cutting spending in the us: can it be done
DESCRIPTION
Is today’s political climate too toxic to reduce spending? Does divided government make it impossible to make substantial cuts? For answers to these questions and more, please join the Mercatus Center at George Mason University for a Capitol Hill Campus featuring Dr. David Henderson. Dr. Henderson will walk you through how an often vitriolic group of lawmakers came together in a bipartisan way to reduce spending in the 1990s and explain how we can once again exercise restraint.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cutting Federal Government Spending: Yes We Did
David R. HendersonResearch Fellow, Hoover Institution,
Stanford Universityand
Associate Professor of Economics, Graduate School of Business and Public
Policy Naval Postgraduate School
![Page 2: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Me with Former President Reagan, January 1993
![Page 3: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Canada’s Budget Triumph
Federal spending on programs (as a percent of GDP):
• 1992-1993: 17.5 percent• 2000-2001: 11.3 percent
![Page 4: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Canada’s Budget Triumph (cont)
Federal spending on servicing the federal debt (as a percent of GDP):
• 1992-1993: 5.6 percent• 1999-2000: 4.3 percent
![Page 5: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is a “Cut”?When analysts refer to government budget cuts, they do not all use the word “cut” the same way. A cut in government spending can mean one of four things:(i) A cut in the dollar amount of spending even
when there is inflation;(ii) A cut in real spending, that is, an inflation-
adjusted cut;(iii) A cut in spending as a percent of GDP;(iv) A cut in the planned increase in spending.
![Page 6: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
America’s Budget Triumph
![Page 7: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Defense Spending as % of GDP
![Page 8: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Net Interest on Debt as a % of GDP
![Page 9: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Big Three
![Page 10: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Other Domestic Spending
Fell from:
• 6.41 percent of GDP in 1990 to • 5.40 percent in 2000
![Page 11: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Was High Economic Growth in the 1990s an Important Cause?
Average annual economic growth by decade:
• 1990s: 3.2 percent• 1980s: 3.2 percent• 1970s: 3.2 percent
![Page 12: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Did Cuts Hurt Growth?
Growth in last half of decade, 1995-2000, after most of the cuts had kicked in:
• 4.0 percent annual average real GDP growth
![Page 13: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Due to United Legislative/Executive, as in Canada?
No.
1990-1992: R Pres, D Congress1993-1994: D Pres, D Congress1995-2000: D Pres, R Congress
![Page 14: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Earlier Evidence: Drop in Post WWII Federal Spending
![Page 15: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Post WWII Growth of Real Private GDP
![Page 16: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Moral of the Story
Modest cuts in spending (in real terms), combined with keeping growth in spending below growth in GDP, will ultimately balance budgets and even produce budget surpluses.
![Page 17: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Where Cuts Can Be Made?
Defense spending today, at about 3.8 percent of GDP, is below where it was at the start of the 1990s, when it was about 5.2 percent.There is still room to cut defense spending substantially.
But the growth in government spending in the future will be mainly in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
![Page 18: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Danger of Our Current Debt
• Net interest on the debt is very low.• This is because the interest rate on the
debt is low.• Even a one-percentage-point rise in
interest rates on the approximately $12 trillion in debt held by the public would increase government spending by a hefty $120 billion. This is about 0.75 percent of GDP.
![Page 19: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Solution: Lock in Low, Long-Term Interest Rates
• Short-term problem: If we lock in long-term rates on, say, $3 trillion of debt, debt service on this $3 trillion immediately rises by $90 billion.
• Long-term benefit: If interest rates rise by more than 3 points, feds will save money.
• Diversified strategy: That’s why I chose $3 trillion.
![Page 20: Cutting Spending in the US: Can It Be Done](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061103/53fa6f628d7f729c2e8b511f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Yes We Can – Cut Federal Spending