creative commons presentation for the 2007 stanford professional publishing course (pdf format)
TRANSCRIPT
Commons?•Resources that are freely accessible to any member of a given community
•Natural resources (air, water, parks)
Commons?•Resources that are freely accessible to any member of a given community
•Natural resources (air, water, parks)•Cultural resources (creative works, scientific works, public knowledge)
Creative Commons• Nonprofit org started in December 2002 to help simplify the
development of a pool of free and legal reusable cultural content
Creative Commons• Nonprofit org started in December 2002 to help simplify the
development of a pool of free and legal reusable cultural content• Provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators
easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry
Creative Commons• Nonprofit org started in December 2002 to help simplify the
development of a pool of free and legal reusable cultural content• Provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators
easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry
• CC offers an alternative to full copyright; lets you easily change your copyright terms from “All Rights Reserved” to “Some Rights Reserved.”
Creative Commons• Nonprofit org started in December 2002 to help simplify the
development of a pool of free and legal reusable cultural content• Provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators
easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry
• CC offers an alternative to full copyright; lets you easily change your copyright terms from “All Rights Reserved” to “Some Rights Reserved.”
• Voluntary tools for creating a public good – more freely available cultural resources
• Law designed to govern creative and expressive works• We like copyright!
• It encourages creation
Copyright?
• Law designed to govern creative and expressive works• We like copyright!
• It encourages creation• It promotes dissemination
Copyright?
If you want to ...
Copy/Distribute Publicly Perform Publicly Display Build Upon Digitally Distribute
then you need to ASK.
So, what’s the problem?• Digital technologies have revolutionized how
creative works are made, distributed, and used
So, what’s the problem?• Digital technologies have revolutionized how
creative works are made, distributed, and used• Digital technologies implicate the right to copy
through the sheer nature of how they work
So, what’s the problem?• Digital technologies have revolutionized how
creative works are made, distributed, and used• Digital technologies implicate the right to copy
through the sheer nature of how they work
• The potential that digital technologies offer also implicates the right to make derivative works
So, what’s the problem?• Sometimes full copyright discourages creation and
dissemination, even though the creator may want to encourage these things.
So, what’s the problem?• Sometimes full copyright discourages creation and
dissemination, even though the creator may want to encourage these things.• It can prohibit people who might benefit from
creative work from being able to legally use it.
So, what’s the problem?• Sometimes full copyright discourages creation and
dissemination, even though the creator may want to encourage these things.• It can prohibit people who might benefit from
creative work from being able to legally use it.
• What if you want to give up some of your copyright rights and contribute creative work to the commons for sharing and reuse?
Millions of pieces of creative content available to the public for free and legal use under Creative Commons licenses
Top graphic from charlierose.com © Charlie Rose Inc.Photo and text from flickr.com/photos/jurvetson© Steve Jurvetson
CC+ PLoS
Screen grab from boletinfarmacos.org Text translated from a CC-BY licensed article that appeared in PLoS Medicine in April 2005
CC+ PLoS• Enables free and legal reuse, such as translations
Screen grab from boletinfarmacos.org Text translated from a CC-BY licensed article that appeared in PLoS Medicine in April 2005
“In principle, Curry owns the copyright in the four photos, and the photos, by their posting on that website, are subject to the [Creative Commons] License. Therefore Audax should observe the conditions that control the use by third parties of the photos as stated in the License…The claim [...] will therefore be allowed; defendants will be enjoined from publishing all photos that [Curry] has published on www.flickr.com, unless this occurs in accordance with the conditions of the License.”
Curry v. Audax, District Court of Amsterdam – March 9, 2006, Interim measure, Case no. 334492 / KG 06-176 SR
Some Rights ReservedExcept where noted, the contents of this presentation are licensed to the public under the
Creative Commons Attribution license. The terms of this license are available athttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.