criminal law charts
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
Self Defense Proportional, human threat, unlawful, imminent, necessary, and have an honest and reasonable belief.No retreat rule, Aggressor Limit, case doctrine, imperfect SD (didn’t retreat or unreasonable)
Immediately Necessary (rather than imminent) Subjective belief (no reasonable requirement) Retreat Rule (complete safety)Imperfect SD (reckless or negligence crime instead)
Defense of others Intervenor must be correct (or reasonably appear justified), other person’s shoes doctrine
Subjective belief, must be proportional response, believe other is justified in self defense and believe intervention is necessary
Effectuation of Arrest Deadly force okak if reasonable necessary, offense must be a forcible felony, must give notice of arrest and must be correct (mistake no excuse)
Deadly force never available to private persons. Only for police if for a felony, no risk to bystanders and there is a substantial risk to others if arrest is delayed
Crime Prevention Deadly force is okay to prevent ay felony and deadly force is reasonably necessary. Narrow/Majority view - only for atrocious/forcible felonies
Deadly force okay if substantial risk that suspect will cause death or s.b.i. To another (or has already) and deadly force present no risk to bystanders.
Necessity/Justification Clear and imminent danger, reasonable person think that action effective to abate danger, no legal alternative, choose lesser evil, lawmakers must not have anticipated situation, clean hands, natural force (some), not for homicide
If it is necessary, chose lesser evil, no legislative intent to exclude your choice, no imminency req., no clean hands req., no natural forces req.
![Page 2: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
Duress/Excuse Human threat (kill or s.b.i.) Reasonable believes threat, threat is present imminent impending, no reasonable escape, clean hands, no defense to intentional killing but could be mitigation to manslaughter
Human threat, unlawful force, person or reasonable firmness been unable to resist threat of death or s.b.i., unavailable if recklessly in situation but ok for negligently.
Mens Rea Actus Reus Merger Defenses Misc
Attempt CL- Specific intent MPC - Purposely or knowingly (complete attempt)
CL - substantial step beyond mere preparation.MPC-substantial step, conduct strongly corroborative of crim. purpose
Yes CL - hybrid legal imposs., abandonment (only in some) Legal impossibilityMPC-pure legal imposs.,abandonment
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
Solicitation CL- specific intentMPC-purpose
CL-communicated solicitationMPC- solicit to commit/attempt crime, uncomm. ok
Yes CL - no defenseMPC - abandonment (try to stop crime)
CL - solicitor cannot commit crime himself
![Page 3: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
Conspiracy CL- dual intent, Purpose or infer from knowledge MPC -purpose only
CL-agreement, crimes +, no overt actMPC-agreement to crime only, overt acts (except 1st/2nd Fs)
CL- noMPC- Yes unless conspiracy has uncommitted crimes
CL- whartons rule, legislative exemption, Abandonment (for future liability)MPC-abandonment (stop crime) legislative exemption
CL-pluralityMPC- unilateralCL - Pinkerton (within scope and foreseeable consequence)MPC-must be accomplice of crime or not liability --> conspiracy
Accomplice CL- dual intent (or just have mental state for crime)MPC-purpose
CL-must in fact aid, any aid sufficesMPC-any aid, even if ineffectual (Attempt to aid, agreeing to aid
N/a CL- abandonment (must neutralize) Legis. ExemptionMPC-victim, inevitable incident, abandonment (must neutralize)
CL-natural and probable consequences, non-proxyable offenses, MPC rejects both.
![Page 4: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
MurderCommon law
CL def- intentional killing of human being by another human being with malice aforethgouth
CL degrees
Involuntary mans
Voluntary man
Mens rea:
Malice aforethought- intent ot kill- intent to ocmmit griev bodily injury-abandoned or malig heart- depraved heart
Actus: intentional killing by another human being
Defenses:
Self defense
Diminished capac-?
Insanity
Adequate provacation in heat of passion
![Page 5: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
MurderMPC
Criminal homicide when commited purposely, knowingly, or extreme recklessness committed under circum manifesting extreme indiff to human life
MPC DEGREE-
Murder felony of first degree
Mens rea: included in definiton
Actus reus: causing death of another human being through voluntary act
2:01(1)- voluntary act2:02-pkrn
Defenses:
Justification: NecessitySelf defenseLaw enforcementDefense of anotherDuress
Excuse:TheoriesInvoluntary intoxication- lacks substantial capacity to conform conduct to law
Insanity: 4:01- mental disease or defect excluding responsibility-
EMED: extreme mental/emotional dif
![Page 6: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
Attempt CL- Specific intent MPC - Purposely or knowingly (complete attempt)
CL - substantial step beyond mere preparation.MPC-substantial step, conduct strongly corroborative of crim. purpose
Yes CL - hybrid legal imposs., abandonment (only in some) Legal impossibilityMPC-pure legal imposs.,abandonment
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
Voluntary Manslaughter- CL
Definition:unlawful intentional homicide committed w/o malice aforethought- concession to frailty of human natureD compared to reasonable person
Actus:
See def
Rule of provocation: Adequate provacatoin/heat of passion/no cool down time/intentional killing/no malice
Cool down time=shortAll needed to get this- WORDS NEVER ENOUGH
Mens rea: intent to kill- purposefully & knowingly-
Needed- old cl1. witnessed seduction of wife2. seduction of daughter3. or receive severe battery
Invonluntary manslaughter- CL
Def: unlawful killing of another human without malice aforethought
Actus: see def- unlawful killing of human
Mens rea- negligece/misdeamnor murder rule- if osmoene dies during commission of misdeamenor
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
![Page 7: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Defense Non-MPC MPC
Manslaughter: MPC
Def:
Reckless/EMD
CL - substantial step beyond mere preparation.MPC-substantial step, conduct strongly corroborative of crim. purpose
Mens rea- recklessly
Recklessly: taking a substantial and unjustified risk
CL- Specific intent MPC - Purposely or knowingly (complete attempt)
CL - substantial step beyond mere preparation.MPC-substantial step, conduct strongly corroborative of crim. purpose
Yes CL - hybrid legal imposs., abandonment (only in some) Legal impossibilityMPC-pure legal imposs.,abandonment
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
![Page 8: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
RAPE at CL sexual intercourse by a man with a woman- not his wife against her will
threat of force or force suffiicne-but a type of force required
Actus- see def
resistance requirment sometimes needed to prove lack of consent- verbal is enough
blackstone- carnal knowledgeof a woman forcibly and against her will
Mens rea: see def implied
GENERAL INTENT CRIME
Defenses:
Mistake of fact (consent)
Insanity
Duress
![Page 9: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
RAPE- MPC Definition: male who has secual intercourse with female not his wife is guilty of rape if 1. He compels her to submit by force, threat of imminent death, seriously bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping- on anyone
OR
He substantially impaired her power to control her conduct by drugs without her knowledge
ORFemale is unconscious
OR Less than 10 yrs old
Actus: see def
Mens: PKRN
GENERAL INTENT
Defenses:
Mistake of fact regarding consent
Mental disease or defect
Duress
Consent- if you later prove she was lying
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
![Page 10: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Gross sexual imposition- MPC
Definition: Provides a lessor degree of liabilty- felony in the 3rd degree
MCNaughten Rule- CL- developed in response to mcnaughten attempting to kill member of parliament
28 states use this-MAJORITY
Def: person by reason of defect of the mind or mental disease:
did not know nature and quality of his act
OR (cognitive) Or if he did knw nature and quality of his act he didn’t know that the act was wrong- MORAL VIEWWrong- legal wrong or moral wrong
Jurisdiction:
Some states require MCNAUGHTEN + = ireestible impulse test- which is volitional- doesn’t need to be spur of moment- can build to it- (test- if there was cop there and u still did it- its irrestible test)
![Page 11: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mental disease or defect- MPC
MINIORITY
Definition: at time of conduct as result of mental disease or defect he lacks sub capacity to either appreciate criminality or (wrongfulness) OR
To conform his conduct to requirements of law
- criminality OR wrongfulness- each jurisdiction picks only one
CL - hybrid legal imposs., abandonment (only in some) Legal impossibilityMPC-pure legal imposs.,abandonment
Tests-unequivocallyDangerous proximity
DIM CAP- CL
Def:
2 forms:
1. Mens rea form:
D offers dmi cap evidence to show he couldn’t form the require mens rea-
2. D offers dim cap evidence to show that even if he did have mens rea- should be partially excused
Defense:
Failure of proof- used in mens rea form
VERY FEW STATES RECOG DIM CAP- happened after twinkie defense
![Page 12: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
INFANCY- CL
Def: Old CL7 & below- no liability- conclusively presumed to lack criminal capacitty
7- 14- rebuttably presumed to lack criminal capacity
14 & up- fully responsible
Modern CL:
Most states have juvenile courts and statutes have taken care of this- heavy emphasis on rehabilitation
INFANCY- MPC 4:10
A persona shall not be tried or convicted if at the time of conduct would be less than 16 yrs of age by an adult court- juvenile court is exclusive jurdisdictoin
**CONCEPT OF WAIVER STATUTES-
![Page 13: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
VOLUNTARY NTOXICATION: CL & MPC
CL: Not a defense unlessThe crime was specific intent and to the extent it negates mens rea-
HEAVILY DISFAVORED
Attemped murder: need specific intent so voluntary could be used as a defense to this
INVOLUNTARY INTOXICATION: CL & MPC
CL & MPC: ways to become involuntarily -intoxicated:-coerced-pathologicalinnocent -mistake-drug reaction
MPC: Same language as insanity- and applies the same as insanity
Involuntary intoxication negates mens rea
![Page 14: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Larceny- CL Def: tresspatory taking (caption) and carrying away (asportation) of personal property of another with intent to steal ie. Permanently deprive other party of posession
Custody v. constructive possession
Mens rea: intent to steal
Actus reus: stealing
Types:
1. trick- in order to get o someone to give u property u commit fraud or deceit2. continuing trespass rule- tresspasory something w/o intent to steal its still larceny if u decided to take it away later
THEFT: MPC
Def: unlawful taking or exercising unlawful control over movable property of another with purpose to deprive them thereof
Mens rea: Purpose to deprive him therefore- PKR
Actus: unlawful taking
MPC: there is theft of movable property
CL- no stealing of movable property
![Page 15: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
BURGLARY: CL
Elements: -breaking act-entering act-dwelling house -of another-at night-with intent to commite felony therein
Mens rea: intent to commit felony therein
BURGLARY: MPC
Elements: intent to enter a building or structure occupied with purpose to commit crime therein unless open to public or u have license
evidence must show that they entered specifically to commit crime
BURGLAY- FELONY OF THIRD DEGREE
Mens rea: purpose to crime therein
Affirmative defense: building or structure abandoned
SECOND DEGREE IF U SHOW UP AT NIGHT OR IF U HURT SOMEBODY OR HAVE A WEAPON
ROBBERY: theft or larceny plus force or threat of force
Duress: use of or threat to use unlawful threat- isn’t avilable if you recklessly place yourself in situation or negligently place yourself in sitation, reasonable firmness
Insanity for mpc: suffering form mental disease such that he lacks sub capacity to appreciate criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct OR To conform conduct to requiriment of law
EMED- MPC: extreme mental/emotional dif, reasonabl explanation or excuse- subjective view/objective view- provides lessor degree of liability-
Mistake of fact not available in negligent or reckless use of force:
Attempt tests:
![Page 16: Criminal Law Charts](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081809/5525df24550346586f8b49d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1. last act: criminal believes he has performed she believe were neccessaru to commit target offense
2. physical proximity test: actor has it withihni her power to commit the crime almost immediately- does require that the victim be on the scene
3. dangerous proximity test: 3 parter- oliver windel homes-a. how closr tey are physically to commiting itb. how close they are temporally to committing itc. danger of the crime
4. indispensable element: there is no attempt is the actor has not obtained some indispensable feature of the criminal plan
5. probable desistance test: the actor has committed an attempt if they reached a point where it is unlikely that they would have “voluntarily desisted from his effort to commit his crime”
6. unequivocality (res ipsa): person conduct standing alone unambigulously manifests criminal intent- objective standard
ATTEMPT: MPC: look up in slide- PG 992- IN BOOK LOOK UP SLIDE TOO!**MPC doesn’t use probable desistance but :renunciation of criminal purpose