density matrix tomography, contextuality, future spin architectures t. s. mahesh indian institute of...
TRANSCRIPT
Density Matrix Tomography,
Contextuality,
Future Spin Architectures
T. S. Mahesh
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune
1/2
1/2
Density Matrix Tomography (1-qubit)
=
~
Mx
My
P C = R+iS
-P+ e = ħ / kT ~ 10-5
Background
Does not leadto signal
Deviation
May leadto signal
P C = R+iS
-P
Density Matrix Tomography (1-qubit)
NMR detection operators: x , y
1. Heterodyne detection
x = 2R
y = -2S
2. Apply (/2)y
+ Heterodyne detection
x = 2P
=
~
Mx
My
(/2)y
- R P+iS
R1 =
P0
P1
P2
R1 R2 R3
R4 R5
R6+I1 I2 I3
I4 I5
I6+ 15 REAL NUMBERS
Density Matrix Tomography (2-qubit)
NMR detection operators: x1 , y
1 , x2 , y
2
P0
P1
P2
R1 R2 R3
R4 R5
R6+I1 I2 I3
I4 I5
I6+ 15 REAL NUMBERS
Traditional Method : Requires
1. Spin selective pulses
2. Integration of Transition
Spin 1 Spin 2
I I
90x I
I 90x
90y I
I 90y
90x 90x
90x 90y
90y 90x
90y 90y
Density Matrix Tomography (2-qubit)
Density Matrix Tomography (2-qubit)
P0
P1
P2
R1 R2 R3
R4 R5
R6+I1 I2 I3
I4 I5
I6+ 15 REAL NUMBERS
Traditional Method :
Spin 1 Spin 2
I I
90x I
I 90x
90y I
I 90y
90x 90x
90x 90y
90y 90x
90y 90y
Requires
1. Spin selective pulses
2. Integration of Transition
P0
P1
P2
R1 R2 R3
R4 R5
R6+I1 I2 I3
I4 I5
I6+ 15 REAL NUMBERS
NEWMethod Requires
1. No spin
selective pulses
2. Integration of
spins
Density Matrix Tomography (2-qubit)
JMR, 2010
Density Matrix Tomography (2-qubit)
SVD
tomo
Density Matrix Tomography of singlet state
Theory
Expt
Real Imag
Correlation = = 0.98tr(rth rexp)
[tr(rth 2 ) tr(rexp
2)]1/2 JMR, 2010
Quantum Contextuality
Non- Contextuality1. The result of the measurement of an
operator A depends solely on A and on the system being measured.
2. If operators A and B commute, the result of a measurement of their product AB is the product of the results of separate measurements of A and of B.
All classical systems are NON-CONTEXTUAL
Physics Letters A (1990), 151, 107-108
Measurement outcomes can be
assigned, in principle, even before
the measurement
Non- Contextuality
Quantum Contextuality
x2 x
1 x1x
2
z1 z
2 z1z
2
z1x
2 x1z
2 y1y
2
1
1
1
1 1 -1
Measurement outcomes can not be
pre-assigned even in principle
N. D. Mermin. PRL 65, 3373 (1990).
= 6
LHVT
QM
Eg. Two spin-1/2 particles
PRL 101,210401(2008)
Laflamme,PRL 2010
~ 5.3 LaflammePRL 2010
NMR demonstration of contextuality
Sample: Malonic acid single crystal
Peres Contextuality Let us consider a system of two spin half particles in singlet
state.
Singlet state:
Physics Letters A (1990), 151, 107-108
2
1001
Peres ContextualityFor a singlet state < σx
1 σx2 > = -1
< σy1 σy
2 > = -1
< (σx1 σy
2)(σy1 σx
2)> = -1
Note:[σx
1,σx2 ] = 0
[σy1,σy
2] = 0
[σx1 σy
2 , σy1 σx
2 ] = 0
Physics Letters A (1990), 151, 107-108
Peres ContextualityFor a singlet state Pre-assignment of eigenvalues < σx
1 σx2 > = -1 x1 x2 = -1
< σy1 σy
2 > = -1 y1 y2 = -1
< (σx1 σy
2)(σy1 σx
2)> = -1 x1 y2 y1 x2 = -1
CONTRADICTION !!Note:[σx
1,σx2 ] = 0
[σy1,σy
2] = 0
[σx1 σy
2 , σy1 σx
2 ] = 0
Physics Letters A (1990), 151, 107-108
ExperimentUsing three F spins of Iodotrifluoroethylene. Two were
used to prepare singlet and one was ancilla.
Pseudo-singlet statePure singlet state is hard to prepare in NMR
02
1001
8
1)-(1
Iz1+Iz
2+Iz3
0000008
1)-(1
Pseudo-singlet statePure singlet state is hard to prepare in NMR
02
1001
8
1)-(1
Iz1+Iz
2+Iz3
0000008
1)-(1
No Signal !!<σx
1+σx2>=
0
Pseudo-singlet state
8
1)-(1
Theory
Experiment
Real Part Imaginary Part
Fidelity=0.97
Moussa Protocol Target (ρ)
<AB>
Probe(ancilla)|+ <AB> Target (ρ) Physical Review Letters (2010), 104, 160501
A B
A B
NMR circuit for Moussa Protocol
PPS Single
t
1 (Ancilla)
2
3
B
|+
A
<σx>=<AB>
Results Manvendra Sharma, 2012
Future Architectures ?
Criteria for Physical Realization of QIP
1. Scalable physical system with mapping of qubits
2. A method to initialize the system
3. Big decoherence time to gate time
4. Sufficient control of the system via time-dependent Hamiltonians
(availability of a universal set of gates).
5. Efficient measurement of qubits
DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 1998
NMR Circuits - Future
123456789
101112131415
.
.
.
Time
Qubits
xx - qubitsDecoherence
Transverserelaxation
a|00 + b |11
Loss of q. memory
{|00 , |11}
Longitudinalrelaxation
|0110010
|000000
Loss of c. memory
T2 T1<
• Addressability• Week coupling• Controllability
Larger Quantum
register
Liquid-state NMR systemsAdvantages
High resolution
Slow decoherence
Ease of control
Disadvantages
o Smaller resonance dispersion
o Small indirect (J) couplings
o Smaller quantum registerRandom, isotropic
tumbling
Single-crystal NMR systemsAdvantages
Large dipole-dipole couplings ( > 100 times J)
Orientation dependent Hamiltonian
Longer longitudinal relaxation time
Larger quantum register (???)
Disadvantages
o Shorter transverse relaxation time
o Challenging to control the spin dynamics
Single-crystal NMR systems Active spins in a bath of inactive molecules
• Large couplings
• High resolution
• Hopefully –
Larger quantum register
J. Baugh, PRA 2006
Two-molecules per unit center:
Inversion symmetry – P1 space group
So, the two molecules are magnetically equivalent
Inter-molecular interactions ?
Malonic Acid
QIP with Single Crystals
Cory et al, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022305 (2006)
Malonic Acid
QIP with Single Crystals
Cory et al, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022305 (2006)Natural Abundance
Pseudopure StatesMalonic Acid
Cory et al, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022305 (2006)
Pseudopure StatesMalonic Acid
Cory et al, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022305 (2006)
Quantum GatesEg. C2-NOT
Cory et al, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022305 (2006)
~ 5.3
R. Laflamme,PRL 2010
Glycine Single Crystal Mueller, JCP 2003
000 PPS
Floquet Register
S. Ding, C. A. McDowell, … M. Liu, quant-ph/0110014
More qubits
More coupled Nuclear Spins
More Resolved Transitions
Side-bands?
S. Ding, C. A. McDowell, … M. Liu, quant-ph/0110014
Solid-State NMR and next generation QIP
Pseudo-Pure States
13C spectra of aromatic carbons ofHexamethylbenzenespinning at 3.5 kHz
Grover’s Algorithm
S. Ding, C. A. McDowell, … M. Liu, quant-ph/0110014
Methyl 13C
Electron Spin vs Nuclear Spin
Spin e n
Magnetic moment 103 1
Sensitivity High Low
Coherence Time 1 103
Measurement
Processing
e-n Entanglement
Mehring, 2004
Entanglement in a solid-state spin ensemble•Stephanie Simmons et alNature 2011
Electron spin actuators
Cory et al
Detection of single Electron Spin
D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. J. Mamin & B. W. ChuiNature 329, 430 (2004)
by Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy
eq = ee IN
Up = SWAP (e,n1)
Ie 11 I(N-1)
Measure e-spin
If e invert
Up = SWAP (e,n2)
ee 11 I(N-1)
Cooling of nuclear spins
Cory et al, PRA 07
Nuclear Local Fieldsunder
Anisotropic Hyperfine Interaction
B0
Anisotropic Hyperfine Interaction
e-n system
Coherent oscillations between nuclear coherence on levels 1 & 2 driven by Microwave
The nuclear p pulse : 520 ns e-n CNOT gate : 2ms (0.98 Fidelity)
Anisotropic Hyperfine Interaction