crisis intervention teams (cit)

27
Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT) NC-NAMI Conference NC-NAMI Conference Marriott Hotel - Downtown Marriott Hotel - Downtown Greensboro, NC Greensboro, NC March 9, 2007 March 9, 2007 Presented by Bob Kurtz, Ph.D. Presented by Bob Kurtz, Ph.D. 919 / 715-2771 or 919 / 715-2771 or [email protected] [email protected]

Upload: zeph-chaney

Post on 03-Jan-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT). NC-NAMI Conference Marriott Hotel - Downtown Greensboro, NC March 9, 2007 Presented by Bob Kurtz, Ph.D. 919 / 715-2771 or [email protected]. Lack of services or barriers to service will increase the likelihood that people with mental illness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

NC-NAMI ConferenceNC-NAMI ConferenceMarriott Hotel - Downtown Greensboro, NCMarriott Hotel - Downtown Greensboro, NC

March 9, 2007March 9, 2007Presented by Bob Kurtz, Ph.D. Presented by Bob Kurtz, Ph.D.

919 / 715-2771 or [email protected] / 715-2771 or [email protected]

Page 2: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Lack of services or Lack of services or barriers to service will barriers to service will increase the likelihood increase the likelihood

that people with that people with mental illness mental illness

will end up in jail.will end up in jail.

Page 3: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Psychiatric instability often results in legal problems…...

About 20% of people with SMI who have been treated and released from a psychiatric hospital are arrested within one year of discharge - compared to 5% life time arrest rate for the general population. Usually the arrest is for minor crimes…

Trespassing Public Intoxication Disturbing the public order Impeding the flow of traffic Drug related offenses.

– According to a recent Duke University study.

Page 4: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

High Rates of People with Serious Mental Illness in Jail

Every year, about 800,000 people with severe mental illness are incarcerated in US jails.

More than 8% - 16% of people in US jails have a serious mental illness.

Women in jail have almost double the rate of serious mental illness as men.

Page 5: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

People with mental illness don’t fare well in the criminal justice system

Research shows that people with mental illness -

Are more likely to be arrested - In one study, 47% vs. 26% for non-MI following police encounters.

Face more serious charges - Are often charged with more serious crimes than others for similar behavior.

Stiffer sentences - Are sentenced more severely than other people with similar crimes.

Often don’t get treatment - A U.S. Justice Dept study found 60% of people with SMI in jail don’t get treatment.

Page 6: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

People with mental illness in the criminal justice system continued...

Serve longer in jail and prison - Spend two to five times longer in jail and average 15 months more in prison.

Can’t make bail - Are often detained because they have no income and can’t make bail.

Have more difficulty coping - Experience more fights, infractions, and sanctions while incarcerated, resulting in longer sentences and more jail or prison time

Are more vulnerable - To being exploited or manipulated by other inmates. A recent NC found people with Mental Illness are 3 X more likely to be victims of violent crime than people without Mental Illness.

Page 7: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Jail diversion =

Avoiding or radically reducing jail Avoiding or radically reducing jail time by using community-based time by using community-based treatment as an alternative.treatment as an alternative.

Page 8: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Two Categories Of Two Categories Of Jail Diversion InitiativesJail Diversion Initiatives

Pre-booking - Pre-booking - Provide community based alternatives to arrest and incarceration. Most include a 24 hour crisis unit with a no refusal policy for law enforcement.

Post-booking - Post-booking - Following arrest and with the agreement of the court, involvement in treatment in the community.

Page 9: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Where Diversion Can Occur

R

The earlier the diversion is in the criminal justice process, the better!

Arrest Booking Court ProbationJail orPrison

Release andplanning toreturn tocommunity

Preventionof Arrest

DiversionBeforeBooking

DiversionBeforeAdjudication

MentalHealthCourt

Cost Effectiveness of Intervention

Violation of Rights

Page 10: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Continuum of jail diversion services.

Interaction with police

Pre-booking diversion

(to crisis unit or other community service)

JailCourt

Post-booking diversion

Mental health court

Not diverted

Released to community after sentence is served

Page 11: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Models of Pre-booking Initiatives Comprehensive Advanced Response

Training model - traditional police response. 1st Responder Model

Memphis Crisis Intervention Team (CIT): Uses specially selected officers trained to assess and

respond to people with mental illness. Expertise Model

Mobile Crisis Teams (MCT) MH profs provide secondary response. LEOs call MCT

for assistance if mental illness is suspected. Mental Health Profs imbedded in Police Dept.

MH profs employed by the police to provide on-site and telephone consultations to officers.

Page 12: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Comprehensive Advance ResponseComprehensive Advance Response

A training model with traditional response. All LEOs receive 40 hours of extra training on

mental illness. No special unit or procedures established.

Page 13: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Mobile Crisis Teams (MCT)

Expertise Model Civilian professionals provide the on-site response

when called by LEOs to a scene where a situation involving a person with mental illness is suspected.

Some MCT provide transportation after the intervention.

Can provide follow-up to assure linkage / stability Can ease police discomfort in dealing with people

with psychiatric problems. Can bring more training / expertise to bear on a

crisis situation.

Page 14: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Issues with Issues with Mobile Crisis Teams Mobile Crisis Teams

Police need to be willing to call the MCT Frequent meetings are needed

To clarify and re-clarify roles and responsibilities. To review critical situations with law enforcement

and debrief - learn from each other and the event. Communication with Officer in Charge is critical.

Trust & respect between MCT and LEO is needed MCT needs to defer re: safety issues. MCT needs to give immediate priority to LEO calls.

Should be available 24 / 7. Cell phones in cars can help

Page 15: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Mental Health workers in law enforcement agencies

Licensed mental health professionals work are employed by the police.

May or may not be sworn LEOs Usually are secondary responders (not primary

responders) to situations. May provide linkage to services following the crisis Often have lots of other duties related to their

mental health expertise (I.e., domestic violence, dealing with victims / families re: deaths, etc.)

Page 16: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Reasons for choosing the CIT model Police can provide immediate response

Police can de-escalate potentially violent encounters - or deal with them if the situation turns violent

Police provide 24 / 7 coverage

Police is who the public calls

Page 17: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

When law enforcement responds to calls on people with mental illness...

The arrest rate is 20% when no specialized response exists.

The arrest rate is 7% when some form of specialized response exists.

The arrest rate for the Memphis CIT program is just 2%. Percent of incidents resolved on scene = 23% Percent of incidents resulting in the person

being transported to a crisis unit = 75%

Page 18: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Comparisons of pre-booking models Three models were examined to determine the

proportion of police “mental disturbance” calls that resulted in a specialized response.

The results…. Birmingham MH “imbedded” model - 28% Knoxville mobile crisis model - 40% Memphis CIT model - 95%

• Steadman, H., et.al, Comparing outcomes of major models of police responses to mental health emergencies. Psychiatric Services, May 2000.

Page 19: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

CIT Training Didactic

Formal lectures on mental illness medications and crisis intervention

Dialogues with Consumers To reduce stigma and help

officers see people with MI as similar to them

Experiential Use of role plays,

practicing skills at de-escalation.

Page 20: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

CIT is a win, win, win propositionCIT is a win, win, win proposition!

For the CommunityFor the Community:. Costs are reduced as consumers are diverted

from expensive arrest and jail into less expensive and more effective community treatment.

Mental health and co-occurring substance abuse problems are addressed sooner and more consistently.

The cycle of homelessness / jail is interrupted.

Page 21: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

CIT is a win, win, win propositionCIT is a win, win, win proposition!

For ConsumersFor Consumers: Better relationships are developed

between consumers and law enforcement officers.

The stigma of unnecessary incarceration in local jails is removed.

Consumers receive more timely, efficient, and therapeutic assessments and treatment.

Page 22: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

CIT is a win, win, win propositionCIT is a win, win, win proposition!

For Law enforcementFor Law enforcement: Specialized training enhances community

policing efforts. Risk of injury is significantly reduced. Jailers do not have to contend with

inappropriately incarcerated individuals who are difficult and costly to serve.

Page 23: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

“ “For many law enforcement agencies, For many law enforcement agencies, policy change often comes only on the heels policy change often comes only on the heels of a lawsuit or an embarrassing major of a lawsuit or an embarrassing major incident. However, instead of waiting for incident. However, instead of waiting for that fatal police shooting or the federal that fatal police shooting or the federal investigation for excessive force, law investigation for excessive force, law enforcement leaders should go on the enforcement leaders should go on the offensive, be proactive, and implement offensive, be proactive, and implement policy that will help mitigate a plaintiff’s policy that will help mitigate a plaintiff’s civil claim.” civil claim.” - Article on CIT model- Article on CIT model

- FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July 2004- FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July 2004

Page 24: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Outcomes for Memphis CIT model Reduces officer’s and consumer’s injury rate. Reduces need for lethal force. Prevents unnecessary incarceration of people with

mental illness. Improves officer’s de-escalation skills. Increases officer’s knowledge of mental illness. Provides officers with knowledge of community

resources. Decreases time officers spend in the ER or crisis unit. Reduces fear / myths / stigma of mental illness among

law enforcement. Improves law enforcement / mental health / advocacy

partnerships.

Page 25: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

CIT in North Carolina in 2007

Ala ma nc eAle xan de r

Alleg h an y

An son

Ash e

Ave ry

Be au for t

Be rtie

Bla de n

Bru n swick

Bu nco m be

Bu rke

Ca ba rr us

Ca ldwe ll

Ca md en

Ca rte re t

Ca swe ll

Ca ta wba Ch at ha m

Ch er oke e

Ch owa n

Cla y

Cle vela n d

Co lum bu s

Cr ave n

Cu mb er lan d

Cu rr ituc k

Da reDa vids on

Da vie

Du plin

Du rh am

Ed ge com b e

For sythFra nklin

G ast on

G ate s

G rah a m

G ran ville

G ree n e

G uilfo rd

Ha lifax

Ha rn et t

Ha ywo od

He nd er so n

He rtf or d

Ho ke

Hyd e

Ir ed ell

Ja ckso n

Jo hn sto n

Jo ne s

L ee

L en oir

L inco ln

M aco n

M ad isonM ar tin

M cDo well

M eck len bu rg

M itch ell

M on tg om er y

M oo re

Na sh

Ne w

Ha n ove r

No rth a mp to n

O nslo w

O ran g e

Pa mlico

Pa squ ot an k

Pe nd er

Pe rq uim an s

Pe rso n

Pitt

Po lk

Ra nd olp h

Rich m on d

Ro be so n

Ro ckin gh am

Ro wan

Ru th er for d

Sa mp so n

Sco tla nd

Sta nly

Sto ke sSu rry

Swa in

Tra nsy lvan ia

Tyrr ell

Un ion

Va nce

Wa ke

Wa rr en

Wa shin g ton

Wa ta ug a

Wa yne

Wilke s

Wilso n

Ya dkin

Ya nce y

CIT training program

Some CIT trained officers

CIT in development

Page 26: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

Awards / Recognition for the Awards / Recognition for the Wake CIT programWake CIT program

Program of Excellence: Partnerships to improve community services - NC Council of Community Programs

Described as a “Ray of hope in the system” - News & Observer article by Verla Insko - State representative and chairwoman of the House Committee on Mental Health Reform.

Page 27: Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT)

For More Information about Jail DiversionFor More Information about Jail Diversion The Tapa Center is the organization contracted by SAMSHA to

provide technical assistance to jail diversion programs. Contact them at: www.tapacenter.org or (866) 518-8272

The GAINS Center is a national organization that collects and disseminates information about effective services for people with co-occurring disorders in contact with the justice system. Access them at: www.gainscenter.com

The Consensus Project is an national effort to provide information, research and support to organizations attempting to help people with mental illness in the criminal justice system. It is sponsored by the Council of State Governments. They may be reached and their report downloaded at: www.consensusproject.org

Or [email protected] or 919 / 715-2771