customers role
TRANSCRIPT
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter 13: Customer Roles
This chapter builds up earlier attempts to close Gap 3 (the service delivery gap)
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
PerceivedService
Expected Service
CUSTOMER
COMPANY
CustomerGap
Gap 1
Gap 2
Gap 3
External Communications
to CustomersGap 4ServiceDelivery
Customer-Driven Service Designs and
Standards
Company Perceptions of Consumer Expectations
Review: Gaps Model of Service Quality
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Provider Gap 1: Not knowing what customers expect
Provider Gap 2: Not selecting the right service designs and standards
Provider Gap 3: Not delivering to service standards
Provider Gap 4: Not matching performance to promises
Customer Expectations
Customer Perceptions
Factors Leadingto the Customer Gap
CustomerGap
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customer Expectations
Company Perceptions of Customer Expectations
Inadequate marketing research orientation Insufficient marketing research Research not focused on service quality Inadequate use of market research
Lack of upward communication Lack of interaction between management and customers Insufficient communication between contact employees and managers Too many layers between contact personnel and top management
Insufficient relationship focus Lack of market segmentation Focus on transactions rather than relationships Focus on new customers rather than relationship customers
Inadequate service recovery Lack of encouragement to listen to customer complaints Failure to make amends when things go wrong No appropriate recovery mechanisms in place for service failures
Figure 2.2
Key Factors Leading to Provider Gap 1
Gap1
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customer-Driven Service Designs and Standards
Management Perceptions of Customer Expectations
Poor service design Unsystematic new service development process Vague, undefined service designs
Failure to connect service design to service positioning Absence of customer-driven standards
Lack of customer-driven service standards Absence of process management to focus on customer
requirements Absence of formal process for setting service quality goals
Inappropriate physical evidence and servicescape Failure to develop tangibles in line with customer expectations Servicescape design that does not meet customer and
employee needs Inadequate maintenance and updating of the servicescape
Figure 2.3
Key Factors Leading to Provider Gap 2
Gap2
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Service Delivery
Customer-Driven Service Designs and Standards
Deficiencies in human resource policies Ineffective recruitment Role ambiguity and role conflict Poor employee-technology job fit Inappropriate evaluation and compensation systems Lack of empowerment, perceived control, and teamwork
Customers who do not fulfill roles Customers who lack knowledge of their roles and responsibilities Customers who negatively impact each other
Problems with service intermediaries Channel conflict over objectives and performance Difficulty controlling quality and consistency Tension between empowerment and control
Failure to match supply and demand Failure to smooth peaks and valleys of demand Inappropriate customer mix Overreliance on price to smooth demand
Figure 2.4
Key Factors Leading to Provider Gap 3
Gap3
Customers’ Roles in Service Delivery
The Importance of Customers in Service Delivery
Customers’ Roles
Self-Service Technologies—The Ultimate in Customer Participation
Strategies for Enhancing Customer Participation
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Table 13.1
Levels of Customer Participation across Different Services
Source: Adapted from A. R. Hubbert, “Customer Co-Creation of Service Outcomes: Effects of Locus of Causality Attributions,” doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 1995.
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
How Customers Widen theService Performance Gap
Lack of understanding of their roles
Not being willing or able to perform their roles
No rewards for “good performance”
Interfering with other customers
Incompatible market segments
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Importance of Other (“Fellow”) Customersin Service Delivery
Other customers can detract from satisfaction: disruptive behaviors overly demanding behaviors excessive crowding incompatible needs
Other customers can enhance satisfaction: mere presence socialization/friendships roles: assistants, teachers, supporters, mentors
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customer “Roles” in Service Delivery
Productive Resources
Contributors to Service Quality and Satisfaction
Competitors
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Figure 13.2
Services Production Continuum
1 2 3 4 5 6
Gas Station Illustration1. Customer pumps gas and pays at the pump with automation2. Customer pumps gas and goes inside to pay attendant3. Customer pumps gas and attendant takes payment at the pump4. Attendant pumps gas and customer pays at the pump with automation5. Attendant pumps gas and customer goes inside to pay attendant6. Attendant pumps gas and attendant takes payment at the pump
Customer Production Joint Production Firm Production
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customers as Productive Resources
customers can be thought of as “partial employees” contributing effort, time, or other resources to the production
process
customer inputs can affect organization’s productivity
key issue: should customers’ roles be expanded? reduced?
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customers as Contributors toService Quality and Satisfaction
Customers can contribute to: their own satisfaction with the service
by performing their role effectively by working with the service provider
the quality of the service they receive by asking questions by taking responsibility for their own satisfaction by complaining when there is a service failure
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Customers as Competitors
customers may “compete” with the service provider
“internal exchange” vs. “external exchange”
internal/external decision often based on: expertise capacity resources capacity time capacity economic rewards psychic rewards trust control
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Figure 13.3
Strategies for Enhancing Customer Participation
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Strategies for EnhancingCustomer Participation
Define customers’ jobs helping oneself helping others promoting the company
Recruit, educate, and reward customers recruit the right customers educate and train customers to perform effectively reward customers for their contributions avoid negative outcomes of inappropriate customer participation
Manage the customer mix
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Table 13.2
Characteristics of Service that Increase the Importance of Compatible Segments
Source: Adapted from C. I. Martin and C. A. Pranter, “Compatibility Management: Customer-to-Customer Relationships in Service Environments,” Journal of Services Marketing, 3, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 5–15.
Summary of Customers’ Roles in Service Delivery
The Importance of Customers in Service Delivery (Closing Gap 3)
Customer Roles
Self-Service Technologies—The Ultimate in Customer Participation
Strategies for Enhancing Customer Participation