csc gas studies
DESCRIPTION
CSC gas studies. Valery Andreev (UCLA) Roberto Guida (CERN) April 28, 2008. CSC gas system: faced problems. To be fixed. Mixer Calibration - fixed Purifier : Fast saturation Changing working mixture Pump - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CSC gas studies
Valery Andreev (UCLA)
Roberto Guida (CERN)
April 28, 2008
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 2
CSC gas system: faced problems• Mixer
– Calibration - fixed • Purifier:
– Fast saturation – Changing working mixture
• Pump– Membranes - replaced by better version
• Distribution racks – Flowcells performance - tolerable for the moment– Broken bubblers - protection covers installed
• Backup system– Can change mixture ratios - use Ar(40%)-CO2(60%) instead
of CO2(100%): done
• Huge air intake
Ruptured membrane
To be fixed
To be understood / fixed
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 3
• Saturates in 1-2 days
– Could be due to high level of air intake discovered recently
• Multiple HV trips after switching ON the purifier
– Absorbs/eats CO2 component of the mixture
– Safe operation mode to adopt
CSC gas operations: Purifier
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 4
• System has been running in closed loop for YE+ since November 2007
• Analysis rack (Water/Oxigen and InfraRed) at SGX5 is running since March 2008– Oxygen : 4000 ppm (to compare with old (wrong) measurement of 180 ppm)– Water: 330 ppm ( old device measurement -> 50 ppm)
• Chromatograph measures ~20000 ppm (2%) Nitrogen – in rough agreement with Oxygen measurement by analysis rack sensor
• Big air intake, source is not identified yet
• Stop of HV on March 26
• Running in open loop mode since March 27, till things understood / fixed– Costly operation
CSC gas operations Issue: Air intake level
CSC
Status:All positive end under gas Fill modePurifier under test
Gas analysis:Before Purifier O2 ~ 600-700 ppmVol N2 ~ 0,284 %Vol (~2840 ppmVol) H2O ~ 200 ppm
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 6
First test for CSC purifier (it was already used)Regenerated with Ar H2 3%, flow 300 l/h
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 7
Second test for CSC purifier (it was already used)Regenerated with Ar H2 3%, flow 300 l/h
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 8
28-mar 11-apr 24-apr
flow N2 (%) check flow N2 (%) flow N2 (%)
after pump 0,14 0,14
66 ME+1/1 150 0,03 150 0,031 139 0,034
67 ME+1/2,3 700 0,23 450 0,475 306 0,614
68 ME+2 700 0,09 450 0,177 321 0,244
69 ME+3 700 0,11 435 0,199 312 0,276
70 ME+4 123 0,319
Measurements at the pre-distribution
Return from chambers
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 9
chn flow (l/h) N2 (%)
1 30 0,436
2 17 0,402
3 30 0,469
4 18 0,394
5 30 0,519
6 17 0,364
7 29
8 17
9 22
10 18
11 29
12 19
13 30
14 17 0,427
15 32 0,500
16 18 0,408
17 32 0,524
18 18 0,409
ME+1 (unit67)
Return from individual channel red ME+1/2 back ME+1/3
Hypothesis for the different concentration:1. Different flow2. Different leak rate
N2 concentration in the supply line:0,03-0,04 %
ME+1/3 27-30 Bypass on disk ME+1/3 27
Bypass test
Last week
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 11
Nitrogen value vs chamber overpessure
0.5 mbar 1.5 mbar
Rack # 67 0.45 % 0.475 %
Rack # 68 0.18 % 0.215 %
Air intake Independent of overpressure !- to check at 3 mbar yet
Leak test for channel 15 (ME+1/2) 16 (ME+1/3)
Leak rate very similar: <= 1 ml/min (0,06 l/h)
Do not explain the different in N2
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 14
chn flow (l/h) N2 (%) flow (l/h) N2 (%)
15 ME+1/2 30 0,505 30 0,528
16 ME+1/3 16 0,387 29 0,229
17 ME+1/2 30 0,503 29 0,540
18 ME+1/3 16 0,397 30 0,225
Increasing the flow, decrease the N2 levelSomething it is really different in the chamber
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 15
Results from ISR
ME1/2 N2 (%) N2 (%) H2O (a.u.) H2O (a.u.)
after 4 0,416 0,056 51,86 11,21
after 3 0,36 0,05 40,65 11,8
after 2 0,31 0,159 28,85 13,41
after 1 0,151 0,14 15,44 10,62
supply 0,011 4,82
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 16
Results from ISR
ME2/2 N2 (%) N2 (%) H2O (a.u.) H2O (a.u.)
after 3 0,22 0,089 52,51 15,11
after 2 0,131 0,05 37,4 17,75
after 1 0,081 0,069 19,65 15
supply 0,012 4,65
Gas channel
April 28, 2008 V. Andreev, R. Guida 17
Results from ISR
ME2/1 N2 (%) N2 (%) H2O (a.u.) H2O (a.u.)
after 1 0,102 0,089 14,47 9,77
supply 0,013 4,7