corpus christi liquefaction, llc cheniere corpus christi ...corpus christi liquefaction, llc...

85
Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P. Stage 3 Project DRAFT Resource Report 1 — General Project Description Docket No. PF15-26-000 July 2015

Upload: others

Post on 12-Oct-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Stage 3 Project

    DRAFT Resource Report 1 — General Project Description Docket No. PF15-26-000

    July 2015

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC i July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Section Page

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i

    LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... ii

    LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ ii

    LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... ii

    ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... iii

    CHECKLIST OF FILING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. v

    1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1

    1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1

    1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................... 1-1

    1.3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITIES ............................... 1-2 1.3.1 LNG Facilities ................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.2 Pipeline Facilities ............................................................................................ 1-7

    1.4 PROJECT MAPS AND DRAWINGS ............................................................................. 1-8

    1.5 LAND REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................. 1-13 1.5.1 LNG Facilities ............................................................................................... 1-13 1.5.2 Pipeline Facilities .......................................................................................... 1-15

    1.6 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND WORKFORCE ............................................... 1-18

    1.7 CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES .............................................................................. 1-18 1.7.1 Stage 3 LNG Facilities .................................................................................. 1-19 1.7.2 Pipeline Facilities .......................................................................................... 1-21

    1.8 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ....................................................................... 1-26 1.8.1 Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities ...................................................................... 1-26 1.8.2 Pipeline .......................................................................................................... 1-27

    1.9 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT ................................................................ 1-28 1.9.1 Future Plans ................................................................................................... 1-28 1.9.2 Abandonment of Facilities............................................................................. 1-28

    1.10 PERMITS AND APPROVALS ..................................................................................... 1-28

    1.11 AFFECTED LANDOWNERS ...................................................................................... 1-30

    1.12 NONJURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES ........................................................................ 1-30 1.12.1 Identified Nonjurisdictional Facilities ........................................................... 1-30 1.12.2 Determination of the Need for FERC to Conduct an Environmental

    Review ........................................................................................................... 1-30

    1.13 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ........................................................................................... 1-31 1.13.1 Other Projects Potentially Contributing to Cumulative Effects ..................... 1-33 1.13.2 Potential Cumulative Effects ......................................................................... 1-37

    1.14 REFERENCES AND CONTACTS ............................................................................... 1-40

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC ii July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    LIST OF APPENDICES

    Appendix 1A Agency Correspondence

    Appendix 1B Adjacent and Affected Landowners (Privileged and Confidential)

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 1.3-1 Summary of Proposed Stage 3 Pipeline and Appurtenant Facilities................................ 1-7 Table 1.5-1 Land Requirements for the Stage 3 Project Liquefaction Facilities .............................. 1-13 Table 1.5-2 Land Requirements for the Stage 3 Pipeline and Associated Facilities ......................... 1-17 Table 1.10-1 Permits and Consultations for the Stage 3 Project ......................................................... 1-29 Table 1.13-1 Other Projects Potentially Contributing to Cumulative Impacts.................................... 1-34 Table 1.13-2 Cumulative Impacts of the Stage 3 and Other Projects in the Project Area .................. 1-38

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure 1.3-1 Artist Impression of Stage 3 Project (view to the South) ................................................ 1-3 Figure 1.3-2 Artist Impression of Stage 3 Project (foreground) and Liquefaction Project

    (background) (view to the South) .................................................................................... 1-6 Figure 1.4-1 Project Location Map ....................................................................................................... 1-9 Figure 1.4-2 Terminal Site Plan ......................................................................................................... 1-10 Figure 1.4-3 LNGC Transit Route ...................................................................................................... 1-11 Figure 1.4-4 Stage 3 Pipeline Route ................................................................................................... 1-12 Figure 1.5-1 Land Requirements for Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities ................................................ 1-14 Figure 1.5-2 Stage 3 Pipeline Right-of-Way ...................................................................................... 1-16

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC iii July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

    AEP American Electric Power

    API American Petroleum Institute

    AQCR air quality control regions

    ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    ATWS additional temporary workspace

    Bcf/d billion standard cubic feet per day

    BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene

    CEII critical energy infrastructure information

    CEQ Council on Environmental Quality

    CFR Code of Federal Regulations

    CCL Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC

    CCPL Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    CI Chief Inspector

    CMMS computerized maintenance management system

    CO2 carbon dioxide

    Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    DLE dry low emissions

    DMPA Dredged Material Placement Area

    DRI Direct Reduced Iron

    EI Environmental Inspector

    ESD emergency shutdown

    EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    GOM Gulf of Mexico

    H2S hydrogen sulfide

    HDD horizontal directional drill

    hp horsepower

    HUC Hydrologic Unit Code

    LNG liquefied natural gas

    LNGC LNG carrier

    m3

    cubic meters

    M&R meter and regulation

    MAOP maximum allowable operating pressure

    MLV mainline valve

    MMcf/d million cubic feet per day

    MP milepost

    MW megawatts

    NFPA National Fire Protection Association

    NGA Natural Gas Act

    NGL Natural Gas Liquids

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC iv July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System

    OEP Office of Energy Projects

    O&M operations and maintenance

    PCB polychlorinated biphenyls

    PERC powered emergency release coupling

    POCCA Port of Corpus Christi Authority

    Plan FERC’s Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan

    Procedures FERC’s Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures

    Project Stage 3 Project and Stage 3 Pipeline

    psig pounds per square inch gauge

    Stage 3 Pipeline 22-mile-long, 42-inch-diameter pipeline

    Stage 3 Project proposed expansion of the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project

    T&E threatened and endangered

    TCEQ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

    TEU twenty-foot equivalent unit

    USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    USCG U.S. Coast Guard

    USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC v July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    Filing Requirement Location in

    Environmental Report

    1. Provide a detailed description and location map of the project facilities. (§ 380.12(c)(1))

    Include all pipeline and aboveground facilities.

    Include support areas for construction or operation.

    Identify facilities to be abandoned.

    Sections 1.3 and 1.4; Figure

    1.4-1 and Figure 1.4-2

    2. Describe any nonjurisdictional facilities that would be built in association with the

    project.(§ 380.12(c)(2))

    Include auxiliary facilities (See § 2.55(a)).

    Describe the relationship to the jurisdictional facilities.

    Include ownership, land requirements, gas consumption, megawatt size, construction status, and an update of the latest status of Federal, state, and local

    permits/approvals.

    Include the length and diameter of any interconnecting pipeline.

    Apply the four-factor test to each facility (see § 380.12(c) (2) (ii)).

    Section 1.12

    3. Provide current original U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute-series topographic

    maps with mileposts showing the project facilities. (§ 380.12(c)(3))

    Maps of equivalent detail are acceptable if legible (check with staff)

    Show locations of all linear project elements, and label them.

    Show locations of all significant aboveground facilities, and label them.

    Section 1.4, Appendix 1A

    4. Provide aerial images or photographs or alignment sheets based on these sources with

    mileposts showing the project facilities. (§ 380.12(c)(3))

    No more than 1-year old

    Scale no smaller than 1:6,000

    Future Draft of Resource

    Report 1

    5. Provide plot/site plans of compressor stations showing the location of the nearest noise

    sensitive areas (NSA) within 1 mile. (§ 380.12(c)(3,4))

    Scale no smaller than 1:3,600

    Show reference to topographic maps and aerial alignments provided above.

    NSA figures in Resource

    Report 9

    6. Describe construction and restoration methods. (§ 380.12(c)(6))

    Include this information by milepost

    Make sure this is provided for offshore construction as well. For the offshore construction, this information is needed on a mile-by-mile basis and will require completion of geophysical and other surveys before filing.

    Section 1.7

    7. Identify the permits required for construction across surface waters. (§ 380.12(c)(9))

    Include the status of all permits.

    For construction in the Federal offshore area be sure to include consultation with the MMS. File with the MMS for rights-of-way grants at the same time or before

    you file with the FERC.

    Section 1.10

    8. Provide the names and address of all affected landowners and certify that all affected

    landowners will be notified as required in § 157.6(d). (§ 380.12(c)(10))

    Affected landowners are defined in § 157.6(d)

    Provide an electronic copy directly to the environmental staff.

    Section 1.11,

    Appendix 1B

    9. Describe all authorizations required to complete the proposed action and the status of applications for such authorizations.

    Section 1.10

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC vi July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    Filing Requirement Location in

    Environmental Report

    10. Provide detailed typical construction right-of-way cross-section diagrams showing

    information such as widths and relative locations of existing rights-of-way, new permanent

    right-of-way, and temporary construction right-of-way. See Resource Report 8.

    Figure 1.5-2

    11. Summarize the total acreage of land affected by construction and operation of the

    project.

    Section 1.5

    12. If Resource Report 5, Socioeconomics is not provided, provide the start and end dates of

    construction, the number of pipeline spreads that would be used, and the workforce per

    spread.

    Section 1.6; also see Resource

    Report 5

    13. Send two (2) additional copies of topographic maps and aerial images/photographs

    directly to the environmental staff of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP).

    Future Draft of Resource

    Report 1

    14. Identify other projects in the area that could contribute to cumulative impacts. Section 1.13

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-1 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    1.1 INTRODUCTION

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC (“CCL”) and Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P. (“CCPL”) propose

    to construct and operate an expansion (“Stage 3 Project”) of the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project

    approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) in Docket No.

    CP12-507-000 and currently under construction (“Liquefaction Project”), as well as new associated bi-

    directional interstate natural gas pipeline facilities (“Stage 3 Pipeline”). The Stage 3 Project consists of

    the addition of two liquefaction trains and a fourth liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) tank to the Liquefaction

    Project. In order to deliver feed gas to the Stage 3 Project, CCPL is proposing to construct and operate

    the Stage 3 Pipeline, a new 22-mile-long, 42-inch-diameter pipeline that would run parallel to the

    48-inch-diameter Corpus Christi Pipeline approved by the Commission in Docket No. CP12-508-000.

    The Stage 3 Project and Stage 3 Pipeline are referred to collectively as the “Project”.

    Resource Report 1 describes the facilities associated with the Project, the purpose and need for the

    Project, land requirements, construction procedures, operation procedures, Project schedule, permits and

    approvals that will be required, non-jurisdictional facilities, and cumulative effects. Resource Reports 2

    through 9 describe the resources at the Project site, the potential impacts on those resources from

    construction and operation of the Project, and measures proposed to mitigate those impacts. Resource

    Report 10 describes the “No Action” alternative as well as possible system and facility siting and

    configuration alternatives. Resource Report 11 describes the design, construction, operation, and

    maintenance measures to maximize Project reliability and minimize potential hazards to the public from

    failure of Project components as a result of accidents or natural catastrophes. Resource Report 12,

    pertaining to polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCB”), is not applicable, as the Project does not involve the

    removal, replacement, or abandonment of PCB-contaminated facilities. Resource Report 13 provides a

    detailed description of the liquefaction facilities, as well as detailed engineering and design information.

    Two versions of Resource Report 13 are included with the Stage 3 Project Application, a public version

    and a version that contains critical energy infrastructure information (“CEII”) or confidential and

    proprietary engineering and design material that will not be available to the public.

    1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED

    The natural gas industry in the U.S. has enjoyed significant growth the past several years based on

    technological improvements that have made the exploration and production of gas more economical.

    International demand for natural gas has been enhanced by its favorable environmental properties

    compared to many fuels and its potential role as a backup fuel to intermittent renewable energy sources.

    Developing economies around the world are also in need of low-cost, environmentally-friendly fuels to

    facilitate growth.

    The Project would be consistent with ongoing development of U.S. natural gas resources and expanding

    access to world markets. The ability to export domestic gas as LNG greatly expands the market scope and

    access for domestic natural gas producers.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-2 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITIES

    The following sections provide detailed descriptions of the LNG facilities (Section 1.3.1) and pipeline

    facilities (Section 1.3.2) associated with the Project.

    1.3.1 LNG Facilities

    The facilities to be constructed for the Stage 3 LNG Facilities include LNG liquefaction facilities

    (Section 1.3.1.1), LNG storage facilities (Section 1.3.1.2), and other infrastructure (Section 1.3.1.3). All

    components will be sited, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with applicable federal and

    state regulations. The Stage 3 LNG Facilities will utilize the marine facilities currently authorized for the

    Liquefaction Project (Section 1.3.1.4).

    1.3.1.1 Liquefaction Facilities

    The liquefaction portion of the Stage 3 Project will consist of two ConocoPhillips Optimized Cascade®

    LNG liquefaction trains designed to produce a maximum of approximately 5 million tonnes per annum of

    LNG. The LNG liquefaction trains will be an identical design to those being constructed for the

    Liquefaction Project.

    Each LNG liquefaction train will contain the following equipment:

    Facilities to remove carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and other sulfur compounds from the feed

    gas;

    Facilities to remove water and mercury from the feed gas;

    Facilities to remove heavy hydrocarbons from the feed gas;

    A thermal oxidizer for combusting waste gas;

    Six aeroderivative mechanical drive LM2500 G4+ gas turbines with dry low emissions (“DLE”)

    combustion systems for emissions control;

    Inlet air chilling exchanger for gas turbines;

    Multiple ethylene, propane and methane refrigerant compressors and associated cold boxes;

    Waste heat recovery systems;

    Induced draft air coolers;

    Associated fire and gas and safety systems; and

    Associated control systems and electrical infrastructure.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-3 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.3-1 Artist Impression of Stage 3 Project (view to the South)

    Impurities removed from the natural gas stream prior to liquefaction will be disposed of as follows:

    Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (“BTEX”) and acid gas are passed through a triazine

    scavenger bed which absorbs any hydrogen sulfide (“H2S”). The remaining waste gas (with

    carbon dioxide [“CO2”) is then mixed with a small amount of fuel gas and sent to a thermal

    oxidizer. The spent solvent is sent to a licensed disposal facility.

    Mercury is absent from the feed gas. However, as a precaution, mercury removal beds will be

    provided, and any collected will be sent to a licensed disposal facility.

    1.3.1.2 LNG Storage

    The LNG will be stored in one full-containment storage tank. The tank will be designed to store a

    nominal volume of 160,000 cubic meters (m3) (1,006,400 barrels) of LNG at a temperature of -270ºF and

    a maximum internal pressure of 3.5 pounds per square inch gauge (“psig”) (though the normal operating

    conditions will be -260ºF and 1.5 psig). The tank system will meet the requirements of National Fire

    Protection Association (“NFPA”) 59A, 49 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 193, and American

    Petroleum Institute (“API”) Standard 620 Appendix Q. A typical full containment LNG storage tank is

    shown in a figure included in Appendix 1A. The major components of the tank will consist of:

    A 9% nickel steel inner container, designed to withstand the hydrostatic pressures and cryogenic

    temperatures of the LNG, as well as the predicted seismic, insulation, and thermal gradient loads.

    The space between the inner container and the outer container will be insulated with expanded

    perlite to maintain the outer container at near ambient temperature. The insulation beneath the

    inner container will be cellular glass load-bearing insulation that will support the weight of the

    inner container and the LNG.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-4 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    An outer tank comprised of reinforced concrete with a domed concrete roof. The outer tank is

    designed for the following conditions:

    o The specified internal pressure of 3.5 psig;

    o Sustained wind velocity of 150 miles per hour without the loss of structural or functional

    integrity, which meets or exceeds the requirements of 49 CFR § 193.2067;

    o Seismic loads in accordance with NFPA 59A and the site specific seismic reports;

    o Internal pressure imposed by insulation loads; and

    o Roof and platform dead loads.

    An insulated aluminum deck over the inner container, suspended from the roof. The aluminum

    support deck will be insulated with fiberglass blankets so that the outer tank roof and vapor space

    above the suspended deck are essentially at ambient temperature. The vapor pressure from the

    LNG will be equalized through ports in the suspended deck and will be contained by the outer

    container.

    The tank will be supported on a reinforced concrete foundation. Electric base heating will be installed in

    the concrete foundation to prevent frost heave.

    Tank Accessories

    Five in-tank pump well columns will be installed in the tank. Four pump well columns will be fully

    installed with foot valve, electrical, supports, instrumentation, piping, etc., for a complete system. The

    fifth pump well column will be equipped with a foot valve only for a future spare pump. All LNG piping

    will enter the tank through the concrete tank roof. All piping systems will be in accordance with

    American Society of Mechanical Engineers (“ASME”) B31.3 and NFPA 59A Chapter 6.

    The LNG tank will also be provided with the following accessories:

    A cool down temperature detection system to monitor the inner tank bottom plate and inner tank

    shell continuously during cool-down procedures;

    Foundation temperature sensors located at strategic locations under the tank;

    Instrumentation to monitor the quality and level of LNG in the tank and to monitor tank contents

    for stratification;

    A safety-rated control system to monitor the LNG level and control the fill line shutoff valves;

    Pressure and vacuum relief systems;

    Platforms, elevators, and stairways with intermediate landings attached to the outer tank;

    Spill protection of the tank roof over the edge of the roof dome;

    Lighting and aircraft warning lights;

    Electrical grounding system;

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-5 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    A settlement monitoring system to measure and record inner and outer container movements

    during construction, hydrostatic testing, and operation; and

    Seismic monitors.

    Although the LNG storage tank is full containment and does not require additional full spill containment

    per code, a berm will be constructed around the LNG storage tank and LNG trains to contain 100 percent

    of the volume of the LNG storage tank.

    1.3.1.3 Other Terminal Infrastructure

    In addition to the facilities listed above, the Project will require the following terminal facilities and

    infrastructure:

    Expansion of Liquefaction Project control building to accommodate Stage 3 Project facilities;

    Miscellaneous buildings and other structures to accommodate employees, equipment, utilities and support services infrastructure;

    Warehouse to store spare parts and consumables for the liquefaction, regasification and utility facilities;

    Maintenance building;

    Remote I/O buildings and substations;

    Storage tanks for ethylene refrigerants, amine make up and liquid nitrogen;

    Spill containment facilities;

    Emergency shutdown (“ESD”) systems;

    Firewater system, including diesel driven pumps and storage tank;

    Wet and dry flares;

    Instrument air compressor packages;

    Security and perimeter control systems;

    Telecoms, IT, CCTV and other systems;

    Potable water, service water, and demineralized water systems;

    Pipeline gas compressor;

    Inlet air chilling equipment;

    Pipeline interconnect for the receipt of natural gas as well as export to the pipeline;

    Electric facilities, switchgear, transformers, and other electrical accessories; and

    LNG transfer line to Liquefaction Project storage tanks.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-6 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.3-2 Artist Impression of Stage 3 Project (foreground) and Liquefaction Project (background)

    (view to the South)

    1.3.1.4 Marine Facilities

    The marine terminal facilities required for mooring and loading LNG carriers (“LNGCs”) for the Stage 3

    Project will be the same facilities utilized by the currently-authorized the Liquefaction Project. No new

    marine facilities will be required for the Stage 3 Project.

    The only impact that the Stage 3 Project will have on marine operations is an anticipated increase in the

    maximum marine vessel traffic from the currently-authorized 300 LNGCs up to 400 LNGCs per year.

    CCL has been in contact with the U.S. Coast Guard (“USCG”) and is preparing a follow-on Waterway

    Suitability Assessment for submittal to the USCG to seek approval for the increase of 100 LNGCs per

    year.

    The same tugs used for the currently-authorized Liquefaction Project will be available to facilitate

    maneuvering of LNGCs for the Stage 3 Project.

    Deepwater access from the Gulf of Mexico (“GOM”) to the Stage 3 Project is via a federally-maintained

    channel that extends from the open GOM, through the entrance jetties at Aransas Pass, along the Corpus

    Christi Ship Channel and up the La Quinta Ship Channel. This is the same route already analyzed by the

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-7 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    USCG for the currently-authorized Liquefaction Project. The general access route is shown on Figure 1.4-

    3.

    1.3.2 Pipeline Facilities

    The Stage 3 Pipeline will consist of:

    An approximately 22-mile-long, 42-inch-diameter pipeline originating north of the City of

    Sinton, Texas and terminating at the Stage 3 Project LNG facilities;

    Additional compression at the Sinton Compressor Station;

    Appurtenant facilities including metering, pressure regulation and filter separation;

    Launcher/receiver facilities at both ends of the 22-mile-long pipeline; and

    Mainline valve (“MLV”) facilities.

    The Stage 3 Pipeline operating facilities will be designed for a maximum allowable operating pressure

    (“MAOP”) of 1,440 psig and a capacity of approximately 1.5 billion standard cubic feet per day

    (“Bcf/d”). The pipeline facilities will be located entirely within San Patricio County, Texas.

    The Stage 3 Pipeline facilities are summarized in Table 1.3-1 and are described in detail in the following

    sections.

    TABLE 1.3-1

    Summary of Proposed Stage 3 Pipeline and Appurtenant Facilities

    Facility Length (miles)

    Diameter (inches)

    Location (MP)

    Megawatts Description

    Pipeline

    Stage 3 Pipeline 22.0 42 N/A N/A New pipeline to connect Stage 3 Project LNG facilities to natural gas pipeline supply points

    Compressor Station

    Sinton Compressor Station Expansion

    N/A N/A 22.0 32 Electric motor drive compression

    Meter and Regulation Stations

    Stage 3 LNG Facilities M&R Station

    N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Install M&R station to feed gas into the Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities

    M&R Stations N/A N/A TBD N/A TBD

    Appurtenant Facilities

    Pig Launcher N/A 42 22.0 N/A Pig launcher at Stage 3 Liquefaction M&R Station

    Pig Receiver N/A 42 0.0 N/A Pig receiver at pipeline terminus

    Mainline Valves N/A 42 TBD N/A TBD

    N/A – not applicable.

    TBD – to be determined.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-8 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.3.2.1 Pipeline

    CCPL will construct approximately 22 miles of new 42-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline, originating at

    the Sinton Compressor Station and generally routed parallel to the currently-authorized 48-inch-diameter

    Corpus Christi Pipeline (Docket Number CP12-508-000). The Stage 3 Pipeline will terminate at the Stage

    3 Project LNG facilities.

    1.3.2.2 Compressor Station

    The Sinton Compressor Station has been authorized and is being built as part of the Liquefaction Project

    (Docket Numbers CP12-507-000 and CP12-508-000). The Stage 3 Pipeline will require additional

    compression at the Sinton Compressor Station, which will consist of the addition of approximately 32

    megawatts (“MW”) of electric motor drive compression (two 16 MW units). The Sinton Compressor

    Station, including the facilities to be added for the Stage 3 Project, will be remotely operated.

    1.3.2.3 Meter and Regulation Stations

    CCPL is still in the process of pipeline design and therefore has not identified the locations of all meter

    and regulation (“M&R”) stations. Typically these will be installed at locations where the Stage 3 Pipeline

    intersects other third-party pipelines. CCPL will provide additional information on these facilities in a

    subsequent version of Resource Report 1. Typically, these M&R stations are remotely operated and the

    following facilities are installed.

    M&R facilities;

    Filter separators;

    Liquid handling tanks;

    Gas chromatograph building; and

    Pressure/flow control.

    1.4 PROJECT MAPS AND DRAWINGS

    The general location of the proposed Stage 3 Project is shown in Figure 1.4-1, and a site plan drawing for

    the Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities is shown in Figure 1.4-2. Figure 1.4-3, LNGC Transit Route, identifies

    the LNGC route from the U.S. territorial waters to the marine berth approved as part of the Liquefaction

    Project. Figure 1.4-4 identifies the Stage 3 Pipeline route. Figure 1.5-1 identifies land requirements for

    the Stage 3 LNG Facilities. Figure 1.5-2 is an illustration of the Stage 3 Pipeline right-of-way.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-9 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.4-1 Project Location Map

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-10 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.4-2 Terminal Site Plan

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-11 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.4-3 LNGC Transit Route

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-12 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.4-4 Stage 3 Pipeline Route

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-13 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.5 LAND REQUIREMENTS

    The land requirements for the Stage 3 LNG Facilities and Stage 3 Pipeline are presented in Sections 1.5.1

    and 1.5.2, respectively.

    1.5.1 LNG Facilities

    Nearly all of the Stage 3 LNG facilities will be constructed within Dredged Material Placement Area

    (“DMPA”) 2, which was formerly used as a bauxite residue disposal bed and has been authorized for use

    for dredged material placement for the construction of the marine berths for the Liquefaction Project.

    DMPA 2 is approximately 385 acres in size.

    Table 1.5-1 lists the land requirements for the Stage 3 Project Liquefaction Facilities. Construction of the

    Stage 3 Project LNG facilities will require approximately 826 acres of land, of which 658 acres (80%)

    will have been impacted by the currently-authorized Liquefaction Project. Operation of the Stage 3

    Project will require approximately 368 acres of land, of which 351 acres was previously approved for

    operation of the Liquefaction Project. Details on any necessary exclusion zones have not yet been

    finalized and will be provided in a subsequent version of Resource Report 1.

    TABLE 1.5-1

    Land Requirements for the Stage 3 Project Liquefaction Facilities

    Facility

    Construction Operation

    Land Impacted by Liquefaction Project (acres)

    New Land Impacts (acres)

    Total (acres)

    Land Impacted by Liquefaction Project (acres)

    New Land Impacts (acres)

    Total (acres)

    Stage 3 LNG Facilities 351 17 368 351 17 368

    Construction Parking / Laydown Areas

    307 151 458 0 0 0

    Total 658 168 826 351 17 368

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-14 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.5-1 Land Requirements for Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-15 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.5.2 Pipeline Facilities

    The land requirements for the Stage 3 Pipeline facilities are presented in the following sections.

    1.5.2.1 Pipeline

    The proposed 42-inch-diameter Stage 3 Pipeline will be installed generally parallel to the previously-

    approved 48-inch-diameter Corpus Christi Pipeline. The Stage 3 Pipeline will be constructed utilizing a

    nominal 105-foot-wide construction right-of-way and a permanent right-of-way width of 75 feet shared

    with the 48-inch-diameter Corpus Christi Pipeline. In wetlands, the construction right-of-way will be a

    nominal 75 feet wide.

    The 105-foot-wide nominal pipeline construction right-of-way is necessary to accommodate the trench

    depth and width necessary to install a 42-inch-diameter pipe and to accommodate the segregation of

    topsoil along much of the length of the pipeline. The proposed right-of-way will also provide heavy

    equipment operators the necessary workspace to maintain safe and efficient separation distances between

    the potentially unstable trench sidewalls and their equipment. In addition, this workspace will ensure that

    heavy equipment has adequate separation between the construction activities and the parallel 48-inch-

    diameter Corpus Christi Pipeline and other nearby foreign pipelines.

    Additional temporary work space (“ATWS”) areas of varying dimensions (located immediately adjacent

    to the proposed nominal right-of-way) will also be required to account for site-specific constructability

    issues such as road and waterbody crossings.

    Following construction, 25 feet of additional permanent easement will be required adjacent to the 50-foot-

    wide permanent easement for the 48-inch-diameter pipeline, making the total permanent easement 75 feet

    wide. The remaining 80 feet of temporary workspace and all of the ATWS areas utilized during

    construction will be allowed to return to pre-construction land use.

    Figure 1.5-2 shows the configuration of the workspace for the 42-inch-diameter and 48-inch-diameter

    pipelines. Table 1.5-2 shows the workspace acreages associated with construction and operation of the

    Stage 3 Pipeline facilities.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-16 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Figure 1.5-2 Stage 3 Pipeline Right-of-Way

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-17 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    TABLE 1.5-2

    Land Requirements for the Stage 3 Pipeline and Associated Facilities

    Facility

    Construction Operation

    Land Impacted by Liquefaction

    Project (acres)

    New Land

    Impacts (acres)

    Total (acres)

    Land Impacted by Liquefaction

    Project (acres)

    New Land

    Impacts (acres)

    Total (acres)

    Pipeline Right-of-Way

    Pipeline 213.3 110 323.3 0 110 110

    Additional Temporary Workspace 0 38 38 0 0 0

    Compressor Station

    Sinton Compressor Station 17.2 9.3 26.5 7.3 TBD TBD

    M&R Stations

    Liquefaction M&R Station (MP 0.0) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

    M&R Stations TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

    Launchers/MLVs

    Pig Launcher and MLV (MP 0.0) 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Pig Receiver and MLV (MP 22.0) 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Access Roads/Yards

    Access Roads TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

    Contractor and Pipe Yard TBD TBD TBD 0 0 0

    Total

    TBD – to be determined.

    1.5.2.2 Compressor Station

    The Sinton Compressor Station is being constructed as part of the currently-authorized 48-inch-diameter

    Corpus Christi Pipeline. The new Stage 3 facilities at the Sinton Compressor Station will be constructed

    within a 26.5 acre area, of which 17.2 acres is within the existing Sinton Compressor Station boundary

    and 9.3 acres are new impacts associated with the Stage 3 Pipeline. New land impacts associated with

    operation of the Sinton Compressor Station have yet to be determined.

    1.5.2.3 M&R Stations

    The details of the M&R stations are still under development. M&R stations will be required at the Stage 3

    LNG Facilities to source the 1.5 Bcf/d of gas to the terminal. There will also be an expansion to the

    existing M&R station at the terminus of the Stage 3 Pipeline.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-18 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.5.2.4 Launcher/Receiver

    CCPL will construct and operate permanent pig launcher/receiver facilities at each end of the Stage 3

    Pipeline. The launcher and receiver will not have additional land requirements outside of the pipeline

    right-of-way.

    1.5.2.5 Mainline Valves

    The placement of MLV’s along the Stage 3 Pipeline is under development and will be provided in a

    subsequent version of Resource Report 1. The MLVs will be located within the permanent easement of

    the Stage 3 Pipeline and will generally require a construction and operation area of 0.2 acre.

    1.6 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND WORKFORCE

    CCL anticipates starting construction of the Stage 3 LNG Facilities in the 2nd

    Quarter of 2017.

    Construction of the Stage 3 LNG Facilities is estimated to take approximately 3.5 years to complete.

    Construction of the Stage 3 Pipeline and aboveground facilities is expected to take approximately one

    year to complete. The Stage 3 Pipeline is currently planned for a start of construction in the 2nd

    Quarter

    of 2018.

    Information regarding anticipated construction workforce is provided in Resource Report 5.

    1.7 CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES

    All Project components will be sited, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with all

    applicable federal and state regulations. The Stage 3 Project will implement and adhere to the FERC’s

    Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (“Plan”) and the Wetland and Waterbody

    Construction and Mitigation Procedures (“Procedures”)1. Wetland areas that will be temporarily or

    permanently impacted during construction and operation of the Project will be mitigated as agreed upon

    with the state and federal resource and regulatory agencies. Wetland impacts and mitigation will be

    addressed in a Project wetland mitigation plan. CCL and CCPL will work with the U.S. Army Corps of

    Engineers (“USACE”) to develop any necessary mitigation plan.

    CCL and CCPL will employ a tracking system to ensure that relevant clearances and permits are received

    prior to requesting approval to begin construction from the FERC. For purposes of quality assurance and

    compliance with mitigation measures, other applicable regulatory requirements, and Project

    specifications, the Stage 3 Project will be represented on site by a Chief Inspector (“CI”). One or more

    craft inspectors and one or more Environmental Inspectors (“EIs”) will assist the CI. All Stage 3 Project

    inspectors will have access to the relevant compliance specifications and other documents contained in

    the construction contracts. The EI’s duties will be fully consistent with those contained in paragraph II.B

    (Responsibilities of the Environmental Inspector) of the Plan to ensure that the environmental conditions

    associated with other permits or authorizations are satisfied. The EI(s) will have authority to stop work or

    1 Available on the FERC website at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/guidelines.asp.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-19 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    require other corrective action(s) to achieve environmental compliance. In addition to monitoring

    compliance, the EI’s duties will include training Project personnel about environmental requirements and

    reporting compliance status to the contractors, Stage 3 Project management, the FERC, and other

    agencies, as required.

    An environmental training program tailored to construction and management personnel will be

    developed. The program will be designed to ensure that:

    Qualified environmental training personnel provide thorough and well-focused training sessions

    regarding the environmental requirements applicable to the trainees’ activities;

    All individuals receive environmental training before they begin work;

    Adequate training records are kept; and

    Refresher training is provided as needed to maintain high awareness of environmental

    requirements.

    1.7.1 Stage 3 LNG Facilities

    1.7.1.1 Temporary Construction Facilities

    The main construction offices will be located either on-site or in a nearby construction laydown or

    parking area approved by the Commission for construction use. Support/satellite offices, warehousing,

    lunchrooms, temporary access roads, parking lots, and material laydown storage will be erected as

    necessary to support craft labor.

    Additional temporary facilities, primarily laydown areas and parking, will be located on site or in close

    proximity to the site. Detailed information regarding temporary use areas will be provided in Resource

    Report 8.

    1.7.1.2 LNG Facilities (LNG Trains)

    There are two critical paths for this Project; the erection of the ConocoPhillips Optimized Cascade® LNG

    Trains and the construction of the full containment tank. The execution strategy will be structured to

    prevent slowing construction in these areas.

    The foundation types for equipment, buildings, and pipe racks have yet to be determined and will be

    described in a subsequent version of Resource Report 1. Pipe installation on the pipe racks will be

    implemented from multiple directions after installation of the pipe racks. Pipe spool fabrication will be

    done in a covered area on or off-site. Structural steel members will be prefabricated off-site and erected

    upon arrival.

    The majority of the straight run pipe will be field fabricated prior to placement on the pipe racks. Pipe

    expansion loops will be pre-fabricated in a shop, transported to position, and then erected with the straight

    run piping. Pipe will also be painted to the maximum extent at the shops, after shop welds have been

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-20 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    tested in accordance with the applicable codes. Pipe spool size will be as large as can be practically

    trucked to site to minimize site work and the number of deliveries.

    Wherever practical, large equipment will arrive at site in preassembled packages that will facilitate final

    hook-up and testing. All equipment will be designed, fabricated, and tested by highly qualified specialist

    suppliers at their respective facilities, and shipped to site only after the necessary inspections and testing

    have taken place and the equipment is released. The larger equipment, such as the cold boxes, acid gas

    absorber, and the refrigerant compressors, will be offloaded at the Corpus Christi Liquefaction

    construction dock on multi-wheel transport crawlers, and transported to their foundations. Other material

    and equipment will be delivered to site by truck.

    When construction is approximately 70% complete, the focus will shift from construction by area to

    completion by systems. The civil and structural work will be substantially complete, the equipment set,

    and most of the large bore piping installed. The Project schedule will be driven by the mechanical

    completion and pre-commissioning requirements. The system completion and turnover packages will be

    defined and scoped by engineering, and assembled by the construction team. A turnover coordinator will

    prepare the systems completion and turnover packages which will include the following documentation:

    Marked-up drawings to show the limit of the system and the location of blinds;

    Line list by system with pressure testing documentation;

    List of equipment including motors with data sheets and inspection reports;

    Marked-up Single Line Diagrams with inspection/test reports for electrical equipment;

    Cable reports;

    Instrument Index with data sheets and calibration sheets;

    Loop Diagrams;

    Any applicable vendor documentation/drawings;

    Turnover Exception Lists; and

    Detailed punchlist.

    As the piping installation, hydrostatic testing, pneumatic testing, and equipment erection work is

    completed and the density of craft personnel and construction equipment is reduced within each of the

    areas, the balance of the painting and insulation work will be completed. The pipe racks will be

    completed first followed by the process and utility areas. After the installation of the equipment and

    piping has been completed, the final road paving, site grading, landscaping and cleanup will be done. The

    temporary construction facilities will be demobilized on a progressive basis when they are no longer

    needed.

    Construction of other necessary facilities and other buildings, as well as foundations and major utility

    equipment will commence once construction of the LNG Trains has begun. Emphasis will be placed on

    coordinating the arrival of the major equipment with the completion and curing of the respective

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-21 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    foundation so that the equipment can be placed on its foundation when it arrives. This will avoid double

    handling and intermediate storage on site.

    The buildings are independent sites and will be constructed simultaneously with the liquefaction facilities,

    so that electrical and instrument contractors can install their equipment according to their respective

    schedules.

    1.7.1.3 LNG Storage

    Construction of the LNG storage tank will follow the sequence shown in a figure included to be included

    in Appendix 1A.

    1.7.1.4 Site Access and Traffic

    Construction traffic will access the site via U.S. Highway 181. Once at the site, construction traffic will

    utilize La Quinta Road, which parallels the western boundary of the property. Material deliveries to the

    site will be via truck using the same access point as construction traffic. Heavy material delivery will

    occur via barge to the on-site construction dock. Additional information on construction traffic and

    material deliveries will be provided in Resource Report 5.

    1.7.2 Pipeline Facilities

    All Stage 3 Pipeline facilities will be sited, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with all

    applicable federal and state regulations and industry standards. The following sections identify the general

    construction procedures for routine pipeline construction, as well as the specialized construction

    techniques that will be utilized in environmentally sensitive areas.

    1.7.2.1 Standard Construction and Restoration Techniques

    The following sections identify the general construction procedures for routine pipeline construction.

    Right-of-Way Survey

    Prior to the start of construction, land surveys will be conducted and the Stage 3 Pipeline centerline and

    the boundaries of the construction workspace will be marked with stakes. Existing utility lines and other

    sensitive resources, identified in landowner easement agreements or by federal/state/local agencies, will

    be located and marked to prevent accidental damage during Pipeline construction. Prior to construction,

    CCPL’s contractors will contact the “Call Before You Dig” or “One Call” system to verify and mark all

    utilities along the Pipeline workspaces to minimize the potential for damage to other buried facilities in

    the area.

    Vegetation Clearing

    Clearing operations will include the removal of vegetation within the Stage 3 Pipeline right-of-way and

    the temporary construction workspace by mechanical or hand cutting. The limits of clearing will be

    identified and marked as part of the right-of-way survey activities described above.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-22 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Workspace Grading

    The entire width of the construction right-of-way, including the temporary construction workspace, may

    be rough graded as necessary to allow for the safe passage of equipment and to prepare the work surface

    for Stage 3 Pipeline installation activities. Typically, the grading of the right-of-way will be completed

    with bulldozers.

    Topsoil segregation methods will be used in agricultural areas (there are no residential areas along the

    route), unless otherwise approved in writing by the landowner prior to the start of grading activities.

    Topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled along the right-of-way from either the full work area or the ditch

    plus spoil area through agricultural lands. The topsoil will remain segregated to prevent mixing with the

    subsoil during construction activities. Topsoil may be replaced with appropriate imported material, as

    necessary.

    Trench Excavation

    A trench will be excavated to the appropriate depth to allow for the burial of the pipe with a minimum of

    three feet of cover as required by 49 CFR Part 192 of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s

    (“USDOT”) regulations. The trench will be dug with an excavator or ditching machine and the excavated

    material will be placed next to the trench within the construction right-of-way.

    If it becomes necessary to remove water from the trench, it will be pumped to a well-vegetated upland

    area (where practical) off the right-of-way and/or filtered through a filter bag or siltation barrier.

    Stringing

    Following excavation of the trench, stringing of the Pipeline along the trench will proceed. Stringing

    involves hauling the pipe sections to the right-of-way via truck from the pipe storage yard and then off-

    loading the pipe and placing the sections next to the trench using a sideboom tractor or vacuum hoe. The

    pipe joints will then be lined up end-to-end to allow for welding into continuous lengths known as strings.

    Bending

    Following stringing, the pipe sections will be bent as necessary so that they fit the horizontal and vertical

    contours. A Bending Engineer will survey the trench to determine the location and amount of each field

    bend and then the appropriate bends will be made with a hydraulic pipe-bending machine.

    Welding

    All welding will be performed in accordance with API Standard No. 1104. Individual pipe sections will

    be welded in two steps. A front-end welding crew will perform the first step, which will be to clean and

    align the pipe bevels in preparation for welding and to place at least the first two passes in the welding

    process. Back-end welders will perform the second step, which will be to complete the welds started by

    the front-end welders. The pipe will be welded into long strings to minimize the number of welds that

    have to be made in the trench (tie-in welds). Gaps in the welding process will often be left at

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-23 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    waterbody/wetland crossings, road crossings, and other locations where access across the work area is

    required. Automatic welding may be used on the Project.

    Nondestructive Weld Inspection

    Following welding, each weld will be inspected to ensure the structural integrity is consistent with

    49 CFR Part 192 of the USDOT’s regulations. Radiographs or ultrasonic images will be taken and

    processed on site for real-time results and those welds that do not meet the requirements established by

    the API Standard 1104 will be marked for repair or replacement.

    Weld Repair

    The construction contractor may have a separate weld repair crew to follow the welding inspection crew

    to make any necessary weld repairs. All repaired and replaced welds will be inspected to ensure proper

    repair and integrity.

    Coating Inspection and Repair

    The pipe lengths will be coated (usually with a heat-applied epoxy) at a coating mill prior to being

    delivered to the Project. The ends of each pipe section will be left bare to allow for welding. After welds

    have been inspected and approved, the weld areas will be field coated by a coating crew. The pipe coating

    will be inspected using equipment that emits an electrical charge, since pipeline coatings are electrically

    insulating.

    Lowering-In

    Once the pipe string has been welded, coated, and inspected, the trench will be cleared of any debris and

    any water will be pumped out of the trench and into a well-vegetated upland area and/or into an approved

    filter bag. The pipe strings will be lowered in with sideboom tractors.

    Tie-Ins

    Once the pipe strings have been lowered-in, a tie-in crew will make the final welds in the trench. The

    ends of each pipe string will be welded together, inspected, and coated.

    Backfilling

    All suitable material excavated from the trench will be replaced during backfilling. In areas where

    excavated material is unsuitable for backfilling, additional fill may be brought in from off-site. The

    subsoil will be placed into the trench first and then the topsoil will be spread over top. The top of the

    trench may be slightly crowned, except in wetlands, to compensate for potential settling. The soil will be

    inspected for compaction and scarified as necessary.

    Cleaning

    Following the completion of the Stage 3 Pipeline tie-ins, the Stage 3 Pipeline will be internally cleaned

    with “pigs.” A manifold will be installed on one end of a long pipeline section and pigs will be propelled

    by compressed air through the Pipeline and into an open pig catcher. The pigs will remove any dirt, water,

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-24 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    or debris that inadvertently collected within the Pipeline during the construction process. Collections from

    the pipeline produced by the cleaning procedure will be properly disposed.

    Hydrostatic Testing

    Following cleaning, the Stage 3 Pipeline will be pressure tested to ensure its integrity for the intended

    service and operating pressure. Water will be used to hydrostatically test the Stage 3 Pipeline and the

    water is normally obtained from water sources crossed by the Stage 3 Pipeline, including available

    municipal supply lines. The water will be pumped from the water source into the Stage 3 Pipeline and

    will propel a pig through the Stage 3 Pipeline in a manner that fills the Stage 3 Pipeline with water. A

    high pressure pump will be used to add water to the test section and to increase the test pressure. At the

    completion of the hydrostatic test, the pressure will be removed from the test section by propelling the pig

    with air and dewatering the pipe. Additional “drying” pig runs will be made, as necessary, to remove any

    residual water from the Pipeline.

    Restoration and Revegetation

    A cleanup crew will complete the restoration and revegetation of the right-of-way and temporary

    construction workspace. Every effort will be made, weather and soil conditions permitting, to complete

    final cleanup and installation of permanent erosion control measures within 20 days after the trench is

    backfilled. The right-of-way will be fine-graded to prepare for restoration. If needed, permanent slope

    breakers or diversion berms will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the Plan and

    Procedures. Fences will be restored or repaired as necessary.

    Revegetation will be completed in accordance with the permit requirements and any written

    recommendations on seeding mixes, rates, and dates obtained from the local soil conservation district

    and/or resource agencies. The right-of-way will be seeded within six working days following final

    grading, weather and soil conditions permitting, or according to recommendations from the local soil

    conservation district. Alternative seed mixes specifically requested by a landowner may be used.

    1.7.2.2 Waterbody Construction Methods

    To minimize potential impacts, waterbodies will be crossed in accordance with the FERC’s Procedures

    and the crossings will be completed as quickly and safely as possible. Initial evaluation has identified that

    some areas may be crossed by horizontal directional drill (“HDD”) (see Section 1.7.2.3); however,

    waterbodies will generally be crossed using conventional excavator-type equipment and wet-crossing

    techniques, or by horizontal bore. Upland and agricultural swales, ditches, and other such conveyances

    will be crossed using either a wet-crossing technique if water is flowing at the time of crossing or best

    management practices as determined by the EI if there is no flow at the time of crossing. Proposed

    waterbody crossing methods will be described in Resource Report 2.

    Except where reasonable alternative access is available, temporary construction equipment crossings will

    be installed across waterbodies to gain access along the right-of-way for construction. After equipment

    crossings are established, construction equipment will not be permitted to drive through a waterbody for

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-25 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    access and the equipment crossings will be removed once access in the area is no longer needed. Only the

    equipment necessary to construct the crossing and install the pipe will be allowed to work in the

    waterbody.

    To facilitate pipeline construction across waterbodies, ATWS may be needed adjacent to waterbodies to

    assemble and fabricate the pipe necessary to complete the crossings. The ATWS will be located at least

    50 feet away from the waterbody, except in actively cultivated or rotated croplands or other disturbed

    areas. In areas where the ATWS is required to be set back from the waterbody, vegetation will not be

    cleared between the ATWS area and the waterbody.

    Following installation, a minimum of three feet of cover will be placed over the Stage 3 Pipeline.

    Waterbody bed and bank contours will be restored to pre-construction conditions and the banks will be

    stabilized as soon as possible following construction activities. Permanent erosion control structures will

    be installed in accordance with the FERC Plan and Procedures, and temporary erosion control measures

    will be maintained to minimize erosion. Following construction, waterbody crossings will be inspected

    regularly to ensure that temporary erosion controls are functioning properly and that revegetation is

    progressing satisfactorily.

    1.7.2.3 Horizontal Directional Drill

    HDD is a pipeline construction method that avoids or minimizes impact to the ground surface by drilling

    a hole and pulling the pipeline through it rather than digging a trench. HDD requires the drilling of a

    small diameter hole, or pilot hole, along a predetermined design path that originates and terminates on the

    surface. The pilot hole is then enlarged sufficiently to accommodate the pipeline to be installed. The

    pipeline may or may not be installed concurrently with the hole enlargement depending upon the final

    diameter of the enlarged hole and the soil conditions encountered. Because the entry and exit angles are

    relatively shallow, HDD pipe installations are relatively long and expensive compared to conventional

    boring.

    CCPL is currently evaluating the use of HDD methodology and information on this evaluation will be

    provided in a subsequent version of Resource Report 1.

    1.7.2.4 Rugged Topography

    No areas of rugged topography will be crossed by the Stage 3 Pipeline. The topography of the Project

    area consists of coastal plains.

    1.7.2.5 Residential Areas

    There are no residences within 50 feet of the construction work area.

    1.7.2.6 Active Cropland

    In accordance with the FERC Plan, topsoil will be segregated in actively cultivated or rotated agricultural

    lands, pastures, and hayfields, unless otherwise approved in writing from the landowner prior to the

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-26 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    commencement of grading activities. After the Stage 3 Pipeline has been lowered into the ditch, the

    subsoil will be used for backfilling and the topsoil will then be spread across the graded right-of-way. The

    Stage 3 Pipeline will be installed with a minimum of three feet of soil cover. In active cropland areas the

    depth of cover will be a minimum of four feet. Soil compaction will be treated, as necessary, in

    accordance with FERC’s Plan.

    Prior to construction, CCPL will work with the affected landowners to identify any drain tiles within the

    construction workspace. Any drain tiles damaged during construction will be repaired to landowner

    specifications or to pre-construction condition. At this time, CCPL is not aware of any existing drain tiles

    along the proposed Pipeline route.

    1.7.2.7 Road Crossings

    All road crossings will be open-cut, bored, or installed by HDD, depending upon site-specific conditions

    and state and local statutes. Prior to construction, the “Call Before You Dig” or “One Call” system will be

    contacted to verify and mark all utilities along the Project workspace areas. Where there is a question as

    to the location of utilities, such as, water, cable, gas, and sewer lines, they will be located by field

    instrumentation and test pits.

    Generally, boring will be required under paved roadways. Boring entails drilling a hole below the

    roadways through which the pipe will pass. First, a bore pit is dug on one side of the roadway and a

    receiving pit dug on the other. The bore pit is excavated to a depth equal to the depth of the ditch and is

    graded such that the bore will follow the grade of the pipe. A boring machine is lowered to the bottom of

    the bore pit and placed on supports. The machine cuts a shaft under the roadway or canal using a cutting

    head mounted on an auger. The auger rotates in a casing, both of which are pushed forward as the hole is

    cut. The pipeline is then pushed through the casing.

    During the open-cut method of roadway crossing, at least one lane of traffic is typically kept open when

    constructing on or across residential streets. During the brief period when a road is completely cut, steel

    plates will be available on-site to cover the trench to permit travel by emergency vehicles. Traffic lanes

    and home access will be maintained except for the temporary periods essential for installing the Stage 3

    Pipeline.

    1.7.2.8 Blasting

    No blasting is anticipated for construction of the Stage 3 Pipeline facilities.

    1.8 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

    1.8.1 Stage 3 Project LNG Facilities

    All permanent personnel will be trained in LNG safety, cryogenic operations, and the proper operation of

    all equipment. Operators will meet all the training requirements of the USDOT minimum federal safety

    standards specified in 49 CFR Parts 192 and 193. Safety procedures will be discussed further in Resource

    Report 11.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-27 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    Operating procedures will be the same as those developed for the Liquefaction Project. Extensive training

    will be provided for operational personnel to ensure that they are familiar with and understand the

    importance of adherence to safe procedures. These procedures will provide functional requirements for

    the control and safeguarding systems, to include addressing safe start-up, normal shutdowns, emergency

    shutdowns, fire, gas and spills, etc., as well as routine operation and monitoring.

    A security guardhouse will be located at the facility entrance and continuously staffed 24-hours a day,

    seven days a week.

    Facility maintenance will be conducted in accordance with 49 CFR Part 193, Subpart G. The full-time

    plant maintenance staff will conduct routine maintenance and minor overhauls. Major overhauls and other

    major maintenance will be handled by soliciting the services of trained contract personnel to perform the

    maintenance. All scheduled and unscheduled maintenance will be entered into a computerized

    maintenance management system (“CMMS”). All personnel, operations, maintenance, and others will be

    trained on the use of CMMS. The CMMS will print out work orders every morning. These work orders

    will be distributed to the maintenance personnel during morning meetings.

    Scheduled maintenance, such as preventive and predictive maintenance of equipment, will be input into

    the system to automatically print out work orders either on a time basis or on hours of operation,

    depending on the requirement. Scheduled maintenance will be performed on safety and environmental

    equipment, instrumentation, and any other equipment that requires maintenance on a routine basis. When

    a problem is detected that requires unscheduled maintenance attention, the person that detects the problem

    will enter it into the CMMS. If a problem requires immediate attention, the appropriate person will be

    notified.

    The normal flow of maintenance orders will be as follows:

    Scheduled preventative and predictive maintenance will be input to the CMMS upon installation

    of each piece of equipment and once placed in-service;

    Unscheduled maintenance will be input to the CMMS when a problem is detected;

    CMMS will print out work orders every morning;

    The work orders will be distributed to the appropriate maintenance personnel in their morning

    meetings; and

    The person that completes the maintenance work will close out the work order on the CMMS.

    1.8.2 Pipeline

    CCPL will operate and maintain the proposed facilities in accordance with the applicable safety standards

    established by the USDOT (49 CFR Part 192). The standards imposed are in accordance with the Natural

    Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-28 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    The Stage 3 Pipeline will be patrolled on a routine basis, and personnel well qualified to perform both

    emergency and routine maintenance on interstate natural gas pipeline facilities will handle all

    maintenance.

    The proposed facilities will be operated and maintained in a manner such that pipeline integrity is

    maintained in the interest of assuring that a safe, continuous supply of natural gas reaches its ultimate

    destination. Maintenance activities will include regularly scheduled gas leak surveys and measures

    necessary to repair any potential leaks. The latter may include repair or replacement of pipe segments. All

    fence posts, signs, marker posts, aerial markers, and decals will be painted or replaced to ensure that the

    pipeline locations will be visible from the air and ground. All valves will be periodically inspected and

    greased.

    The Stage 3 Pipeline will be patrolled from the air on a periodic basis. This will provide information on

    possible leaks, construction activities, erosion, exposed pipe, population density, possible encroachment

    and other potential problems that may affect the safety and operation of the Stage 3 Pipeline.

    Other maintenance functions will include: (1) periodic seasonal mowing of the permanent easement in

    accordance with the vegetative maintenance restrictions outlined in the FERC’s Plan and Procedures,

    (2) terrace repair, backfill replacement, and (3) periodic inspection of water crossings. During pipeline

    easement maintenance, CCPL will not use herbicides or pesticides within 100 feet of a wetland or

    waterbody unless approved by appropriate state and local agencies.

    Cathodic protection units installed along the pipeline will be regularly monitored to maintain required

    pipe-to-soil potential. This will be achieved in accordance with the specifications set forth by CCPL that

    meet or exceed USDOT regulations.

    1.9 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT

    1.9.1 Future Plans

    CCL and CCPL have no plans for further expansion beyond the Project. To the extent that consideration

    for expansion of the facilities becomes warranted in response to additional demand for liquefaction or

    vaporization services, any new facilities would be designed to be compatible with the proposed facilities

    and all necessary permits and approvals would be obtained for those new facilities.

    1.9.2 Abandonment of Facilities

    No facilities are proposed for abandonment or removal at this time.

    1.10 PERMITS AND APPROVALS

    CCL and CCPL will obtain all necessary permits, clearances, and licenses relating to the construction and

    operation of the Project. Table 1.10-1 provides a list of permits that CCL and CCPL will obtain for the

    Project. CCL and CCPL will file any additional correspondence and approvals with the FERC upon

    receipt.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-29 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    CCL and CCPL will include copies of all relevant environmental permits and approvals in the

    construction bid packages and contracts. Construction contractor(s) employed on the Project will be

    required to be familiar with all Project permits and licenses and comply with all federal, state, and local

    laws, ordinances, and regulations that apply to construction of the facility and to restoration of any areas

    temporarily disturbed during construction. Should other safety, design, and construction codes and

    regulations be enacted or adopted by governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the locations where

    the work is to be performed, the contractor(s) will be required to observe and abide by all provisions that

    are applicable.

    TABLE 1.10-1

    Permits and Consultations for the Stage 3 Project

    Agency and Agency Contact

    Permit/Approval/Consultation Anticipated Submittal

    Anticipated Receipt

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

    Section 7 Endangered Species Act Consultation/Clearance; Migratory bird consultation; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act

    Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    4th

    Quarter 2015

    USACE Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Amendment January 2016 3rd

    Quarter 2016

    NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat; Endangered Species Act Aquatic Threatened and Endangered Species; Marine Mammal Protection Act; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act

    Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    4th

    Quarter 2015

    USCG Waterway Suitability Assessment Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    1st Quarter 2016

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    NPDES Industrial Water Discharge; Hydrostatic Test Water Discharge

    January 2016 3rd

    Quarter 2016

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Authorization to Export LNG Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    1st Quarter 2016 for FTA nations; 2

    nd

    Quarter 2017 for non-FTA

    nations

    Federal Aviation Administration

    Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation (14 CFR Part 77)

    January 2016 April 2016

    Railroad Commission of Texas

    Water Quality Certification under Section 401; Hydrostatic Test Water Discharge Permit; Coastal Zone Consistency Determination

    January 2016 3rd

    Quarter 2016

    Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

    Air Permits for CCL Terminal (Title V & PSD) and Sinton Compressor Station (minor permit)

    November 2015

    3rd

    Quarter 2016

    Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

    State threatened and endangered species review Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    4th

    Quarter 2015

    Texas Historical Commission

    Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Consultation, Clearance

    Initiated 2nd

    Quarter 2015

    4th

    Quarter 2015

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-30 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    1.11 AFFECTED LANDOWNERS

    There are six landowners adjacent to, and within 0.5 mile of, the proposed Stage 3 Liquefaction Facilities,

    all of which are commercial and/or industrial facilities: Port of Corpus Christi Authority (“POCCA”),

    Sherwin Alumina, Voestalpine Texas, Bradleys, Inc., TPCO America, and Alcoa. There are numerous

    other landowners directly crossed by and adjacent to the proposed Stage 3 Pipeline and within 0.5 mile of

    the Sinton Compressor Station site. Names and addresses of these landowners are provided in Appendix

    1B, as required in 18 CFR §157.6(d) of the FERC’s regulations. Further, in accordance with 18 CFR

    §157.21(f) (3) and 18 CFR §157.6(d) (2), CCL and CCPL have contacted each of these entities and

    individuals regarding the Project.

    1.12 NONJURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES

    1.12.1 Identified Nonjurisdictional Facilities

    Terminal

    An electrical power line will be installed between a substation currently being constructed by American

    Electric Power (“AEP”) (approximately 500 feet to the west of the Stage 3 LNG Facilities) and the

    proposed Stage 3 LNG Facilities. Coordination with AEP regarding installation of the new power line is

    ongoing. Additional detail regarding the installation of this project feature will be provided in a

    subsequent version of Resource Report 1.

    A water line will be installed to the by the San Patricio County Municipal Water District to the Stage 3

    LNG Facilities. The water line will be designed, built, owned, and operated by the San Patricio County

    Municipal Water District and CCL will not determine the route or location of the water line.

    Pipeline

    High voltage power lines are located approximately 500 feet to the northwest of the Sinton Compressor

    Station. An electrical power line extension and a substation will be required for operation of the new

    electric-driven compression at the Sinton Compressor Station. CCPL is in discussions with AEP

    regarding bringing the necessary power to the Sinton Compressor Station. The power line and substation

    would be designed, built, owned, and operated by AEP.

    1.12.2 Determination of the Need for FERC to Conduct an Environmental Review

    Under certain circumstances, nonjurisdictional facilities may be subject to FERC’s environmental review.

    In making this determination, FERC requires applicants to address four factors that indicate the need for

    the FERC to do an environmental review of project-related nonjurisdictional facilities. These factors are:

    (1) Whether or not the regulated activity comprises “merely a link” in a corridor type project

    (such as a transportation or utility transmission project);

    (2) Whether there are aspects of the nonjurisdictional facility in the immediate vicinity of the

    regulated activity which affect the location and configuration of the regulated activity;

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-31 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    (3) The extent to which the entire project will be within FERC’s jurisdiction; and

    (4) The extent of cumulative federal control and responsibility.

    The application of this procedure to the nonjurisdictional facilities follows:

    With respect to factor (1), the regulated activities are not a corridor-type project or a link in a

    corridor type project. Therefore, this factor does not support a review of the nonjurisdictional

    facilities.

    With respect to factor (2), there are no aspects of the nonjurisdictional facilities that affect the

    location and configuration of the proposed Stage 3 Project. Therefore, this factor does not support

    a review of the nonjurisdictional facilities.

    With respect to factor (3), the nonjurisdictional facilities are entirely outside of the FERC’s

    jurisdiction as the construction of these facilities is under the jurisdiction of the State of Texas

    regulatory agencies. This factor weighs against inclusion of the nonjurisdictional facility in a

    review by FERC.

    With respect to factor (4), the cumulative level of federal control and responsibility over the

    project, federal control is determined by the amount of federal financing, assistance, direction,

    regulation, or approval inherent in a project. The nonjurisdictional facilities will be developed by

    private entities, and no federal financing or guarantees will be granted for construction of these

    facilities. Some federal permits may be involved, but no federal lands are involved. Therefore,

    cumulative federal control is minimal and this factor does counsel FERC environmental review.

    1.13 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS

    The Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”) regulations that implement the National Environmental

    Policy Act define cumulative effects as “the impact on the environment which results from the

    incremental consequences of an action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable

    future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions” (40 CFR 1508.7).

    Cumulative effects include both direct and indirect effects that would result from the proposed Project, as

    well as the effects from other projects (past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions) not

    related to or caused by the Project. Cumulative impacts may result when the environmental effects

    associated with a proposed Project are added to temporary (construction-related) or permanent

    (operations-related) impacts associated with other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects.

    Although the individual impact of each separate project might not be significant, the additive or

    synergistic effects of multiple projects could be significant. The cumulative effects analysis evaluates the

    magnitude of cumulative effects on natural resources such as wetlands, water quality, floodplains, and

    threatened and endangered species, as well as cumulative effects on land use, socioeconomics, air quality,

    noise, and cultural resources. CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.8) also require that the cumulative effects

    analysis consider the indirect effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther

    removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable.

  • RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    STAGE 3 PROJECT

    Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC 1-32 July 2015

    Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.

    The purpose of the cumulative impacts analysis is to identify and describe cumulative impacts that would

    potentially result from implementation of the Project. Inclusion of actions within the analysis is based on

    identifying commonalities of impacts from other actions to potential impacts that would result from the

    Project. In order to avoid unnecessary discussions of insignificant impacts and projects and to adequately

    address and accomplish the purposes of this analysis, the cumulative impacts analysis for the proposed

    Project will be conducted using the following guidelines:

    A project must impact a resource category potentially affected by the proposed Project. For the

    most part, these projects are located in the same general area that would be directly affected by

    construction of the proposed Project. The effects of more distant projects are in most cases not

    assessed, because their impacts would tend to be localized and not contribute significantly to the

    impacts of the proposed project. Potential cumulative impacts on air quality and watersheds,

    however, were considered on a broader, more regional basis.

    The distance into the past and future which other projects could potentially cumulatively impact

    the area of the proposed Project was based on whether the impacts are short-term, long-term, or

    permanent. Most of the impacts related to the other proposed projects would occur during the

    construction phase, and would be short-term impacts. Timing will be evaluated based