cs3505: data link layer. data link layer phys. layer subject to errors; not reliable; and only...
TRANSCRIPT
CS3505:CS3505:
DATA LINK LAYER DATA LINK LAYER
data link layer data link layer
phys. layer subject to errors; not reliable; and only moves information as bits, which alone are not meaningful. DL layer adds these, and combines bits into frames, or messages.
purpose of DL: transform unreliable physical bit stream into reliable data communications link...
PHY + DL = DATA COMMUNICATIONS MAC layer (media access control) - takes place
of DL layer in LANs (together with LLC)
data link layer : functionsdata link layer : functions
framing and frame synchronization
error control
flow control
addressing
link management
data link layer : framingdata link layer : framing
bits must be grouped into frames ( messages)
frames marked by synchronous transmission: starts, ends with a special flag pattern
groups bits into fields, subgroups; two main types are data and control bits.
several types of control bits; some for
error detection and/or correction
addressing
flow control
other control type information
data link layer : error controldata link layer : error control
3 basic techniques parity checking
simple and easy, but not very effective
CRC - cyclic redundancy check more complex, but very effective and efficient
Hamming code limited error correction; based on complex
combinations of parity checks
data link layer : parity checkingdata link layer : parity checking
to a group of data bits add a single extra bit, known as the parity bit. This bit is chosen to make the total number of 1s in the group even (or odd). Called even (odd) parity checking.
example: data bits 0011001; add parity bit 1 --->00110011
data link layer : parity checkingdata link layer : parity checking
what is the problem with simple parity checking as described? (show how to fool it)
X X X P LRC - double parity checks improve this
X X X X P
X X X X PX X X X PP P P P P
show how to fool this error check improves error probability by factor of 102 - 104
data link layer : error probabilitiesdata link layer : error probabilities
let PB = Prob [single bit error];
then (1 - PB ) = Prob [no error]
for group of N bits, define P1 : Prob[no errors]
P2 : Prob{ undetected error]
P3 : Prob[detected error]
By definition, P1 + P2 + P3 = 1
data link layer : error probabilitiesdata link layer : error probabilities
frame probabilities, parity checking given a frame, sent as a sequence of words/bytes,
each with a parity check. What are P1, P2, and P3?
NB = no.bits/word; NC = no.words/frame.
P1 =
P2 =
P3 =
error checking : CRC error checking : CRC
stronger error check needed
idea: insert a group of bits in the frame, which serve as as more powerful check.
added bits (frame check sequence, FCS) cause the resulting frame to be exactly divisible by a predetermined number.
modulo-2 arithmetic used; binary addition with no carries examples
error checking : CRCerror checking : CRC
CRC summary all single and double bit errors all odd numbers of errors all burst errors smaller than n most larger burst errors If error detected, frame is retransmitted; does NOT
correct error. both CRC and parity checking widely used; CRC
used in many network protocols, in addition to data link layer, including most LANs.
CRC can be implemented efficiently in hardware... computation done bit by bit
error checking : CRC error checking : CRC implementationimplementation
shift register, XOR gates 1 XOR gate for each “1” in pattern P, minus 1. (n-1) 1-bit shift registers example : show logic circuit for P - 110101.
error checking : Hamming codeerror checking : Hamming code
correct a single bit error detect multiple errors extended parity checking; ie, redundant parity bits
Idea: parity bits appear in positions corresponding to the
nodes of a binary tree; data bits appear in positions corresponding to the leafs. If a bit is in error, the other bits “point” to it by their related positions in the tree.
error checking : Hamming codeerror checking : Hamming code
each parity bit appears in a position corresponding to a power of 2: n = 0,1,2,4,8,16,...
bits checked by parity bit in position n are: 1. itself2. continue for next n bits (including itself)3. off (don’t check) next n bits4. on (check) the next n bits
and continue to end of message.
Example: for the data 1101100101, show Hamming coded mesage.
error checking error checking
Summary, error correction: more complex codes correct multiple errors require more redundancy, overhead. Also more
time... so not widely used in communications. do have a place in longer distance
communications -- eg, deep space, etc. In fact could be critical to long distance (time) communications
DL layer : flow and error control DL layer : flow and error control
purpose : control flow of data from sender S to receiver R, so R is not overwhelmed nor kept idle
secondary purpose also used to avoid swamping the network or link with traffic.
technique : send control information between S and R, synchronizing on buffer space, transmission rates, etc.
protocols: stop-and-wait, alternating bit sliding window
data link layer : stop-and -wait data link layer : stop-and -wait protocolprotocol
send 1 frame, then stop, and wait for an acknowledgment before sending the next.
RXdata
ack
data
data link layer : stop and wait data link layer : stop and wait protocolsprotocols
what is the efficiency of this S&W protocol? i.e., of the total time spent, how much is actually spent sending the data?
variables
tD, time spent transmitting the data
tprop, propagation delay
tproc, processing time
tack, time spent transmitting the ack.
U, utilization or efficiency of the protocol
DL layer : stop and waitDL layer : stop and wait
finite state machine specification of the protocol assuming no channel errors
reachability analysis of the protocol
what happens if a message is lost?
DL : stop and waitDL : stop and wait
to tolerate losses, must add timeouts (TO) and retransmissions data loss ack loss
finite state machine specification timeout and retransmission
reachability analysis
DL : stop and waitDL : stop and wait
what is the efficiency of the stop and wait protocol? (what % of time actually Xmitting data) assuming no channel losses with channel losses
what happens if ack is lost? (what problem does this cause for the receiver?)
what is the obvious solution?
DL : alternating bit protocol DL : alternating bit protocol
add a number to data frames, to uniquely identify; enable repeated messages to be safely discarded
CFSM specification, AB protocol
reachability analysis
efficiency
protocol specification protocol specification
protocols are algorithms, critical to network operation; these are/will be standardized, and must be clearly specified, without ambiguity, so that implementations by different vendors will be the
same, and protocol can be thoroughly analyzed (checked
for errors)
communicating finite state machines (CFSM) - a very often used tool for protocol specification
link utilization of AB protocollink utilization of AB protocol
satellite link
earth
sliding window protocolsliding window protocol
suppose w = 63: what if d61 lost?
d0d1
d62
HDLC: high level data link controlHDLC: high level data link control
ISO standard for a data link protocol other DL standards exist, but are very similiar;
e.g., PPP HDLC combines various functions of the DL layer -
flow control, error control, sequencing, framing, etc. - into a single protocol standard
HDLC standard is broad, covering several different cases
HDLCHDLC frame types and formats
I-frame (info/data) S-frame (supervisory)U-frame (data)