data analysis state accountability. data analysis (what) needs assessment (why ) improvement plan...

Data Analysis State

Accountability

Data Analysis(What)

Needs Assessment

(Why)

Improvement Plan

(How)

Implement and Monitor

Details

Index Framework Statutory Goal

Improving Student achievement at all levels in the core subjects of the state curriculum

1


Ensuring the progress of all students toward achieving Advanced Academic Performance

2


Closing Advanced Academic Performance level gaps among groups

3

Index Framework Statutory Goals

Closing gaps among groups in percentage of students graduating under the recommended high school program and advanced high school program

4

Index 1: Student Achievement

Index 2: Student Progress

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

System Safeguards

Why a Performance Index ?

With a performance Index, the resulting rating reflects overall performance for the campus or district rather than the weakest performance of one student group/subject area.

Multiple indexes can be used in the framework to ensure accountability for every student.

Any number of indicators and student groups can be added to the system without creating additional targets for campuses and districts to meet.

Met Standard

Met Alternative StandardImprovement Required

Index Standards

Index Score

50

AEA-25

5th Percentile

Index Score

55

AEA-30

Index Score

75

AEA-45

Differences

English Language Learners

Student Groups…Economically Disadvantaged

African AmericanAmerican IndianAsianHispanicPacific IslanderWhiteTwo or more races

Special Education

Minimum Group Size

25

Common

Elements

If student was enrolled on the campus/district on this date:

Then these results are included in the campus/district accountability subset

Fall 2011 enrollment snapshot

EOC summer 2012

Fall 2012 enrollment snapshot

EOC Fall 2012

EOC Spring 2013

Grade 3-8 Spring 2013

Different

“Let Go”Keep

Different

“Let Go”Keep

Minimum Group Size 25 30/10/50 or

50/10/200

What does this report tell you about a

campus?

New Reports• Calculation Report-Tables used to

aggregate scores to determine Index Points

• Data Table- Table of disaggregated data used for the Calculation Report. The highlighted cells indicate data used in calculations.

Index 1: Student

Achievement

No Minimum Size3 year average if less than

10 students

Which student groups are calculated in Index 1?

Index 1 :Student Achievement

Subjects: Combined over Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Tests: STAAR English, STAAR Spanish, EOC, STAAR and EOC Modified and Alternate, TAKS Grade 11

Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II

(2013)

MSR: None

# Met Phase in Level II for Reading

# Met Phase in Level II for Writing

# Met Phase in Level II for Math

# Met Phase in Level II for Science# Met Phase in Level II for Social Studies

# Tested Reading

# Tested Writing

# Tested Math

# Tested Science

# Tested Social Studies

What does the calculation report indicate about a

campus?What would an Index score

of 45 indicate about the campus?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the campus based on the calculation report?

What reflective questions would you ask the campus about this data?

What are your unanswered questions about this campus based on the calculation report?

Index 2: Student Progress

We do not know? Scores for :Did not Meet Expectations Met ExpectationsExceeded Expectations

The Index scores that identifies the lowest 5%

What we do know?

Subjects Reading

Math

Writing

Applies to available grades

Student Groups

Two or More Races

Pacific IslanderHispanic

Asian

American Indian

African American

Special Education

ELL

White

All Students

Minimum Size CriteriaAll Students = 10 testsRace/ Ethnicity groups = 25

Methodology

Met- one point for each percent of students at the Met growth expectation levelExceeded- two points for each percent of students at the Exceeded growth expectations level

Set a side for a minute

Methodology

Met- one point for each percent of student at the Met growth expectation levelExceeded- two points for each percent of students at the Exceeded growth expectations level

How is the data in Index 2 different from Index 1?

How does improved performance on Index 2 impact the other

Indexes?

What advice would you give this campus to impact Index 2? (using

the sample reports)

Index 3: Closing

Performance Gaps

What you need to know to calculate Index 3?

Subjects…

• STAAR English 3-8 and STAAR Spanish 3-5 at phase-in Level II

• EOC at phase-in Level II for spring, and the previous fall and summer

• STAAR 3-8 and EOC Modified and Alternative at Level II

• Retest results 5 and 8 from 1st retest• TAKS Grade 11 in 2013

Results include…

2 lowest performing race/ethnicity groups from the previous year

Student Groups…Economically Disadvantaged

African AmericanAmerican IndianAsianHispanicPacific IslanderWhiteTwo or more races

Accountability Subset…

Minimum Group Size… >=25 for Race/Ethnicity groups

Methodology…

Phase-in Level II- 2013 and beyond- one point for each percent of students at the phase-in Level II performance standard and above

Advanced Level III-2014 and beyond- one additional point for each percent of students at the Level III performance standard

Calculations

Number of Tests

Number at Phase in Level II

Number of Tests

Number at Level III

2014

Economically Disadvantaged group always

evaluated

Set a Side

How will each subject tested affect the

overall Index 3 score?

What recommendations would you make to this campus based

on the sample reports?

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

Indicators

STAAR Percent Met Final Level II on One or More Tests

Grade 9-12 Graduation Rate

Grade 9-12 Annual Dropout Rate

Recommended/ Distinguished Achievement (Advanced) High School Program (RHSP/DAP)

2013-2014

STAAR Percent Met Final Level II on One or More TestsIncludes Assessment results

for:STAAR English (Grade 3-8 and Spanish (Grade 3-5) at final Level II performance standard for assessments administered in the springEOC at final Level II performance standard for assessments administered in the spring and the previous fall and summerSTAAR Grades 3-8 and EOC Modified and Alternative at final Level II performanceRetest results

2013-2014

Number of Students Met final II Standard on One or More Tests

Number of Students with One or More Tests

2013-2014

Class of

2011 and beyond Student Groups:

All Students ELL-Identified in Grade 9 Special Education 7 Race/ Ethnicity Groups

25

Graduation Rate

Graduates

Graduates + continuers +

GED recipients + dropouts

2013 and beyond

Student Groups: All Students ELL-Identified in during reported year Special Education 7 Race/ Ethnicity Groups

Annual Drop Out Rate

Campuses with Grade 9, 10, 11, & 12

25

Number of students who dropped out during

year

Number of students enrolled during year

Student Groups: All Students 7 Race/ Ethnicity Groups

Recommended/ Distinguished Achievement High School Program

25

Number of prior year graduates with graduation

codes for RHSP or DAP

Number of prior year graduates

Index Standards

Index Score

50

AEA-25

5th Percentile

Index Score

55

AEA-30

Index Score

75

AEA-45

Why is some of the data marked out?

Why is only graduation rate and RHSP/DAP

calculated in the sample report for Index 4 points?

System Safeguards

Purpose• Ensure system disaggregates

performance by student group, performance level, subject area, and grade

• Target for disaggregated results meet and exceed federal requirements– Performance Target– Participation Rate – Graduation rate targets and improvement– Limit on Alternative Assessments

Impact• Results are reported for any cell that

meets minimum size criteria.• Failure to meet the safeguard target

for any reported cell must be addressed

• Performance on the safeguard indicators are incorporated into the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)

How does the system safeguards ensure high

expectations for all students?

Using these sample reports, how would you advise a

campus that met all Index standards but only 85% of the system safeguards?

Who are our AEA campuses?

Current 10 eligibility Criteria Primarily Grades 6-12

AEA Eligibility

Residential Facilities

No rating for 2013

What’s different for AEA?

GED


GED 4, 5 and 6 Year Graduation rates

Choose the best

4, 5 and 6 Year Graduation rates


Dropout Rate

Less then 20%

Bonus points given for Index 4

75 %Graduation

and GED Score


25 %% met Level II

on one or more tests

Alternate Education Accountability

Index Score

50

AEA-25

5th Percentile

Index Score

55

AEA-30

Index Score

75

AEA-45

AEA

BON

US

POIN

TSRHSD and DAP Plans

Continuing Student who Graduate in 5th or 6th year

Graduating/GED for “statutorily excluded students”

What is the 4 year graduation rate?

What happens if you do not meet graduation for a student group?

What effect does drop out rate have

on index score?

Why will elementary and middle schools not be scored on Index 4 this year?

What information can the AEA Index Scores and the System

Safeguards data tell you about alternative campuses?

data analysis state accountability. data analysis (what) needs assessment (why ) improvement plan...

Documents