d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
1/7
Extraction, purification and concentration of partially saturated canthaxanthin
from Aspergillus carbonarius
D. Krupa a,b,1, E. Nakkeeran a,1, N. Kumaresan c, G. Vijayalakshmi c, R. Subramanian a,*
a Department of Food Engineering, Central Food Technological Research Institute, CSIR, Mysore 570 020, Indiab Department of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641 004, Indiac Department of Food Microbiology, Central Food Technological Research Institute, CSIR, Mysore 570 020, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 December 2009
Received in revised form 23 April 2010
Accepted 27 April 2010
Available online 26 May 2010
Keywords:
Aspergillus carbonarius
Partially saturated canthaxanthin
Extraction
Nanofiltration
Purification
a b s t r a c t
A mutant Aspergillus carbonarius produces partially saturated canthaxanthin (PSC; C40H62O2) during sub-
merged fermentation. The pigment was extracted from dried biomass using various organic solvents and
purified using nanofiltration (NF) and nonporous membranes. Particle size had a great influence; PSC
extractability from fines fraction of biomass (75105 lm) was 1.5-fold higher compared to the coarsefraction (850920lm) in ethanol. Amongthe four solvents, hexaneexhibited the highest PSC extractabil-ity of 5.83 mg/g and purity of 32 mg/g. On a relative scale, the extraction performance of hexane, acetone,
methanol and ethanol were in the order 100, 16.1, 7.5 and 5.4. An assessment based on enrichment factor
and permeate flux revealed notable performance with NF-250 membrane in ethanol extract followed by
NF-200 and NF-GKSS membranes in methanol extract. These results suggested the suitability of hexane
for extraction followed by alcohol phase purification and concentration employing NF. Accordingly, a PSC
purity of 206 mg/g was achieved.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Colours are one of the important aesthetic properties of food
and colouring of foods has been an age old practice. This practice
has increased many folds with the invention of synthetic colou-
rants largely owing to their good stability and colouring ability
(Pattnaik et al., 1997). Though synthetic colours dominate the mar-
ket, even among the permitted synthetic pigments, some of them
may be toxic, carcinogenic or may cause severe damage to vital or-
gans (Duran et al., 2002). This has given rise to a strong interest in
natural colouring alternatives.
Carotenoids are a group of pigments of varying tints from red to
yellow and possess significant biological activities. Irrespective of
their biological functions, selected carotenoids are widely used as
food colourants and additives in feeds (Pandey and Pandey,
2008). Industrial interest is gradually shifting away from the yel-
low carotenoids such as b-carotene and lutein towards more valu-
able orange-red keto-carotenoids owing to the beneficial effects
these compounds exert on various disease conditions (Bhosale
and Bernstein, 2005). Canthaxanthin and astaxanthin are the two
major keto-carotenoids and canthaxanthin is the precursor of asta-
xanthin. Canthaxanthin has been reported to be an effective anti-
oxidant (Palozza and Krinsky, 1992) and has important
applications in nutraceutical, cosmetic, food and feed industries
(Zhu et al., 2009). Canthaxanthin is abundant in marine sources
such as crustaceans, fishes and microalgae, and other biological
sources include fungi and bacteria (Krupa, 2009). However, cantha-
xanthin is currently produced only synthetically on an industrial
scale (Bhosale and Bernstein, 2005), for which at present no cheap
commercially exploitable plant or animal sources exist. Even
though this carotenoid can be synthesized chemically, synthesis
of nature identical enantiopure compound is difficult (Ernst,
2002). In this context, microorganisms have an advantage over
other natural sources, as the fermentation process is highly manip-
ulable to achieve higher growth rate and greater cell density (Das
et al., 2007) without posing any serious production limitations in
terms of space and time. In our earlier studies attempts were made
towards production optimization of partially saturated canthaxan-
thin (PSC; C40H62O2) from Aspergillus carbonarius (Sanjay et al.,
2007) and its characterization as 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 11 0, 120, 130,
140, 150 decahydro b, b carotene-4,40 dione (Kumaresan et al.,
2008). Canthaxanthin is lipophilic, and so is accumulated in the cell
membrane, lipid bilayer, or in lipid deposits accumulated within
some oleaginous organisms, hence requires purification before
their indented applications.
Pigment extraction from microbial sources is generally carried
out employing organic solvents. A wide range of polar and non-po-
0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.093
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 821 251 3910; fax: +91 821 251 7233.
E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Subramanian).1 These authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.
Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Bioresource Technology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b i o r t e c h
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.093mailto:[email protected]://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09608524http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biortechhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/biortechhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09608524mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.093 -
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
2/7
lar solvents either individually, sequentially or in combination
have been employed for optimal extraction of carotenoids from al-
gae, fungi and bacteria with and without pretreatment to biomass
(Meckel and Kester, 1980; Hejazi et al., 2002; Park et al., 2007;
Papaioannou et al., 2008). Ultrasonic- and HCl-assisted extractions,
as well as supercritical CO2 extraction have also been attempted for
carotenoids extraction from microbial sources (Gu et al., 2008;
Krichnavaruk et al., 2008; Thana et al., 2008). These studies re-
vealed that the method of extraction and solvent to be employed
depends on the nature of carotenoid as well as biomass produced
by the typical microbial source. In the present study, extraction
of PSC produced byA. carbonarius was carried out using various or-
ganic solvents to improve the extractability as well as purity.
Membrane processing offers several advantages over conven-
tional downstream processing methods such as chromatographic
separations and it has been demonstrated that they are convenient
and easy to scale-up in the purification and concentration of pec-
tinase (Devi and Appu Rao, 1996; Singh et al., 1999). However,
there are only a few attempts towards processing carotenoids ex-
tracts using membranes. Sarrade et al. (1998) employed supercrit-
ical CO2 extraction followed by NF to extract and purifyb-carotene
from a model carrot oil (sunflower oil and b-carotene) and natural
extract of carrot seed. Two types of NF membranes of$1 nm pore
size, namely, inorganic membrane-T (TiO2) and organic mem-
brane-TN (TiO2 coated with an organic layer, Nafion) were used.
The results indicated that the membrane selectivity for b-carotene
could vastly differ depending on the nature of the active surface of
the membrane as well as the individual system. Tsui and Cheryan
(2007) employed ultrafiltration (UF) and NF for the purification
and concentration of xanthophylls in ethanol extracts of corn. UF
eliminated ethanol-soluble proteins (zein) and other large solutes
from the extract. NF membranes with 200300 Da MWCO exhib-
ited almost total rejection of xanthophylls and a 300 Da NF mem-
brane displayed greater solvent stability indicating its suitability
for concentration and solvent recycle in the process. Subramanian
et al. (2001) made attempts to understand the actual rejection
mechanism of carotenoids in vegetable oils by a nonporous mem-brane (NP). In model systems, the membrane rejected lutein by
60% in the absence of added surfactants, whereasb-carotene rejec-
tion was only 18% under similar conditions. The hydroxyl groups
present in lutein make it more polar compared tob-carotene which
explained the higher rejections of lutein in the model system and
oxygenated carotenoids in the crude vegetable oils by the hydro-
phobic membrane. These membranes rejected 96% of chlorophyll
from model oil containing added chlorophyll (Kondal Reddy
et al., 2001).
In the present investigation, the influence of particle size of
ground biomass and type of solvent were studied towards greater
extraction of PSC. Further, various NF and NP membranes were
evaluated for the purification and concentration of PSC in biomass
extracts of A. carbonarius in polar and non-polar solvents used asextractants.
2. Methods
2.1. Chemicals
Peptone, yeast extract and agar-agar were purchased from M/s
Hi-Media, Mumbai, India. Corn flour was procured from the local
market. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, L-dextrose and oxalic
acid used for the estimation of inorganic phosphates, carbohy-
drates and total acids were of analytical grade and purchased from
M/s Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai, India. All the other ana-
lytical and laboratory grade chemicals and solvents were procuredfrom reputed companies in the country.
2.2. Organism
A mutantA. carbonarius, deposited at the culture collection cen-
tre of the Food Microbiology Department, CFTRI under the acces-
sion number UV 10046, was used in this study. The inoculum
was developed in corn flour medium (4% corn flour, 0.5% diammo-
nium hydrogen phosphate and 0.5% ammonium dihydrogen phos-
phate; pH 5.5) for 48 h at 30 C and transferred to the production
medium that had an identical composition as that of inoculum
medium while maintaining pH at 3.0 with 250 mM citratephos-
phate buffer. In order to enhance aeration, baffled Erlenmeyer
flasks were used which were incubated for 48 h at 30 C ona rotary
shaker (200 rpm). The harvested culture broth was filtered through
muslin cloth and the biomass obtained was dried in a lyophilizer
(Lyodryer LT5B, Lyophilsation Systems, Bangkok, Thailand).
2.3. Sieving
The lyophilized biomass was pulverized in a mixer grinder
(Slimline, 0.5 l capacity, 500 W, 18,000 rpm; M/s Chhaya Indus-
tries, Valsad, India) for 2 min. The ground biomass was then sub-
jected to successive sieving starting from large to small sieves
with 920, 850, 710, 350, 250, 180, 150, 105 and 75 lm openings,to get various defined range of size fractions. Five different size
fractions (850920, 350710, 180250, 105150 and 75105 lm)were used in the extraction experiments.
2.4. Determination of percentage extinction coefficient of PSC in
different solvents
2.4.1. Purification of PSC by thin layer chromatography
Pigment from biomass was extracted by mixing 2 g of biomass
with 100 ml absolute ethanol under stirring at 250 rpm for 1 h at
room temperature (28 2 C). The ethanol extract obtained was
concentrated in a flash evaporator at 40 C (Rotavapor R205, Bchi
Labortechnik, Postfach, Switzerland). The concentrate was then
spotted on a preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC) silicaplate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and developed in a chamber
saturated with isooctane:acetone:diethyl ether (3:1:1, v/v/v) at
room temperature. The major yellow spot (PSC) from the TLC plate
was scrapped, eluted into ethanol and centrifuged at 2200g for
5 min to remove silica gel. The PSC obtained was concentrated in
the flash evaporator and subjected to further purification by re-
peated TLC. The purity of the PSC was established by High Perfor-
mance Liquid Chromatography on a C18 Supelco Discovery Column
(isocratic elution using methanol and acetone (95:5, v/v) at 1 ml/
min) (Kumaresan et al., 2008).
2.4.2. Determination of percentage extinction coefficient
A known amount of PSC (9.04 103 lg) was dissolved in a
known volume (1 ml) of specific solvent (methanol, ethanol, ace-tone and hexane). The kmax and corresponding absorbance values
of PSC in the above solvents were determined after suitable dilu-
tion using a UVvis spectrophotometer (UV-160A, Shimadzu Sci-
entific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan). Then the percentage extinction
coefficient of PSC in each of the solvent was determined from the
following relation.
Percentage extinction coefficient 1=g=100 ml=cm
Absorbance at kmax 10
Concentration of PSC mg=ml Path length cm
2.5. Extraction of PSC
PSC extraction from biomass was carried out using methanol,ethanol, acetone and hexane. To 1 g of dried biomass, 20 ml of sol-
D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604 7599
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
3/7
vent was added and stirred at 250 rpm for 1 h at roomtemperature
(2 8 2 C). After stirring, the extract was separated from biomass
by centrifugation at 2200g for 15 min and PSC concentration in
the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically. The par-
tially extracted biomass (centrifuged solids) was subjected to re-
peated extraction (with 10 ml of respective solvent each time) to
maximize extraction till the concentration of PSC in the extract
(supernatant) reached to610% of the first extract.
2.6. Membranes
The composite NF membranes (MPF-34 and MPF-44) of MWCO
200 and 250 Da were procured from M/s Koch Membrane Systems,
Massachusetts, USA. The MPF-34 (NF-200) is a hydrophilic mem-
brane and not recommended to exposure to organic solvents. The
MPF-44 (NF-250) is also a hydrophilic membrane but claimed to
be resistant to various organic solvents (hexane, acetone and alco-
hols) and water, by the manufacturer. In addition, a laboratory-
made NF membrane (NF-GKSS) developed by GKSS Forschungszen-
trum, Geesthacht, Germany was also used. This membrane too is
hydrophilic in nature and resistant to various organic solvents
(acetone, alcohols and ether) and water. Hydrophobic NP mem-brane (NTGS 2200) with silicon as active layer and polyimide as
support layer (Nitto Denko, Osaka, Japan) is resistant to hexane
and was obtained from the National Food Research Institute, Tsu-
kuba, Japan. The NF and NP membranes were cut into circular discs
(7.5 cm diameter with 32 cm2 effective area) and fitted in the self-
stirred membrane cell in such a way that active surface comes into
contact with the feed material.
2.7. Membrane filtration system
Experiments were conducted at room temperature (28 2 C)
and 2 MPa pressure under nitrogen atmosphere. To minimize con-
centration polarization effect, the contents in the cell were stirredon a magnetic stirrer (800 rpm). The unit was operated in batch
mode by charging the cell with 100 ml of PSC extract. The experi-
mental run was stopped upon achieving the desired volume con-
centration ratio (VCR) of 5. Flux corresponded to the actual
measurement for the experimental run. Pure solvent fluxes were
also measured before processing each of the PSC extract.
Membranes were cleaned with the respective solvents for 1 h after
the experimental run. The near complete recovery of original sol-
vent flux was the criterion followed for membrane reuse after
cleaning.
2.8. Estimation of PSC
The optical density of PSC extracts obtained with methanol, eth-anol, acetone and hexane were measured at their respective kmax(414, 415.5, 412.5 and 410 nm) in the UVvis spectrophotometer
and the PSC concentration was calculated using the respective per-
centage extinction coefficient.
2.9. Estimation of total carbohydrates, inorganic phosphate and total
acids
Total carbohydrates were determined by the phenolsulphuric
acid method using dextrose as standard (Rao and Pattabiraman,
1989). Inorganic phosphate content was determined using potas-
sium dihydrogen phosphate as standard (Ames, 1966). Total acids
were determined as titrable acidity using 0.1 N sodium hydroxide(Ranganna, 2003).
2.10. Performance parameters
The performance of the membrane process was expressed as
percentage observed rejection (Ro) of each component. Ro was
determined, assuming that it was constant for each batch experi-
ment (Cheryan, 1998). Other performance parameters of mem-
brane process (NF and NP) were determined as follows.
Ro % 100 lnCR=CF
lnVF=VR1
Volume concentration ratio VCR VF
VR2
Recovery % CR VRCF VF
100 3
Elimination % CF VF CR VR
CF VF
100 4
where CF, CP and CR are the PSC concentration (lg/ml) or carbohy-drate content (mg/ml) or phosphate salts (mg/ml) or total acids
(N) in feed, permeate and retentate, respectively. VF, VP and VR are
the volume of feed, permeate and retentate (ml), respectively.
All extraction experiments were carried out in triplicate and
membrane runs in duplicate and the mean values are reported.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Influence of particle size on PSC extractability from biomass
The yield of target compound is very important in any extrac-
tion process, more so in the case of valuable compounds such as
carotenoids because it has a direct bearing on the production eco-
nomics. The various defined range of size fractions of dried bio-
mass were subjected to stepwise extraction with ethanol until
the concentration of PSC in the extract reached to610% of the first
extract. The amount of PSC recovered from these five size fractions
is plotted against various stages of extraction and the volume of
solvent used (Fig. 1). It clearly showed that smaller the particle sizeor in other words greater the surface area, greater was the extract-
ability for a given volume of solvent. These results revealed that
particle size had an inverse influence on PSC recovery. Further, as
the volume of solvent employed increased, the amount of PSC ex-
tracted increased for all the five size fractions used in the study
(Fig. 1). The recovery of PSC was 1.223 mg from 1 g of coarse frac-
tion of dried biomass during the first step of extraction with 20 ml
ethanol which improved to 1.694 mg by 28% after four successive
steps with 50 ml ethanol. The corresponding recoveries with the
fines fraction were 1.861 and 2.261 mg, respectively. The cumula-
tive improvement in PSC extraction during second, third and fourth
steps were 4%, 10% and 6%, respectively. These results revealed that
recovery could be improved by $85% by optimizing the extraction
conditions. The stepwise extraction basically indicated the extentto which the extraction process should be carried out. It also
helped to optimize the volume of solvent required in the extraction
process. Subsequent studies were made only with very fine (75
105lm) and coarse (850920lm) fractions of ground biomassto assess the comparative extraction performance with polar and
non-polar solvents.
3.2. Percentage extinction coefficient of PSC in extraction solvents
The extractability of PSC varies with different solvents. There-
fore percentage extinction coefficient of PSC in methanol, ethanol,
acetone and hexane were determined to quantify the actual
amount of PSC extracted (Table 1). The percentage extinction coef-
ficient and absorbance at kmax at a particular concentration of PSCwere greater in polar solvents compared to the most non-polar sol-
7600 D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
4/7
vent, hexane (Table 1) suggesting that the solubility of PSC was
greater in polar solvents which is rather expected considering
the molecular structure of PSC (Kumaresan et al., 2008).
3.3. Solvent extraction of PSC
Extractability of PSC was studied with fines and coarse fractions
of biomass using polar and non-polar solvents with a view to en-
hance its recovery. Step-wise extractions were carried out with
methanol, acetone and hexane as described earlier with ethanol.
3.3.1. Purity of biomass extracts
The biomass contains the media components such as carbohy-
drates, salts and acids besides the target compound, PSC. Theseimpurities were co-extracted along with PSC during extraction
with polar and non-polar solvents. Membrane lipids would also
potentially be extracted by more non-polar solvents. Extracts of
polar solvents contain higher amounts of hydrophilic impurities
while extracts of non-polar solvent would contain substantial
amounts of lipophilic impurities. Accordingly, relatively larger
amounts of carbohydrates, salts and acids were found in polar sol-
vent extracts owing to their solubility in the order of solvent polar-
ity(Table 2). Comparatively these impurities were present in much
lower amounts in the hexane extract leading to a higher degree of
purity of extracted PSC (32 mg/g of total soluble solids). However,
hexane extract is likely to contain substantial amounts of mem-
brane lipids owing to its hydrophobic nature.
3.3.2. Solvent selection for PSC extraction
Hexane exhibited the highest PSC extractability among the var-
ious solvents studied (Fig. 2). The extractability of hexane was 2.1-
fold higher than ethanol in the first step of extraction with coarse
fraction of biomass. The increase in extractability was higher in
subsequent steps with increased volume of solvent employed;
amount of PSC extracted with hexane was 3.2-fold higher than eth-
anol with coarse fraction after four steps of extraction. The maxi-
mum amount of PSC extracted with hexane was 5.825 mg/g of
fines fraction of biomass while the maximum amount extracted
with the conventionally employed ethanol was only 2.261 mg/g
of biomass. The extraction performance was expressed as a prod-
uct of extractability and extraction purity of PSC. Accordingly the
normalized performance with hexane was 619-fold higher thanpolar solvents (Table 3). The extractability of methanol and ace-
tone fell between ethanol and hexane, methanol being closer to
ethanol (Fig. 2 and Table 3).
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
850-920 m
350-710 m
180-250 m
105-150 m
75-105 mAmountofPSC(mg/gof
drybiomass)
Volume of ethanol (ml)
Fig. 1. Amount of PSC extracted in ethanol from various size fractions of ground biomass.
Table 1
Percentage extinction coefficient of PSC in various organic solvents.
Solvent kmax(nm)
Absorbance at
kmax ()
Percentage extinction coefficient
(1/(g/100 ml)/cm)
Methanol 414.0 0.706 781
Ethanol 415.5 0.806 891
Acetone 412.5 0.717 793
Hexane 410.0 0.236 261
Concentration of PSC used for estimation was 9.04 103 lg/ml.
Table 2
Carbohydrate, salt and acid contents in various solvent extracts of biomass from A. carbonarius.
Solvent CHO (g/l) Inorganic phosphates (g/l) Total acids (N)
Fines fraction Coarse fraction Fines fraction Coarse fraction Fines fraction Coarse fraction
Methanol 0.485 0.044 0.389 0.069 0.591 0.018 0.551 0.093 0.0664 0.0003 0.0566 0.0003
Ethanol 0.367 0.036 0.315 0.042 0.094 0.006 0.063 0.007 0.0326 0.0003 0.0296 0.0003
Acetone 0.412 0.134 0.417 0.047 0.048 0.013 0.044 0.017 0.0096 0.0003 0.0088 0.0003
Hexane 0.033 0.008 0.020 0.014 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.002 0.0025 0.0000 0.0017 0.0000
All the experiments were carried out in triplicate (n = 3) and samples were analyzed in triplicate (n = 3). 1:50 extract (1 g biomass and 50 ml solvent); CHO: carbohydrates;fines fraction: 75105 lm; coarse fraction: 850920 lm.
D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604 7601
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
5/7
The chemical formula of a specific carotenoid influences its rel-
ative polarity. For instance lutein containing two hydroxyl groups
is more polar than b-carotene while PSC with two keto (carbonyl)
groups in its structure is less polar than lutein but more polar than
b-carotene. Extractability depends on the solvating power and abil-
ity of the solvent to permeabilize the cell wall (Leshchev and Sin-
kevich, 2003; Park et al., 2007). The maximum extractability of PSC
was obtained with hexane which was nearly 2.22.6-fold highercompared to the polar solvents used in the study. The solubility
of PSC is expected to be greater in polar solvents compared to hex-
ane as reflected in the differences in percentage extinction coeffi-
cients (Table 1). Therefore, higher extractability in hexane could
be attributed to the greater permeabilizing ability of hexane in dis-
rupting the cell walls and membrane (lipid) layers to effectively re-
lease the PSC from the biomass. Interestingly, there was no
significant difference between the extractability of PSC with fines
and coarse fractions of biomass with hexane, suggesting elimina-
tion of size reduction step in the process (Fig. 2). Although fineness
of particle generally increases the extractability it could lead to
other operational problems such as fouling and flooding of the
extractor. Also, size reduction greatly increases the amount of en-
ergy used for the process. These results suggest that the penetrat-ing power of hexane played a more important role during the
extraction of PSC than the particle size and surface area as well
as the matching polarity of solvent. The purity of PSC obtainedwith
hexane extract was 32 mg/g of soluble solids and attempts were
made to improve the purity further by employing membrane
processing.
3.4. Membrane processing of biomass extracts
Membrane processing of various solvent extracts of biomass
was attempted with three different hydrophilic NF membranes
(NF-200, NF-250 and NF-GKSS) and a hydrophobic NP membrane(NTGS 2200) to improve the purity of PSC while simultaneously
aiming for higher recovery. In addition, membranes were chosen
to aid in concentrating the target compound in the product stream
(retentate). Solvent compatibility of these membranes was tested
before the experimental runs. The laboratory-made NF-GKSS
membrane was claimed to be resistant to various organic solvents
(acetone, alcohols and ether) (Zwijnenberg et al., 1999) and was
actually resistant to all the solvents including hexane used in the
study. The NF-250 membrane is claimed to be resistant to various
organic solvents by the manufacturer but was found to be not sta-
ble with hexane, as was also reported by other researchers (Van
der Bruggen et al., 2002). The NF-200 membrane is not recom-
mended to exposure to organic solvents but remained stable with
methanol and ethanol. The NTGS 2200 membrane was stable onlywith hexane.
3.4.1. Selectivity for PSC
The selectivity of NF and NP membranes was assessed for PSC
and other known impurities in four different solvent phases and
the results are presented in Table 4. NF-GKSS membrane exhibited
the highest rejection of 89% and recovery of 84% PSC in methanol
extract among the various combinations of membrane and extract
studied. This membrane gave the highest rejection of PSC in meth-
anol, acetone and hexane extracts compared to other membranes
while NF-250 membrane gave the highest rejection with ethanol
extract. The experimental runs with three different NF membranes
with ethanol and methanol extracts revealed their contrasting
behaviour in terms of PSC rejection. Bhanushali et al. (2002) re-ported the solute permeation characteristics of Sudan IV (384 Da
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Methanol -CF
Methanol -FF
Ethanol -CF
Ethanol -FF
Acetone -CF
Acetone -FF
Hexane -CFHexane -FF
AmountofPSC(mg/gofd
rybiomass)
Volume of solvent (ml)
Fig. 2. Amount of PSC extracted from coarse and fines fractions of biomass in various organic solvents. CF coarse fraction (850920lm); FF fines fraction (75-105 lm).
Table 3
Extraction performance of solvents for PSC from biomass (fines fraction) of A.
carbonarius.
Solvent Extractability
(mg/g)
Extraction purity
(mg/g)
Normalized extraction
performance ()
Methanol 2.605 0.095 5.28 0.15 7.5
Ethanol 2.261 0.084 4.29 0.13 5.4
Acetone 3.170 0.096 9.59 0.35 16.1
Hexane 5.825 0.099 31.96 0.40 100
Extraction purity= Ratio of PSC concentration to total soluble solids.
Normalized extraction performance ExtractabilityExtraction purityany solventExtractabilityMaxExtraction purityMax
100:
All theexperiments were carried outin triplicate (n = 3) andsamples were analyzed
in triplicate (n = 3). Extractability= Amount of PSC extracted (mg of PSC from 1 g of
dried biomass) with 50 ml of solvent.
7602 D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
6/7
organic dye) in polar and non-polar solvent medium using hydro-
phobic (PDMS) and hydrophilic (aromatic polyamide) NF mem-
branes. The rejection of Sudan IV in n-hexane medium was $25%
while in methanol it was $10% with the hydrophobic membrane.
The direction of separation reversed with the hydrophilic mem-
brane (86% in methanol and 43% in n-hexane). Factors such as sol-
ute-membrane interactions and solute charge/conformation could
play a role in the actual rejection behaviour of specific solute in
various solvent systems (varying in polarity) by different mem-
branes (hydrophobic and hydrophilic).
3.4.2. Removal of impurities
The membrane selectivity towards PSC with respect to removal
of impurities such as carbohydrates, salts and acids during mem-
brane processing of various solvent extracts are shown in Table 4.
In the case of hexane extract, carbohydrate and phosphate salt con-
tents were below detectable level suggesting very high membrane
selectivity; but actual values could not be determined. Among the
three polar solvent extracts, the highest selectivity towards re-
moval of carbohydrates was exhibited by NF-250 membrane with
both ethanol and methanol extracts. A very high selectivity for theremoval of phosphate salts was observed only with the NF-250
membrane, but only with the ethanol extract (Table 4). The estima-
tion of acids includes citric acid (from the media) and other organic
acids, as well as hydrolyzed fatty acids of membrane lipids. There-
fore, their solubility differed to varying degrees in different sol-
vents. The acids present in the hexane extract could be mainly
the free fatty acids that were extracted due to their polarity (Ta-
ble 2). NF-GKSS membrane exhibited an excellent selectivity to-
wards removal of acids during processing acetone extract
(Table 4). Bhosle et al. (2005) and Zwijnenberg et al. (1999) re-
ported good selectivity for deacidification by NF-GKSS membrane
while processing model systems containing triglycerides, FFA and
acetone. All the other combinations were virtually ineffective to-
wards removal of acids. The selectivity of NF process employing
an organic solvent is rather complicated with several factors such
as solubility and diffusivity of permeating components and their
solubility in solvent and membrane material playing vital role.
3.4.3. Performance assessment in solvent phase
The purity as well as recovery of the target compound and the
process productivity determines the selection of a process step
during downstream processing. These selection parameters havea direct bearing on the process economics. Membrane processing
with various extracts exhibited that the PSC enrichment was high-
est with NF-GKSS membrane in methanol extract (4.2-fold), fol-
lowed by the same membrane in acetone extract (3.2-fold), NF-
200 membrane in methanol extract and NF-250 membrane in eth-
anol extract (Table 5). Though the purity was higher in hexane and
acetone extracts, the enrichment factor or flux was much lower.
However, the membrane performance, taking into account both
membrane productivity and enrichment factor, demonstrated that
only NF-250 membrane in ethanol extract, NF-200 membrane in
methanol extract and NF-GKSS membrane in methanol extract
could be considered (Table 5) for further evaluation. Taking this
into consideration along with the superior extraction performance
of hexane, extraction with hexane followed by reconstitution in a
polar solvent before membrane processing was examined to im-
prove the overall performance.
3.5. Overall performance of extraction and membrane purification
Hexane extract of PSC was desolventized and reconstituted in
methanol and ethanol for further processing with NF membranes.
The overall extraction and purification performance in terms of
enrichment factor, process flux and purity for the three select pro-
cess combinations are presented in Table 6. All the three combina-
tions exhibited greater improvement in purity (Table 6) compared
to processing in a single solvent system (extraction and purifica-
tion in the same solvent phase) (Table 5). NF-200 membrane
exhibited the highest purity of 206 mg/g of total soluble solids fol-
lowed by NF-GKSS membrane (167 mg/g of total soluble solids) in
Table 4
Rejection of PSC and impurities during membrane processing of A. carbonarius biomass extractsa.
Solvent
Membrane
Methanol Ethanol Acetone Hexane
Ro (%) Selectivity Ro (%) Selectivity Ro (%) Selectivity Ro (%) Selectivity
CHOb Saltsc Acidsd CHOb Saltsc Acidsd CHOb Saltsc Acidsd CHOb Saltsc Acidsd
NF-200 64.9 1.15 1.29 1.36 8.5 0.49 1.10 0.59 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
NF-250 45.3 2.44 1.21 1.01 60.3 2.46 3.54 1.26 32.1 1.09 0.66 0.53 NS NS NS NS
NF-GKSS 89.0 1.03 1.06 0.97 19.7 0.59 0.55 0.69 61.8 1.31 0.87 16.20 42.7 ND ND 0.40NP-NTGS 2200 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 22.1 ND ND 0.79
a Ro Rejectionof PSC; NS notstable; ND notdetermined;volume concentration ratio (VCR):five-fold;valuesare expressedas mean of duplicate(n = 2) measurements.b Membrane selectivity of PSC with respect to CHO.c Membrane selectivity of PSC with respect to phosphate salts.d Membrane selectivity of PSC with respect to total acids.
Table 5
Membrane performance during processing biomass extracts.
Solvent
Membrane
Methanol Ethanol Acetone Hexane
EF
()
Flux
(l/m2h)
MP
()
Purity
(mg/g)
EF
()
Flux
(l/m2h)
MP
()
Purity
(mg/g)
EF
()
Flux
(l/m2h)
MP
()
Purity
(mg/g)
EF
()
Flux
(l/m2h)
MP
()
Purity
(mg/g)
NF-200 2.8 33.3 94.6 3.88 1.2 20.0 23.0 4.08 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
NF-250 2.1 35.4 73.3 6.38 2.6 38.5 101.6 11.27 1.7 52.8 88.7 22.88 NS NS NS NS
NF-GKSS 4.2 20.0 83.8 12.11 1.4 50.0 68.5 4.98 3.2 5.0 16.2 38.12 2.0 1.0 2.0 46.84
NP-NTGS 2200 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1.4 50.0 71.5 16.88
MP membrane performance (notional) = EF Flux.
Purity Ratio of PSC concentration to total soluble solids (retentate).
NS not stable; VCR: five-fold.Values are expressed as mean of duplicate (n = 2) measurements. EF enrichment factor = Ratio of PSC concentration in retentate to feed.
D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604 7603
-
7/28/2019 d9b0077ba1619d9b185df86b0c15eb49
7/7
methanol extract. These results revealed that lipophilic impurities
(lipids) co-extracted along with PSC in hexane are eliminated to a
greater extent during membrane processing in a polar solvent
phase. The overall performance expressed as a product of enrich-
ment factor, flux and purity of PSC was also higher with NF-200
membrane (86.5) followed by NF-GKSS membrane (40.2) in meth-
anol extract.
4. Conclusions
Extraction with hexane exhibited much higher recovery of PSC
compared to the three more polar solvents probably owing to its
permeabilizing ability, virtually eliminating the necessity for size
reduction. The results revealed the suitability of a non-polar sol-
vent (hexane) for extraction followed by simultaneous purification
and concentration employing a suitable NF membrane in a polar
solvent (methanol) for obtaining greater purity and recovery of
PSC from A. carbonarius. Considering the potential application of
the proposed approach, it is desirable to conduct scale-up studies
and evaluate its performance as a primary purification process
for high purity products.
Acknowledgements
E. Nakkeeran and N. Kumaresan thank CSIR, New Delhi, India,
for the award of fellowship. H. Nabetani at NFRI, Japan provided
the nonporous membrane. K. Ebert at GKSS Forschungszentrum,
Germany provided the laboratory-made NF membrane. S. Umesh
Kumar, S. Divakar and K. Anbarasu at CFTRI and J. Jayapriya, T.K.
Raja and V. Ramamurthy at PSG College of Technology provided
valuable advice.
References
Ames, B.N., 1966. Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases.
In: Neufeld, E.F., Ginsburg, V. (Eds.), Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press,
New York, pp. 115118.
Bhosale, P., Bernstein, P.S., 2005. Microbial xanthophylls. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 68, 445455.Bhanushali, D., Kloos, S., Bhattacharyya, D., 2002. Solute transport in solvent-
resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental
results and the role of solutesolvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 208, 343359.
Bhosle, B.M., Subramanian, R., Ebert, K., 2005. Deacidification of model vegetable
oils using polymeric membranes. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 107, 746753.
Cheryan, M., 1998. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. Technomic,
Lancaster.
Das, A., Yoon, S., Lee, S., Kim, J., Oh, D., Kim, S., 2007. An update on microbial
carotenoid production: application of recent metabolic engineering tools. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 505512.
Devi, N.A., Appu Rao, A.G., 1996. Fractionation, purification, and preliminary
characterization of polygalacturonases produced by Aspergillus carbonarius.Enzyme Microb. Technol. 18, 5965.
Duran, N., Tixeira, M.F.S., De Conti, R., Esposito, E., 2002. Ecological-friendly
pigments from fungi. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 42, 5366.
Ernst, H., 2002. Recent advances in industrial carotenoid synthesis. Pure Appl.
Chem. 74, 13691382.
Gu, Z., Chen, D., Han, Y., Chen, Z., Gu, F., 2008. Optimization of carotenoids
extraction from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 41, 10821088.
Hejazi, M.A., de Lamarliere, C., Rocha, J.M.S., Vermue, M., Tramper, J., Wijffels, R.H.,
2002. Selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalga Dunaliella salinawith retention of viability. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 79, 2936.
Kondal Reddy, K., Subramanian, R., Kawakatsu, T., Nakajima, M., 2001.
Decolourization of vegetable oils by membrane processing. Eur. Food Res.
Technol. 213, 212218.
Krichnavaruk, S., Shotipruk, A., Goto, M., Pavasant, P., 2008. Supercritical carbon
dioxide extraction of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis with vegetableoils as co-solvent. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 55565560.
Krupa, D., 2009. Extraction, purification and concentration of canthaxanthin from
Aspergillus carbonarius, B. Tech. Thesis, PSG College of Technology, India.Kumaresan, N., Sanjay, K.R., Venkatesh, K.S., Kadeppagari, R., Vijayalakshmi, G.,
Umesh-Kumar, S., 2008. Partially saturated canthaxanthin purified from
Aspergillus carbonarius induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell line. Appl.Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80, 467473.
Leshchev, S.M., Sinkevich, A.V., 2003. Comparative assessment of the solvating
powers of solvents of different nature with respect to condensed aromatic
hydrocarbons. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 76, 14831488.
Meckel, R.A., Kester, A.S., 1980. Extractability of carotenoid pigments from non-
photosynthetic bacteria with solvents and detergents: Implications for the
location and binding of the pigments. J. Gen. Microbiol. 120, 111116.
Palozza, P., Krinsky, N.I., 1992. Astaxanthin and canthaxanthin are potent
antioxidants in a membrane model. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 297, 291295.
Pandey, U., Pandey, J., 2008. Enhanced production of biomass, pigments and
antioxidant capacity of a nutritionally important cyanobacterium Nostochopsislobatus. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 45204523.
Papaioannou, E., Roukas, T., Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, M., 2008. Effect of biomass
pre-treatment and solvent extraction on b-carotene and lycopene recovery
from Blakeslea trispora cells. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 38, 246256.
Park, P.K., Kim, E.Y., Chu, K.H., 2007. Chemical disruption of yeast cells for theisolation of carotenoid pigments. Sep. Purif. Technol. 53, 148152.
Pattnaik, P., Roy, U., Jain, P., 1997. Biocolors: new generation additives for food.
Indian Food Indus. 16, 2127.
Ranganna, S., 2003. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable
products, second ed. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New
Delhi.
Rao, P., Pattabiraman, T.N., 1989. Reevaluation of the phenolsulfuric acid reaction
for the estimation of hexoses and pentoses. Anal. Biochem. 181, 1822.
Sarrade, S.J., Rios, G.M., Carles, M., 1998. Supercritical CO2 extraction coupled with
nanofiltration separation applications to natural products. Sep. Purif. Technol.
14, 1925.
Sanjay, K.R., Kumaresan, N., Manohar, B., Umesh Kumar, S., Vijayalakshmi, G., 2007.
Optimization of carotenoid production by Aspergillus carbonarius in submergedfermentation using a response surface methodology. Int. J. Food Eng. 3 (Article
19).
Singh, S.A., Ramakrishna, M., Appu Rao, A.G., 1999. Optimisation of downstream
processing parameters for the recovery of pectinase from the fermentedbran of
Aspergillus carbonarius. Process Biochem. 35, 411417.
Subramanian, R., Nabetani, H., Nakajima, M., Ichikawa, S., Kimura, T., Maekawa, T.,2001. Rejection of carotenoids in oil systems by a nonporous polymeric
composite membrane. J. Am. Oil Chem. Sci. 78, 803807.
Thana, P., Machmudah, S., Goto, M., Sasaki, M., Pavasant, P., Shotipruk, A., 2008.
Response surface methodology to supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of
astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 31103115.Tsui, E.M., Cheryan, M., 2007. Membrane processing of xanthophylls in ethanol
extracts of corn. J. Food Eng. 83, 590595.
Van der Bruggen, B., Geens, J., Vandecasteele, C., 2002. Infuence of organic solvents
on the performance of polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol.
37, 783797.
Zhu, C., Naqvi, S., Capell, T., Christou, P., 2009. Metabolic engineering of
ketocarotenoid biosynthesis in higher plants. Arch. Biochem. Biphys. 483,
182190.
Zwijnenberg, H.J., Krosse, A.M., Ebert, K., Peinemann, K.V., Cuperus, F.P., 1999.
Acetone-stable nanofiltration membranes in deacidifying vegetable oil. J. Am.
Oil Chem. Soc. 76, 8387.
Table 6
Membrane processing of reconstituted PSC extract (hexane) in polar solvents.
Solvent Membrane EF () Flux (l/m2h) Purity (mg/g) Overall performance ()
Methanol NF-200 4.4 33.3 206.0 86.5
Methanol NF-GKSS 4.2 20.0 167.0 40.2
Ethanol NF-250 2.6 38.5 51.0 14.6
Overall performance EFFluxPurityany solventEFmaxFluxmaxPuritymax
100.
Values are expressed as mean of duplicate (n = 2) measurements. For abbreviations see Table 5; VCR: five-fold.
7604 D. Krupa et al. / Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 75987604