daily report monday, 13 may 2019 contents · 5/13/2019 · daily report monday, 13 may 2019 this...
TRANSCRIPT
Daily Report Monday, 13 May 2019
This report shows written answers and statements provided on 13 May 2019 and the
information is correct at the time of publication (06:30 P.M., 13 May 2019). For the latest
information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements,
please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/
CONTENTS
ANSWERS 7
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND
INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 7
British Coal Staff
Superannuation Scheme and
Mineworkers' Pension Scheme 7
Business: Artificial Intelligence 7
Civil Nuclear Constabulary:
Pensions 8
Fiskars Group 8
Fiskars Group: Regional
Growth Fund 8
Fracking: Earthquakes 9
Fuel Poverty: Disability 10
Furniture and Furnishings
(Fire) (Safety) Regulations
1988 10
Horizon 2020 10
Parental Leave 11
Post Office 11
Regional Growth Fund: Grants 12
Service Industries: Migrant
Workers 12
Trading Standards: Finance 13
Whirlpool Corporation: Tumble
Dryers 13
Wind Power: Neighbourhood
Development Plans 14
Wind Power: Seas and
Oceans 14
CABINET OFFICE 14
Business: ICT 14
Cabinet Office: Emerdata 15
Conflict, Stability and Security
Fund 15
Counter-terrorism: Pakistan 16
Elections: Proof of Identity 21
Electoral Register: Young
People 21
Electronic Government: Proof
of Identity 22
European Parliament:
Elections 22
Grenfell Tower: Fires 23
Pakistan: Rule of Law 24
Public Sector: Procurement 25
CHURCH COMMISSIONERS 25
Christianity: Africa 25
Overseas Aid: Sri Lanka 25
DEFENCE 26
Armed Forces: Recruitment 26
Army 26
Army: Deployment 26
Army: Military Bases 26
Astute Class Submarines and
Trident Submarines 27
Australia: Military Alliances 27
Brunei: Joint Exercises 27
Defence and National
Rehabilitation Centre:
Veterans 28
Defence Nuclear Safety
Regulator: Accountability 28
Defence: Procurement 29
Devonport Dockyard: Trident
Submarines 29
DMRC Headley Court:
Veterans 29
EU Defence Policy 30
Heavy Equipment
Transporters: Location 30
Iceland: Military Aid 31
International Military Services:
Debts 31
Iran: International Military
Services 31
Ministry of Defence: Emerdata 32
Navy: Persian Gulf 32
Nuclear Weapons: Finance 32
Nuclear Weapons: Transport 33
Submarines: Cost
Effectiveness 33
Submarines: Nuclear Reactors 33
Trident Submarines: Design 33
Trident Submarines: Repairs
and Maintenance 34
Trident: Finance 34
Type 31 Frigates:
Procurement 34
USA: Middle East 35
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND
SPORT 35
Business: ICT 35
Culture: Finance 36
Department for Digital,
Culture, Media and Sport:
Secondment 36
Internet: Security 37
Sports: Environment
Protection 37
St George's Day 38
EDUCATION 38
Apprentices: Wolverhampton
North East 38
Children: Day Care 39
Educational Exchanges 39
Erasmus+ Programme 40
Fossil Fuels: Universities 40
Free School Meals 41
Free School Meals: Barnsley 41
Institutes of Technology 42
Marriage Guidance: Finance 42
Pupil Exclusions 42
Schools: Local Government
Services 45
Social Services:
Northamptonshire 45
Speech and Language
Disorders: Training 45
Students: Loans 46
Teachers: Training 46
Tiffin-Brown, Dylan 47
Universities 47
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND
RURAL AFFAIRS 47
Agriculture: Diversification 47
Birds: Pest Control 48
Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs:
Secondment 48
Diesel Engines: Urban Areas 49
Electronic Training Aids 49
Food: Packaging 49
Grouse Moors 50
Hares Preservation Act 1892 50
Hedges and Ditches 50
Pheasants: Imports 50
Solid Fuels: Prices 51
FOREIGN AND
COMMONWEALTH OFFICE 52
Afghanistan: Sikhs 52
Arctic: China and Russia 52
Cameroon: Human Rights 53
Civil Servants: Training 54
Colombia: Human Rights 54
Hamed bin Haydara 54
Iran: Foreign Relations 55
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe 55
North Korea: Christianity 55
Religious Freedom 56
St Helena: Fisheries 56
St Helena: Fishing Vessels 57
Yemen: Capital Punishment 57
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 58
Asthma: Air Pollution 58
Asthma: Medical Treatments 58
Autism: Diagnosis 59
Blood: Contamination 59
Blood: Viral Diseases 60
Cannabis: Medical Treatments 60
Chronic Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease: Death 61
Eating Disorders 62
Food: Labelling 62
General Practitioners:
Students 62
Health Services: Artificial
Intelligence 63
Hepatitis: Disease Control 63
Hepatitis: Primary Health Care 64
Hospitals: Discharges 65
Medical Records: Databases 67
Mental Capacity 68
Mental Health Inter-ministerial
Group 68
Mental Health Services: Wirral 68
NHS and Social Services:
Migrant Workers 69
NHS: Drugs 69
NHS: Fees and Charges 70
NHS: Migrant Workers 71
NHS: Vacancies 72
Nurses: Pay 72
Obesity: Children 73
Ophthalmic Services: ICT 74
Ovarian Cancer 74
Pregnancy: Screening 75
Psychiatry 75
Public Health: Finance 75
HOME OFFICE 77
101 Calls: Fees and Charges 77
Animal Experiments 78
Animal Experiments: Primates 78
Asylum: Applications 79
Asylum: Religion 79
Biometrics: Edinburgh 80
Domestic Abuse 80
Educational Testing Service 81
Educational Testing Service:
Prosecutions 81
Entry Clearances: Biometrics 81
Firearms: Licensing 82
Free Movement of People:
Arts and Musicians 82
Home Office: Emerdata 83
Home Office: Secondment 83
Immigrants: Employment 84
Immigration: EU Nationals 84
Overseas Students: English
Language 85
Police: Pensions 85
Theft: Wales 86
UK Visas and Immigration:
Conditions of Employment 86
Undocumented Migrants:
Detainees 87
Visas: Ministers of Religion 87
Visas: Sponsorship 88
Windrush Generation:
Compensation 89
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT 89
Buildings: Insulation 89
Community Land Trusts 90
Domestic Abuse: Victim
Support Schemes 91
Housing 91
Housing: Construction 92
Housing: Disability 92
Housing: Older People 92
Marriage Guidance: Finance 93
Mobile Homes: Council Tax 93
Rough Sleeping: Barnsley 93
Social Rented Housing:
Disability 94
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT 94
CDC 94
CDC: Staff 95
Department for International
Development: Bullying 95
Developing Countries: Climate
Change 96
East Africa: Storms 96
Gambia: Overseas Aid 96
South Asia: Disaster Relief 97
Yemen: Cholera 97
Yemen: Humanitarian Aid 98
INTERNATIONAL TRADE 98
Department for International
Trade: Advertising 98
Free Trade: Thailand 99
World Trade Organisation 99
JUSTICE 99
Age of Criminal Responsibility 99
Animal Welfare: Prosecutions 100
Animal Welfare: Romford 100
Courts: Telephone Services 100
Debt Collection 101
Judiciary: Females 101
Ministry of Justice:
Consultants 102
Police Cautions 103
Prison Officers: Riot Control
Weapons 103
Prison Sentences 104
Prison Sentences: EU
Countries 104
Prisoners' Release: Housing 105
Prisons: Contracts 105
Probation: Standards 106
Wales Office: Contracts 106
Women's Centres: Wales 107
Young Offenders: Criminal
Proceedings 108
NORTHERN IRELAND 108
Northern Ireland Office:
Bullying 108
PRIME MINISTER 108
Foreign and Commonwealth
Office: Departmental
Responsibilities 108
TRANSPORT 109
Abellio Group and Arriva 109
Aviation: Global Positioning
System 109
Aviation: Safety 110
Aviation: Training 110
Bramley Station: CCTV 110
East Coast Railway Line 111
East Midlands Rail Franchise 111
East Midlands Trains:
Pensions 112
East-West Rail Link 112
Motor Vehicles: Exhaust
Emissions 112
Northern: Standards 113
Public Transport: Disability 113
Rail Delivery Group: Finance 113
Railway Signals: Repairs and
Maintenance 114
Railways: Compensation 114
Railways: Franchises 114
Railways: Greater London 115
Railways: Stoke on Trent 116
Roads: Safety 116
Thameslink, Southern and
Great Northern Rail Franchise 116
West Coast Partnership Rail
Franchise: Pensions 117
TREASURY 117
101 Calls: Fees and Charges 117
Cash Dispensing: Fees and
Charges 117
Child Benefit: British Nationals
Abroad 118
Community Land Trusts:
Capital Gains Tax 119
Credit Unions 120
Employment Agencies: Tax
Avoidance 121
Fuels: Excise Duties 121
Income Tax 122
Mortgages 122
Public Sector: Tax Avoidance 123
Shops: Payment Methods 123
Social Security Benefits 124
UK Asset Resolution 124
WALES 126
Wales Office: Bullying 126
WORK AND PENSIONS 126
Children: Maintenance 126
Department for Work and
Pensions: Secondment 126
Food Banks: Ogmore 127
Health 127
Housing Benefit: Domestic
Abuse 128
Members: Correspondence 129
Personal Independence
Payment: Appeals 129
Social Security Benefits:
Coventry 130
Social Security Benefits: EU
Nationals 130
Unemployment 131
Universal Credit 131
Universal Credit: Appeals 133
Universal Credit: Disability 133
Universal Credit: Private
Rented Housing 134
Universal Credit: Wales 134
WRITTEN STATEMENTS 136
JUSTICE 136
Publication of the response to
the ‘Fit for the future:
transforming the court and
tribunal estate’ consultation
and the Court & Tribunal
Design Guide 136
Notes:
Questions marked thus [R] indicate that a relevant interest has been declared.
Questions with identification numbers of 900000 or greater indicate that the question was originally tabled as an
oral question and has since been unstarred.
ANSWERS
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY
British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme and Mineworkers' Pension Scheme
Grahame Morris: [252054]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent
estimate he has made of the total value of the (a) Mineworkers Pension Scheme and (b)
British Coal Staff Superannuation scheme.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme valuation conducted by the Government Actuary
concluded last year. The market value of the scheme’s assets on 30 September 2017
was £12,241 million.
A similar valuation for the British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme concluded
recently. The market value of the Scheme’s assets on 31 March 2018 was £9,367
million.
Business: Artificial Intelligence
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251189]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
guidance his Department has issued to businesses on preparing their workforce for the
effect of the introduction of Artificial Intelligence.
Chris Skidmore:
The Industrial Strategy sets out the Government’s vision to make the UK a global
centre for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data innovation. We have committed to
improving the UK's system for training in digital skills and lifelong learning, to ensure
that working people have the support they need to benefit from the opportunities
offered by automation towards a higher-wage future. Government is in regular
discussion with business and business representative organisations, including issues
affecting the workforce.
The AI Sector Deal brings together commitments from Government, Industry and
Academia in a £0.95bn package of support to promote the adoption and use of AI,
supported by up to £110 million government investment, which includes:
• 16 New Centres for Doctoral Training at universities across the country, delivering
1,000 new PhDs over the next 5 years;
• New prestigious AI fellowships to attract and retain the top AI talent, underpinned
by up to £50m of funding agreed at Autumn Budget; and
• Industry-funding for new AI Masters places.
Government is investing £406 million in maths, digital and technical education, and in
the 2018 Autumn Budget, my rt. hon. Friend Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer
announced an initial £100 million to start the roll out of the National Retraining
Scheme, an ambitious, far-reaching programme to drive adult learning and retraining.
Civil Nuclear Constabulary: Pensions
Martin Whitfield: [251427]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent
assessment he has made of the suitability of the Civil Nuclear Constabulary joining the
Alpha Pensions scheme as directed by the Public Service Pensions Act 2013.
Andrew Stephenson:
As is the case with other Public Sector employees, the Civil Nuclear Police
Authority’s employees will move into the Alpha Pensions scheme. A decision to
modify the statutory scheme ultimately rests with HM Treasury and the Cabinet
Office. BEIS officials are engaging with all interested parties to provide certainty for
CNPA and its staff.
Fiskars Group
Ruth Smeeth: [252037]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
discussions he has had with Wedgwood Waterford Royal Doulton on (a) their restructure
and (b) the effect of that restructure on (i) the UK ceramics manufacturing sector and (ii)
their Regional Growth Fund grant award.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Regional Growth Fund team have been in discussions with WWRD UK Ltd
regarding the restructure and the effect of the restructure in relation to the Regional
Growth Fund grant award.
Whilst the Global restructuring of WWRD UK Ltd and the associated job losses at the
Barlaston facility is disappointing, with a consequential impact on individual
employees and the local economy, I understand high end products, design, product
development and global marketing of products will continue to be based in the UK.
Fiskars Group: Regional Growth Fund
Ruth Smeeth: [252034]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, when he last
assessed that Waterford Wedgwood Royal Doulton was compliant with the terms of its
£5.1million grant from the Regional Growth Fund.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As the project remains in monitoring until 2022, the Regional Growth Fund team
continue to monitor and discuss project developments with WWRD UK Ltd, as they
do with all Regional Growth Fund awards.
Ruth Smeeth: [252036]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with reference
to the provisions in the Regional Growth Fund grant to Waterford Wedgwood Royal
Doulton (WWRD) to maintain manufacturing jobs on site and the recent announcement of
103 job losses at WWRD, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of that
grant award to WWRD.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Regional Growth Fund award to WWRD UK Ltd is monitored for a ten year
period until 31 March 2022, as such the Regional Growth Fund team continue to
discuss project developments with the Company, as they do with all Regional Growth
Fund awards.
Fracking: Earthquakes
Sammy Wilson: [250015]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, on how many
occasions the Government guidelines on earth tremors have been breached by fracking
operations in each of the last three years.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Traffic Light System for monitoring induced seismicity was introduced after
consideration of advice from three scientists, following operations at Cuadrilla’s
Preese Hall site in 2011. The level of magnitude 0.5 at which operators must pause
operations, was set in consultation with industry as an appropriate precautionary
measure. These regulations have been working as intended and there are no plans
to review the traffic light system.
Three seismic events, equal or greater than magnitude 0.5, were recorded during
pumping operations at Preston New Road between October and December 2018.
Following these red traffic light events the operator temporarily paused operations,
reduced pressure and monitored for any further seismic events.
Sammy Wilson: [250017]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what plans
the Government has to review the guidelines on earth tremors caused by fracking
operations.
Kelly Tolhurst:
I refer the hon. Member the answer I gave the hon. Member for Lewisham East on 1
May 2019 to Question 247160.
Sammy Wilson: [250018]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
representations his Department has received from (a) fracking companies, (b)
environmental groups and (c) the shale gas commissioner on the appropriateness of
current guidelines on tremors caused by fracking.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Department routinely receives correspondence from a wide range of
stakeholders in relation to the regulatory regime for shale gas extraction, including
the traffic light system.
The Traffic Light System for monitoring induced seismicity was introduced after
consideration of advice from scientists, following operations at Cuadrilla’s Preese Hall
site in 2011. The level of magnitude 0.5 at which operators must pause operations,
was set in consultation with industry as an appropriate precautionary measure. These
regulations have been working as intended and there are no plans to review the
traffic light system.
Fuel Poverty: Disability
Stephen Morgan: [250516]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with reference
to Scope’s report Disability Price Tag 2019, what assessment he has made of the effect
of the extra costs faced by disabled people on levels of fuel poverty in the UK.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As noted by Scope in their report, we have taken steps to make support accessible to
disabled people. This includes expanding the eligibility criteria for the Energy
Company Obligation to include those in receipt of Disability Living Allowance and
Personal Independence Payment.
Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988
Mrs Madeleine Moon: [251261]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, pursuant to
the Answer of 8 April 2019 to Question 239920, when his Department plans to publish its
response to the consultation on proposed changes to the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire)
(Safety) Regulations 1988; and if he will make a statement.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Department will publish its response to the 2016 consultation in due course.
This is a complex issue and it is absolutely vital that the Government gets this right:
we are committed to reviewing these regulations to ensure that the highest levels of
fire safety are maintained while minimising risks to health and the environment.
Horizon 2020
Chi Onwurah: [249282]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
discussions the Government has had with the EU Commission on facilitating the UK’s
future association with the Horizon Europe programme.
Chris Skidmore:
In May 2018, the UK met with the EU Commission to discuss the future UK-EU
relationship on science, research and innovation. During this discussion, and
throughout our ongoing engagement since that initial meeting, we have made clear
that we would like the option to fully associate to the Horizon Europe Programme.
The Minister attended Competitiveness Council in February 2019, and hopes to
attend the next Competitiveness Council in May 2019 for further constructive
discussions about research and innovation with his EU counterparts.
Although the UK cannot associate to the future Programme until it has been
negotiated and adopted, and only after we have exited the EU, during this period as
an EU Member State we are actively engaging in the development of the Horizon
Europe proposal at all levels, including through the EU Institutions, in line with UK
interests.
Parental Leave
David Simpson: [251985]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps his
Department is taking to support shared parental leave.
Kelly Tolhurst:
In 2018 the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Government
Equalities Office funded a £1.5m campaign to raise awareness of the Shared
Parental Leave and Pay scheme amongst parents. This was followed by further
communications activity, aimed at employers, in 2019. Both campaigns were
underpinned by improved tools and guidance for parents which can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/shared-parental-leave-and-pay-guidance-and-tools-for-
parents.
Post Office
Mr Kevan Jones: [247612]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department met the Senior Independent Director of Post Office
Limited in the last 12 months.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As the Special Shareholder of Post Office Limited, my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of
State appoints a Non-Executive Representative to the Post Office board to provide
shareholder oversight of the company. In their independent role, it would not be
appropriate for Ministers to regularly meet with the Senior Independent Director of
Post Office Limited. Generally, ministers have engaged with Post Office Limited, but
they have not met the Senior Independent Director of Post Office Limited in the last
12 months.
Regional Growth Fund: Grants
Ruth Smeeth: [252035]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he
has reclaimed grant funds from a successful applicant to the Regional Growth Fund that
has been found not to comply with the terms of the grant.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Regional Growth Fund awards are monitored to ensure the agreed outcomes of the
project are delivered.
Any project being undertaken using investment from the Regional Growth Fund must
be delivered in full. If a project fails to deliver on what was first proposed, we would
recover the appropriate level of grant payment.
I can confirm that this has happened on some successful Regional Growth Fund
awards.
Service Industries: Migrant Workers
Paul Farrelly: [250794]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he
is taking to ensure that non-EU migrants working in the (a) cleaning and (b) hospitality
industry receive the statutory rights they are entitled to under UK law.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Non-EU migrants working legally in the UK are entitled to the same workplace
statutory protections as any other worker. Fair and effective enforcement is central to
the Good Work Plan, which sets out the biggest upgrade of employment rights in a
generation. Building on existing minimum wage and agency worker enforcement, we
are expanding state enforcement to cover holiday payments for the most vulnerable
workers and intermediary companies that operate in the agency worker market.
Government has taken concrete measures to increase the number of labour market
inspectors and extend their coverage.
• Government has increased funding for HMRC’s enforcement of the National
Minimum and Living Wage (NMW) to a record high of £26.3 million for 2018/19.
• Funding for the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) has also risen in
the last two years to reflect the expansion of its remit to tackle labour exploitation.
The GLAA now receives over £7m per year in funding, up from £4.5m in 2016/17.
• The Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate has seen its funding increase
from £0.5m in 2016/17 to £0.725m in 2018/19.
These three enforcement bodies continue to ensure workers receive the protections
they are entitled to. As well as responding to every complaint they receive, all three
undertake proactive, intelligence-led enforcement, targeting employers and sectors
where the risks of non-compliance are highest, including in the cleaning and
hospitality sectors.
Government is also exploring options for a single labour market enforcement body –
we will publish proposals on this for consultation shortly. More recently we announced
that this consultation will consider extending the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse
Authority’s licensing scheme to further sectors and that we will ensure trade unions
and businesses are consulted on the strategic direction of labour market
enforcement.
Trading Standards: Finance
Stephen Morgan: [251340]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
assessment his Department has made of the effect of recent trends in the level of local
authority funding on the ability of trading standards bodies to enforce product safety
measures.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Government identified the need for national leadership and co-ordination of the
product safety system and established the Office for Product Safety and Standards in
January 2018 to fulfil this role. The Office has built capability to lead on scientific and
technical issues, including commissioning a research programme; set up
arrangements to deal with national product safety incidents; and formed a trading
standards co-ordination unit to support the work that Local Authorities carry out on
product safety in their local areas.
We value the important role that Local Authority Trading Standards carry out in
enforcing product safety measures, protecting consumers and providing advice to
businesses at a local level. Local Authorities are independent from central
government and are responsible for their own finances and funding decisions,
accountable to their local electorates. As part of its support for Local Authority
Trading Standards, OPSS has made available £500,000 per annum to Local
Authorities for product safety testing, trained over 650 trading standards staff from
211 Local Authorities and provided scientific and technical support in responding to
incidents to increase their capability on product safety regulation.
Whirlpool Corporation: Tumble Dryers
Stephen Morgan: [251339]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether his
Department has plans to undertake a further investigation into the safety of Whirlpool
tumble dryers.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Chief Executive of the Office for Product Safety and Standards met senior
Whirlpool officials in Birmingham on 2nd May to discuss their response to the
requirements placed upon them by OPSS following the review of Whirlpool’s tumble
dryer modification programme. He advised them on steps necessary to fulfil their
obligations. The investigation remains on-going as Whirlpool address these
requirements.
Wind Power: Neighbourhood Development Plans
Clive Lewis: [251417]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
areas in the UK have been designated as suitable for onshore wind in (a) local and (b)
neighbourhood plans in England since the Written Statement of 18 June 2015, Official
Report 9WS on Local Planning.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Sites identified as suitable for onshore wind development can be located in local
authorities’ local or neighbourhood plans, all of which are available for the public to
view.
Wind Power: Seas and Oceans
Chi Onwurah: [252104]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
guidance is available to wind farm developers and operatives to help minimise impact on
marine life of off shore wind farms.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The National Policy Statements for Energy (EN-1) and Renewable Energy (EN-3) set
out how the developers of offshore wind farms should consider their impacts on
marine life in any applications for development consent for them. Issue specific
guidance on minimising the potential impacts of offshore wind farms on marine life is
available from the relevant statutory nature conservation bodies [Natural England,
Natural Resources Wales and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee] throughout
the planning and development cycles of an offshore wind farm. The potential impacts
of proposed projects on marine life and on other relevant issues will be considered in
a public examination of any development consent application that is made.
CABINET OFFICE
Business: ICT
Paul Farrelly: [251969]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department has taken to ensure
that the public sector has the required IT infrastructure in place to enable a paperless
society.
Oliver Dowden:
The Government Digital Service works with departments across central government
to build digital capability, develop and implement common tools and standards, and
ensure government remains focused on the needs of end users when designing
digital services.
The Local Digital Declaration is a set of principles and commitments by which central
and local government will work together to share tools and best practice in order to
help get more public services online.
Over 16 million customers now access their Personal Tax Account online; over 90%
of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Association’s (DVLA) transactions (over 1 billion
in 2017/18) are now completed online; and over 5.7 million people have used the
voter registration digital service.
Cabinet Office: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250041]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether (a) his Department, (b) his
Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public bodies have entered
into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Oliver Dowden:
Records of contracts above £10,000 in central government and £25,000 in the wider
public sector are published on Contracts Finder:
https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Search
Conflict, Stability and Security Fund
Emily Thornberry: [249954]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the findings of the
independent Overseas Security and Justice Assistance audit into the Conflict Stability
and Security Fund commissioned by the Joint Funds Unit.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation ahead of it being shared with the
Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Counter-terrorism: Pakistan
Emily Thornberry: [249948]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the effect of
the Government’s Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms Initiative in
Pakistan on the number of people who have been sentenced to death in those courts.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation, ahead of it being shared with
the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Emily Thornberry: [249950]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make it her policy to commission a
review of the effectiveness of UK’s Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative in Pakistan.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation ahead of it being shared with the
Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Emily Thornberry: [249951]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the effect of
the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms Initiative in Pakistan on
conviction rates in the Pakistani anti-terror courts in (a) 2017 and (b) 2018.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation, ahead of it being shared with
the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Emily Thornberry: [249952]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the human rights risk
assessments undertaken for the Government’s Counter-Terrorism Associated
Prosecutorial Reforms Initiative in Pakistan in relation to the Government’s policy on
Overseas Security and Justice Assistance.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation ahead of it being shared with the
Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Emily Thornberry: [249953]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on what dates Ministerial approval was (a)
sought and (b) given for human rights risk assessments carried out for the UK’s Counter-
Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms Initiative in Pakistan under the OSJA policy.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation ahead of it being shared with the
Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Elections: Proof of Identity
Cat Smith: [252044]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the cost was to the public purse of the
2019 voter ID pilot schemes; and how much funding was allocated to each local authority
that participated.
Kevin Foster:
Voter ID is part of a body of work this Government is delivering to strengthen the
integrity of our electoral system and give the public confidence that our elections are
secure and fit for the 21st century.
As was the case for the 2018 pilots, the 2019 pilot costs will be confirmed when they
are known, which will be after the pilot authorities have completed their work. Funding
for the additional cost of piloting voter ID will be provided to each local authority by
the Cabinet Office.
Electoral Register: Young People
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251213]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whats steps the Government is taking to
encourage young people to register to vote.
Kevin Foster:
The Government is committed to respecting, protecting and promoting our
democracy. We want to build upon recent record levels of individuals registering to
vote and participating in elections. Our Register to Vote website is widely used by
young people: over 7.83 million online applications have been submitted by 16-24
year olds since the service was introduced in 2014. Ahead of the General Election in
June 2017 young people aged under 25 were particularly engaged, submitting over 1
million applications - more than 35% of all applications received in the pre-election
period.
Since then we have taken further steps to promote democratic engagement amongst
young people. Making use of the Suffrage Fund, we have delivered three projects to
promote youth engagement: a scheme to recruit and train 1000 youth Democracy
Ambassadors; the development and publication of a toolkit for parliamentarians to
engage young people; and a new history and citizenship resource for secondary
schools ( www.suffrageresources.org.uk ).
The Government’s recent report, Democratic Engagement: Respecting, Protecting
and Promoting Our Democracy, sets out how we work with partners to encourage
democratic participation. This includes National Democracy Week, which convenes
youth focused organisations such as the British Youth Council, UK Youth, Elevation
Networks and Patchwork Foundation to deliver targeted democratic engagement
activity. The report also highlights steps to help Higher Education providers work with
local authorities to promote electoral registration amongst their student populations.
DCMS provides funding for the UK Youth Parliament, Youth Select Committee and
Make Your Mark ballot which support young people to raise issues on local and
national levels.
Make Your Mark is a ballot of youth views which gives the UK Youth Parliament its
mandate and gets young people, aged 11-18, involved in democracy, with over 1
million young people voting in 2018. (
http://www.ukyouthparliament.org.uk/makeyourmark/ )
Electronic Government: Proof of Identity
Jo Platt: [250495]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 2 May 2019 to
Question 248768, whether his Department has any plans to allow Document Checking
Service access to non-GOV.UK Verify identity providers.
Oliver Dowden:
At this stage, the Document Checking Service is only available to GOV.UK Verify
identity providers. However, we are aware there is demand to open up access to
government data and are exploring opportunities in this area.
European Parliament: Elections
Catherine West: [251330]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the process is for the suspension of the
use of EC6/UC1 in certain circumstances.
Kevin Foster:
The European Parliamentary Elections (Franchise of Relevant Citizens of the Union)
Regulations 2001 require EU citizens to provide a declaration before they can vote.
These Regulations were made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act
1972 and implement Council Directive 93/109/EC which lays down the arrangements
for EU citizens to vote and stand as candidates in another Member State. This is a
requirement under EU law which is intended to prevent double voting across the EU.
Tom Brake: [251885]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the potential
merits of enabling EU citizens to present European Parliament Voter registration forms at
polling stations on 23 May 2019 to ensure that they are not disfranchised following the
time taken to announce the holding of European elections.
Kevin Foster:
The latest date in which an EU citizen can submit a European Parliament Voter
Registration Form to register as an elector in the European Parliament elections is 12
working days before the date of the election. The 12 working day deadline is based
on two provisions relating to the application process and the publication of, and
alterations to, the register before the election. The provisions are contained in section
13B of the Representation of the People Act 1983 and regulation 29 of the
Representation of the People (England and Wales) Regulations 2001; and the
equivalent provisions in the Representation of the People (Scotland) Regulations
2001 and Representation of the People (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2008 as
applied by Schedule 001 of the European Parliamentary Elections (Franchise of
Relevant Citizens of the Union) Regulations 2001. Council Directive 93/109/EC
requires all Member States to send the details of any EU citizens’ declarations to their
Home State to ensure an EU citizen does not vote twice, both here and in another EU
country. The Council Directive specifies that this has to be done “sufficiently in
advance of polling day”
Tom Brake: [251886]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many and what proportion of EU nationals
living in the UK registered to vote in European Parliament elections in (a) 2014 and (b)
2019.
Kevin Foster:
The Cabinet Office does not hold information on the numbers of eligible electors nor
information on the number of European nationals resident in the UK who register to
vote in European Parliamentary elections.
Estimates of the number of eligible people on the registers for electoral events are
published by the Electoral Commission following each poll, but do not include a
breakdown of the numbers of EU citizens eligible to vote. The report on the 2014
European Parliamentary elections was produced by the Electoral Commission in July
2014 and is available online at: www.electoralcommission.org.uk.
Each Electoral Registration Officer maintains a register for their own local area. Some
headline registration statistics by area are collated and published annually by the
Office for National Statistics, however, this does not include a breakdown of the
numbers of EU citizens registered to vote.
The latest bulletin is available at:
www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/elections/electoralregistration.
Grenfell Tower: Fires
Emma Dent Coad: [252127]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make an assessment of the
implications for the Government's policies of the report entitled, Family reflections on
Grenfell: No voice left unheard, published on 8 May 2019 by Inquest; and if she will make
a statement.
Mr David Lidington:
The Government set up the independent Grenfell Tower Inquiry to get to the truth of
what happened, deliver justice for victims, survivors, bereaved families and the wider
community, and to ensure that such a terrible tragedy could never happen again. The
timing and handling of the Inquiry is a matter for the independent Inquiry and the
Government hopes that the report for phase 1 will be published soon.
Pakistan: Rule of Law
Emily Thornberry: [249949]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the most recent Annual
Review which was conducted for the Rule of Law Programme in Pakistan.
Mr David Lidington:
The Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) takes its responsibility to do no harm
very seriously. All CSSF programmes comply with the UK’s domestic and
international human rights obligations and have robust measures in place to protect
the human rights of beneficiaries.
In order for programme teams to be able to assess the risks of UK activity that could
affect human rights, all security and justice assistance is subject to Overseas Security
and Justice Assistance (OSJAs). The OSJA is a risk management system used
across Government to assess risk and consider what mitigation might be appropriate.
The OSJA Guidance specifies at what point Ministerial approval is required.
In order to determine the effectiveness of project activity, all CSSF programmes are
subject to Annual Reviews, which score how effectively programmes have delivered
their outputs and outcomes. In making an assessment the Annual Review considers
how programme teams manage commercial partnerships, risk and budgets, adapt to
changing contexts, , as well as assessing value for money. The Joint Funds Unit
(JFU) plans to publish the Rule of Law 2017/18 Annual Review summary before the
end of this Parliamentary session.
Minister Field, the FCO Minister responsible for South Asia, receives regular updates
on the risks associated with the Rule of Law programme’s activities. In addition, I
reviewed all the relevant programme documentation ahead of it being shared with the
Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, who have taken an interest in this
programme and requested further, sensitive documents on it.
The OSJA covering the Counter-Terrorism Associated Prosecutorial Reforms
Initiative was fully reviewed in December 2018. Completed OSJA checklists are
sensitive internal documents providing an assessment of the human rights situation in
a country at a given time and are regularly updated. These are not published. The
Information Commissioner has previously reviewed and agreed with a Government
decision not to disclose an OSJA on Pakistan.
Last year the JFU commissioned an independent OSJA audit, in order to get a better
understanding of how they are used across the CSSF. The audit itself contains a
number of sensitive in-depth samples of OSJAs and therefore there are no plans to
publish the audit.
Public Sector: Procurement
Jo Platt: [250503]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 25 April 2019 to
Question 245992, Public Sector: Procurement, whether his Department routinely monitor
the proportion of public sector buyers that utilise the Digital Marketplace.
Oliver Dowden:
All information concerning buyers that have used the Digital Marketplace is in the
public domain. This can be found at the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/digital-marketplace-sales
CHURCH COMMISSIONERS
Christianity: Africa
Jim Shannon: [252642]
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what
steps the Church of England is taking to tackle the persecution of Christians in African
countries; and what steps the Church of England is taking with the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office to highlight the persecution of Christians in those countries.
Dame Caroline Spelman:
The Church of England mission agencies are supporting partner churches and
communities in Africa to help them address the challenges of inter-religious living.
The submission by the Church of England and the Catholic Bishops Conference of
England and Wales to the Foreign Secretary’s independent review into persecuted
Christians sets out recommendations as to the steps that the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office can take to support Christian communities and other religious
whose right to freedom of religion or belief is being impinged.
The submission from the Church of England can be read here:
https://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/news/latest-news/anglicans-and-catholics-
make-joint-submission-foreign-office-review-persecuted
Overseas Aid: Sri Lanka
Jim Shannon: [252646]
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what
discussions the Church of England has had with the Department for International
Development on ensuring aid reaches people in Sri Lanka who need it most.
Dame Caroline Spelman:
The Church of England has had no discussions with the Department for International
Development on aid to Sri Lanka, but the Diocese of Leeds which has had a
companion link with Sri Lanka for nearly 40 years, is in regular contact with the
Anglican church of Sri Lanka, as to how best the Church can contribute to human
flourishing in Sri Lanka.
DEFENCE
Armed Forces: Recruitment
John Lamont: [251335]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps she is taking to increase
recruitment to the armed forces from rural areas.
Mark Lancaster:
The Armed Forces recruit nationally. The geographic footprint of Armed Forces
Career Offices across the UK is complemented by dedicated call centres and online
recruiting operations, ensuring that members of rural or isolated communities have
the same opportunity to join the Armed Forces as anyone else. In addition, the
Services conduct outreach engagement programmes across the whole of the UK,
delivering events such as career fairs, tactical campaigns and roadshows, supported
by web-based information services and social media campaigns.
Army
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251199]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many Heavy Armoured Brigades her
Department plans to have in the British Army Future Force Structure.
Mark Lancaster:
The 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review set out the Government's intent for
the Army to deliver, as part of Joint Force 2025, a warfighting division drawn from two
armoured infantry brigades and two new strike brigades.
Army: Deployment
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251197]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the estimate he has made of the
deployment period for the Heavy Forces.
Mark Lancaster:
For reasons of operational security, the Ministry of Defence does not disclose
detailed information regarding the readiness of formations and units. That readiness
will be constructed from many components, including training, the preparedness of
personnel, and logistic enablers. The speed of deployment would also be dependent
on the nature of the threat, capabilities required and geography of deployment.
Army: Military Bases
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251198]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans she has to forward base the UK's
Heavy Forces.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251200]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress has been made on the
deployability of the Main Battle Tank throughout Europe.
Mark Lancaster:
The British Army maintains the ability to deploy its Challenger 2 main battle tanks
throughout Europe, with a number currently deployed in Estonia as part of NATO's
enhanced Forward Presence. This is assisted by the Government's announcement
last year that a residual Army presence in Germany will be maintained as a
foundation on which to enhance readiness on mainland Europe; a number of main
battle tanks are already forward based there. Defence is continuing to examine how
we might forward deploy Army capability in the future but no conclusions have been
reached.
Astute Class Submarines and Trident Submarines
Jonathan Edwards: [250772]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment she has made of the effect
of delays to the Astute submarine programme on the delivery of the Dreadnought
programme.
Stuart Andrew:
The Dreadnought submarine programme remains within budget and on track to
deliver the first boat in the early 2030s.
Australia: Military Alliances
Andrew Rosindell: [249868]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans his Department has for defence co-
operation with Australia in the next 12 months.
Mark Lancaster:
Australia is one of our very closest defence partners. We work bilaterally and in multi-
lateral fora such as the Five Eyes grouping and the Five Powers Defence
Arrangements. We are cooperating on operations, notably in Afghanistan,
collaborating on key defence capabilities, including the Type 26 Global Combat Ship
and maintain regular exchanges of personnel. This is underpinned by regular
meetings between Ministers and senior officers and officials, and the annual AUKMIN
discussions between the Secretary of State for Defence, the Foreign Secretary and
their Australian counterparts.
Brunei: Joint Exercises
Nia Griffith: [251252]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 2 May 2019 to
Question 248622 on Brunei: Joint Exercises, how many military personnel from (a) the
UK and (b) Brunei will take part in Exercise Grypus Trail 19/1.
Mark Lancaster:
Approximately 100 UK military personnel and around 25 Brunei military personnel will
participate in Exercise Gryphus Trail.
Defence and National Rehabilitation Centre: Veterans
Nicky Morgan: [251259]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans his Department has to grant
veterans access to Stanford Hall for rehabilitation purposes.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
The Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) mission is to provide sick and
injured Service personnel the rehabilitation they require to be able to return to duty or
transition back into civilian life, at which point the NHS becomes responsible for their
care.
The access policy at the new DMRC Stanford Hall remains unchanged from that
previously in place at DMRC Headley Court, in that there is no provision generally for
veterans to access the facility. We have, however, in collaboration with the NHS,
established a specialist clinic whereby NHS Limb Fitting Centres can refer selected
veterans (who are ex-DMRC patients) back to the DMRC for assistance with the
management of amputation-related complications.
This Complex Prosthetics Assessment Clinic (CPAC) has also been used to identify
suitable candidates (serving and veterans) for the LIBOR-funded MOD/NHS
osseointegration surgical pilot. After surgery all these patients (including veterans)
are rehabilitated at the DMRC. We are also currently exploring options for a limited
expansion of the CPAC eligibility criteria to include those non-amputee patients that
have been fitted with medical devices such as offload braces.
Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator: Accountability
Douglas Chapman: [250491]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reason his Department changed its
policy towards the publication of Annual Reports from the Defence Nuclear Safety
Regulator since its last publication in 2014-15.
Douglas Chapman: [250492]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the
adequacy of transparency in the regulation of nuclear safety.
Douglas Chapman: [250493]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps she is taking to increase the
transparency of the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.
Stuart Andrew:
We have taken the step to not publish the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator's
Annual Assurance Reports as it has been assessed to do so would impact national
security. This step has not prevented the effective management and independent
assessment of the Defence Nuclear Programme being reported to Ministers, nor has
it prevented its duty holders being held to account, but we cannot accept any
compromise of our capabilities in the current security climate.
The Government recognises that there is legitimate interest in nuclear safety, but we
would not publish information that could be exploited by potential adversaries,
compromising our national security. Overall, the Defence Nuclear Programme
achieves the required standards of nuclear and radiological safety. The safety of the
public, our submarine crews, the defence workforce and the protection of the
environment remain the Department's priority.
Defence: Procurement
Grahame Morris: [252024]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 11 April 2019 to
Question 241023 on Defence: Procurement, if his Department will identify UK domestic
manufacturers of specialised military cabling that meet the standards required.
Stuart Andrew:
Most of our cabling requirements are likely to be sourced by our prime contractors
and there is therefore no need for the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to hold a list of
potential suppliers. When a requirement for cabling is identified the MOD will procure,
wherever possible, through open competition, assessing the tenders to ensure they
meet the standards required before awarding any contract.
We remain satisfied that our supplier base can continue to manufacture the cables
needed for our current defence programmes.
Devonport Dockyard: Trident Submarines
Jonathan Edwards: [250778]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate her Department has made of
the cost to the public purse of upgrading docks at Devonport as part of the UK nuclear
programme.
Stuart Andrew:
The Ministry of Defence continues to undertake work to define the future
infrastructure requirements at Devonport to deliver the submarine programme safely
and securely. We are currently conducting negotiations with industry partners.
DMRC Headley Court: Veterans
Nicky Morgan: [251256]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many veterans have been granted access
to the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre through the Veterans Prosthetic Panel in
the last 12 months.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
Twelve veteran patients have been seen at the Defence Medical Rehabilitation
Centre in the last calendar year.
Nicky Morgan: [251257]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many veterans were granted access to
Headley Court in each of the last 10 years.
Mark Lancaster:
Since 2016, veterans with amputation-related complications can be referred by the
NHS to the Complex Prosthetics Assessment Clinic (CPAC) at the Defence Medical
Rehabilitation Centre, which relocated from Headley Court to the Stanford Hall
Rehabilitation Estate in 2018. To date, 41 patients have been seen at the CPAC
since it began. A breakdown of patients by year is not available.
Nicky Morgan: [251258]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many veterans requested but were
refused access to Headley Court in each of the last ten years.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
Veteran referrals and requests for DMRC treatment can be received in many different
ways, for which there is no central record. Consequently, an answer to this question
cannot be provided.
EU Defence Policy
Andrew Rosindell: [251960]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what her Department's policy is on the
integration of European armed forces plan; and if she will make a statement.
Mark Lancaster:
The Government is not aware of an integration of European armed forces plan. The
UK supports increased cooperation and interoperability between armed forces,
including at European level, for example through joint exercises and development of
defence capabilities. Such cooperation must be complementary with NATO, the
cornerstone of our defence.
Heavy Equipment Transporters: Location
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251192]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the current location of the Heavy
Equipment Transporters.
Mark Lancaster:
The Army has a fleet of 91 Heavy Equipment Transporters. They are operated by
military personnel of 19 Tank Transporter Squadron, Royal Logistic Corps, with our
commercial partners and are based in Bulford.
The fleet is currently operating in the UK and Europe in support of UK and allied
operations and exercises. We do not routinely comment on specific locations for
individual capabilities as to do so would compromise operational security or would be
likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces
Iceland: Military Aid
Andrew Rosindell: [249867]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans he has to provide military support
to Iceland in the next 12 months.
Mark Lancaster:
The UK will contribute four Typhoon aircraft to NATO Air Policing in Iceland for the
first time in late 2019. In addition, the UK regularly takes part in exercises hosted by
Iceland and we plan to participate in Exercise Dynamic Mongoose 19 (NATO Anti-
Submarine Warfare (ASW) exercise) and Exercise Northern Challenge 19 (NATO
Bomb Disposal exercise).
International Military Services: Debts
Tulip Siddiq: [252014]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons his Department has not
published the value of IMS Ltd.'s contingent liabilities as required by the statutory
authorities conferred by the Ordnance Factories and Military Services Bill 1984.
Stuart Andrew:
The Department set out its Statutory liability for International Military Sales on page
139 of the Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts.
Tulip Siddiq: [252015]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he plans to lay a statutory instrument
before Parliament to seek approval for any payment that results from the contingent
liabilities for IMS Ltd.
Stuart Andrew:
The Department will always comply with any statutory procedures.
Iran: International Military Services
Tulip Siddiq: [251360]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 29 April 2019 to
Question 245905 on Iran: International Military Services, what the exact date in May 2019
is for the scheduled enforcement hearing for the court case between IMS Ltd and the
Iranian Government on outstanding IMS debt.
Stuart Andrew:
The hearing is private and confidential and I am not at liberty to disclose the date.
Ministry of Defence: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250039]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether (a) his Department, (b) his
Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public bodies have entered
into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Stuart Andrew:
The Ministry of Defence has never entered into a contract with Emerdata Limited.
Records of Government contracts above £10,000 in central government and £25,000
in the wider public sector are published on Contracts Finder:
https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Search
Navy: Persian Gulf
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251873]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what Royal Navy assets are currently
deployed in the Persian Gulf.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251874]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what Royal Navy assets are currently
deployed in the Arctic.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251876]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what Royal Navy assets are currently
deployed in the (a) Indian Ocean and (b) South China Seas.
Mark Lancaster:
The Royal Navy currently has six surface ships deployed in the Gulf. These are HMS
BROCKLESBY, HMS LEDBURY, HMS BLYTH, HMS SHOREHAM, HMS
MONTROSE and RFA CARDIGAN BAY.
There are currently no surface ships deployed in the Arctic, Indian Ocean and South
China Sea.
The Ministry of Defence does not release details of future deployments, nor comment
on submarine operations, as to do so would, or would be likely to, prejudice the
capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.
Nuclear Weapons: Finance
Jonathan Edwards: [250771]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether anticipated reductions in spending on
the UK nuclear weapons programme from 2026 onwards are included in her
Department’s budgetary costings.
Stuart Andrew:
Yes. Forecast costs for the Defence nuclear enterprise are included in the
Department's forecast cost estimates, as published in the Equipment Plan.
Nuclear Weapons: Transport
Douglas Chapman: [250767]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many safety-related incidents that have
occurred during the transportation of nuclear weapons have resulted in the convoy
transporting those weapons temporarily halting; and what assessment she has made of
the potential environmental effect of those incidents.
Stuart Andrew:
The transportation of Defence Nuclear Material, which includes nuclear weapons, is
carried out to the highest standard in accordance with stringent safety regulations.
Any potential issue with a convoy vehicle, no matter how minor, is treated seriously
and may result in a short unscheduled stop to carry out vehicle checks to ensure that
safety is maintained.
Since 2000 there have been 57 unscheduled stops of this nature. None posed any
risk to the public, environment, or to any material being transported.
Submarines: Cost Effectiveness
Jonathan Edwards: [250779]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent changes her Department has
made to the estimated savings to be accrued from the Submarine Enterprise
Performance Programme.
Stuart Andrew:
The estimated savings to be delivered under the Submarine Enterprise Performance
Programme are included in the annual Defence Equipment Plan. The 2018 plan was
published on 18 March 2019, and can be found here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/788481/20190318-EP18_v3.pdf
Submarines: Nuclear Reactors
Jonathan Edwards: [250777]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether her Department has identified the fuel
element breach problems in the PWR2 submarine reactor design.
Stuart Andrew:
The safety of all the United Kingdom's nuclear submarines is not in doubt and
remains our highest priority.
Trident Submarines: Design
Jonathan Edwards: [250770]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if she will make an estimate of the cost to the
public purse of potential late changes to the Dreadnought submarine design.
Jonathan Edwards: [250776]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment she has made of the effect
of delays to Dreadnought submarines on the out of service date for Vanguard
submarines.
Stuart Andrew:
The design and build of the Dreadnought class submarines continues. The
programme remains on track to enter service in the early 2030s, it remains within its
budget. The build phase for the entire class will take approximately 20 years. The
Dreadnought programme will ensure the United Kingdom has a credible, independent
and capable nuclear deterrent out to the 2060s.
Trident Submarines: Repairs and Maintenance
Jonathan Edwards: [250774]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps her Department in taking to tackle
delays to the Vanguard submarine maintenance schedule.
Jonathan Edwards: [250775]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate she has made of the cost to the
public purse of delays to the Vanguard submarine maintenance schedule.
Stuart Andrew:
The Ministry of Defence is committed to working closely with Babcock to safely
deliver submarine support work, including our major planned maintenance projects.
With Babcock, we are employing robust programme management techniques to
deliver the HMS VANGUARD planned period of deep maintenance and refuel work. I
am withholding the estimated cost as its disclosure would prejudice commercial
interests.
Trident: Finance
Jonathan Edwards: [250780]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if she will publish the full-life costings of all
elements of the UK nuclear programme.
Stuart Andrew:
The Ministry of Defence does not, and has no plans to, routinely publish whole life
costs for projects, nuclear or otherwise, beyond what is already published in reports
such as the Defence Equipment Plan, Ministry of Defence Annual Report and
Accounts, and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority's Annual Report on Major
Projects.
Type 31 Frigates: Procurement
Frank Field: [251904]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the timescale is for the bidding process
for the Type 31e frigates.
Stuart Andrew:
It remains our intention to award a single Design and Build contract for five Type 31e
Frigates by the end of 2019.
USA: Middle East
Nia Griffith: [251991]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions she has had with her US
counterpart on the reported deployment of B-52 bombers to the Middle East.
Mark Lancaster:
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence has spoken with Acting US
Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan as part of her introductory calls with her
international counterparts. They discussed a range of issues of mutual interest.
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT
Business: ICT
Paul Farrelly: [251968]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his
Department has taken to ensure that businesses have the required IT infrastructure in
place to enable a paperless society.
Margot James:
The Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review (FTIR), published in July 2018, sets out
the Government’s strategy for ensuring that 15 million premises are able to connect
to full fibre by 2025, with a nationwide network established by 2033. Since the
publication of the FITR, full fibre coverage is now available to 7% of UK premises, up
from 4% around 12 months ago.
The Better Broadband Voucher Scheme, open for applications until 31st December
2019, is available to those who are unable to obtain a connection speed above
2Mbps. The Scheme can support access to satellite broadband, or fixed 4G or
wireless connections in some locations. The Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme,
launched in March 2018 as part of Local Full Fibre Networks programme, enables
small to medium sized businesses to claim a voucher worth up to £2,500, and
residents to claim a voucher worth up to £500 as part of a group project.
DCMS has convened the Digital Enterprise Delivery Group, part of the Digital Skills
Partnership, to bring together a range of industry stakeholders to improve the digital
capabilities of SMEs and charities.
BEIS’s £9 million Business Basics programme, announced as part of the UK’s
Industrial Strategy, is testing innovative ways of encouraging SMEs to take up
technology (such as accountancy or CRM software), as well as business practices
that can boost productivity. Be the Business, supported by up to £18.6m Government
funding, is a business-led independent charity that is identifying practical steps to
enable the adoption of technology and enable best-practice leadership and
management techniques.
Culture: Finance
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251910]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the
Government is taking to (a) protect and (b) increase funding for arts and culture outside
London.
Michael Ellis:
We are committed to promoting the Arts and culture outside London, and continue to
work closely with the Arts Council to ensure that the whole of the country has access
to funding for arts and cultural programmes.
Last year 70% of Arts Council's total funding was awarded outside London. Between
2018 and 2022 an additional £170 million of National Portfolio Organisation funding
will be invested outside London.
In addition, the recent Cultural Development Fund has seen £20 million of funding
shared between five towns and cities outside of the capital, while programmes such
as Creative People and Places and the City of Culture programme continue to focus
outside of the capital.
DCMS has also recently announced an additional £4 million of funding for the
DCMS/Wolfson Museums and Galleries Improvement Fund. In 2019/20, 35 museums
and galleries will benefit from this funding which aims to improve audience
experience. Over 80% of regional museums outside London will receive money from
this Fund.
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249903]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, how many civil
servants in his Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the
European Union and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three
years.
Margot James:
In the Civil Service, a ‘secondment’ is a transfer to an external organisation, whereas
the movement of staff to another Government department is usually referred to as a
loan. We do not hold information centrally on the host departments of all
secondees/loans from our department. However, we do hold a record of some
employees on loan for whom we had to retrieve salary costs over the last 3 years:
YEAR
DEPARTMENT FOR EXITING THE
EUROPEAN UNION
DEPARTMENT FOR
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
2017 2 0
2018 0 2
2019 (to present) 0 3
Internet: Security
Paul Farrelly: [251217]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his
Department is taking to ensure the security of age-verification check databases.
Margot James:
All providers of age verification (AV) services must comply with data protection laws.
In addition, ahead of the introduction of mandatory age verification on online
pornography sites, the regulator, the British Board for Film Classifcation, has created
a voluntary certification scheme, the Age-verification Certificate (AVC), which will
assess the data security standards of AV providers. Age verification solutions which
offer these robust data protection conditions will be certified following an independent
assessment and will carry the BBFC's new green 'AV' symbol. Details will also be
published on the BBFC’s age-verification website, ageverificationregulator.com.
Sports: Environment Protection
Paul Farrelly: [251219]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his
Department is taking to reduce the environmental footprint of large sporting events.
Mims Davies:
The government, along with major event partners, is committed to embedding
sustainability as a key pillar of the planning and delivery of major sporting events. We
also welcome the innovation that the sector is driving such as the degradable
seaweed pouches used at this year’s London Marathon instead of plastic water
bottles.
UK Sport is working alongside several events, providing support as they look into
environmentally friendly delivery options. The upcoming Netball World Cup is
currently undergoing an environmental review across all workstreams, with findings
not only being used to make changes to the event, but also will be fed back into the
newly formed sector working group, which alongside staff from UK Sport, consists of
athletes, venues and NGB representatives.
UK Sport is also conducting work to place a range of ethical policies at the heart of all
events delivered with government support, with environmental policies and
considerations sitting as a core element of that work.
St George's Day
Andrew Rosindell: [249965]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what estimate he has
made of the contribution of St. George's Day to England's economy.
Andrew Rosindell: [249966]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what estimate he has
made of the contribution of St. Patrick's Day to the economy of Northern Ireland.
Andrew Rosindell: [249967]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what estimate he has
made of the contribution of St. Andrew's Day to Scotland's economy.
Andrew Rosindell: [249969]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what estimate he has
made of the contribution of St. David's Day to the Welsh economy.
Michael Ellis:
The Department has made no specific estimate of the economic contributions of the
National days.
EDUCATION
Apprentices: Wolverhampton North East
Emma Reynolds: [252118]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education,how many apprenticeships have been
created in each month since the introduction of the apprenticeship levy in Wolverhampton
North East constituency.
Anne Milton:
The attached table provides figures for apprenticeship starts for each month since
May 2017, when significant structural changes to the apprenticeship funding system
were implemented following the introduction of the apprenticeship levy and
apprenticeship service.
The profile of apprenticeship starts changed significantly both in the run-up to the
introduction of the levy and subsequently. Care should be taken when comparing
individual months between academic years as they are unlikely to provide a
meaningful year-on-year trend. Numbers of reported starts are likely to change as the
reforms to apprenticeship funding continue to bed in and employers engage with the
new system.
Attachments:
1. 252118_table [252118_table.doc]
Children: Day Care
Chris Ruane: [251920]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment he has made of
level of public awareness of the 30 hours free childcare programme in each income
decile in England.
Nadhim Zahawi:
This government is committed to helping working families with accessible, affordable
childcare and offers a broad range of childcare support.
The department measures awareness via the annual Childcare and Early Years
Survey of Parents, the most recent data published as Official Statistics in December
2018: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/childcare-and-early-years-survey-of-
parents-2018.
This data will be collected in 2019 via the same survey and published as Official
Statistics in December 2019.
Table 3.1, attached, summarises awareness of the 30 hours policy among families
with children aged 0-4 years in England, broken down by various family
characteristics such as family income.
Attachments:
1. 251920 Table 3.1 [251920_Table_3.1_Awareness_of_the_30_hours_offer.docx]
Educational Exchanges
Chi Onwurah: [252098]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, which Minister in his Department has
responsibility for promoting international exchange in British schools and at national,
regional and local level.
Nick Gibb:
The Department works closely with the British Council, who play an important role in
promoting exchange opportunities to schools and helping them to find partners.
In January, my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education announced a
new £2.5 million programme to provide more opportunities for young people,
particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, to take part in an international
school exchange. More information about the programme is available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/25-million-to-boost-international-exchanges-for-
schools.
Erasmus+ Programme
Helen Hayes: [252019]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when he will be able to confirm whether the
UK is going to seek association to the next Erasmus+ programme that will run from 2021;
and what recent assessment he has made of the benefits to widening participation for
outward student mobility of that programme.
Chris Skidmore:
The government firmly believes that the UK and European countries should continue
to give young people and students the chance to benefit from each other’s world-
leading universities following our exit from the European Union.
The next generation of EU programmes is currently being discussed in the EU. This
includes the proposed regulation for the 2021-27 Erasmus+ programme, which has
reached a partial general approach in the Council of the European Union.
Improving social mobility is a priority for this government and we want everyone to
have the opportunity to succeed, regardless of their background or where they grew
up. For this reason, the government welcomes the aim of the Commission’s proposal
to make the next programme more accessible to participants, particularly those from
disadvantaged backgrounds.
We will continue to participate in discussions on the draft regulation while we remain
an EU Member State and are considering options for future participation in the next
Erasmus+ programme. Of course, the text of the regulation has not been finalised,
including important aspects such as the terms of third-country participation, and we
will need to consider the regulation as a whole.
Ultimately, any decisions about our participation in the Erasmus+ programme will
also be a matter for wider negotiations about our future relationship with the EU.
Fossil Fuels: Universities
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251208]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps the Government is taking to
encourage universities to divest from global coal, oil and gas companies.
Chris Skidmore:
Universities are autonomous from the government, so we do not specifically
encourage them to divest from global coal, oil and gas companies.
The government is committed to supporting the effective management of climate-
related financial risks, and we have endorsed the recommendations of the Task
Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
Free School Meals
Frank Field: [251926]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will make an assessment of the
potential merits of rolling over any unspent funds on the cards of children entitled to free
school meals, at the end of each week, so that they can be used the following week.
Nadhim Zahawi:
Free school meals (FSM) are intended as a benefit in kind, rather than a cash benefit,
and our primary interest is that schools meet their legal duties to provide nutritious
free lunches to eligible children.
We trust school leaders to make the best decisions in the interests of their pupils and
it is right that they have flexibility around how they deliver FSM.
We are, of course, very keen to ensure that all eligible children receive their full
entitlement to FSM. We are also interested to hear about new and creative steps
schools are taking to support eligible children. It is important that children are
claiming their free lunch each day and that schools and colleges operating this
system to avoid any risk of children building up significant cash reserves on their
accounts or regularly spending their allowances at other times of the day without
receiving a healthy lunch.
We would not wish to instruct schools to do any specific approach nationally.
However, we will consider how we can share the very best practice around FSM.
Tracy Brabin: [252120]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what proportion of disadvantaged children
will not benefit from the funding for free school meals and activities during the summer
break announced on 8 May 2019.
Nadhim Zahawi:
We do not know the number of children that will not benefit from the funding for free
school meals (FSM) and activities during the 2019 summer holidays. This would
depend on how many children in the funded areas choose to take up the offer of free
holiday provision.
Our 2019 programme will take place in 11 local authority areas. It will enable us to
test the effectiveness of a model of local coordination of free holiday club provision.
We are carrying out an independent evaluation of this programme and will publish the
results of this, including information on attendance.
Free School Meals: Barnsley
Stephanie Peacock: [252033]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much of the funding announced to
provide free meals and activities over the 2019 summer holidays will be provided to
Barnsley.
Nadhim Zahawi:
As there were no applications for funding from any organisations to deliver the
programme in Barnsley this summer, Barnsley will not receive any funding from the
2019 Holiday Activities and Food programme.
Institutes of Technology
Stephanie Peacock: [252049]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether there will be a competition for
further Institutes of Technology as part of his Department's plan to review Institute of
Technology cold spots.
Anne Milton:
We have always acknowledged that there might be some parts of the country where
there were no proposals that met our quality standard in this competition. We will
review the extent of geographical ‘cold spots’ in provision for Institutes of Technology
to determine whether a future competition should be considered.
Marriage Guidance: Finance
Fiona Bruce: [251264]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much funding for grants for purposes
set out in section 22 of the Family Law Act 1996 has been allocated in each financial year
since 2010.
Nick Gibb:
The information requested is not held centrally. The Department for Work and
Pensions is responsible for relationship support.
Pupil Exclusions
Angela Rayner: [251434]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to his Statement of 7 May
2019 on the Timpson review of school exclusions, if it is his policy to make schools
accountable for pupils who leave their rolls only through permanent exclusions.
Angela Rayner: [251435]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to his Statement of 7 May
2019 on the Timpson review of school exclusions, whether his consultation on making
schools accountable for the outcomes of pupils that they exclude will include
accountability for pupils who leave school rolls other than by permanent exclusion.
Angela Rayner: [251436]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to Ofsted’s report entitled
Safeguarding children and young people in education from knife crime published in
March 2019, if he will extend the requirement for schools to collect data on permanent
and fixed-term exclusions to require schools to collect data on managed moves.
Angela Rayner: [251437]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to his Statement of 7 May
2019 on the Timpson review of school exclusions, what sanctions (a) are currently in
place and (b) will be put in place where schools or multi-academy trusts are found to
have off-rolled pupils.
Angela Rayner: [251438]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to his Statement of 7 May
2019 on the Timpson review of school exclusions, whether his commitment to
establishing a practice programme to drive better partnership will include requiring multi-
academy trusts to work with local authorities.
Nick Gibb:
As noted in the Government response to Edward Timpson’s review of school
exclusion, the Government will make schools accountable for the outcomes of
permanently excluded children. Over the summer, the Department will work with
education leaders to design a consultation, to be launched in the autumn, on how to
deliver these reforms in practice. Among other things, the Department will seek views
on how to mitigate the potential unintended consequences Edward Timpson has
identified in his review, including how to tackle the practice of ‘off-rolling’.
Ofsted already considers records of children taken off roll and has recently consulted
on proposals that will see a strengthened focus on this issue, and has proposed that
where inspectors find off-rolling, this will always be addressed in the inspection
report, and where appropriate will lead to a school’s leadership being judged
inadequate. Ofsted will publish the outcome of its consultation soon.
As in the Education (Pupil Registration) (England) regulations 2006 as amended,
state schools must notify the local authority when a pupil’s name is to be deleted from
the admission register as soon as the ground for deletion under regulation 8 in
relation to that pupil is established. The Department will provide guidance on the use
of ‘managed moves’, as recommended by Edward Timpson.
The Government will also establish a practice programme that embeds effective
partnership working between local authorities, schools, alternative provision and
other partners to better equip schools to intervene early for children at risk of
exclusion and to ensure that the most effective provision is put in place for those who
are excluded. As a large proportion of schools are academies, the programme will
support partnership working between local authorities and academies.
Angela Rayner: [252039]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, by what date he plans to conclude the
consultation on how to make schools accountable for the outcomes of permanently
excluded children.
Nick Gibb:
The Government is committed to making schools accountable for pupils who are
permanently excluded. As stated in the review of school exclusion led by Edward
Timpson, this will require careful design. The Department will work with education
leaders over the summer to design a consultation on how to deliver this in practice,
including seeking views on how to mitigate the potential unintended consequences
that are identified in that review. The consultation will be launched in the autumn and
will comply with the Government’s published consultation principles.
Angela Rayner: [252040]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he Is taking to minimise waiting
times for permanently excluded pupils to be found a new school place.
Nick Gibb:
The Government’s response to Edward Timpson’s review of school exclusion sets
out our commitment to ensure that pupils who have been excluded from school
continue to benefit from high-quality education.
There are already duties in place to ensure children who are excluded from school
are in education from the sixth day of their exclusion. The education provided must
be full-time, or as close to full-time, if full-time would not be in a child’s best interests
because of his or her health needs.
Statutory guidance is also clear that schools should help to minimise the disruption
that exclusion can cause to an excluded pupil’s education including considering
starting alternative provision as soon as possible after the exclusion. In the case of a
looked after child, the school and the local authority should work together to arrange
alternative provision from the first day following the exclusion. Where it is not
possible, or not appropriate, to arrange alternative provision during the first five
school days of an exclusion, the school should take reasonable steps to set and mark
work for the pupil.
Fair access protocols exist to ensure that, outside the normal admissions round,
unplaced children, especially the hardest to place and most vulnerable, are offered a
place at a suitable school as quickly as possible. However, the Department is aware
there can be delays in the in-year admission of such children. As such, the
Department is currently considering improvements to the in-year admission process,
including Fair Access Protocols, to ensure that all children, especially the most
vulnerable, can access a new school place as quickly as possible.
Angela Rayner: [252042]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to his oral statement of 7 May
2019 on the Timpson Review of school exclusions, Official Report column 479, what
steps he plans to take to reduce off-rolling before the start of the next school year.
Nick Gibb:
The Department is clear that off-rolling is unacceptable, and while it believes this
practice is relatively rare, the Government is committed to continue to work with
Ofsted to define and tackle the practice of off-rolling.
Ofsted already considers records of children taken off roll and has recently consulted
on proposals that will see a strengthened focus on this issue. It has proposed that
where inspectors find off-rolling, this will always be addressed in the inspection
report, and where appropriate will lead to a school’s leadership being judged
inadequate. Ofsted will publish the outcome of its consultation soon.
In response to Edward Timpson’s review of school exclusion, the Department has
committed to working with education leaders over the summer to design a
consultation on making schools accountable for the outcomes for permanently
excluded children, to be launched in the autumn. Among other things, the
Department will seek views on how to mitigate the potential unintended
consequences Edward Timpson has identified in his review, including how to tackle
the practice of off-rolling.
Schools: Local Government Services
Paul Farrelly: [251957]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what discussions he has had with the
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on improving schools' access to local authority
support for pupils and families that need it.
Nadhim Zahawi:
My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education meets regularly with
Cabinet colleagues to discuss the Department for Education agenda.
Social Services: Northamptonshire
Lucy Powell: [252080]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what reports he has received from the
children's services commissioner on progress in improving children's services in
Northamptonshire in the last five years.
Nadhim Zahawi:
Malcolm Newsam CBE was appointed as Commissioner for Children’s Services in
Northamptonshire on 30 November 2018. He has submitted one report to date. This
will be published shortly.
Speech and Language Disorders: Training
Geraint Davies: [250422]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans he has to ensure that staff
working in an education setting are trained in awareness of speech, language and
communication needs.
Nick Gibb:
The Department is investing £50 million to develop more high quality school-based
nursery provision for disadvantaged children, £26 million to set up a network of
English hubs, and £20 million to provide school-led professional development for
early years practitioners.
The Department is reviewing the current special educational needs and disability
(SEND) content in Initial Teacher Training (ITT) provision and building on our existing
SEND specialist qualifications to develop a continuum of career development from
ITT, through teachers’ early careers and into specialist and leadership roles.
Since the introduction of the 2014 SEND reforms, the Department has provided
funding to a range of condition-specific organisations to develop resources and
training to deliver high quality teaching across all types of SEND. This includes
specialist resources in relation to speech, language and communication skills.
The Department currently funding nasen and University College London, on behalf of
the Whole School SEND consortium, to deliver a programme of work that will equip
the workforce to deliver high quality teaching across all types of special educational
needs. New SEND regional leads will bring together practitioners and networks in
their local area to build a Community of Practice, including local speech, language
and communications champions.
Students: Loans
Paul Blomfield: [251396]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what progress his Department has made on
the introduction of sharia-compliant student loans.
Chris Skidmore:
The government remains committed to introducing an Alternative Student Finance
product. Details on implementation will follow the Review of Post-18 Education and
Funding which will conclude this year.
Teachers: Training
Chi Onwurah: [252097]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether a training budget is available to
teachers.
Nick Gibb:
The Department knows that continuing professional development (CPD) is integral to
improving the quality of teaching. Effective, evidence-based CPD strengthens
practice, builds confidence and, crucially, improves outcomes for pupils.
For CPD to be effective, however, it must be tailored to the needs of the individual.
That is why decisions relating to CPD, including budgets, rightly rest with schools,
headteachers and teachers.
The Department recognises that more can be done to improve the take-up of high
quality evidence-based CPD in schools. That is why the CPD Expert Group has re-
convened to develop recommendations that ensure that all teachers have access to
high quality, meaningful support and CPD, drawing on the Standard for Teachers’
Professional Development (published in July 2016) and the accompanying
implementation guide.
Tiffin-Brown, Dylan
Lucy Powell: [252078]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when the report of the Serious Case Review
into the death of Dylan Tiffin-Brown is due to be published.
Lucy Powell: [252079]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will ensure that in compiling its report
the Serious Case Review Panel reviewing the death of Dylan Tiffin Brown in Northampton
will interview family and community members as set out in the guidance for serious case
reviews.
Nadhim Zahawi:
Publication and timings of serious case reviews rest with the relevant local
safeguarding children board. The department cannot comment on specific serious
case reviews until after publication.
The statutory guidance, ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children, 2015’ sets out the
purpose of serious case reviews and the process to be followed. Decisions on the
scope and methodology rest with the relevant local safeguarding children board
(LSCB) and I expect Northamptonshire’s LSCB, like all others, to reflect our guidance
in any review.
Universities
Chi Onwurah: [252099]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many university courses have a
mandatory international semester.
Chris Skidmore:
The information requested is not held centrally.
Universities are autonomous institutions and responsible for deciding their own
course structures and content, including whether periods of international study are
required.
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
Agriculture: Diversification
Paul Farrelly: [251236]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps the
Government is taking to support farmers to create a sustainable diversified farming
system.
Mr Robert Goodwill:
The Agriculture Bill will help farmers in England to grow strong and diversified
businesses producing high quality food in a more sustainable way, enhancing the
environment for future generations. We will create an ambitious new system based
on paying “public money for public goods”, which will include improving air and water
quality, biodiversity and habitats for wildlife. Financial support for innovations like
precision farming can also help farmers become more productive, reduce the use of
expensive chemicals and protect the environment.
Birds: Pest Control
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249811]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what processes
his Department has put in place for the issue of new general licences for avian pest
control.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249812]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when he plans to
issue General Licences for avian pest control.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The Secretary of State has taken over ultimate decision making powers for general
licences relating to the purposes covered by the three revoked general licences. The
Secretary of State will consider the present situation with intensity and urgency; his
priority is getting this right. The Government has issued a call for evidence
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/defra-launches-call-for-evidence-on-decision-
to-revoke-general-licences to help our consideration of the issues of new general
licences.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249907]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many civil
servants in his Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the
European Union and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three
years.
David Rutley:
Between June 2016 and March 2018 a total of 11 civil servants have been loaned to
the Department for Exiting the European Union and the Department for International
Trade. These staff were loaned on two year contracts, some of which have already
come to an end. All the outstanding DExEU loans are due to end in 2018/19, with the
DIT loans due to end in 2020/21.
Civil servants are loaned between other Government departments rather than
seconded.
Both departments were only formed in July 2016, therefore there is no data prior to
this date.
Diesel Engines: Urban Areas
Paul Farrelly: [251945]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he plans
to limit the use of diesel generators in town centres.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The Government currently regulates the use of generators with a thermal input of
over 1 megawatt in order to minimise the negative impact on air quality, in particular
nitrogen oxide emissions.
The Clean Air Strategy, published earlier this year, recognises the scope for
potentially tighter controls in the future, both in terms of size of generator and level of
emissions. It also commits to exploring the use of environmental permitting for
significant non-road mobile machinery sources where appropriate, including
generators.
Electronic Training Aids
Nic Dakin: [249947]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when his
Department plans to bring forward legislation to ban the use of electronic shock collars.
David Rutley:
The Government will introduce the necessary legislation in due course.
Food: Packaging
Ian Murray: [251953]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his
Department is taking to encourage major supermarket chains to stop using plastic
packaging for fruit and vegetables.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations already require all retailers to
ensure that all their packaging does not exceed what is needed to make sure the
products are safe, hygienic and acceptable for both the packed product and for the
consumer. As part of the Resources and Waste Strategy, we have committed to
review the effectiveness of these regulations by the end of next year.
We are also consulting on reforms to the way we manage packaging waste. We have
set out in our consultation options for how we want to enhance the incentive for
producers to make better packaging design choices.
Plastic packaging for some fruit and vegetables can extend their shelf life, which can
help to reduce food waste.
Grouse Moors
Paul Farrelly: [250793]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the cost to
the public purse is of subsidies for grouse moor management; and what assessment he
has made of the effect of those subsidies on the economy.
Mr Robert Goodwill:
The Government does not make subsidies available specifically for grouse moor
management, although such land may qualify for Basic Payment Scheme payments
and environmental schemes.
Hares Preservation Act 1892
George Eustice: [251294]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the current
maximum penalty is for a breach of the Hares Preservation Act 1892.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The current maximum penalty for a breach of the Hares Preservation Act 1892 is
level 1 on the standard scale, i.e. £200.
Hedges and Ditches
Mr Laurence Robertson: [251892]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is
taking to protect hedgerows as habitats for wildlife; and if he will make a statement.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Hornsey and Wood
Green, Catherine West, on 15 April 2019 to PQ 242911.
Pheasants: Imports
Kerry McCarthy: [251253]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many
pheasant (a) eggs for hatching and (b) live birds were imported into England from each
(a) EU and (b) third country in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
Kerry McCarthy: [251254]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many
partridge (a) eggs for hatching and (b) live birds were imported into England from each
(a) EU country and (b) third country in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
David Rutley:
The number of pheasant hatching eggs and live birds imported into England from the
EU between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2019 was:
SPECIES COMMODITY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN TOTAL
Partridge Live Birds France 1,722,269
Spain 465,168
Partridge Total 2,187,437
Pheasant Hatching Eggs France 17,627,250
Poland 1,241,460
Portugal 142,630
Spain 767,260
Live Birds Belgium 12,000
France 5,382,706
Ireland 1,000
Pheasant Total 25,174,306
The number of pheasant hatching eggs and live birds imported into the UK from third
countries between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2019 was:
Hatching eggs – 54,600
Live birds – 5,250
All imports were from the USA.
There are no recorded figures for partridge hatching eggs imported from the EU. In
addition, there were no imports of partridge live birds or hatching eggs from third
countries.
The Animal and Plant Health Agency is not able to determine how many of the above
imports from third countries were imported into England.
Solid Fuels: Prices
Frank Field: [250755]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions
he has had with retailers on all solid fuel prices across England as part of his
Department’s consultation on cleaner domestic burning of solid fuels and wood; and if he
will make a statement.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
During the consultation period various respondents sent in their own price analyses.
These note that there are price differentials associated with volumes purchased and
seasonality as well as between differing locations across England. We are taking this
information into account as we develop our analysis.
Frank Field: [250756]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what consultation
his Department has undertaken with the Competition and Markets Authority regarding
competition in the solid fuel market in England as part of his Department’s consultation on
cleaner domestic burning of solid fuels and wood; and if he will make a statement.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
Defra has not held discussions with the Competition and Markets Authority as part of
its consultation on cleaner domestic burning of solid fuels and wood.
FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE
Afghanistan: Sikhs
John Spellar: [251206]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment
his Department has made of the level of threat to the Sikh community in Afghanistan.
Mark Field:
Security remains an ongoing challenge in Afghanistan. The Afghan National Defence
and Security Forces are committed to tackling this threat. As part of NATO's Resolute
Support Mission, the UK supports the Afghan National Defence and Security Forces
in its efforts to improve security for all communities.
Ethnic and religious minorities in Afghanistan, including the Christian, Sikh and Hindu
communities, continue to face challenges. We regularly raise human rights issues
with the Government of Afghanistan, including the need to protect the rights of all
ethnic and religious groups in line with the constitution. The UK condemns in the
strongest possible terms the targeting of innocent people based on their beliefs. Last
year, I publicly condemned the 1 July attack on a group of Sikhs and Hindus in
Jalalabad as "a despicable attack on Afghanistan's historic Sikh and Hindu
community".
Arctic: China and Russia
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251875]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
discussions he has had with his (a) Russian and (b) Chinese counterparts on the Arctic.
Sir Alan Duncan:
Officials from our Embassy Moscow discussed the importance of continued
international cooperation in the Arctic with the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on
6 May. A Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) official also attended the Fifth
International Arctic Forum in St Petersburg on 9 April. The Head of Polar Regions
Department, in the FCO, attended the recent Arctic Council Ministerial meeting in
Rovaniemi, Finland and spoke with the Head of the Chinese Delegation on the
margins. Officials from the British Consulate-General in Shanghai will attend the
Arctic Circle Forum on 10-11 May in Shanghai to further understand China's interest
in the region.
Cameroon: Human Rights
Hilary Benn: [251239]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
assessment he has made of the political and human rights situation in Cameroon; and if
he will make a statement.
Hilary Benn: [251243]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
assessment he has made of the political and humanitarian situation in Cameroon; and if
he will make a statement.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK continues to be deeply concerned at the worsening humanitarian situation in
the North-West and South-West (Anglophone) regions of Cameroon and the reports
of human rights violations and abuses committed by both security forces and
separatists. Violence is driving people from their homes, and impacting on the lives of
ordinary civilians, particularly women and children. The UK is providing lifesaving
assistance to 10,000 people in the Anglophone regions following a £2.5m contribution
to UNICEF in December.
The British Government regularly raises concerns about the political, human rights,
and humanitarian situation with the Government of Cameroon. Further to a phone call
in March with Cameroon Prime Minister, Joseph Ngute, on 30 April, I met with the
Cameroon High Commissioner to London to reiterate UK concerns. We discussed
the plight of the 530,000 people who have been internally displaced within the
Anglophone regions, the 32,000 refugees in Nigeria who have fled from the crisis,
and the arrest and detention of Opposition Leader, Maurice Kamto and other political
actors. I urged the Government of Cameroon to urgently take steps to establish a
credible dialogue to tackle the root causes of the crisis in the Anglophone regions,
and ensure fair and timely trial, or release, of detainees. The UK continues to call for
unhindered humanitarian access to affected populations, and investigations into all
reports of human rights violations and abuses. The UK and Austria delivered a joint
statement with support from 37 countries on the deteriorating situation in Cameroon
at the UN Human Rights Council in March, demonstrating the increasing concerns of
the wider international community.
Civil Servants: Training
Lyn Brown: [251281]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment
he has made of the potential merits of increased religious literacy across the Civil
Service.
Mark Field:
The Government has long held the view that religion plays an important role in the
political and social life in many countries throughout the world. The FCO provides a
wide range of resources, including though the Diplomatic Academy, to ensure that
staff, including those across Whitehall working in our overseas posts, understand the
influence that faith can have on foreign policy, and on their specific jobs.
Colombia: Human Rights
Jo Stevens: [252050]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
assessment his Department has made of the risks to human rights defenders in
Colombia.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The situation facing human rights defenders in Colombia is concerning: over the past
year they have faced increasing levels of threats, intimidation and killings. We
regularly express our concern over this issue to the Colombian government. On 9
May the Minister of State for the Commonwealth and the UN, Lord Ahmad of
Wimbledon met with Colombian High Counsellor for Stabilisation, Emilio Archila, and
directly raised the issue. Our Embassy in Bogotá funds human rights programmes
that help human rights defenders, and we work closely with civil society groups to
bring individual cases to the Colombian government’s attention.
Hamed bin Haydara
Dr David Drew: [251900]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make
representations at the appeal hearing in the case of Hamed bin Haydara, a Yemeni
member of the Baha’i faith sentenced to death by a Houthi court in Sana’a in January
2018, scheduled for 16 June; and if he will make a statement.
Dr Andrew Murrison:
We strongly condemn Mr bin Haydara's death sentence and the continued
persecution of Baha'is in Yemen for their religious beliefs. We continue to follow the
treatment of the Baha’is in Yemen closely, including through meeting their
representatives in the UK and lobbying the relevant authorities. We continue to call
on the parties to the conflict to respect the human rights of all Yemenis.
Iran: Foreign Relations
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251188]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
assessment he has made of UK relations with Iran; and if he will make a statement.
Dr Andrew Murrison:
The UK’s relationship with Iran is complex and based on a long history. Maintaining a
bilateral relationship with Iran provides an opportunity to hold discussions on a range
of issues, including our consular cases, human rights and Iran’s role in the region.
We do not agree on everything, and there are many areas in which we have real
concerns, but through dialogue we seek to influence Iran’s views on the subject that
matter to the UK. I have no plans to make a statement at this time.
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe
Tulip Siddiq: [252012]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what steps he
plans to take following the decision for Iranian judges to reopen the second court case
against Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe.
Dr Andrew Murrison:
We have never seen the charges against Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe and are deeply
concerned about reports that she faces a further charge. We continue to raise all our
dual nationals detained in Iran with the Iranian Government at every opportunity, and
make decisions in line with what we believe will produce the best outcomes in their
cases. However, we will not be providing a continuous commentary. We judge this
will not be helpful, or in the best interest of each case.
Tulip Siddiq: [252013]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what steps his
Department is taking to ensure that its recent granting of diplomatic protection for
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe is effective.
Dr Andrew Murrison:
Diplomatic protection does not automatically dictate any particular course of action.
We continue to make further diplomatic representations to the Iranian authorities
privately and are continually reviewing what further steps are available to us to help
secure the Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe's release. We will continue to make decisions in line
with what we believe is in her best interests.
North Korea: Christianity
Lyn Brown: [251291]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
assessment he has made of trends in the level of repression of Christians in North Korea.
Mark Field:
The UK continues to have grave concerns over the repression of Christians in North
Korea. The Bishop of Truro’s interim report as part of his independent review into
Christian persecution cites a number of reports on the different forms of persecution
faced by North Koreans who seek to practise Christianity outside of state-controlled
organisations. There is nothing to indicate the situation is getting better. We raised
the lack of freedom of religious belief with the North Korean authorities during their
Universal Periodic Review on 9 May. We will continue working with our international
partners in the Human Rights Council and elsewhere to hold the North Korean
government to account. We continue to urge North Korea to engage positively with
the international community on this issue, including through our Embassy in
Pyongyang.
Religious Freedom
Lyn Brown: [251282]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make an
assessment of the merits of extending the remit of the review of religious persecution led
by the Bishop of Truro to (a) the Department for International Development, (b) the
Department for International Trade, (c) the Home Office, (d) the Cabinet Office and (e)
the National Security Office.
Mark Field:
The Review was commissioned by the Foreign Secretary into the work of the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office, so it would be inappropriate for it to review, or make
recommendations for, other departments. However, other government departments
may wish to take note of the Review report and its findings.
St Helena: Fisheries
Zac Goldsmith: [251369]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will publish the
price for which the Saint Helena Government sold commercial fishing licences to the
Argos Fishing Company in (a) 2016, (b) 2017 and (c) 2018.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The sale of commercial fishing licenses is the responsibility of the St Helena
Government.
Zac Goldsmith: [251370]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will publish the
(a) permitted geographic catch locations and (b) permitted species and catch volumes
under licenses sold by the Saint Helena Government to the Argos Fishing Company in (i)
2016, (ii) 2017 and (iii) 2018.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The sale of commercial fishing licenses is the responsibility of the St Helena
Government.
Zac Goldsmith: [251372]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will publish the
level of subsidy paid to the Saint Helena Fisheries Corporation from the UK public purse
in the years (a) 2016, (b) 2017 and (c) 2018.
Sir Alan Duncan:
Any financial support to the St Helena Fishery Corporation is determined by the St
Helena Government.
Zac Goldsmith: [251373]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what the terms and
conditions are under which fishing licenses are sold by the Saint Helena Government;
how conditions on those licences are enforced by the Saint Helena Government; and if
he will make a statement.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The St Helena Government are responsible for selling and administering commercial
fishing licences.
St Helena: Fishing Vessels
Zac Goldsmith: [251371]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will publish the
income from fishing vessel registration fees paid to the Saint Helena Government by the
Argos Fishing Company in the years (a) 2016, (b) 2017 and (c) 2018.
Sir Alan Duncan:
Any commercial agreements between Argos Fishing company and the St Helena
Government are a matter for the St Helena Government.
Yemen: Capital Punishment
Dr David Drew: [251902]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what
representations he has made to the Houthi regime in Yemen on the use of the death
penalty; and if he will make a statement.
Dr Andrew Murrison:
The British Government opposes the death penalty in all circumstances and in every
country, including Yemen. We regularly raise human rights concerns at the highest
levels with the Houthi regime.
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
Asthma: Air Pollution
Stephen Morgan: [251378]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of the recent trends in air quality on the well being of people with a diagnosis of asthma
across the UK.
Seema Kennedy:
Short-term peaks of air pollution are associated with a range of adverse health effects
including exacerbation of asthma.
Public Health England (PHE) has not made any specific assessment of the impact of
air pollution on the well-being of people with asthma diagnosis, across the United
Kingdom.
PHE is continuously developing and reviewing the evidence on the health effects of
air pollution, to help reduce the health burden attributable to air pollution in England,
for the general population and vulnerable groups, including those suffering from
asthma. Examples of this can be seen at the following links:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-air-pollution/health-
matters-air-pollution
https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/committee-on-the-medical-effects-of-air-
pollutants-comeap
PHE will start a project in September 2019 to examine any associations in seasonal
variation of fungal spores with asthma incidence that may also consider pollution
levels.
Asthma: Medical Treatments
Stephen Morgan: [251379]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to ensure that people with a diagnosis of asthma have access to the medication
required to deal with that condition.
Seema Kennedy:
As set out in the Long Term Plan, pharmacists in primary care networks will
undertake a range of medicine reviews for asthma patients, including – patient
education on inhaler use; encouraging uptake of dry powder inhalers where clinically
appropriate; and the uptake of new smart inhalers and other treatments as clinically
indicated.
Autism: Diagnosis
Dr Paul Williams: [252022]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the oral
contribution of the Minister for Care of 8 May 2019, Official Report, column 432, when the
data on autism diagnosis waiting times will be published.
Caroline Dinenage:
The Department is determined to drive up performance on autism diagnosis
nationally. To support this NHS Digital began formally collecting autism diagnosis
waiting time data from mental health provider trusts for the first time through the
Mental Health Services Data set in April 2018. Data is submitted on behalf of autism
diagnostic services, in line with issued guidance. We expect to publish a report after a
year’s data has been collected and analysed, this autumn. As this is the first time this
data is being submitted some work to improve its quality may be necessary.
Blood: Contamination
Frank Field: [249855]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what new medical checks his
Department has put in place to ensure that no NHS blood supplies are contaminated.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The National Health Service blood supply chain has rigorous safety standards
making the United Kingdom blood supply one of the safest in the world. Every donor
completes an extensive donor health check questionnaire before each donation. This
is designed to identify donors who have a recognisable risk of infection who can then
be excluded or subject to further testing. Those considered at risk are asked to defer
donation until it is safe for them to do so.
All blood donations are routinely tested for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, hepatitis E, HIV,
syphilis and for first time donors, human T-lymphotropic virus, before they are sent to
hospitals and released into the supply chain. If any blood donation tests positive for
infection it is not released into the blood supply chain.
NHS Blood and Transplant and the other UK blood services are subject to regular
inspections by independent regulators and NHS Blood and Transplant safety policy is
formulated by two independent advisory committees; the Joint United Kingdom Blood
Transfusion Services Professional Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee
on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs. NHS Blood and Transplant, along with
the other UK Blood Services, established a UK blood supply surveillance scheme
where all hospitals in the UK report, as a condition of their registration, any
recognised or unexpected reactions to blood products. This allows constant vigilance
to any possible threat to the safety of the blood supply.
Blood: Viral Diseases
Sir Peter Bottomley: [249818]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his
Department has made of the potential merits of trialling opt-out testing for (a) hepatitis C,
(b) HIV and (c) other blood-borne viruses in emergency care settings.
Seema Kennedy:
NHS England specialised commissioning does not run a national programme of opt-
out screening within emergency care settings. NHS England is aware of some
hospital trusts that have implemented an opt-out screening protocol within emergency
care settings, but this is not routine practice in all hospitals. Where opt-out is
implemented there are posters on display advising patients, attending the emergency
department, that they will be tested unless they tell their attending clinician that they
want to opt-out and do not wish to be tested.
Opportunistic testing for blood-borne diseases may also occur in non-traditional
healthcare settings frequently used by people who inject drugs (or used to), such as
doctors’ surgeries, community pharmacies, prisons and sexual health centres.
Cannabis: Medical Treatments
Jo Stevens: [251364]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 24
April 2019 to Question 244142 on Cannabis: Medical Treatments, whether his
Department defines Naboline as a cannabis imitating rather than cannabis derived
product.
Jo Stevens: [251366]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 24
April 2019 to Question 244142 on Cannabis: Medical Treatments, when (a) Naboline and
(b) Savitex were first made available to prescribe on the NHS.
Seema Kennedy:
The Department recognises both Nabilone and Sativex as licensed cannabis-based
medicines. Neither, however, falls within the scope of the definition of a ‘cannabis-
based product for medicinal use’ under the recent change to the law.
Nabilone is a synthetic non-natural cannabinoid that mimics delta-9-
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). It was issued a marketing authorisation by the
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), for nausea and
vomiting caused by chemotherapy in patients who have failed to respond adequately
to conventional antiemetic treatments, on 14 February 1995. There are no restrictions
on its prescribing in the National Health Service.
Sativex (nabiximols) is an oromucosal spray that contains THC and cannabidiol
(CBD). It was issued a marketing authorisation by the MHRA, for treatment of
spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis who have failed to respond adequately to
other anti-spasticity medications, on 16 June 2010. In October 2014, the National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended that Sativex is not offered for
use on the NHS because it is not a cost-effective treatment. Sativex therefore is not
routinely prescribed on the NHS, and can only be prescribed for an individual patient,
where local governance and funding arrangements allow for this.
Jo Stevens: [251365]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 24
April 2019 to Question 244142 on Cannabis: Medical Treatments, whether his
Department is aware of any instances of (a) CBD and (b) THC being prescribed by the
NHS since 1 January 2019.
Seema Kennedy:
The published data shows that the following number of items of Nabilone (a synthetic
product which mimics tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) and Sativex (a product containing
natural THC and cannabidiol (CBD)) were dispensed in January and February 2019.
NUMBER OF PRESCRIPTION ITEMS
January 2019 February 2019
Nabilone 44 36
Sativex 167 159
Data, from the NHS Business Services Authority for January and February 2019,
suggest that three National Health Service prescriptions were dispensed for
unlicensed cannabis-based products for medicinal use in primary care in England
during this time. Additionally, the NHS Business Services Authority data report that
10 private prescriptions were dispensed for unlicensed cannabis-based products for
medicinal use in January and February 2019.
Unlike NHS primary care where all dispensed prescriptions are processed centrally,
this is not the case for secondary care. This information is collected by a third party
and not routinely published.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Death
Andy Slaughter: [251937]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many deaths were caused
by Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in affected areas in England during the air
pollution episode in April 2019; and what comparative assessment he has made of the
figures for that period with (a) expected average and (b) average over the last five years.
Seema Kennedy:
According to the Daily Air Quality Index (DAQI) there were ‘moderate’ to ‘very high’
levels of air pollution in some areas of the United Kingdom between 7 and 8 April and
between 15 to 25 April 2019. The figures for deaths caused by chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease in this period are not available in the requested format and a
comparative assessment has not been made.
In January 2019 the Government launched the Clean Air Strategy, which sets out
plans for dealing with all sources of air pollution to save lives, protect nature and
boost the economy.
Eating Disorders
Paul Farrelly: [251225]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to enforce
NICE guidance on Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, to ensure that people with
a healthy BMI are not denied treatment for an eating disorder.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on ‘Eating
disorders: recognition and treatment’ makes it clear that a person’s Body Mass Index
is just one of the factors that should be taken into account to determine whether to
offer treatment for an eating disorder, but that it should not be used on its own.
Clinical commissioning groups and providers of healthcare are expected to have
regard to national guidance and are responsible for developing their own local
approaches to its implementation taking into account local priorities and needs.
Food: Labelling
Paula Sherriff: [252038]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress his Department
is making on introducing comprehensive calorie labelling for food and drink served out of
the home; and when his Department plans to publish the results of the consultation on
that matter, which closed on 25 October 2018.
Seema Kennedy:
The consultation on calorie labelling for food and drink served outside of the home
took place between 14 September and 7 December 2018. We will publish the results
and set out the timetable for further action later this year.
General Practitioners: Students
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251215]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to ensure that university students have access to a GP outside of term time.
Seema Kennedy:
In the event that students cannot access their usual university general practitioner
(GP) outside of term time then they can receive care by registering as a temporary
resident elsewhere.
Guidance has recently been issued by NHS England for GP practices on registering
temporary residents. This is part of the 2019/20 guidance and audit requirements for
the General Medical Services contract, and can be viewed at the following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/gp/gpfv/investment/gp-contract/
Health Services: Artificial Intelligence
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251190]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what guidance his Department
has issued to businesses in the healthcare sector on preparing their workforce for the
effect of the introduction of Artificial Intelligence.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The Department is leading on the Prime Minister’s Mission to ‘Use data, Artificial
Intelligence and innovation to transform the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment
of chronic diseases by 2030.’ We hope that as we work towards this overall goal, we
can ensure that patients experience better care, clinicians deliver better care,
commissioners are better able to commission data-driven technologies and the
United Kingdom is a great place to do business in artificial intelligence for health and
care.
We are working in partnership with organisations across the National Health Service,
the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Office for Life Sciences,
Office for Artificial Intelligence and Better Regulation Executive to engage with
businesses in the sector so that we benefit from the potential for artificial intelligence
to improve care, deliver better outcomes, contribute to efficiency in the health and
care system and contribute to the wider economy. In September 2018, we published
the Code of Conduct for Data-Driven Health and Care Technology, which clearly sets
out the behaviours we expect from those developing artificial intelligence and related
technologies. The Code was updated in February 2019 based on feedback, including
from industry partners, and we are working with them to develop case studies
showing good practice in complying with the Code. We are also developing tools to
help businesses comply the Code of Conduct.
We are also working closely with Health Education England as they follow through on
the recommendations made by the Topol Review ‘Preparing the healthcare workforce
to deliver the digital future.’
In March 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence published its
Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies, outlining the
evidence required by businesses to demonstrate the effectiveness and economic
impact of digital health technologies.
Hepatitis: Disease Control
Sir Peter Bottomley: [249819]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his
Department has made of the potential merits of producing a hepatitis C elimination
strategy to support the recently announced NHS England deal to help eliminate hepatitis
C.
Seema Kennedy:
The Government is committed to meeting the World Health Organization (WHO)
target of eliminating hepatitis C by 2030 but there are no plans at this time to publish
a strategy to eliminate hepatitis C. A variety of initiatives are underway in England to
improve awareness and case finding, re-engagement and linkage to care, especially
in drug services, primary care, prisons and accident and emergency centres. In
addition, NHS England is funding access to new hepatitis C treatments in accordance
with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
A summary of progress towards achieving the elimination goal was published in 2017
in Public Health England’s report, ‘Hepatitis C in the UK’ at the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/632465
/HCV_in_the_uk_report_2017.pdf
This showed that the United Kingdom is on target to meet the WHO interim goal of
reducing hepatitis C mortality by 10% by 2020. Better access to improved treatment
has led to the first fall in deaths from severe hepatitis C related liver disease in a
decade.
Hepatitis: Primary Health Care
Sir Peter Bottomley: [249817]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to improve awareness of hepatitis C among primary care professionals.
Seema Kennedy:
A variety of initiatives are underway in England to improve hepatitis C awareness and
case finding, re-engagement and linkage to care, especially in drug services, primary
care, prisons and accident and emergency centres. In addition, NHS England is
funding access to new hepatitis C treatments in accordance with guidance from the
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Public Health England has developed and shared materials with a range of
stakeholders, including the voluntary sector, to help raise awareness of hepatitis C
infection and highlight the need for those at risk to seek testing and treatment. The
resources and materials available comprise of posters, a quiz, social media videos
and social banners in a variety of different languages; all of these resources are
available online to download or order by healthcare professionals as well as the
public themselves.
Hospitals: Discharges
Barbara Keeley: [251993]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what proportion of people
discharged or transferred under the Transforming Care programme were readmitted to in-
patient facilities within (i) one month, (ii) three months and (iii) one year of their discharge.
Caroline Dinenage:
Figures for inpatient admissions within the month by admissions status are attached.
Admission status is calculated for all admissions within the period and looking to see
if the patient had previously been receiving inpatient care. It provides information for
readmissions in the last 30 days, 90 days and within the last year.
The Assuring Transformation collection covers England, but includes patients whose
care is commissioned in England and provided elsewhere in the United Kingdom.
Data is submitted monthly so coverage varies month-on-month. Therefore, caution
should be taken when interpreting the data.
Attachments:
1. PQ251993 [Copy of PQ 251993 (002) v2.xlsx]
Barbara Keeley: [251994]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many discharges under
the Transforming Care programme were delayed due to inadequate funding for an
alternative placement in each 12-month period between March 2015 and March 2019.
Barbara Keeley: [251997]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the (a) number and (b)
value of payments made by NHS bodies to local authorities under the Transforming Care
programme to support patients discharged in each 12-month period was between March
2015 and March 2019.
Caroline Dinenage:
The information on delayed discharges is not held in the format requested. NHS
Digital routinely publishes the number of delayed discharges in relation to the
Transforming Care programme in their monthly Assuring Transformation (AT)
publication which can be found at the following link:
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/learning-disability-
services-statistics
The most recent AT data indicates that in March 2019, there were 105 delayed
discharges.
The AT data includes the reason for discharge. In March 2019 the reason for a
delayed discharge was as follows:
REASON FOR DELAYED DISCHARGE NUMBER OF INPATIENTS*
Lack of agreed health care funding 10
Lack of agreed social care funding 15
Awaiting non-acute NHS care 5
Awaiting residential home 30
Awaiting nursing home 0
Awaiting care package in own home 10
Awaiting community equipment 0
Patient or family choice 10
Lack of local health provision 10
Lack of social care support 20
Lack of suitable housing provision 40
Other reason for delay 50
Total delayed discharges 105
Note:
* The reasons do not sum to the total number of delays as there may be multiple
reasons assigned.
NHS England does not hold information on the number and value of payments made
by NHS bodies to local authorities under the Transforming Care programme to
support patients discharged in each 12-month period between March 2015 and
March 2019.
Barbara Keeley: [251995]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, under the Transforming Care
programme how many patients have died prior to discharge in each 12-month period
between March 2015 and March 2019.
Caroline Dinenage:
The following patient deaths were recorded in the Assuring Transformation dataset
between March 2015 and March 2019:
YEAR NUMBER OF PATIENT DEATHS*
1 March 2015 - 31 March 2016 15
1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017 15
YEAR NUMBER OF PATIENT DEATHS*
1 April 2017 – 31 March 2018 10
1 April 2018 – 31 March 2019 10
Total number of deaths** 45
Notes:
* These figures are rounded and so the total does not equal the sum of the individual
years.
** There are an additional four patients known to NHS England but not recorded in
Assuring Transformation data. NHS England does not have a date of death for these
cases.
Barbara Keeley: [251996]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, under the Transforming Care
programme how many patients have had discharge dates set which have now passed
without the patient being discharged.
Caroline Dinenage:
NHS Digital routinely publishes the number of delayed discharges in relation to the
Transforming Care programme in their monthly Assuring Transformation (AT)
publication which can be found at the following link:
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/learning-disability-
services-statistics
The most recent AT data indicates that in March 2019, there were 105 delayed
discharges.
Medical Records: Databases
Tom Brake: [251878]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 2
May 2019 to Question 247544, if the Government will conduct a review of its policy of
charging commercial, public sector and charitable organisations to access patient data.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
As stated in response to Question 247544, organisations may seek to recover the
costs of processing and providing data. This position remains under review.
Mental Capacity
Julian Sturdy: [250452]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans he has in place to
ensure that the framework for mental capacity and deprivation of liberty measures are
kept under continuous review.
Caroline Dinenage:
The Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill introduces a new Liberty Protection
Safeguards model, which will replace the current Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
The new model will be set out in a statutory Code of Practice, which will provide
guidance to practitioners and individuals. This will include where a deprivation of
liberty does and does not apply. The Government has committed to initially reviewing
the Code within three years of the new system coming into force and then within five
years of any previous review. These reviews will help inform whether the system is
working as intended.
Mental Health Inter-ministerial Group
Luciana Berger: [252089]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 6
February 2019 to Question 214539 on Mental Health Inter-ministerial Group, on what
date the inter-ministerial group for mental health last met; and what items were on the
agenda.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The inter-ministerial group for mental health met on 29 April 2019. The agenda
included discussion on the progress of the Government’s existing mental health
commitments and new challenges going forward.
Mental Health Services: Wirral
Frank Field: [251247]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment he has
made of the adequacy of access to mental health services for (a) adults, (b) children and
(c) young people in Wirral.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The Department has made no such assessment. Clinical commissioning groups are
responsible for ensuring adequate provision and access to mental health services for
their local populations. Following a detailed procurement exercise, Wirral Health and
Care Commissioning appointed a new provider for its Improving Access to
Psychological Therapies service which commenced in April 2019. The service is
available for those over 18 experiencing common mental health problems.
Wirral Health and Care Commissioning is also working with local providers to look at
areas of transformation needed to reduce the waits and improve patient experience
and access in secondary care, for children and young people and adults. This will
include crisis care and physical health in serious mental illness.
In its Long Term Plan, the National Health Service has committed to test and roll out
comprehensive waiting time standards for adults and children over the next decade.
This builds on existing waiting times targets for psychological therapies, and for
treatment for first episode psychosis and children and young people with eating
disorders, which are all being met or on track for delivery by 2020/21 in line with
previous commitments.
NHS and Social Services: Migrant Workers
Julian Sturdy: [250451]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent discussions he has
had with the Home Secretary on ensuring that the recruitment of overseas staff into the
(a) NHS and (b) social care sector is not adversely affected by the new immigration
framework.
Stephen Hammond:
My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has regular
discussions with the Home Secretary on a range of subjects including the future
immigration system and its impact on the health and social care sectors.
NHS: Drugs
Anne Marie Morris: [252063]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Health
Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018, how many
times his Department has sought information relating to bespoke medicines from small
producers with an annual NHS turnover of less than £5 million; and whether he plans to
make an assessment on the potential merits of requiring all small producers to
automatically supply quarterly information on those medicines.
Anne Marie Morris: [252064]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Health
Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018, what
criteria his Department uses to decide on which small producers to seek information from.
Seema Kennedy:
The Health Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations
2018 (the Regulations) prescribe when manufacturers, importers and wholesalers of
special medicinal products are required to provide information. Since the Regulations
entered into force, quarterly information has been received in November 2018 and
February 2019 and information is again due at the end of May 2019. The requirement
to provide quarterly sales, purchase and volume information about special medicinal
products already applies to all manufacturers, importers and wholesalers regardless
of their size. Therefore, there is no need for an assessment on the potential merits of
requiring all small producers to automatically supply quarterly information.
Anne Marie Morris: [252065]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Health
Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018, what steps
he is taking to ensure that (a) wholesalers and (b) importers are providing his Department
with information on medicines.
Seema Kennedy:
The Department is undertaking an exercise to ensure that all companies that are
required to provide quarterly information under the Health Service Products
(Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018 (the Regulations) are
doing so. Where they are not, the Department will consider taking the appropriate
action provided for in the Regulations.
Anne Marie Morris: [252066]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when he plans to use the
powers set out in the Health Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information)
Regulations 2018 to seek information on the special health service medicine selected yy
medical professional bodies.
Seema Kennedy:
The Department selects medicines to be included in the quarterly collection of
information on special medicinal products based on the level of prescribing. If medical
professional bodies have selected special medicinal products that they believe should
be included with a reimbursement price in Part VIIIB of the Drug Tariff then the
Department will consider including those products in the quarterly collection, but only
if those products are prescribed in primary care. If products are not prescribed in
primary care then there is no sales, purchase and volume information for special
medicinal products supplied to primary care that can be provided by suppliers in the
quarterly information collection.
NHS: Fees and Charges
Sir Desmond Swayne: [251187]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to
ensure that patients who are not eligible for free NHS treatment are charged the relevant
fee; and if he will make a statement.
Stephen Hammond:
Under the National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amended)
Regulations 2017, providers of National Health Service secondary funded care are
required by law to make and recover costs from patient who are not ordinarily
resident in the United Kingdom where no category of exemption applies. In cases
where treatment is non-urgent, providers are required to recover costs in advance of
treatment.
In order to assist providers in doing this, the Department has issued guidance to
providers of NHS funded secondary care ‘Guidance on implementing the overseas
visitors charging regulations’ which set out the rules and best practices processes to
follow to recover costs for treatment, including identifying those who may be
chargeable and ensuring they are charged the relevant fee. This includes identifying
those patients whose treatment costs may be subject to reciprocal healthcare
arrangements, including the European Health Insurance Card. The national guidance
sets out that those patients who are identified as chargeable must be charged using
either the national tariff or a locally agreed tariff if there is no national tariff for the
treatment provided.
NHS: Migrant Workers
Layla Moran: [251433]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an
estimate of the number of EU nationals who have left their jobs at (a) NHS England and
(b) Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in the last (i) year, (ii) two years
and (iii) three years.
Stephen Hammond:
The following table shows the number of EU27 leavers from NHS England as at
September each year since 2015 and to January 2019, headcount.
LEAVERS FROM NHS ENGLAND
September 2015 - September 2016 19
September 2016 - September 2017 14
September 2017 - September 2018 41
September 2018 - January 2019 30
Source: Electronic Staff Record
NHS Digital publishes Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS) workforce
statistics. These include staff working in hospital trusts and clinical commissioning
groups, but not staff working in in general practitioner surgeries, local authorities or
other providers.
The following table shows the number of EU27 leavers from Oxford University
Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust as at September each year since 2015 and to
January 2019 (the latest data), headcount.
TIME PERIOD
LEAVERS FROM OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
September 2015 - September 2016 253
September 2016 - September 2017 341
TIME PERIOD
LEAVERS FROM OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
September 2017 - September 2018 362
September 2018 - January 2019 138
Source: National Health Service HCHS monthly workforce statistics, NHS Digital
Notes:
The total number of EU27 nationals leaving each organisation is smaller than the
total number of EU27 nationals who joined between September 2015 and September
2018.
Nationality is self-reported.
Leavers data from Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust may include
staff that have left to join other NHS trusts.
Leavers data includes people leaving active service temporarily, this would include
those going on maternity leave or career break.
NHS: Vacancies
Sir Greg Knight: [251914]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many NHS positions were
vacant as of 30 April 2019 (a) in Yorkshire and (b) at Bridlington hospital.
Stephen Hammond:
The data is not available in the format requested.
NHS Improvement produces statistics on the number of vacancies for each trust in
England. The vacancy statistics are published at the regional level of North, Midlands
and East, London and South. The published data is not available at the county level
of Yorkshire or Bridlington hospital.
The latest NHS Improvement report can be found in the following link:
https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/4942/Performance_of_the_NHS_provider_se
ctor_for_the_quarter_ended_31_Dec_2018.pdf
Nurses: Pay
Julian Sturdy: [250453]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent steps he has taken
to ensure the adequate remuneration of nurses at all pay bands.
Stephen Hammond:
In June 2018 we agreed the Agenda for Change three year pay and contract reform
deal which will see nearly one million National Health Service workers benefit over
three years.
The deal gave all staff, including nurses in all pay bands, a pay rise of at least 3% for
2018/19. Over the course of the three years, nurses at the top of their pay band will
receive a total pay increase of 6.5% and those below the top of their pay band, due to
reforms to the pay structure (higher starting pay and fewer pay points), will see pay
rises of between 9% and 29%.
The basic pay for a newly qualified nurse will rise from £22,128 to £24,907 over the
three years.
In addition to basic pay, nurses are paid for working unsocial hours and an additional
allowance if they work in and around London. The average earnings of a qualified
nurse as at December 2018 was £32,280.
The deal was negotiated and agreed with the NHS trade unions and supported by the
independent NHS Pay Review Body.
Obesity: Children
Frank Field: [251921]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 8
May 2019 to Question 249880, which local authorities have received funding to deliver
the trailblazer programme.
Seema Kennedy:
The local authorities that have gone through to the discovery phase of the Trailblazer
Programme and received funding are:
- Bath and North East Somerset Council;
- Birmingham City Council;
- Blackburn with Darwen Council;
- City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council;
- London Borough of Havering;
- London Borough of Lewisham;
- Middlesbrough Council;
- North Tyneside Council;
- North Yorkshire County Council;
- Nottinghamshire County Council;
- Peterborough City Council;
- Rochdale Borough Council; and
- Walsall Council.
The next phase of the Trailblazer Programme begins early this summer when five
authorities will be selected from this list to take forward their plans to address
childhood obesity at local level over the next three years.
Ophthalmic Services: ICT
Alistair Burt: [R] [249879]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans his Department has
to allocate funding to IT connectivity for primary care optical practices to ensure safe and
efficient referrals to hospital eye departments.
Seema Kennedy:
The Department has no plans to allocate funding to enable IT connectivity between
primary care optical practices and hospital eye departments. NHS England is
continuing to work with the eye care sector and other key stakeholders on this area of
work and will be considering priorities for IT investment later this year.
Ovarian Cancer
Mr Laurence Robertson: [251890]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to
reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer; and if he will make a statement.
Seema Kennedy:
Prevention is a key focus of the NHS Long Term Plan, which sets out plans to tackle
risk factors for cancer such as obesity, alcohol consumption and smoking. This will
have a significant impact on improving health, including for those who are at risk of
developing ovarian cancer. Over the next 10 years the National Health Service will
extend the use of molecular diagnostic testing and routine offering genomic testing to
all patients with cancer for whom it would be of clinical benefit.
From 2019 we will start the roll-out of new Rapid Diagnostic Centres across the
country to upgrade and bring together the latest diagnostic equipment and expertise,
building on 10 models piloted with Cancer Research UK, which have focused on
diagnosing cancers where patients often present with non-specific symptoms, often
the case with ovarian cancer, and may go to their general practitioner many times
before being sent for tests, such as blood and stomach cancers.
Mr Laurence Robertson: [251891]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to
improve the treatment of ovarian cancer; and if he will make a statement.
Seema Kennedy:
The NHS Cancer Programme is committed through the NHS Long Term Plan to
improve access to treatments for all cancer patients and reduce health inequalities.
Cancer Alliances are working with local sustainability and transformation partnerships
and integrated care systems to reduce variation on patient outcomes and experience.
Pregnancy: Screening
Jo Swinson: [251992]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of the potential benefits to maternal and neonatal outcomes of offering 36 week
ultrasound scans to identify breech babies.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Quality Standard
relating the best antenatal care (QS22) states that women with a suspected breech
presentation at 36 weeks or later should be referred for confirmatory ultrasound
assessment. Quality Standard 22 was published in September 2012 and was most
recently updated in April 2016.
Quality Standards are important in setting out to patients, the public, commissioners
and providers what a high-quality service should look like in a particular area of care.
Whilst providers and commissioners must have regard to NICE QSs in planning and
delivering services, they do not provide a comprehensive service specification and
are not mandatory.
Psychiatry
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251209]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to tackle the imbalance between London and the rest of England in the number of
psychiatrists per head of population.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The allocation of training places/posts in psychiatry is determined centrally by Health
Education England’s (HEE’s) workforce planning team. Training allocations are
normally based on historical allocations, adjusted by weighted capitation and other
factors such as deprivation and health inequalities.
As part of the workforce strategy ‘Facing the Facts, Shaping the Future’, HEE is
looking at incentives to retain the workforce outside of London. For example, some
areas offer Fellowships for Specialist and Associate Specialist doctors or Foundation
doctors that include support for schooling and housing together with a package of
education support and guaranteed employment for two to three years.
In the NHS Long Term Plan, HEE and its partners have committed to developing
further incentives to ensure that the specialty choices of trainees meet the needs of
patients by matching specialty and geographical needs, especially in primary care,
community care and mental health services.
Public Health: Finance
Sir Alan Campbell: [249888]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether the Spending Review
will include targeted investment in public health to improve regional health outcomes.
Seema Kennedy:
Local authorities will receive over £3.1 billion in 2019/20 for use on public health.
Future funding priorities will be determined through the Spending Review process. In
its Long Term Plan, the National Health Service has already committed to strengthen
action on prevention and health inequalities. All local health systems will be expected
to set out in 2019 how they will reduce health inequalities by 2023/24 and 2028/29.
Vicky Foxcroft: [250010]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his
Department has made of the effect of changes in the level of public health budgets on
patients’ health.
Seema Kennedy:
Local authorities will receive over £3.1 billion in 2019/20 for use on public health. It is
for local authorities themselves to determine how best to use these resources based
on their assessment of local need and with regard to their statutory duties. This
funding is in addition to what the National Health Service spends on preventative
interventions such as immunisation and screening, including over £1.2 billion on
national public health functions in 2018/19.
Public Health England monitors and publishes data on trends for the wide range of
indicators of public health set out in the Public Health Outcomes Framework. Most
are stable or improving. The framework can be found at the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/public-health-outcomes-framework
Stephen Morgan: [252121]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the
Consensus Statement, published by Cancer Research UK on 7 May 2019, what
assessment he has made of the implications of that statement for his Department's policy
on ensuring that there is a sustainable funding solution for public health services provided
by local authorities.
Seema Kennedy:
Local authorities will receive over £3.1 billion in 2019/20 for use on public health. It is
for local authorities themselves to determine how best to use these resources based
on their assessment of local need and with regard to their statutory duties. This
funding is in addition to what the National Health Service spends on public health,
which included over £1.2 billion in 2018/19 on national public health programmes
such as immunisations and screening. Future funding arrangements for local
authorities’ health duties will be considered carefully in the next spending review, in
the light of all the available evidence.
HOME OFFICE
101 Calls: Fees and Charges
Frank Field: [251240]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the total amount of charges
to people for calls made to the 101 line was in each year since that line has been in
operation.
Frank Field: [251241]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will make calls to the police
on the non-emergency 101 number free of charge or require that all funds raised from
those call charges be allocated towards frontline policing.
Frank Field: [251242]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many and what proportion
of calls made to the police on the non-emergency 101 number are terminated by the
caller while they are waiting for a person to answer that call.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office does not hold information on total amount of charges for calls to
101.
The Home Office is reviewing charges for the 101 non-emergency telephone number.
While it may not be an option for everyone, the public can also report non-emergency
crimes online via forces’ websites, free of charge. The Home Office is supporting the
digital transformation of policing through programmes such as the Digital Policing
Portfolio (DPP), led by the NPCC. Within the DPP, the Digital Public Contact
programme aims to provide appropriate digital channels for the public to report and
track crime online, facilitating greater public-police interaction in real time.
The Home Office does not hold data on calls to 101 terminated by the caller.
Emma Reynolds: [252110]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made
of the potential merits of abolishing the charge for phone calls to the 101 non emergency
number.
Emma Reynolds: [252112]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Government plans
to abolish the 15 pence charge for 101 calls to the emergency services.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office is reviewing charges for the 101 non-emergency telephone number.
While it may not be an option for everyone, the public can also report non-emergency
crimes online via forces’ websites, free of charge. The Home Office is supporting the
digital transformation of policing through programmes such as the Digital Policing
Portfolio (DPP), led by the NPCC. Within the DPP, the Digital Public Contact
programme aims to provide appropriate digital channels for the public to report and
track crime online, facilitating greater public-police interaction in real time.
Animal Experiments
Dr David Drew: [251889]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which animals have been
licensed for animal experimentation in the UK for any of the last three years figures which
are available.
Mr Ben Wallace:
All animal species that were used in regulated procedures in Great Britain can be
found in Table 1 of the data tables published within the ‘Statistics of Scientific
Procedures on Living Animals’ statistical
reports.https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-
on-living-animals
There is a further breakdown, for the 2017 year only, of those included within the
‘other’ species categories. This can be found within Table 12 of the data tables
published in the 2017 statistical report.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-living-
animals-great-britain-2017
In 2017, the majority of experimental procedures used mice, fish and rats. Together
these three species accounted for 87% of experimental procedures in Great Britain
For Northern Ireland, the Department of Health separately collects and publishes
information on regulated procedures under devolved arrangements
The animal species used in regulated procedures in Northern Ireland can also be
found in Table 1 of the data tables published within the ‘Statistics of Scientific
Procedures on Living Animals in Northern Ireland’ reports. https://www.health-
ni.gov.uk/publications/statistics-scientific-procedures-living-animals-northern-ireland
Animal Experiments: Primates
Dr David Drew: [251212]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what primates were used in
animal experimentation; and from which countries in each of the last three years figures
are available.
Mr Ben Wallace:
Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals in Great Britain are
published on an annual basis. The reports for the last three years are available at
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-
living-animals.
The number of non-human primates used for the first time in procedures in that year
is given in Table 1a of the data tables published in each of the last three statistical
reports.
The place of birth of non-human primates used for the first time in experimental
procedures by species in that year is given in Table 2.2 of the data tables published
in each of the last three statistical reports. Place of birth is presented by whether the
animals were born in the UK, EU, Asia, America, Africa or elsewhere. Data are not
collected on the specific country of birth.
Asylum: Applications
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251908]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate he has made of
the average time taken by his Department to make a decision on an asylum application in
each of the last ten years.
Caroline Nokes:
The Home Office does not publish data on the average time taken to make a decision
on an asylum application in each of the last ten years, nor is that information
available in a retrievable format. However, the Home Office do publish data on the
number of pending applications that have been awaiting an initial decision for more or
less than 6 months. This data can be found at Volume 1, as_01 of the Immigration
Statistics December 2018:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-statistics-year-ending-
december-2018/list-of-tables#asylum
Asylum: Religion
Afzal Khan: [251363]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 26
March 2019 to Question 235381 on Asylum: Religion, what progress his Department has
made on investigating reports that asylum refusals have included quotations from
religious texts; and if he will make a statement.
Caroline Nokes:
After reports indicated that an asylum decision included quotations from religious
texts and was not drafted in accordance with Home Office policy guidance, Asylum
Operations conducted an investigation into this matter. A small number of religious
conversion cases were sampled, and no further cases were identified during this
sampling exercise.
All such decisions are currently subject to further scrutiny, pending the roll out of
additional specialist training, which has been developed in collaboration with the All-
Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for International Freedom of Religion or Belief.
The Asylum Learning and Development Team started to deliver the specialist training
package on religious claims on Monday 8 April, which will be mandatory for all
asylum decision-makers.
Biometrics: Edinburgh
Ian Murray: [251272]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made
of the effect of the requirement for people from Edinburgh to travel to Glasgow for
biometric enrolment facilities on (a) disabled applicants, (b) applications for family visas
and (c) people of limited means; and if he will make a statement.
Caroline Nokes:
UK Visa and Citizenship Application Service (UK VCAS) centres are run by Sopra
Steria Ltd (SSL) on behalf of UK Visas & Immigration (UKVI). Sopra Steria, undertook
market research to identify initial service locations; their research included the impact
on customer travel time, cost and accessibility. There are currently six core sites
across the UK at which application submission services are offered free of charge
and beyond that, SSL offer a range of enhanced services in a further 50 locations.
These services enable customers to submit their biometric information (photo and
fingerprints) and supporting evidence in one location. 62% of customers will, on
average, have to travel less than 25 miles to visit a core service centre, with 78%
travelling less than 50 miles. Appointments may be offered for individual customers
and/or family groups to enrol their biometrics together.
SSL continue to assess customer demand, working closely with UKVI, and are
planning to open a further 6 enhanced service locations throughout May and June,
one of which will be offered in Edinburgh.
SSL are required to provide locations that comply with the Equality Act 2010
(including full compliance with the disability discrimination provisions) and biometric
capture solutions are suitable for different customer groups, including customers with
disabilities.
For customers who are eligible to apply using the Service and Support Centres
(SSCs), it is estimated that 62% of customers will be within 30 miles of their nearest
service centre and customers who meet certain criteria, which may include people of
limited means; will be able to apply for travel assistance.
Domestic Abuse
Peter Aldous: [249933]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when the Government plans to
begin its review of the effectiveness of the controlling or coercive behaviour offence; and
if he will consult specialist violence against women and girls organisations as part of that
review.
Victoria Atkins:
On 21 January we published our landmark draft Domestic Abuse Bill and consultation
response which will transform the cross-Government response to this devastating
crime. In our consultation response we committed to review the effectiveness of the
coercive or controlling behaviour offence to ensure it is fit for purpose and that it
adequately protects victims from abuse.
We are in the early stages of establishing the terms of reference for the review, and
will be consulting with relevant Government and external stakeholders accordingly.
Educational Testing Service
Keith Vaz: [249832]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, on how many occasions (a) he
and (b) officials of his Department have met with representatives from ETS in each year
since 2016.
Caroline Nokes:
Details of meetings with ETS representatives is not held centrally. Home Office
Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide variety of international partners, as
well as organisations and individuals in the public and private sectors, as part of the
process of policy development and delivery. Details of Ministerial meetings are
passed to the Cabinet Office on a quarterly basis and are subsequently published on
the Gov.uk website:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/home-office-ministers-hospitality-
data#history
I can, however, confirm that officials met with representatives from ETS Global BV in
2017 to discuss settlement of the legal action the Department had brought against
the company. More recently discussions with ETS have focused on the ongoing
criminal trials of those believed to have helped organise and facilitate fraudulent
activity.
Educational Testing Service: Prosecutions
Keith Vaz: [249830]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many employees of ETS
have been prosecuted over cases involving TOEIC English Language tests.
Caroline Nokes:
No individuals employed directly by ETS Global BV have been prosecuted. A number
of individuals who were involved in the running of test centres have been prosecuted.
So far 25 people have been convicted for their role in helping to organise the fraud
with convictions of over 70 years handed down to date.
Entry Clearances: Biometrics
Sir Greg Knight: [251913]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment his
Department has made of the (a) accuracy, and (b) ability of facial recognition technology
used at airports.to distinguish between identical twins and other siblings of similar
appearance.
Caroline Nokes:
Facial recognition technology employed by Border Force at airports is regularly
assessed to ensure that it is operating within operational parameters agreed by
ministers. The technology employs a matching algorithm to distinguish between
individuals to confirm identity. There has been no specific research undertaken by
Border Force or Home Office Biometrics into the ability of facial recognition
algorithms to distinguish between identical twins or sib-lings who look very alike.
Firearms: Licensing
Dr David Drew: [251211]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions he has
had with police forces on potential changes to the firearms licensing policy to require a
medical declaration; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Nick Hurd:
Following the introduction of new medical arrangements for firearms licensing in 2016
we have been in discussions with the police, the relevant medical bodies and
representatives of shooting organisations about improving the arrangements, and
how greater consistency can be achieved across England and Wales.
The Policing and Crime Act 2017 introduced a power to enable the Secretary of State
to issue statutory guidance to the police on their firearms licensing functions, and this
guidance will include the relevant medical arrangements. Before issuing the statutory
guidance, the Secretary of State must consult the National Police Chiefs Council and
the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland, and we will also consult
publicly on the guidance before it is finalised. The Government intends to launch the
consultation on the statutory guidance before the summer recess.
Free Movement of People: Arts and Musicians
Paul Farrelly: [251951]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps he is taking to ensure
the maintenance of freedom of movement for touring (a) musicians and (a) artists; and if
he will make an assessment of the potential merits of a two-year multi-entry visa for those
people.
Caroline Nokes:
While the government is clear that free movement will end when we leave the EU, we
are aware that continued access to international talent and the ability for UK talent to
tour are key concerns for the cultural and creative sectors.
Non-EEA musicians and artists can currently enter the UK through a range of routes.
Standard visitors can be paid for their participation at Permit Free Festivals for up to
six months, Permitted Paid Engagement visitors can undertake various engagements
for up to one month and the Tier 5 (Creative and Sporting) route permits artists,
performers and their entourage to work in the UK. Tier 5 visas are granted for up to
12 months and can be extended for up to a maximum of 2 years in the UK.
The Home Office has launched a year-long engagement programme on the
proposals in the White Paper on our future skills-based immigration system. The
Home Office is working with DCMS and creative and cultural industries throughout
this process so that Government approaches policy well informed by those working in
the sector.
Home Office: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250038]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether (a) his Department, (b)
his Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public bodies have
entered into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Victoria Atkins:
Our records show that neither; (a) the Home Department, (b) the Department’s
agencies, or (c) the Department’s associated public bodies have entered into any
contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Home Office are committed to the HMT Transparency Agenda and EU Competition
regulations and therefore all contract requirements and awards that exceed the EU
procurement directives' financial thresholds are advertised in the Supplement to the
Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) via contract notices. Furthermore, all
requirements and contract awards over £10,000 are published on Contracts Finder at
this link: https://www.gov.uk/contracts-finder .
Home Office: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249911]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many civil servants in his
Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the European Union
and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three years.
Victoria Atkins:
Please see the table below for the current numbers of civil servants that have
temporarily moved out of the department to take up posts at DIT or DExEU in each of
the last 3 years. The information provided is a list of current/active transfers that
commenced in each of the three years. It is not possible to provide total numbers
across the time period as the data on those that transferred out of the department but
have since returned is not available.
YEAR
DEPARTMENT FOR EXITING THE
EUROPEAN UNION
DEPARTMENT FOR
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
2018/19 9 6
2017/18 4 5
YEAR
DEPARTMENT FOR EXITING THE
EUROPEAN UNION
DEPARTMENT FOR
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
2016/17 1 1
Total 14 12
Immigrants: Employment
Afzal Khan: [251393]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many employers have used
the digital checking service for right to work checks since its launch.
Caroline Nokes:
Statistics on use of the online right to work service will be published as part of the
Home Office’s Transparency Data by the end of the year.
Immigration: EU Nationals
Afzal Khan: [250511]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many formal complaints his
Department received during the private beta testing phase of the EU Settlement Scheme;
and what the subject of these complaints was.
Caroline Nokes:
The EU Settlement Scheme makes it simple and straight forward for EU citizens and
their family members who want to stay in the UK to get the immigration status they
need.
Over 31,000 people applied during the two private beta testing phases. Just one
complaint was received through the formal complaints process during this time. The
complaint was in response to a technical issue and was resolved satisfactorily.
Afzal Khan: [250512]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to feedback on
the private beta two phase of the EU Settlement Scheme, what feedback was provided
by people who neither spoke highly nor gave a neutral response.
Caroline Nokes:
As part of our commitment to improving the application process for customers,
feedback during both the private beta 1 and 2 phases and the public beta phase was
sought via a voluntary online survey. In total, 1,330 applicants completed the survey
during private beta 2. Of these 61% of customers said they would speak highly of the
application process, 19% said they would be neutral, 19% would be critical and 1%
said they did not know.
Changes were made to the system as a result of this feedback, ahead of the public
beta test phase. In the public beta test phase, 75% of applicants completing the
survey said they would speak highly of the application process, 15% said they would
be neutral and 11% would be critical. With regards to completing the application form,
in the public beta phase 81% said completing the form was either easy of fairly easy
with a further 8% finding it neither difficult or easy.
Overseas Students: English Language
Keith Vaz: [249831]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much his Department has
spent on (a) internal investigations, (b) court fees and (c) deportation in cases involving
TOEIC students since 2016.
Caroline Nokes:
The information requested is not held centrally by the Home Office.
Keith Vaz: [249833]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many students have taken
the TOEIC English language test since 2016.
Caroline Nokes:
ETS were removed from the list of approved test providers for immigration purposes
on 1 July 2014. A current list of tests and test centres approved by UK Visas and
Immigration to show that applicants have the required level of English for their visa is
available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-applying-
for-uk-visa-approved-english-language-tests
Police: Pensions
Tim Farron: [250001]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what reasons the treatment
of survivor pensions for police widows and widowers is different from that of such
pensions for the widows and widowers of armed forces personnel.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Government believes that there is a specific justification for allowing all surviving
partners of Armed Forces Pension Scheme members to retain their survivor’s
pension for life. The combination of risk to life in the execution of duty and disruption
to family life is unique to Armed Forces personnel.
The Government has accepted that the arguments were compelling in respect of
police officers who have died as a result of an injury on duty. Changes to the Police
Pension Scheme were made with effect from April 2015 to allow surviving spouses or
civil partners of those police officers to receive survivor benefits for life.
Ruth George: [250024]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what reasons the treatment
of survivor pensions for police widows and widowers is different from that of such
pensions for the widows and widowers of armed forces personnel.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Government believes that there is a specific justification for allowing all surviving
partners of Armed Forces Pension Scheme members to retain their survivor’s
pension for life. The combination of risk to life in the execution of duty and disruption
to family life is unique to Armed Forces personnel.
The Government has accepted that the arguments were compelling in respect of
police officers who have died as a result of an injury on duty. Chang-es to the Police
Pension Scheme were made with effect from April 2015 to allow surviving spouses or
civil partners of those police officers to receive survivor benefits for life.
Theft: Wales
Jo Stevens: [252052]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment his
Department has made of trends in the level of reported incidents of (a) burglary and (b)
petty theft in Wales in the last five years.
Victoria Atkins:
We are committed to tackling all forms of acquisitive crime, including burglary. The
Minister for Policing and the Fire Service chaired the first meeting of a new Burglary
Taskforce which brings together the police, industry, charities and others to look at
what more can be done to tackle this crime.
The Office for National Statistics publishes on a quarterly basis the numbers of
crimes reported to and recorded to the four police forces in Wales. Data can be found
in the police force area tables:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/poli
ceforceareadatatables
This includes breakdowns of burglary and other types of theft. There is no specific
classification of ‘petty theft’ and such incidents will be included across a range of theft
types.
UK Visas and Immigration: Conditions of Employment
Luciana Berger: [252085]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum decision
makers are employed in asylum operations offices in (a) Bootle, (b) Croydon, (c) Leeds,
(d) Liverpool, (e) Newcastle and (f) Solihull.
Luciana Berger: [252086]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (a) how many and (b) what
proportion of Asylum Decision Makers are employed on permanent contracts.
Luciana Berger: [252087]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many Asylum Decision
Makers have had their six-month probation contracts as advertised extended in (a) 2018
and (b) 2019.
Luciana Berger: [252088]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum decision
maker posts are currently vacant.
Caroline Nokes:
As of week ending 10 May 2019, the number of asylum decision makers that are
currently employed in asylum operations offices in (a) Bootle, (b) Croydon, (c) Leeds,
(d) Liverpool, (e) Newcastle and (f) Solihull are:
Bootle 113.76 FTE Croydon 69.40 FTE Leeds 54.37 FTE Liverpool 57.66 FTE
Newcastle 32.64 FTE Solihull 34.16 FTE Total 362.00 FTE
Additionally, the Home Office currently employs 171.40 FTE decision makers in other
locations; a total of 533.40 FTE. Of the 533.40 FTE are employed, 532.40 FTE are on
permanent contracts and 1.00 FTE is employed on a Fixed Term Appointment (FTA)
contract. The Home Office is currently recruiting and working towards 632.00 FTE
asylum decision makers.
The Home Office is unable to report how many asylum decision makers have had
their six-month probation contracts as advertised extended in (a) 2018 and (b) 2019,
as to obtain this information would require a manual trawl and could only be obtained
at disproportionate costs.
Undocumented Migrants: Detainees
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251911]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps his Department is
taking to implement a statutory limit for the length of time suspected illegal immigrants
can be detained.
Caroline Nokes:
As Stephen Shaw noted in his follow up review of the welfare of vulnerable people in
immigration detention, the debate on a time limit for immigration de-tention rests
mainly on slogans rather than evidence. My rt. hon. Friend the Home Secretary has
commissioned an internal review of how time limits work in other countries and how
these relate to any other protections within the de-tention systems in those countries.
Visas: Ministers of Religion
Patrick Grady: [251347]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will publish a response to
Early Day Motion (a) 2358 on Changes to visa requirements for religious workers and (b)
2362 on Tier 5 visas for ministers of religion.
Caroline Nokes:
The Government very much values the importance of religious and cultural
expression to our communities in the UK and we continue to welcome Ministers of
Religion from all faiths who wish to come to the UK in accordance with our
Immigration Rules.
There are two routes for Religious Workers in the current immigration system.
Tier 2 Ministers of Religion is for those playing a leading role as faith leaders in our
religious institutions. This category requires those coming to have a strong command
of the English language in order to ensure Ministers of Religion can lead their
congregations effectively and can interact with the wider communities they serve.
The second route, Tier 5 Religious Workers, is for those undertaking non-pastoral
roles supporting the activities of these institutions. In line with our other temporary
work categories, Tier 5 Religious Workers are not required to demonstrate their
English language skills when applying for a visa.
We have taken steps to prevent our temporary work categories being used as a
means to live in the UK for longer periods. Tier 5 is designed to facilitate short
periods of knowledge sharing and cultural exchange and yet we have identified
evidence of migrants using our Tier 5 Religious Worker and Charity Worker routes to
facilitate near continuous residence in the UK.
We made changes to the Immigration Rules in October 2018 to preclude the use of
Tier 5 by minister of Religion and to introduce a ‘cooling off period’, preventing Tier 5
Religious worker and Tier 5 Charity Worker visa holders from returning to the UK, via
these immigration routes, for 12 months after their visa expires. This approach
underpins the Government’s intention that these are temporary routes.
Bona fide Ministers of Religion are still welcome to come to the UK and that there
remains a route for them in the immigration system through Tier 2.
The Government wrote to faith leaders in December, setting out the detail and
explaining the rationale for the changes. Officials remain in regular contact with
stakeholders and we are embarking on an extensive programme of engagement, in
connection with the future immigration system.
Visas: Sponsorship
Jo Stevens: [252053]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment his
Department has made of trends in the number of companies in the (a) digital, (b) arts and
(c) sports sectors registered to sponsor immigration visas of any tier with a view to
ensuring preparedness in the sector for the new immigration system after the UK leaves
the EU.
Caroline Nokes:
In December 2018, the Government set out its proposals in “The UK’s future Skills-
based Immigration System” White Paper, which is due to come into force from
January 2021.
We are determined to ensure that the future immigration system is efficient and able
to respond to users’ needs, and as proposed in the White Paper, we will reform
existing sponsorship arrangements – streamlining, simplifying and minimising
bureaucracy.
The Government values the positive contribution made to the UK by the digital, arts
and sporting sectors and we want this to continue. We will ensure that the new
system continues to support the UK’s thriving cultural and sporting life and will also
explore options to support start-up companies in our new, expanding digital
technology sector.
The White Paper is the start of a conversation and we hav launched a year-long
engagement programme to take the views of a range of stakeholders across the UK,
including the digital, arts and sporting sectors.
Windrush Generation: Compensation
Afzal Khan: [252023]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will make it his policy to
ensure that Windrush compensation scheme payments will not be taken into account in
eligibility assessments for means-tested benefits.
Caroline Nokes:
The Government Response to the Windrush Consultation states at paragraph 4.50
on page 39 that we will exempt Windrush compensation payments from the
calculation for income related benefits. The Home Office has been working with
colleagues in the Department for Work and Pensions to action this.
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Buildings: Insulation
John Healey: [249212]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with
reference to the remediation of ACM cladding on privately-owned residential buildings,
how many owners of such buildings (a) the Government has contacted directly to
communicate the Government's expectation that leaseholders will be financially protected
from the costs of such remediation, (b) have replied to that correspondence and (c) have
said that they will financially protect leaseholders from the cost of such remediation.
James Brokenshire:
I have written to all private sector building owners who are currently committed to
passing on costs to leaseholders to make clear my strong expectation that
leaseholders should be protected from costs. However, too many building owners
have failed to take responsibility for ensuring these buildings are permanently
remediated swiftly, and at no cost to leaseholders. I have therefore concluded that it
is imperative for the Government to act. On 9 May we announced a fund for the
remediation of unsafe Aluminium Composite Material cladding on all high-rise (over
18 metres) residential private sector buildings in England. It will allow remediation to
happen quickly, it will restore peace of mind and it will allow residents living in these
blocks to get on with their lives.
John Healey: [249215]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will
publish the names of the (a) owners and (b) developers who (i) have and (ii) have not
committed to ensuring that leaseholders do not pay for the remediation of ACM cladding
materials used on their homes.
James Brokenshire:
I have written to all relevant building owners setting out my strong expectation that
leaseholders should be protected from costs. We are not publishing details which
could identify buildings because of the risk to public safety. On 9 May we announced
a fund for the remediation of unsafe Aluminium Composite Material cladding on all
high-rise (over 18 metres) residential private sector buildings in England. A number of
owners and developers, including Taylor Wimpey, Legal and General, Mace Group,
Lendlease, Barratt Developments and Aberdeen Standard Investments have agreed
to maintain their commitments to fund remediation. I commend them for the
responsible and moral position they have taken.
Community Land Trusts
Bill Wiggin: [249886]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
plans he has to support Community Land Trusts in making homes more affordable.
Kit Malthouse:
The Government supports the community-led housebuilding sector – of which
community land trusts are an important part – through the annual £60 million
Community Housing Fund. The Fund is delivered outside London by Homes England
and within London by the Greater London Authority. Capital and revenue grants are
available to community-based groups wishing to take forward schemes to build
locally affordable housing. Through the Fund, the Government is also supporting a
consortium of the major stakeholder groups (including the National Community Land
Trust Network) to develop a network of technical advisors to support community-
based groups though the process of developing their housebuilding schemes.
The Community Housing Fund is currently scheduled to close in March 2020.
Decisions on funding for 2020-21 onwards are a matter for the Spending Review,
which will take place this year.
Domestic Abuse: Victim Support Schemes
Helen Hayes: [252017]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, when his
Department plans to publish the public consultation on the future funding of domestic
abuse services.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
I am pleased to announce that, having carried out a review of how domestic abuse
services are locally commissioned across England, we have today launched a
consultation on Future Delivery of Support to Victims and their Children in
Accommodation-Based Domestic Abuse Services. The consultation can be found at
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/support-for-victims-of-domestic-abuse-
in-safe-accommodation.
We are proposing a duty which requires a partnership approach to supporting victims
and their children based on a robust understanding of local need for support. This will
be accompanied by Statutory Guidance that will clarify Government expectations in
this regard.
We believe our proposals will promote sustainable, consistent, support for all victims,
informed by understanding the needs across local areas and taking account of the
needs of diverse victim groups, such as those with protected characteristics and
victims with complex needs.
Through this consultation, we would like to hear from victims and survivors, service
providers, local authorities and other public agencies, as well as other professionals
who support victims and their children every day.
Housing
Alistair Burt: [249856]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
assessment he has made of the effect of recent changes to the calculation of housing
need on local authorities that are awaiting the adoption of their local plan.
Alistair Burt: [249857]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how
many local authorities are without a five year housing land supply as a result of the
decision to apply the new method of calculating housing need while awaiting the adoption
of local plans.
Kit Malthouse:
We are committed to a plan-led system that delivers the homes this country needs,
while protecting our precious environment. Up-to-date plans provide a sound basis
for assessing land supply, and it is only where plans have become out-of-date that
our standard method for assessing housing need is used instead. What this means in
practice will depend on the amount of land with permission in each area, the
protections that apply and the stage an emerging plan has reached, and so there is
no national estimate of the impact. The National Planning Policy Framework protects
emerging plans in certain circumstances, even in the absence of a five-year land
supply, where a development would significantly undermine the plan.
Housing: Construction
Dr Lisa Cameron: [250004]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
steps the Government is taking to ensure that local authorities monitor the number of new
build homes that comply with optional accessibility standards set out in building
regulations.
Kit Malthouse:
We have strengthened the policy for securing accessible housing, by expecting local
planning authorities to use the Government’s optional technical standards for
accessible and adaptable housing when preparing their plans, where this would
address an identified need for such properties. Our planning guidance sets out the
role of local planning authorities in monitoring the implementation of plans. Authorities
can include the provision of accessible housing when preparing their Authority
Monitoring Reports, but this is not mandatory.
Housing: Disability
Dr Lisa Cameron: [249945]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
steps his Department is taking under the Public Sector Equality Duty to ensure that
disabled people are not negatively affected by the Government's housing policies.
Kit Malthouse:
Ensuring that our policies take into account the different needs of the population and
ensure equality of experience, access and opportunity is not just the law, but it helps
ensure that our interventions are effective and therefore worthwhile.
The department, like the rest of Government, takes the Public Sector Equality Duty
very seriously, ensuring policy development and implementation appropriately takes
into account the needs of people with disabilities.
Housing: Older People
Jim Shannon: [251313]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how
many local authorities have detailed planning guidance in place for the provision of
specialist housing for older people.
Kit Malthouse:
In the revised National Planning Policy Framework, we strengthened policy to create
a clear expectation that all local authorities have policies in place for addressing the
housing needs of older people. All plans submitted to the Planning Inspectorate after
24 January 2019 will need to comply with the revised Framework. We will publish
new planning guidance shortly that will provide advice to authorities about
implementing this policy. The number of authorities with their own detailed planning
guidance on the provision of specialist housing for older people is not recorded.
Marriage Guidance: Finance
Fiona Bruce: [251266]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how
much and what proportion of funding for relationships support provided through the
troubled families programme has been ring-fenced for marriage support.
Rishi Sunak:
The Troubled Families Programme is designed to support families with complex
problems, including promoting family stability and reducing parental conflict. Funding
for the programme is not ring-fenced and we do not collect information about
spending on specific services such as marriage support. This funding flexibility allows
upper tier local authorities and their partners to decide how best to deliver the
programme in their own area, according to local need and priorities. Up to £920
million has been made available for the programme from 2015-2020. In addition, my
department has worked closely with DWP to make sure delivery of the programme is
coordinated with the Reducing Parental Conflict Programme, for which up to £39
million has been made available.
Mobile Homes: Council Tax
Mr Laurence Robertson: [251893]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will
bring forward legislative proposals to lower the level of council tax paid by residents of
park homes; and if he will make a statement.
Rishi Sunak:
The level of council tax which is payable is set by the local authorities in an area and
reflects the council tax band a home is in. Responsibility for setting the council tax
bands of homes in England, including park homes, rests with the Valuation Office
Agency who carry out their work independently of Ministers.
Rough Sleeping: Barnsley
Stephanie Peacock: [251384]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
proportion of the £25 million of funding recently announced by his Department to tackle
rough sleeping will be allocated to Barnsley.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
Barnsley did not bid for our Rapid Rehousing Pathway fund and has therefore not
been allocated any funding through this process.
However Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham have been jointly funded and
provisionally allocated £328,038 though our Rough Sleeping Initiative (RSI) for
2019/20. This funding will provide essential local services such as enhanced
outreach provision, additional prevention workers, mental health practitioners and a
rough sleeping co-coordinator.
The Government is committed to reducing homelessness and rough sleeping. No one
should ever have to sleep rough. That is why last summer we published the cross-
government Rough Sleeping Strategy. This sets out an ambitious £100 million
package to help people who sleep rough now, but also puts in place the structures
that will end rough sleeping once and for all. The Government has now committed
over £1.2 billion to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping over the spending review
period.
As part of this, in its first year, our Rough Sleeping Initiative provided over 1,750 new
bed spaces and 500 staff. This year we have expanded the RSI with investment of
£46 million for 246 areas – providing funding for an estimated 2,600 bed spaces and
750 staff. We are determined to work with all local authorities who are driven to
reducing the number of those sleeping rough.
Social Rented Housing: Disability
Dr Lisa Cameron: [250003]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
steps the Government is taking to help ensure that wheelchair-users do not have to wait
longer than non-wheelchair users for social homes.
Kit Malthouse:
The statutory ‘reasonable preference’ criteria already ensure that social housing is
prioritised for those who need to move on medical and welfare grounds, including
grounds relating to a disability. This will include wheel-chair users.
In the Social Housing Green Paper we set out our intention to undertake an evidence
collection exercise to help us understand how the allocations system is working and
whether it is striking the right balance between fairness, support and aspiration. We
are considering responses to the Green Paper and will respond in due course.
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
CDC
Preet Kaur Gill: [252021]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, with reference to the joint
response from the CDC group and DFID to the Independent Commission for Aid Impact’s
recommendations on CDC’s investments in low-income and fragile states of March 2019,
if he will publish the independent review of progress achieved against CDC’s strategic
objectives before the end of its current strategy cycle.
Harriett Baldwin:
DFID will commission an external assessment in 2020 to evaluate results and learn
lessons across all aspects of CDC’s current strategy (2017-2021). The review’s
findings will be published.
CDC: Staff
Preet Kaur Gill: [252025]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, with reference to the joint
response from the CDC Group and the Department for International Development to the
Independent Commission for Aid Impact’s recommendations on CDC’s investments in
low-income and fragile states, published in March 2019, how many full-time staff CDC
plan to have by the end of 2019 in each of its offices outside of the UK.
Harriett Baldwin:
CDC plans to have a total of 50 staff members based outside the UK by the end of
2019. A breakdown by country is given below.
BANGLADESH: 2
Ethiopia: 1
Egypt: 1
India: 27
Kenya: 5
Myanmar: 1
Nepal: 1
Nigeria: 3
Pakistan: 2
S Africa: 6
Zimbabwe: 1
Department for International Development: Bullying
Dr Matthew Offord: [251300]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what estimate he has made
of the number of cases of bullying and harassment that have been recorded against
managers in his Department in each of the last five years.
Harriett Baldwin:
The number of cases of bullying that have been recorded against managers in DFID
was less than 5 in each of the last 5 years. No cases of harassment were recorded
against DFID managers in 2014 to 2016. Less than 5 cases were recorded for both
2017 and 2018.
Developing Countries: Climate Change
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251909]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent assessment he
has made of the potential effect of climate change on his Department's aid (a) strategy
and (b) funding.
Harriett Baldwin:
Tackling climate change is a priority for the UK Government and for the Department
for International Development (DFID), and we are already providing significant
assistance to developing countries to help them deal with climate change. It is clear
however that the world is not on track to avoid dangerous climate change and
environmental damage. The Secretary of State wants to see what more we can do
with the UK’s aid budget and how we can encourage others to take more action. The
UN Climate Action Summit in September is a critical moment to increase global
ambition and I am pleased that the UK playing a leading role in shaping the agenda
on how to build resilience to cope with climate change already locked in.
East Africa: Storms
Stephen Twigg: [251884]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps the Government
is taking to support the recovery of (a) Mozambique, (b) Comoros and (c) Tanzania
following the effects of Cyclone Kenneth in those countries.
Harriett Baldwin:
The Government recognises the devastating impact of Cyclone Kenneth and has
moved quickly to respond. In Mozambique, which has suffered the worst effects, we
have supported the provision of emergency shelter, health and sanitation to the
worst-affected populations with an emergency grant of £3m; we are now assessing
options for further assistance. In Comoros the UK does not have a permanent
presence and we are therefore deferring to partners. The main platform for relief has
been the UN CERF Facility, to which the UK is the largest donor. In Tanzania the
cyclone had limited impact and we are not planning specific additional assistance.
Gambia: Overseas Aid
Grahame Morris: [251260]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what country-specific direct
support is his Department providing to The Gambia to (a) support economic development
and (b) strengthen democratic institutions in that country.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK’s bilateral country programme in The Gambia closed in 2012 and since then
we have supported the country through our funding to regional and thematic
programmes and multilateral partners. Our support for the economic development
agenda includes part-funding the IMF’s technical assistance to The Gambia on
revenue mobilisation, public financial management, monetary policy, financial sector
regulation and national statistics, as well as our core contributions to the World Bank
and African Development Bank’s work. On strengthening democratic institutions,
Westminster Foundation for Democracy and the Commonwealth Parliamentary
Association UK are delivering a programme of training and mentorship to the
Gambian National Assembly from UK funding.
South Asia: Disaster Relief
Joan Ryan: [251201]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what discussions he has
had with his counterparts in (a) India and (b) Bangladesh on support for regions affected
by Cyclone Fani.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK closely monitored Cyclone Fani as it advanced towards and hit both India
and Bangladesh. Using existing crisis mechanisms, both countries’ governments
have led on the preparedness and response. The UK has not received any formal
requests for support from either Government.
No discussions have been held between the International Development Secretary
and the Government of Bangladesh in response to this situation. The DFID
Bangladesh team was, however, in close contact with the Government during and
immediately following Cyclone Fani. Given the Government response and the limited
impact of the cyclone in Bangladesh, the Government did not seek funding or other
help from DFID.
Yemen: Cholera
Geraint Davies: [251195]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what support his
Department is providing to help victims of Yemen’s cholera epidemic.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK is deeply concerned about the rise in cholera in Yemen this year, with a
suspected 280,000 cases recorded between January and April 2019. In response,
the UK has disbursed £18 million last month to help UN agencies meet their most
urgent needs such as chlorination of water supply systems, distributing hygiene kits
and deploying expert teams to areas most at risk.
To help prepare for outbreaks of cholera, the UK led a joint Met Office, NASA and US
scientist team to accurately predict where the disease will spread to in Yemen. We
contributed 25% towards the cost of cholera vaccination campaigns which have
vaccinated over 2 million people in both Houthi and Government of Yemen controlled
areas to date.
Yemen: Humanitarian Aid
Geraint Davies: [251196]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps his Department
is taking to ensure that international humanitarian funds pledged to Yemen reach their
intended recipients.
Harriett Baldwin:
We are acutely aware of the difficult operating environment humanitarian
organisations face delivering life-saving assistance in Yemen. As a result we only
channel support through organisations with a strong record of delivering and
monitoring assistance, such as UN agencies and international NGOs.
To identify the most vulnerable, UN agencies use a range of tools such as household
level assessments. Some, like the World Food Programme, use technology such as
biometric verification to confirm that those most in need are being reached.
Through UK diplomatic channels we press authorities to facilitate aid delivery. This
can include getting visas issued or travel permission granted for certain areas.
Earlier this year the UK brought together heads of UN agencies and lead donors to
determine how to better coordinate on the ground to deliver the right interventions at
the right time to the most vulnerable. The Humanitarian Coordinator is holding UN
agencies to account to deliver this.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Department for International Trade: Advertising
David Simpson: [248634]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, how much his Department has
spent on advertising in each of the last two years.
George Hollingbery:
The total advertising expenditure by the department for each of the last two years is:
2018/19: £0
2017/18: £93,000
These figures exclude campaigns run as part of the Government’s GREAT
programme, recruitment advertising costs (not held centrally), and advertising costs
by UK Export Finance which is a separate legal entity to the Department for
International Trade.
Free Trade: Thailand
Andrew Rosindell: [249869]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent steps he has taken to
enable free trade with Thailand after the UK leaves the EU.
George Hollingbery:
The UK Government is working with the Government of Thailand to address existing
trade barriers between the two countries, and to consider options for strengthening
our bilateral trading relationship in the future.
The Secretary of State for International Trade visited Thailand from 4-6 April 2018. Dr
Fox discussed the UK’s future trading relationship with Thailand, emphasising the
importance of an open economy and transparent and predictable regulatory
environment.
Total trade in goods and services between the UK and Thailand was £6.3bn to the
end of 2018, an increase of 6.1% from 2017.
World Trade Organisation
Sir Nicholas Soames: [251191]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what (a) staff and (b) funding the
Government provides to the World Trade Organisation.
George Hollingbery:
The UK’s assessed contribution to the WTO for 2019 is 7,446,595 Swiss francs. The
UK also supports and funds several projects, such as those run by the International
Trade Centre (a joint agency of the WTO and UNCTAD), the WTO Trade Facilitation
Agreement Facility, the Enhanced Integrated Framework (a multi-donor trust fund)
and the WTO Standards and Trade Development Facility which all focus on helping
developing countries engage and participate in global trade. The UK funding for these
projects is £55.25 million between 2016 and 2023.
In addition, the United Kingdom is represented at the World Trade Organization by
Julian Braithwaite, our Ambassador and Permanent Representative in Geneva. The
Ambassador and his team play an active role in the work of the WTO, which is a
member-led organisation. Since July 2016 the Government has increased its
resourcing for the UK Mission to the UN and Other International Organisations in
Geneva.
JUSTICE
Age of Criminal Responsibility
Paul Farrelly: [251270]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the report by the Equality and
Human Rights Commission of 7 May 2019, Torture in the UK: update report, whether he
has plans to bring forward legislative proposals to raise the age of criminal responsibility
in England and Wales.
Edward Argar:
We have no current plans to change the age of criminal responsibility. We believe
that setting the age at 10 provides flexibility in dealing with young offenders and
allows for early intervention in a child’s life with the aim of preventing subsequent
offending. That is why there are a range of options available to the police to resolve
offences and put in place interventions to prevent further offending. Furthermore, the
particular needs of a child will be identified through assessment by the local multi-
agency youth offending team who can refer them on to other services for further
investigation and support.
Animal Welfare: Prosecutions
Jo Stevens: [252051]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many animal cruelty offences against
circus animals led to a prosecution in 2018.
Edward Argar:
Information as to whether or not an animal cruelty offence involved a circus animal
may be held on court record but to be able to identify these specific cases, which are
not held centrally, we would have to access individual court records which would be
of disproportionate cost.
Animal Welfare: Romford
Andrew Rosindell: [249875]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many animal cruelty (a) offences and (b)
convictions there were in Romford constituency in each year since 2012.
Robert Buckland:
The number of defendants prosecuted and offenders found guilty of offences under
Sections 4 to 8 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, in the Metropolitan Police Force area
and the North East London local justice area, from 2012 to 2017, can be viewed in
the table. Information specifically related to Romford is not available so the North
East London Local Justice Area (which includes Romford) has been provided.
Court proceedings and cautions data for 2018 is planned for publication on 16 May
2019.
Attachments:
1. Table [Copy of PQ 249875 table.xlsx]
Courts: Telephone Services
Yasmin Qureshi: [249923]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 29 March 2019 to
Question 235313 on Courts: Telephone Services, which helplines were included in that
figure for the number of calls received in February 2019; and how many calls were
directed to each helpline.
Edward Argar:
The helplines included were Social Security and Child Support, Divorce, Probate and
Single Justice Service. Calls answered on each line in February 2019 are as follows:
SOCIAL SECURITY AND CHILD SUPPORT 33,411
Divorce 14,454
Probate 1,538
Single Justice Service 3,848
Debt Collection
Emma Reynolds: [252114]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many bailiffs have been removed from the
certificated bailiff register in each of the last seven years.
Edward Argar:
Since the introduction of the Certification of Enforcement Agent Regulations in April
2014, the following numbers of enforcement agents have been removed from the
Register of Certificated Enforcement Agents:
2014 - 31
2015 - 91
2016 - 104
2017 - 74
2018 – 37
2019 (January -April) - 26
Reasons for cancelling a certificate include an agent leaving his or her employer,
ceasing to work as an enforcement agent or by a judicial order following a judgment
that they are not a fit and proper person to hold a certificate.
Judiciary: Females
Grant Shapps: [251972]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to increase the number
of women members of the judiciary.
Edward Argar:
The proportion of female court judges has increased by 5 percentage points since
2014, to 29% as at 1 April 2018, and for tribunal judges it has increased by 3
percentage points to 46%, over the same period.
We recognise that more progress is required and the Ministry of Justice has jointly
developed and is funding the pre-application judicial education programme (PAJE),
which launched on 24 April 2019. This will support and encourage lawyers interested
in a judicial career and targets underrepresented groups including women, to help
them prepare for a judicial career.
The MoJ continues to work closely with the Lord Chief Justice, Chair of the Judicial
Appointments Commission and other members of the Judicial Diversity Forum,
including the three legal professions, to implement its multi stranded plan to increase
judicial diversity.
Grant Shapps: [251974]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many members of the judicial bench in the
family division are women.
Edward Argar:
As of 1 April 2018, 58 judges appointed to the family division were women. This
amounts to 48% of the total number of judges in the family division.
Attachments:
1. Table [Copy of PQ251974 Data table 1.xlsx]
Ministry of Justice: Consultants
Yasmin Qureshi: [249996]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much his Department has spent from the
public purse on consultancies in each financial year between 2008 and 2011.
Yasmin Qureshi: [249997]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much his Department has spent from the
public purse on consultancies in each financial year between 2011 and 2014.
Yasmin Qureshi: [249998]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much his Department has spent from the
public purse on consultancies in each financial year between 2014 and 2016.
Edward Argar:
Consultancy spend data for the Ministry of Justice for the periods 2010-11 to 2016-17
is available on gov.uk and can be accessed using the following links.
2010-11 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2010-11
2011-12 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2011-12
2012-13 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2012-13
2013-14 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2013-to-2014
2014-15 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2014-to-2015
2015-16 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2015-to-2016
2016-17 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-justice-annual-
report-and-accounts-2016-to-2017
The data for the periods 2008-09 and 2009-10 is not centrally held.
Police Cautions
Hilary Benn: [251905]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what guidance is provided to police forces on
the procedure for administering cautions to ensure that the person involved understands
the legal consequences of accepting that caution.
Robert Buckland:
Out of Court Disposals (OOCDs) are measures which allow police to deal quickly and
proportionately with low-level offending without recourse to the courts. Simple and
Conditional Cautions exist currently for adult offenders.
Ministry of Justice published guidance on Simple Cautions for Adult Offenders, which
can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/simple-cautions-
guidance-for-police-and-prosecutors
Section 3 of the guidance states police officers must ensure the offender understands
the implications of accepting a simple caution, and consents to receiving the disposal
before it can be administered. The implications which must be explained are set out
in paragraphs 62-76 of the guidance. This includes the significance of the admission
of guilt and the retention and disclosure of criminal record information for future legal
proceedings or criminal record checks. Guidance also states police officers should
ensure offenders are given the opportunity to receive free and independent legal
advice before accepting a simple caution.
Similar points are made in the Ministry of Justice Guidance for Conditional Cautions
for Adult Offenders (also in Section 3 of the guidance) which can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-of-practice-for-adult-conditional-
cautions
Prison Officers: Riot Control Weapons
Imran Hussain: [249318]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many staff in each prison have been
trained to use PAVA spray.
Robert Buckland:
Comprehensive training has been provided to those staff permitted to carry PAVA,
which was piloted in four HMPPS prisons.
To date only staff in the pilot sites have been trained, the numbers of eligible staff
trained at each prison is available in the table below.
PRISON NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE STAFF TRAINED
Risley 245
Wealstun 163
Preston 229
Hull 314
Prison Sentences
Mr Kevan Jones: [250789]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people given a sentence of six
months or less, have previously served (a) 19 short sentences of six months or less, (b)
20 short sentences of six months or less, (c) 50 short sentences of six months or less and
(d) 100 short sentences of 6 months or less between 31 October 2017 and 1 September
2018.
Robert Buckland:
For those offenders sentenced to an immediate custodial sentence of six months or
less between 31st October 2017 and 1st September 2018:
a) 246 had 19 previous immediate custodial sentences of six months or less,
b) 223 had 20 previous immediate custodial sentences of six months or less,
c) 12 had 50 previous immediate custodial sentences of six months or less, and
d) 0 had 100 previous immediate custodial sentences of six months or less.
Prison Sentences: EU Countries
Paul Farrelly: [250470]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what comparative assessment he has made of
the levels of incarceration in the UK and other European countries; and what steps his
Department is taking to prevent unnecessary incarcerations.
Robert Buckland:
The Ministry of Justice does not publish information on rates of imprisonment in
England and Wales as part of its statistical releases.
However, the Department is a contributor to the Council of Europe’s “SPACE I”
annual report, which provides an overview of the use of custodial sanctions and
measures in the Member States of the Council of Europe, including rates of
imprisonment for each Member State. The latest report “ SPACE I – 2018 ” can be
found at: http://wp.unil.ch/space/space-i/annual-reports/
By law, courts in England and Wales are required to be satisfied that the offence
committed is so serious that only a custodial sentence can be justified. In the event a
custodial sentence is imposed, the law also requires that it should be for the shortest
time possible, commensurate with the seriousness of the offence.
We are exploring options to restrict the use of short custodial sentences, but have not
at this stage reached any conclusions. There is persuasive evidence showing that
they do not work in terms of rehabilitation and helping some offenders turn their
backs on crime, and that community sentences, in certain circumstances, are actually
more effective in reducing reoffending. The MoJ study ‘The impact of short custodial
sentences, community orders and suspended sentence orders on re-offending’
published in 2015 found that over a 1-year follow up period, a higher proportion of
people re-offended having been sentenced to custody of under 12 months without
supervision on release than other similar people given community orders.
Prisoners' Release: Housing
Jo Stevens: [251367]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what number and proportion of prisoners
released did not have accommodation to go to in each year since 2010.
Robert Buckland:
The information could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost. While the exact
information could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost, some of the data is
available in part, which is detailed below. It is vital that everyone leaving prison has
somewhere safe and secure to live. Having somewhere stable to live acts as a
platform for ex-offenders to be able to access the services and support needed to
turn their back on crime for good. Published statistics for 2017/18 showing the
accommodation status for all offenders can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-performance-quarterly-mi-
update-to-march-2018
As part of the Government initiative to reduce and ultimately eliminate rough sleeping
across England, we are investing up to £6.4 million over two years in a pilot scheme
to help ex-offenders into accommodation from three prisons, namely Bristol,
Pentonville and Leeds. The pilots will focus on male prisoners who have served
shorter sentences, who have been identified as having a risk of homelessness.
Following a mobilisation period, we expect services to commence in Summer of this
year. This is a concrete step in our commitment to tackling rough sleeping.
Prisons: Contracts
Richard Burgon: [251408]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 16 April 2019 to
Question 243531 on Prisons: Contracts, and with reference to House Commons Library
Deposited Paper, DEP2019-0487, Model for Operational Delivery: New Resettlement
Prisons, Version 1.8, April 2019, if he will publish all previous versions of that document
which have been made available to potential private prison contractors.
Robert Buckland:
The document placed in the house library pursuant to question 243531 is the most
recent and up to date version of the Model for Operational Delivery. It can be used by
bidders to develop their bids as part of the mini competition for Wellingborough. We
do not consider it useful to publish all previous versions of this document and do not
intend to do so.
Probation: Standards
Jo Stevens: [251368]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of
the overall performance of probation services since the part-privatisation of those
services in 2014.
Robert Buckland:
All probation providers are now assessed on an annual basis by HM Inspectorate of
Probation. In addition, HM Prison and Probation Service runs regular, targeted
operational audits to assess performance. We take action on any performance
concerns highlighted. Quarterly performance statistics are also available, at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-
statistics#community-performance-statistics
We have been clear that probation services need to improve. While the National
Probation Service is performing well, the performance of CRCs has too often been
disappointing, for a variety of reasons.
Last year, we announced our decision to end current Community Rehabilitation
Company (CRC) contracts early. Following this, we launched a consultation,
Strengthening Probation, Building Confidence, and engaged with stakeholders and
the market on the future of the probation system.
We will set out detailed plans for the future of probation services shortly.
Wales Office: Contracts
Chris Ruane: [251246]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 7 May 2019 to
Question 249229 on Wales Office: Contracts, how many contracts awarded by his
Department on behalf of the Wales Office were awarded to companies based in (a)
Wales, (b) the UK, (c) the EU and (d) the rest of the world in each of the last three years.
Edward Argar:
The information requested could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost.
Women's Centres: Wales
Chris Elmore: [249968]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he has had with the Welsh
Government on expanding the provision of women's centres in Wales.
Chris Elmore: [249970]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what criteria his Department plans to use to
decide the locations of additional women's centres.
Chris Elmore: [249971]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the timescale is for opening additional
women's centres in the UK.
Chris Elmore: [249974]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he has had with (a) the Welsh
Local Government Association and (b) local authorities in Wales on establishing a
women's centre in their authority area.
Edward Argar:
As part of the Female Offender Strategy, we are committed to working with local and
national partners to develop a ‘Residential Women’s Centre’ pilot in at least five sites
across England and Wales. We have recently concluded our first phase of
consultation with stakeholders, partners and providers. This has included close
working with colleagues across Welsh government on any Wales-specific
implications and requirements, as well as engagement with providers of women’s
services in Wales. The Welsh Government also has representation on our Advisory
Board for Female Offenders, which scrutinises the work of the Female Offender
programme and the implementation of the Female Offender Strategy.
Whilst no decisions regarding the locations of the Residential Women’s Centre pilot
have been made, we appreciate the need to ensure adequate provision of women’s
support services in Wales. I have discussed this issue with Jane Hutt AM, Deputy
Minister and Chief Whip, and look forward to continuing discussions with our Welsh
partners on how best to achieve this.
HMPPS in Wales have also been working with colleagues in Welsh Government to
develop a draft blueprint for justice services for women that reflects the landscape in
Wales. This will outline a vision to enable devolved and non-devolved services to
work together to deliver efficient and effective services that will deliver positive
outcomes for individuals and the community and considers alternatives to custody for
women in Wales, including women’s centres.
The blueprint development work has been discussed with the All Wales Criminal
Justice Board, which includes Welsh Local Government Association representation.
Young Offenders: Criminal Proceedings
Emma Reynolds: [252115]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average length of time between a
young offender being charged and their (a) trial if they have pleaded not guilty and (b)
sentencing hearing where they have pleaded guilty has been in each year since 2010.
Edward Argar:
Data available does not allow the question to be answered with two simple measures
as offences can be sentenced at either the Youth court (magistrates’) or Crown court.
The attached tables provide figures on the average (both mean and median) number
of days from:
• Charge to start of trial at Youth (magistrate’s) court, for youths pleading not guilty
(Table A)
• Charge to main hearing at Crown Court, for youths pleading not guilty (Table B)
• Charge to completion for Youth (magistrates’) court cases for youths pleading
guilty (Table C)
• Charge to main hearing at Crown Court, for youths pleading guilty (Table D)
Attachments:
1. Table [Copy of Copy of PQ 252115 v1 (005) (004).xlsx]
NORTHERN IRELAND
Northern Ireland Office: Bullying
Dr Matthew Offord: [252032]
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what estimate she has made of the
number of cases of bullying and harassment that have been recorded against managers
in her Department in each of the last five years.
John Penrose:
Due to there being fewer than five cases of bullying and harassment recorded against
managers in my Department in the last five years, figures cannot be provided in order
to protect the privacy and identity of individuals concerned.
PRIME MINISTER
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Departmental Responsibilities
Chris Ruane: [251915]
To ask the Prime Minister, when she plans to appoint a new Minister of State for the
Middle East and North Africa.
Mrs Theresa May:
My Honourable Friend the Member for South West Wiltshire (Dr Andrew Murrison
MP) has been appointed as a Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth
Office and the Department for International Development.
TRANSPORT
Abellio Group and Arriva
Andy McDonald: [250026]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to
Question 243472 on Abellio Group, what assurances his Department has received from
owning groups (a) Abellio and (b) Arriva that any sale of their UK government rail
contracts will ensure future owners have the capacity to honour all commitments
including parent company guarantees and performance bonds.
Andrew Jones:
The ‘Change of Control’ provisions in the Franchise Agreement give the Secretary of
State unlimited right to reject any sale of a franchise such as those owned by Abellio
and Arriva. In deciding whether to approve such a sale, the Secretary of State would
consider the arrangements in place for securing the same or improved parent
company guarantees and performance bond arrangements as currently exist. This
consideration would include the financial standing of the new owning group and other
elements of their capacity to honour existing commitments.
Aviation: Global Positioning System
Grant Shapps: [251274]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what guidance his Department provides to
aerodromes on the implementation of GPS approaches.
Jesse Norman:
Global Navigation Satellite System approaches need to be approved by the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA). The CAA will provide guidance to aerodromes that are
considering the implementation of such approaches. In particular the CAA has
produced a framework for the safety cases which need to be produced as part of the
approval process.
Grant Shapps: [251275]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with the Civil
Aviation Authority on the roll-out of GPS technology at aerodromes.
Jesse Norman:
The Government has regular discussions with the Civil Aviation Authority concerning
the progress of airspace modernisation, and these have included updates on
airspace change proposals designed to implement Global Satellite Navigation
System approaches at aerodromes.
Aviation: Safety
Mr Clive Betts: [249826]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 18 April 2019 to
Question 245611 on Aircraft: Accidents, when (a) he and (b) his ministerial colleagues
last had discussions with the football sector on safety and compliance issues in respect of
commercial aircraft flights.
Jesse Norman:
The Secretary of State and his ministerial colleagues have not had discussions with
representatives of the football industry on safety and compliance issues in respect of
commercial air flights.
Aviation: Training
Grant Shapps: [251276]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps are being taken to ensure that
pilot training is being adapted to incorporate (a) GPS approaches and (b) other new
technologies.
Jesse Norman:
Global Navigation Satellite System approaches are one element of performance
based navigation (PBN). An amendment to EU Regulation 1178/2011 (the Aircrew
Regulation), which came into force in 2018, provides that pilots may only fly in
accordance with PBN procedures if they hold an instrument rating with PBN
privileges. The Aircrew Regulation establishes the training required to obtain PBN
privileges. From 25 August 2020, all applicants for an instrument rating will be
required to have undertaken PBN training.
Training requirements will be reviewed as and when the carriage and use of other
new technologies are mandated. In addition, the Civil Aviation Authority is continuing
to engage with the European Aviation Safety Agency to expand training on the use of
satellite based technology to help reduce airspace infringements.
Bramley Station: CCTV
Rachel Reeves: [252020]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make representations to Northern
Rail to install CCTV equipment at Bramley Station in Leeds in response to reports of
increased criminal activity around that station.
Andrew Jones:
There is a CCTV camera already installed at Bramley station which now covers the
cycle storage, the approach and the car park.
East Coast Railway Line
Andy McDonald: [250009]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will set out the (a) revenue, (b) growth
and (c) investment on the East Coast mainline by successive operators of the route in (i)
2015, (ii) 2016, (iii) 2017 and (iv) 2018.
Andrew Jones:
The information requested for Virgin Trains East Coast can be found in the annual
reports published on the Stagecoach website. I attach the link for reference:
https://www.stagecoach.com/investors/financial-analysis/reports/2018.aspx
The part year VTEC accounts for the period 1 April 2018 to 24 June 2018 are due to
be published later this year.
The audited annual accounts for LNER from 24 June 2018 to 31 March 2019 will also
be published later this year.
East Midlands Rail Franchise
Andy McDonald: [250032]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether all three bids for the East Midlands
franchise were non-compliant.
Andrew Jones:
It was a fair, open competition and Abellio provided the best bid for passengers, in
which it demonstrated that it will not only meet but exceed the Department’s
specifications
In complex procurement processes such as this, it is a matter of course that there
may be small technical non-compliances. These include, for example, incorrect font
sizes or submitting bids in the wrong format. This does not constitute a material non-
compliance which would affect the compliance of the bid as a whole.
Chris Williamson: [250454]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reasons the East Midlands franchise
was awarded to Abellio until 2027 before the conclusion of the Williams review.
Andrew Jones:
The government will publish a White Paper setting out how we will implement the
Review’s recommendations in the autumn. Reform will start as early as 2020. This
does not prevent us taking every opportunity in the short term to improve passengers’
experience.
We considered on a case-by-case basis whether to continue with the current
franchise competitions and concluded that awarding the East Midlands franchise now
would be in the best interests of passengers and taxpayers and would allow planned
passenger benefits, such as new trains, to be delivered at the earliest opportunity.
East Midlands Trains: Pensions
Andy McDonald: [250027]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to Answer of 10 April 2019 to
Question 243470, what estimate has he made of the amount of pension risk and liability
the Government will be required to share on the East Midlands Trains as a result of the
next actuarial valuation of the Railway Pension Scheme taking place December 2019.
Andrew Jones:
The 2019 actuarial valuation of the East Midlands section of the Railways Pension
Scheme will be performed by the Scheme Actuary, and the outcome will depend on
the assumptions used. The Department has taken advice from the Government
Actuary’s Department on the potential range of future valuation outcomes.
East-West Rail Link
Layla Moran: [251432]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the choice of preferred route for the
Oxford-Cambridge Expressway should follow the ecological mitigation hierarchy used (a)
by local authorities in preparing local plans and (b) in deciding planning applications in
line with the National Planning Policy Framework.
Jesse Norman:
The Government take the potential environmental impacts of the Oxford Cambridge
Expressway seriously. The National Planning Policy Framework is designed for the
local authority-led Town and Country Planning system, which usually deals with much
smaller developments. As a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project, the Oxford
Cambridge Expressway must comply with the (more extensive) requirements of the
National Networks National Policy Statement, which are specifically designed to
ensure that the impacts of major infrastructure are properly considered and mitigated.
Motor Vehicles: Exhaust Emissions
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [252124]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to
encourage more people to use low emission vehicles.
Jesse Norman:
The Government’s mission is to put the UK at the forefront of the design and
manufacturing of zero emission vehicles, and for all new cars and vans to be
effectively zero emission by 2040. The Office for Low Emission Vehicles (OLEV) has
a range of grant-funded schemes to assist with the cost of purchasing ultra low and
zero emission vehicles and the installation of charging infrastructure in motorists’
homes, on residential streets, at work places, car parks and the wider public estate.
Motorists of zero and ultra low emission vehicle also benefit from a tax regime that
rewards the cleanest vehicles. The Government is investing nearly £1.5bn between
April 2015 and March 2021, with grants available for plug in vehicles and schemes to
support chargepoint infrastructure. The Road to Zero Strategy, published in July last
year, sets out a clear pathway to zero emissions, to give clarity and certainty to both
industry and motorists.
Northern: Standards
Andy McDonald: [250014]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when he plans respond to the
recommendations of Richard George on the resilience of the northern rail network; and
what plans he has to implement those recommendations.
Andrew Jones:
I recently met with Richard George to discuss his report and recommendations.
Decisions on the next steps will be taken in partnership with Transport for the North
and the industry.
Public Transport: Disability
Paul Farrelly: [251227]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to
ensure that public transportation meets the needs of disabled people in towns and cities.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The Government is committed to ensuring disabled people, including those with less
visible disabilities such as autism, have the same access to transport and
opportunities to travel as everyone else.
In July 2018 the Department published the Inclusive Transport Strategy. Its ambition
is to create a transport system that provides equal access for disabled people by
2030. It is ambitious and comprehensive, and sets a clear direction of travel, helping
to create a society that works for all and will enable disabled people in our towns and
cities to travel confidently, easily and without extra cost. The Department is making
good progress delivering the many commitments set out in the Strategy, and will be
reporting to Parliament on this in the summer.
Rail Delivery Group: Finance
Andy McDonald: [250008]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate he has made of the financial
contribution of Network Rail to the Rail Delivery Group in each year for which figures are
available.
Andrew Jones:
Network Rail’s contributions to the Rail Delivery Group is presented in the table
below:
RDG 18/19 £ 17/18 £ 16/17 £ 15/16 £ 14/15 £
3,978,375 3,760,000 5,481,932 2,443,500 2,039,000
Railway Signals: Repairs and Maintenance
Andy McDonald: [250011]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate his Department has made of
the amount of signalling which needs to be renewed across the rail network in (a) Control
Period 7, (b) Control Period 8 and (c) Control Period 9; and what estimate he has made
of the cost of those renewals.
Andrew Jones:
In the first instance it is for Network Rail to consider what signalling renewals are
required across the rail network and provide advice to Government and the Office of
Rail and Road (ORR). The ORR will scrutinise Network Rail’s proposals and provide
assurance on their cost and deliverability as part of its statutory five-yearly periodic
reviews of Network Rail’s outputs and funding.
Railways: Compensation
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [252123]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department plans on requiring all
train operators to introduce automatic compensation for rail delays.
Andrew Jones:
The Department requires operators of new franchises to provide automated Delay
Repay compensation processes that make claiming swift and simple and is working
with the rail industry and the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) to deliver more
automated claims processes across all DfT-let franchises. Since announcing ‘one-
click’ compensation in October 2018, the Government has introduced a requirement
for new franchises to introduce simple one-click automated claims systems, available
via smartphones and smartcard registration, to make it easier for passengers to claim
compensation when they have suffered delays. Automated claims processing
benefits a broad spectrum of rail passengers whereas automatic compensation
schemes only benefit passengers with specific ticket types.
Railways: Franchises
Andy McDonald: [249982]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent discussions the Department for
Transport's Operator of the last Resort has had with existing rail franchise operators on
potential changes of ownership of those franchises.
Andrew Jones:
The Department monitors all Train Operating Companies closely to ensure delivery of
services for passengers, and is in regular discussions with all Train Operators as part
of its normal business.
Andy McDonald: [250029]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to
Question 243471 on Abellio Group, what weighting his Department gives to competition
considerations and the wider impact on competition across the rail and wider transport
industry in the (a) development, (b) design and (c) award of rail franchises.
Andrew Jones:
Issues relating to market competition arising from franchise awards are a matter for
the winning bidder and the Competition and Markets Authority. As a result, the
Department does not weight competition considerations in the development, design
or award of rail franchises – the Department focuses on initiatives which will deliver
real benefits to passengers, such as additional services, greater capacity and
improvements in the customer experience.
Andy McDonald: [250033]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reasons his Department (a)
disqualified Stagecoach from the East Midlands, South Eastern and West Coast
Partnership rail franchise competitions on 1 April 2019 and (b) did not inform that
company of that decision until 9 April 2019.
Andrew Jones:
Entities in which Stagecoach were participating were disqualified from the East
Midlands, West Coast Partnership and South Eastern competitions because they
chose to submit bids which were not compliant with the requirements of the
Instructions To Tender for each competition. Stagecoach were informed of the
disqualification as soon as possible after the decision was confirmed.
Railways: Greater London
Andy McDonald: [250025]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer 9 April 2019 to
Question 241018 on Durham Coast Railway Line, what assessment he has made of the
implications of the reorganisation of Network Rail on those parts of the rail network under
the control of the Mayor of London and Transport for London.
Andrew Jones:
The Department for Transport welcomes Network Rail’s Putting Passengers First
programme and Andrew Haines’ commitment to ensuring that rail works for
passengers and freight customers.
The Department is continuing to engage with Network Rail as they implement the
programme. Network Rail is responsible for engaging all relevant stakeholders in the
implementation phase.
Railways: Stoke on Trent
Paul Farrelly: [249852]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 29 April 2019 to
Question 246956 on Transport: Stoke-on-Trent, if he will make an assessment of the
adequacy of the frequency of daily train services between Stoke-on-Trent and London.
Andrew Jones:
The West Coast Partnership is due to be awarded shortly and as per the ITT, the
current Inter City West Coast service between London Euston and Stoke on Trent
has been protected as a minimum requirement.
The incoming franchisee will also be responsible for the implementation of a
timetable recast associated with the introduction of HS2 services, which will involve
consultation with relevant stakeholders for the provision of future services.
There is no change to the overall number of direct LNR trains between Stoke-on-
Trent and London Euston in the forthcoming timetable change from 20 May 2019.
Roads: Safety
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [252125]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department plans to reintroduce
national road safety targets.
Jesse Norman:
The Department has no current plans to reintroduce national road safety targets.
There is no robust academic evidence to indicate that the setting of any targets in the
UK would contribute to progress in road casualty reduction. In fact there has been a
stalling of progress in road casualty reductions across many economically advanced
countries, including in countries with targets (e.g. Sweden and the Netherlands).
The 2015 Road Safety statement sets out the Department for Transport’s overall
principles and priorities in relation to British road safety. Local authorities, the police
and other bodies are free to set their own road safety targets if they wish.
Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern Rail Franchise
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [249926]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department monitors the number
of trains services without an on-board supervisor on the Southern Rail franchise.
Andrew Jones:
The Department does not monitor these figures as a matter of course. We do,
however, hold recent figures for the proportion of Southern services that have run
without an on-board supervisor since the role was introduced in January 2017. These
figures demonstrate that the percentage of services running without an on-board
supervisor is very low and is decreasing over time.
Southern are only able to run services without an on-board supervisor in exceptional
circumstances. This reduces the disruption to passengers, as if a conductor was due
to work on these services, but is then unavailable, then they would have had to be
cancelled.
West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise: Pensions
Andy McDonald: [249985]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether First Group has met his
Department's criteria on railway pensions as a shortlisted bidder for the West Coast
Partnership rail franchise.
Andrew Jones:
The Department does not comment on a live competition. All bids received for any
franchise competition are evaluated against the requirements and instructions set out
in the relevant Invitation To Tender.
TREASURY
101 Calls: Fees and Charges
Steve McCabe: [251216]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department receives any money
from the 15 pence service charge on calls to the non-emergency police hotline 101.
Mel Stride:
VAT is applied at the standard rate of 20% to all telephone service call charges.
Cash Dispensing: Fees and Charges
Catherine West: [250016]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to ensure the continued
provision of free cash withdrawals at ATMs.
John Glen:
The Government-established Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) is closely
monitoring developments in ATM provision. The PSR regulates LINK, the scheme
which runs the UK’s ATM network, and has used its powers to hold LINK to account
over LINK’s commitments to preserve the broad geographic spread of the ATM
network.
The PSR has set out requirements of LINK, including that any cuts to interchange
fees (the fees which fund free-to-use ATMs) must be incremental, with action taken
by LINK where the impact is not as expected. Having implemented two of the four
planned incremental reductions to the interchange fee, LINK has cancelled the third
reduction and put on hold the fourth. The PSR welcomed these adjustments, having
stated that LINK must carefully review its decisions on interchange fees to reflect
changing market conditions. These adjustments gave the PSR further assurances
that LINK is committed to making sure communities do not lose their free-to-use
ATMs.
LINK has put in place specific arrangements to protect free-to-use ATMs more than 1
kilometre away from the next nearest free-to-use ATM. LINK has also enhanced its
Financial Inclusion Programme by tripling the funding available to ATMs in the most
deprived areas of the UK and undertaken new financial support for ATMs in remote
and deprived areas.
Child Benefit: British Nationals Abroad
Frank Field: [249899]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to the
public purse of child benefit paid for children who do not reside in the UK; how many such
children there were; and in which countries those children resided in the most recent
financial year for which data are available.
Mel Stride:
Total Child Benefit payments in 2018-19 amounted to £11.6 billion. It is estimated
that approximately £15 million was paid for children resident in another EEA country
or Switzerland. The number of children these payments relate to, broken down by the
country they reside in, is provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Estimated number of children for whom Child Benefit is received where
European Community regulations apply, as at February 2019
Country Number of children
Austria 10
Belgium 40
Bulgaria 415
Croatia 45
Cyprus 40
Czech Republic 165
Denmark 20
Estonia 35
Finland 25
France 605
Germany 165
Greece 55
Hungary 150
Iceland 5
Italy 170
Latvia 700
Liechtenstein -
Lithuania 790
Luxembourg 10
Malta 25
Norway 40
Poland 10,975
Portugal 230
Republic of Ireland 1,945
Romania 1,000
Slovakia 575
Slovenia -
Spain 625
Sweden 30
Switzerland 20
The Netherlands 215
Total 19,120
Footnote: Figures have been rounded to the nearest 5. Figures under 5 have been
suppressed and shown as ‘-’.
Community Land Trusts: Capital Gains Tax
Bill Wiggin: [249884]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to grant full Capital Gains Tax
relief for land sales to a Community Land Trust for affordable homes.
Mel Stride:
The Government is committed to improving the supply of affordable homes. Since
2010, we have increased housing supply by over 1.3 million homes, including
407,000 affordable homes.
We do not currently have plans to grant full Capital Gains Tax relief for land sales to a
Community Land Trust. The Government considers that the extent to which a Capital
Gains Tax relief for land sales to a Community Land Trust would incentivise such
behaviour is uncertain. Tax reliefs have an Exchequer cost, and in contemplating
such a relief the Government must consider the potential deadweight cost of any
benefit going to people who would have sold the land to a Community Land Trust
anyway.
Credit Unions
Dr David Drew: [251214]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to support the (a)
development and (b) governance of credit unions.
John Glen:
The government remains committed to supporting credit unions, which provide vital
services to financially under-served communities and contribute to the diversity of the
UK’s financial services sector.
At Autumn Budget 2018, the Chancellor announced a two-year pilot of a new prize-
linked savings scheme offered through credit unions. This will support the credit
union sector through increased membership, awareness and deposits, as well as
encouraging participants to build up savings to help them cope with financial shocks.
At Autumn Budget 2018 the Chancellor also announced a new £2 million challenge
fund to promote innovative solutions from the UK’s Fintech sector to address
challenges faced by social and community lenders, including credit unions.
This Government believes improving governance in the sector is best led by the
sector itself, and supports the work of industry bodies in this regard.
Chris Stephens: [251439]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answers of 29 April 2019
Questions 246542, 246543 and 246544 on Credit Unions, what discussions he has had
with the Prudential Regulation Authority on changing capital requirements for credit
unions.
Chris Stephens: [251440]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answers of 29 April 2019
Questions 246542, 246543 and 246544 on Credit Unions, whether it is his Department's
policy to support the Prudential Regulation Authority on decisions to change the capital
requirements for credit unions.
John Glen:
Capital requirements for credit unions are set by the Prudential Regulation Authority
(PRA), in line with their mandate to promote the safety and soundness of firms. The
PRA is independent from government and is responsible for ensuring the credit union
sector is effectively regulated and financially stable.
I have regular meetings with the PRA to discuss a range of ongoing policy issues,
including in relation to credit unions.
The government remains committed to supporting credit unions, which provide vital
services to financially under-served communities and contribute to the diversity of the
UK’s financial services sector. Credit union membership and assets continue to grow,
with membership passing 2 million for the first time in 2018 and total assets growing
to over £3.3 billion.
Employment Agencies: Tax Avoidance
Anneliese Dodds: [252056]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of
the level of involvement of recruitment agencies in disguised remuneration loans.
Anneliese Dodds: [252057]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many recruitment agencies have been
implicated in loan charge cases.
Mel Stride:
DR schemes are contrived arrangements that pay loans in place of ordinary
remuneration, usually through an offshore trust, with the sole purpose of avoiding
income tax and National Insurance contributions. The loans are provided on terms
that mean they are not repaid in practice, so they are no different to normal income
and are, and always have been, taxable.
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will always seek payment of the loan charge
from employers in the first instance. It is only where HMRC cannot reasonably collect
from the employer, for example where the employer is no longer in existence or is
based offshore, that the individual will be liable to pay the tax due. Around 75% of
overall yield from the measure is expected to come from employers.
Only an employer, or umbrella company established for the purpose, can originate a
DR scheme. Recruitment agencies match individuals with engagers who require their
labour. In most cases recruitment agencies do not employ the individual in question.
Where a recruitment agency used a DR scheme to reward their employees they will
be liable to pay the loan charge in the first instance.
Fuels: Excise Duties
Daniel Zeichner: [251386]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the
environmental impact of freezing fuel duty since 2010.
Robert Jenrick:
The consumption of fuel is highly price inelastic. Therefore, fuel duty freezes only
have a marginal impact on the amount of fuel purchased, and therefore limited impact
on emissions.
Households spend a significant amount of their total spending on transport fuels, and
fuel costs are a major factor in helping the competitiveness of British businesses.
Duty on fuel remains at 57.95ppl. The government is also taking action to reduce
emissions and improve air quality through Vehicle Excise Duty and the Company Car
Tax system.
Income Tax
Fiona Bruce: [251262]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the annual cost of recognising family
responsibility in the income tax system has been in each financial year since 2010.
Mel Stride:
The Government supports families in a number of ways, including through the tax
and welfare systems.
The income tax system does this through various allowances including the married
couples allowance and marriage allowance, and by providing tax reliefs for childcare.
The Government also supports families through increasing tax thresholds including
increasing the Personal Allowance to £12,500 for 2019 to 2020.
The annual costs of most of these types of support in each financial year since 2010
have been set out in various HMRC publications.
Mortgages
Jonathan Reynolds: [249972]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Government has taken to
improve access to the mortgage market for underserved groups.
Jonathan Reynolds: [249973]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Government is taking to improve
access to the mortgage market for (a) small business owners, (b) self-employed people
and (c) people working in the gig economy.
John Glen:
The Government is committed to maintaining an accessible mortgage market. The
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is responsible for regulating the market and
protecting consumers, found in their Mortgage Market Study, published March 2019,
that the market is working well and that consumers have access to mortgages that
are suitable and affordable.
The FCA recognises that lenders should have flexibility to decide what type of
evidence of income they can accept from customers, including those who are self-
employed or have alternative sources of income.
Many lenders also offer custom mortgage products designed for contractors or the
self-employed. These commonly include features designed to account for income
volatility, such as the ability to make capital repayments at any time, or income
assessments using averaged figures to smooth out monthly variations.
Beyond the FCA’s regulations, decisions around the type and availability of mortgage
products are commercial decisions for lenders, and the Government does not seek to
intervene in these decisions.
Public Sector: Tax Avoidance
Anneliese Dodds: [252058]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department is undertaking a review
of internal (a) advice and (b) procedures on public sector organisations engaging in tax
avoidance schemes.
Mel Stride:
HMRC is committed to tackling tax avoidance and evasion at all levels to ensure that
everyone, no matter who they are, pays the right amount of tax at the right time. It
keeps its policies under constant review, including those affecting public sector
bodies. HMRC works closely with public bodies to support them with their tax affairs
and ensure they pay the right amount.
Shops: Payment Methods
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251912]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of
the effect of cashless shops on (a) low-income people and (b) poorer communities.
John Glen:
The Treasury has not made a specific assessment of the effect of cashless shops on
(a) low-income people and (b) poorer communities.
However, last year the Government initiated a discussion on payment methods
through a Call for Evidence on Cash and Digital Payments in the New Economy. This
sought to gather evidence on how changing preferences for cash and digital
payments impact on different sectors, regions and demographics. A wide range of
evidence was collected, including on the changing levels of cash usage, and a formal
summary of responses was published in May 2019.
The response set out the Government’s commitment to supporting digital payments,
whilst safeguarding access to cash for those who need it. The Government is
engaging, and will continue to engage, with the regulators and industry on this
important topic.
Social Security Benefits
Fiona Bruce: [251263]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the annual cost of recognising family
responsibility in the welfare system has been in each financial year since 2010.
Elizabeth Truss:
The Government supports families in a number of ways, including through the welfare
system.
For instance, every year the Government spends more than £11bn on Child Benefit
in recognition of the costs to families of raising children. In addition to this, at the last
Budget, the Chancellor put an additional £1.7bn per year into the Universal Credit
Work Allowances for families with children and those where someone has a disability.
UK Asset Resolution
Gordon Marsden: [251931]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the adequacy
of the safeguards and mechanisms put in place by his Department and the Financial
Conduct Authority between 2012 and 2018 in respect of the sale of UKAR loans to
ensure that loan holders were able to transfer or get better terms from other regulated
lenders instead of those companies to whom AKAR had sold their loans.
Gordon Marsden: [251932]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment (a) his Department and (b) the
Financial Conduct Authority have made of the legal responsibility of TSB and other banks
whose organisation or subsidiary have bought loans from UKAR to allow people who had
such loans but are not their customers to transfer or switch to another mortgage loan
provider.
Gordon Marsden: [251933]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April 2019 to
Question 243349, if he will publish the details of the proportion of Northern Rock
mortgage holders' loans that were sold to (a) inactive and (b) unregulated lenders
between 2011 and 2018.
Gordon Marsden: [251934]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions (a) he and (b) Ministers of his
Department have had with the Financial Conduct Authority on whether Cerberus Capital
Management is a fit and proper organisation to purchase mortgage loans from UK banks
and his Department via UKAR.
John Glen:
Customers have always been protected in UKAR asset sales. The government and
UKAR consider the fair treatment of customers a priority for all asset sales and have
always included customer protections in line with or that exceeded industry best
practice for transactions of this nature.
Bidders were required to agree to customer protections, which were non-negotiable,
before the bids were assessed on price. These protections included: adherence to
the Financial Conduct Authority’s principle of Treating Customers Fairly; where
customers were on Standard Variable Rate mortgages, purchasers were restricted in
the changes they could make to the Standard Variable Rate for 12 months; and,
mortgage books that were sold had to be administered by Financial Conduct
Authority regulated companies, and no changes could be made to the terms and
conditions of any of the loans that had been sold.
In addition to requiring bidders to agree to the protections outlined above, UKAR
undertake due diligence on bidders, their proposed servicers and legal title holders of
the loans to ensure that they have the necessary policies, procedures and
governance in place to treat customers fairly.
The details of all NRAM mortgage sales can be found on gov.uk. Both active and
non-active lenders are invited to participate in UKAR sales to ensure a competitive
process. In relation to the latest asset sale, UKAR’s advisors proactively invited the
top 25 active lenders to participate. Notwithstanding this, UKAR have not received a
bid from an active lender that covered the full portfolio of assets being sold.
Whether to offer customers new mortgage products is a commercial decision for
lenders and government does not intervene in individual cases.
That said, the government welcomes the voluntary agreement entered into last year
by UK Finance working with the FCA. Under this agreement, 59 authorised lenders
representing 93 per cent of the UK’s residential mortgage market have agreed
common standards to help existing borrowers on reversion rates who are up-to-date
with repayments but, because of stricter affordability criteria, are currently ineligible,
to move to an alternative product provided by their lender, where said lender is able
to offer alternative products.
HM Treasury has also worked closely with the FCA on their Mortgages Market Study
and their planned changes to affordability assessments. These changes remove the
regulatory barriers which previously might have prevented borrowers from accessing
new mortgage deals, regardless of whether they are with active or inactive lenders.
HM Treasury will continue to work closely with the FCA once the changes to their
rules are implemented, to monitor the impact this will have on the market.
WALES
Wales Office: Bullying
Dr Matthew Offord: [252031]
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, what estimate he has made of the number of
cases of bullying and harassment that have been recorded against managers in his
Department in each of the last five years.
Kevin Foster:
The Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (OSSW) has recorded no cases of
bullying or harassment in the last five years.
The Office is committed to ensuring staff are treated with dignity and respect, and
that any concerns raised by staff are listened to and dealt with appropriately. We
have a zero tolerance approach to bullying and harassment.
WORK AND PENSIONS
Children: Maintenance
Frank Field: [249882]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 29 April
2019 to Question 246453, on Children: Maintenance, how many times each of the
powers listed in the Answer have been used.
Will Quince:
We do not keep information on the number of times Financial Investigation Unit (FIU)
request information from financial institutions to check the accuracy of information.
Regarding the number of times Financial Investigation Unit (FIU) will seek to
prosecute or forward to HMRC for fraud action. I can confirm there has been one
prosecution in 2019 with 3 other cases are being investigated by Crown Prosecution
Service. The arrangements with HMRC to provide them with information regarding
Child Maintenance Group investigations has been finalised and the first transfer of
data will occur in mid May.
Department for Work and Pensions: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249904]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many civil servants in her
Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the European Union
and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three years.
Will Quince:
This information can only be provided at disproportionate cost.
The Department for Work and Pension has worked closely with the Department for
Exiting the European Union and other Government Departments as part of the UK’s
preparations to exit the EU. The Department has prepared for all eventualities
including no deal. Preparations have been undertaken by staff as part of their regular
duties.
Food Banks: Ogmore
Chris Elmore: [249987]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what data her Department collects
on the use of food banks in Ogmore.
Will Quince:
The Government does not collect official data on the use of food banks. We have
worked with the Scottish Government, food insecurity experts, and the Office for
National Statistics to introduce a new set of food security questions in the Family
Resources Survey starting from April 2019. This means that we will in future be able
to able to monitor the prevalence and severity of household food insecurity across the
UK and for specific groups, to better understand the drivers of food insecurity and
identify which groups are most at risk.
Health
Chris Ruane: [251919]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Office for
National Statistics' personal and economic well-being in the UK data series, what
estimate she has made of the proportion of (a) people that are long-term sick and (b)
disabled people that suffer from low personal wellbeing.
Justin Tomlinson:
The proportions of individuals aged 16-64 in the UK who reported low personal
wellbeing, in January-December 2018, by long-term health and disability status, are
given in the table below.
LONG-TERM HEALTH
CONDITION DISABLED ALL AGED 16-64
Life satisfaction 9.7% 13.8% 4.5%
Feel activities
worthwhile
7.8% 11.4% 3.7%
Happiness 14.4% 19.2% 8.4%
Anxiety 29.5% 35.7% 20.3%
Notes:
1. Estimates are based on the same data source (Annual Population Survey), time
period (January-December 2018) and geographical coverage (UK) as the Office for
National Statistics (ONS) publication referenced in the question: Personal and
economic well-being in the UK: April 2019 (
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/persona
landeconomicwellbeingintheuk/april2019#while-average-anxiety-levels-reached-a-
three-year-low-in-2018-about-103-million-people-continued-to-report-high-anxiety-
scores ).
2. While overall wellbeing estimates published by the ONS cover all adults aged 16
years and over, the breakdowns presented here are limited to those aged 16-64,
because most people aged 65 and over are not asked the disability and health
questions in this Survey.
3. Following ONS methodology, personal wellbeing is defined not as a single
measure, but the four separate measures of life satisfaction, feeling that the things
done in life are worthwhile, happiness and anxiety. These scores are self-reported
by survey respondents on an 11-point scale, from 0 to 10. “Low” personal wellbeing
is defined as those who report a score of 0-4 on life satisfaction, feeling that the
things done in life are worthwhile, or happiness, or a score of 6-10 on anxiety.
4. Personal well-being scores are reported by respondents at the time of interview,
including how happy or anxious they were “yesterday”, so the respondents
identified in this analysis do not necessarily “suffer from” low personal well-being
over an extended period.
5. Differences in proportions do not necessarily imply a direct causal relationship.
6. People with long-term health conditions are defined as those who report any
physical or mental health conditions or illnesses lasting or expecting to last 12
months or more.
7. Disabled people are defined as those who report a long-term health condition that
reduces their ability to carry out day-to-day activities. This is the Government
Statistical Service (GSS) Harmonised Principle, in line with the Equality Act 2010.
Housing Benefit: Domestic Abuse
Helen Hayes: [252018]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the
discretionary housing payment funding allocated to claimants affected by domestic abuse
in each of the last three years.
Will Quince:
Information on claimants affected by domestic abuse is not available to make an
estimate of Discretionary Housing Payment funding allocated to domestic abuse
victims due to data sensitivity.
DHP guidance highlights the use of the fund in supporting victims of domestic abuse
to move to a place of safety.
Members: Correspondence
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [252109]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when her Department plans to
respond to the letter of 4 February 2019 to the Minister of State for Employment from the
hon. Member for Slough on the case of a constituent, reference MC2019/06124.
Justin Tomlinson:
I replied to the hon. Member on 8 May 2019.
Personal Independence Payment: Appeals
Chris Ruane: [251922]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate she has made of the
proportion of rejected claims for personal independence payments that were overturned
at tribunal stage in each year since 2014.
Justin Tomlinson:
The requested information is shown in the table below:
Volume of initial decisions where PIP was disallowed, and the number &
proportion of these decisions that were Overturned at the appeal Stage, by year
of initial decision.
FINANCIAL YEAR OF
INITIAL DECISION
VOLUME OF PIP CLAIMS
DISALLOWED
DECISIONS
OVERTURNED AT
APPEAL
PERCENTAGE OF INITIAL
DECISIONS
OVERTURNED AT
APPEAL
2014/15 275,090 12,730 5%
2015/16 324,850 22,320 7%
2016/17 390,210 36,220 9%
2017/18 392,280 29,420 8%
2018/19 (Apr- Dec18) 282,280 3,410 1%
Source: PIP Computer System
Since PIP was introduced 3.9m decisions have been made up to December 2018, of
these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.
Data has been rounded to the nearest 10, and the nearest percent respectively.
This data is unpublished data. It should be used with caution and it may be subject to
future revision.
Disallowances include those both pre-referral and post-referral to an Assessment
Provider.
An appeal can only be made against a decision which has gone through the
Mandatory Reconsideration (MR) process. The figures above will include decisions
which have been changed at MR to award PIP, and where the claimant continues to
appeal for a higher PIP award, and are then changed again at tribunal appeal.
Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been
lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but
before it was heard at Tribunal).
Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had
time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.
Social Security Benefits: Coventry
Mr Jim Cunningham: [251210]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate she has made of the
number of people affected by administrative errors made by her Department which led to
the overpayment of benefits in Coventry.
Will Quince:
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is focused on paying people their
correct entitlement.
Administrative errors are referred to as ‘official errors’ which have arisen from
processing errors or delays by DWP or a Local Authority.
A quality checking regime is in place and this is helping address official error.
National Statistics Fraud and Error 2018/19 published 9 May 2019, indicate that
estimated losses from official error account for 0.4% of total benefit expenditure.
Internal Management Information shows that 48k claimants with a CV postcode had
an actual ‘official error’ overpayment in 2018/19.
Social Security Benefits: EU Nationals
Paul Blomfield: [252029]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of
the effect of the (a) Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Eligibility) (England)
(Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, (b) Child Benefit and Child Tax Credit
(Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 and (c) Social Security (Income-related
Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 on the right of people
with pre-settled status to access public funds.
Paul Blomfield: [252030]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what discussions she had with
stakeholder groups representing EEA citizens on the (a) Allocation of Housing and
Homelessness (Eligibility) (England) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, (b) Child
Benefit and Child Tax Credit (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 and (c) Social
Security (Income-related Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations
2019.
Alok Sharma:
The Government has always been clear that EU, EEA and Swiss nationals and their
family members granted status through the EU Settlement Scheme will be able to
continue their lives in the UK much as before, with the same entitlements as now to
access benefits, social housing and homelessness assistance services. Those
granted pre-settled status under the scheme will not have any change in their
entitlement to access benefits and services.
A consultation has not been carried out as these regulations do not reflect a change
in the existing rules or government policy and therefore will not have any adverse
effects. These regulations provide legal clarity to claimants, applicants, decision
makers and local authorities, delivering continuity and ensuring that the existing rules
are applied fairly.
Unemployment
Mr Ranil Jayawardena: [910855]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent estimate her
Department has made of the number of children in workless households.
Will Quince:
There are an estimated 1.2 million children living in workless households in the UK,
down 67,000 on the year and down 665,000 since 2010. There are now a third less
children living in workless households than in 2010.
Universal Credit
Stephen Timms: [251193]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment she has
made of the difficulties faced by universal credit claimants applying for a mortgage; and if
she will make a statement.
Will Quince:
The Financial Conduct Authority Handbook sets out rules and guidance for lenders.
This provides that, prior to entering into a mortgage, a lender must assess whether
the customer will be able to pay the sums due and must not enter into the transaction
unless it can demonstrate that the mortgage is affordable for the customer (and any
guarantor).
It is up to individual lenders to determine how to ensure adherence to this
requirement. Each lender is required to publish a written statement setting out the
factors it will take into account in assessing a customer's ability to pay. This must,
inter alia, address how income and expenditure is to be assessed, including details of
the types of income which are acceptable.
Stephen Timms: [251202]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of
the (a) accuracy and (b) clarity of the universal credit payment statements provided to
claimants.
Stephen Timms: [251203]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what plans she has to increase the
(a) accuracy and (b) clarity of the universal credit payment statements provided to
claimants.
Alok Sharma:
Universal Credit (UC) has been designed with accessibility and accuracy in mind and
we are committed to providing personalised support for all claimants. Most people
claiming UC will be able to access and navigate the internet, to make and maintain
their UC account.
The Department delivers UC in a way which responds to the needs of those who are
supported by it. UC payment statements have been designed to give claimants a
relevant breakdown of their award, including details of any outstanding debt and the
reason for deductions. Every UC award is calculated based on the circumstances of
individuals during each assessment period, taking into account savings, assets and
income.
Further enhancements will be introduced in the future to make UC payment
statements even easier to understand, with a particular focus on making it clearer
when amounts are deducted and whether people are being paid as a single person or
as part of a couple. Claimants will be able to access a ‘blank’ statement, available
through their online account as soon as their claim is received, allowing them to view
expected entitlements based on what information has been submitted.
Stephen Timms: [251205]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what plans she has to give staff
who advise universal credit claimants access to benefit calculations to enable them to
provide better support.
Alok Sharma:
Claimants and Jobcentre staff can access benefit calculators via the gov.uk website.
This includes links to three independent calculators and advice on the type of
information required to complete a calculation.
https://www.gov.uk/benefits-calculators
The independent benefits calculators we endorse are intended to provide useful
estimations of what people can get in certain circumstances, based on what
information is entered on the calculators themselves. This is to allow people to safely
explore what help they may receive from Universal Credit before they apply, or based
on potential changes of circumstances.
Chi Onwurah: [252105]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps her Department has
taken to ensure provision of out of working hours appointments to universal credit
claimants who work during working hours.
Alok Sharma:
Universal Credit is a 24 hour, seven days a week, digital service that allows claimants
to manage their own data and account online at a time which is convenient for them.
Via their account claimants can check their Universal Credit benefit payments, notify
us of changes and record notes via an online journal facility. In addition, established
claimants who call the Freephone Universal Credit helpline are connected directly to
the person or team who are dealing with the case.
We are aware that some claimants who are working may find it difficult to access our
Jobcentre Plus Service due to their work commitments, however, not all Universal
Credit claimants are required to attend interviews at their local Jobcentre. This will
depend on their individual personal circumstances. For claimants whose earnings are
above the individual or household Conditionality Earnings Threshold or the
Administrative Earnings Threshold there is no conditionality requirement to attend
interviews with a Work Coach.
Where a voluntary interview is necessary to verify evidence, claimants are able to
arrange the most convenient date and time with their Work Coach or Case Manager.
Universal Credit: Appeals
Stephen Timms: [251204]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of
whether the information provided to universal credit claimants, who request reasons for a
decision, meets the statutory requirements that it should (a) be adequate to allow a
challenge to the decision, if appropriate and (b) inform claimants of their right to challenge
the decision.
Alok Sharma:
The decision notice sent to the claimant explains not only their dispute rights but also
that they can request a statement of reasons for the decision made. That will not only
be a comprehensive explanation for the decision, as required in law, but it will also
remind the claimant of their dispute rights, including the time limit for making any
dispute.
Universal Credit: Disability
Chris Elmore: [249981]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what provisions are being made for
severe disability premium (SDP) claimants who were moved on to universal credit before
the transitional SDP amount came into force.
Chris Elmore: [249983]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the timescale is for her
Department (a) to identify all claimants who are eligible for a transitional severe disability
premium and (b) when that payment will be awarded to eligible claimants.
Justin Tomlinson:
I refer the hon. Member to the answer to Question 249942.
Universal Credit: Private Rented Housing
Steve McCabe: [249848]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April
to Question 243333, on Universal credit: private rented housing, what percentage of new
claimants contact the Money and Pensions Service within three months of signing on to
universal credit.
Steve McCabe: [249849]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April
to Question 243333 on Universal Credit: Private Rented Housing, if he will make an
assessment of trends in the level of claimants making contact since February 2019 as a
result of those changes.
Alok Sharma:
The requested information is not centrally collected by the Department.
The Money and Pension Service (MaPS) has replaced the three existing providers of
government-sponsored financial guidance – the Money Advice Service, the Pensions
Advisory Service and Pension Wise – which has brought together the provision of
debt advice, money guidance and pension guidance for the first time, streamlining the
services offered and reducing confusion for members of the public on who they
should contact.
The new body delivers free and impartial financial guidance and a more streamlined
service to members of the public providing easier access to the information and
guidance.
From January to March 2019 around 9,300 individuals visited the Money Manager
tool for Universal Credit claimants, hosted on the Money Advice Service website.
Additionally, over the same period, The Money and Pension Service money guidance
contact centre was contacted around 1,100 times regarding Universal Credit.
Universal Credit: Wales
Chris Elmore: [249988]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment she has
made of whether universal credit adequately covers the cost of living in Wales.
Alok Sharma:
Successive Governments have made decisions about the rates of benefits taking
account of the competing demands on public expenditure, mindful of the need to
balance poverty alleviation whilst not damaging incentives to work, as all
Governments since 1948 have striven to do.
Benefits provide a safety net for people to spend on their individual needs.
Government does not prescribe these, but provides support depending on
circumstances such as ability to work and need for childcare.
The applicable amount for Universal Credit is based upon a personal allowance paid
according to age and family status, which can be supplemented by flat-rate premiums
for groups recognised as having additional needs, such as disabled people and
carers.
Chris Elmore: [249989]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claimants received an
underpayment of universal credit (a) as their first payment and (b) in further payments in
(a) Ogmore and (b) Wales in 2018.
Alok Sharma:
The information requested is not held by the Department.
Our latest published data shows that consistently around 85% of new claimants are
being paid in full and on time. This can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/universal-credit-statistics.
WRITTEN STATEMENTS
JUSTICE
Publication of the response to the ‘Fit for the future: transforming the court and
tribunal estate’ consultation and the Court & Tribunal Design Guide
The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Mr David Gauke):
[HCWS1554]
On the 10 th May I published the response to the ‘Fit for the future: transforming the court
and tribunal estate ’ consultation. It sets out how decisions regarding the future of the
estate should be made and makes clear that people will continue to be able to access
court and tribunals while providing value for money for the taxpayer and ensuring long-
term efficiency.
The consultation published in January 2018, has been developed to complement
HMCTS’ £1bn Reform Programme, which is bringing new technology and modern ways
of working to the justice system, making it more accessible for everyone. It received 249
responses and as a result, the response published today, strengthens and updates the
principles underpinning future decisions relating to changes to our estate. It ensures that:
• When visits to courts are necessary, travel times and ease of transport will
continue to be prioritised – with added support for vulnerable users
• Court and tribunal buildings will be fit for purpose and can be maintained at a
reasonable cost to the taxpayer
• Specialist front-of-house staff will be at courts to support the public and legal
professionals, and will be trained in new technologies
• The estate is aligned with the Reform Programme
The provision for hearings in physical court rooms will remain essential for the fair, just
and proportionate delivery of justice. Yet we anticipate that fewer interactions with the
court and tribunals system will happen in this way. Any future changes to the court estate
which result in the relocation of a service from a local area will be consulted on publicly
before a decision is made, using the criteria set out in the Fit for the Future principles.
We expect the modernisation being delivered by the Reform Programme to provide
additional routes to justice and as a result lead to a reduction in the use of our court and
tribunal buildings. These modern channels will be additional to, rather than substitutions
for, existing routes. We make a commitment that we will not act on assumptions by
proposing to close courts unless we have sound evidence that the reforms are actually
reducing the use of those buildings.
Naturally, with an estate of this size there may be changes in demand for reasons other
than uptake of digital services, and in those circumstances, it may be sensible to close or
merge courts. Furthermore, this consultation has no effect on previously announced
closures which will go ahead as planned.
Our response to the consultation addresses several concerns which we have committed
to improving. One is that journeys to and from court should be reasonable and, for the
overwhelming majority of users, this would be one that allowed them to leave home no
earlier than 7.30am, attend their hearing and return home by 7.30pm the same day by
public transport. We also set out how we will measure this commitment and what other
factors we will consider – for example the circumstances of users including those that are
vulnerable.
The consultation was broadly positive about proposals regarding the design of our court
and tribunal buildings and reinforced the need for the security of those who use and work
in our courts and tribunals to be paramount and for ensuring suitable facilities for
vulnerable users. This is reflected in the new Court and Tribunal Design Guide published
today.
Our revised principles will strengthen and guide our analysis and assessment when we
consider future changes. It will better align the management of our estate to the wider
modernisation of our services and will make sure the court and tribunal estate remains fit
for the 21 st century.
Court and Tribunal Design Guide
Alongside Fit for the Future, HMCTS has also published a new Court and Tribunal
Design Guide. This has been developed after engaging with user groups, to make sure
the guide improves the experience for court and tribunal users, while providing value for
the taxpayer.
It provides the standards for refurbishment and redevelopment of existing and future
court and tribunal buildings. It aims to enable optimum use of facilities and improve user
experience and, along with the key elements of safety and security, sets out five
principles that must be incorporated into any building design. These principles define that
court and tribunal buildings must be appropriate, effective, accessible, flexible and
sustainable.
The guide was developed through extensive engagement with court and tribunal users to
ensure standards and designs meet their needs. The ‘Fit for the Future’ consultation
sought views on the proposed principles and approach to improving the design of court
and tribunal buildings and a total of 181 responses were received.
The guide will be used by HMCTS to help inform current and future building and
refurbishment work undertaken across the court and tribunal estate. As lessons are
learned and HMCTS reform initiatives develop, the Design Guide will be updated.
A copy of the consultation response has been placed in the libraries of both Houses.