day2_geohistory

42
Petroleum Systems Models: visual representations of data that tell us something about petroleum potential and/or occurrences in a sedimentary basin. Key aspects: burial history, thermal history, maturation predictions, migration pathways and much more.

Upload: dani-torres-c

Post on 01-Dec-2015

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Day2_Geohistory

Petroleum Systems Models: visual representations of data that tell us something about petroleum potential and/or occurrences in a sedimentary basin.

Key aspects: burial history, thermal history, maturation predictions, migration pathways and much more.

Page 2: Day2_Geohistory
Page 3: Day2_Geohistory
Page 4: Day2_Geohistory
Page 5: Day2_Geohistory
Page 6: Day2_Geohistory
Page 7: Day2_Geohistory
Page 8: Day2_Geohistory
Page 9: Day2_Geohistory

Basin Modeling Week 2: Subsidence and Geohistory Modeling (part one)

1. ReviewIsostacy (Airy/Pratt). Local compensation Principle of isostatic compensation – applied to basinsSubsidence mechanisms

2. Geohistory Analysis: what is it and why is it useful?

3. Early approaches to geohistory analysis

4. How-To: Geohistory analysis made easy (1D/backstripping)

Readings – all are online:Van Hinte, 1978Angevine et al., 1990. AAPG Continuing Ed. Course Notes, available online at:

http://faculty.gg.uwyo.edu/heller/shortcourse(90).htmAllen and Allen textbook Ch. 2, 9

Homework (due next week):Create your own 1 page ‘cheat sheet’ or personal reference guide for geohistory

modeling.

Page 10: Day2_Geohistory

(Angevine et al., 1990)

Fundamental cause of subsidence = isostacy.

Isostatic compensation: below a certain depth, asthenosphere of equal density underlies both columns (amount displaced is related to load). Above this depth, both columns must have equal weights.

Mass column 1 = Mass column 2

So, crustal topography is controlled by density and thickness variations of the crust.

1) Review

Page 11: Day2_Geohistory

(Angevine et al., 1990)

Air (p=0 g/cc): Z=0.9 kmWater (p=1 g/cc): Z= 1.3 kmSediment (p=2.3 g/cc): Z=3 km

Page 12: Day2_Geohistory

Isostatic models (local compensation): density vs thickness variations.

Geohistory modeling assumes local Airy isostatic balance.

Review cont’d

Page 13: Day2_Geohistory

Regional isostacy and flexural loads (subsidence)

Review cont’d

Page 14: Day2_Geohistory

Review: subsidence mechanisms

Page 15: Day2_Geohistory

2) Intro to Geohistory Analysis

What is a geohistory diagram?

A graphical representation of the vertical movement of a stratigraphic horizon in a sedimentary basin as an indicator of subsidence and uplift history in the basin since the horizon was deposited (Angevine et al., 1990).

3) Early attempts

Page 16: Day2_Geohistory

Van Hinte, 1978

Van Hinte diagram

Page 17: Day2_Geohistory

Van Hinte diagram

Page 18: Day2_Geohistory

Example: generating a geohistory diagramA) : What data do you need to collect?

Page 19: Day2_Geohistory

• Formation Information: thickness, lithology, age

• Pet Sys Components

Page 20: Day2_Geohistory

• Heat flow – modern vsancient, paleogeography

Mean geothermal gradient in the upper 1 to 4 km of the crust in the U.S. (Blackwell et al., 1996).

Page 21: Day2_Geohistory

Geohistory modeling with missing time

??

Page 22: Day2_Geohistory

Paleobathymetry

Page 23: Day2_Geohistory

A) Gather (good) data

B) Create uncorrected sediment accumulation curve

Page 24: Day2_Geohistory

B) Create uncorrected sediment accumulation curve

Page 25: Day2_Geohistory

B) Create uncorrected sediment accumulation curve, then

C) Make incremental decompaction corrections to get true ‘original’ thicknesses of each section

What controls compaction?

Page 26: Day2_Geohistory

Porosity assumptions

Page 27: Day2_Geohistory

C) The ‘correct’ method of decompaction.

(use iteration to solve)

Assumptions: porosity (phi) decreases exponentially with depth, and volume of grains (1-phi) does not change

Page 28: Day2_Geohistory

C) The ‘correct’ method of decompaction.

(use iteration to solve – 23% difference in decompacted thickness)

Step To (solved) To (approx) difference1 928.68 800 128.682 970.4502 928.68 41.770223 983.4414 970.4502 12.99124 987.4268 983.4414 3.9854645 988.6443 987.4268 1.2174886 989.0158 988.6443 0.3714377 989.129 989.0158 0.1132758 989.1636 989.129 0.0345419 989.1741 989.1636 0.010532

10 989.1773 989.1741 0.003211

Solving for Unit 6 (shale, 800 meters present thickness) after removing unit 7

To=-1000*EXP(-5*10^-4*To)+1599

Page 29: Day2_Geohistory

Approximation Method for compaction correctionNow (‘new’)

Decompacted(‘old’ or original)

ΦN = Φo e (-c z)

Page 30: Day2_Geohistory

C) Decompaction equations: Approximation method (Van Hinte).

To = [(1-ΦN)TN]/[1-Φo]

Phi - Calculate or est from chart:ΦN = Φo e (-c z)

* Assumptions and equations…

Page 31: Day2_Geohistory

Decompactionexercise

(approximation method)

(or use the chart ->)

To = [(1-ΦN)TN]/[1-Φo]

Phi - Calculate or est from chart:ΦN = Φo e (-c z)

Page 32: Day2_Geohistory

C) Now we have a decompacted sediment accumulation curve (sort of)What about compaction due to water load?

Page 33: Day2_Geohistory
Page 34: Day2_Geohistory

Corrected cumulative subsidence curve by accounting for paleobathymetry as well as decompaction

Page 35: Day2_Geohistory

Can predict basin depths (Z) filled with materials of variable density (air, water, sediment). Z Air (0.9), Z Water (1.3), Z sediment (3) so Zw = 1.5 Za; Zs = 2.3 Zw. Ratios between Za, Zw, and Zs remain the same…

D) Corrections for subsidence due to sediment + water load = backstripping

Page 36: Day2_Geohistory

The backstripping equation

Page 37: Day2_Geohistory

How do we determine variable density of sediment load through time?

Following Steckler and Watts (1978)

Page 38: Day2_Geohistory

Example of backstripping exercise

Page 39: Day2_Geohistory

Residual subsidence curve

Page 40: Day2_Geohistory
Page 41: Day2_Geohistory
Page 42: Day2_Geohistory

Decompaction exercise (approximation

method)