decision analysis a. a. elimam college of business san francisco state university

23
Decision Analysis Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam A. A. Elimam College of Business College of Business San Francisco State University San Francisco State University

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision AnalysisDecision Analysis

A. A. ElimamA. A. ElimamCollege of BusinessCollege of Business

San Francisco State UniversitySan Francisco State University

Page 2: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Characteristics of a Good Characteristics of a Good DecisionDecision

Based on Logic Considers all Possible Alternatives Uses all Available Data Applies Quantitative Approach

Decision Analysis Frequently results in a favorable outcome

Page 3: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Analysis (DA) StepsDecision Analysis (DA) Steps

Clearly define the problem List all possible alternatives Identify possible outcomes Determine payoff for each

alternative/outcome Select one of the DA models Apply model to make decision

Page 4: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Types of Decision Making (DM)Types of Decision Making (DM)

DM under Certainty: Select the alternative with the Maximum payoff

DM under Uncertainty: Know nothing about probability

DM under Risk: Only know the probability of occurrence of each outcome

Page 5: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Table ExampleDecision Table Example

200,000

100,000

0

-180,000

-20,000

0

Favorable($) Unfavorable($)Alternatives

Large Plant

Small Plant

Do Nothing

State of Nature (Market)

Page 6: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Making Under RiskDecision Making Under Risk

Expected Monetary Value (EMV)

EMV (Alternative i) =

(Payoff of first State of Nature-SN) x (Prob. of first SN) + (Payoff of second SN) x (Prob. of Second SN) + (Payoff of third State of Nature-SN) x (Prob. of third SN) + . . . + (Payoff of last SN) x (Prob. of last SN)

Page 7: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Thompson Lumber ExampleThompson Lumber Example

EMV(Large F.) =

(0.50)($200,000)+(0.5)(-180,000)= $10,000

EMV(Small F.) =

(0.50)($100,000)+(0.5)(-20,000)= $40,000

EMV(Do Nothing) =

(0.50)($0)+(0.5)(0)= $0

Page 8: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Thompson LumberThompson Lumber

200,000

100,000

0

-180,000

-20,000

0

Favorable ($) Unfavorable ($)Alternatives

Large Plant

Small Plant

Do Nothing

State of Nature (Market)

EMV ($)

Probabilities 0.5 0.5

10,000

40,000

Page 9: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Expected Value of PerfectExpected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) Information (EVPI)

Expected Value with Perfect Information =

(Best Outcome for first SN) x (Prob. of first SN) + (Best Outcome for second SN) x (Prob. of Second SN) +

. . . + (Best Outcome for last SN) x (Prob. of last SN)

Page 10: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Expected Value of Perfect Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI)Information (EVPI)

EVPI = Expected Outcome with Perfect Information - Expected Outcome without Perfect Information

EVPI = Expected Value with Perfect Information - Maximum EMV

Page 11: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Thompson LumberThompson LumberExpected Value of Perfect Information

Best Outcome For Each SN •Favorable: Large plant, Payoff = $200,000 •Unfavorable: Do Nothing, Payoff = $0

So Expected Value with Perfect Info.

= (0.50)($200,000)+(0.5)(0)= $100,000

The Max. EMV = $ 40,000 EVPI = $100,000 - $40,000 = $ 60,000

Page 12: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Table ExampleDecision Table Example

200

160

0

270

800

0

Low ($) High ($)Alternative

Small Facility

Large Facility

Do Nothing

Possible Future Demand

Page 13: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Example A.5Example A.5

200

160

0

270

800

0

Low ($) High ($)Alternatives

Small

Large

Do Nothing

Demand

EMV ($)

Probabilities 0.4 0.6

242

544

Page 14: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Example A.8Example A.8Expected Value of Perfect Information

Best Outcome For Each SN •High Demand: Large , Payoff = $800 •Low Demand : Small , Payoff = $200

So Expected Value with Perfect Info.

= (0.60)($800)+(0.4)(200)= $560

The Max. EMV = $ 544 EVPI = $ 560 - $ 544 = $ 16

Page 15: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Opportunity Loss : Thompson LumberOpportunity Loss : Thompson Lumber

200,000-200,000

200,000-100,000

200,000-0

0-(-180,000)

0-(-20,000)

0 - 0

Favorable ($) Unfavorable($)

State of Nature (Market)

Page 16: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Opportunity Loss : Thompson LumberOpportunity Loss : Thompson Lumber

0

100,000

200,000

180,000

20,000

0

Favorable ($) Unfavorable ($)Alternatives

Large Plant

Small Plant

Do Nothing

State of Nature (Market)

EOL ($)

Probabilities 0.5 0.5

90,000

60,000

100,000

Page 17: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity AnalysisEMV, $

0

-100,000

1

Values of P

-200,000

100,000

200,000

EMV(LF)

EMV(DN)

EMV(SF)

Point 2, p=0.62 Point 1

p=0.167

Page 18: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

One Time DecisionOne Time Decision

Fruit Baskets: GivenDemand and Associated ProbabilitiesCost = $ 10/ unit Selling Price = $ 15/unitFind the Quantity yielding Maximum EMV

Probability 0.3 0.5 0.2Demand, DQuantity,Q

10 25 40 EMV

10 $50 $50 $50 $5025 -$100 $125 $125 $57.5040 -$250 -$25 $200 -$47.5

Page 19: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision TreesDecision Trees

Decision Table: Only Columns-Rows

Columns: State of Nature

Rows: Alternatives- 1 Decision ONLY

For more than one Decision Trees

Decision Trees can handle a sequence of one or more decision(s)

Page 20: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision TreesDecision Trees

Two Types of Nodes

Selection Among Alternatives

State of Nature

Branches of the Decision Tree

Page 21: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Tree: ExampleDecision Tree: Example

SmallLarge

Do Nothing

Unfavorable (0.5)

F. (0.5)

Favorable (0.5)

U. (0.5)

U. (0.5)

F. (0.5)

Page 22: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

A Decision Tree for Capacity ExpansionA Decision Tree for Capacity Expansion(Payoff in thousands of dollars)(Payoff in thousands of dollars)

Low demand [0.40]$70

High demand [0.60]

($135)

2

Low demand [0.40]$40

High demand [0.60]$220

($109)

($148)

($148)

1

Don’t expand$90

Expand$135

Small expansion

Large expansion

Page 23: Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University

Decision Tree for RetailerDecision Tree for Retailer

3

2

1

Low demand [0.4]$200

Don’t expand$223

Expand$270

Do nothing$40

AdvertiseModest response [0.3]

$20

Sizable response [0.7]

$220

High demand [0.6]$800

($544)

($544)

($160)

($160)

($270)

($242)

Large facility Low demand

[0.4]

Small facil

ityHigh demand

[0.6]