critical infrastructure protection: study mission to the road administration information center in...
TRANSCRIPT
Critical Infrastructure Protection:
STUDY MISSION TO THE ROAD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION CENTER
IN TOKYO, JAPAN
Critical Infrastructure Protection:
STUDY MISSION TO THE ROAD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION CENTER
IN TOKYO, JAPAN
THE ROADIC MISSIONARIESTHE ROADIC MISSIONARIES
Study Mission TeamStudy Mission Team
Dave DiSeraDave DiSeraEMA, Inc.EMA, Inc.St. Paul, MNSt. Paul, MN
Greg DuffyGreg DuffyWoodfield ConsultingWoodfield ConsultingOakville, ONOakville, ON
Pete GomezPete GomezXcel EnergyXcel EnergyDenver, CODenver, CO
Bill KigerBill KigerPA One Call System, Inc.PA One Call System, Inc.West Mifflin, PAWest Mifflin, PA
Dave DiSeraDave DiSeraEMA, Inc.EMA, Inc.St. Paul, MNSt. Paul, MN
Greg DuffyGreg DuffyWoodfield ConsultingWoodfield ConsultingOakville, ONOakville, ON
Pete GomezPete GomezXcel EnergyXcel EnergyDenver, CODenver, CO
Bill KigerBill KigerPA One Call System, Inc.PA One Call System, Inc.West Mifflin, PAWest Mifflin, PA
Dick KuykendallDick KuykendallGeospatial Leadership CoalitionGeospatial Leadership CoalitionGig Harbor, WAGig Harbor, WA
Karen LevyKaren LevyNewport News WaterNewport News WaterCity of Newport News, VACity of Newport News, VA
Mike ParilacMike ParilacUnderground Focus Magazine Underground Focus Magazine Lowell, INLowell, IN
Bob SamborskiBob SamborskiGITAGITAAurora, COAurora, CO
Al StevensAl StevensFGDCFGDCWashington, DCWashington, DC
Dick KuykendallDick KuykendallGeospatial Leadership CoalitionGeospatial Leadership CoalitionGig Harbor, WAGig Harbor, WA
Karen LevyKaren LevyNewport News WaterNewport News WaterCity of Newport News, VACity of Newport News, VA
Mike ParilacMike ParilacUnderground Focus Magazine Underground Focus Magazine Lowell, INLowell, IN
Bob SamborskiBob SamborskiGITAGITAAurora, COAurora, CO
Al StevensAl StevensFGDCFGDCWashington, DCWashington, DC
ROADIC Study MissionROADIC Study Mission
City of TokyoCity of TokyoBureau of General AffairsBureau of General AffairsDisaster Prevention CenterDisaster Prevention Center
City of TokyoCity of TokyoBureau of WaterworksBureau of WaterworksWater Supply Operations Water Supply Operations
CenterCenter
City of Tokyo City of Tokyo Bureau of WaterworksBureau of WaterworksWater Quality Management Water Quality Management
CenterCenter
City of TokyoCity of TokyoBureau of General AffairsBureau of General AffairsDisaster Prevention CenterDisaster Prevention Center
City of TokyoCity of TokyoBureau of WaterworksBureau of WaterworksWater Supply Operations Water Supply Operations
CenterCenter
City of Tokyo City of Tokyo Bureau of WaterworksBureau of WaterworksWater Quality Management Water Quality Management
CenterCenter
City of TokyoCity of TokyoMetropolitan Police DepartmentMetropolitan Police Department
Tokyo Gas CompanyTokyo Gas CompanyCenter for Supply Control and Center for Supply Control and Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Nippon Telephone & Telegraph Nippon Telephone & Telegraph Infrastructure Network CorporationInfrastructure Network Corporation
City of TokyoCity of TokyoMetropolitan Police DepartmentMetropolitan Police Department
Tokyo Gas CompanyTokyo Gas CompanyCenter for Supply Control and Center for Supply Control and Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Nippon Telephone & Telegraph Nippon Telephone & Telegraph Infrastructure Network CorporationInfrastructure Network Corporation
Road Administration Information Center (ROADIC)Road Administration Information Center (ROADIC)Road Administration Information Center (ROADIC)Road Administration Information Center (ROADIC)
Organizations VisitedOrganizations Visited
ROADIC Study MissionROADIC Study Mission
Findings:Findings: Political, Jurisdictional and Legal Aspects Economic Considerations and Benefits Technology Issues Organizational Aspects Standards
Findings:Findings: Political, Jurisdictional and Legal Aspects Economic Considerations and Benefits Technology Issues Organizational Aspects Standards
Project OverviewProject Overview
Background: ROADIC created in 1986 Response to major gas explosions Lack of knowledge of underground
assets
Background: ROADIC created in 1986 Response to major gas explosions Lack of knowledge of underground
assets
Project OverviewProject Overview
Background: Japanese Government realized need to
Develop approach to ensure public safety Improve response to accidents Coordinate road construction
Background: Japanese Government realized need to
Develop approach to ensure public safety Improve response to accidents Coordinate road construction
Political, Jurisdictional and Legal Aspects
Political, Jurisdictional and Legal Aspects
Initial implementation in metro Tokyo in mid-1980s
Expanded to 12 major urban areas (branches) throughout nation
Branches coordinate with local governments and public utilities: Gas, electric, water, sewer, trains,
subways, communications
Initial implementation in metro Tokyo in mid-1980s
Expanded to 12 major urban areas (branches) throughout nation
Branches coordinate with local governments and public utilities: Gas, electric, water, sewer, trains,
subways, communications
Economic ConsiderationsEconomic Considerations
Original Cost: ¥ 9.5 Billion, or US$ 8.7 Million National Government - 60% Balance from interested local
governments and utility companies
Original Cost: ¥ 9.5 Billion, or US$ 8.7 Million National Government - 60% Balance from interested local
governments and utility companies
Economic ConsiderationsEconomic Considerations
2003 Annual Operating Budget ¥ 3.4 Billion, or US$ 3.1 Million National Government – 50% Local government entities – 10% Private utilities and other
organizations – 40%
2003 Annual Operating Budget ¥ 3.4 Billion, or US$ 3.1 Million National Government – 50% Local government entities – 10% Private utilities and other
organizations – 40%
Economic ConsiderationsEconomic Considerations
Several benefits of ROADIC are associated with cost savings: Utility and construction coordination and
management Time reduction for management of permit
process
Several benefits of ROADIC are associated with cost savings: Utility and construction coordination and
management Time reduction for management of permit
process
Technology InfrastructureTechnology Infrastructure
Technology IssuesTechnology Issues
Other factors: Increased use of fiber optics to enhance
communications and coordination No use of Internet
Members access database directly Data restricted to members Appropriate, but restrictive
Other factors: Increased use of fiber optics to enhance
communications and coordination No use of Internet
Members access database directly Data restricted to members Appropriate, but restrictive
StandardsStandards
Not a major issue for ROADIC Total Utility Management System (TUMSY) is
default standard Original system for Tokyo Gas Adopted by ROADIC
Cultural difference in approach: North America – focus on data standards and
interoperability Japan – Approach to interoperability is using one
vendor
Not a major issue for ROADIC Total Utility Management System (TUMSY) is
default standard Original system for Tokyo Gas Adopted by ROADIC
Cultural difference in approach: North America – focus on data standards and
interoperability Japan – Approach to interoperability is using one
vendor
StandardsStandards
“Bottom-up” process vs. “Top-down” model in North America Better result, but much longer
implementation time Most advanced agencies lead standards
process
“Bottom-up” process vs. “Top-down” model in North America Better result, but much longer
implementation time Most advanced agencies lead standards
process
Business DriversBusiness Drivers
Critical Infrastructure Protection Little concern about terrorism CIP driven by natural phenomena (earthquakes,
tsunami, floods, volcanic activity) Not mandated, but ROADIC data could be used
for CIP Enables increased coordination, data sharing to
support disaster planning and recovery
Critical Infrastructure Protection Little concern about terrorism CIP driven by natural phenomena (earthquakes,
tsunami, floods, volcanic activity) Not mandated, but ROADIC data could be used
for CIP Enables increased coordination, data sharing to
support disaster planning and recovery
Business DriversBusiness Drivers
Productivity and ROI ROI/cost benefit not original driver
Crisis management (earthquakes) was Increasing in importance Benefit to cost ratio due to improved
access to other utilities’ data: ~ 10 to 1
Productivity and ROI ROI/cost benefit not original driver
Crisis management (earthquakes) was Increasing in importance Benefit to cost ratio due to improved
access to other utilities’ data: ~ 10 to 1
Primary Benefits of ROADICPrimary Benefits of ROADIC
Safety Critical Infrastructure Protection Common Standards Risk Management Coordinated Activities Enhanced Effectiveness Shared Reduced Costs
Safety Critical Infrastructure Protection Common Standards Risk Management Coordinated Activities Enhanced Effectiveness Shared Reduced Costs
Primary Benefits of ROADICPrimary Benefits of ROADIC
Enhanced Effectiveness Greatly improved collaboration and
coordination among cities and utilities Result:
Minimized disruptions Increased accident prevention Reduced overall planning and construction
costs
Enhanced Effectiveness Greatly improved collaboration and
coordination among cities and utilities Result:
Minimized disruptions Increased accident prevention Reduced overall planning and construction
costs
Key ObservationsKey Observations
The Japanese national government recognized need and took action
A consortium of public and private entities successfully created a land database – it can be done!
The ability to build and maintain a common database for data sharing is crucial in establishing data sharing partnerships
The Japanese national government recognized need and took action
A consortium of public and private entities successfully created a land database – it can be done!
The ability to build and maintain a common database for data sharing is crucial in establishing data sharing partnerships
Key ObservationsKey Observations
Difficulty in providing incentive in the U.S. for municipalities and utilities to participate voluntarily
Crisis management is the driver in Japan; very different than the philosophy in the U.S. where ROI is the driver
ROADIC provides an example that indicates that utilities don’t have to share data completely to be able to accomplish worthwhile mutually beneficial activities
Difficulty in providing incentive in the U.S. for municipalities and utilities to participate voluntarily
Crisis management is the driver in Japan; very different than the philosophy in the U.S. where ROI is the driver
ROADIC provides an example that indicates that utilities don’t have to share data completely to be able to accomplish worthwhile mutually beneficial activities
Going Forward…Going Forward…
Major Issues Facing ROADIC Reducing cost of programs and services Data and system maintenance are major
cost components Increasing ease of use Expanding membership
Data/Security concerns
Major Issues Facing ROADIC Reducing cost of programs and services Data and system maintenance are major
cost components Increasing ease of use Expanding membership
Data/Security concerns
Going Forward…Going Forward…
Implications For Replication in North America
Liability Issues Utility companies in North America
have not proactively responded to data sharing activities at this level
Proprietary agreements are the standard method of sharing data
Implications For Replication in North America
Liability Issues Utility companies in North America
have not proactively responded to data sharing activities at this level
Proprietary agreements are the standard method of sharing data
Going Forward…Going Forward…
Potential Next Step: Design and conduct a pilot study for a
national geospatial initiative for critical infrastructure protection
Pilot in several North American locations Partner with federal agency(ies), local
and state governments, utilities, other stakeholders
Potential Next Step: Design and conduct a pilot study for a
national geospatial initiative for critical infrastructure protection
Pilot in several North American locations Partner with federal agency(ies), local
and state governments, utilities, other stakeholders
Telecom
Electric
Oil and Gas
Transportation
Water
EmergencyServices
Continuity of Govt
Telecom
Electric
Oil and Gas
Transportation
Water
EmergencyServices
Continuity of Govt
Courtesy of OGCCourtesy of OGCCourtesy of OGCCourtesy of OGC
Thank You!Thank You!
www.gita.org