csiro mathematics, informatics, and statistics putting people into models starting with qualitative...
TRANSCRIPT
CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics, and Statistics
Putting people into modelsStarting with qualitative models
Ingrid van PuttenCSIRO – Marine and Atmospheric research
(Hobart- Australia)
QUALITATIVE MODELSQUALITATIVE MODELS
MECHANISTIC MODELSMECHANISTIC MODELS
PRECISIONPRECISION
REALISMREALISMGENERALITYGENERALITY
STATISTICAL MODELSSTATISTICAL MODELS
GENERALITYGENERALITY REALISMREALISM
PRECISIONPRECISION
PRECISIONPRECISION
REALISMREALISMGENERALITYGENERALITY
Richard Levins1966
What you want from model? (Understand, Predict, Modify)
What can different types provide?(Generality, Precision, Realism)
One of a number of modeling approachesIf you use it depends on
Good for combining bio-physical and human domain – but philosophically – can we actually model humans?
Don’t need much data
Philosophical perspectiveCan we model human behaviour?
Metaphysics: never…!Behaviorism: probably…?
Behaviour shaped by response to environmental stimuliHuman beings perceive, assess, decide, and act.
Modellers need algorithms for each stage
Human beings aren’t reducible to any description.Transcendental nature of ‘self’ and cognition.
Ivan Pavlov (1849 –1936)
Aristotle PlatoBurrhus Frederic Skinner (1904 – 1990)
But how do we “observe” and interpret what human beings do
Do we need to know what goes on in the cognitive box (the brain) when
modelling people?
Assuming we can model human behaviourHow do we observed it?
Inductive reasoning
Based on observation
What’s next?
Inference of general principles or rules from specific facts
Deductive reasoning
Based on interpretation
Inference of specific facts from general principles or
rules
“Cognitive white box”“Causal black box”
Empirical heuristics- based agents
Formal logic compliant agents
Do we need to know what goes on in the cognitive box when modeling the way people make decisions?
Ask an economist ……
UncertaintyFaced with a problem
Gather all information necessary for rational
judgement
Make decision
homo economicus
Person acts rationally in complete knowledge out of self-interest and
the desire for wealth
Not much gain from knowing what goes on in the cognitive box
Gather all information necessary for rational
judgement
Make decision
Uncertainty
Heuristic(shortcut)
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman (1972)
When people are faced with a complicated judgment or decision, they often simplify the task by relying on
heuristics, or general rules of thumb (shortcuts)
Psychologists say we do need to know about the cognitive box
The rules explain how people make decisions, come to judgments, and solve problemsThe rules can be learned or hard-coded by evolutionary processes.
Cross fertilization between economics and psychologyBehavioural economics
Study the effects of social, cognitive, and emotional factors on economic decisions and
resource allocation
Concerned with the bounds of rationality of the economic agents
Gather all information necessary for rational
judgment
Make decision
Uncertainty
Heuristic(shortcut)
In some situations, heuristics lead to predictable biases and inconsistencies
BIAS
In other words ……Behavioural rules in psychology work well under most circumstances,
but in certain cases lead to systematic errors or cognitive biases
Some examples of cognitive biases
Decision-making and behavioural biases
Probability and belief biases
Social biases
Memory biases
Loss aversion (endowment effect) – people demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it
Outcome bias – People overestimate small probabilities and underestimate large probabilities
Consistency bias – people often incorrectly think past attitudes and behavior resemble present attitudes and behavior.
losing $100 affects your level of happiness much more than winning $100
Low frequency events (such as smallpox, poisoning, and botulism) are overestimated (by a factor of 10), while high frequency events (such as
stomach cancer, stroke, and heart disease) are underestimated
(Lichtenstein et al. 1978
False consensus bias – People tend to overestimate the degree to which others agree with them
How do we know cognitive biases happen?
Anchoring – the tendency of people to rely too heavily, or "anchor," on one trait or piece of information when making decisions
Do experiments with people to find out how they might behave in different situations
Guess the percentage of African nations that are members of the United Nations
Was it more or less than 10%
Was it more or less than 65% 45% on average
25% on average
Before the experiment
People with higher numbers (e.g. 85) 60 to 120% higher payment
offered for the goods by people with higher numbersPeople with lower
numbers (e.g 20)
Consider whether you would pay this number of dollars for items value (e.g. wine, chocolate, computer equipment) with an unknown
Question
Question
Group 2
Group 1
Group 2
Group 1
Write down the last two digits of your social security number
Example of an experiment to establish cognitive bias
Things like confirmation bias which describes how people are more likely to search for or accept information that
supports pre-conceived beliefs.
Why do we care about cognitive biases?Raghu mentioned it – for instance climate change communication
Google search histories illustrated this:
Believers will tend to use search terms“climate change proof”
disbelievers terms such as “climate change myth”.
Both believers and disbelievers are presented with search results that support their original belief.
2011 paper on public perceptions of climate change by the CSIRO
Not only do we look for information that confirms our preconceived ideas but we also believe that everyone
else believes the same as us?
False-consensus biasWe overestimate the prevalence of our personal opinions in society while we underestimate the prevalence of beliefs that conflict with our own
78% believe climate change is real. - 63% believe that climate change is already happening; - 15% believe that climate change will happen in the next 30 years
15% are unsure if climate change is real
7% of Australians believe that climate change isn’t happening at all.
That same 7% believe that almost 48% of the population agree with them.
Some of the biases Skeptics accuse Believers of
OVERCONFIDENCE - in the predictions of their computer models.
ILLUSION OF CONTROL - Believers think that human reductions of greenhouse gases will make a large enough contribution to reduce global warming, but Skeptics think that’s an illusion.
LOSS AVERSION - Skeptics claim Believers overestimate the costs of warming (compared to the benefits).
BANDWAGON EFFECT the tendency of Believers to believe climate change is happening because many other people believe the same.
CONFIRMATION BIAS- Believers search for or interpret information in a way that confirms their preconceptions
AVAILABILITY BIAS - “because believers think of it, the believers think it must be important."
Why is it useful to know about cognitive biases
As Raghu said – we can change peoples mental models - knowing about (both sceptics and believers) cognitive bias will help
As Eileen said – we need coupled models to go into the future - knowing as much realistic information about the way we make decisions will be central to that
Qualitative modelling is one of a number of approaches to couple human to bio-physical systems
- Not data hungry- Intuitively simply - can follow easily from conceptual modelling- can be developed with the people represented in the model
As Rashid said – economics can develop incentives to change behaviour - knowing about mental shortcuts people take in making decisions will help develop incentives that work
Why is it useful to know about mental shortcuts that psychologists study (heuristics) when modelling human behaviour?
Systematically developed by Richard Levins (1966)
Sign Directed Graphs (Signed Digraphs)
Predator-Prey
Introduction to qualitative modeling
Qualitative models are based on signed digraphs
A few historically significant scientific discoveries had to happen before qualitative modelling came along
“A certain man put a pair of rabbits in a place
surrounded on all sides by a wall. How many
pairs of rabbits can be produced from that pair
in a year if it is supposed that every month each
pair begets a new pair which from the second
month on becomes productive?”
“A certain man put a pair of rabbits in a place
surrounded on all sides by a wall. How many
pairs of rabbits can be produced from that pair
in a year if it is supposed that every month each
pair begets a new pair which from the second
month on becomes productive?”
Fibonacci number sequence:1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144Fibonacci number sequence:1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144
Leonardo Fibonacci in 1202 (age 32)
Leonardo Fibonacci in 1202 (age 32)
Geometric or Exponential Increase
Liber Abaci (Book of Calculation)
Populations Increase Geometrically (e r t )Essay on the Principle of Population
Thomas MalthusIn 1798 (age 32)
"The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man"
Resources Increase Arithmetically (x + y)
Alfred Lotka1925
Vito Volterra1926
PREY
PREDATOR
Predator-Prey
22,111 birth
d
dNN
t
N
deathd
d11,22
2 NNt
N
Lotka-Volterra type equations describe the Darwinian evolution of a population
densityCharles Darwin
22,111 birth
d
dNN
t
N
deathd
d11,22
2 NNt
N
-α1,2
0
-α1,2
+α2,1+α2,1
0
Levins 1968 Levins 1974
Community Matrix Signed Digraph
Lotka and Volterra 1925-1926Lotka and Volterra 1925-1926
Mathematical relationship
Richard Levins1966
Predator-Prey
Mutualism
Commensalism
Competition
Amensalism
Self-Effect
Qualitative modelling Positive effect
Negative effect
Community matrix - signs only
Community Matrix
3
2
1
-a11 -a12 0
+a21 -a22 -a23
0 +a32 -a33
Chan
ge in
1. Small fish
2. Large fish
3. Fishery
Due to interaction with1 2 3
Fishery
Large fish
Small fish
- - 0
+ - -
0 + -Chan
ge in
1. Small fish
2. Large fish
3. Fishery
Due to interaction with1 2 3
Self effect
Self effect
Qualitative models can identify key drivers of change and predict the direction (+, - , 0) of response to change
Press perturbation: shift in parameter leading to new equilibriumPulse perturbation: shock to population or variable leading to transient dynamics
1
Qualitative modelling can be used to identify data gaps and hypotheses for further investigation3
Qualitative models are relatively easy to produce with stakeholders (next step to building a conceptual model)
What can qualitative modelling tell you – beside increases and decreases?
“…a very underrated tool in biology and social science” (M.L. Cody 1985)
Additional benefit of qualitative modelling
Assess model stability (important for assessing the reliability of predictions) – if strong positive feedback system then unstable
2
Temperature Currents
Rainfall
Wind
Sea level rise
Cyclones & storms
Clim
ate
dri
vers
Pests & diseases
Ecosystem integrity
Retained species
Emergent species
Non-retained species
Mari
ne e
nvir
onm
ent
(eco
logic
al gro
ups)
non-fishing based recreation
Commercial fishing
Recreational fishing
Marine touris
m
Charter
fishing
Traditional owners
Aquaculture
Renewable energy
Other industrial
use
Mari
ne s
ect
ors
Australian example of qualitative model Connect climate change drivers, to marine environment and marine sectors
(‘expert model’)
-
+
++
Temperature Currents
Rainfall
Clim
ate
dri
vers
Pests & diseases
Ecosystem integrity
Retained species
Emergent species
Non-retained species
Mari
ne e
nvir
onm
ent
(eco
logic
al gro
ups)
Commercial fishing
Recreational fishing
Marine touris
m
Charter
fishing
Aquaculture
Mari
ne s
ect
ors
Wind
Sea level rise
Cyclones & storms
non-fishing based recreation
Traditional owners
Renewable energy
Other industrial
use
Build same model with community members
What did we learn?Incomplete understanding of the whole system
Will help shape communication/education/information
Commercial fishing activity
Climate change
Sea temperatur
e
Retained species
Price of fish
Profitability
Currents
Emergent species
Fish abundanc
e
The pathway by which the fishers thought climate change affected
them (fisher’s mental model)
Commercial fishing activity
Method of lease quota trade
Climate change
Sea temperatur
e
Retained species
Price of fish
Profitability
Oil & gas industry
developmentAge
Alternative income earning
options
Harbour access
channel sand build up
Public works
funding
Access to harbour
Exchange rate
Imports
Variable cost
Price of lease quota
Admin. monitoring
requirements
Quota ownershi
p
Diversification options
Exploratory licence rules
Govt dept
resources
Vessel ownershi
p
Vessel Size
Fixed cost
Currents
Emergent species
Fish abundanc
e
Fishing pressure
Season
Government TAC levels
Bank lending
rules
Family fishing history
Family quota
ownership
Pass quota down
Retirement funding options/
alternatives
Quota ownership characteristics
# 1Quota trade
characteristic# 2
Work opportunities
# 3
Exploratory fishing
# 4
Climate is not only thing that drives fishing activity (fisher’s mental model of
where it fits in)
Important to understand how these things fit together if we want to use policy to change the system - improve it –
or make it more robust
Hakes model
Merluccius capensis
Yodzis 1998
Benguela Ecosystem - effects of seal cull on hakes
(-)(-)
++(-)(-)
++
++
Example of how Qualitative models can provide powerful insight when you want to implement policy to improve the system
Mc J
Mc A
Juveniles Adults
Live in shallow water
Merluccius paradoxus
Mp J
Mp A
Juveniles Adults
Live in deep water
Punt 1997
Shallow
Deep
Hakes modelMerluccius capensis &
Merluccius paradoxus model
Benguela Ecosystem - effects of seal cull on hakes
(-)(-)
++
++(-)(-)
++
--
--
--++++
• Reduced banana prawn abundance from recruitment overfishing,• Reduced banana prawn abundance from change in environment,• Reduced banana prawn abundance from pollution.• Reduced fishing effort in Weipa.• Reduced catchability from prawns remaining inshore,• Reduced catchability from reduced aggregation or “balls”.
Weipa region
Another example of qualitative model in fisheries How QMs can address hypotheses regarding reduced banana prawn catch
What happens when the model gets perturbed
Banana Prawn Subsystem
P L P A
P J P m
Juveniles
AdultsLarvae
Maturing
P AP J
N3
N2
N1Prawn food
Prawns
Predators
Example of qualitative model in fisheries
PLPA
PJ
Pm
Nut
Nut
Op
Pr
PrPr
off-shore
in-shore
estuary Banana Prawn biological
Subsystem
Example of qualitative model in fisheries
Human system
PL
PA
PJ
Pm
Pr
Nut
Nut
Op
Pr Pr
off-shore
in-shore
estuary
Example of qualitative model in fisheries
Comcatch
CPUE
Eff
$
Environment & habitat
Biological system
Manhab
Rain E
Tur (est)
Rec (est)
Rec(oce)
CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics, and Statistics – Jeff Dambacher
Tur (oce)
Rain L Sal
PL
PA
PJ
Pm
Pr
Nut
Nut
Op
Pr Pr
off-shore
in-shore
estuary
Example of qualitative model in fisheries
Rec (est)
Comcatch
CPUE
E
$
Tur (est)
Manhab
Rain E
Rain L Sal
Environment & habitat
Biological system
Commercial fishingeconomic system
Recreational fishing system
Rec(oce)
Tur (oce)
+
-
?
0
PERTUBATION
Why use qualitative modelling?
S. Metcalf, Murdoch University
Few data required – only need signs of the interactions
Reciprocal effects
Negative effect
Fish stocking
Fish populati
on
Birth rates
Female educa-
tion
Policy present
on street
Cars stolen
Stocking of rivers with fish increases the abundance of fish
Positive effect
Police on the street will decrease the number of cars stole and if more cars get stolen this will increase police presence
Female education will decrease birthrates
1
Can investigate direct and indirect interactions and their effects on the dynamics of the system
Direct interaction
Indirect interaction
3
Any type of interaction cay be included in qualitative models (biological populations, whole ecosystems, groups of people, economic variables, nutrients, social and demographic characteristics).
2
Birth rates
Female educa-
tion Wealth
Why use qualitative modelling?
Qualitative models are excellent for producing with stakeholders (participatory modelling)4
(Participatory modeling)
Stakeholders learn more about:How to structure and formulate their ideasUnderstand situation and possible optionsHow to understand, discuss and cooperate with others
Scientists learn more about:Stakeholder’s views and social behaviorWays of translating research into policy practice
Policy makers benefit as legitimacy of models is enhancedDirect integration into the decision-making processSocial and scientific validation
Policy makers benefit from what the scientists and stakeholders have learned by developing the model together and from the legitimacy
gained through this process
Why involve the community in the modeling exercise?
QUALITATIVE MODELSQUALITATIVE MODELS
MECHANISTIC MODELSMECHANISTIC MODELSSTATISTICAL MODELSSTATISTICAL MODELS
PRECISIONPRECISION
REALISMREALISMGENERALITYGENERALITY
GENERALITYGENERALITY REALISMREALISM
PRECISIONPRECISION
PRECISIONPRECISION
REALISMREALISMGENERALITYGENERALITYRichard Levins1966
Omits small effects or large infrequent effectsFunctions often vaguely definedLoss of detail in space, time, and individual organismsPresumption of linearity and equilibriumTime lags not explicit
Weaknesses of qualitative models
Approaches to Complexity
“Making the simple complicated is
commonplace; making the complicated
simple, awesomely simple, that’s creativity.”
(Charles Mingus)
Thanks to:Jeff Dambacher (CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics, and Statistics),
Sarah Metcalf (Murdoch University),Pascal Perez (University of Wollongong)