council of state governments justice center | 1 emily morgan, senior policy analyst, council of...

31
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies from the Field to Keep Students Engaged in School and Out of the Juvenile Justice System

Upload: bruce-martin

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1

Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center

Nina Salomon, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center

School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies from the Field to Keep Students Engaged in School and Out of the Juvenile Justice System

Page 2: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 2

National nonprofit, nonpartisan membership association of state government officials

Represents all three branches of state government

Provides practical advice informed by the best available evidence

Page 3: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 3

Groundbreaking Texas Study Pushed States to Scrutinize Approaches to School Discipline

*Breaking Schools’ Rules, 2011, Council of State Governments. Students were followed through grades seven through twelve.

Nearly 60% of all middle and high school students experienced suspension

And 15% of all students were disciplined 11 or more separate times

Page 4: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 4

Realizing Top Goals Set by Policymakers Requires a Strategy to Improve School Discipline

Make young people feel welcome and supported in school

Close the achievement gap between white students and students of color

Improve high school graduation rates

Reduce the number of youth locked up in juvenile correctional facilities for minor offenses

Page 5: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 5

Federal Initiatives Dedicated to Improving School Discipline and Keeping Kids in School

Release of School Discipline Guidance

Package

Expansion of US Department of Education

Civil Rights Data Collection

Release of Correctional Education Guidance

Package

Page 6: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 6

Growing Number of States Taking Action

Introduced legislation in 2015 to improve school discipline, in addition to a number of other states that passed legislation in the last few years

Some states, including WA, NC, and GA have established legislative task forces or advocacy coalitions to tackle school discipline issues

VT

CT

IN

WA GA

NC

And others, such as CA have enacted comprehensive reforms and policy changes to tackle school discipline issues

CA

Page 7: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 7

Action is especially prevalent at school district level

Syracuse schools code of conduct approved

'Restorative Justice' A New Approach To Discipline At School

Suspension Rules Altered in New York City’s Revision of School Discipline Code

Los Angeles policy shift yields decline in school suspensions

Page 8: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 8

The Consensus Report Breaks New Ground

ComprehensiveConsensus-BasedField-Driven andPractical

Page 9: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 9

By creating welcoming, supportive, and secure learning environments, schools can reduce the likelihood that students will misbehave and improve educators’ ability to manage student behavior.

Conditions for Learning

Page 10: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 10

Some students who are repeatedly involved in their schools’ discipline systems may require additional supports and interventions including those that address unmet behavioral health, academic, or other needs.

TargetedBehavioral Interventions

Page 11: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 11

Working collaboratively, schools and local law enforcement can ensure schools are safe and that students are not arrested for minor misconduct.

School-Police Partnerships

Page 12: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 12

Recognizing the negative long-term consequences of involvement in the juvenile justice system, every effort should be made to keep students in school and out of court, particularly through diversion of students who commit minor school-based offenses.

Courts and Juvenile Justice

Page 13: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 13

• What data is currently tracked?

• What is the baseline number and rate at which students are being referred to law enforcement?

• What is the resulting outcomes of these referrals?

• What is the baseline number and rate at which students are being suspended or expelled?

• Have improvement targets been identified for reducing these rates?

• What are key performance indicators that can be tracked to measure progress towards achieving these targets?

• How can this data be collected and by whom?

Key Questions for Measuring the Impact of School Discipline System

Page 14: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 14

Example Key Performance Indicators on School-Based Referrals

• Number of law enforcement referrals / Number of students referred• Calls for service• Number of arrests or referrals to court from school and total number of

students arrested/referred• School-related case outcomes – are student cases:

• Dismissed• Diverted• Referred to pre-adjudication probation• Adjudicated• Confined

Disaggregated by offense type, race, ethnicity, gender, special education/ELL status

Page 15: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 15

Example Key Performance Indicators on School Climate and Discipline

• Number of students suspended in- and out-of-school and total number of suspensions

• Number of students expelled in- and out-of-school and total number of expulsions

• Number of students referred to alternative education and total number of placements

• Number of students with multiple disciplinary actions• Student, parent, staff perceptions of school safety, engagement,

and climate

Disaggregated by offense type, race, ethnicity, gender, special education/ELL status

Page 16: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 16

Example Key Program Process Measures

• Referrals to behavioral health services or student support teams

• Alternatives to discipline and referrals to school-based, community-based, court-based diversion programs

• Referrals to student planning centers• School transfers

Disaggregated by offense type, race, ethnicity, gender, special education/ELL status

Page 17: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 17

Majority of States and Jurisdictions Not Collecting and Reporting School Discipline or Climate Data

How many states publically report some school discipline data on their SEA website?

Of the 41 states, how many states provide information on the number of students suspended annually on their SEA website?

Of the 22 states, how many states provide information on the number of students suspended and expelled annually, disaggregated by race on their SEA website?

941 19 22 5 17

NoYes

NoYes

NoYes

Page 18: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 18

Key Elements for Improving Data Collection

BRINGrelevant

stakeholders together

EXAMINElocal referral

practices

STANDARDIZEdata codes and

definitions

EXPAND & SYSTEMIZE

data collection efforts

Page 19: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 19

Get People Together

Assemble key stakeholders committed to addressing school discipline and disparities, and use data to identify the greatest needs within the jurisdiction

BehavioralHealth

Professionals

CourtLeaders

Juvenile JusticeAdministrators

Parents

Youth

Police

Teachers

ProbationOfficials

SchoolAdministrators

Page 20: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 20

Standardize Key Definitions and CodesWISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION REMOVAL TYPESExpulsion removal from school grounds for purposes of discipline as imposed formally by the school board;

violations of school district rules, threats against school property, endangers those at school

Out-of-school Suspension removal from school grounds imposed by school administration; noncompliance with school district rule, threatening to destroy school property; endangers those at school

In-School suspension temporarily removed from regular classroom for disciplinary purposes but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel; no IEP services provided

Placement in IAES – School Personnel

school personnel order the removal of the student with disabilities from current educational placement to an interim alternativee education system; drug offenses, dangerous weapons offenses, causing serious bodily injury

CALIFORNIA DEFINITION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT REFERRALS IN STATE LAWReferral to law enforcement

Communication between a school administrator, teacher or other school employee and a law eforcement agency, which communication

(A) Is initiated by the school administrator, teacher, or other school employee; and(B) Concerns behavior by a student that the school administrator, teacher, or other school employee believes may constitute a violation of the school conduct and discipline code or a criminal or delinquent offense and for which the school administrator, teacher, or other school employee requests an investigation or other involvement by a law enforcement agency.

Does not include (A) Contact with a law enforcement agency that is made for the purpose of education, prevention, or intervention regarding a student's behavior; or(B) Routine or incidental communication between a school administrator, teacher, or other school employee and a law enforcement officer.

Page 21: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 21

A Number of States and Districts Are Expanding Data Collection Efforts

Page 22: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 22

Key Elements for Sharing and Using Data to Guide Policy and Practice

Resources:Make data user friendly, accessible, and easily understandable

Provide customizable reports for various audiences focused on key metrics

Determine benchmarks and track trends over time to evaluate impact of programs and system

Conduct regular data analysis and collect anecdotal evidence

Use data to target technical assistance, allocate resources, and scale up best practices.

Page 23: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 23

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Releases Annual Report on Referrals to Law Enforcement

In your state and jurisdiction, who is collecting this data?

How is it being compiled and reported?

Is the data integrated with other school discipline data in a shared electronic data system?

Is data being shared with appropriate stakeholders?

Page 24: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 24

Wisconsin Dashboard Model

Page 25: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 25

Define and Measure Success

School SafetyAttendance Academic Achievement

Do students feel safer in school?

Do students feel welcome in school?

Do students feel more supported and positioned to succeed?

Suspensions

Page 26: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 26

Students and families should have information on privacy and consent

Student record sharing is limited to those “who need to know” How, when, and for what reason information can be shared is

clearly articulated Information should be safeguarded Provide training so youth aren’t labeled or stigmatized Create oversight mechanisms to ensure students are treated fairly People with access to information need to be aware of re-

disclosure provisions Information-sharing is governed by federal and state laws and local

regulations

Core Principles to Guide Information-Sharing of Student-level Data

Page 27: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 27

• Prevents the disclosure of student education records and personally identifiable data within education records to non-authorized individuals without consent

• Directory information can be shared without consent (name, date of birth, grade level, etc.)

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)

Page 28: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 28

• School officials with a legitimate educational interest

• Health and safety emergencies• Judicial Actions• The Uninterrupted Scholars Act – provides

child welfare caseworkers with easier access to education records

Key FERPA Exemptions to Keep in Mind

Page 29: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 29

• Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

• Federal Drug and Alcohol Confidentiality Laws – 42 CFR Part 2

• Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA)

Additional Relevant Federal Privacy Laws

Page 30: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 30

• Navigating Information Sharing (NIS) Toolkit– http://www.promoteprevent.org/content/navigating-inf

ormation-sharing-toolkit

• Models for Change Information Sharing Toolkit– http://www.modelsforchange.net/publications/282

• Center for Juvenile Justice Reform Information Sharing Certificate Program– http://cjjr.georgetown.edu/certprogs/informationsharing

/certificateinformationsharing.html

Information Sharing Resources

Page 31: Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Emily Morgan, Senior Policy Analyst, Council of State Governments Justice Center Nina Salomon, Senior Policy

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 31

Thank You

The presentation was developed by members of the Council of State Governments Justice Center staff. The statements made reflect the views of the authors, and should not be considered the official position of the Justice Center, the members of the

Council of State Governments, or the funding agency supporting the work. Citations available for statistics presented in preceding slides available on CSG Justice Center web site.

Join our distribution list to receive CSG Justice Center project updates!

www.csgjusticecenter.org/subscribe

For more information, contact Nina Salomon ([email protected]) or Emily Morgan ([email protected])