covalent bonding of drug to enzyme
DESCRIPTION
enzyme-ligand non-covalent interactions: competitive inhibition, free energy of binding, covalent binding of drug to enzyme, drug-protein binding forcesTRANSCRIPT
The Pharmacophore
The functional groups (ionization considered) of a drug and the bioactive conformation they must
adopt to sustain high-affinity and specific non-covalent interactions with the molecular target.
Drug-MT binding forces are the same that stabilize protein tertiary structure:
• Hydrogen bonds
• Hydrophobic interactions
• Electrostatic interactions
• Ion-dipole interactions
• Dipole-dipole interactions
• Charge-transfer complexes
• -cation
Solvation and intramolecular binding forces:
• Energy penalty of desolvation of drug and protein MT
• Hydrophobic collapse
• Intramolecular hydrogen bonds
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Aldrich catalog:
(R)-(-)-Norepinephrine; -(aminomethyl)-3,4-dihydroxybenzyl alcohol; (HO)2C6H3CH(CH2NH2)OHWentland-SC-9
HO
O
O
NH3
H
H
• •
Bioactive conformation
H
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 1
Wentland-SC-9k
N
N
N
HN
HN
O
N
NCH3
H3C
X-Ray Structure of Abl-Tk/STI-571 (1IEP)
Bioactive conformation of STI-571from X-ray coordinates (1IEP)
Via Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/)
STI-571(a.k.a. imatinib or Gleevec®)
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 2
Wentland-SC-9m
Protein Structure
Primary (1o) structure:[Amino acid sequence]
NH
HN
NH
HN
NH
HN
NH
O P1'
O P2'
O
O
O
O
O P3'
P4'P1P3
P2
HN
O
P4
Secondary (2o) structure:[Conformation of segments ofbackbone (e.g., -helix, -sheet)]
Tertiary (3o) structure:[3D arrangement of all atomsIn a protein (e.g., Abl-TK)]
Quaternary (4o) structure:[3D structure of proteins havingmore than one peptide chain(e.g., homodimeric HIV protease)]
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 3
NH
HN
NH
OH
O
O
O CH3
H
HO
H3N
O
R H
O-
Wentland-SC-9v
Nearly all Natural Amino Acids have a Center of Chirality
+
20 Natural AAs have (S)- or L- absolute
configuration except Cys (R-) and Gly
L- L-glyceraldehyde (Fischer notation of
absolute configuration)
(R)- or (S)- Cahn-Ingold-Prelog notation
of absolute configuration)
The tripeptide, H-Ser-Ala-Phe-OH,
drawn in the standard "zig-zag"/
N- to C-terminus representation.
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 4
CH2-S-S-CH2
CH2
H3C
CH
H3C
CH2
O
O
NH
H2N
H2N
•••
•••
•••
•••
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •CO
2H
H2N
C O
H
N
Disulfide
Hydrophobic
-Pleated sheet
H-bond
Electrostatic
-Helix
Wentland-SC-10
Interactions that Stabilize the Secondary Structure of Proteins
• • •
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 5
Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
1974, 359, 298.
1.33
1.45Å
O
C
H
1.0Å
C
1.23Å
1.52ÅC
121.1o
N
121.9o
123.2o
115.6o
118.2o119.5o
H3N
O
R H
O-
N
O
H
NN
N
O
O
O
R
H
R''H
R'
HH
HH
N
H HCO2
-
N+
O
H
+ 20 Natural AAs have (S)- or L- absolute configuration except Cys (R)- and Gly
Primary peptide structure (transoid form)
..
Restricted rotation due to amide resonance
Amino Acid/Peptide Primer
Amino Acid
Glycine
Alanine
Valine
Leucine
Isoleucine
Serine
Threonine
Cysteine
Methionine
Phenylalanine
Tyrosine
Tryptophan
Histidine
Arginine
Lysine
Aspartic Acid
Glutamic Acid
Asparagine
Glutamine
Proline
Wentland-SC-10a
R =
H
CH3
CH(CH3)2
CH2CH(CH3)2
(S)-CH(CH3)CH2CH3
CH2OH
(R)-CH(OH)CH3
CH2SH
CH2CH2SCH3
CH2C6H5
CH2-4-C6H4OH
CH2-3-indolyl
CH2-4-imidazolyl
(CH2)3NHC(=NH)NH2
(CH2)4NH2
CH2CO2H
CH2CH2CO2H
CH2CONH2
CH2CH2CONH2
3 Letter Name
Gly
Ala
Val
Leu
Ile
Ser
Thr
Cys
Met
Phe
Tyr
Trp
His
Arg
Lys
Asp
Glu
Asn
Gln
Pro
1 Letter Name
G
A
V
L
I
S
T
C
M
F
Y
W
H
R
K
D
E
N
Q
P+
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 6
N
O
H
R
Wentland-SC-12c
N
O
H
N
H
R
N
O
H
N
O
H
R
R
O
R
R
O-
Glu
O
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 7
N
O
O
H
R
N
N
O
O H
H
N
N
O
O H
N
H
RH
R R R
N
O
O
HR
N
N
O
OH
HR
NN
O
H
HR
RR
N
HRO
N
O
O
H
R
N
N
O
O H
H
R
N
N
O
O H
N
H
RH
R R R
Wentland-SC-13c
CH3O
HThr
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 8
Wentland-SC-13d
Abl-Tk/STI-571 Non-covalent Interactions from 1IEP
N
N
N
N N
O
N
NCH3
H3C
H H
O O
CH2CH2
OCH HCH3
thr315
glu286
glu286
thr315
IC50 = 38 nM
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 9
Wentland-SC-13f
Enzyme-Ligand Non-Covalent Interactions: Competitive Inhibition
E · I E + INCC
koff
kon
Ki =
[E · I][E] [I] k
off=
kon
"Slow tight-binding" inhibitors are characterized by:
- Slow (relative to diffusion control) "on rate"
- Very slow "off rate"
- Displacement of a structured H2O from active site
- Transition state analogue
NCC (non-covalent complexes)
E · S [E · S]‡ E · PE + S H2OH
2O P + E
X-H SubstrateX-H
SubstrateInhibitor
X-H Inhibitor
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 10
Lineweaver-Burk Plots for Determination of Kiof a Competitive Inhibitor
Wentland-SC-14a
1
Km
1
Kmapp
1
Km (1 + [I]/Ki)
{
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
[I] = 0 M
[I]=
3XM
[I]= 2X
M
[I] =1X
M
1[S]
(mM-1)
1[v]
(min/mM)
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 11
IC50
Value and Dose Response Curves
Wentland-SC-14b
Inhibitor concentration - M
Enzy
me in
hib
ition (
%)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1.0 100.10 0.30 3.0
IC50 = 1.0 M IC50 = 10 M
30 100
Both inhibitors are equally active;
one is 10-fold more potent
IC50 = Ki 1 +[S]Km
When [S] is 10-fold or more below its Km, then IC50 ~ Ki
IC50 = [Inhibitor] that reducesproduct formation by 50%
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 12
Enzyme-Ligand Non-Covalent Interactions: Free Energy of Binding
Wentland-SC-14c
Go = Ho - T So
• Enthalpic (H) effects: H-bonds, (de)solvation, electrostatics, VDW, etc.
• Entropic (S) effects:
- Unbound ligand S (translational and rotational energies)
- Bound ligand S (fewer degrees of freedom)
- Water release (ordered to disordered) S
Attributes of a competitve inhibitor:
- Active-site directed
- High affinity and specific non-covalent interactions with MT
- Does not act as alternate substrate
- "Drug-like"
Go = Go - Goproducts reactants
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 13
Drug-Protein Non-Covalent Interactions: Noncompetitive Inhibition
Inhibitor/drug binds to enzyme at a different site than substrate
Wentland-SC-14d
X-H
substrate
X-H
drug
drug
X-H
X-H substrate X-H
drug
substrate
E · S · I
Point to Ponder - Complex kinetics may
hinder quantification of activity; e.g.,
E · S · I can still be catalytically active
E · S E · I
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 14
Wentland-SC-14f
Drug-Protein Interactions: Covalent Bonding of Drug to Enzyme
E + I* E • I* E I*
NCC
Alkylation:
Br
X
+
X-H drug* drug*irreversible
N
NH
O
OH2N
O
HN
H2NNH2
Cl
S1
S2
S3
PPACK: inhibitor of human thrombinCHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 15
O NH
O NH
N
O
H
N H
X
X
O NH
HO
H
OH
H
NO
CH3
HO
O
NH
N
O
H
OH H
X
X
donor (drug) acceptor (protein)acceptor (drug) donor (protein)
• Hydrogen bond - linear non-covalent bond between a donor H (O-H or N-H) and an acceptor O, N or F.
- Stabilization: Go = H
o - T So ~ - 0.5 to -7 kcal/mol with 2.4-3.0 Å optimal
Drug-Protein Binding Forces
- Desolvation Penalty
Enthalpic and entropic benefit in establishing H-bond contacts with MT may be offset by an uncompensatable desolvation penalty. Then why do this? SELECTIVITY and SOLUBLITY !!
Drug - protein NCCSolvated drug and protein - unbound
Wentland-SC-17
....
....
....
.. ..
+ H2O....
+
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 16
O
O H NH2(CH2)4-Lys
O
O
CH2 Glu
O N
NO
NH(CH2)3-Arg
H
H
H
H
N
CH3
CH3
H
N
CH3
CH3
H N N
H
ON H
O
(CH3)3NCH2
CH2
OCOCH3
H3NN O
CN
CH2-Phe
N
Trp-84
H
CH2 TyrHO
• Charge-transfer complexes ( Go ~ -1 to -7 kcal/mol) • -Cation complexes ( G
o ~ -0.5 to -1.5 kcal/mol)
Drug +-
Drug +
-
··
-cation interaction between ACh and acetylcholine esterase
• Ion-dipole interactions ( Go ~ -3 to -5 kcal/mol)
Drug-Protein Binding Forces
Wentland-SC-17d
• Dipole-dipole interactions ( Go ~ -1 to -3 kcal/mol)
Drug
• Electrostatic interactions ( Go ~ -5 to -10 kcal/mol)
DrugDrug
Drug Drug
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 17
C
H H
C
HH
• Enthalpic considerations - Van der Waals contacts
Wentland-SC-17g
Drug-Protein Binding Forces
• Hydrophobic interactions ( Go ~ - 0.5 to -1 kcal/mol)
• Entropic considerations
H2C
HC
H2C
O
OO
OO
O
+
+
-
-
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 18
O
NH
X
O
NH
X
+
Hydrophobic Interactions - Entropic Considerations
Wentland-SC-18
Ordered water molecules surrounding hydrophobic surfaces
water release = S
• The larger the surface area the greater the effect (~ 28 cal/mole/Å2)
• H2O solvation of unbound ligand may have an uncompensatable enthalpic advantage
Water release also stabilizes:
Edge-to-face
N HNH
CH2
TrpDrug
Stacking
CH2
PheDrug
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 19
O
O
OOH
OOHO
AcO
OH
O
O
PhCONH
H3C
O
• Change in conformation of a molecule bought about by dissolution in water relative to that
conformation observed in an organic environment.
• Energy in the form of decreased binding affinity may be required to adopt the bioactive
conformation when that drug exists in a different, but stable conformation in water due to
intramolecular hydrophobic interactions, or conversely;
• If the hydrophobically-collapsed conformation is very similar to the bioactive conformation,
then the molecule is "preorganized" for binding resulting in ehanced binding affinity, e.g., Taxol:
Wentland-SC-18a
Hydrophobic Collapse
NOE's observed between the 4-acetyl methyl,
2-benzoyloxy phenyl and 3'-phenyl groups in
DMSO-water solution.
Vander Velde, D.G.; Georg, G.I.; Grunewald,
G.L.; Gunn, C.W.; Mitscher, L.A. J. Amer.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11650-11651.
10
13
24
3'
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 20
Enzyme-Ligand Binding: A Closer Look
Wentland-SC-18c
Induced fit (Koshland, 1958):
Lock and key (Fisher, 1894):
Teague, S. J. "Implications of Protein Flexibility for Drug Discovery." Nature Rev. - Drug Disc. 2003, 2, 527-541.
+ L1
L1
L2
L2
+
L2
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 21
Factors Contributing to High Affinity Binding
From: Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J. “Hydrogen Bonding, Hydrophobic Interactions, and Failure of the Rigid Receptor Hypothesis” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 736-749.
High affinity binding is generally achieved via induced fit of MT around a ligand having optimized:
• Specific hydrophobic interactions
• Polar interactions
- Contribution of an HB is unpredictable
- Neutral-neutral HB contributes 0- to 15-fold in binding affinity
- Charge reinforced HB contributes up to 3000-fold in binding affinity
How do you achieve high affinity binding? “Stay tuned”
Wentland-SC-18e
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 22
S
HN
NH
O
H
H
OH
OBSA
S
N
N
H
H
O
H
H
Ser(-27)CH2 O
H
OTyr-43 H
H
HN
OAsn(-23)O O
Asp-128
OH
Ser(-45)CH2
O
O
H
N
HO
CH2Ser-88
O
O
Asn-49
S
N
N
O
H
H
O
OH
H
S
N
N
O
H
H
O
O
H
H
S
N
N
O
H
H
O
OH
H
Kd =[ SA ] [ B ]
[ SA • B ]= 4 x 10-14 M
Biotin
Biotin-Streptavidin Non-Covalent Interactions
Weber, P.C.; Ohlendorf, D.H.; Wendoloski, J.J.; Salemme, F.R. Science 1989, 243, 85. Wentland-SC-20a
SA • Bkoff
kon
+
Go = H
o- T So = - 2.303RT logKeq = - 18.3 kcal/mol
Every 10-fold increase in potency (K) - 1.36 kcal/mol
MW = 244.2
Binding stabilizes dipolar resonance contributors
Hydrophobic pocket formedby Trp-79, -92, -108
Binding interactions from 1STP.pdb:
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 23 Wentland-SC-20d
• Biotinylated peptide substrate "immobilized" to streptavidin-coated 96-well ELISA microtiter plate(ELISA = Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbant Assay)
• Add test compounds in varying concentrations and positive/negative controls
• Add a Tyrosine Kinase and ATP to each well, incubate, and wash
• Add anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, incubate, and wash
• Add horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, incubate and wash
• Develop by adding HRP substrate reagent to each well
• OD (optical density) measured by ELISA auto-reader (absorbance at 415 nm)
• IC50 obtained is [drug] resulting in 50% inhibition
The Power of Non-Covalent Interactions: ELISA-Based Colorimetric TK Assay
anti-phosphotyrosineantibody
OPO3-2
Y
SA
biotinylated peptide
HRP
B
N
N
N
O
O
R
H
H
CH2
H
H
H
OH
O
R'
H N
N
N
NH2
N
O
OHOH
OPO
O-
O
PO
O-
O
P-O
O-
O
TK
O-PO
O-
O
N
N
N
O
O
R
H
H
CH2
H
H
H
O
R'
H
ATP
signal
+
Proteinsubstrate
CHEM-4330 - Spring, 2004 - Module 2 24