data & evaluation reports dispositions (2006) · juvenile justice information system data &...

Juvenile Justice Information

System

Data & Evaluation Reports

Dispositions (2006)

JJIS Steering Committee

JJIS Data & Evaluation Sub-Committee

JJIS – A Shared Information System

Oregon Youth Authority Oregon Juvenile Department Directors’ Association

Juvenile Justice Information System Vision & Goals

VISION

To promote public safety and youth accountability, and to offer opportunities for rehabilitation to youth, through the development of a statewide juvenile justice information system that:

Provides a comprehensive view of information about juvenile offenders across Oregon’s state and county juvenile justice agencies;

Provides comprehensive support for managing individual juvenile offender cases and tracking juveniles through the juvenile justice process;

Provides the capacity for and aids in the overall planning, development, and evaluation of programs designed to reduce juvenile crime; and

Recognizes and supports the common needs of juvenile justice partnership agencies.

GOALS To accomplish the vision, JJIS will strive to accomplish the following goals.

Vision Statement Goals in Support of Vision Statement Provides a comprehensive view of information about juvenile offenders across Oregon’s state and county juvenile justice agencies.

JJIS will: • Be a statewide juvenile justice information system that supports a

partnership of the OYA, 36 county juvenile departments, and approved external partners;

• Be the primary information system used by the OYA and county juvenile departments to manage and report information about juvenile offenders in their agency; and

• Support statewide reporting.

Provides comprehensive support for managing individual juvenile offender cases and tracking juveniles through the justice process.

JJIS will: • Support the assessment of risks and needs of juvenile offenders; • Support individual case plans; and • Track juveniles through the entire justice process so that individual

status, program involvement, progress, and outcomes can be determined.

Provides the capacity for and aids in the overall planning, development, and evaluation of programs designed to reduce juvenile crime.

JJIS will provide data and information to: • Develop a knowledge base about outcomes relevant to functions and

programs of the juvenile justice system; • Evaluate the benefit of programs aimed at reducing juvenile crime.

Recognizes and supports the common needs of juvenile justice partnership agencies.

JJIS will: • Be developed in a cost-efficient and incremental manner; • Be operated in an efficient manner; • Eliminate duplicate data entry within the JJIS partnership agencies; • Develop common data elements while maintaining integrity of

information and adhering to existing state justice information system standards;

• Provide a statewide standard for entry of information into the system;

• Ensure consistent training of JJIS users; • Maintain confidentiality and protection of information contained in

JJIS; • Be designed using the cooperative input of the JJIS partnership; and • Be guided by the decisions and policies of the JJIS Steering

Committee.

JJIS Steering Committee

The JJIS Steering Committee provides oversight to the JJIS project. It meets monthly to review the project and ensure that it is on task to accomplish the vision and goals of JJIS. The Steering Committee prioritizes the development of software features, makes policy decisions, and allocates resources to the project. George Dunford, Assistant Director

Oregon Youth Authority Business Services

Dave Koch, Assistant Director Multnomah County Juvenile Community Justice Department

Charles Logan-Belford, Director Umatilla County Juvenile Department

Tim Loewen, Director Yamhill County Juvenile Department

Trish Reding, Director Polk County Juvenile Department

Lisa Smith, Director Lane County Juvenile Department

Jill Petersen, Manager Oregon Youth Authority Information Systems

Ed Schmidt, Manager JJIS Implementation & Training

Cherie Lingelbach, Coordinator JJIS Policy & Standards

Jann Brown Multnomah County Juvenile Justice Department

Brian Florip, Assistant Director Oregon Youth Authority Facility Operations

Debbie Rios, Assistant Director Oregon Youth Authority Program Office

Robyn Cole, Assistant Director Oregon Youth Authority Field Operation

JJIS Data & Evaluation Subcommittee -- serving as a standing subcommittee of the JJIS Steering Committee to:

• guide the development of routine publications/statistics; specific research initiatives; design, reporting, and analysis of JJIS data in order to provide quality program and system evaluations and forecasting for system resources and prevention and intervention strategies; and

• function as an analytical Users Group that assesses development, implementation, and interpretation of reports for consistency, accuracy, and appropriateness in the areas of program evaluation, forecasting, policy analysis, impact analysis, and trend analysis.

Joe Christy Data & Evaluation Subcommittee Chair

and Washington County Juvenile Department Director

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR PURPOSES OF 2-SIDED PRINTING

Introduction This document contains three sets of statewide and county specific reports describing dispositions. The first two reports describe dispositions assigned during the reporting year and the characteristics of the juveniles receiving the dispositions. The third describes categories of offenses that were assigned dispositions during the reporting year, descriptions of the dispositions that were assigned for each offense category, and the characteristics of the juveniles that committed these offenses. Sub-totals and grand-totals are provided for each category. Each statistic is broken down by the youth’s sex, age at the time of disposition, and race. The three sets of reports are:

Disposition of Youth by Demographics

The number of youth that received a disposition by the juvenile justice system during the reporting year.

Youth on the Disposition of Youth report are reported in most intense disposition category imposed for that youth during the year. The youth is counted only once on the Disposition of Youth report, regardless of the number of dispositions a youth is assigned during the year. If there was more than one disposition with the same intensity, the disposition with the most recent date was selected.

Disposition of Referrals by Demographics

The number of referrals that received a disposition by the juvenile justice system during the reporting year.

Referrals on the Disposition of Referrals report are reported in the most intense disposition category imposed for that referral during the year. If there was more than one disposition on the same referral with the same intensity, the disposition with the most recent date was selected.

Disposition of Referrals by Offense Category

The number of referrals that received a disposition by the juvenile justice system during the reporting year by offense category. The report includes felony, misdemeanor, non-criminal violation and dependency status offense referrals that received dispositions in the year.

The offense category is the most serious offense associated with the most intense disposition on the referral, categorized according to Oregon Revised Statute (ORS), Criminal Code of Oregon, as defined by the Oregon Legislature. Severity is determined by each offense’s category, type, and class. (See Appendix A.)

Dispositions are reported in the most intense disposition on the referral. (See Appendix B.) If there was more than one disposition on the same referral with the same intensity, the disposition with the most recent date was selected.

This report also provides demographics of the youth who received dispositions including gender, age at disposition, and race/ethnicity.

March 2007

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR PURPOSES OF 2-SIDED PRINTING

Mal

es

Fem

ales

Un

kn

ow

n

12

an

d Y

ou

ng

er

13

- 1

5

16

an

d O

lder

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an

Asi

an

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

Wh

ite

His

pan

ic

Oth

er/U

nk

no

wn

Disposition Group Total Sex Age @ Disposition Race/Ethnicity%

% o

f T

ota

l

Hood River

Dismissed, Not Petitioned or Not Adjudicated

1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 Dismissed or No Jurisdiction

1 5 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 Referred to Another Agency

9 5 0 0 6 8 0 0 3 0 0 11 14 Review and Close

0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Warning

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Intake Office Contact and Close

3 4 0 1 3 3 0 0 3 0 1 3 7 Rejected by District Attorney

2 6 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 1 3 8 Plea Bargain or Alternative Process

Total 17 23 0 2 14 24 0 0 12 0 4 24 40

60.0 10.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0% 60.0 35.0 5.0% 0.0 57.5 42.5%% 21.1%

Authorized Diversion or Other Informal Disposition

2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 Diversion Supervision

15 28 1 4 20 20 0 0 14 0 3 27 44 Diversion - Youth Court

3 6 0 0 1 8 0 1 1 0 0 7 9 Informal Sanction(s)/Supervision

9 39 0 2 18 28 0 0 25 0 2 21 48 Formal Accountability Agreement

Total 29 74 1 6 40 58 0 1 40 0 5 58 104

55.8 4.8 0.0 38.5 1.0 0.0% 55.8 38.5 5.8% 1.0 71.2 27.9%% 54.7%

Adjudicated Delinquent

6 26 0 1 12 19 0 0 13 1 0 18 32 Probation

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Commit/Custody to Other Agency (Non-OYA)

1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Probation & OYA Commitment for Community Placement

0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 OYA Commitment for YCF

Total 8 29 0 1 16 20 0 0 14 1 0 22 37

59.5 0.0 2.7 37.8 0.0 0.0% 54.1 43.2 2.7% 0.0 78.4 21.6%% 19.5%

Adult Court

2 7 0 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 0 3 9 Adult Court

Total 2 7 0 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 0 3 9

33.3 0.0 0.0 44.4 11.1 11.1% 88.9 11.1 0.0% 0.0 77.8 22.2%% 4.7%

56 133 1 9 71 110 1 2 70 1 9 107 Total of Youth Dispositions for Hood River 190

% 29.5% 70.0 0.5 4.7% 37.4 57.9 0.5% 1.1 36.8 0.5 4.7 56.3 0.7%

2006Dispositions of Youth by Demographics

Hood River - Report #00205sa

Mal

es

Fem

ales

Un

kn

ow

n

12

an

d Y

ou

ng

er

13

- 1

5

16

an

d O

lder

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an

Asi

an

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

Wh

ite

His

pan

ic

Oth

er/U

nk

no

wn

Disposition Group Total Sex Age @ Disposition Race/Ethnicity%

% o

f T

ota

l

Hood River


2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 Dismissed or No Jurisdiction

1 7 0 1 1 6 0 0 1 0 1 6 8 Referred to Another Agency

13 14 0 0 10 17 0 0 9 0 0 18 27 Review and Close

0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Warning

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Intake Office Contact and Close

3 5 0 1 3 4 0 0 4 0 1 3 8 Rejected by District Attorney

2 21 0 0 7 16 0 0 10 0 1 12 23 Plea Bargain or Alternative Process

72 Total 22 50 0 2 23 47 0 0 26 0 4 42

58.3 5.6 0.0 36.1 0.0 0.0% 65.3 31.9 2.8% 0.0 69.4 30.6%% 28.1%

Authorized Diversion or Other Informal Disposition

2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Diversion Supervision

17 32 1 4 25 21 0 0 16 0 3 31 50 Diversion - Youth Court

3 8 0 0 2 9 0 2 2 0 0 7 11 Informal Sanction(s)/Supervision

12 46 0 2 22 34 0 0 28 0 2 28 58 Formal Accountability Agreement

123 Total 34 88 1 6 51 66 0 2 46 0 5 70

56.9 4.1 0.0 37.4 1.6 0.0% 53.7 41.5 4.9% 0.8 71.5 27.6%% 48.0%


0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Formal Sanction

6 34 0 1 15 24 0 1 16 2 0 21 40 Probation

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Commit/Custody to Other Agency (Non-OYA)

1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 Probation & OYA Commitment for Community Placement

0 5 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 5 OYA Commitment for YCF

52 Total 8 44 0 1 24 27 0 1 20 2 0 29

55.8 0.0 3.8 38.5 1.9 0.0% 51.9 46.2 1.9% 0.0 84.6 15.4%% 20.3%

Adult Court

2 7 0 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 0 3 9 Adult Court

9 Total 2 7 0 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 0 3

33.3 0.0 0.0 44.4 11.1 11.1% 88.9 11.1 0.0% 0.0 77.8 22.2%% 3.5%

Total of Referral Dispositions for Hood River 256 66 189 1 9 99 148 1 4 96 2 9 144

% 25.8% 73.8 0.4 3.5% 38.7 57.8 0.4% 1.6 37.5 0.8 3.5 56.3 0.6%

2006Dispositions of Referrals by Demographics

Hood River - Report #00207sa

Rej

ecte

d b

y D

A

Inta

ke O

ffic

e C

onta

ct &

clo

se

Ple

a B

arga

in o

r A

lter

nat

ive

Pro

cess

Div

ersi

on

Div

ersi

on -

You

th C

our

t

Info

rmal

San

ctio

n(s)

/Sup

erv

isio

n

Com

mit

/Oth

er A

genc

y(n

on-O

YA

)

For

mal

San

ctio

n

FA

A

Pro

b. O

YA

Com

mit

/Pla

cem

ent

Pro

bati

on

Pro

b. C

omm

it O

th.

Ag

ency

(N

on

-OY

A)

Offense Group

Div

ert

& C

lose

Ref

erre

d to

Ano

ther

Age

ncy

Rev

iew

& C

lose

War

ning

OY

A Y

CF

Com

mit

Adu

lt C

ourt

Total Dismissed, Not Petitioned or Not Adjudicated

Authorized Diversion or

Other Informal

Dispositions Adjudicated DelinquentAdult

Court

Dis

mis

sed

or

No

Juri

sdic

tion

Whi

te

Oth

er/U

nkno

wn

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an

His

pani

c

Asi

an

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

16 a

nd O

lder

13 -

15

12 a

nd Y

oun

ger

Unk

now

n

Mal

es

Fem

ales

Sex

Age @

Disposition Race/Ethnicity

Hood RiverCriminal

Person

Assault 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 7 0 13 0 0 1 2 3 35 2 8 27 0 2 11 22 0 0 20 0 2 13

Sex Offense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 1 5 0 0 5 1 1 0 2 0 0 3

Total 41 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 7 0 15 0 0 1 5 4 2 9 32 0 2 16 23 1 0 22 0 2 16

0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 17.1 0.0 36.6 0.0 0.0 2.4 12.2 9.8 % 4.9 22.0% 78.0 0.0 4.9 39.0 56.1 2.4 0.0 53.7 0.0 4.9 39.0

Property

Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Burglary 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 1

Criminal Mischief 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 15 0 2 13 0 1 8 6 0 0 2 1 0 12

Criminal Trespass 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 1 5 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 5

Theft 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 11 0 13 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 6 31 0 3 19 15 0 0 24 1 1 11

Total 63 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 1 16 0 17 0 16 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 54 0 4 30 29 0 0 31 2 1 29

1.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 1.6 25.4 0.0 27.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 14.3% 85.7 0.0 6.3 47.6 46.0 0.0 0.0 49.2 3.2 1.6 46.0

Public Order

Disorderly Conduct 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 6 0 2 5 1 0 0 5 0 1 2

Harassment 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 2 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 0 3

Weapons 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1

Total 16 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 12 0 2 10 4 0 0 9 0 1 6

0.0 6.3 6.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 25.0% 75.0 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 0.0 0.0 56.3 0.0 6.3 37.5

Substance/Alcohol

Substance/Alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 10 0 0 7 5 0 1 4 0 0 7

Total 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 7 5 0 1 4 0 0 7

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 8.3 0.0 25.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 16.7% 83.3 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 0.0 8.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 58.3

Criminal Other

Criminal Other 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 2 6 0 0 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 6

Total 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 6 0 0 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 6

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 % 0.0 25.0% 75.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 75.0

140 4 1 1 0 0 8 9 3 27 0 30 1 37 0 0 5 5 7 Total Criminal 2 26 114 0 8 64 68 1 1 68 2 4 64

2.9 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 5.7 6.4 2.1 19.3 0.0 21.4 0.7 26.4 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.6 5.0 % 0.3% 1.4 18.6% 81.4 0 5.7 45.7 48.6 0.7 0.7 48.6 1.4 2.9 45.7

2006Disposition of Referralsby Offense Category

Hood River - Report #00209sa 1

Rej

ecte

d b

y D

A

Inta

ke O

ffic

e C

onta

ct &

clo

se

Ple

a B

arga

in o

r A

lter

nat

ive

Pro

cess

Div

ersi

on

Div

ersi

on -

You

th C

our

t

Info

rmal

San

ctio

n(s)

/Sup

erv

isio

n

Com

mit

/Oth

er A

genc

y(n

on-O

YA

)

For

mal

San

ctio

n

FA

A

Pro

b. O

YA

Com

mit

/Pla

cem

ent

Pro

bati

on

Pro

b. C

omm

it O

th.

Ag

ency

(N

on

-OY

A)

Offense Group

Div

ert

& C

lose

Ref

erre

d to

Ano

ther

Age

ncy

Rev

iew

& C

lose

War

ning

OY

A Y

CF

Com

mit

Adu

lt C

ourt



Other Informal


Court

Dis

mis

sed

or

No

Juri

sdic

tion

Whi

te

Oth

er/U

nkno

wn

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an

His

pani

c

Asi

an

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

16 a

nd O

lder

13 -

15

12 a

nd Y

oun

ger

Unk

now

n

Mal

es

Fem

ales

Sex

Age @


Non-Criminal

Alcohol/MIP

Alcohol/MIP 2 2 0 0 1 0 6 1 14 2 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 19 31 1 0 11 40 0 0 16 0 3 32

Total 51 2 2 0 0 1 0 6 1 14 2 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 31 1 0 11 40 0 0 16 0 3 32

3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 11.8 2.0 27.5 3.9 41.2 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 37.3% 60.8 2.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0 5.9 62.7

Curfew

Curfew 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 4 7 0 0 4 7 0 0 3 0 0 8

Total 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 4 7 0 0 3 0 0 8

18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.5 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 36.4% 63.6 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 72.7

Less Than Ounce

Less Than Ounce 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 5 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 6

Total 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 6

14.3 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 57.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 28.6% 71.4 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 85.7

Motor Vehicle

Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 2

Total 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 2

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 % 0.0 0 % 100.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 50.0

Tobacco

Tobacco 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 11 0 0 3 9 0 2 0 0 0 10

Total 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 3 9 0 2 0 0 0 10

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.7 41.7 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 8.3% 91.7 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3

85 3 5 0 0 1 0 8 1 23 11 28 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 Total Non-Criminal 0 26 58 1 1 20 64 0 3 21 0 3 58

3.5 0.0 5.9 0.0 1.2 0.0 9.4 1.2 27.1 12.9 32.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 % 0.2% 0.0 30.6% 68.2 1.2 1.2 23.5 75.3 0 3.5 24.7 0 3.5 68.2

Dependency Status Offense

Dependency Status Offense

Runaway 0 18 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 9 13 0 0 9 13 0 0 6 0 0 16

Dependency Status Offense Other 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 4 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 1 0 2 5

Total 30 1 21 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 17 0 0 14 16 0 0 7 0 2 21

70.0 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 3.3 43.3% 56.7 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 0.0 0.0 23.3 0.0 6.7 70.0

30 1 21 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Dependency Status

Offense 1 13 17 0 0 14 16 0 0 7 0 2 21



Rej

ecte

d b

y D

A

Inta

ke O

ffic

e C

onta

ct &

clo

se

Ple

a B

arga

in o

r A

lter

nat

ive

Pro

cess

Div

ersi

on

Div

ersi

on -

You

th C

our

t

Info

rmal

San

ctio

n(s)

/Sup

erv

isio

n

Com

mit

/Oth

er A

genc

y(n

on-O

YA

)

For

mal

San

ctio

n

FA

A

Pro

b. O

YA

Com

mit

/Pla

cem

ent

Pro

bati

on

Pro

b. C

omm

it O

th.

Ag

ency

(N

on

-OY

A)

Offense Group

Div

ert

& C

lose

Ref

erre

d to

Ano

ther

Age

ncy

Rev

iew

& C

lose

War

ning

OY

A Y

CF

Com

mit

Adu

lt C

ourt



Other Informal


Court

Dis

mis

sed

or

No

Juri

sdic

tion

Whi

te

Oth

er/U

nkno

wn

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an

His

pani

c

Asi

an

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

16 a

nd O

lder

13 -

15

12 a

nd Y

oun

ger

Unk

now

n

Mal

es

Fem

ales

Sex

Age @


3.3 3.3 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.1% 3.3 43.3% 56.7 0 0 46.7 53.3 0 0 23.3 0 6.7 70.0

Dependency Other

Dependency Other

Dependency Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 100.0% 0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total Dependency Other 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0 100.0% 0 0 0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0

Total Referral Disposition for

Hood River

256 66 189 1 9 99 148 1 4 96 2 9 144 3 8 27 2 0 1 8 23 4 50 11 58 1 40 1 0 5 5 9

% 25.8% 73.8 0.4 3.5 38.7 57.8 0.4 1.6 37.5 0.8 3.5 56.3 1.2 3.1 10.5 0.8 0 0.4 3.1 9.0 1.6 19.5 4.3 22.7 0.4 15.6 0.4 0 2.0 2.0 3.5

Unduplicated Count of Youth 193



Appendix A — JJIS Severity Scores (adopted, Oregon Juvenile Department Directors’ Association, May 18, 2000)

Crime Category Class & Type Severity Score

Person Murder* 19 Person A Felony 18 Person B Felony 17 Person C Felony 16 Person U Felony 15 Property Other Criminal (Behavioral) A Felony 14

Property Other Criminal (Behavioral) B Felony 13

Property Other Criminal (Behavioral) C Felony 12

Property Other Criminal (Behavioral) U Felony 11

Person A Misdemeanor 10 Person B Misdemeanor 9 Person C Misdemeanor 8 Person U Misdemeanor 7 Property Other Criminal (currently named Behavioral) A Misdemeanor 6

Property Other Criminal (currently named Behavioral) B Misdemeanor 5

Property Other Criminal (currently named Behavioral) C Misdemeanor 4

Property Other Criminal (currently named Behavioral) U Misdemeanor 3

Non Criminal Violation 2 Status Offense 1

* Aggravated Murder, Murder, Murder by Abuse, Murder in the Course of a Crime, Murder

Intentional, Criminal Homicide, and Treason have the Type of Murder (instead of Felony), in order to obtain the highest severity score.

** Inchoates: Attempts and Solicitations = 1 Class lower Conspiracies = Same Class and Type

Appendix B — Notes About the Information Rounding: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Statewide Youth and Referral Counts: The statewide youth and referral counts may be less than the sum of the county counts because some youth may have received a disposition in more than one county during the year. On the county level reports, the youth and referral is counted on each appropriate county’s report. However, at the statewide level the youth and referral is counted only once.

County: The county reported is the county responsible for assigning the youth’s disposition. If the county was recorded on the disposition it was selected as the responsible county. If there was no county identified on the disposition, the original referral county was reported as the disposition county.

Race and Ethnicity: The JJIS Steering Committee defined Age and Race/Ethnicity reporting categories based on best practices and available data. Race and Ethnicity may be as recorded by the juvenile department based on police reports and youths’ self-reporting. These reports categorize youth by the race that is recorded in JJIS unless the recorded ethnicity is Hispanic. When the recorded Ethnicity is Hispanic, the youth is categorized as Hispanic, regardless of recorded Race. There are several efforts underway in the state to standardize reporting of race and ethnicity. The categories of Race/Ethnicity used in this report may change in the future when state standards are defined.

Disposition Categories: These reports categorize dispositions according to a standard developed by the JJIS Data and Evaluation Committee, and modeled after national reporting standards. Detailed dispositions have been grouped into the disposition reporting categories.

For all reports, dispositions are grouped into categories consistent with national reporting categories as follows. Categories are listed from least to most intense level of juvenile justice intervention.

Dismissed or No Jurisdiction

Referred to Another Agency

Review & Close

Warning

Divert & Close

Intake Office Contact & Close

Rejected by DA


Plea Bargain or Alternative Process

Diversion Supervision

Diversion – Youth Court

Informal Sanction(s)/ Supervision

Authorized Diversion Programs or Other Informal Disposition

Formal Accountability Agreement

Formal Sanction

Probation

Commit/Custody to Other Agency (Non-Youth Authority)

Probation and Commit/Custody to Other Agency (Non-Youth Authority)

Probation and Youth Authority Commitment for Community Placement


Youth Authority Commitment for Youth Correctional Facility Placement

Adult Court Adult Court

Dispositions Included on the Report: • Dispositions that were assigned in the year. (Note: The referrals on which these dispositions have

been imposed may have been received prior to the reporting year.) • Dispositions for referrals that contain allegations of criminal offenses; violations; and dependency

status offenses of runaway, beyond parental control, and behavior to endanger self or others. Dispositions for referrals for all other dependency matters and local ordinances are excluded from these reports, except as noted below.

• Disposition and Offense Categories: Dispositions are reported in the most intense disposition on the referral. The offense category is the most serious offense associated with the most intense disposition on the referral. Referral offenses may change between referral and disposition. If a referral contained a qualifying allegation that was dismissed and a local ordinance that was assigned a more intense disposition, the report will display local ordinance as the most serious offense. However, as noted above, if a referral contained only a local ordinance, it is excluded from this report. Example 1 - Referral with One Offense

Referral Allegation Most Serious Referral Allegation Disposition Most Intense

Disposition Most Serious

Disposed Allegation

Burglary 1 - (Property) Burglary 1 - (Property) Probation Probation Burglary 1 - (Property)

Example 2 - Referral with Two Offenses

Referral Allegations Most Serious Referral Allegation Disposition Most Intense


Disposed Allegation

Burglary 1 - (Property) Probation Probation Burglary 1 - (Property)

Assault 1 – (Person) Assault 1 – (Person) Dismissed

Example 3 - Referral with Two Offenses and a Local Ordinance Violation

Referral Allegations Most Serious Referral Allegation Disposition Most Intense


Disposed Allegation

Assault 4 - (Person) Assault 4 - (Person) Dismissed

Runaway – (Dependency Status ) Referred to

Another Agency

Nuisance Violation (Local Ordinance)



Nuisance Violation (Local Ordinance)

Cautions: Disposition data is challenging to present for the following reasons. • A youth may receive more than one disposition for the same referral. Different allegations on the

same referral occasionally receive different dispositions. • A referral may be disposed of with a less intense disposition because another related referral is

disposed of with a more intense disposition. • A disposition may change over time. A disposition may be replaced with a more intense

disposition following non-compliance with the initial disposition (i.e. probation violation). • A youth may receive more intensive dispositions if he/she is a repeat offender.

These reports examine the interrelationship between different referrals, types of offenses and judicial and juvenile department dispositions. Future reports will examine the difference between how offenses are categorized at the point of referral and how offenses are categorized at the point of disposition.

data & evaluation reports dispositions (2006) · juvenile justice information system data &...

Documents