coslor three art controversies (slides) 28 jan09

20
Hostile Worlds, Questionable Speculation & Contests of Meaning Three Types of Controversies Around Art Erica Coslor Doctoral Candidate, University of Chicago University of Edinburgh Sociology Seminar January 28, 2009 All pictures and charts are the intellectual property of their creators; They are included in this presentation for educational purposes only.

Upload: ecoslor

Post on 27-May-2015

247 views

Category:

Entertainment & Humor


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Sociological study of the contemporary art market

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Hostile Worlds, Questionable Speculation & Contests of MeaningThree Types of Controversies Around Art

Erica CoslorDoctoral Candidate, University of ChicagoUniversity of Edinburgh Sociology Seminar

January 28, 2009All pictures and charts are the intellectual property of their creators; They are included in this presentation for educational purposes only.

Page 2: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Overview

• Hostile Worlds – Art & Money• Questionable Speculation – Art Investment• Control of the Biography & the Prestige

Allocation System• Contests of Meaning – Art in Movement

Page 3: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Does Money Corrupt?Hostile Worlds vs. Independent Spheres

Page 4: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

‘Superprices’

‘Surfing Nurse’ by Richard PrinceSold for over £2.1 m in 2003

‘Oh S---’ by Damien HirstSold for over £2.3 b in Sept.

Page 5: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Questionable Speculation

Stocks

Bonds

Commodities

Page 6: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Mei/Moses Chart

Page 7: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Financializing Art

Stocks Bonds CommoditiesArt

Art InvestmentFunds

Financial Asset Classes

Repackaging Quantification & Measurement

Page 8: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Competing Arenas

Auction Houses40% of Sales

Art Galleries60% of Sales

Sales of high-end contemporary art. Sources: interviews, Wall Street Journal

Page 9: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

The Exchange Biography of Art

Museums

EstablishedCollectors

Artists ArtGalleries

‘GoodInvestors’

‘Speculators’ Art Auctions

Block Sales

Speculative Circuit

Long-Term Value Construction Circuit

Page 10: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Control of the Biography“We only sell to people that we know and trust.

If it is a seminal piece in an artist’s oeuvre then we only sell to certain trusted people. But, if it is a less established artist [or] work

of lesser importance then we are more open. We do encourage new collectors, but at the same time it is difficult, as we need to trust

them. We sell to people who will come to us before selling to anyone else.”

Page 11: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Prestige Allocation

“You can’t walk into Victoria Miro, and go, ‘I’d like this.’ …they’ll say, ‘Well, first of all,

we’ve sold out this show a month before we put it up. Second of all, there’s a two-year waiting list for this artist’s work. And

third of all, who are you? Can we have your name?”

Page 12: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Elite and Elistist“Yes, I mean it is something that I really dislike,

but it is something that is really cultivated as well. [Galleries] covet this mystique. They have a policy of not selling to new clients. You cannot just approach them and buy.

There are waiting lists for all of the work that they sell. It may be the case that this is

genuine, but I think it is all manufactured. People have this natural instinct to want what

they can’t have.”

Page 13: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Circulation & Contests of MeaningWhat happens when art moves to a different context?

Page 14: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Conclusions

• Contested commodity concerns are widely held and do matter.

• Hostile worlds are not the only relevant concern.• Speculative art buying is opposed for more

pragmatic reasons by art world insiders. • Meaning comes through context, and when art

moves, there can be a struggle over whether something is lost through that lack of context.

Page 15: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Thank you!

Presentation based on conference paper submitted to Arts, Culture & the Public Sphere,

Venice, Italy

Erica [email protected]

Page 16: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Selected References• Bolger (2006). "Is it just art, or is it investment?“• Chancellor, E. (2007). Popping the Art Bubble. The

Sunday Times. London: News Review: 8.• Velthuis, O. (2003). "Symbolic meanings of prices.

Constructing the value of contemporary art in Amsterdam and New York galleries." Theory and Society 32: 181-215.

• Velthuis, O. (2005). Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

See the full paper for more sources.

Page 17: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Competing Exchange Motives?

Profit-Seeking Exchange

Long-Term Value Construction for Art

‘Speculation’Short-Term Profits

(Problematic)

‘Investment’Long-Term Profits

(Acceptable & Expected)

LT-VALUEDAMAGING

LT-VALUEENHANCING

Page 18: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Additional Conclusions

Q: When is ‘Investment’ in Contemporary Art Acceptable to Galleries?

A: When you play by the rules of the gallery system– Long time horizon – No ‘flipping’ pieces– Work with the gallery – No arbitrage at

auction– Work within established networks

Page 19: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Comparing Returns

Chart Source: Hutter, Knebel, Pietzner, & Schäfer, 2007. Two games in town: a comparison of dealer and auction prices in contemporary visual arts markets.

Page 20: Coslor Three Art Controversies (Slides) 28 Jan09

Work on Art Pricing Strategies

• O’Neil 2008. “Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market” Poetics 36: 94-113

• Velthuis 2005. Talking Prices. Princeton.