ddh

82
Dr. Sushil Paudel Management of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip

Upload: dr-sushil-paudel

Post on 08-May-2015

4.419 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DDH

• Dr. Sushil Paudel Management of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip

Page 2: DDH

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) : spectrum of disorders of development of hip that present in different forms at different ages

Structures that make up hip are normal during embryogenesis and gradually become abnormal for a variety of reasons, chiefly fetal position and presentation at birth (malposition of the femoral head, abnormal forces acting on developing hip) and laxity of ligamentous structures about hip joint

Page 3: DDH

Evolves over timeSyndrome in newborn:

instability of hip; subluxated or dislocated, dislocated position and be reducible on examination

Over time, femoral head becomes fully dislocated and cannot be reduced by changing position of the hip

Page 4: DDH

Teratologic dislocation of the hip: distinct form of hip dislocation that usually occurs with other disorders

Dislocated before birth, have limited range of motion, and are not reducible on examination.

Associated with other neuromuscular syndromes, as myelodysplasia and arthro-gryposis

Page 5: DDH

Affected hip slides in &outFlattenened posterior border

of acetabulumLoose capsule

Everted labrumbirth

uncorrectedcorrected

Secondary barriers

DOCKING OF THE FEMORAL HEAD

NEOLIMBUS(CLUNK)

PATHOGENESIS

Page 6: DDH

SECONDARY BARRIERS

PULVINARLIGAMENTUM TERESTR.ACETABULAR LIGINVERTED LABRUM

CAPSULEILIOPSOAS

REDUCED-DOCKING

POINT OF REDUCIBILITY:?HARRIS et al: 4 yrs

HOURGLASS CONSTRICTION“CHINESE FINGER TRAP”

Page 7: DDH

UNREDUCED

ACETABULAR ROOF FLATTENINGTHICKENED MEDIAL WALLDYSTROPHIC CARTILAGE

SUBCHONDRAL CYSTSLOSS OF CARTILAGE

OSTEOPHYTES

ACETABULARCHANGES

Page 8: DDH

Management

Page 9: DDH

Making the Diagnosis

High index of suspicionIdentifying risk factorsCareful physical

examinationProvactive dynamic

testsRisk baby evaluation by

USGRadiological evaluation

Page 10: DDH

Clinical Features : Neonates

BARLOW’S TEST ( bahar lo)

Page 11: DDH

Clinical Features : Neonates

BARLOW’S TEST ( bahar lo)

Page 12: DDH

Clinical Features : Neonates

ORTOLANI SIGN

Page 13: DDH

Clinical Features : Neonates

ORTOLANI SIGN

Page 14: DDH

Clinical Features : Neonates

Delicate “clunk” that is palpable but not audible

Repeat sequence 4-5 times to be certain of findings

If both signs negative but pt is high risk : follow up is essential

Page 15: DDH

Clinical features : InfantsProgression from

instability to dislocation is gradual process

In some within a few weeks

others the hip dislocation remains reducible up to 5 or 6 months of age.

When the hip no longer reducible, specific physical findings appear

Page 16: DDH

Limitation of Abduction

MOST RELIABLE SIGN

Page 17: DDH

Galeazzi’s Sign

Page 18: DDH

Asymmetric gluteal, thigh, labial folds

Page 19: DDH

Telescopy

Page 20: DDH

Klisic’s Test

Page 21: DDH

Walking child:

LLD↓AbductionTip-toe-walkingTrendelenberg gaitWaddling [B/L]↑lumbar lordosis

Page 22: DDH

Clinical Features : Walking Child

• Trendelenburg's sign

• Trendelenburg gait

Page 23: DDH

Radiological evaluation Dysplasia Subluxation Dislocation

Each stage has a different radiological presentation

Page 24: DDH

Ultrasonography

– lpha angle measures bony acetabuluBeta angle measures cartilagenous acetabulum

Page 25: DDH

Ultrasonography

• Harcke & Kumar technique:– Dynamic examination with stress views that mirror

Barlow’s & Ortolani’s maneuver

Graf classification

Page 26: DDH

RadiographsNewborns 27.5 degrees6 months 23.5 degrees2 years 20 degrees

Page 27: DDH

Centre – Edge Angle Wiberg

6 – 13 years >19 degrees>14 years > 25 degrees

Page 28: DDH

ANDREN-von ROSEN LINE

AP X-ray: hip in 45°abduction and IR Describes the longitudinal relationship between long axis of femur and acetabulum

Page 29: DDH

Imaging

• Radiographs

Page 30: DDH

Imaging

• Radiographs

Page 31: DDH

Imaging

• Radiographs

Page 32: DDH

Imaging

• Radiographs

Page 33: DDH

Imaging

• Acetabular Index

Page 34: DDH

Imaging

• Acetabular Index

Page 35: DDH

Imaging

• Acetabular Index

< 30 wnl

Page 36: DDH

Tear dropAP X-rayLateral:wall of acetabulumMedial:lesser pelvisInferior :acetabular notch

Appears between 6-23 mo[delayed in DDH]V-shaped in DDH

Page 37: DDH

False Profile view

Page 38: DDH

Arthrogram Severin [1941]Normal appearance:LABRUM:*Thorn over the

femoral head

*A recess of joint capsule overlies the thorn

Page 39: DDH

Arthrogram in DDH

SUBLUXATED HIP DISLOCATED HIP

Page 40: DDH

Imaging Tools

• CT scan:– Single section CT as check films– Neglected C.D.H.– Adolescent and adult

• MRI:– Equivalent to arthrography

Page 41: DDH

Diagnosis

Reduction

maintain

Intervene adverse natural history

Ensure normal adult hip

Page 42: DDH

Screening

• All neonates should have a clinical examination for hip instability

• Risk factors :– breech presentation– family history– torticollis– oligohydramnios– metatarsus adductus

USG SCREENING

Page 43: DDH

CLINICAL USG

normal normal

&

normal ABnormal

REPEAT AT 6 WKS

normalABnormal

REPEAT AT 3 & 6 WKS

Clinical & USG normal

ABnormal

Closed / open reduction

F/U till maturityABnormal

Page 44: DDH

Infant 1 – 6 months of Age

First choice is PAVLIK harness

Ensure hip > 90 degrees flexion

AP radiograph Does not have to be

reducible initially

Page 45: DDH

Infant 1 – 6 months of age

weekly clinical examination & USGBy 3 weeks stable reduction mustContinue till radiographs show normal

acetabulum

Results : 95% of initially dysplastic hips normal 80% dislocated and not initially reducible were successfully reduced Higher dislocations had a higher failure rate The rate of AVN was 2.38%.

Grill F, Bensahel H, Canadell J, et al: J Pediatr Orthop 1988; 8:1.

Page 46: DDH

Pavlik harness

Standard of treatment worldwideUpto 6 months Contraindicated when there is major muscle

imbalance (myelomeningocele, AMC or ligamentous laxity)

Page 47: DDH

Complications of Pavlik Harness

• AVN• Failure to reduce• Femoral nerve

neuropathy• Inferior dislocation• Pavlik’s disease (flattening

posterolateral acetabulum)

Page 48: DDH

Follow upThe child should be followed till

skeletal maturity

Increased risk of asymmetric physeal closureValgus deformity of the neck

Page 49: DDH

Child 6 months to 2 years of age

• Closed or open reduction + adductor tenotomy

• If closed reduction fails then surgeon should be prepared for an open procedure

Page 50: DDH

Closed reduction

Force should be avoidedCheck for safe zonePost reduction:

Spica change every six weeks plus stability check

Continue spica for 3-4 months

Page 51: DDH

Safe Zone

20 to 30 degrees frommaximum abduction

extended to below 90 degreeswithout redislocation

Safe zone can be improvedwith adductor tenotomy

Page 52: DDH

Open reduction

Unable to achieve closed reduction

Widening of the joint space

Unstable reductionsLoss of reduction on

follow upAdvanced age

Page 53: DDH

Approach

MedialMinimal dissectionObstructions

encountered directly

BUT.. Limited viewMFCA violationNo capsulorrhaphySecondary procedures

AnteriorBetter exposureCapsulorrhaphyPelvic osteotomy

possible BUT..

Blood loss Iliac crest apophysis and

abductors damageStiffness of hip

Page 54: DDH

Medial approach

Page 55: DDH

Anterior approach

• Smith-Peterson anterior approach

• Stood the test of time• More commonly used • Bikini incision better

cosmetic results

Page 56: DDH
Page 57: DDH
Page 58: DDH

Open Reduction with Femoral Shortening

• Pressure leads to risk of AVN• Better results than preoperative traction in older

children with less morbidityWhen to do??

• Anticipated increased pressure on reduced femur head• Recommended in child > 2yrs.• distract the joint few millimeter per operatively• Judge the tightness of soft tissues after reduction• irreducible dislocation

Page 59: DDH

How much shortening?

• Pre op: bottom of the femoral head to the floor of the acetabulum (a to b)

• amount of overlap is noted after osteotomy• Tension of the soft tissue• Derotation usually combined

leaving 15 to 20 degrees of anteversion

Page 60: DDH

Derotational femoral shortening osteotomy

Page 61: DDH

2 Years of Age and Older

• For child 2 -3 years of age, during open reduction acetabular coverage if insufficient warrants reorientation osteotomy

• If coxa valga with excessive anteversion, VDRO may be done.

• Children > 3 years usually need an osteotomy

Page 62: DDH
Page 63: DDH

Bilateral untreated dislocation upto 5 years: Open reduction with femoral shortening with

salter / pemberton osteotomy with gap of 5-6 weeks.

Bilateral untreated subluxation upto 5-6 years: Open reduction + salter osteotomy.

Page 64: DDH

Residual Dysplasia

Pelvic osteotomy

Re- orientation

Innominate

Periacetabular Triple

Augmentation

Shelf procedures Chiari

Page 65: DDH

Acetabular Reorientation-Innominate Osteotomy

• Articular hyaline cartilage over femur head• Types:– Salter’s (innominate)– Sutherland’s (double innominate)

Page 66: DDH

Salter’s Osteotomy

Redirects the entire acetabulumRoof “covers” the femoral head anteriorly and

superiorlyHinge at pubic symphysis

Pre-requisites Congrous Concentric reduction No Contractures

Page 67: DDH

Salter’s osteotomy

Page 68: DDH

Salter’s osteotomy

Page 69: DDH

Sutherland’s Osteotomy

1. Can be done for older child

2. Allows medial displacement

Page 70: DDH

Peri-acetabular Ostetomies

• Provide greater correction of acetabular index• Reduce volume of hip joint• Possibility of growth disturbances

Types– Pemberton’s – Dial (Eppright) – Wagner – Dega’s– Ganz osteotomy (Bernese)

Page 71: DDH

Pemberton’s Osteotomy

Page 72: DDH

Pemberton’s Osteotomy

1. Incomplete2. Hinges at

triradiate cartilage

Page 73: DDH

Dega’s Osteotomy

1. Incomplete2. Variable hinge3. Allows anterior,

lateral & posteriorcoverage

Page 74: DDH

Ganz Osteotomy

Larger corrections all directions

Blood supply preserved

Shape of true pelvis unaltered

Technically demanding

Page 75: DDH

Triple Osteotomies

Indication : Adolescent requiring more than 25° correctionPre-requisite:

Functional range of motiononly mild subluxation acceptable

Types:• Steel (Inferior)• Tonnis (Posterior)• Tachdjian - subinguinal adductor

Page 76: DDH

Triple Osteotomies

STEEL TONNIS TACHDJIAN’S

Page 77: DDH

Shelf Procedure

Page 78: DDH

Chiari Osteotomy

Page 79: DDH
Page 80: DDH

Adolescent and young adult(older then 8-10 years

If femoral head cannot be repositioned distally to the level of acetabulum : Salvage procedures

Degenertive arthritis and enough pain and limitation of movements – reconstructive operation (total hip replacement)

Arthodesis – rarely done, contraindiacted for bilateral dislocation

Page 81: DDH

Schanz osteotomy

Very late salvage

Page 82: DDH

Joint replacementConsider for: Severe arthritis Failed “

conservative” Rx. Bilateral disease