customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age september 2005 hearing journal
TRANSCRIPT
Customer Satisfaction with Customer Satisfaction with Hearing InstrumentsHearing Instruments
in the Digital Age in the Digital AgeSeptember 2005September 2005
Hearing JournalHearing Journal
Overall indices of customer satisfaction with Overall indices of customer satisfaction with hearing instruments (H.I. < 6 years of age).hearing instruments (H.I. < 6 years of age).
11
26
16
13
13
7
19
10
18
89
74
79
73
44
93
71
85
64
Usage
Wear HI
Wear HI 4+ hours
Behavioral
Recommend HI to friend
Recommend dispenser
Would repurchase H.I. brand
Quality of life improvement
Key Satisfaction Indices
Overall satisfaction
Benefit
Value
020406080100
% Dissatisfied
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Satisfied
Key customer satisfaction ratings by age of Key customer satisfaction ratings by age of hearing instrument.hearing instrument.
90
8486
84
7779
70
78
7270 69
58
66
51
72
61 62 6264
60
56
1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10+
Age of hearing instrument
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cent
Sa t
isfi e
d
Benefit Overall Satisfaction Value
Percent of current hearing instrument users Percent of current hearing instrument users reporting improved quality of life due to reporting improved quality of life due to
hearing instruments (H.I. < 6 years)hearing instruments (H.I. < 6 years)71
56
56
55
50
50
49
48
45
40
35
24
Effective communications
Social life
Ability to join in groups
Relationships at home
Sense of safety
Confidence in self
Feelings about self
Relationships at work
Sense of independence
Mental/emotional health
Mental ability
Physical health
0 20 40 60 80
% consumers reporting QOL improvements
Better
A lot better
Customer satisfaction with hearing instrument Customer satisfaction with hearing instrument product features (H.I. < 6 years of age).product features (H.I. < 6 years of age).
5
8
8
5
7
4
18
12
13
11
89
86
79
78
74
73
71
69
66
66
Ease/battery change
Fit/comfort
Reliability
Visibility
Frequency of cleaning
Packaging
Battery life
Warranty
Ease/volume adjustment
On-going expense
020406080100
% Dissatisfied
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Satisfied
Customer satisfaction with signal processing and Customer satisfaction with signal processing and sound quality (H.I. < 6 years of age).sound quality (H.I. < 6 years of age).
15
11
15
18
22
16
26
28
23
35
30
74
70
69
66
64
61
60
55
54
51
49
Clearness tone/sound
Sound of voice
Natural sounding
Directionality
Able to hear soft sounds
Richness of sound/fidelity
Comfort with loud sounds
Whistling/feedback/buzzing
Chewing/swallowing sound
Use In noisy situations
Wind noise
020406080100
% Dissatisfied
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Satisfied
Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in selected listening situations (H.I. < 6 years of age).selected listening situations (H.I. < 6 years of age).
6
10
10
9
9
9
13
11
15
13
20
11
23
13
21
90
85
81
78
77
76
75
74
74
71
69
66
63
59
59
One-on-oneSmall groups
T.V.Outdoors
Listening to musicLeisure activities
CarPlace of worship
RestaurantConcert/Movie
TelephoneWorkplace
Large groupSchool/classroom
Cell phone
020406080100
% Dissatisfied
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Satisfied
Impact of improving multiple environmental listening Impact of improving multiple environmental listening utility (MELU) on overall satisfaction; Hearing utility (MELU) on overall satisfaction; Hearing
instruments < 6 years (n=1,368)instruments < 6 years (n=1,368)
1723
15
36
53 5563
70
84 82 8491
0% <10% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Percent of Listening Situations Satisfied
0
20
40
60
80
100Overall H.I. Satisfaction
Customer satisfaction with hearing instrument Customer satisfaction with hearing instrument hearing healthcare provider (H.I. < 6 years of age)hearing healthcare provider (H.I. < 6 years of age)
2
2
3
3
2
4
6
94
94
94
93
90
91
87
Explained how to care for H.I.
Knowledge of dispenser
Professionalism of dispenser
Quality of service (during fitting)
Front office staff
Explained what to expect from H.I.
Post-purchase service
020406080100
% Dissatisfied
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Satisfied
Satisfaction SummarySatisfaction Summary• Customer satisfaction improving:Customer satisfaction improving:
73% for HI <4 years73% for HI <4 years 78% for HI <1 year78% for HI <1 year Due to 2 factors:Due to 2 factors:
50% digital penetration last 5 years50% digital penetration last 5 yearsChange in satisfaction scale (“somewhat”)Change in satisfaction scale (“somewhat”)
• Only 44% of consumers will repurchase their current Only 44% of consumers will repurchase their current brand of hearing aids when it is time to replace.brand of hearing aids when it is time to replace.
• Satisfaction with HHP is 92%. When something goes Satisfaction with HHP is 92%. When something goes wrong it is not their fault it is the product.wrong it is not their fault it is the product.
1.23 million people with hearing 1.23 million people with hearing aids in drawer; that’s 1/6 owners.aids in drawer; that’s 1/6 owners.
• Defined as 0 hours per Defined as 0 hours per year usage.year usage.
• Huge unused hearing Huge unused hearing aid population.aid population.– 1.23 million people1.23 million people– 1 in 6 users1 in 6 users
• Half of them are new Half of them are new hearing aids (<1-5 hearing aids (<1-5 years old)years old)
• And consider of all HA:And consider of all HA:– 61% use them more than 61% use them more than
4 hours per day.4 hours per day.– 26% < 1 hour per day.26% < 1 hour per day.
6
11
13
11
29
20
10
0 20 40
<1
2
3
4
5
6-10
11+
Age
of
HA
Percent of hearing aids in Drawer
HA in The DrawerHA in The Drawer• Half of hearing aids in the drawer represent a Half of hearing aids in the drawer represent a
possible opportunity for upgrade (>5 years).possible opportunity for upgrade (>5 years).• Half of hearing aids in the drawer are < 5 Half of hearing aids in the drawer are < 5
years old:years old:– An Albatross around our neck An Albatross around our neck according to according to U.S. U.S.
World and News Report World and News Report – Most likely due to top 5 reasons measured in Most likely due to top 5 reasons measured in
MarkeTrak V (2000):MarkeTrak V (2000):• Poor benefit or utilityPoor benefit or utility• Poor performance in noisy situationsPoor performance in noisy situations• Poor fit and comfortPoor fit and comfort• Negative side effectsNegative side effects• Cost of repairsCost of repairs
Reasons for Non-UseReasons for Non-Use• #1. Poor benefit (30%) - 268,507#1. Poor benefit (30%) - 268,507
““When ______sold me the H.A., I was When ______sold me the H.A., I was confident it would help me hear better. confident it would help me hear better. When I received it and wore it every day, it When I received it and wore it every day, it did not make my hearing any better. So, I did not make my hearing any better. So, I don’t wear the HA and feel like I wasted don’t wear the HA and feel like I wasted my money. I tried to return it and the my money. I tried to return it and the person did not seem to want to help me. I person did not seem to want to help me. I am quite dissatisfied with the whole am quite dissatisfied with the whole experience.”experience.”
Reasons for Non-UseReasons for Non-Use• #2. Background noise (25%) - 229,383#2. Background noise (25%) - 229,383
““I don’t wear my H.A. because I need it at a dance, restaurants, and large groups. All the H.A. does is increase all sound including background sounds. No help.”I don’t wear my H.A. because I need it at a dance, restaurants, and large groups. All the H.A. does is increase all sound including background sounds. No help.”
Reasons for Non-UseReasons for Non-Use
• #3. Fit & Comfort (19%) - 169,431#3. Fit & Comfort (19%) - 169,431““It’s hard to keep it in my ear. I travel for business It’s hard to keep it in my ear. I travel for business a lot and can’t risk it falling out of my ear.”a lot and can’t risk it falling out of my ear.”
Satisfaction RankingsSatisfaction Rankings
• 45 subjective evaluations ranked by 45 subjective evaluations ranked by average mean score.average mean score.
• Satisfaction segments color coded.Satisfaction segments color coded.• Is Is “somewhat satisfied”“somewhat satisfied” really really
acceptable?acceptable?• Satisfaction ratings actually lower when Satisfaction ratings actually lower when
you add “Very satisfied” and “Satisfied” you add “Very satisfied” and “Satisfied” and then compare to previous and then compare to previous MarkeTrak surveys.MarkeTrak surveys.
Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Ascending Order (#1-9) Ascending Order (#1-9)
16
10
13
10
9
10
9
9
7
27
32
24
30
28
26
27
20
21
17
19
26
23
23
19
18
22
21
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Cell phone
Sound quality
Large group
Hear soft sounds
Comfort loud sounds
Feedback whistling
Chew/swallow
Use in noisy situations
Wind noise
Percent
Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat satisfied
Detailed Positive Satisfaction in ADetailed Positive Satisfaction in AAscending Order (#10-18)Ascending Order (#10-18)
14
16
14
20
14
18
17
12
15
37
36
36
29
37
32
30
32
30
20
14
19
23
23
18
16
22
14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Battery life
Ease/volume adjustment
Natural sounding
Overall satisfaction
Clearness tone/sound
Telephone
Value
Directionality
School/classroom
Percent
Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat satisfied
Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Ascending Order (#19-27)Ascending Order (#19-27)
20
18
12
18
16
18
17
16
13
35
36
43
37
34
37
34
34
39
19
21
18
15
24
12
16
21
18
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Place of worship
Car
Frequency of cleaning
Warranty
Restaurant
On-going expense
Workplace
Concert/Movie
Sound of voice
Percent
Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat satisfied
Detailed Positive Satisfaction in ADetailed Positive Satisfaction in AAscending Order (#28-36)Ascending Order (#28-36)
26
19
20
18
21
22
18
16
16
38
48
44
45
41
40
42
40
39
21
11
15
10
22
19
17
19
23
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Benefit
Visibility
Reliability
Packaging
Small groups
T.V.
Listening to music
Leisure activities
Outdoors
Percent
Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat satisfied
Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Detailed Positive Satisfaction in Ascending Order (#37-45)Ascending Order (#37-45)
51
51
51
44
43
44
37
30
26
35
35
33
39
37
33
40
47
46
8
8
8
8
11
9
13
12
14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Professional HHP
Knowledge HHP
Quality service HHP
Front office staff
Create expectations
Post-purchase service
One-on-one
Ease/battery change
Fit/comfort
Percent
Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat satisfied
Multiple Environmental Listening Utility (MELU) is Multiple Environmental Listening Utility (MELU) is the key to improving overall overall satisfaction. the key to improving overall overall satisfaction.
Hearing instruments < 6 years (n=1,368)Hearing instruments < 6 years (n=1,368)
1723
15
36
53 5563
70
84 82 8491
0% <10% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Percent of Listening Situations Satisfied
0
20
40
60
80
100Overall H.I. Satisfaction
Factors Correlated with DigitalFactors Correlated with Digital• HIA statistics demonstrate 50% digital HIA statistics demonstrate 50% digital
penetration previous 5 years.penetration previous 5 years.• MarkeTrak survey presents consumer MarkeTrak survey presents consumer
with a number of product features for with a number of product features for which consumer responds:which consumer responds:– ““Yes”, “No”, “Not sure”Yes”, “No”, “Not sure”– HA purchased last 5 yearsHA purchased last 5 years– MarkeTrak consumer indicates – 47% digital.MarkeTrak consumer indicates – 47% digital.
• Compare “Yes” with “No”.Compare “Yes” with “No”.
Factors Correlated with DigitalFactors Correlated with Digital• One negativeOne negative
– Ease of volume adjustment (-11%)Ease of volume adjustment (-11%)
• 20% + difference:20% + difference:– Comfort with loud soundsComfort with loud sounds
• 15-19% + difference15-19% + difference– Sound quality (fidelity)Sound quality (fidelity)– Whistling/feedbackWhistling/feedback– WorkplaceWorkplace– Use in noisy situationsUse in noisy situations– Wind noiseWind noise
Factors Correlated with DigitalFactors Correlated with Digital
• 11-14% + difference11-14% + difference– Soft sounds audibleSoft sounds audible– Telephone and cellphoneTelephone and cellphone– Clarity of soundClarity of sound– Sound of voiceSound of voice– Natural soundingNatural sounding– Chewing/swallowingChewing/swallowing– Overall satisfactionOverall satisfaction– Localization of soundLocalization of sound– Leisure activitiesLeisure activities
Satisfaction & HL SeveritySatisfaction & HL Severity
• User population divided into Quintiles based User population divided into Quintiles based on factor scores of:on factor scores of:– # ears impaired# ears impaired– Perception of HLPerception of HL– Unaided APHAB (with exception of AV)Unaided APHAB (with exception of AV)– Gallaudet ScaleGallaudet Scale
• Difference scoresDifference scores– Quintile 1 (bottom 20% on subjective hearing loss)Quintile 1 (bottom 20% on subjective hearing loss)– Quintile 5 (Top 20% on subjective hearing loss) Quintile 5 (Top 20% on subjective hearing loss)
Largest DifferencesLargest Differences
• 25% + difference25% + difference– Cell phoneCell phone
• 15-19% difference15-19% difference– Comfort with loud soundsComfort with loud sounds– Able to hear soft soundsAble to hear soft sounds– School/classroom usageSchool/classroom usage– Wind noiseWind noise– Large GroupLarge Group– TelephoneTelephone– Concert/movieConcert/movie– DirectionalityDirectionality– Listening to MusicListening to Music
• 11-14% difference11-14% difference– TVTV– Place of worshipPlace of worship– Leisure activitiesLeisure activities– Whistling/feedbackWhistling/feedback– WorkplaceWorkplace– Use in noisy situationsUse in noisy situations– Richness soundRichness sound– RestaurantRestaurant– CarCar– OutdoorsOutdoors– Natural soundingNatural sounding