cusp communication & teamwork tools · • cusp improvement tools are designed for bedside...
TRANSCRIPT
6/20/2011
1
Welcome to CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools
Coaching Call 1
The session will begin shortly.
To access the audio for the session,
Dial: 800-977-8002, Participant code 083842#.
The materials for this coaching call can be downloaded from the CUSP
Communication & Teamwork Tools password-protected web page. Directions
for how to access this web page can be found on each of the coaching call
meeting notices (appointments) sent to you.
The phone lines will be open during the presentation. Please keep your phone
on mute unless you are asking a question. If you do not have a mute function
on your phone, you can press *6 to mute your phone (and *6 again to unmute
if you want to ask a question). PLEASE DO NOT PUT YOUR PHONE ON HOLD!!!
If you experience any problems, please call Marilyn Nichols at the MOCPS office
at 573-636-1014, ext 221 or [email protected].
CUSP Communication &
Teamwork Tools
Pat Posa RN, BSN, MSA Kimberly O’Brien, MHA
System Performance Improvement Leader Project Manager
St. Joseph Mercy Health System Missouri Center for Patient Safety
Ann Arbor, MI Jefferson City, MO
[email protected] [email protected]
Coaching Call 1: Getting StartedLearning from Another Defect,
Assessing Current Rounding Practices, and
Exploring Structured Huddles
June 21, 2011
Document 1
6/20/2011
2
Participating Hospitals1. Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital, St. Peters
2. Capital Region Medical Center, Jefferson City
3. Community Hospital – Fairfax, Fairfax
4. Fitzgibbon Hospital, Marshall
5. Jefferson Regional Medical Center, Festus
6. Missouri Southern Healthcare, Dexter
7. Ozarks Medical Center, West Plains
8. Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis
9. St. Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City
10. St. John’s Mercy Hospital, Washington
11. St. Luke’s Rehabilitation Hospital, Chesterfield
12. St. Mary’s Health Center, Jefferson City
13. Texas County Memorial Hospital, Houston
3
Documents for this Session(All can downloaded from the CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools password-protected web site. Detailed instructions are
located on each of the coaching call meeting notices/appointments emailed to you by Kimberly O’Brien)
1. This PowerPoint presentation
2. Monthly Team Leader Checklist
3. Sample Agenda for June/July CUSP Team Meeting
4. MDR and Improving Teamwork Article
5. MDR and ICU Mortality Article
6. Lakeland Hospital Experience – daily rounds/goals
7. SJMHS Interdisciplinary Rounds Checklist
8. Henry Ford Health System Daily Goals Checklist
9. Improving Communication Using Daily Goals Article
10. Effective Communication Daily Goals Article
11. An audio file recording of this session will be emailed to
you shortly after the call today4
6/20/2011
3
Agenda
• Describe the project organization and goals of CUSP
Communications & Teamwork Tools
• Brief overview of CUSP
• Review Learn from a Defect
• Overview of Multidisciplinary Rounds with Daily
Goals
• Overview of Structured Huddles
• Identify next steps
• Answer questions
5
CUSP Communication & Teamwork ToolsProject Organization
• Monthly coaching calls will be held every third Tuesday of the month, from 12-1pm (beginning on 6/21/2011)
• Six coaching calls
• Coaching calls will be recorded
• Facilitated by Pat Posa, RN, BSN, MSA
• Team leaders will be provided agendas and materials for monthly unit team meetings (can be modified)
• Project deliverables: At end of 6 months, each unit will have implemented multidisciplinary rounds and/or huddles, and solved at least one defect– Submit Case Summary from Learning from a Defect Tool to
MOCPS by November 30, 2011
6
6/20/2011
4
CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools
Prerequisites & Goals
• Prerequisites
– The Basics of CUSP
– Functioning CUSP team in place
– Executive and physician support
• Goals
– To implement multidisciplinary rounds (with daily goals) in
each participating unit
– To implement structured huddles in each participating unit
– To solve one defect, using the “Learning from a Defect”
methodology (introduced during The Basics of CUSP)
7
Unit-Based Patient Safety Culture
• Patient safety and quality happens at the local
level
• Build capacity at unit level to tackle multiple
problems
• Build capacity at the leadership level to
support unit-based safety culture
• Raise the quality and safety bar on the units
• Surviving the tsunami!
8
6/20/2011
5
Components of CUSP
1. Form a unit CUSP team with executive
sponsorship
2. Measure unit culture
3. Educate staff on Science of Safety
4. Identify defects using the Staff Safety
Assessment; prioritize defects
5. Learn from one defect per quarter
6. Implement team/communication tools
9
How is CUSP different?
• CUSP identifies problem areas –
– what staff think are impeding patient care vs. what
managers/directors think are priority areas
• CUSP improvement tools are designed for bedside
caregivers – easy for busy staff to use
– unit drives its own quality
• Lean/Six Sigma/CQI – focus more on streamlining the
process than identifying the problem areas
• CUSP can complement other quality improvement
methods – must use multiple tools!
10
6/20/2011
6
Learn from a Defect
• Designed to rigorously analyze the various
components and conditions that contributed to an
adverse event and is likely to be successful in the
elimination of future occurrences.
• Tool can serve to organize factors that may have
contributed to the defect and provides a logical
approach to breaking down faulty system issues
11
Learn from a Defect
• Select a specific defect
– What happened?
– Why did it happen (system lenses) ?
– What could you do to reduce risk ?
– How do you know risk was reduced ?
12
6/20/2011
7
Learn from a Defect Tool
Divided into three sections:
• Section 1 asks the users to identify what happened or the
defect they want to investigate
• Section 2 is a framework provided for the investigators to
identify any contributing factors. These factors include:
patient, task, caregiver, and team related, training and
education, local environment, information technology and
institutional environment.
• Section 3 asks participants to develop an action plan with
assigned responsibility for task completion and follow up
dates for each item.
13
Identifying a Defect
� AHRQ HSOPS results
� Staff safety assessment—how will the next patient be
harmed?
� Non-compliance with a core measure
� Event/incident reports
� Issues identified on Executive patient safety rounds
14
6/20/2011
8
Learning from Defects Tool
15
CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools
Interventions
16
�Multidisciplinary Rounds with Daily Goals
�Structured Huddles
6/20/2011
9
• A strategy to assemble the patient care team members to
review important patient care and safety issues and improve
collaboration on the overall plan of care for the patient
• Improve communication among care team and family
members regarding the patient’s plan of care
• Goals should be specific and measurable
• Documented where all care team members have access
• Checklist used during rounds prompts caregivers to focus on
what needs to be accomplished that day to safely move the
patient closer to transfer out of the ICU or discharge home
• Measure effectiveness of rounds—team dynamics,
communication, quality measure compliance, LOS
Multidisciplinary Rounds with Daily Goals –
What is it?
17
Evidence For Impact Of MDR Rounds
• Research studies on the effect of structured interdisciplinary rounds show:
– Earlier identification of clinical issues
– More timely referrals
– Improved ratings by nurses and physicians on teamwork, communication and
collaboration.
• Research also indicates variable effects on LOS and cost, with some studies
showing improvement and others having no impact.
Improving teamwork: impact of structured interdisciplinary rounds on a medical teaching
unit.
O'Leary KJ, et. al, Journal Of General Internal Medicine [J Gen Intern Med], ISSN: 1525-1497,
2010 Aug; Vol. 25 (8), pp. 826-32; PMID: 20386996
(Document 4 of your materials for this coaching call)
18
6/20/2011
10
The Effect of Multidisciplinary Care Teams on Intensive
Care Unit MortalityArch Intern Med Feb 22, 2010
19
• Retrospective cohort study (using state discharge data from
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council)
• 112 hospitals
• Non-cardiac, non-surgical ICUs
• 30 day mortality
• Looked at 3 types of multidisciplinary care models
•multidisciplinary care staffing alone
•intensivist physician staffing alone
•interaction between intensivist physician staffing
and multidisciplinary care teams
The Effect of Multidisciplinary Care Teams on Intensive
Care Unit MortalityArch Intern Med Feb 22, 2010
Association Between Intensivist Physician Staffing and 30-Day Mortality for All Patients
Variable OR (95% CI) P Value
Model 1: multidisciplinary care staffing alone
– No multidisciplinary care 1 [Reference]
– Multidisciplinary care 0.84 (0.76-0.93) .001
Model 2: intensivist physician staffing alone
– Low intensity 1 [Reference]
– High intensity 0.84 (0.75-0.94) .002
Model 3: interaction between intensivist physician staffing
and multidisciplinary care teams
– Low intensity+ no multidisciplinary team 1 [Reference]
– Low intensity + multidisciplinary team 0.88 (0.79-0.97) .01
– High intensity + multidisciplinary care 0.78 (0.68-0.89) .001
20
6/20/2011
11
• Should be done in ICUs and all units in hospital
• Hard initiative to implement, especially if you have an open unit
and/or no intensivists or in non-ICU area
– Standardize the structure and process for all units
– Benefits seen even if physician can not attend consistently or at all
– Second rounds should be done in afternoon—include at least
physician and bedside nurse
• Evaluate if goals for day have been met; readjust if necessary
• Identify if patient can be discharged (or transferred ) the next
day and if so, what needs to be accomplished
• Focused first on defining daily goals and recording those either on the
white board in the room or on a sheet of paper
• Then standardize rounds—who should attend and what is discussed
• Implemented checklist or nursing objective card
Multidisciplinary Rounds with Daily GoalsChallenges and Opportunities
21
Multidisciplinary Rounds with Daily Goals
Steps to Implementation
1. Commitment by all that MDR with daily goals is a strategy
that will be implemented to improve communication and
patient outcomes
2. CUSP team takes on initiative—identify if there are any
additional team members needed
3. Evaluate current rounding process
4. Identify gaps between current process and what you want it
to look like
5. Define the standard work of rounds, roles and
responsibilities of each member and develop checklist and
goal process
6. Define metrics to evaluate MDR
22
6/20/2011
12
Standardized Work Paradigm
Old Paradigm - I know you’ll be able to figure it out.
Just get it done the best way you can.
New Paradigm - In order to have consistent results
we must do things the same way every time.
23
Standard Work System
• Standardized Work is a system for achieving a stable
baseline for a process in order to systematically
improve it.
• Standardized Work Systems are the basis for
Continuous Improvement.
“What you permit, you promote”
“We deserve what we tolerate”
24
6/20/2011
13
Current State AssessmentResults of this assessment should be entered into Survey Monkey by July 8th using this URL:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Z3KVYSQ
What is the state of rounds on your unit?1. Describe the structure of the participating unit(s). For example, the type of unit
(i.e. ICU, Med Surg, Ancillary), whether the unit is open or closed, whether or not
the unit has intensivists or hospitalists, how many beds the unit has, etc.
2. Are rounds currently held on the participating unit(s)?
3. How often are rounds held?
4. Who usually attends rounds?
5. What are the roles of each member?
6. Where do rounds usually take place?
7. Is there a defined structure/process for rounds? If so what is it? Or does it depend
on who is running them?
8. Are daily goals part of the rounding structure/process?
9. How have rounds made a difference during the past year in improving the
performance on your unit?
10. What is the major barrier for multidisciplinary round implementation on your unit?
25
Patient Daily Goals Form(Document 6 of Coaching Call Materials)
26
6/20/2011
14
Interdisciplinary Critical Care Plan and Daily Goals – CCU
Relevant System / Discipline Key: “Yes” = issues identified needing to be addressed (list issues) “No” = no issues identified (Information in parentheses is the standard patient goal –
check in daily column whether specific need identified)
Date:
Time: Initials:
Date:
Time: Initials:
Date:
Time: Initials:
Date:
Time: Initials:
Goal(s)
Patient greatest safety issue
Lab work / tests
Tests / Procedures for today
Admit Culture
Hgb Hct
K+ Cr+ CPK Troponin
HgA1C Culture
Hgb Hct
K+ Cr+ CPK Troponin
HgA1C Culture
Hgb Hct
K+ Cr+ CPK Troponin
HgA1C Culture
Hgb Hct
K+ Cr+ CPK Troponin
Neurologic (alert / oriented w/o
deficit)
� Yes � LOC � No � Seizure Precautions
� Yes � LOC � No � Seizure Precautions
� Yes � LOC � No � Seizure Precautions
� Yes � LOC � No � Seizure Precautions
Cardiovascular LVEF Measurement:ECHO____________
Coronary Cath ____________
ICD / PPM
� Yes Rhythm
� No Vasopressors Antiarrythmic
� Need for anticoagulation
� Yes Rhythm
� No Vasopressors Antiarrythmic
� Need for anticoagulation
� Yes Rhythm
� No Vasopressors Antiarrythmic
� Need for anticoagulation
� Yes Rhythm
� No Vasopressors Antiarrythmic
� Need for anticoagulation
Respiratory / vent management Date Intubated
Date Extubated
Reintubation required
Combivent / Nebs
ARDS: Low TV management
� Yes O2 SpO2
� No � HOB ���� 30O
� Smoking cessation Vent � Yes � No � RSBI
� Daily weaning trial completed
� Sedation vacation MAS score � Oral care every 2 hours
� Yes O2 SpO2
� No � HOB ���� 30O
� Smoking cessation Vent � Yes � No � RSBI
� Daily weaning trial completed
� Sedation vacation MAS score � Oral care every 2 hours
� Yes O2 SpO2
� No � HOB ���� 30O
� Smoking cessation Vent � Yes � No � RSBI
� Daily weaning trial completed
� Sedation vacation MAS score � Oral care every 2 hours
� Yes O2 SpO2
� No � HOB ���� 30O
� Smoking cessation Vent � Yes � No � RSBI
� Daily weaning trial completed
� Sedation vacation MAS score � Oral care every 2 hours
Renal / Fluid Status Baseline Cr
Output goals
Recognize Daily weight gain / loss
� Yes Dialysis � Yes � No
� No
Ready to DC urinary catheter � Yes � No
� Yes Dialysis � Yes � No
� No
Ready to DC urinary catheter � Yes � No
� Yes Dialysis � Yes � No
� No
Ready to DC urinary catheter � Yes � No
� Yes Dialysis � Yes � No
� No
Ready to DC urinary catheter � Yes � No
GI / Nutrition Baseline Prealbumin
Enteral tube feeding protocol Supplements/speech evaluation
Document malnutrition
Bowel management
� Yes � Stress bleeding prophylaxis
� No � Tolerating present nutrition
� Diet
� Tolerating TF � Goal Rate
� Last BM
� Yes � Stress bleeding prophylaxis
� No � Tolerating present nutrition
� Diet
� Tolerating TF � Goal Rate
� Last BM
� Yes � Stress bleeding prophylaxis
� No � Tolerating present nutrition
� Diet
� Tolerating TF � Goal Rate
� Last BM
� Yes � Stress bleeding prophylaxis
� No � Tolerating present nutrition
� Diet
� Tolerating TF � Goal Rate
� Last BM
Endocrine Glucose control: Goal 80 – 120, if intubated,
blood sugar every 6 hours. If blood sugar
121 – 149, initiate diabetic management orders. Hypoglycemia protocol utilized
� Yes � Insulin gtt
� No � SSI
� Glucose 80 – 110 mg/dL � Steroids
� Yes � Insulin gtt
� No � SSI
� Glucose 80 – 110 mg/dL � Steroids
� Yes � Insulin gtt
� No � SSI
� Glucose 80 – 110 mg/dL � Steroids
� Yes � Insulin gtt
� No � SSI
� Glucose 80 – 110 mg/dL � Steroids
Pain / Sedation medications Goal to remain calm and pain managed at
acceptable level
� Yes � Sedation protocol utilized
� No � Treatment
� Yes � Sedation protocol utilized
� No � Treatment
� Yes � Sedation protocol utilized
� No � Treatment
� Yes � Sedation protocol utilized
� No � Treatment
6492-016-W-2s-3 (Rev. 02-07-05
Daily Goal Sheet
27
(Information in parentheses is the standard patient goal –
check in daily column whether specific need identified)
Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials:
Activity – Skin – Mobility (Adequate activity progression, no skin
breakdown)
“If Braden < 18 at risk for skin breakdown”
� Yes � No � PT consult � ROM
� DVT prophylaxis � Consult ET RN
� Dressing, wound, incision
� Pressure ulcer prevention standard � Impaired skin management standard
� Yes � No � PT consult � ROM
� DVT prophylaxis � Consult ET RN
� Dressing, wound, incision
� Pressure ulcer prevention standard � Impaired skin management standard
� Yes � No � PT consult � ROM
� DVT prophylaxis � Consult ET RN
� Dressing, wound, incision
� Pressure ulcer prevention standard � Impaired skin management standard
� Yes � No � PT consult � ROM
� DVT prophylaxis � Consult ET RN
� Dressing, wound, incision
� Pressure ulcer prevention standard � Impaired skin management standard
VAD
� Yes Temp
� No � Readiness to DC
Arterial Line Day # ER/Elective
Central Line Day # ER/Elective
Peripheral IV Day # ER/Elective
� Yes Temp
� No � Readiness to DC
Arterial Line Day # ER/Elective
Central Line Day # ER/Elective
Peripheral IV Day # ER/Elective
� Yes Temp
� No � Readiness to DC
Arterial Line Day # ER/Elective
Central Line Day # ER/Elective
Peripheral IV Day # ER/Elective
� Yes Temp
� No � Readiness to DC
Arterial Line Day # ER/Elective
Central Line Day # ER/Elective
Peripheral IV Day # ER/Elective
Safety / Restraints � Yes
� No
� Assess need every 2 hours
� Order obtained
� Yes
� No
� Assess need every 2 hours
� Order obtained
� Yes
� No
� Assess need every 2 hours
� Order obtained
� Yes
� No
� Assess need every 2 hours
� Order obtained
Family – Psychosocial – Spiritual (No ethical concerns, e.g., end of life issues,
financial issues)
Spokesperson
� DPOA � Living Will
� Yes Code Status
� No
� Family Conf. (LOS>3 Days)
Plan of care reviewed with pt/family
� Yes � No
� Financial Services Consult
� Social Services Consult
� Yes Code Status
� No
� Family Conf. (LOS>3 Days)
Plan of care reviewed with pt/family
� Yes � No
� Financial Services Consult
� Social Services Consult
� Yes Code Status
� No
� Family Conf. (LOS>3 Days)
Plan of care reviewed with pt/family
� Yes � No
� Financial Services Consult
� Social Services Consult
� Yes Code Status
� No
� Family Conf. (LOS>3 Days)
Plan of care reviewed with pt/family
� Yes � No
� Financial Services Consult
� Social Services Consult
Discharge / Transfer Plans Long term discharge goal
� Yes � No
Ready to discharge from CCU?
� Yes � No
ECF Planning � Yes � No
� Social Services Consult
� Yes � No
Ready to discharge from CCU?
� Yes � No
ECF Planning � Yes � No
� Social Services Consult
� Yes � No
Ready to discharge from CCU?
� Yes � No
ECF Planning � Yes � No
� Social Services Consult
� Yes � No
Ready to discharge from CCU?
� Yes � No
ECF Planning � Yes � No
� Social Services Consult
Medication Review (no concerns re: IV
to PO, home med, renal adjustments, sedation
requirements, new allergies, adverse reaction,
unnecessary medications)
� Yes � No
Can any be discontinued?
IV to PO
� Yes � No
Can any be discontinued?
IV to PO
� Yes � No
Can any be discontinued?
IV to PO
� Yes � No
Can any be discontinued?
IV to PO
Other patient specific issues /
Other needed consults
AMI / ACS Indicators Cardiac Cath
ACE for EF < 40%
� Yes Plavix
� No Aspirin
Beta Blocker
ACE / ARB
Lipid lower
� Yes Plavix
� No Aspirin
Beta Blocker
ACE / ARB
Lipid lower
� Yes Plavix
� No Aspirin
Beta Blocker
ACE / ARB
Lipid lower
� Yes Plavix
� No Aspirin
Beta Blocker
ACE / ARB
Lipid lower
CHF Indicators ACE for EF < 40%
� Yes ACE
� No ARB
� Yes ACE
� No ARB
� Yes ACE
� No ARB
� Yes ACE
� No ARB
RN Signature Date:
Time: Date:
Time: Date:
Time: Date:
Time:
Intensivist Signature Date:
Time: Date:
Time: Date:
Time: Date:
Time: � Physician � PCM � RN � Physician � PCM � RN � Physician � PCM � RN � Physician � PCM � RN
� Pharmacy � RT � SS � Pharmacy � RT � SS � Pharmacy � RT � SS � Pharmacy � RT � SS
� PT � Dietary � Chaplain � PT � Dietary � Chaplain � PT � Dietary � Chaplain � PT � Dietary � Chaplain
� Palliative Care � Other � Palliative Care � Other � Palliative Care � Other � Palliative Care � Other
Daily Goal Sheet (continued)
28
6/20/2011
15
Nursing Card(see Document 7 of the Coaching Call materials – SJMHS Interdisciplinary Rounds Checklist)
VAP
Delirium
Sepsis
29
• Enable teams to have frequent but short briefings so that they
can stay informed, review work, make plans, and move ahead
rapidly.
• Allow fuller participation of front-line staff and bedside
caregivers, who often find it impossible to get away for the
conventional hour-long improvement team meetings.
• They keep momentum going, as teams are able to meet more
frequently.
Structured Huddles
Use this strategy to begin to recovery immediately
from defects---IE: falls, sepsis and daily to focus on
unit outcomes
30
6/20/2011
16
31
Components
Metric 1: Quality/Safety
Metric 2: Patient Satisfaction
Metric 3: Operations
Daily Critical Communications
Information
Ideas in Motion
How to do it?
•Beginning or mid shift
•5 minutes
•Lead by member of unit
leadership team
SICU Huddle Board
32
6/20/2011
17
CUSP Communication & Teamwork ToolsNext Steps
• Multidisciplinary Rounds– Complete Current State Assessment (See Slide 25)
– Submit answers through Survey Monkey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Z3KVYSQ
– Due by Friday, July 8th
• Learning from a Defect– Identify next defect to solve
– Make any additions/deletions to team membership
• Structured Huddles– Review the concept with unit leadership and CUSP team, gather questions
– Questions will be answered/discussed during Coaching Call 2 on July 19th
• CUSP Team Agenda (see Document 3 of Coaching Call Materials)– Choose next defect to take through the Learning from a Defect Tool
– Review multidisicipnary rounds slides; complete current state assessment
– Review structured huddle slides; get feedback/questions from CUSP team and unit leadership for next Coaching Call
– Ensure that concepts of Multidisciplinary Rounds and Structured Huddles are vetted by
executive sponsor for unit and VPMA/CMO
33
We Are On a Continuous Journey
• We have toolkits, manuals, websites, and monthly calls to
learn from and with each other.
• Your job is to join the calls, share with us your successes
and more importantly the barriers you face.
• Commit to the premise that harm is untenable.
34
6/20/2011
18
Questions?
35