data channel motive and pursuance for the lte narrowband iot · activity/qos prerequisites and...

Data Channel Motive and Pursuance ForThe LTE Narrowband IOT

GADDE BHARGAVI1

Dr N.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY2

July 6, 2018

Abstract

In 3GPP Rel-13, a narrowband framework in light ofLong Term Evolution (LTE) is being acquainted with givewide-region cell network to the Internet of Things. Thisframework, named Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT), can be conveyed in three diverse activity modes (1) re-main solitary as a committed transporter, 2) in-band insidethe possessed transfer speed of a wideband LTE bearer, and(3) inside the monitor band of a current LTE bearer. Theoutline focuses of NB-IoT incorporate ease gadgets, highscope (20-dB changeover GPRS), long gadget battery life(over 10 years), and monstrous limit. Dormancy is casualdespite the fact that a postpone spending plan of 10 sec-onds is the objective for exemption reports. This currentprocedure examines the outline and execution of the down-link and uplink information channels. the proposed anotherchannel determination conspire when various channels areaccessible at the same time. Other than conventional choicefactors, the new channel determination calculation considersthe channel’s future accessibility acquired from range expec-tation. By appropriately incorporating the range forecast,client portability expectation, and channel choice, the newrange administration system is equipped for allotting therange asset even more productively. Broad reenactmentsare led and results confirm that the proposed range admin-istration technique fundamentally enhances the framework

1

International Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsVolume 120 No. 6 2018, 7149-7168ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/Special Issue http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/

7149

execution as far as decreasing handoff times and enhancingclient palatable, association unwavering quality, and chan-nel usage.

Key Words:NB-IOT, LTE, coverage ,handoff

1 INTRODUCTION

Cognitive Radio (CR), which gives the capacity to tackle the capa-bility of unused/underutilized (range openings) in an entrepreneurialway, is a key empowering innovation for dynamic range get to. Arepresentation of the cognitive radio innovation is exhibited in Fig.1.1

(a) Illustration of the static spectrum assignment policy

(b) Illustration of the cognitive radio technology Fig.1.representation of the cognitive radio innovation is exhibited

1. Student of VR Siddhartha Engineering,ECE dept, [email protected]. Assoct prof of VR Siddhartha Engineering,india,[email protected]

A cognitive radio system commonly includes two kinds of clientsare essential clients who are officeholder authorized clients of therange and CR clients (otherwise called optional clients), who at-tempt to deftly get to the unused authorized range as long as thehurtful obstruction to essential clients is restricted. To viably actu-alize the idea of cognitive radio systems administration, CR frame-works require the capacity to play out the accompanying capacities:

2

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

7150

range detecting, range choice, range sharing, and range portability.In range detecting, CR clients sense the PU range inhabitance sta-tus and perceive the range openings in the authorized groups thatcan be utilized for their own particular interchanges. In this ar-ticle, we introduce an outline on the most imperative expectationstrategies in cognitive radio networks. A cognitive radio networks(CRN) ordinarily comprises of two sorts of clients: Primary clients(PUs) and secondary clients (SUs). Discharge is authorized clientsand they are approved to utilize the assigned channels at whateverpoint as required. Interestingly, SUs are unlicensed clients and theyare just permitted to get to channels shrewdly without meddlingPUs ease of use.

In this paper, we propose a novel and thorough range adminis-tration procedure, named expectation based range administrationas physical base station model (PBSM). PBSM is made out of threeprocedures: range forecast, client versatility expectation, and chan-nel determination. Range forecast alludes to the way toward inves-tigating and anticipating channel practices. With respect to therange forecast in PBSM, we enhance the high-arrange shrouded bi-variate Markov demonstrate (H2BMM) by considering the brokendetecting practices of versatile SUs. Other than the high-arrangeand the bivariate highlights in the shrouded Markov demonstrate,this progressed H2BMM likewise considers the versatility of SUsand accomplishes better forecast exactness in a portable CRN.

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

In [8], a review of LTE determinations are given and its executionis confirmed by recreation comes about. An extensive portrayal ofthe connection layer conventions and the communication betweenconvention layers is talked about in [9]. Physical layer attributesand highlights are researched in [10] and the outcomes demonstratehow extraordinary highlights for example, versatile tweak, plan-ning, and multi receiving wire transmission plans affect the ghostlyproficiency. Be that as it may, the throughput investigation is con-strained to SISO situations. Another the vital though is the execu-

3


7151

tion examination of WiMAX and LTE in view of various situations.In [11], the displayed comes about represent that LTE is superiorto WiMAX regarding range productivity, normal client throughput,what’s more, cell edge bit rate picks up for both TDD and FDDtasks. This examination likewise demonstrates the outcomes for 10MHz framework transfer speed.

In [12] the execution evaluation is constrained to downlink andFDD task just and the outcomes display better radio execution forLTE on account of the lower overhead. In expansion to executioncorrelations, comparable to particulars what’s more, innovationsare examined in various productions. For occasion, the work in [13]orders MIMO arrangements in LTE and WiMAX, while [14] por-trays hand-off innovations for both correspondence benchmarks. Bethat as it may, the extensive varieties in the announced executioncomes about provoked us to take a more inside and out investi-gation of the LTE particulars and build up a complete and pointby point assessment of the LTE execution. The increasing inter-est for transmitting data over a remote channel has prompted thedevelopment of Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) innova-tion. The utilization of different radio wires at the two finishes ofa remote connection empowers the opening of various spatial infor-mation pipes between the transmitter and the collector inside therecurrence band of task for no extra power consumption. MIMO in-novation has appeared its guarantee of giving high data rates with-out extra ghostly necessities, which has been very much clarified inthe spearheading works of Foschini and Gans [13] and Telatar [14].There is an impressively substantial measure of writing on Rayleighfading which considers just Non-Line-Of-Sight (NLOS) parts. Bethat as it may, in actuality, there are Line-Of-Sight (LOS) parts be-tween the transmitter and recipient which are best portrayed by theRician fading appropriation. In [15], the creator examines the limitfurthest reaches of MIMO correspondence framework following Ri-cian conveyance. In [16], the creators a touched base at a correctarticulation of normal Mutual Information (MI) rate of MIMO Ri-cian fading channels when the fading coefficients are autonomous,in any case, not indistinguishably disseminated. Research work in[17] has set up that the nearness of solid LOS parts associated withthe channel sparsity, along these lines diminishing the number of

4


7152

Degrees of Freedom (DoF). The nearness of NLOS parts diminishesthe connection between’s the signs consequently expanding the rankof the channel grid. Limit of spatially associated MIMO diverts hasbeen getting in [18]. Both double-sided and double-sided relation-ship has been considered in [18]. In [19], the creator investigationsergodic limit with regards to MIMO channels with rank-1 meanframeworks. Upper and lower limits on the ergodic limit have beenexhibited in [19]. Upper bound on the ergodic limit with regardsto a framework experiencing Rician fading for self-assertive Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and rank of a framework is inferred in [20].

3 PROPOSED SYSTEM

a ) Channel Structure of LTETo proficiently bolster different QoS classes of services, LTE re-

ceives a various leveled channel structure. There are three distinc-tive divert writes characterized in LTEintelligent channels, trans-port channels, and physical channels, each related to a service accesto point (SAP) between various layers. These channels are utilizedby the lower layers of the convention stack to give services to thehigher layers. The radio interface convention engineering and theSAPs between various layers. Coherent channels give services atthe SAP amongst MAC and RLC layers, while transport channelsgive services at the SAP amongst MAC and PHY layers. Physicalchannels are the genuine usage of transport channels over the radiointerface.

Fig.1.2. Structure of LTE

5


7153

This enhances the proficiency of the radio interface and can bolsterdynamic asset distribution between various UEs relying upon theiractivity/QoS prerequisites and their particular channel conditions.In this segment, we depict in detail the different sensible, transport,and physical diverts that are characterized in LTE.

B) Transport ChannelsThe vehicle channels are utilized by the PHY to offer services to theMAC. A vehicle channel is essentially described by how and withwhat attributes information is exchanged over the radio interface,that is, the channel coding plan, the tweaked plan, and receptionapparatus mapping. Contrasted with UTRA/HSPA, the quantityof transport diverts in LTE is diminished since no devoted channelsare available.

LTE characterizes two MAC substances: one in the UE and onein the E-UTRAN, which handle the accompanying downlink/uplinktransport channels.There Are Two Types Of Physical Channels which are discussedDownlink physical channelUplink physical channel

C) Spectrum prediction based Cognitive Radio ChannelCognitive radio is a technology that enables secondary users to dis-cover and access the spectrum holes in the licensed bands. The CRtechnology includes four major functions, which are presented inFig 1.3

Fig.1.3. The CR technology

6


7154

The task of the CR capacities appeared in Fig. 3.2 can bedepicted as takes after. A CR client successively faculties the rangegroups and develops a range pool comprising of all the found rangegaps in the range detecting stage, and chooses a channel from thepool for its own transmissions in the range choice stage.By makingutilization of these four capacities, CR clients can craftily use theunused authorized range for their own particular interchanges.

Generally utilized Markov show as the First-arrange Markovdisplay, N-arrange Markov demonstrate, Hidden Markov Model(HMM), Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP)and Variable Length Markov Model (VMM) these five classes. Theupsides of the principal arrange Markov display are that it is straight-forward in structure and includes few estimation parameters, yet itsweakness is that it can just utilize the present channel state data toanticipate whenever, which brings about constrained forecast im-pact. the POMDP expectation show which can make utilization ofhalfway data for forecast ought to be conceived. In POMDP hasbeen utilized to anticipate the channel state, which is viable to en-hance the unearthly effectiveness and select the best channel get to.It is demonstrated that the POMDP can play out the expectation ofthe range under flawed condition. the geometric circulation normalfor HMM discovers that it couldnt precisely depict the stay time ofchannel state. Second, in HMM, one state is exclusively dictatedby its prompt past state, which may not be exact in a genuine sit-uation. To enhance the execution of HMM, a few calculations, forexample, high-arrange HMM and shrouded bivariate Markov show(HBMM) are presented. In our earlier work, the proposed H2BMMuse the upsides of both high-arrange and bivariate highlights andaccomplishes unrivaled execution in this class. Accordingly, in thispaper, we pick H2BMM as a model and propose the progressedH2BMM, which coordinates the portability highlights of SUs.

4 SIMULATION RESULTS

In this segment, we do broad reenactments to assess the proposedrange administration plot as far as the precision of range forecasts,the effectiveness of the range use, and forecast costs. In the reenact-

7


7155

ment, we think about the entire range of 500 Mb/s, which is equallypartitioned into five sub channels for information correspondence.Note that the regular control channel that is utilized for the co-ordination amongst CBS and SUs is isolated from the informationchannel. In the system, we have three authorized PUs, the areaand channel control of which are represented in Fig. . Every PUhas 10% opportunity to use the directions in the unit of opening.Keeping in mind the end goal to assess the execution of PBSM innetworks of contrast estimate, we differ the quantity of SUs from 2to 10. The SUs haphazardly move in a 400 by 400 m territory. TheCBS situates in the focal point of the system and can cover all SUsin the entire district. We set the range detecting interim of SUs asthree spaces and the handoff delay as one opening.

Fig.1.4. Performance Comparison on Spectrum Prediction

In this area, we initially assess the precision of the progressedH2BMM and H2BMM on range expectation and demonstrate theoutcomes in Fig.1.4. Forecast exactness is characterized by the pro-portion of right range expectation. PBSM embraces the incorpo-rated range detecting, where the CBS gathers the detecting comesabout because of various SUs. Conversely, in the H2BMM, eachSU distinguishes the PU independently and performs range expec-tation depending on neighborhood detecting result. At the pointwhen a versatile SU moves into the secured zone of a PU, both theprogressed H2BMMand H2BMMcan refresh their preparation gridin view of the new detecting outcome with the goal that the expec-tation model can adjust to the new range condition convenient.

8


7156

Fig.1.5. Prediction accuracy of H2BMM and advanced H2BMM

Nonetheless, as shown in Fig.1.5 their expectation exactnesses havenoteworthy contrasts. The progressed H2BMM in PBSM accom-plishes higher expectation precision than the H2BMM profitingfrom the concentrated range detecting on the CBS. The expandednumber of SUs sending the detecting information to the CBS expe-dites better preparing the grid of H2BMM and enhances the forecastprecision, as shown in Fig. . By differentiating, for H2BMM, theexpanded number of SUs has no evidential effect on the forecastexactness since each SU conducts the range detecting and expecta-tion autonomously. The forecast precision of H2BMM, along theselines, is much lower than that of the progressed H2BMM in PBSMin a portable CRN condition.

M-AHP and GRA-Based Channel SelectionThis segment surveys the execution of the proposed range choicestrategy, i.e., the mixture of M-AHP and GRA calculation, as faras handoff times and transmission capacity usage. The ping-stringimpact is a marvel of successive range handoffs happened in theconvergence of two cells. The pointless handoffs debase the rangeusage as well as influence the solidness of correspondence connectsin a CRN. In this manner, in this reproduction, we just take theSUs inside the crossing point zone of PUs to assess the effect ofping-string impact on the channel determination. In Section V-A,we have presented the M-AHP judgment framework. The estima-tion of every segment in the judgment grid of M-AHP, JMMAHP,is relegated as takes after as per our subjective inclination:

M-AHP and GRA (f 1-f 6); M-AHP and GRA (f 2-f 6); andrandom selection.

9


7157

Fig.1.6. Handoff time of different channels selection algorithmschanges along with PU transients state probability

f1 f2 f3f4 f5 f6

Every component of this lattice speaks to the relative significanceof factors. For instance, the second component in the principalcolumn of the judgment framework, i.e., whole number 3, showsthat factor f1 is marginally more vital than factor f2. At thatpoint, the eigenvector as per the most extreme eigenvalue of judg-ment framework is(0.8861,0.3195,0.1829,0.1109,0.1829,0.1829) Thiseigenvector is standardized to

ω′ = (0.4750, 0.1713, 0.0981, 0.0595, 0.0981, 0.0981)′

The qualities in the weight vector speak to the weights of compo-nents, that is, the heaviness of f1 to f6 is 47.50%, 17.13%, 9.81%,5.95%, and 9.81%, individually. We sort the components in thesliding request of the weight esteems and get f1, f2, f3, f5, f6, f4.We look at the M-AHP and GRA-based channel determination cal-culation with and without factor f1. The handoff delay with shiftingtransient state likelihood of PU is delineated in Fig.1.6 the half-breed weighted calculation proposed in this paper can essentially

10


7158

lessen the handoff delay since the channel accessibility shows a moredrawn out living arrangement time at each channel. Be that as itmay, the handoff times begin to decrease when PU transient statelikelihood keeps on expanding. This is because when the earthturns out to be less steady for SUs to locate a steady channel, ahandoff ought not be led.

Fig.1.7. Users satisfaction of different channel selection algorithmschanges along with the number of SUs.

Second, we assess the clients’ fulfillment which is controlled bythe impact factors f1 ∼ f6. We utilize ui(0 ≤ ui ≤ 1) to demon-strate the utility estimation of factor fi, where ”0” and ”1” showthat the most exceedingly awful and the best estimation of the fac-tor, individually. The general utility esteem u(0 ≤ u ≤ 1) is thenormal of ui(1 ≤ I ≤ 6). The examination of clients’ fulfillmentappears in Fig. 1.7. Clients’ fulfillment mirrors the correspondencequality including the connection security. A high utility esteemdemonstrates a high fulfillment. For a conventional determinationcalculation, QoSs (f2∼f6) are the principle impact factors, however,the reaction is visited handoffs. In the wake of including the directaccessibility f1 in this paper, we can decrease the handoff delay andconsequently enhance client’s fulfillment. As appeared in aboveFig. , with the thought of factor f1, surprising change of clients’fulfillment is accomplished, particularly with an extensive numberof SUs, Performance Comparison on Mobility Prediction In thissegment, we assess the execution of the portability forecast calcula-tion in PBSM. The versatility forecast plans utilized for correlationare recorded as takes after

1) UMP (User portability forecast just plan): In this plan, thereis no range expectation process and the CBS just predicts client ver-

11


7159

satility. On the off chance that an SU is anticipated to approach aPU, it will stay away from to get to channels having a place withthis PU and scan for other accessible directs ahead of time.2) SP (Spectrum expectation just plan): In this plan, no clientversatility forecast process is included and the CBS is in chargeof anticipating range status. The SU chooses whether or not tochange to other accessible channel construct just upon the directstatus anticipated ahead of time.3) UMP and SP: Joint client versatility and range expectation con-spire, which is the proposed plot utilized as a part of PBSM. TheCBS predicts both client portability and range accessibility, fromwhich the CBS prescribes accessible channels to SUs.4) No expectation: In this plan, SUs have no learning of futureclient portability or range status.

The SU leave the ebb and flow channel instantly and scan forother accessible channels when it detects the presence of PU in thepresent channel.

Fig.1.8. Probability of no connection for different spectrummanagement schemes changes along with the SU number.

The likelihood of losing association (PLC) is characterized to demon-strate the proportion of no association time to entire recreationtime. PLC is an essential pointer to assess correspondence qualityand channel use. Low PLC implies a steady correspondence con-nect and a low level of correspondence debasement. Despite whatmight be expected, high PLC implies a poor QoS and low channel

12


7160

use.

Aftereffects of PLC for four distinct plans are delineated in Fig1.8 By and large, UMP has a lower PLC than SP because UMPconducts handoff before entering PUs’ obstruction district. Rangeforecast requires effective processing and capacity abilities, howeverin the SP just plan, the SU needs to rely upon itself to acquire thelearning about future range status, which implies that the SP justplan isn’t material to a client versatile condition. Be that as it may,when the quantity of SUs is under three, SP has brought down PLCthan UMP in light of the fact that the CBS can’t accumulate ade-quate preparing information from SUs to show and anticipate theclient versatility. The joint UMP and SP plot takes the benefit ofboth UMP and SP and the CBS gets adequate data to direct rangeand client versatility expectation. Subsequently, it is sensible forthe joint UMP and SP to plan to come to the most reduced PLC.For both the joint UMP and SP and UMP just plans, a bigger num-ber of SUs bring a lower PLC because more SUs are useful for theCBS to get enough preparing information to acquire high expecta-tion exactness. Another vital marker of CRNs is the data transfercapacity use, which is assessed too. Five directs are expected inthe range pool and each channel has 100 Mb/s transmission ca-pacity. The channel use at PU side is around 10%; the recurrenceband possessed by each SU is 10 MHz. In this way, the systempermits up to 45 SUs to convey at the same time. The correlationof channel use among various methodologies has appeared in Fig.1.8

13


7161

Fig.1.9. Bandwidth utilization of different spectrum managementscheme changes along with the number of SUs.

In the reenactment, we accept the normal transmission capacity us-age of PUs is around 10%. In a perfect world, the SUs accomplishthe most astounding channel use if SUs perform culminate rangedetecting and use the channel at whatever point it is sitting out ofgear. Hence, the most extreme hypothetical data transmission us-age of SUs is around 90%. As should be obvious from Fig.1.9 , ourproposed range administration plan can accomplish around 82%transmission capacity use. For other three plans, SP just, UMPjust, and no expectation, the most extreme use is around half. Weincrement the system size to 50 to examine the pattern of datatransmission used with a differing number of SUs. At the pointwhen the quantity of SUs is under 20, four plans show a compa-rable execution since range asset is sufficient to oblige all SUs andrange rivalry is generally mellow. At the point when the quantityof SUs keeps on expanding, range rivalry ends up serious and SUsinvest more energy in range looking. Nonetheless, with the PBSMconspire, each SU can locate its best channel with slightest clasheswith different SUs.

Evaluation on Prediction Cost

14


7162

Forecast cost shows the cost to CRN framework came about be-cause of the blunders in range and versatility expectation. We haveexamined the impact of expectation inability to the cost esteem hy-pothetically. In this area, the expected cost under various forecastprecision conditions are assessed and comes about are appeared inFig.1.9 . From Fig.1.10 , we watch a positive connection between’sthe expected cost and forecast mistake. The expansion of rangeexpectation mistake or versatility forecast mistake both bring anascent of the cost. So as to better watch the pattern of the ex-pected cost, we settle the range exactness and plot the impact ofportability forecast, as appeared in Fig1.10. (a). Essentially, weadditionally settle the versatility exactness and explore the impactof range forecast.

Fig.1.10. Prediction cost versus spectrum prediction accuracywith fixed mobility prediction accuracy.

In every subfigure of above Fig. , four lines exhibit four distinctlevels of range or client versatility forecast precision. No1.10te thatforecast exactness is relatively difficult to approach 100% and theline with 100% precision is drawn under an uncommon condition.The other three lines are produced from various expectation tech-niques. Contrasting these four lines, we reach an inference that alow expectation cost is acquired when the forecast precision is high.In this we have demonstrated that a high range forecast precisionis accomplished given a low transient state likelihood. Also, a highclient versatility forecast exactness is accomplished with less sur-prising movements of SUs. Subsequently, under typical situationswhere transient state likelihood is low and startling movements ofSUs are less, our forecast technique will carry an elite change with

15


7163

a generally ease. From the above examination, we can likewiseinduce that the precision of range expectation heavier affects thecost than that of versatility forecast. The purpose for is that thedisappointment of range expectation is more inclined to cause alost association contrasted and a wrong portability forecast. Forinstance, if the SU is moving far from any PU now, regardless ofwhether the SU neglects to anticipate its versatility, range fore-cast is as yet substantial. At the point when the quantity of SUincrements adequately, range expectation precision and versatilityforecast exactness are relied upon to affect similarly on the cost.

5 CONCLUSION

This paper gives an outline of the NB-IoT framework and talksabout the itemized plan of the downlink and uplink information di-rects to LTE Rel-13. Adding to it we have proposed a novel PBSMplot, which coordinated H2BMM-based range expectation, high-order Markov show based client portability forecast, and the half-breed of M-AHP and GRA-based weighted channel choice. Thiscombination expedites an exactness expectation channel status witha moderately low computational many-sided quality. In view offorecast comes about, the CBS is equipped for recommending su-perb directs to SUs in an auspicious way. Reproduction comesabout have confirmed critical execution changes of PBSM on rangeuse by decreasing handoff times and alleviating the likelihood oflosing association. As future work, we intend to assess the pro-posed PBSM conspire in a genuine range condition as opposed toa reenactment situation. In addition, we will center around vital-ity sparing and secure correspondence to additionally enhance theexecution of the range administration conspire.

References

[1] A. De Domenico, E. C. Strinati, and M.-G. Di Benedetto, Asurvey on MAC strategies for cognitive radio networks, IEEE

16


7164

Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2144, Jan.Mar.2012.

[2] E. Z. Tragos, S. Zeadally, A. G. Fragkiadakis, and V. A. Siris,Spectrum assignment in cognitive radio networks: A compre-hensive survey, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 3,pp. 11081135, Jul.Sep. 2013.

[3] D. N. Nguyen and M. Krunz, Spectrum management andpower allocation in MIMO cognitive networks, in Proc. IEEEConf. Comput. Commun., 2012, pp. 20232031.

[4] Y. Luo, L. Pu, M. Zuba, Z. Peng, and J.-H. Cui, Challengesand opportunities of underwater cognitive acoustic networks,IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 198211,Jun. 2014.

[5] Y. Zhao, M. Song, C. Xin, and M. Wadhwa, Spectrum sensingbased on three-state model to accomplish all-level fairness forco-existing multiple cognitive radio networks, in Proc. IEEEConf. Comput. Commun., 2012, pp. 17821790.

[6] M. T. Masonta, M. Mzyece, and N. Ntlatlapa, Spectrum de-cision in cognitive radio networks: A survey, IEEE Commun.Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 10881107, Jul.Aug. 2013.

[7] Y. Luo, L. Pu, Z. Peng, and J.-H. Cui, Dynamic control chan-nel mac for underwater cognitive acoustic networks, in Proc.IEEE 35th Annu. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Commun., 2016,pp. 19.

[8] D.W. K. Ng, M. Shaqfeh, R. Schober, and H. Alnuweiri, Ro-bust layered transmission in secure miso multiuser unicast cog-nitive radio systems, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no.10, pp. 82678282, Oct. 2016.

[9] D. W. K. Ng, E. S. Lo, and R. Schober, Multiobjective re-source allocation for secure communication in cognitive radionetworks with wireless information and power transfer, IEEETrans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 31663184, May 2016.

17


7165

[10] I. Akbar and W. H. Tranter, Dynamic spectrum allocationin cognitive radio using hidden Markov models: Poisson dis-tributed case, in Proc. IEEE SoutheastCon Conf., 2007, pp.196201.

[11] Y. Song and J. Xie, Prospect: A proactive spectrum handoffframework for cognitive radio ad hoc networks without com-mon control channel IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 11, no.7, pp. 11271139, Jul. 2012.

[12] W.-Y. Lee and I. F. Akyildiz, Spectrum-aware mobility man-agement in cognitive radio cellular networks, IEEE Trans. Mo-bile Comput., vol. 11,no.4, pp. 529542, Apr. 2012.

[13] Z. Chen, Channel state prediction in cognitive radio, in Cog-nitive Radio and Interference Management: Technology andStrategy. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2012, p. 273.

[14] X. Xing, T. Jing, W. Cheng, Y. Huo, and X. Cheng, Spectrumprediction in cognitive radio networks, IEEE Trans. WirelessCommun., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 9096, Apr. 2013.

[15] Z. Damljanovic, Mobility management strategies in heteroge-neous cognitive radio networks, J. Netw. Syst. Manage., vol.18, no. 1,pp. 422, 2010.

[16] L.Wang and G.-S. G. Kuo, Mathematical modeling for networkselection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A tutorial, IEEECommun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 271292, Jan.Mar.2013.

[17] I. Butun, A. C. Talay, D. T. Altilar, M. Khalid, and R. Sankar,Impact of mobility prediction on the performance of cognitiveradio networks, in Proc. Wireless Telecommun. Symp., 2010,pp. 15.

[18] R. Aguilar-Gonzalez, M. Cardenas-Juarez, U. Pineda-Rico, A.Arce, M. Latva-aho, and E. Stevens-Navarro, Reducing spec-trum handoffs and energy switching consumption of madm-based decisions in cognitive radio networks, Mobile Inf. Syst.,vol. 2016, 2016, Art. no. 6157904.

18


7166

[19] Y. Saleem and M. H. Rehmani, Primary radio user activitymodels for cognitive radio networks: A survey, J. Netw. Com-put. Appl., vol. 43, pp. 116, 2014.

[20] L. R. Welch, Hidden Markov models and the BaumWelch al-gorithm, IEEE Inf. Theory Soc. Newslett., vol. 53, no. 4, pp.1013, Dec. 2003.

[21] Z. Chen and R. C. Qiu, Prediction of channel state for cognitiveradio using higher-order hidden Markov model, in Proc. IEEESoutheastCon Conf., 2010, pp. 276282.

[22] T. Nguyen, B. L. Mark, and Y. Ephraim, Spectrum sensingusing a hidden bivariate Markov model, IEEE Trans. WirelessCommun., vol. 12, no. 9,pp. 45824591, Sep. 2013.

[23] Y. Zhao, Z. Hong, G. Wang, and J. Huang, High-order hid-den bivariate Markov model: A novel approach on spectrumprediction, in Proc. 25th IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Commun.Netw., Aug. 2016, pp. 17.

[24] Z. Lin, X. Jiang, L. Huang, and Y. Yao, A energy predictionbased spectrum sensing approach for cognitive radio networks,in Proc. Int. Conf. Wireless Commun., Netw. Mobile Comput.,2009, pp. 14.

[25] V. K. Tumuluru, P. Wang, and D. Niyato, A neural networkbased spectrumprediction scheme for cognitive radio, in Proc.Int. Conf. Commun.,2010, pp. 15.

[26] A. Hadachi, O. Batrashev, A. Lind, G. Singer, and E.Vainikko,Cell phone subscribers mobility prediction using enhancedMarkov chain algorithm, in Proc. IEEE Intell. Vehicles Symp.,2014, pp. 10491054.

[27] E. Ahmed, L. J. Yao, M. Shiraz, A. Gani, and S. Ali, Fuzzy-based spectrum handoff and channel selection for cognitiveradio networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput., Control,Informat. Appl., 2013, pp. 2328.

19


7167

data channel motive and pursuance for the lte narrowband iot · activity/qos prerequisites and...

Documents