cultivating understanding of student and faculty classroom expectations 2011-2012 lilly graduate...
TRANSCRIPT
From Seed to STEM
Cultivating Understanding of Student and Faculty Classroom Expectations2011-2012 Lilly Graduate Fellows:Presenters: Elise Larsen, Karl SchmittAndrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski, Matthew Walker Miller, Breanne Robertson, Artesha Taylor Sharma
Sponsored by UMD’s Center for Teaching Excellence
Co-Investigators: Spencer Benson, Sabrina Kramer, Alexis Williams
Sowing the Seeds…
• Student expectations for a course?• Teaching techniques?• Technologies and tools?• Different Assessments?
• Student expectations for instructors?• Types of Communication?
Sowing the Seeds.. II
• Do these student expectations match faculty’s impressions?
• How can we identify similarities and discrepancies?
• How do we address these?
Cultivating the Garden…• Motivation and Introduction
• Summary of (Pilot) Tool & Responses
• Audience Choice of Two Data-sets
• Misconceptions Students think Faculty Have
• Conclusions & Discussion
A Simple, Deployable Seed (Tool)
Tool Requirements:• Address areas of concern raised previously-
• Learning Activities• Learning Assessments• Technology• Instructor Communication
• Broad Applicability• Appropriate length• Sufficiently Informative• Flexibility
Participant Summary
Pilot Student Survey Instructor Survey
29%
20%28%
23%Class Distri-
bution
Freshman Sophmore
Junior Senior
73%
27%Major Dis-tribution
STEM Non-STEM
43%
27%
29%Position Dis-
tribution
Tenure & Tenure-Track
Other Instructors
Graduate Students / TAs
288 instructors across all disciplines at UMDCP
27 Instructors; 25 courses 816 students enrolled in
STEM courses
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Naming
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Names
Activities
Assessment
Technology Instructor
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
Learning Activities: Which do you think students expect the most?
1 2 3 4 5
0%
33% 33%
0%
33%1. Study Guides2. Discussions3. Readings4. Demonstrations5. Chalk-/White-
board
Learning Activities IIExpectation of Learning Components
Stud
y Gui
des
Discus
sions
Reading
s
Demon
stra
tions
Chalkbo
ard/
WB
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Students Faculty Perception Spring 2012
Learning Activities III
Study Guides Discussions Readings Demonstrations Chalkboard/WB0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
Expectation of Learning Activity Components by Class
Spring 2012
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
25%
25%
25%
25%
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Naming
Activities
Assessment
Technology Instructor
Learning Assessment: Which do you think students expect the most?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0% 0%
50%
0%
50%
0%0%
1. Multiple Choice Exams
2. Essay-Based Exams
3. Individual Projects4. Group Projects5. Written Papers6. Homework7. Class Participation
Learning Assessment IIExpectations of Learning Assessment Components
Multiple ch
oice Ex
ams
Essay
-based Ex
ams
Individual
projects
Writt
en pap
ers
Group Projects
Homework
Studen
t parti
cipati
on0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student Faculty Perception Spring 2012
Learning Assessment III
Mul
tiple
Cho
ice E
xam
s
Essa
y-Bas
ed E
xam
s
Indi
vidu
al P
roje
cts
Group
Pro
ject
s
Writ
ten
Pape
rs
Homew
ork
Class
Par
ticip
atio
n0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
Expectations of Learning Assessment Components by Class
Spring 2012
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
25%
25%
25%
25%
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Naming
Activities
Assessment
Technology Instructor
Technology: Which do you think students expect the most?
1 2 3 4 5
50%
0% 0%0%
50%1. PowerPoint2. Learning
Management System (ELMS, etc)
3. E-Textbooks4. Social Media5. Clickers
Technology IIExpectations of Technology Components
Powerpoint
Learn
ing Man
agem
ent S
ystem
e-Tex
tbooks
Socia
l Med
ia
Clicke
rs0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student Faculty Perception Spring 2012
Technology III
Powerpoint
Learn
ing Man
agem
ent S
ystem
e-Tex
tbooks
Socia
l Med
ia
Clicke
rs0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
Expectations of Technology Components by Class
Spring 2012
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
25%
25%
25%
25%
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Naming
Activities
Assessment
Technology Instructor
Instructor: Which do you think students expect the most?
1 2 3 4
25% 25%25%25%1. Office Hours2. Interaction with
Students in Class3. Accessibility
Outside Office Hours
4. Know Student Names
Instructor II: AvailabilityExpectations for Each Instructor Component
Office Hours Interaction with Students in Class
Accessible Outside Office Hours
Know Student Names
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student Faculty Perception Spring 2012
Instructor III: Availability
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
Expectations for Each Instructor Component by Class
Spring 2012
Fruits of our LaborWhich would you like to discuss?
25%
25%
25%
25%
Afterwards:Misconceptions Students think Faculty have…..
1. Learning Activities Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations
2. Learning Assessment Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation
3. Technology PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media
4. Instructor Communication Types of Communication/Availability- Office Hours, Classroom,
Non-Office Hours, Naming
Activities
Assessment
Technology Instructor
Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions
• Open-Ended Question:• “What misconceptions do you think faculty have about students?”
• 473 student responses
Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions
• What themes do you think were voiced in their responses?
Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions
• We identified the following themes in student responses:
•Dominate Themes (>100):-Student time commitments-Student effort, attitude
• Secondary Themes (~40):- Effectiveness of pedagogy- Pace and student
comprehension
• Tertiary Themes (<30):- Students goals and grades - Teaching tools- Prerequisites - Student-instructor
communication- Major or class specific comments - Other- Cheating - No Misconceptions
Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsStudent time commitments (130 responses)
“I think professors frequently underestimate the average workload of a full-time student”
“[Some faculty believe] That we are only in THEIR class and don't take any other time-consuming courses or have jobs “
“They forget not all the students are traditional college students some work a lot and have responsibilities beyond school”
Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsStudent effort & attitude (145 responses)
“[Faculty believe] That students are lazy and try to take the easy way out whenever possible”
“[Faculty believe] That our grades on exams directly correlate to how we feel about the course material..i.e. a bad exam grade means the student does not care”
“[Faculty believe] That if they don't show up to office hours/review sessions then they do not care about their grades”
“[Faculty believe] That we only want to get a good grade and typically aren't very interested in learning. Or that we should know everything we are told to learn, even when that includes minor details that aren't emphasized in lecture”
Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsPedagogy (49 responses)
Faculty believe “That students prefer an excessive amount of "easy" questions on exams in comparison to a shorter amount of more difficult questions. “
“When teaching a large class, it is easy to overlook the fact that there are individuals in your class with individual needs. Also, I feel that chemistry professors in particular have trouble explaining concepts to students. They assume that it makes sense to the students because it makes sense to them.”
Faculty believe “That PowerPoints are an effective teaching method. They are good for presentation of material, not retention. A presenter is not synonymous with a teacher.”
Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsMany students touched on several themes:
“[Faculty believe] That we don't want to learn -- if we show up to class, we are there to learn -- it is not hard to "skip" a class. In that vein, if we are in class, please -- do not baby us, do not mock us for asking questions, and do not waste your time or ours going into information that is irrelevant. Good lectures are key to a good class, whether or not the course material is interesting.”
“I think they think that if we are using our lap tops we are on facebook but that is not always true. I also think they think we don't do the reading but in reality many people do, its just that there is so much reading that it might take a few reminders of which reading we are talking about before the faculty should jump to the conclusion that no body did the reading.”
Conclusions
• Students and instructors do not always agree on expectations
• Many students feel that instructors do not value student time, attitude and effort.
• This tool provides an opportunity early in the semester for instructors and students to communicate about expectations in the classroom
Thanks
• UMCP Center for Teaching Excellence• Spencer Benson, Sabrina Kramer, Alexis Williams
• Instructors and students who participated in the surveys
• Faculty who distributed the student survey