dacbr n .dombrowsky, dc · 2019. 3. 18. · web references 1. indrajit ik digital imaging in rad....

97
NCCA CONVENTION PINEHURST, NC. RADIOLOGY for the DC N.DOMBROWSKY, DC DACBR [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 16-Nov-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

NCCA CONVENTION

PINEHURST, NC.

RADIOLOGY for the DC

N.DOMBROWSKY, DC DACBR [email protected]

Page 2: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY

• MARCH 22, 2019

• PINEHURST, NC

• N. Dombrowsky , DC DACBR

• © www.ProImaging.ws

Page 3: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

WET READ

• Place x-ray on

view-box

• Take pic of area

of interest

• Email – as jpeg

attachment.

Page 4: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

CASE – 34 F MVA 5.27.16

Page 5: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

6. 14. 2016 -PATIENT PRESENTS TO DC -

Page 6: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

DR. M. IOWA

Page 7: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 8: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

TELERADIOLOGY

jpeg

BOX.COM

CLOUD VENDOR

Page 9: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 10: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

d ARTIFACT

Page 11: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

dARTIFACT

Page 12: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 13: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

DR SYSTEMS

Page 14: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

dARTIFACT

Page 15: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 16: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

EXPOSURE INDICATORS

Page 17: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

d ARTIFACT

Page 18: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

FUTURE….

…DIAS in majority

-phosphors - structures

-tighter packing –

-↓ pixel size – SP

-faster processing – line x line

-archiving – “cloud”

- informed decision making

Page 19: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

WEB REFERENCES

1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17:

230-236

2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with modern conventional imaging

GJ Bansal Postgrad Med j. 2006; 82: 425-528

3. RadioGaphics 2007 ; 27-675:685 Advances in Digital

Radiography M.

4. Digital Radiography & PACS 2010 Mosby Elsevier

4. Merrill’s Atlas of Radiographic Positioning

& Procedures 11 Ed. Vol. 1 2007

5. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Basic_Physics_of_Digital_Radiography/The

Image_Receptor

Page 20: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

LUMBAR SPINE

POSITIONING CHALLENGES….

TRANSITIONAL SEGMENTS

SPONDYLOLISTHESIS.

VASCULAR

Page 21: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

d Hints for Radiation Worker

• Merrill ‘s Atlas of Rad.

Positioning 11th. Ed. Vol. 1,

2007 p. 38

– Collimation!!

– Part centering

– Split cassette– Lead strips

– R/Left Markers

• X-raytees.com

Page 22: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 23: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 24: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING TO THE LOWER EXTREMITY –HIP, KNEE & ANKLE

NCCA

PINEHURST, NC

MARCH 22, 2019

Page 25: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

HIP- FEMUR

Strongest

Gr.t – 4 facets

Ltr.

Anteverted

Spherical

Cartilage

Intertrochanteric region

fovea

Page 26: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

HIP JOINT - CAPSULE

12/4/16

Page 27: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 28: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 29: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

RESOURCES:

ANATOMY

https://primalpictures.com

-

https://www.netterimages.c

om

-https://www.imaios.com/en/e-

Anatomy

MRI

- http://freitasrad.net

- Xrayhead.com

- STANFORD

MSK MRI ATLAS

- Radassistant.nl

- Pocketradiologist.com

Page 30: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

NORMAL RADIOLOGY

12/4/16

Page 31: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

TOO MUCH TIME…

12/4/16

Page 32: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

2. DEVELOPMENTAL - Os acetabuli

3/16/2019

SEMINARS IN MSK RADIOLOGY – 2013; JUNE 2013:229-247

Page 33: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

2. DEVELOPMENTAL

12/4/16

Herniation pits in the femoral neck: a radiographic indicator of femoroacetabular impingement?

Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):167-72.

Page 34: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

ANATOMY - MUSCLES

12/4/16

EXTENSORS, LAT. ROTATORS

ABDUCTORS

Page 35: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC POSITIONING

3/16.19

Auntminnie.com

Page 36: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

OSTEONECROSIS

◼ Trauma

◼ Steroids

◼ Alcohol

◼ Radiation therapy

◼ others

Page 37: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

LEGG-CALVE-PERTHES

- 4-10 range

-Possible growth arrest

growth arrest:

-physeal bridging

- signal change

6 yo/M - NC

Page 38: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

3. OSTEONECROSIS

Diffuse edema

Focal serpiginous low SI line with fatty center

Double line sign

= T2WI-

Center - ↑SI

Periphery- ↓SI

Page 39: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

http://www.physio-pedia.com

Page 40: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

4. FRACTURES

STRESS –

femoral neck

sacrum *

supra-acetabular *

pubic bones

INSUFFICENCY

OP patients

no sig. trauma

Page 41: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

3. FRACTURE

T1 Linear low SI

with low SI ( fracture

line)

T2 -↓SI = fx. line

T2 -↑

Page 42: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 43: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

4. HIP: SOFT TISSUES - MUSCLE

⚫GRADE 1 – preservation

of morphology

⚫ GRADE 2 – 50% of fibers torn.

⚫ GRADE 3 – complete tearing

− +/- retraction

Pocket radiologist – TOP 100 DIAGNOSES - 2001

http://www.auntminnie.com/

Page 44: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

BURSA

Gr. Trochanteric bursa

• Hip flexion

• Ddx. Torn Gmed/min

• Middle age- elderly

• ?groin pain, mass

• Lat. To gr. trochanter

MRI

• ↑T2 – fluid paralling gr. Trochanter

Page 45: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

CASE

12/4/16

Page 46: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

http://www.scbtmr.org/Portals/9/Meetings/2010/Summer/STEINBACH_MRI%20of%20the%20Hip%20-%20Femoroacetabular%20Impingement.pdf

Page 47: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 48: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 49: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

12/4/16

Page 50: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

DDH-- COMPLICATIONS

12/4/16

Page 51: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

Clinical Sports Medicine.com 4th Edition (2012)

45 pts. with no history of hip

pain, symptoms, injury, or surgery.

73% -hip abn.

labral tears – mc (69%). chondral

defects (24%), fibrocystic changes of the femoral head/neck junction (22%),

osseous bumps (20%), sub-chondral bone cysts (16%), labral/paralabral cysts (13%), acetabular bone edema (11%), acetabular rim fractures (11%), and ligamentum teres

tears (2.2%)..

12/4/16

Page 52: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

PINEHURST 2019

• Did you learn?

• Did you enjoy?

• Is this helpful in

your clinical

practice?

Page 53: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

THE KNEE

• AP VIEW– PA VIEW

• LATERAL

• TUNNEL

• SUNRISE

http://eorif.com/knee-xray

http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/mri/weight-bearing-x-rays-knee-pain-preferable-mri

Page 54: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/mri/weight-bearing-x-rays-knee-pain-preferable-mri

September 20, 2016

Page 55: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MRI - normal

S-PDAXIAL – FAT SAT

Page 56: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

axial

Page 57: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

RESOURCES

• http://www.freitasrad.net

• X-rayhead.com– STANFORD - MSK MRI ATLAS

• http://radiologyassistant.nl/

• https://radiopaedia.org/

Page 58: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MENISCOFEMORAL LIG. INSERTION

– 75% of knees

– Menisco-femoral ligament • Anterior portion =lig. Of

Humphrey

• Posterior portion = Wrisberg

Page 59: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MENISCOFEMORAL LIG. INSERTION

– 75% of knees

– Menisco-femoral ligament • Anterior portion =lig. Of

Humphrey

• Posterior portion = Wrisberg

Page 60: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

RESOURCES

• http://www.freitasrad.net

• X-rayhead.com– STANFORD - MSK MRI ATLAS

• http://radiologyassistant.nl/

• https://radiopaedia.org/

Page 61: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MENISCOFEMORAL LIG. INSERTION

– 75% of knees

– Menisco-femoral ligament • Anterior portion =lig. Of

Humphrey

• Posterior portion = Wrisberg

Page 62: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

RESOURCES

• http://www.freitasrad.net

• X-rayhead.com– STANFORD - MSK MRI ATLAS

• http://radiologyassistant.nl/

• https://radiopaedia.org/

Page 63: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

PITFALLS - MFL

Page 64: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

LIGAMENTS

• ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT– Straight, taut, parallel to

intercondylar notch

– Striated, some SI- esp. at insertion

– Torn= no normal fibers seen

– Flatter angle,

– cystic appearance/drumstick –mimics tear

– * discontinuity, abn.orientation, nonvisualization

Dreamtimes.com

Page 65: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

t ACL

Page 66: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

t ACL

Page 67: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

ACL

Page 68: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT

• Hockey stick appearance

• Infreq. torn and less freq. surgically repaired.

• Stretches…

Page 69: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

tPCL

• ↑SI all sequences

• PD

• > 6 mm. thick

Page 70: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT

• Fibers connected to

joint capsule

• mMEN – attachment

• NOT intrasynovial

– Grade 1 – ↑SI. soft

tissues medial to MCL

– Grade 2 –

hSI+disruption within

MCL

– Grade 3 – complete

tear

Page 71: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

LCL

• Bf-fcl – prox.fibula

• -iliotibial band –G. tubercle

• Not as frequent as MCL

• Posterior corner inj. *– LCL inj.

– + pop.tendon tears

– Arculate lig.

– Popliteal-fib.ligament

– +/- ACL OR PCLcFAT-SAT

Page 72: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

POSTERIOR CORNER INJURY

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007.

Page 73: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

JUMPER’S KNEE

Page 74: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

BURSAE

• POPLITEAL

– Between med. Gastroc

& SM

– >5 ml. fluid abn.

Page 75: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

OSSEOUS STRUCTURES

• Contusions = microfractures

• May progress if:

– A. geographic

– B. reticulated *

• ACL tear

– Bone contusion – posterior lateral portion of

tibial plateau

– Pivot shift phenomenon

– “kissing” contusion

Page 76: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

OSTEOCHONDRAL LESION

Page 77: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

PINEHURST 19

• Did you learn?

• Did you enjoy?

• Is this helpful in your clinical practice?

Page 78: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING TO THE LOWER EXTREMITY –ANKLE

PINEHURST, NC

MARCH, 22 2019.

N. DOMBROWSKY, DC DACBR

Page 79: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 80: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 81: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 82: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

http://www.radiologyassistant.nl

Page 83: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

MRI – too expensive

- clinical examination

LIGAMENTOUS INJURIES

MSK MRI – 2ND. EDITION – 2009 P. 395

Page 84: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY –

• OS TRIGNOUM • Post. Ankle impingment• Forced plantar flexion

– BB, hill running, ballet

• 1. BME/fx. Of trigonal process or

• 2. talocalcaneal

• MRI– ↑ si – talus– si – fx. Of

synchondrosis– S. tenosynovitis- FHL

Page 85: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY –

• Os naviculare

• BME, bursitis, deg.

• +/- PTT tears– B, hill running,

ballet

• MRI– ↑ si – T2- all abn.

• .

Page 86: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY

– PLANTAR FASCITIS• Obese F, runners, SSA

• Chronic rep. stressors

• Tears, myxoid deg. ,

infl.

• RUPTURE:– Forced dorsiflexion

– Thicken. Disrupt. In

midportion

Page 87: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

s-FAT SAT

Page 88: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

Morton’s neuroma

- F- high heels

- plantar N. entrapment- - 2’

perineural fibrosis.

- tear – drop shaped mass

-T1W – low

-T2W- dependant upon fibrosis

present

- +/- bursal fluid

Page 89: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY –TRAUMA

• Pf –inconclusive

• Osteochondritis dess.=

osteochondral lesion

• Med. Or lat. Talar

dome

• +/- lig. Injuries

ePainAssist.com

HELMS MSK MRI 2ND. ED.

P. 413

Page 90: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY –TRAUMA

• MRI– Stable– ↑T2W – around

fragment.– Absent or displaced fr.– Cartilage fr.– Subcondral cysts.

Page 92: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

IMAGING OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY –STRESS FRACTURES

• STRESS FRACTURES

Gen. perpendicular

to long axis

• EXCEPT:

• Med. Mall - vertical

Page 93: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

JANUARY 2017

Page 94: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 95: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with
Page 96: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

CASES

Page 97: DACBR N .DOMBROWSKY, DC · 2019. 3. 18. · WEB REFERENCES 1. Indrajit IK Digital imaging in rad. Practice J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17: 230-236 2. Digital Radiology. A comparison with

PINEHURST 19

• Did you learn?

• Did you enjoy?

• Is this helpful in

your clinical

practice?