dementia research group mri, rates of atrophy and alzheimer’s disease nick fox dementia research...

29
Dementia Research Group Dementia Research Group MRI, rates of atrophy MRI, rates of atrophy and Alzheimer’s and Alzheimer’s disease disease Nick Fox Nick Fox Dementia Research Group Dementia Research Group Institute of Neurology, UCL Institute of Neurology, UCL Queen Square, London Queen Square, London England England

Upload: margaretmargaret-willis

Post on 24-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

MRI, rates of atrophy and MRI, rates of atrophy and Alzheimer’s diseaseAlzheimer’s disease

Nick FoxNick FoxDementia Research Group Dementia Research Group

Institute of Neurology, UCLInstitute of Neurology, UCL

Queen Square, LondonQueen Square, London

EnglandEngland

Atrophy rates and AD: Atrophy rates and AD: overviewoverview

• The relationship of atrophy rates to pathological The relationship of atrophy rates to pathological and clinical progression in untreated patientsand clinical progression in untreated patients

• Disease modification vs. symptomatic effect?Disease modification vs. symptomatic effect?• Is it reasonably likely that atrophy rate changes Is it reasonably likely that atrophy rate changes

would predict clinical benefit in would predict clinical benefit in treatedtreated patients? patients?• How might atrophy rates be uncoupled from How might atrophy rates be uncoupled from

clinical benefit? Can this be protected against? clinical benefit? Can this be protected against?

AD is characterised pathologically by AD is characterised pathologically by neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic amyloid neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic amyloid

plaques, synapse loss, dendritic pruning,cell plaques, synapse loss, dendritic pruning,cell loss and loss and atrophyatrophy……

MRI can visualise and MRI can visualise and measure atrophy ratesmeasure atrophy rates

Time 0 18months 36months

H

Serial coronal MRI of an individual with initially mild AD

MCI

Scan 1

MCI

Scan 2

AD

Scan 1

AD

Scan 2

6 months later

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

Controls AD

Rate of brain volume loss%/yr

2.8% (+/-1)2.8% (+/-1)

0.2% (+/-0.3)0.2% (+/-0.3)

ReproducibilityReproducibility

• Scan-rescan (a real test of Scan-rescan (a real test of reproducibility)reproducibility)

• Acquire a single scan and then two Acquire a single scan and then two further scans on the same day further scans on the same day one year one year laterlater

Scan Scan AA

Scan Scan CC

Scan Scan BB

BBSIBBSIABAB

BBSIBBSIAACC

y = 1.00x - 1.08

R > 0.9

-10

0

10

20

30

-10 0 10 20 30 40

First measure / cc

Repeat measure / cc

RMS Error = 1.6 ccRMS Error = 1.6 cc

y = 0.48x + 0.34

R = 0.8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12Fall in MMSE

% L

OS

S O

F B

RA

IN V

OL

UM

E Cognitive decline in ADcorrelates with rate of cerebral atrophy

Fox et al Neurology 1999;52:1687-9

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

At risk F206 (well)

Brain volume vs. time

89.0

91.0

93.0

95.0

97.0

99.0

101.0

0 500 1000 1500Days from first scan

%

AD: brain volume vs. time

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

0 500 1000 1500Days from first scan

%

Rate of atrophy predicts conversion to AD Rate of atrophy predicts conversion to AD in at-risk subjectsin at-risk subjects

Fox et al The Lancet 1999; 353:2125

93 94 95

96 4/97 11/97

AD: At risk subject - serial scans registered to 1993 baselineAD: At risk subject - serial scans registered to 1993 baseline

93

11/97

Red = lossRed = loss

65

70

75

80

85

90%

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Time since first scan (days)

Bra

in V

olu

me

as p

erce

nta

ge

of

TIV

symptomssymptomssymptomssymptoms

Normal range: 95%CI

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

88

90

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

TIME SINCE BASELINE SCAN (DAYS)

BR

AIN

VO

LU

ME

AS

A P

ER

CE

NT

AG

E O

F T

IV

Normal control range

Symptom onset

Fulfils clinical criteria for AD

Scahill et al PNAS 2001

Cerebral atrophy rates on MRI Cerebral atrophy rates on MRI and clinical progression in ADand clinical progression in AD

• Atrophy progression in untreated ADAtrophy progression in untreated AD– Is inexorableIs inexorable– And correlates with cell loss And correlates with cell loss

• MR-based measures are reliable and sensitive to MR-based measures are reliable and sensitive to change at a clinically meaningful levelchange at a clinically meaningful level

• Rates of cerebral atrophy on MRRates of cerebral atrophy on MR– Are increased in ADAre increased in AD– Predict conversion to AD Predict conversion to AD – Correlate with cognitive declineCorrelate with cognitive decline– Biologically plausible: regional specific atrophy reflects Biologically plausible: regional specific atrophy reflects

pathological and clinical progressionpathological and clinical progression

Differentiating Disease Slowing Differentiating Disease Slowing From Symptomatic BenefitFrom Symptomatic Benefit

• Is benefit sustained?Is benefit sustained?

• Are Are allall disease effects modified? disease effects modified?

• Disease modifying effects take place Disease modifying effects take place nearer the causal end of the processnearer the causal end of the process

Diseaseprocess

Diseaseeffects

Clinical outcomes

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

““a surrogate … should capture a surrogate … should capture the full effects… …on the the full effects… …on the

clinical outcome”clinical outcome”• Can change in one happen without Can change in one happen without

change in the other?change in the other?

• Are changes correlated?Are changes correlated?

• Clinically meaningful?Clinically meaningful?

• Are measures sensitive? Are measures sensitive?

• Feasible?Feasible?

Neuronal degeneration is Neuronal degeneration is closely linked to progression of closely linked to progression of

cognitive declinecognitive decline

Pathological process Cell loss

Cognitive decline

and death

Synapse loss

Destruction of Destruction of neuronal networksneuronal networks

Could volume change occur Could volume change occur without neuronal loss in AD?without neuronal loss in AD?

Neurones

Other cells

Water Protein

Yes – neuronal loss is not the sole determinate of cerebral volume – e.g. inflammation, hydration, osmotic effects…

3% cerebral volume change after haemodialysis

Walters, Fox et al Nephron 2001;87:143-7

Atrophy and progressionAtrophy and progression• Neuronal changes are neither necessary Neuronal changes are neither necessary

nor sufficient to produce volume changesnor sufficient to produce volume changes

• However However progressiveprogressive volume loss is more volume loss is more likely to be related to likely to be related to progressionprogression in in neuronal lossneuronal loss

• >2 imaging time points>2 imaging time points

• Including off treatmentIncluding off treatment80

85%

50 100 150 200

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

It is reasonably likely thatIt is reasonably likely that

• A measure of slowed neuronal loss would A measure of slowed neuronal loss would predict clinical outcome and that slowing predict clinical outcome and that slowing would constitute disease modificationwould constitute disease modification

• A slowed rate of neuronal loss would result in A slowed rate of neuronal loss would result in reduced atrophy ratesreduced atrophy rates

• If the reduction in atrophy rate followed the If the reduction in atrophy rate followed the region- and time-related pattern of the region- and time-related pattern of the pathology then it would be reasonable to pathology then it would be reasonable to conclude that clinical outcome would also be conclude that clinical outcome would also be improvedimproved

Dementia Research GroupDementia Research Group

SummarySummary• Atrophy rates correlate with and predict Atrophy rates correlate with and predict

progression in untreated patientsprogression in untreated patients• The causality of the link between The causality of the link between

neurodegeneration and atrophy is plausibleneurodegeneration and atrophy is plausible• It may be reasonable, with appropriate study It may be reasonable, with appropriate study

designs, to suggest changes in rate of atrophy are designs, to suggest changes in rate of atrophy are due to reduced neuronal degeneration and are due to reduced neuronal degeneration and are likely to predict clinical benefit likely to predict clinical benefit

• Inevitably disease modifying drug(s) are required Inevitably disease modifying drug(s) are required to strengthen the link between atrophy rates and to strengthen the link between atrophy rates and disease modificationdisease modification