densitate larve 20.04

8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04

1/65

larve dinrte scoarta si lemn

Piata Caracteristica Repetitia molid pin larice

R1 1 0 71R2 0 54 0R3 0 0 0

Total 1 54 71media 0.33 27.00 23.67R1 0 0 17R2 1 1 6R3 0 0 2Total 1 1 25media 0.33 0.33 8.33R1 0.31 0.37 0.35R2 0.36 0.34 0.36

R3 0.49 0.47 0.37Total 1.16 1.17 1.08media 0.39 0.39 0.36

R1 0 0 49.22R2 2.76 2.95 16.47R3 0.00 0.00 5.46Total 2.76 2.95 71.15media 0.92 0.98 23.72R1 3.22 0 205.56R2 0.00 159.53 0.00R3 0.00 0 0Total 3.22 159.53 205.56

media 1.07 53.18 68.52R1 0 0 0R2 13 0 28R3 0 0 0

Total 13 0 28media 4.33 0.00 9.33R1 17 0 2R2 11 3 3R3 3 0 2Total 31 3 7

media 10.33 1.00 2.33R1 0.54 0.27 0.37R2 0.23 0.41 0.39R3 0.30 0.21 0.30Total 1.07 0.89 1.06media 0.36 0.30 0.35

R1 31.33 0 5.40R2 47.47 7.24 7.66R3 10.10 0.00 6.68

Total 88.90 7.24 19.73media 29.63 2.41 6.58R1 0.00 0 0.00R2 56.10 0.00 71.45R3 0.00 0 0Total 56.10 0.00 71.45

P1

Nr intrari

Nr larve

supraf. sc

dens.larve

dens.intrari

Nr intrari

Nr larve

supraf. sc

dens.larve


2/65

media 18.70 0.00 23.82

PIATA 1

DENS CA LARVE

Repetitia molid pin larice RepetitiaR1 0 0 49.22 R1R2 2.76 2.95428 16.47 R2R3 0.00 0.00 5.46 R3

med 0.92 0.98 23.72 medsd 1.59609 1.705654 22.8 sd

Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.120415 Z maxz min 0.57735 0.57735 0.802082 z minZteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41

H 203.3401 H

Hteor=87.5 Hteor=87.5

Repetitia molid pin larice RepetitiaR1 0 0 1.700862 R1R2 0.575708 0.597067 1.242359 R2R3 0 0 0.810409 R3

med 0.19 0.20 1.25 medsd 0.332385 0.344717 0.4 sd

Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.00979 Z maxz min 0.57735 0.57735 0.989913 z minZteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41

H 1.794762 H


SPECIA SPECIAR1 R2 R3

MO 0 0.575708 0 MOPI 0 0.597067 0 PILA 1.700862 1.242359 0.810409 LA

Repetitia Specia RepetitiaMO PI LA

R1 0 0 1.700862 R1R2 0.575708 0.597067 1.242359 R2R3 0 0 0.810409 R3

dens.intrari

Repetitia

P2


3/65

Piaa Factorul DF

P2

ului ca nr.l 2

P1

ului ca nr.l 2

lui ca nr.i 1

lui ca nr.i 2


4/65

pin

0

0.000

0.000

#DIV/0!#DIV/0!


5/65

PIATA 2DENS INTRARI DENS CA LARVE

molid pin larice Repetitia molid pin larice3.22 0 205.56 R1 31.33 0 5.400.00 159.53 0.00 R2 47.47 7.24 7.660.00 0 0 R3 10.10 0.00 6.681.07 53.18 68.52 med 29.63 2.41 6.58

1.857268 92.10532 118.7 sd 18.74233 4.178853 1.11.154701 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 0.951618 1.154701 0.9529550.57735 0.57735 0.57735 z min 1.042216 0.57735 1.041196

Zteor=1.41

4083.21 H 274.0408

Hteor=87.5

molid pin larice Repetitia molid pin larice0.624991 0 2.315044 R1 1.50962 0 0.8060320 2.205559 0 R2 1.685461 0.915821 0.9372950 0 0 R3 1.045304 0 0.885166

0.21 0.74 0.77 med 1.41 0.31 0.880.360839 1.27338 1.3 sd 0.330734 0.528749 0.11.154701 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 0.82241 1.154701 0.9249220.57735 0.57735 0.57735 z min 1.113153 0.57735 1.061118

Zteor=1.41

13.72051 H 64.00137

Hteor=87.5

SPECIA DENS LARVE

molid 1.50962R1 R2 R3 pin 00.624991 0 2.315044 larice 0.806032

0 2.205559 0 molid 1.6854610 0 0 pin 0.915821

larice 0.937295

molid 1.045304Specia pin 0

MO PI LA larice 0.8851660.624991 0 0

0 2.205559 02.315044 0 0

Repetitia


6/65

F P

7,027

0,253 0,785

7,820

0,027

0,029 0,874

0,021


7/65

larve din le

Piata Caracteristica Repetitia

R1R2R3

TotalmediaR1R2R3TotalmediaR1R2

R3Totalmedia

R1R2R3TotalmediaR1R2R3Total

mediaR1R2R3

TotalmediaR1R2R3Total

mediaR1R2R3Totalmedia

R1R2R3

TotalmediaR1R2R3Total

Nr intrari

Nr larve

supraf. sc

dens.larve

P1

Nr intrari

Nr larve

supraf. sc

dens.larve

dens.intrari


8/65

media

DENS INTRARI DENS CA LARVE

Repetitia molid larice Repetitia molidR1 0.00 0.00 R1 3.22R2 56.10 71.45 R2 0.00R3 0.00 0 R3 0.00

med 18.70 23.82 med 1.07

sd 32.38894 41.3 sd 1.857268Z max 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 1.154701z min 0.57735 0.57735 z min 0.57735Zteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41

H 1.622232 H 1347.604


Repetitia molidSPECIA R1 0.624991R1 R2 R3 R2 0

MO 0.00 56.10 0.00 R3 0LA 0.00 71.45 0 med 0.21

sd 0.360839Z max 1.154701z min 0.57735

Repetitia Specia Zteor=1.41

MO LA H 10.09406R1 0.00 0.00 Hteor=39.0R2 56.10 71.45R3 0.00 0

SPECIA DENS LARmolid 0.624991larice 2.136955molid 0larice 1.788167

molid 0larice 0

P2 dens.intrari

Repetitia


9/65


10/65

n

molid pin larice

1 0 710 54 00 0 0

1 54 710.33 27.00 23.67

1 0 470 0 220 0 01 0 69

0.33 0.00 23.000.31 0.37 0.350.36 0.34 0.36

0.49 0.47 0.371.16 1.17 1.080.39 0.39 0.36

3.22 0 136.070.00 0 60.400.00 0.00 0.003.22 0.00 196.471.07 0.00 65.493.22 0 205.560.00 159.53 0.000.00 0 03.22 159.53 205.56

1.07 53.18 68.520 0 0

13 0 280 0 0

13 0 284.33 0.00 9.33

0 0 03 0 100 0 03 0 10

1.00 0.00 3.330.54 0.27 0.370.23 0.41 0.390.30 0.21 0.301.07 0.89 1.060.36 0.30 0.35

0.00 0 0.0012.95 0.00 25.520.00 0.00 0.00

12.95 0.00 25.524.32 0.00 8.510.00 0 0.00

56.10 0.00 71.450.00 0 0

56.10 0.00 71.45


11/65

18.70 0.00 23.8200 PIATA 1 (LARVE LEMN)

0.00DENS INTRARI

DENS CA

larice Repetitia molid pin larice136.07 R1 3.22 0 205.56 Repetitia60.40 R2 0.00 159.53 0.00 R10.00 R3 0.00 0 0 R2

65.49 med 1.07 53.18 68.52 R368.2 sd 1.857268 92.10532 118.7 med

1.035246 Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.154701 sd0.960567 z min 0.57735 0.57735 0.57735 Z max

Zteor=1.41 z min

H 4083.21 Zteor=1.41

Hteor=87.5 H

Hteor=39.0

larice Repetitia molid pin larice2.136955 R1 0.624991 0 2.3150441.788167 R2 0 2.205559 0 SPECIA

0 R3 0 0 01.31 med 0.21 0.74 0.77 MO1.1 sd 0.360839 1.27338 1.3 LA

0.722751 Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.1547011.141262 z min 0.57735 0.57735 0.57735

Zteor=1.41

H 13.72051 Repetitia

Hteor=87.5R1R2

R3VE SPECIA

R1 R2 R3MO 0.624991 0 0PI 0 2.205559 0LA 2.315044 0 0

Repetitia SpeciaMO PI LA

R1 0.624991 0 0R2 0 2.205559 0

R3 2.315044 0 0

Repetitia


12/65


13/65

0

0.000 0

0.000.00


14/65

PIATA2

ARVE DENS INTRARI

molid larice Repetitia molid larice

0.00 0.00 R1 0.00 0.0012.95 25.52 R2 56.10 71.450.00 0.00 R3 0.00 04.32 8.51 med 18.70 23.82

7.47437 14.7 sd 32.38894 41.31.154701 1.154701 Z max 1.154701 1.1547010.57735 0.57735 z min 0.57735 0.57735

Zteor=1.413.885447 H 1.622232

Hteor=39.0

SPECIAR1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3

0.00 12.95 0.00 MO 0.00 56.10 0.000.00 25.52 0.00 LA 0.00 71.45 0

Specia Repetitia SpeciaMO LA MO LA

0.00 0.00 R1 0.00 0.0012.95 25.52 R2 56.10 71.45

0.00 0.00 R3 0.00 0

Repetitia Repetitia


15/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:32:00 PMp1 dens lar Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$72:$G$74 / 3 row

Significance level: 0.05

Results for the sample molid :

Shapiro-Wilk Test:

W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05

Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.

Results for the sample pin :

Shapiro-Wilk Test:



Results for the sample larice:

Shapiro-Wilk Test:

W (observ 1.000One-tailed 0.967Alpha 0.05

Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis that tIn other words, the non-normality is not significant.


16/65

SOARTA SI LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normand 3 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = den


Results for the sample

Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa

In other words, the no


Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa



Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa



17/65

lity Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:48:39 PMitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$60:$L$62 / 3 rows and 3 columns

molid :

ce Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distributio-normality is significant.

pin :


larice:



18/65

.

.

.


19/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 1:20:19 AMData: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$101:$L$103 / 3 roNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

Friedman's test:

Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account

In case of small samples (


20/65

R1 R2 R3

R1R2 NSR3 NS NS

Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:37:42 PMData: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$96:$G$98 / 3 rowNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

Friedman's test:




21/65

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (difference):

R1 R2 R3R1R2 2.000

R3 2.000 4.000 0.000Critical value for the difference 4.801

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (conclusion):

R1 R2 R3 medR1 sdR2 NS R3 NS NS

Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant differDensitatea atacului ca nr. larve /media(SD)

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

Densitate

aatacului(larve/mpscoarta)

(mediaSD)


22/65

SCOARTA SI LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Sampless and 3 columns P1 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve

No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05

l Multiple comparisons tests: don't

Friedman's test:

Note: The calculation of the Fried



23/65

MO PI

MOPI NSLA NS NS

Note: NS = nonsignificant differen

P1 DESN LARVEXLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples

and 3 columns Data: workbook = densitate larveNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05

l Multiple comparisons tests: don't

Friedman's test:




24/65

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (di

MO PIMOPI 1.000

LA 5.000 4.000Critical value for the difference

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (cMolid Pin Larice

0.92 0.98 23.72 MO PI1.59609 1.705654 22.8 MO

PI NSLA NS

p scoarta Note: NS = nonsignificant differen

Molid Pin Larice

Specia

a

abb


25/65

Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 1:21:42 AM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$108:$L$110 / 3 rows and 3 columns

se the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

an's Q takes ties into account

u can consult a table published instatistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.d with the Friedman's Q is given pp. 280-281

a Chi-square

.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.een the samples is not significant.

4.801

fference):

LA

0.000

4.801

nclusion):


26/65

LA

e, = significant difference.

Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:39:03 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$102:$G$104 / 3 rows and 3 columns



u can consult a table published instatistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.d with the Friedman's Q is given pp. 280-281

a Chi-square

.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.een the samples is not significant.

4.801

BB

ups


27/65

fference):

LA

0.0004.801

nclusion):

LA



28/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:50:42 PMP2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $O$72:$Q$74 / 3 rowDENS LARSignificance level: 0.05


Shapiro-Wilk Test:




Shapiro-Wilk Test:




Shapiro-Wilk Test:




29/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 ats and 3 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s



Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d

In other words, the non-normality is significant


Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d


he sample follows a normal distribution.


30/65

3:51:07 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$60:$U$62 / 3 rows and 2 columns

cision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution..



31/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - ANOVA - 6/9/2011 at 1:28:38 AMP2 Dependent variable(s): workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $O$DENS LARUniform weighting (default)

Qualitative variables: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $N$8No missing valuesConstraints: a1 = 0

Type I SS, III SSPerform multiple comparison testsConfidence interval (%): 95.00

Modeling variable DENS LARVE :

Summary for the dependent variable:

Variable al no. of val of values u f values ig m of weig Mean dard deviation

DENS LAR 9 9 0 9 0.865 0.573

Summary for the qualitative variables:

Variable er of cate Categories requenciesSPECIA 3 in ~ larice 3 ~ 3 ~ 3

Goodness of fit coefficients:

R (coeffici 0.837R (coeffici 0.701Radj. (adj 0.601

SSR 0.787

Evaluating the information brought by the variables (H0 = Y=Moy(Y)):

Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FModel 2 1.843 0.921 7.027 0.027Residuals 6 0.787 0.131

Total 8 2.629

Model analysis (Type I SS):

Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FSPECIA 2 1.843 0.921 7.027 0.027

Model analysis (Type III SS):



32/65

Model parameters:

Parameter Value dard deviaStudent's t Pr > t er bound 9 er bound 95 %

Intercept 1.413 0.209 6.761 0.001 0.902 1.925

SPECIA-m 0.000 - - - - -SPECIA-pi -1.108 0.296 -3.748 0.010 -1.832 -0.385SPECIA-la -0.537 0.296 -1.817 0.119 -1.261 0.186

Multiple comparison tests for the variable SPECIA:

Tukey (HSD) / Analysis of the differences between groups with a confidence range of 95.00

Categories Difference rdized diff ritical valu Pr. > Diff Significantmolid ~ pi 1.108 3.748 3.068 0.022 Yesmolid ~ lar 0.537 1.817 3.068 0.242 No

larice ~ pin 0.571 1.931 3.068 0.210 NoTukey's d critical value: 4.339 med

sd

Sorting and grouping categories:

Categories Mean

molid 1.413 Alarice 0.876 A Bpin 0.305 B

Groupings

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

Densitateaatacului(lar

ve/mp)

(mediaSD)


33/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Pair84:$O$92 / 9 rows and 1 column P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = den

No missing values:$N$92 / 9 rows and 1 column FRIEDMAN Significance level: 0.05

Multiple comparisons t

Friedman's test:

Note: The calculation

In case of small samplSiegel (S.), 1956. NonThe table of the p-valu

Q (observe 4.000

Q (critical v 5.991

DF 2

One-tailed 0.135Alpha 0.05

The Friedman's Q is di

Conclusion:

At the level of significaIn other words, the diff

Multiple comparisons t

Critical value for the dif

Table of groups:

Sum of rankR3 3R1 3

R2 6

Matrix of pairwise com

R1R1

R2 3.000

R3 0.000

Critical value for the di

Matrix of pairwise com


34/65

R1

R1R2 NS

R3 NS

Note: NS = nonsignific

%:

Molid Pin Larice29.63 2.41 6.58

18.74233 4.178853 1.1

Molid Pin LariceSpecia

a

abb


35/65

d Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:57:49 PMitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$74:$V$75 / 2 rows and 3 columns

ests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

f the Friedman's Q takes ties into account

s (


36/65

R2 R3

NS

nt difference, = significant difference.


37/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:59:Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$81:$UNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall sig

Friedman's test:


Q (observe 1.000Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317

Alpha 0.05

The Friedman's Q is distributed as a Chi-square

Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypo

In other words, the difference between the samples is not significant.

samples. Multiple comparisons tests:

Critical value for the difference: 3.395

Table of groups:

Sum of rank GroupsMO 4 ALA 5 A


MO LA

MOLA 1.000 0.000

Critical value for the difference 3.395


MO LA

MOLA NS



38/65


39/65

2 PM$83 / 3 rows and 2 columns

ificant level

thesis of absence of difference between the 2 samples.


40/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 4:02:59 PMP1 DENS Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AA$72:$AB$74 / 3 rLARVE Significance level: 0.05


Shapiro-Wilk Test:




Shapiro-Wilk Test:




41/65

LARVE IN LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests -ws and 2 columns P1 Data: workbook = densitate larve

DENS INTRARI Significance level: 0.05


Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=

In other words, the non-normality i


Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=

In other words, the non-normality i


Shapiro-Wilk Test:


Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=In other words, the non-normality i


42/65

6/9/2011 at 4:04:17 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AE$72:$AG$74 / 3 rows and 3 columns

.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution.s significant.




43/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - ANOVA - 6/9/2011 at 1:34:36 AMP1 Dependent variable(s): workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AADENS L Uniform weighting (default)

Qualitative variables: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $Z$86No missing valuesConstraints: a1 = 0

Type I SS, III SSPerform multiple comparison testsConfidence interval (%): 95.00

Modeling variable DENS LARVE :

Summary for the dependent variable:

Variable al no. of val of values u f values ig m of weig Mean dard deviationDENS LAR 6 6 0 6 0.758 0.970

Summary for the qualitative variables:

Variable er of cate Categories requenciesSPECIA 2 lid ~ larice 3 ~ 3

Goodness of fit coefficients:

R (coeffici 0.621

R (coeffici 0.386Radj. (adj 0.232

SSR 2.889

Evaluating the information brought by the variables (H0 = Y=Moy(Y)):

Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FModel 1 1.815 1.815 2.513 0.188Residuals 4 2.889 0.722Total 5 4.704

Model analysis (Type I SS):


Model analysis (Type III SS):



44/65

Model parameters:

Parameter Value dard deviaStudent's t Pr > t er bound 9 er bound 95 %

Intercept 0.208 0.491 0.425 0.693 -1.154 1.571

SPECIA-m 0.000 - - - - -SPECIA-la 1.100 0.694 1.585 0.188 -0.827 3.027

Multiple comparison tests for the variable SPECIA:

Tukey (HSD) / Analysis of the differences between groups with a confidence range of 95.00

Categories Difference rdized diff ritical valu Pr. > Diff Significantlarice ~ mo 1.100 1.585 2.776 0.188 No

Tukey's d critical value: 3.927

Sorting and grouping categories:

Categories Mean Groupingslarice 1.308 Amolid 0.208 A


45/65


46/65

XLSTAT 7.$86:$AA$91 / 6 rows and 1 column P1 DENS I INTRARI Data: work

FRIEDMAN No missing:$Z$91 / 6 rows and 1 column Significanc

Multiple co

Friedman's

Note: The

In case of sSiegel (S.),The table o

Q (observeQ (critical v

DF

One-tailedAlpha

The Fried

Conclusion

At the levelIn other wo

Multiple co

Critical val

Table of gr

SR3R2R1

Matrix of p

R1

R2R3

Critical val

Matrix of p


47/65

R1R2

R3

Note: NS =

XLSTAT 7.Data: work

%: No missingSignificanc

Multiple co

Friedman's

Note: The

In case of sSiegel (S.),The table o

Q (observeQ (critical vDF

One-tailedAlpha

The Fried

ConclusionAt the levelIn other wo

Multiple co

Critical val

Table of gr

SLAPIMO


48/65

Matrix of p

MOPILA

Critical val

Matrix of p

MOPILA

Note: NS =


49/65

5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:06:12 PMook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AE$87:$AG$89 / 3 rows and 3 columnsvalueslevel: 0.05parisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

test:

alculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account

mall samples (


50/65

R1 R2 R3

NS

NS NS

nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.

5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:07:15 PMook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AE$94:$AG$96 / 3 rows and 3 columnsvalueslevel: 0.05

parisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

test:

alculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account

mall samples (


51/65

irwise comparisons (difference):

MO PI LA

1.5003.000 1.500 0.000

e for the difference 4.801

irwise comparisons (conclusion):

MO PI LA

NSNS NS

nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.


52/65

ween the 3 samples.


53/65

ween the 3 samples.


54/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 4:21:36 PMP2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AK$61:$AL$63 / 3 rDENS LARSignificance level: 0.05


Shapiro-Wilk Test:




Shapiro-Wilk Test:




55/65

LARVE LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 atws and 2 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s



Shapiro-Wilk Test:





Shapiro-Wilk Test:





56/65

4:22:05 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $AO$61:$AP$63 / 3 rows and 2 columns




57/65

P2 DENS XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:31:03 PMLARVE Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AK$75:$AM$76 / 2 r

No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level

Friedman's test:




58/65

R1 R2 R3

R1R2 NSR3 NS NS


XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:11:

Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AK$82:$No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall sig

Friedman's test:


Q (observe 1.000Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317

Alpha 0.05

The Friedman's Q is distributed as a Chi-square

Conclusion:

At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypoIn other words, the difference between the samples is not significant.

Multiple comparisons tests:

Critical value for the difference: 3.395

Table of groups:

Sum of rank GroupsMO 4 A

LA 5 A


MO LAMO

LA 1.000 0.000

Critical value for the difference 3.395


59/65


MO LAMO

LA NSNote: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.


60/65

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparisoows and 3 columns P2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s

DENS INT No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05

l Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bon

Friedman's test:

Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q tak



61/65

R1 R2 R3

R1R2 NSR3 NS NS

Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = sign

XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples2 PM Data: workbook = densitate larve

AL$84 / 3 rows and 2 columns No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't

ificant level

Friedman's test:


Q (observe 1.000

Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317Alpha 0.05

The Friedman's Q is distributed as

Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=

thesis of absence of dif ference between the 2 samples. In other words, the difference bet

Multiple comparisons tests:

Critical value for the difference:

Table of groups:

Sum of rank Groups

MO 4 ALA 5 A

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (di

MO LA

MOLA 1.000 0.000

Critical value for the difference


62/65

Matrix of pairwise comparisons (c

MO LA

MOLA NS

Note: NS = nonsignificant differen


63/65

n (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:29:42 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $AP$75:$AR$76 / 2 rows and 3 columns

erroni correction to the overall significant level

s ties into account

lt a table published inr the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.riedman's Q is given pp. 280-281

re

cision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.ples is not significant.


64/65

ficant difference.

Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:32:45 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AP$82:$AQ$84 / 3 rows and 2 columns



a Chi-square

.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 2 samples.

een the samples is not significant.

3.395

fference):

3.395


65/65

nclusion):


densitate larve 20.04

Documents