Dante’s Inferno

Marcus Berg,1 Enrico Pajer,2 and Stefan Sjors1,2

1Oskar Klein Center for Cosmoparticle Physics and Department of Physics,Stockholm University, Albanova University Center, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

2Institute for High Energy Phenomenology, Newman Laboratory ofElementary Particle Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

We present a simple two-field model of inflation and show how to embed it in string theory asa straightforward generalization of axion monodromy models. Phenomenologically, the predictionsare equivalent to those of chaotic inflation, and in particular include observably large tensor modes.The whole high-scale large-field inflationary dynamics takes place within a region of field spacethat is parametrically subplanckian in diameter, hence improving our ability to control quantumcorrections and achieve slow-roll inflation.

In the observationally successful framework of infla-tionary cosmology, we can study detectable consequencesof physics at very high energies. The energy scale atwhich inflation took place is a free parameter that is stillvery poorly constrained, and can range from the GUTscale to the TeV scale (or even less). The high-scale endof this interval is the most exciting: first, it is the closestto the Planck scale1 MP , where quantum gravity shouldbecome important; second, the scale of inflation is de-termined by the amplitude of primordial tensor modes,which will be detectable in the CMB only if this scale isclose to the GUT scale.

An interesting perspective on high-scale inflation isgiven by the Lyth bound [1]. This says that detectably-large tensor modes, which are equivalent to high scale in-flation2, require superplanckian variation of the inflatonfield. This increases the UV-sensitivity of inflation, e.g. inthe sense that an infinite sequence of Planck-suppressedhigher dimension operators become crucial for assessingthe success of the model. This suggests that high-scalelarge-field models provide a framework particularly wellsuited to test candidate UV completions of quantum fieldtheory plus general relativity, such as string theory.

In this work we study a model of inflation, whichwe call Dante’s Inferno, where high-scale large-field in-flationary dynamics takes place within a region of fieldspace which is parametrically subplanckian in diameter.This provides a new perspective on the Lyth bound andits implications. We organize our presentation as follows.First, we describe the effective field theory implementa-tion of this model, which contains a mechanism to allevi-ate any η-problem that might be present. Then we showhow Dante’s Inferno can be embedded in string theory,as a straightforward generalization of axion monodromymodels. The multi-field dynamics alleviates two of theleading backreaction constraints present in the single-field case.

1 We use the reduced Planck mass defined by M2P ≡ (8πGN )−1.

2 We assume perturbations are generated by the inflaton.

Figure 1: The potential in (2) (for W (r) = 12m2r2) in Carte-

sian coordinates, which faithfully represent the metric on fieldspace.

THE EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY MODEL

Our effective model consists of two axions r and θwhose decay constants fr and fθ obey fr < fθ. A linearcombination of r and θ receives a periodic potential fromsome non-perturbative effect, which breaks their contin-uous shift symmetry down to a discrete one. In addition,we explicitly break the shift symmetry for r by introduc-ing a term W (r) in the potential, where W (r) is an a pri-ori arbitrary regular function. The resulting Lagrangianfor canonically normalized fields is

L =12

(∂r)2 +12

(∂θ)2 − V (r, θ) , (1)

V (r, θ) = W (r) + Λ4

[1− cos

(r

fr− θ

fθ

)], (2)

where Λ is a non-perturbatively generated scale and rand θ have dimensions of mass. Notice that in the cosinewe have chosen a particularly simple linear combination.At the level of the effective action this can be done with-out loss of generality, since other values of the coefficientscould be reabsorbed in the definition of fr and fθ. Onthe other hand, in the string theory construction, fr and

arX

iv:0

912.

1341

v1 [

hep-

th]

7 D

ec 2

009

2

fθ are determined by the geometry of the compactifica-tion. We will come back to this point in the next section.We define W (r) such that the vacuum energy densityvanishes at the minimum.

We have performed our computations with W (r) anarbitrary monomial in r and we will give explicit for-mulae for this at the end of this section. In the axionmonodromy string models (about which more in the nextsection), so far only the linear case W (r) = µ3r has beenstudied, where µ is a constant. For the purpose of ex-position, in the following we will discuss details for thequadratic case W (r) = 1

2m2r2 instead, for two reasons.

First, it captures a few minor additional complicationswhich are absent in the linear case only. Second, it is thearchetypal potential with an η problem.

We will soon find out that the whole observable infla-tionary dynamics involves a range dr that can be madeparametrically small. If dr were arbitrarily small, wecould always expand any W (r) around a minimum, henceobtaining a quadratic potential. In concrete realizations,e.g. the string theory model presented in the next sec-tion, the various parameters are constrained and it isa model-dependent question whether the quadratic ap-proximation is accurate. In any event, the validity of ourmechanism does not rely on W (r) being quadratic.

We would also like to stress that the field space metricis simply dr2 + dθ2, as can be seen from (1), and not theinduced flat space metric in polar coordinates.

We plot the potential as in figure 1. It is clear that thedistance traversed along each “trench” is (almost) thesame at different heights. However, the periodicity in θis not manifest. We therefore also show figure 2, which isthe justification for the title of this work: the potential(2) in polar coordinates looks like a spiral staircase, wherethe periodicity θ → θ + 2πfθ is manifest. However, infigure 2, the induced field space metric is not faithfullyrepresented, unlike in fig. 1 (it is dr2 + dθ2, as statedabove). Indeed, in fig. 2, one can be misled to believethat the spiral trenches at the bottom are much smallerper revolution than those further up, but as we saw in fig.1 they are actually almost the same length at differentheights.

The inflationary dynamics can be intuitively read offfrom either figure. The system starts somewhere up inthe W (r) potential, quickly rolls in the r direction to theclosest trench3 and from there it slowly spirals along thetrench mostly in the θ direction. This classical two-fieldslow-roll motion can be captured by an effective single-field potential that we are now going to derive.

3 The initial condition problem here is no worse than in standardchaotic inflation. If the inflaton has some downward initial speed,then it needs to start at some larger r to achieve enough e-foldsof inflation.

Figure 2: The potential in (2) for W (r) = 12m2r2 in cylindri-

cal coordinates, which do not faithfully reproduce the field-space metric as given in (1), contrary to Cartesian coordinatesin figure 1. On the other hand, in polar coordinates, the pe-riodicity in θ is apparent and the similarity with Inferno asdescribed by Dante [2] becomes evident.

First it is convenient to rotate our coordinates by(θr

)=(

cos ξ sin ξ− sin ξ cos ξ

)(θr

), (3)

with

sin ξ =fr√

f2r + f2

θ

, cos ξ =fθ√

f2r + f2

θ

, (4)

after which the potential becomes

V =12m2(r cos ξ + θ sin ξ

)2

+ Λ4

[1− cos

r

f

], (5)

where f = frfθ/(f2r + f2

θ )1/2. As initial condition, weassume the system starts high up in the quadratic poten-tial, but still at subplanckian values, i.e. f � rin < MP .An interesting regime to consider is then

A. fr � fθ �MP ,

B. Λ4 � fm2rin.

It will turn out that useful values of Λ range from10−3MP to 10−1MP . Typical values for fr and fθ tokeep in mind are 10−3MP and 10−1MP , respectively.The advantage of considering subplanckian fr and fθ isthat we will eventually embed this model in controlledstring models, where superplanckian axion decay con-stants seem elusive [3]. We will assume for the rest ofthis section that these two conditions hold. Notice thatcondition A implies

cos ξ ' 1 , sin ξ ' frfθ, f ' fr , (6)

3

to leading order in fr/fθ.When the system rolls along the bottom of a trench,

the excitations in the r directions are very massive,i.e. ∂2

rV > H, and r can be integrated out. This adia-batic approximation boils down to assuming that, as thesystem evolves mostly along the trench in the θ direc-tion, the new θ-dependent minimum in the r direction isreached very quickly. So we need to solve ∂rV = 0, i.e.

Λ4

fsin

r

f+m2 cos ξ

(r cos ξ + θ sin ξ

)= 0 , (7)

or equivalently

sinr

f= −m

2 cos ξfrΛ4

. (8)

Conditions A and B then imply sin(r/f)� 1 at the ini-tial and all subsequent times. Modulo a shift in θ, whichis a symmetry of the Lagrangian and in tilded coordinatescorresponds to r → r−2πfθ sin ξ and θ → θ+ 2πfθ cos ξ,one finds r � f . Intuitively, this means that r stays atthe bottom of the trench throughout the infernal dynam-ics (see figure 3). Hence we linearize (7) and find

r ' −θ m2 cos ξ sin ξf2

m2 cos2 ξf2 + Λ4' −θ fr

fθ

m2f2r

Λ4, (9)

where again we made use of conditions A and B. Usingthe adiabatic approximation, we can describe the dynam-ics in the two-field potential (2) using a single-field po-tential. Renaming θ = φeff , the solution (9) reduces (5)to

Veff(φeff) =12m2

eff φ2eff , meff ≡ m

frfθ

(10)

and the kinetic term is still canonical at leading order infr/fθ.

To summarize, we have shown that the Dante’s Infernotwo-field potential leads to dynamics effectively equiva-lent to that of the archetypal model of single-field chaoticinflation, V = 1

2m2φ2, for which the scalar-to-tensor ra-

tio is 0.14 and the spectral tilt is ns ' 0.96. However,there are two remarkable differences in the parameters.

First, the effective mass meff is suppressed by the smallfactor fr/fθ with respect to m. This parametrically im-proves the ability to avoid a potential η problem. Asa figure of merit, if m ∼ H as is typical in supergrav-ity and superstring models, then a modest hierarchyfr/fθ ∼ O(10−1) is sufficient to ensure the validity ofthe slow-roll conditions.

Second, the interpretation of the Lyth bound is notthe same in the original variables r, θ as in φeff . We willdevote the next subsection to this point.

Kim, Nilles and Peloso [5] proposed an interesting two-field model (based on [6]) that also has the two propertiesof the previous paragraphs. A drawback of their model

Figure 3: The field-space contour plot of the potential.Brighter red shading corresponds to higher energy and viceversa. Both rotated and un-rotated coordinates are showntogether with φeff which is always tangent to the inflation-ary trajectory. Upon the use of the θ shift-symmetry, thewhole inflationary trajectory can be contained into a regionof subplanckian diameter, indicated by the dotted box.

is that it relies on a precise cancellation between two pa-rameters (their g1 and g2). As a figure of merit, startingwith axion decay constants of order g1, g2 ∼ 10−1MP ,fine tuning on the order of 1% to 0.1% is needed for theirmodel to work. In Dante’s Inferno, no fine tuning is re-quired to make the potential suitable for 60 e-folds ofslow-roll inflation. In fact, fr and fθ can be changed byorder-one factors without affecting the main result. Per-haps more importantly, our setup is derived from a con-crete string theory construction (in the case W (r) = µ3r)that we will describe in the next section.

Finally, we report similar results for a generic mono-mial W (r) = λpr

p/p! . In the regime analogous to thatgiven by the conditions A and B above, one finds thatthe effective single-field potential is

Veff =λeffp

p!φpeff , λeff

p =(frfθ

)pλp . (11)

From the string-theory perspective that we will soonadopt, an interesting special case of (11) is p = 1,i.e. W (r) = λ1r, where λ1 is a constant of dimension(mass)3, called µ3 in the string models. In this case rcan be integrated out exactly, without the need to ex-pand (7). In fact, r is exactly constant throughout theslow-roll inflationary dynamics. For generic p, (11) showsthat even if one starts with a coupling λp dictated by nat-uralness, plus the assumption of a MP (or lower) cutoff,a hierarchical choice of fr and fθ can still ensure slow-roll inflation. Intuitively, the inflationary direction φeff

is a mixture of the potentially steep r direction and thenearly-flat θ direction, with a small mixing angle givenby sin ξ ∼ fr/fθ.

4

Field range and Lyth bound

The Lyth bound [1] says that observably large ten-sor modes, equivalent to high-scale inflation, require thatthe length of the inflationary trajectory is superplanck-ian. The length is measured by ∆φeff =

∫dφeff , where

φeff is defined as the canonically normalized field alwaystangent to the inflationary trajectory. In fact, this canbe verified in our model, where we found a tensor-to-scalar ratio of 0.14 and ∆φeff ∼ 15MP . The relevance ofthe Lyth bound lies in its implications for the robustnessof the potential against possible corrections. In orderto discuss this, let us introduce some more precise lan-guage. We call fundamental fields those that naturallyappear in the Lagrangian as derived from a fundamentalUV theory, such as string theory, which have a precisemeaning in this UV theory. As we will see, both {r, θ}and {r, θ} are fundamental fields. Symmetries, like theθ shift symmetry in our case, are most explicit in termsof these fields. We call effective fields the result of thoseconvenient field redefinitions that are useful to describeparticular phenomena. They may not have a precise in-terpretation in the UV theory and may obscure its un-derlying symmetries. For example, φeff is convenient todescribe the inflationary dynamics, but any notion of ashift symmetry θ → θ+constant is lost in this formula-tion, as in (11).

The Lyth bound is usually supplemented by some prej-udices about possible corrections. Without further spec-ification, one generically expects that a large field rangeopens up the possibility for large corrections, which inturns makes it harder to ensure flatness of the potential,for example. It is appropriate to discuss corrections interms of fundamental fields, because they have a clearinterpretation in the UV theory from which these correc-tions can come. Also, in terms of these fields, symmetriescan be most effectively used to understand and controlsuch corrections, as usual in effective field theory. InDante’s Inferno, for example, the periodicity in θ can beused to argue that no polynomial corrections can spoilthe flatness in that direction. On the other hand, theLyth bound is a statement about the range of effectivefields. This dichotomy is latent in single-field models butbecomes particularly sharp in multi-field models such asDante’s Inferno. A superplanckian inflationary trajec-tory can fit into a region of subplanckian diameter asshown in figure 3. This would be impossible in a singlefield model4. Let us make this quantitative. In the rdirection the entire inflationary dynamics is contained in

4 Of course invoking a non-canonically normalized single field doesnot help because the diameter of a region in field space has tobe measured in terms of the field-space metric.

a region of diameter:

dr =fr√

f2r + f2

θ

∆φeff 'frfθ

∆φeff

[1−O

(f2r

f2θ

)]. (12)

Thus, provided on can achieve a large enough hierarchyfr/fθ, then dr < MP � ∆φeff . The θ direction enjoysa shift symmetry, hence the largest diameter possible isthe period itself, i.e. dθ = 2πfθ. To summarize, dr �MP and dθ � MP (from condition A). Hence we haveshown that the entire high-scale chaotic-like inflationarydynamics can be contained in a region of subplanckiandiameter. The discussions in this section applies mutatismutandis to any p.

THE STRING THEORY MODEL

In this section we show how to embed Dante’s Infernoin string theory. The construction is a simple general-ization of the axion monodromy models constructed in[7, 8, 9]. We discuss only those ingredients that are newand special to the two-field model (2) and refer the readerto [8, 9] for further details on the explicit construction.The bottom line is that Dante’s Inferno relaxes someconstraints and dangerous backreaction effects presentin single-field axion monodromy models. Roughly speak-ing, the importance of backreaction and other correctionsturns out to be proportional to the range of variation ofthe axions involved in the model. Explicit examples arethe backreaction of four-cycle volumes and light Kaluza-Klein masses discussed in [9]. In Dante’s Inferno, as op-posed to the single-field case, the ranges of variation drand dθ of the axions, i.e. the fundamental fields in (2), aresmall in Planck units. This holds even though the lengthof the inflationary trajecotry, as measured by the effec-tive field φeff in (11), is superplanckian (inflation takesplace at the GUT scale).

Ingredients

The first step is to ensure that the two axionic fieldsin (2) are present in the low energy effective action ofstring theory. Following [8, 9], we consider Type IIBCalabi-Yau orientifold compactifications. The integralof ten-dimensional two-form fields over two-cycles leadsto four-dimensional axions which are in one-to-one corre-spondence with the homology classesH−(1,1) of orientifold-odd two-cycles. Hence we require dimH−(1,1) > 2. Theseaxions enjoy a shift symmetry to all orders in perturba-tion theory that is broken only by either non-perturbativeeffects or by the presence of branes.

We consider a situation in which Euclidean D1-brane(ED1) instantons are present with the right number offermionic zero-modes (four) in order to correct the Kahler

5

Figure 4: A cartoon of the ingredients required to embedDante’s Inferno in string theory.

potential5. Without loss of generality, we choose a basisH−(1,1) such that the two-cycle ΣED1 that supports theinstanton is a linear combination of two basis elements Σrand Σθ that correspond to the four-dimensional axions rand θ respectively. This arrangement produces a cosineterm as in (2) but with a possibly different argument:

cos(αr

fr− β θ

fθ

)(13)

for some real numbers α and β, that are in principledetermined by a calibration condition on ΣED1. NowΛ4 ∝ e−SED1 where SED1 is the instanton action, whichis proportional to the volume of ΣED1. Higher instantoncontributions are suppressed by further powers of e−SED1 .

The crucial assumption is that one can introduce amonodromy for one of the two axions, say r, in a control-lable manner. A first attempt would be to assume that rcomes from the NSNS B-field and θ comes from the RRtwo-form field. In this case the shift symmetry of the B-type axion would be broken by the non-perturbative cor-rections to the superpotential required in a moduli stabi-lization a la KKLT [11], while the C-type axion would beunaffected. A non-perturbative effect generated by (p, q)-string instantons could depend on a linear combinationof B- and C-type axions corresponding to the same cycle,with e.g. (α, β) = (1, 1) in the leading instanton contri-bution. But the axion decay constants for C-type axionsturn out to be suppressed with respect to B-type axionsby a factor of gs. This makes it hard to ensure the hierar-

5 At present, the precise details of these non-perturbative correc-tions are not known, but along the lines of [10], we expect thereto be progress on this in the near future. It would be useful toknow in more detail in which cases they arise, and the preciseconditions under which they give non-holomorphic contributions.For the rather limited scope of this short note, the correctionsmerely need to exist and satisfy one requirement that we statebelow.

chy fr/fθ that was crucial for the mechanism describedabove, so this first attempt is unsuccessful.

An alternative that does work was proposed in [8]: amonodromy for a C-type axion can be obtained wrap-ping an NS5-brane on the two-cycle that supports theaxion. Another NS5-brane can wrap a homologous two-cycle with opposite orientation in order to cancel the tad-pole. For example, the two NS5-branes could be locatedin two different warped throats as in figure 4. Then a po-tential barrier prevents the classical instability, renderingthe configuration metastable. As the height of the bar-rier is controlled by the warping, the quantum instabilitydue to tunneling can be parametrically suppressed. Inaddition, warping provides control of the supersymmetrybreaking. Hence the crucial requirement is that the two-cycle Σr is a member of a family of homologous two-cyclesthat extends into a warped throat as shown in figure 4.Via S-duality we expect the induced monodromy term tobe

ε

gs(2π)5α′

√l4 +

(2πgsrfr

)2

' µ3r + const (14)

where ε encodes the warping. In the single-field axionmonodromy model it is important that (14) is the leadingterm in the potential. The analysis of [9] shows that apotentially competing effect comes from the backreactionon the geometry of the D3-charge induced by the largevev of the inflaton. In the same paper, a resolution of thisproblem was proposed that requires both the NS5-braneand the tadpole-canceling anti-NS5-brane to be placed ina warped bifurcated throat such that the backreaction isdue to a dipole as opposed to a monopole. In the presentmodel, we do not need to resort to such model-buildingtricks. The precise form of the monodromy term W (r) isnot crucial to the success of inflation, and in fact W (r)could be a steep potential that by itself would not giverise to slow-roll dynamics. Had we overlooked an effectthat would induce an η problem in the r direction, wewould simply need to consider a larger hierarchy fr/fθ.The Dante’s Inferno setup hence alleviates the difficultyof precisely determining the leading breaking of the shiftsymmetry.

Let us now turn to the question of genereting the smallhierarchy fr/fθ in the first place. In the string theoryconstruction, the axion decay constant for a C-type axioncorresponding to a generic two-cycle Σ is [4, 9]

f2Σ

M2P

=gs

8π2

cαΣΣvα

V, (15)

where cαβγ are intersection numbers, V is the volume ofthe compact space and vα are two-cycle volumes. Hence,the condition that needs to hold is

frfθ

=β

α

cγrrvγ

cγθθvγ� 1 , (16)

6

where again α and β are the coefficients of the linear com-bination of two-cycles involved in the non-perturbativeeffect. As stated earlier, in a typical situation a ratiofr/fθ ∼ O(10−1 − 10−2) is enough to give 60 e-folds ofslow-roll inflation within a region of subplanckian diam-eter. Without any further information, one could guessthat roughly half of the time α > β, which helps ourmechanism work. Even if α < β, it is only when β/α isa large number that our mechanism would fail. In typi-cal compactifications, intersection numbers and two-cyclevolumes can both easily range over one or two orders ofmagnitude. Hence, we believe that (16) can be easilysatisfied. Further work on ED1 instantons should helpclarify this situation.

As a side remark, there is another possibility to con-struct a small ratio fr/fθ. Recall that r corresponds to atwo-cycle that must extend into a warped region (other-wise the NS5-brane would break supersymmetry at thestring scale). Then fr is suppressed by a factor e−Atop

[8], which is the largest value taken by the warp factor inthe family of two-cycles homologous to Σr. This warpingsuppression could account for the required hierarchy incases where the ingredients in (16) do not offer enoughflexibility.

One can always contend that the small ratio fr/fθ thatwe used to suppress corrections may itself be unstable tocorrections. This was not investigated in [8, 9], sincethere was only one f . We believe that the case for thisto be stable is better than, for example, the case for theinflaton mass to be stable. It would be interesting toinvestigate this in more detail, however, for example intoy string models.

To summarize, we have shown how to embed Dante’sInferno in string theory as a straightforward generaliza-tion of the axion monodromy model in [8, 9]. The maindifference compared to earlier work is that we considerthe situation where non-perturbative effects (such asED1 instantons) and monodromy-inducing effects (suchas wrapped NS5-branes) are associated with two-cyclesthat partially overlap but are globally distinct. As far aswe can see, there is no obstruction in principle to the ex-istence of this class of configurations. We leave the studyof more detailed examples for future work.

Constraints

The main computability constraints of our model are:

• gs � 1 for string theory to be perturbative.

• V � Umod, where Umod is a moduli-stabilizationbarrier, for the inflationary dynamics not to destroymoduli stabilization.

• Volumes of cycles large in string units, v � 1, in

order to neglect world-sheet instantons and α′ cor-rections.

• Small (but not negligible) non-perturbative correc-tions, in order to neglect higher instanton contri-butions.

We have checked that these constraints are satisfied inthe same way as they are in the class of single field axionmonodromy models studied in [8, 9].

More constraints come from the consistency of thestring theory construction. The key observation here isthat these constraints arise when an axion with a mono-dromy receives a large vev. In Dante’s Inferno this vevis parametrically smaller than in single-field axion mono-dromy, by a factor fr/fθ. Hence each constraint is re-laxed by factors of this form.

First we consider the backreaction on the geometry,mainly due to the large induced D3-brane charge on theNS5-brane. We notice that the induced effective D3-brane charge is

ND3 =r

2πfr. (17)

This induced charge is now parametrically smaller thanin the single-field axion monodromy case, because the rrange required for 60 e-folds of inflation is now (takingthe linear case for definiteness) 11MP fr/fθ as opposedto 11MP . This extends the possible parameter range ofthe model as compared to the discussion in [9].

A second concern is the backreaction on the warp fac-tor that in turn changes the four-cycle volumes. Thelatter are stabilized, and hence this interplay can gener-ate an η problem for single-field axion monodromy. Twodifferent model building tricks to alleviate this problemwere proposed in [9]. For the present two-field model thisissue can conceivably be solved without resort to suchtricks. To see this, recall that the inflaton direction isnot r but a linear combination of r and θ. Even if the rdirection sees its approximate flatness destroyed by cor-rections, it is likely that slow-roll inflation still proceedsbecause the mass for the effective inflaton is suppressedwith respect to the mass of r by a small factor of the or-der fr/fθ. This is the reason why in the previous sectionswe stressed that our mechanism works for quite generalmonodromy terms W (r) in (2).

Finally, a last concern comes from the KK modes onthe world-volume of the NS5-brane that induces the mon-odromy for r. These become light due to the large fluxand an estimate [9] gives

m2KK,NS5 =

g2

g2 + (r/fr)2m2

KK, (18)

where g2 is the determinant of the metric on the two-cycle wrapped by the NS5-brane. This effect can be in-tuitively understood in a T-dual picture where a brane

7

with flux becomes a tilted brane. The larger the flux,the more times the T-dual brane winds around, and thelonger it becomes. The KK modes in this long directionbecome increasingly light. Again, in Dante’s Inferno, rtakes parametrically smaller vacuum expectation valuesthan in the single-field case, which ensures heavier KKmasses.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ulf Danielsson, Michael Haack,Liam McAllister, Henry Tye, Bret Underwood and GangXu for helpful comments. The research of E.P. wassupported in part by the National Science Foundationthrough grant NSF-PHY-0757868. M.B. thanks theSwedish Research Council (VR) for support. We are alsograteful to the Swedish Foundation for International Co-operation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) forpartial support.

[1] D. H. Lyth, “What would we learn by detecting a grav-itational wave signal in the cosmic microwave back-ground anisotropy?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1861[arXiv:hep-ph/9606387].

[2] D. Alighieri, “Commedia” (1304-1321). We recommendG. Petrocchi, ed., “La Commedia secondo l’antica vul-

gata”. Milan, Italy: Mondadori (1966).[3] T. Banks, M. Dine, P. J. Fox and E. Gorbatov, “On the

possibility of large axion decay constants,” JCAP 0306,001 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0303252].

[4] T. W. Grimm and J. Louis, “The effective action of N = 1Calabi-Yau orientifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 699, 387 (2004)[arXiv:hep-th/0403067].

[5] J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles and M. Peloso, “Completingnatural inflation,” JCAP 0501 (2005) 005 [arXiv:hep-ph/0409138].

[6] K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto, “Natural in-flation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons,” Phys.Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 3233.

[7] E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, “Monodromy in theCMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation,” Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 106003 [arXiv:0803.3085 [hep-th]].

[8] L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, “Grav-ity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy,”arXiv:0808.0706 [hep-th].

[9] R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal andG. Xu, “Oscillations in the CMB from Axion MonodromyInflation,” arXiv:0907.2916 [hep-th].

[10] P. G. Camara and E. Dudas, “Multi-instanton and stringloop corrections in toroidal orbifold models,” JHEP 0808(2008) 069 [arXiv:0806.3102 [hep-th]]. P. Camara, E. Du-das, work in progress.

[11] S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, “DeSitter vacua in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005(2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0301240].