cphi in focus - aiswariya chidambaram (frost & sullivan): biopharmaceutical contract...
TRANSCRIPT
Global Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market – Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
Aiswariya Chidambaram Senior Research Analyst - Life Sciences
24-10-2013
2
Focus Points
Focus Points
The Rise of Biopharmaceuticals
Comparative Analysis: Generics, Biosimilars and Biologics
Global Biopharmaceutical Market Overview
Biopharmaceutical Contract Outsourcing – Benefit Analysis
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market Overview
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Segment Life Cycle Analysis
Key Market Drivers and Restraints
Technology – The Powerful Tool
Key Competitive Factors in the Selection of a CMO
Anticipating Capacity Demand – A Tricky Speculation
What can be Expected in the Future?
Facing the Change – Strategic Recommendations
3
The Rise of Biopharmaceuticals
“Biopharmaceuticals – The Length and Breadth of Healthcare in Future”
What are biopharmaceuticals? – Biopharmaceuticals are pharmaceutical drugs based on protein, therapeutic serum, virus, vaccine, blood components or derivatives or gene transfer products, directly administered into the blood stream by injection. They are complex macromolecules with
very high molecular weights compared to small molecules.
Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing – Biopharmaceuticals are generally expressed in mammalian cells (mice, rabbits, etc.) or micro-organisms (yeast, bacteria, etc.). Manufacturing involves highly sterile, aseptic conditions and highly sensitive to changes in environment. Formulations are
predominantly injectables – pre-filled syringes or cartridges.
Why Biopharmaceuticals?
Stronger focus on target diseases, more effective and potent action, potential to cure diseases rather than just treating symptoms, lesser side effects.
Technology Monoclonal Antibodies
Recombinant Proteins
Protein Therapeutics
Oligonucleotides
Gene Therapy
Applications Research
Therapeutics
Diagnostics
4
Comparative Analysis: Generics, Biosimilars and Biologics
Moderate (5075%)Low (~30%)
BiosimilarsGenerics Biologics
Mar
keti
ng
Oth
er
Dyn
amic
s
Probability of successProbability of success
TimeTime
CostCost
PricingPricing
Marketing investmentMarketing investment
Point of differentiationPoint of differentiation
Barriers to entryBarriers to entry
Product operational profit margins
Product operational profit margins
Decision makersDecision makers
CompetitorsCompetitors
Short (34 Yrs) Long (812)
Low (~$5 million)High
($350900 million)
Commodity pricing Premium (full pricing)
Low High
Group purchasing / Medical professional
OrganisationsPrescribers, patients
High, Less differentiated
Few, well differentiated
Price, breadth of portfolio
Product profile, marketing
Low (Cost efficiency)
High (development process)
Low (~20%) High (~40%)
High (~90%)
Moderate (78 Yrs)
$100200 million
Lower pricing value
Payers, prescribers
Moderate
Few, Partially differentiated
Price, Product profile & technology
High (capital and development)
Mixed (2530%)
Pro
du
ct
Dev
elo
pm
ent
5
Global Biopharmaceutical Market Overview
Recombinant Proteins
Monoclonal Antibodies
Vaccines Insulin
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and recombinant proteins are the two largest segments, growing at rates of 11.8 and 8.2 per cent in 2011.
U.S. and Europe are the major markets for biopharmaceuticals; Asian markets are likely to present significant growth.
The future of Biopharmaceutical industry is promising, with biotech companies focusing more on innovation and technological advancements and increasing interest of pharmaceutical companies to enter into the biotech business.
Biopharmaceutical Market: Per cent Revenue Contribution by Therapeutic Segment (Global)
The European Biopharmaceutical Industry grew by 11 per cent from 2009 to 2010.
45%
40%
10%5%
U.S.Rest of World
Europe
Asia
Biopharmaceutical Market: Per cent Revenue Contribution by Region (Global)
48.9%
34.3%
10.3%6.5%
6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Small Molecules mAbs Therapeutic Proteins Vaccines
Year
Pre
sc
rip
tio
n D
rug
Sa
les
Pharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Percent of Combined Prescription Sales for Big Pharmaceutical Companies by Molecule Type, Global, 2012–2017
Increasing Adoption of the “Large Molecules” Model by Big Pharma
Key Takeaway: As large molecules are commercially attractive and less competitive, big pharma companies will likely increase their focus on these segments in the future.
Note: Sales from generic drugs have been excluded.
7
Benefit Analysis
Cost-efficiency
Rationalization of assets
Focus on core competencies
Life-cycle management
Operational efficiency
Regulatory Expertise
Biopharmaceutical Contract Outsourcing – Benefit Analysis
8
65%
35%
Mammalian-based manufacturing Microbial-based manufacturing
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Per cent Revenue Contribution by Segments (Global)
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market - Segment Analysis
Mammalian-based manufacturing currently represents the largest segment, accounting for two-thirds of the Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market and is likely to be the major growth
driver over the next five years.
Segment
Revenue
(%)
Revenue
Growth Rate
(%)
Mammalian-based
manufacturing
65 5-6
Microbial-based
manufacturing
35 2-3
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Per cent Revenue Contribution by Segments
(Global)
9
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market - Segment Life Cycle Analysis
Time
MaturityDevelopment Growth Decline
Mar
ket
Val
ue
Microbial Contract Manufacturing Market is mature and stable, and experiencing minimal growth rates. It is a very old technology and
not suitable for complex, glycosylated molecules. Hence, most CMOs do not plan for
capacity expansions in this segment.
Microbial
Mammalian
Key:
The current period being the decade of monoclonal antibodies, significant growth is expected in this segment. The cutting-edge
technologies and remarkable success of mAbs in oncology presents a promising future for this segment. Capacity additions are expected to increase by 66 per cent in the next five years globally. The profit margins are also relatively
higher in this segment.
10
Drivers
Cost and time
saving benefits
CMOs have made huge
investments in infrastructure,
technology and personnel
Patent Cliff
Biologics worth $110
billion to lose patent protection between 2010 and
2020
Strong Biologics Pipeline
New product launches and
novel drug delivery
mechanisms to drive
outsourcing
Integrated/ Risk-sharing
Business Model
End-to-end service
providers offering value-added
services
Increasingly stringent
regulations
Increased over head costs and reduces time-to-market
Lack of VC Funding for early-stage companies
Greater preference for
companies with promising
late-stage candidates
Restraints
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market – Key Drivers and Restraints
11
Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Costs Breakdown
30%
20%
40%
10%
Process Development Upstream Processing
Downstream Processing Others
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Manufacturing Cost Breakdown by Process (Global)
34.5%
16%28.5%
21%
Capital Labour Materials, Utilities & Wastes Overhead
Key Takeaway: The cost to build, equip, and validate a bio manufacturing facility ranges between $350 and $900 million, depending upon the product manufactured
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Manufacturing Cost Breakdown by Component (Global)
12
2012 2014 2016 20182010 2020
Patent Expirations
BeneFIX (Pfizer)
2011
Total Biologics Market: Patent Expirations, (Global), 2010–2020
Source: Frost & SullivanYear
Pro
du
ct
Enbrel (Amgen/ Pfizer)2012
Neupogen (Pfizer)2013
Humalog (Eli Lilly)2013
Avonex (Biogen Idec)2013
Cerezyme (Genzyme)
2013
Rebif (Merck KGaA)2013
Epogen (Amgen)2013
Procrit/ Eprex (J&J)2013
Prevnar (Pfizer)2015
Lantus (Sanofi-aventis)
2015
Actemra (Roche)2015
Gonal-F (Merck KGaA)2015
Neulasta (Amgen)2015
Nimotuzumab (YM Biosciences)
2015
Norditropin SimpleXx (Novo
Nordisk)2015
Tysabri (Elan/ Biogen Idec)
2017
Provenge (Dendreon)
2017
Victoza (Novo Nordisk)
2017
Cervarix (GSK)2017
Avastin (Roche)2018
Apidra (Sanofi-aventis)
2018
Gardasil (Merck & Co)2019
Rota Teq (Merck & Co)2019
Erbitux (Merck KGaA/ Bristol Myers Squibb)
2019
Levemir (Novo Nordisk)
2019
Elaprase (Shire)2019
Orencia (Bristol Myers Squibb)
2019
Herceptin (Roche)2019
13
2012 2014 2016 20182010 2020
Patent Expirations (continued)
Total Biologics Market: Patent Expirations, (Global), 2010–2020
Source: Frost & SullivanYear
Pro
du
ct
NovoMix (Novo Nordik)
2014
NovoRapid (Novo Nordisk)
2014
Rituxan (Roche)2014
Kogenate (Bayer)2014
Helixate (CSL Biotherapies)
2015
Humira (Abbott Laboratories)
2016
Zostavax (Merck & Co)2016
Forteo/ Forsteo (Eli Lilly)
2018
Remicade (J&J/ Merck & Co)
2018
Xolair (Roche/ Novartis)
2018
Pegasys (Roche)2019
PEGIntron (Merck & Co)2019
Vectibix (Amgen)2020
Lucentis (Roche/ Novartis)
2020
Botox (Allergan)2020
Synflorix (GSK)2020
Replagal (Shire)2020
14
Biopharmaceutical R&D in Europe – What’s in the Pipeline?
0
50
100
150
200
250
Spain Italy France Germany UnitedKingdom
Number of drug candidates
Phase I Phase II Phase III
The biopharmaceutical R&D expenditure in Europe, grew by 5 per cent from 2010 to 2011.
As venture capital firms in Europe are interested to invest only in late stage biopharmaceutical companies, start-up biotech companies gain access to funding, predominantly through venture capital firms based at the U.S.
More than 50.0 per cent of the products in the European pipeline account for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
More than 1,200 biopharmaceuticals in the pipeline.
More than 50% drugs represented by the five major countries.
UK (over 230) and Germany (150 approximately) have the maximum number of drug candidates in the pipeline.
Spain has shown a significant increase of 30% in 2010 from its 2009 pipeline.
Biopharmaceutical Market: Number of Drugs in Various Stages of Clinical Pipeline, by Country (Europe)
15
Venture Capitalist (VC) Funding Analysis
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
$5,000
First Time VC Follow-on VC
Year
VC
In
ve
stm
en
t (m
illi
on
)
Overall greater interest from VC firms in the biopharmaceutical sector than small molecules.
Greater capital allocation to the U.S. than Europe.
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: VC Investment in Biopharmaceutical Companies and CMOs, (Global), 2000 - 2011
16
Technology – “The Powerful Tool”
• Customizable design• Enhanced Productivity• Significant operational benefits
• Optimized expression systems• Enhanced cell productivity & viability• Simplified purification process• Improved selectivity
• Minimizing human errors• Maximizing productivity• Improvised product quality
Single Use Technologies are specially designed for
• Muti-product contract manufacturing.
• Easy transfer of operations
• Busy facilities and lean operations.
Upstream technologies
• cell productivity - 2-4 g/L in established production processes
• 4-6 g/L in pre-clinical and clinical manufacturing processes,.
Downstream technologies
• mAbs – filtration & purification resins
• Recombinant proteins - higher selectivity and flow-through mode purification steps.
• Lyophilisation - protein based drugs, preservation and packaging.
• Process Analytical Technologies (PAT) - product driven approach to process based one.
• Standardization of processes.
• Reduced degree of variation.
Upstream & Downstream Lyophilisation & PATDisposables/ SUBs
Innovation
Funding
Expertise
Regulatory compliance
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” – Arthur C. Clarke
17
Competitive Landscape
Tier 1
• Lonza Group Ltd• Boehringer Ingelheim
Tier 2
• Sandoz• Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnology• Royal DSM• Rentschler Biotechnologie
Tier 3
• Celonic GmbH• BIOMEVA GmbH• ProBioGen AG• Others
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Key CMOs by Tiers of Competition
18
Capacity
Reputation/Credibility
Technical expertise
QualityLow
Low High
Low High
2 105 6 8
2 104 6 8
2 104 6 8
Low High
2 104 6 8
High
Personal relationship
Communication
Timely delivery/ Speed
Approved facilities/Regulatory support
Low
Low High
Low High
2 104 6 8
2 104 6 8
2 104 6 8
Low High
2 104 6 8
High
Cost LocationLow High
2 104 6 8Low High
2 104 6 8
Note: Above are the key competitive factors in the selection of a CMO by Pharmaceutical/Biotech companies for contract manufacturing services. The factors are rated on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 = Low importance and 10 = High importance based on the end-user’s input.
Key Competitive Factors in the selection of a CMO
19
Anticipating Capacity Demand – A Tricky Speculation
2011
2015
2018
2020
Demand < Supply
Demand < Supply
Demand = Supply
Demand >Supply
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Capacity Supply-Demand Gap Analysis (Global)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201815
15.5
16
16.5
17
17.5
15.9%
16.1%16.2%
16.5%
16.8%
17.0%
17.4%17.5%
Year
Demand for Outsourcing (%)
Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market: Demand Rate for Outsourcing to CMOs (Global)
“It is highly essential that CMOs make cautious decisions regarding capacity expansions and choice of contract deals, lest they be hit by over capacity and witness a subsequent erosion of profit margins”.
The global biopharmaceutical industry has been alternating between cycles of excess and inadequate manufacturing capacity (including captive and contract).
Current scenario conforms to slightly surplus capacity supply than the actual demand. Captive manufacturers are increasingly shutting down plants or selling excess capacities.
20
What Can Be Expected in the Future?
TechnologyDevelopment of Transgenic technologies
Stem cell technologiesCloning technologies
TherapeuticsDevelopment of RNA-i based therapeutics
Development of anti-sense based therapeutics Recombinant protein therapeutics
Monoclonal antibodies
GovernmentRegulatory bodies like EMEA to drive new
product and technology introduction
Increase in approval rates of new biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars.
GlobalizationConsolidations, mergers, acquisitions
Opening and expansion of Asian marketsGlobal capital markets
Transition from “small molecule blockbuster” model to “biopharmaceutical” model.
Increase in public awareness, acceptance and approval of biopharmaceuticals.
Increase in outsourcing of biopharmaceutical manufacturing by Big Pharma companies.
Development of “Virtual Pharma”
Differentiation and consolidation strategies adopted by Biotech companies and CMOs.
“A-one-stop-shop” offered by CMOs, promoting a complete portfolio of products and comprehensive range of services.
Large CMOs moving into niche areas of biopharmaceutical manufacturing.
Further development and implementation of transgenic technologies.
Establishment of regulatory pathways for biosimilars and transgenics.
“ The best way to predict the future is to create it” – Peter Drucker
21
Facing the Change – Strategic Recommendations
Reacting to Change
Anticipating Change
Leading the
Change
• Develop biopharmaceuticals for key indications.
• Customize according to customer needs and preferences.
• Comply with new government policies.
• Analyze prospects for market globalization.
• Research customer needs, preferences and expectations.
• Monitor new technological developments to predict future. • Foresee capacity requirements.
• Pioneer new and better technologies.
• Introduce innovative products, that open new market opportunities and spur creation of whole new industries.
• Seek to set industry standards.
• React and respond as needed.
• Defend and protect company’s position in the market.
• Plan ahead for future changes.
• Invest in R&D.
• Instill competitive capabilities.
• Improve product line.
• Strengthen distribution.
• Seize the offensive.
• Be the agent of industry change.
• Influence rules of the game.
• Force rivals to follow.
Strategic Posture
Actions Strategy
“ Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.” – John F. Kennedy
22
Related Market Research Reports
Global Pharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing Market
Global Next Generation Biosimilars Market
Global Contract Research Outsourcing Market
24
Legal Disclaimer
Frost & Sullivan takes no responsibility for the incorrect information supplied to us by manufacturers or users. Quantitative market information is based primarily on interviews and therefore is subject to fluctuation. Frost & Sullivan research services are limited publications containing valuable market information provided to a select group of customers. Our customers acknowledge, when ordering or downloading, that Frost & Sullivan Research Services are for customers’ internal use and not for general publication or disclosure to third parties. No part of this Research Service may be given, lent, resold or disclosed to noncustomers without written permission. Furthermore, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of the publisher.• For information regarding permission, write to:
Frost & Sullivan
331 E. Evelyn Ave. Suite 100
Mountain View, CA 94041
25
Tel: +91 (0) 44 61606666 (Extn: 4097)Fax: +91 (0) 44 4230 0369Email: [email protected]
State your need, we would be happy to serve you…
www.frost.com
Frost & Sullivan (I) Pvt. Ltd.ASV HANSANo.53, Greams RoadThousand LightsChennai 600 006
AISWARIYA CHIDAMBARAMSenior Research Analyst – Life Sciences
Your Growth Partner
Contact Information