34% 1. 20%
3 - How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city?
Scale 2011 2012 2013
1 Poor 1 0.57 1 0.57 2
2 Fair 5 2. 84 8 2. 84 7
3 Satisfactory 14 7. 95 19 7. 95 22
4 Good 89 50.57 79 50.57 65
5 Excellent 67 38.07 71 38. 07 59
Avg. rating 4. 23 4. 19 4. 11
change 0. 95% 1. 91%
Part I Crime statistics: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0
Rape 3 2 1 0 2
Robbery 0 0 1 0 0
Agg Assault 3 9 6 3 4
Burglary 52 82 67 89 61
Theft 199 175 153 176 171
Auto Theft 9 9 7 2 3
Arson 1 0 0 0 0
Human Trafficking 0 0 0 0 0
Total 267 277 235 270 241
Page i
1. 14
3. 98
12.50
36.93
33. 52
2013
0
4
0
11
41
131
13
0
0
200
2014
3
4
16
81
72
4. 22
2. 68%
2014
1
5
1
4
58
194
11
1
0
275
1. 70
2. 27
9. 09
46.02
40.91
2015
2
4
21
52
65
4.21
0.24%
1. 40
0.00
9.09
53. 85
35. 66
1. 40
2. 80
14.69
36. 36
45.45
Part II Crime Statistics:
Other Assault 67 84 85 88 61 79 65
Forgery 2 7 4 7 6 10 7
Fraud 42 39 38 34 34 27 23
Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stolen Property 3 1 2 3 2 2 4
Vandalism 145 150 107 113 102 91 85Weapons 6 0 4 0 5 7 4
Prostitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sex Offenses 13 7 4 14 11 8 7
Narcotics 48 33 43 32 46 37 47
Gambling 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
Family & Chlidren 24 16 8 3 1 5 6
DUI 66 78 71 61 62 64 41
Liquor Laws 46 45 46 38 25 23 21Drunkeness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Disorderly Conduct 137 142 106 95 140 96 88
Vagrancy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Ex -Traffic 258 105 100 92 119 180 216Total 857 708 618 580 615 629 615
Priority Police average response time:
2011 2012 2013 2014
Domestics 2 minutes 2 m 21 s 2 min 20 sec 3 minutes
Medical Assists 3 min. 30 sec. 2 m 27 s 3 min 20 sec 2 min 42 sec
Personal Injury Acc. 2 min. 30 sec. 2 m 30 s 2 min 30 sec 1 min 38 sec
Calls for Service: 9, 799 9, 803 9, 753 9521
Criminal Investigation clearance rate: 68.80% 64.21% 67.00% 67.00%
4 - How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 20151 Poor 3 1. 73 0 1. 73 1 0.56 0 0.00 0 0.002 Fair 3 1. 73 1 1. 73 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0. 00
3 Satisfactory 5 2. 89 13 2. 89 7 3. 95 7 3. 95 8 5. 594 Good 56 32. 37 66 32. 37 54 30.51 81 45. 76 46 32. 175 Excellent 106 61. 27 96 61. 27 93 52. 54 89 50. 28 89 62. 24
Avg. rating 4.5 4.46 4. 54 4.46 4.57 3. 20change 0.89% 1. 79% 1. 76% 2.47%
Insurance Service Office ( ISO) Fire rating: 4 in town
9 rural
Average response time (dispatch to scene) in -town:
Goal 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 min. 7. 85 6.57 5. 44 5. 42 5. 51 5. 73 5. 17
Rental Inspections 607 N/ A N/ A 832 748 647 550 889
Page 2
5 - How would you rate the overall condition of city streets?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Poor 6 3. 43 8 3. 43 3 1. 69 4 2. 25 3 2. 10
2fair 14 8 20 8 16 8.99 18 10. 11 15 10. 49
3 Satisfactory 74 42. 29 72 42.29 60 33. 71 79 44.38 55 38.46
4 Good 63 36 63 36 60 33. 71 60 33. 71 58 40.56
5 Excellent 18 10. 29 16 10. 29 17 9.55 17 9.55 13 9.09
Avg. rating 3. 42 3. 33 3. 46 3. 38 3. 44
change 2. 63% 3. 90% 2. 31% 1. 78%
Pavement Condition Index in miles of street:
Rating: Score: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Adequate 66-100 pts 43. 52 53. 31% 45. 38 55. 42% 43. 81 53. 51% 45. 98 55. 96% 48.29 58.15%
Marginal 28-66 pts 9.53 11.67% 10. 22 12.48% 10. 54 12. 87% 10. 54 12. 83% 14. 56 17.53%
Failed 0- 28 pts 28.70 35. 15% 26.04 31. 80% 27. 53 33. 62% 25. 65 31. 22% 20. 20 24.32%
Total miles 81. 75 81. 64 81. 88 82. 17 83. 05
6 - How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowing on city streets?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Poor 8 4.6 8 4.6 10 5. 62 6 3. 37 5 3. 50
2 Fair 12 6.9 16 6. 9 18 10. 11 13 7. 30 5 3. 50
3 Satisfactory 56 32. 18 44 32. 18 35 19. 66 41 23. 03 33 23.08
4 Good 70 40. 23 72 40.23 63 35. 39 79 44.38 67 46.85
5 Excellent 28 16.09 38 16. 09 29 16. 29 39 21. 91 33 23. 08
Avg. rating 3. 56 3. 65 3. 54 3. 74 3. 83
change 2.53% 3. 01% 5. 65% 2. 41%
Number of miles
of city streets: 81. 75 83. 21 83. 48 85.52 88.8
Snow removal equipment: 13 units 14 units 14 units 14 units
Snow removal operators: 13 FTE' s 14 FTE' s 14 FTE' s 14 FTE' s
Figures represent 2012 and 2013
7 - How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Poor 2 1. 14 0 1. 14 1 0.56 0 0.00 1 0.70
2 Fair 1 0.57 2 0.57 0 0.00 2 1. 13 1 0.70
3 Satisfactory 19 10.8 27 10.8 16 9. 04 25 14. 12 17 11. 89
4 Good 81 46.02 85 46.02 68 38. 42 94 53. 11 68 47.55
5 Excellent 73 41. 48 63 41. 48 68 38. 42 56 31. 64 55 38.46
Avg. rating 4.26 4.18 4.32 4. 15 4. 23
change 1. 88% 3. 35% 3. 94% 1. 93%
Page 3
Number of sewage blockages per 100 connections:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Goal: 0 ratio 0 0.0192 0 0.0192 0 0 0 0Goal: 0 actual # 0 per 5189 1 per 5199 0 per 5197 1 per 5220 0 per 5247 0 per 5252 0 per 5252 0 per 5297
Cost / Million Gallons treated: $ 3, 557 $ 3, 800 4,061 3, 958 $ 4,721 $ 4,406 4, 196 $ 4, 249
Note: Increase in cost to treat; flows were significantly lower (drougt; less 1 & 1) in 2012 and 2013 than previous years
2 Fair 2 1. 14 12
Water Quality MPCA violations (764 parameters tested annually)
1 0. 56 4
Goal: 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 0 0
minor chlorine residue
17 9. 55 25
8 How woud you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services?
Scale 2011 % 2012 2013 2014 20151 Poor 3 1. 7 0 1. 7 3 1. 69 3 1. 69 1 0. 702 Fair 2 1. 14 12 1. 14 1 0. 56 4 2. 25 4 2. 80
3 Satisfactory 22 12. 5 27 12. 5 17 9. 55 25 14.04 16 11. 194 Good 76 43. 18 71 43. 18 65 36. 52 86 48.31 59 41. 265 Excellent 73 41. 48 69 41. 48 68 38. 20 60 33. 71 63 44.06
Avg. rating 4. 22 4. 22 4.26 4. 10 4. 25change 0. 00% 0. 95% 3. 76% 3. 66%
Storage capacity: 8.5 million gallons in four facilities
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015cost per 1, 000,000
of water produced: $ 3, 333 $ 3, 274 $ 4,090 4,065 3, 491 3, 730 3, 539 4, 128Gallons produced
in millions): 785.1 756.9 632.7 655. 3 765. 3 729.0 772.7 720.9
Water Quality: No contaminants were detected at levels that violated federal drinking water standardsfor the 5 year review period 2009-2013.
Preliminary figures
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services?
Scale 2011 % 2012 2013 2014 20151 Poor 3 1. 71 1 1. 71 1 0.57 0 0. 00 1 0.702 Fair 1 0. 57 2 0.57 1 0.57 3 1. 70 4 2. 80
3 Satisfactory 14 8 23 8 13 7. 39 17 9. 66 13 9. 094 Good 72 41. 14 75 41. 14 69 39.20 83 47.16 53 37.065 Excellent 85 48.57 78 48.57 69 39.20 73 41. 48 72 50.35
Avg. rating 4.34 4. 27 4.33 4. 28 4. 34change - 1. 61% 1. 41% 1. 15% 1. 40%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Dist. Syst. Gas Leaks 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Supply Gas Interruption 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Volume of Gas sold ( millions): 1. 540 Mcf 1. 192 Mcf 1. 259 Mcf 1. 160 Mcf 1. 348 Mcf 1. 335 MCF 1. 172 MCF
Page 4
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services?
Scale 2011 % 2012 % 2013 2014
1 Poor 3 1. 17 1 1. 17 2 1. 12 0 0. 00
2 Fair 2 1. 14 5 1. 14 4 2. 25 2 1. 12
3 Satisfactory 17 9.66 26 9. 66 17 9.55 20 11. 24
4 Good 82 46.59 75 46.59 64 35. 96 84 47.19
5 Excellent 72 40.91 70 40.91 68 38. 20 72 40.45
Avg. rating 4. 24 4. 18 4.24
4 Good 78
4.27
76
change - 1. 42% 1. 44%
40. 23
0.71%
41. 95
2006 US Average Goal 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
SAM 1. 49 interruptions/ cust. 0 0. 18 2. 13 0. 18 0.32 0.52 0. 65
SAIDI 244 minutes 0 1. 73 78. 6 9. 7 2. 84 14. 95 64.39
CAIDI 164 minutes 0 9.42 36.94 53. 8 88. 62 28. 75 99.67
SAM = Total number of interruptions divided by total number of customers
0. 48%
of Facilities/ Parks 41
SAIDI= Sum of total interruption durations in minutes divided by total number of customers
42 42
CAI DI= Sum of total interruption durations divided by total number of interruptions
42
Recreational facilities 177, 343 sq ft
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014
1 Poor 4 2. 33 2 2. 33 1 0.57 0 0. 00
2 Fair 7 4.07 8 4.07 5 2. 87 4 2. 30
3 Satisfactory 17 9. 88 26 9.88 21 12.07 29 16.67
4 Good 78 45. 35 76 45. 35 70 40. 23 73 41. 95
5 Excellent 66 38.37 67 38. 37 59 33. 91 68 39.08
Avg. rating 4. 13 4.11 4. 16 4. 18
change - 0.48% 1. 22% 0. 48%
of Facilities/ Parks 41 42 42 42
Recreational facilities 177, 343 sq ft 177, 343 sq ft 177, 343 scl ft 177, 343 sq ft
Park Area in acres 319 319 319 319
Park Area mowed 143 143 143 143
Trail miles 6. 3 6. 3 6. 3 6.3
Recreation Program Participants 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Youth Athletics, Swim Lessons/ Camps 1, 772 1, 965 2, 002 2, 753 2, 067
YouthSpecial Events (No Registration Required) a -4 :_ .(.. M : 2, 525
Adult Athletics 723 863 864 1, 349 1, 400
Adult Fitness Class Participants 11, 932 12, 602 17, 112 12, 813 11, 333
Totals 14,427 15, 430 19,978 16,915 17, 325
Page 5
2015 %
3 2. 10
4 2. 80
12 8. 39
61 42.66
62 43. 36
4. 23
0.94%
2015
0.066
3. 38
51. 2
2015
1 0. 70
2 1. 40
22 15. 38
64 44.76
54 37. 76
4. 17
0. 24%
43
177, 343 scl ft319
143
6. 3
12 How would you rate the library services in the city?
Scale
1 Poor
2 Fair
3 Satisfactory4 Good
5 Excellent
Avg. ratingchange
Circulation Children
Circulation Adult
Public Computer Use
2011
3
2
15
74
74
4.27
2009
72327
95839
16259
1. 79
1. 19
8. 93
44.05
44.05
2010
66640
79399
17173
2012
1
2
28
67
72
4. 22
1. 17%
2011
71630
80213
15826
1. 79
1. 19
8.93
44.05
44.05
2012
76853
71208
15939
2013 %
1
1
17
65
68
4.30
1. 90%
2013
72653
69899
18352
0. 58
0. 58
9. 94
38.01
39. 77
2014
71546
67295
25956
2014
0
0
24
72
75
4. 30
0.00%
2015
55856
59640
20640
0.00
0.00
14.04
42. 11
43. 86
2015 %
1 0. 70
1 0. 70
15 10.49
58 40.56
63 44.06
4.31
0. 23%
NOTE: 2015 totals are lower di
migration of automation syste
Totals for January/ February 2C2016 will be more accurate.
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing, permitting and building inspection services in the city?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 % 2014 2015
1 Poor 4 2. 42 8 2. 42 4 2. 35 2 1. 18 4 2. 802 Fair 10 6. 06 12 6. 06 5 2. 94 8 4. 71 8 5. 59
3 Satisfactory 41 24. 85 47 24.85 50 29.41 46 27.06 39 27. 274 Good 78 47. 27 66 47. 27 61 35. 88 79 46.47 59 41. 265 Excellent 32 19. 39 35 19.39 32 18.82 35 20.59 30 20.98
Avg. rating 3. 75 3. 64 3. 74 3. 81 3. 74change 2. 93% 2. 75% 1. 87% 1. 84%
Goal 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Total Building Permits N/ A 546 2, 051 1, 213 528 410 431 370
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 % 2014 20151 Poor 0 0 6 0 5 3. 11 3 1. 86 2 1. 402 Fair 0 0 16 0 10 6. 21 14 8. 70 7 4.90
3 Satisfactory 0 0 60 0 49 30.43 55 34.16 49 34.274 Good 0 0 54 0 54 33. 54 61 37. 89 46 32. 175 Excellent 0 0 32 0 26 16. 15 28 17. 39 22 15. 38
Avg. rating 0 3. 54 3. 60 3. 60 3. 63change 100.00% 1. 69% 0. 00% 0. 83%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Edit Suite use (hours) 2, 239 3, 247 4,092 3713 est 3, 120 3, 312 4,016
Studio use ( hours) 125 156 271 268 est 144 192 340
City meetings produced 154 147 145 145 est 175 240 245
County meetings produced 0 0 30 36 est 36 36 36
Live production events 45 66 67 61 est 63 58 60MACTA PEG Award no entries YES no entries YES Event Not Held Event Not Held Event not held
Page 6
15 How would you rate the utility billing/ finance department services in the city?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Poor 0 0 5 0 5 2. 81 4 2. 25 8 5. 592 Fair 0 0 18 0 10 5. 62 10 5. 62 6 4. 20
3 Satisfactory 0 0 40 0 35 19. 66 40 22.47 22 15. 384 Good 0 0 64 0 64 35. 96 76 42. 70 71 49.65
5 Excellent 0 0 48 0 41 23. 03 48 26.97 37 25. 87
Avg. rating 0 3. 75 3. 81 3. 87 3. 85 2.69change 100.00% 1. 60% 1. 57% 0.52%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Bond Rating(* upgraded): Al Aa2* Aa2 Aa2 Aa2 Aa2 Aa2
Annual Audit (unqualified opinion) yes yes yes yes yes yes Not Available
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city?
Scale 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Poor 1 0.58 1 0.58 1 0.57 0 0.00 3 2. 102 Fair 3 1. 75 7 1. 75 1 0.57 1 0.57 0 0.00
3 Satisfactory 26 15. 2 32 15. 2 27 15.43 29 16.57 17 11. 894 Good 98 57. 31 89 57.31 84 48.00 98 56.00 81 56.64
5 Excellent 43 25. 15 45 25. 15 43 24.57 47 26. 86 40 27. 97
Avg. rating 4.05 3. 98 4. 07 4.09 4.1 2. 87
change 1. 73% 2. 26% 0. 49% 0. 24%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Tax Levy 5, 363,923 5, 401,056 5, 629,543 $ 5, 682, 219 5, 924,827 6, 102,572 6, 596,406 6, 897,246
Taxable Market Value ( millions): 763. 20 769.30 742.60 653. 8* 649.60 662. 10 679.40 703.03
MVC to MVE state law change
Page 7
nN
r- V
*
MM
OV
Mr
MC
n _
OO
NN
Cn
ITco
NN
Cl)
NM
t` C
Oco
M4 -
4M
MV
st
e3
• M
MM
0+
V4
N
M '
ITIt
OO
CO
Nco
Nn
OO
OM
00
Cn
fnO
00
ON
NN
CA
Nq
UY00
O
N '
7M
Me)•
MM
MM
'IT
rov
mo
wo
r` u
3o
nm
rn
Nt
00
OO
M
MN
Mf0
ON
NM
O (
AO
Mtt
Mco
Vd'
mfM
m
Cn
co
OC
n00
MM
co
OO
00
00
MA
OO
Cfl
NC`
MN
M7M
Ntl)
qlf
O
co
1) r
In
NO
UC
fG6
NO
cN
US
f6N
l0N
1tm
AT
0f20
UU
UU
OOS
OO
OO
Z
ww
wm
sc
f
73
mO
fsa
aa
6N
3f0
fLN
fL6
LU
000
ow
ws
cc
cc
wt
mm
mm
Orn
i
mm
mm
NN
C2
C2
a) C10C2
0)
mf
va
v0
vi
a)
ma)
d1)
Df
mm
a)
a)
mm
m
TT
TT
T
33
33
33
22
22
22
]
l 00
O\
OfV
City Survey Item Averages By WardItem Description Ward Average
I Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm.
City 33. 07
W1 33.94
W2 35.38
W3 35.91
W4 27.53
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city?
City 4.22
W11 4.05
W2 4. 19
W3 4.58
W4 4. 14
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city?
City 4.21
W1 4.08
W2 4.22
W3 4.44
W4 4. 14
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city?
City 4.57
W1 4.60
W2 4. 50
W3 4.66
W4 4.51
S How would you rate the overall condition of city streets?
City 3.44
W11 3.25
W2 3.64
W3 3.38
W4 3.50
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets?
City 3. 83
W1 3. 78
W2 3.69
W3 3.97
W4 3. 89
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services?
City 4.23
W11 4. 33
W2 4.14
W3 4.41
W4 4.06
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page I of3
Item Description Ward Average
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services?
City 4.25
W1 4.23
W2 4.20
W3 4. 38
W4 4.22
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services?
City 4.34
W1 4.38
W2 4.20
W3 4.50
W4 4.28
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services?
City 4.23
W1 4. 10
W2 4.17
W3 4.47
W4 4.22
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities?
City 4. 17
W1 4. 31
W2 4. 17
W3 4.25
W4 3.97
12 How would you rate the library services in the city?
City 4. 31
W1 4.29
W2 4. 37
W3 4.40
W4 4.20
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city?
City 3.74
W1 3. 51
W2 3. 91
W3 3.87
W4 3.69
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel?
City 3.63
W1 3.68
W2 3.47
W3 3. 86
W4 3. 50
15 How would you rate the utility billing/ finance department services in the city?
City 3.85
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page 2 of3
Item Description Ward Average
W1 3.58
W2 3.97
W3 4. 09
W4 3. 83
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city?
city 4. 10
W1 4. 03
W2 4. 00
W3 4.31
W4 4.08
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page 3 of3
Survey Scale Count City Wide05/13/2016 Page 1 of
Survey Item Descriptions Scale (I - 5) Count
1 Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm. Average Years 33.07
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city? 1 2
3 13
4 77
5 51
Average Scale 4.22
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city? 1 2
2 4
3 21
4 52
5 65
Average Scale 4.21
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city? 3 8
4 46
5 89
Average Scale 4.57
5 How would you rate the overall condition of city streets? 1 3
2 15
3 55
4 58
5 13
Average Scale 3.44
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets? 1 5
2 5
3 33
4 67
5 33
Average Scale 3.83
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services? 1 1
2 1
3 17
4 68
5 55
Average Scale 4.23
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 1 1
Survey Scale Count City Wide0511312016 Page2of3
Survey Item Descriptions Scale (I - S) Count
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 2 4
3 16
4 59
5 63
Average Scale 4.25
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 1 1
2 4
3 13
4 53
5 72
Average Scale 4.34
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services? 1 3
2 4
3 12
4 61
5 62
Average Scale 4.23
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities? 1 1
2 2
3 22
4 64
5 54
Average Scale 4. 17
12 How would you rate the library services in the city?
Average Scale
1 1
2 1
3 15
4 58
5 63
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city? 1
2
3
4
5
4. 31
4
8
39
59
30
Average Scale 3.74
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 1 2
2 7
Survey Scale Count City Wide0511312016 Page3of3
Survey Item Descriptions Scale (1- S) Count
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 3 49
4 46
5 22
15 How would you rate the utility billing/finance department services in the city?
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city?
Average Scale
1
2
3
4
5
3.63
8
6
22
71
37
Average Scale 3.85
1 3
3 17
4 81
5 40
Average Scale 4. 1
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 1 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward Wl Scale (I - 5) Count
1 Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm. Average Years 33.94
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city? 1 1
3 6
4 22
5 11
Average Scale 4.05
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city? 1 2
3 7
4 15
5 16
Average Scale 4. 08
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city? 3 2
4 12
5 26
Average Scale 4.6
5 How would you rate the overall condition of city streets? 1 2
2 6
3 15
4 14
5 3
Average Scale 3.25
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets? 1 3
2 1
3 7
4 20
5 9
Average Scale 3.76
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services? 2 1
3 4
4 16
5 19
Average Scale 4.32
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 1 1
2 1
3 5
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 2 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward Wl Scale (I - 5) Count
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 4 14
5 19
Average Scale 4.22
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 1 1
2 1
3 1
4 16
5 21
Average Scale 4.38
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services? 1 2
2 2
3 2
4 17
5 16
Average Scale 4. 1
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities? 1 1
3 3
4 17
5 18
Average Scale 4.31
12 How would you rate the library services in the city? 1 1
3 5
4 13
5 19
Average Scale 4.29
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city? 1 3
2 3
3 12
4 13
5 8
Average Scale 3. 51
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 1 1
2 1
3 13
4 16
5 6
Average Scale 3.68
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 3 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward Wl Scale (1- S) Count
15 How would you rate the utility billing/finance department services in the city? 1 3
2 6
3 7
4 13
5 11
Average Scale 3.58
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city? 1 2
3 4
4 21
5 11
Average Scale 4.03
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 4 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W2 Scale (I - 5) Count
1 Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm. Average Years 35.38
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city? 1 1
3 3
4 19
5 13
Average Scale 4. 19
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city? 2 1
3 6
4 13
5 16
Average Scale 4.22
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city? 3 2
4 14
5 20
Average Scale 4.5
5 How would you rate the overall condition of city streets? 2 3
3 11
4 18
5 4
Average Scale 3.64
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets? 2 3
3 13
4 11
5 8
Average Scale 3.69
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services? 3 7
4 16
5 12
Average Scale 4.14
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 3 6
4 16
5 13
Average Scale 4.2
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 2 1
3 6
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 5 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W2 Scale (1- S) Count
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 4 13
5 15
Average Scale 4.2
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services? 1 1
3 4
4 17
5 13
Average Scale 4.17
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities? 2 1
3 6
4 15
5 14
Average Scale 4.17
12 How would you rate the library services in the city? 2 1
3 3
4 13
5 16
Average Scale 4.37
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city? 3 12
4 14
5 9
Average Scale 3.91
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 1 1
2 2
3 14
4 11
5 4
Average Scale 3.47
15 How would you rate the utility billing/finance department services in the city? 1 1
3 7
4 19
5 9
Average Scale 3.97
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city? 1 1
3 5
4 21
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 7 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W3 Scale (I - S) Count
1 Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm. Average Years 35.91
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city? 3 1
4 11
5 19
Average Scale 4.58
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city? 2 2
3 1
4 10
5 19
Average Scale 4.44
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city? 3 1
4 9
5 22
Average Scale 4.66
5 How would you rate the overall condition of city streets? 1 1
2 5
3 10
4 13
5 3
Average Scale 3.38
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets? 1 2
3 5
4 15
5 10
Average Scale 3.97
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services? 3 2
4 15
5 15
Average Scale 4.41
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 2 1
3 2
4 13
5 16
Average Scale 4.38
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 3 2
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 8 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W3 Scale (1- S) Count
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 4 12
5 18
Average Scale 4.5
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services? 3 2
4 13
5 17
Average Scale 4.47
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities? 2 1
3 5
4 11
5 15
Average Scale 4.25
12 How would you rate the library services in the city? 3 1
4 16
5 13
Average Scale 4.4
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city? 1 1
2 3
3 3
4 15
5 8
Average Scale 3.67
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 2 1
3 8
4 14
5 6
Average Scale 3.86
15 How would you rate the utility billing/finance department services in the city? 1 2
3 1
4 19
5 10
Average Scale 4. 09
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city? 3 3
4 16
5 13
Average Scale 4.31
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 9 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W4 Scale (1- S) Count
1 Indicate the number of years you lived in New Ulm. Average Years 27.53
2 How would you rate the overall appearance of the city? 3 3
4 25
5 8
Average Scale 4. 14
3 How would you describe your overall feeling of police protection services in the city? 2 1
3 7
4 14
5 14
Average Scale 4.14
4 How would you rate the overall quality of fire protection services in the city? 3 3
4 11
5 21
Average Scale 4.51
5 How would you rate the overall condition of city streets? 2 1
3 19
4 13
5 3
Average Scale 3.5
6 How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowering on city streets? 2 1
3 8
4 21
5 6
Average Scale 3.69
7 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city sanitary sewer services? 1 1
3 4
4 21
5 9
Average Scale 4.06
8 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city water services? 2 2
3 3
4 16
5 15
Average Scale 4.22
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 2 2
Survey Scale Count By Ward05/13/2016 Page 10 of10
Survey Item Descriptions Ward W4 Scale (1- S) Count
9 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city gas services? 3 4
4 12
5 18
Average Scale 4.28
10 How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of city electricity services? 2 2
3 4
4 14
5 16
Average Scale 4.22
11 How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities? 3 8
4 21
5 7
Average Scale 3.97
12 How would you rate the library services in the city? 3 6
4 16
5 13
Average Scale 4.2
13 How would you rate the quality of licensing permitting and building inspection services in the city? 2 2
3 12
4 17
5 5
Average Scale 3.69
14 How would you rate the quality and programming of the Community Access Channel? 2 3
3 14
4 5
5 6
Average Scale 3.5
15 How would you rate the utility billing/finance department services in the city? 1 2
3 7
4 20
5 7
Average Scale 3.83
16 How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city? 3 5
4 23
5 8
Average Scale 4.08
Survey CommentsWard Comments
W1 I am so proud to live in New Ulm. So many people comment on what a pretty clean town this is with so muchto do! I' m happy 1 got to do this survey!
6 -Many of my neighbors do not have driveways and therefore park on the street. It would be helpful if enoughtime were allowed between plowing one side of street to move the cars before plowing the other side. 14 - Sometimes the offerings are years old -parades & community events very old & not relevant. I like living inNew Ulm. I have access to exercise, cultural & educational opportunities regularly. Sometimes I wish therewere satellite classes from MSU available here.
15 -to undersand a NUPUC billing is no simple task. #6 -parking during a snow event (need to remove) should alternate odd/even till plowed curb to curb. # 11 - parks and recreation are very good, but at what cost, seems to be empire being built around/ by PR dept.
Cost of utilities are high.
The parks here are beautiful. The library has better hours than the one in Rochester.
Quit putting your nose in our business. I don' t care for the survey.
Please add more stop signs and/ or cross walks to unmarked intersections.
15 -The service is wonderful - dealing with the office help at times is not always people friendly.
I don't agree with hiring a full-time fire chief/inspector with no input from the citizens or firefighters or NewUlm. The position was found overpaid by myself and neighbors at $78,000/yr.??
Snow plows leave twin snow banks across every intersection either the N -S bound streets or E -W bound. Square corners with snow bank 8 ft. from the curb you can' t turn right without going into oncoming traffic orthe wrong lane.
Need a pool for kids who can't get out to Flandrau Park because its too far to get there. Kids need things to
do not always has to be adult drinking functions.
We do not understand why there are so many extra fees with utilities, phones and cable.
The problem is the City Council where ( last two words not legible)
PUC has the monopty on New Ulm. If another utility company were available I think things would be different. I had a situation this summer and was very unsatisfied with how it was dealt with and out $400 on a deposit Ididn' t deserve to pay. And they have a book by their phone " how to deal w/difficult people". What if they arethe difficult person? A little compassion and understanding goes a long way!
Plows need to be moving snow sooner, utility rates are too high. The city needs to promote new business notchase it out. The City doesn' t need a full time fire chief maybe a part-time chief.
Appearance and streets- always hear positive comments from people who visit or drive thru. Overall I do
enjoy living in this town and the overall quality of the city services are acceptable.
Rates are too high and keep going up.
W2 Always room for improvement. New Ulm does a pretty good job. Continue to work on getting new businesseshere and try to lower taxes. Take care of the people that do pay taxes and worry less about ones that suck usdry!
Valley Street South is bad. Semis have trashed it. It needs repair urgently. Semis should be changed for use.
The parking along Garden Street by the high school should be marked off for individual car parking. People inNew Ulm do not know how to park their cars. Also the city cab company NEEDS a CLEAN UP at his HOME.
Love this city! Great place to raise kids.
More money should be spent on recreation facilities for our youth. We have fallen way behind on updating ourfacilities.
Too many uncontrolled intersections, very scary and unsafe.
More sanding at various not just business & high volume - more comments on general public interests not
just special interests. Get rid of one way streets & alleys, very confusing for visitors & parking in downtown - try to get public offices in mall.
I appreciate the support of park & recreation in regard to supporting the puppet wagon! I would the peoplehelping the young people to keep it cooler. Perhaps getting it out of the sun during the day. I think its hotduring the B Blast. Hope they find a better place to set it this year! I
Sidewalks are terrible. Appearance does not mean functional.
Need more things for teens to do! Need more teen books at library. Lower taxes and utilities! Less new policecars and city cars!
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page 1 of3
Survey CommentsWard Comments
W2 Overall, we live in a good clean town and hopefully safe.
Parking Enforcement needs to check ALL 2 -hour parking spots including across Broadway! Need to crackdown on stop sign and red light runners. We have enough parks. Maintain the ones we have.
I am glad to be a citizen of New Ulm. It is a great place to live.
I think they could do a better job checking for trailers with junk and cars sitting on properties especially 3 or 4.
Utility bill -I have a hard time understanding the print out of the monthly bill. Especially the budget billing part. Excess or not.
The Community Access Channel is of no use to the people. Local happenings are not readily available - Sleepy Eye and Springfield are - want us to go out of town.
People cleaning alley snow and putting on side streets.
Charging people 80 -to shovel. Shovel instead of asking family if okay. Sick or hurt before doing so. Shuttingoff utilities on due date; instead need grace period. People do get paid differently. Keep up the good work.
love New Ulm and feel it is a pretty safe and friendly community. I do think that with some of the problemswith children, maybe a curfew should be enforced. Too many kids are roaming the streets past 10:00 p.m. and that only causes problems. No reason for them to be out that late.
3 -too many police do not need.
W3 # 13- n/ a to me ( I' m a senior). Need affordable apartments -some of us can't afford the $800-$ 1200 apartmentsand don't qualify for low rent because we have small savings acct for emergencys, so you have to have aroommate to help pay.
Overall New Ulm is a good place to live.
City streets definitely need work. Snow plowing is quite awful. I feel snow plows need to be out sooner to getall roads cleared and also out when it is warmer to remove slush on the roads. Thank you for taking the timeto do these surveys!
Outdoor water park? Water main problems. Too many streets pug up again after repaving. Too muchattention paid to tourism instead of good paying industry, don' t need sidewalks all over contributing to heatisland effects. Why send out letters for meetings on repaving, etc. when after concerns have been voiced youjust say " thanks for coming, but its on the schedule and we' ll be doing it anyway."?? Love living in New Ulm.
Overall, a great place to live!
Parks seem to be slanted in favor of ballfields. Utilities are on the high side with too many fixed add oncharges.
To bad can' t do something dogs s"^$# ing on private property -lawns.
12 -in person I had two books placed on reserve. Over 1 1/ 2 months later two had not received anynotification. On calling, no record was found of the books on reserve. # 14 -We've had programs cut off beforethey were finished and there was still time left on the time clock. They have been as much as 20 minutes latestarting a program.
I believe the city does a good job overall. I do think the streets could use a lot of work. North Highland is anew" street and is terrible! Thank you for letting me vent.
Our one complaint would be that snow removal doesn't get the snow away from the intersections closeenough so you don't have to get into the intersection to see a car coming from the side.
8- Investiage why water heaters do not last in this town. Help citizens regulate their water softners. # 15 -Thecategories on the billing showing current balances has been confusing -there has been improvement in clarity. New Ulm's municipal services compliments the great features of our town; medical, legal, cultural, industrial, educational, and commercial.
I think we' re a lot luckier than people in Minneapolis. Our taxes are a lot lower and the services are 100% better.
New Ulm is a very pretty city.
5 -Some of the manholes are lower than the streets and cause the cars to jar.
The cost of utilities in New Ulm are outrageous!
W4 Note item 14 -we have not seen the program.
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page 2 of3
Survey CommentsWard Comments
W4 The city is wonderful, but annual taxes at almost $4,000 and monthly utilities over $300, this city should notbe so expense to live in.
Please add more bike paths and on -street bike lanes. Make ped crossing on busiest streets safer. Make aportion of bike lanes year around.
Paint some curbs yellow -in park areas, school areas. Park & Recreation Director focuses too much on moneymaking a profit, water park would be nice. Pave spots on street faster when PUC digs them up, return
compost site to city vs MR. Police are great & we should be so lucky to have a great group of officers.
Cost efficiency is not included in the above ratings.
What is the rationale for so many uncontrolled intersections? I worry about visitors who are unaware.
The new street lights the city is installing are good based on energy consumption but cause severe lightpollution since they do not shine down on the road surface only. Please consider utilitizing downward lights toreduce spread of unneeded lights.
Anytime we have had issues with city services (water, gas) we have had prompt and professional response.
City/PUC department heads and city councilors should be required to respond to citizen concerns -do nothave to agree, but need to respond -City employees do a good job but department heads and councilors pickand choose when they respond.
Utilities in this town are costly. Sanitary storm drains are the same as unheard of in this area.
1 feel in New Ulm the cost of utilities such as gas & electric is way too high compared to other communitiesand the bills make no sense. Very unhappy about that. Service at the utility office and staff is excellent, costis concern!
Things are good but the 4's are because more things can always be done better. I have Comcast so noCommunity Access Channel!
This is a wonderful city to live in. It is a great place to raise a family! It is a city whose inhabitants are veryproud of their cultural heritage, and we look forward to enjoying that spirit!
Overall very good. Sorry for the poor rating on Community Access Channel, every now and then there is goodprogramming ( library, council meetings, etc.) but the other fill in programs are reaally not my cup of tea.
Would be nice to see more lodging options. Would like to see new/renewed sales tax ( local) be used forsomething that adds value for current residences and helps attract new residence. It would be nice to seecomcast be able to offer phone service here.
Friday, May 13, 2016 Page 3 of3