creating champions: a tiered approach for faculty development & buy-in

2
role playing for an end-of-the term competency simulation. Other clinical courses in the pre-licensure program now including volunteer clients to enhance simulations include the adult health and psychiatric nursing courses. This presentation will focus on the simulation lab coordination and management required for the successful operation of the volunteer client program. Tips and strategies will be shared for the development, organiza- tion, and day-to-day operations of the volunteer client program which requires over 600 volunteer hours each semester. Share ideas and learn how one program is addressing such issues as staffing, policy and database development, volunteer recruiting and marketing, scheduling, volunteer parking, collaboration with faculty and simulation lab personnel, budget, and evaluation of the experiences. Outcomes from the Volunteer Client Program have been positive. Both student nurses and volunteer ‘‘patients’’ report very high satisfaction with the experience. Out of the over 400 students surveyed since 2008, 87% reported they are ‘‘better prepared to take an actual health history in the clinical setting.’’ Additionally, over 97% of the student nurses recommended the continued use of volunteer patients in their education. Volunteers are also very enthusiastic about their involvement and rewarding opportunity to help future nurses and improve health care in our community. Adjectives used to describe the nursing students include: great job, very thorough, organized, energetic, good listener, very professional, thoughtful, and considerate, kind, and caring. One volun- teer commented that her ‘‘confidence in nurses continues to be sky- high.’’ ‘‘Other duties as assigned: The true meaning when running a simulation center’’ Level of Presentation: Novice Tiffany L. Holmes, D.C., Coordinator of Simulation Laboratories, St. David’s School of Nursing at Texas State University , 512-716-2950, [email protected] Beth Hallmark, PhD, RN, Belmont University Gordon E. Inman College of Health Sciences and Nursing, St. David’s School of Nursing, Texas State University, 1555 University Blvd., Round Rock, TX 78665 Learning Objectives 1. Define the vague phrase ‘‘Other Duties as Assigned’’ in relation to working within a simulation center by detailing the day to day respon- sibilities and provide solutions to reduce the occurrence and tedious- ness of these tasks. 2. Discuss the ideal candidate for staffing a simulation center. Employees working in simulation are often heard saying ‘‘I never knew I would be doing this for this job.’’ Those unexpected tasks/duties are encompassed in one small phrase used on most job descriptions: ‘‘Other duties as assigned.’’ Although this ambiguous phrase will never truly be defined, creating accurate expectations are vital components to finding excellent employees that match the responsibilities of the position. This presentation will describe those other duties and explore ways to decrease unnecessary tasks. Presenters will provide experiences to prepare a new employee or employer for what is to come when working in a simulation center. Discussions will include the correlation of jobs found within the working world and their existence in the daily operations of a simulation environment. Solutions will be given to reduce the occurrence and tediousness of these jobs. Samples of the jobs to be discussed in the presentation are a Sanitation Specialist, an Accountant and a Housekeeper. Participants will gain pearls of wisdom from presenters that are currently managing simulation centers with little to no staff but have managed staffs as large as 7 or more. Their experiences in working in the trenches of a simulation lab will provide an invaluable resource to all levels of simulation employees and employers to lasso the best simulation ideas that can be implemented immediately upon returning from the conference. Creating Champions: A Tiered Approach for Faculty Development & Buy-In Level of Presentation: Advanced Jessica L. Kamerer, MSN, RNC-NIC, Facilitator Simulation Learning at Lancaster General College of Nursing & Health Sciences, 410 North Lime Street Lancaster, PA 17602, (717) 544-5478, [email protected] Objectives 1. Participants will be able to identify one challenge associated with im- plementing a simulation education faculty development project and one strategy to address it. 2. Participants will identify one component of implementing a simulation education faculty development project. Simulation has emerged as popular teaching modality in nursing and medical schools across the country. A survey of 1,060 nursing programs in the United States revealed that 87% were using simulation and 55% were using it in five or more courses (Hayden, 2010). More interactive than traditional lecture methods (Jeffries, 2005), simulation is an effective learning tool when it is situated in an active, immersive learning environment and sessions are followed by a guided debriefing session. With these growing expectations; for many prospective learners, the presence of simulation could be the deciding factor when choosing a nursing or health careers program (Turcato, Roberson, & Covert, 2008). Despite the expected use of simulation in nursing and medical education programs across the nation, faculty are often under prepared or intimidated by the technology to properly implement this pedagogy and create effective learning experiences for students. Faculty members have cited numerous perceived barriers to implementation of simulation into curriculum. Jansen, Johnson, Larson, Berry & Benner identified barriers such as: time, training to operate and manage simulations, application to practice, engaging learners, and lack of staffing in their study that surveyed nursing faculty across 5 universities on what kept them from implementing simulation into their courses (2009). Overall, the most common barrier identified is the need for training to facilitate simulation (Hayden, 2010). Despite the increased demand and implementation of simulation, a lack of training programs and standardization of education for faculty on using these teaching methods inhibits its use. With high cost equipment, shifts from traditional teaching paradigms, and technology overload apprehension on how, when, and why to use simulation in their teaching practices is understandable. The tiered education approach was created to address these concerns to properly train educators on the best practices identified in literature for facilitating and implementing simulation based education. By training educators, the aim was to also increase buy-in within the organization by making them more comfort- able, thus leading to increased usage, implementation, and adoption by new consumers. This presentation is an exploration of how one institution came to create an innovative tiered educational approach to: get buy in, promote learner centered education and create faculty simulation champions. This pioneering approach provided education and resources for the organization’s educators in academia and staff development to utilize simulation effectively in a learner-centered facilitated approach. As expected, these outcomes led to increased buy in by organizational stakeholders and educators. During the presentation the challenges, development, and implementation of this faculty development project will be discussed. e397 Presentation Abstracts from 2012 INACSL Conference pp e385-e416 Clinical Simulation in Nursing Volume 8 Issue 8

Upload: jessica-l

Post on 25-Nov-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Creating Champions: A Tiered Approach for Faculty Development & Buy-In

e397 Presentation Abstracts from 2012 INACSL Conference

role playing for an end-of-the term competency simulation. Other clinical

courses in the pre-licensure program now including volunteer clients to

enhance simulations include the adult health and psychiatric nursing

courses.

This presentation will focus on the simulation lab coordination and

management required for the successful operation of the volunteer client

program. Tips and strategies will be shared for the development, organiza-

tion, and day-to-day operations of the volunteer client program which

requires over 600 volunteer hours each semester. Share ideas and learn how

one program is addressing such issues as staffing, policy and database

development, volunteer recruiting and marketing, scheduling, volunteer

parking, collaborationwith faculty and simulation lab personnel, budget, and

evaluation of the experiences.

Outcomes from the Volunteer Client Program have been positive. Both

student nurses and volunteer ‘‘patients’’ report very high satisfaction

with the experience. Out of the over 400 students surveyed since 2008,

87% reported they are ‘‘better prepared to take an actual health history in

the clinical setting.’’ Additionally, over 97% of the student nurses

recommended the continued use of volunteer patients in their education.

Volunteers are also very enthusiastic about their involvement and

rewarding opportunity to help future nurses and improve health care in

our community. Adjectives used to describe the nursing students include:

great job, very thorough, organized, energetic, good listener, very

professional, thoughtful, and considerate, kind, and caring. One volun-

teer commented that her ‘‘confidence in nurses continues to be sky-

high.’’

‘‘Other duties as assigned: The true meaning when runninga simulation center’’

Level of Presentation: Novice

Tiffany L. Holmes, D.C., Coordinator of Simulation Laboratories, St.

David’s School of Nursing at Texas State University, 512-716-2950,

[email protected]

Beth Hallmark, PhD, RN, Belmont University Gordon E. Inman

College of Health Sciences and Nursing, St. David’s School of Nursing,

Texas State University, 1555 University Blvd., Round Rock, TX 78665

Learning Objectives

1. Define the vague phrase ‘‘Other Duties as Assigned’’ in relation to

working within a simulation center by detailing the day to day respon-

sibilities and provide solutions to reduce the occurrence and tedious-

ness of these tasks.

2. Discuss the ideal candidate for staffing a simulation center.

Employees working in simulation are often heard saying ‘‘I never knew

I would be doing this for this job.’’ Those unexpected tasks/duties are

encompassed in one small phrase used on most job descriptions: ‘‘Other

duties as assigned.’’ Although this ambiguous phrase will never truly be

defined, creating accurate expectations are vital components to finding

excellent employees that match the responsibilities of the position. This

presentation will describe those other duties and explore ways to decrease

unnecessary tasks. Presenters will provide experiences to prepare a new

employee or employer for what is to come when working in a simulation

center. Discussions will include the correlation of jobs found within the

working world and their existence in the daily operations of a simulation

environment. Solutions will be given to reduce the occurrence and

tediousness of these jobs. Samples of the jobs to be discussed in the

presentation are a Sanitation Specialist, an Accountant and

a Housekeeper.

Participants will gain pearls of wisdom from presenters that are

currently managing simulation centers with little to no staff but have

managed staffs as large as 7 or more. Their experiences in working in the

trenches of a simulation lab will provide an invaluable resource to all

pp e385-

levels of simulation employees and employers to lasso the best simulation

ideas that can be implemented immediately upon returning from the

conference.

Creating Champions: A Tiered Approach for Faculty Development &Buy-In

Level of Presentation: Advanced

Jessica L. Kamerer, MSN, RNC-NIC, Facilitator Simulation Learning

at Lancaster General College of Nursing & Health Sciences, 410 North

Lime Street Lancaster, PA 17602, (717) 544-5478,

[email protected]

Objectives

1. Participants will be able to identify one challenge associated with im-

plementing a simulation education faculty development project and

one strategy to address it.

2. Participants will identify one component of implementing a simulation

education faculty development project.

Simulation has emerged as popular teaching modality in nursing and

medical schools across the country. A survey of 1,060 nursing programs in

the United States revealed that 87% were using simulation and 55% were

using it in five or more courses (Hayden, 2010). More interactive than

traditional lecture methods (Jeffries, 2005), simulation is an effective

learning tool when it is situated in an active, immersive learning

environment and sessions are followed by a guided debriefing session.

With these growing expectations; for many prospective learners, the

presence of simulation could be the deciding factor when choosing

a nursing or health careers program (Turcato, Roberson, & Covert, 2008).

Despite the expected use of simulation in nursing and medical education

programs across the nation, faculty are often under prepared or intimidated

by the technology to properly implement this pedagogy and create

effective learning experiences for students. Faculty members have cited

numerous perceived barriers to implementation of simulation into

curriculum. Jansen, Johnson, Larson, Berry & Benner identified barriers

such as: time, training to operate and manage simulations, application to

practice, engaging learners, and lack of staffing in their study that

surveyed nursing faculty across 5 universities on what kept them from

implementing simulation into their courses (2009). Overall, the most

common barrier identified is the need for training to facilitate simulation

(Hayden, 2010).

Despite the increased demand and implementation of simulation,

a lack of training programs and standardization of education for faculty

on using these teaching methods inhibits its use. With high cost

equipment, shifts from traditional teaching paradigms, and technology

overload apprehension on how, when, and why to use simulation in their

teaching practices is understandable. The tiered education approach was

created to address these concerns to properly train educators on the best

practices identified in literature for facilitating and implementing

simulation based education. By training educators, the aim was to also

increase buy-in within the organization by making them more comfort-

able, thus leading to increased usage, implementation, and adoption by

new consumers. This presentation is an exploration of how one institution

came to create an innovative tiered educational approach to: get buy in,

promote learner centered education and create faculty simulation

champions. This pioneering approach provided education and resources

for the organization’s educators in academia and staff development to

utilize simulation effectively in a learner-centered facilitated approach.

As expected, these outcomes led to increased buy in by organizational

stakeholders and educators. During the presentation the challenges,

development, and implementation of this faculty development project

will be discussed.

e416 � Clinical Simulation in Nursing � Volume 8 � Issue 8

Page 2: Creating Champions: A Tiered Approach for Faculty Development & Buy-In

Presentation Abstracts from 2012 INACSL Conference e398

A challenge of managing simulation centers is achieving buy in from

stake holders in the necessity of allocating resources to build and

maintain a successful center. The end product of success is creating

extraordinary learning experiences for users. By focusing on the

component of properly educating faculty and staff on the best practices

of facilitating simulation, it serves both the stakeholders’ need for

justification of resources while proving the productiveness of its methods

by providing quality educational experiences to learners. As the use of

simulation grows in programs across the nation, the need for proper

training methods on using it will grow as well. Thus this will create

a demand for standardization of education programs in the future of

simulation.

Blazing a Trail to Build a Simulation Program

Level of Presentation: Audience: Novice

Tom LeMaster, RN, MSN, Med, REMT-P, Program Director, Center for

Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Office

513.636.8048, 513.379.5670, [email protected]

Jenn Manos, RN, BSN, Institution: Center for Simulation and

Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH

Objectives: Identify three operational components required to develop

a simulation program.

Describe the development of a business plan when creating a simulation

center.

The purpose of this presentation is to share the experience and lessons

learned in the development of a simulation lab. The Center for Simulation

and Research was developed like many, out of a small closet and one human

patient simulator. Since 2001, the center has expanded twice and added 11

human patient simulators. Our journey moving from a fee for service to

a hospital and outreach supported program offers many lessons learned for

those new to simulation or starting a simulation program. In addition to being

lab based, in-situ simulations are important to sustain the education programs

in the lab.

At the completion of the program, participants will be able to develop

a plan and outline the needed support and resources to implement

a simulation program. Critical to the process will be the development of

a mission and focus of the center. The program will also review the required

components of a simulation center budget with examples.

As many are seeking to implement simulation in to education

programs, there are many lessons learned from those who have traveled

before them. Sharing the process of the development of a budget,

identifying the needed resources and how to position the simulation

program with in the institution can assist new and developing program to

reach success faster.

The Business of Simulation e Roping It Together With StrategicPlanning

Level of Presentation: Novice

Megan McClintock, MS, RN, Adjunct Faculty, Denver School of

Nursing, 405-229-8984, Denver School of Nursing, 1401 19th Street,

Denver, CO 80202, [email protected]

Cheryl Feken, MS, RN, Assistant Professor of Nursing, Clinical

Simulation Lab Coordinator, Tulsa Community College, 10300 E 81st

Street, Tulsa, OK 74133, 918-595-8696, [email protected]

Objectives

1. Describe 2 benefits of utilizing a strategic plan in the simulation

environment.

pp e385-

2. Begin to develop a three-year plan for your simulation lab utilizing

resources and terms to better define and identify goals, funding, and

marketing ideas.

The Simulation Lab has come to be identified as an environment for

students to integrate theory with practice and a place to deliver patient care

in a no-risk environment. However, this technology is not without cost. The

simulation environment can require significant amounts of creativity in

managing financial resources to maintain and grow. Many nursing faculty

have been placed in coordinator or managing roles in the simulation lab

with minimal knowledge of how to plan or financially operate a simulation

lab.

Identifying and implementing a strategic plan is an effective way to plan

and utilize financial resources. Being prepared with the necessary data,

knowing the vision of the lab, and knowing what resources will be needed

provides the simulation coordinator/manager the ability to better use

financial resources when they become available.

This session will move you from learning about simulation to doing

simulation strategically with a plan to guide you along the way. Failure

to plan strategically is often the biggest obstacle to simulation programs.

We will take what you have learned at this session and identify what is

practical for you to implement NOW. Don’t leave here with notes...leave

with a plan!

Making Maximum Use of Resources through Organizational Efficiency

Level of Presentation: Novice

Cristina Richards, BSHA, Instructional Services Specialist, University

of Iowa College of Nursing, Nursing Clinical Education Center, 200

Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 319-356-3902, cristina-

[email protected]

Ellen Cram, PhD, RN, Assistant Dean, Undergraduate and Pre-

licensure Programs, Clinical Associate Professor, University of Iowa

College of Nursing, Nursing Clinical Education Center, 200 Hawkins

Drive, Iowa City, IA

Objectives: At the completion of this session, the participant will be able to:

1. Identify organizing strategies.

2. Explain cost savings opportunities through systemization.

In most labs/simulation centers, supply storage is a major concern. No

matter how much planning goes into the design of a facility, people who

work in simulation centers generally agree additional storage is desirable.

Efficient use of all available space is a high priority. A diverse array of

supplies is required for the varied levels of learners who use the center and

for the wide scope of conditions with which students and clinicians work.

With multiple users in a center, it becomes even more challenging to keep

storage space uniformly organized. For instance, if a user experiences

difficulty finding an item, the easy answer is to repurchase that supply.

Sometimes in this situation the user resorts to hoarding supplies in hidden

location which then restricts use by others and minimizes financial

efficiency through inflated supply levels. This creates frustration, increased

cost, potential for increased long-term loss, and possible delay in a planned

learning activity.

Standardized locations, par levels and ease of identification of supplies

can be difficult to achieve because of the complexity of use of

a simulation center. Automated shelving, computerized inventory control,

and multipurpose storage containers are useful, but may be higher cost

solutions than are supportable. The answer to disarray may not need to be

high cost or highly technical. For example, each space must be given

a clear purpose that all users can easily identify and understand without

need for excessive explanation. The strategy used in our center for

creating order out of chaos will be shared. Improvement strategies

discussed will suggest ways to preserve time, dollars, and energy, leaving

more focus on learners.

e416 � Clinical Simulation in Nursing � Volume 8 � Issue 8