define future: finding the common ground between it and digital preservation
DESCRIPTION
Presentation for MCN 2008 session on Digital Curation. Digital Curation is a new field devoted to preservation of digital assets. It negotiates between the expertise of content specialists and IT. This presentation looks at the sometimes conflicting priorities of IT and digital preservation and considers how these differences might be resolved.TRANSCRIPT
Define "Future" Finding the Common Ground Between IT and Digital Preservation
Chuck PatchMuseum Computer Network
Washington DC November 2008
Roles
Information Technologist Archivist / Records Manager Data Creator Digital Curator Museum Curator
MCN 2008 Washington DC 2
Characteristics (Stereotypes?) of IT
What IT deals with: Top priority is data infrastructure
Plan Select Implement Support (Start over)
Provide Information Systems solutions in response to client requests
Clients are “Content Specialists” IT helps clients achieve their goals
MCN 2008 Washington DC 3
Characteristics (Stereotypes?) of IT
MCN 2008 Washington DC
How IT approaches tasks: Bottom – up approach to problem solving
Define the PROBLEM and develop a plan Analyze and model processes Design a solution Implement Support it Start over from the beginning
Characteristics (Stereotypes?) of Archivists and Records Managers
What archivists and RM’s deal with: Top priority is the “knowledge”
infrastructure Systems of documentation essential
to business activities Satisfaction of legal requirements Identification of historical importance
of systems of information Create solutions pro-actively
Clients are “Content Specialists” Archivists help the organization
retain its identity
MCN 2008 Washington DC 5
Characteristics (Stereotypes?) of Archivists and Records Managers
How Archives and RM approach tasks: Understand the organization’s functions from the top
down Identify the key activities within the organization Understand the business processes that produce
documents and records from the bottom up Work with data creators to create categories and
classifications for information from the time “records” are created (scheduling)
Make judgments about what should be kept and for how long (appraisal)
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Where IT and RM / Archives Intersect
ALL data is now digital Digital object preservation requires both
archival and IT involvement IT for all technical aspects
Back-end data storage Systems to support long-term preservation
Archival to identify critical steps in the electronic records creation process
Archival to help organize the masses of digital information accumulating in network drives
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Where IT and RM / Archives Don’t Intersect
Time Horizon Information Technology
The future = 5 Years? The distant future = 10 years?
Records Manager Scheduled retention
Archivist The future = Forever?
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Where IT and RM / Archives Don’t Intersect
For IT “content” matters primarily in regard to system function:
How does it effect bandwidth? How much storage does it require? What systems support it?
IT has no formal appraisal method for content as it relates to business function
IT does have formal or at least defacto appraisal methods as it relates to system function
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Tradition (-al misconceptions)
World divided into physical and digital Digital “belonged” to IT Physical data belonged to archivist and
curator “Record”, “Archival” = physical = paper Artifacts belonged to curators
“Records” are “dead” objects Nobody has to deal with them until they
aren’t useful (active) anymore
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Life –Cycle vs Records Continuum View of Document Management
MCN 2008 Washington DC 11
Archivist / Records ManagerArchivist / Records Manager
Characteristics of the Data Creator
“Important” stuff is printed out and filed according to RM guidance
Absence of guidance re: digital information leaves organization to the data creator
How to organize file directories Where to put them How to back them up File Naming conventions
Long – term information management may not be a first priority
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Characteristics of the Data Creator
Files frequently have version identity problems
Less than ideal file management coupled with less than ideal physical output
Filing and categorization idiosyncratic Rarely matches to organizational standards Rarely matches that of other users
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Email – Proving the rule
In most organizations the province of IT Never designed for permanent
management of messages or files Users realized from the first that it was a
great organizing tool Really easy, intuitive metadata
To, From, Subject, Date, description (message body) Built in directory structure Great place to store documents (attachments)
MCN 2008 Washington DC
But…
An organizer, but not a permanent one
“Archiving” Hardly anyone uses it In proprietary format Those who do store
them on the C drive No one manages the
archives
MCN 2008 Washington DC
Progress
IT reacts to content issues Content issues are raised by stake holders If it can be “databased” it can be brought
under control Collections Management Digital Asset Management Content Management Electronic Records Management
Solutions, whatever their names, derive from specific user communities, all speaking digital
MCN 2008 Washington DC
What the Heck is a “Digital Curator”
Rarely seen in the wild Not a person but a role – Maybe an
organizing principle Concerned with the long-term
preservation of digital objects Involved in appraisal of digital objects
Not necessarily the same kind appraisal used by a Records Manager or Archivist
Many aspects of digital curation subsumed in the work of archivists and records managers, IT specialists
MCN 2008 Washington DC 17
The Principles:
Nearly all information we create is in digital format
Everything else is a derivative There is no tactile digital original Digital objects change their names as often as their
formats Not all digital objects that are not records
should be regarded as temporary Management of digital objects must begin at
creation The “M” word
MCN 2008 Washington DC
The Open Archival Information System (OAIS) reference model
MCN 2008 Washington DC 19
Digital Repositories
Most organizations are unprepared to implement digital repositories (or even think about them!) Inadequate institutional organization Poor high and low level understanding of
the issues Inadequate policy development Lack of technical skills
MCN 2008 Washington DC
While waiting for the repository…
Create simple policies for Location of different categories of data Directory layouts File naming Develop categories and use them
everywhere Apply metadata using simple tools you can
find around the office
MCN 2008 Washington DC
RSM (Really Simple Metadata)
MCN 2008 Washington DC 22
Educating the digital curator
Requires some IT knowledge Requires archival and RM concepts AND
IF you’re in a museum…
DIGITAL ART.
MCN 2008 Washington DC
MCN 2008 Washington DC