corporation law reviewer

49
I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1. The Philippine Corporate Law When the Philippines came under American sovereignty, attention was drawn to the fact that there was no entity in Spanish law exactly corresponding to the notion “corporation” in English and American law; the Philippine Commission enacted the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459), to introduce the American corporation into the Philippines as the standard commercial entity and to hasten the day when the sociedad anónima of the Spanish law would be obsolete. The statute is a sort of codification of American Corporate Law. Harden v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co., 58 Phil. 141 (1933). 2. The Corporation Law The first corporate statute, the Corporation Law, or Act No. 1459, became effective on 1 April 1906. It had various piece-meal amendments during its 74 year history. It rapidly became antiquated and not adapted to the changing times. 3. The Corporation Code The present Corporation Code, or Batas Pambansa Blg. 68, became effective on 1 May 1980. It adopted various corporate doctrines enunciated by the Supreme Court under the old Corporation Law. It clarified the obligations of corporate directors and officers, expressed in statutory language established principles and doctrines, and provided for a chapter on close corporations. 4. Proper Treatment of Philippine Corporate Law Philippine Corporate Law comes from the common law system of the United States. Therefore, although we have a Corporation Code that provides for statutory principles, Corporate Law is essentially, and continues to be, the product of commercial developments. Much of this development can be expected to happen in the world of commerce, and some expressed jurisprudential rules that try to apply and adopt corporate principles into the changing concepts and mechanism of the commercial world. II. CONCEPTS See opening paragraphs of Villanueva, Corporate Contract Law,38 Ateneo L.J. 1 (No. 2, June 1994).

Upload: jim

Post on 18-Aug-2015

43 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

Corp Law Reviwer

TRANSCRIPT

I.HISTORICAL BACKGROUND1.The Philippine Corporate LawWhen the Philippine !a"e #n$er A"eri!an o%erei&nt'( attention wa $rawn to the )a!t that there wa no entit' in Spanih law e*a!tl' !orrepon$in& to the notion +!orporation, in -n&lih an$ A"eri!an law. the Philippine Co""iion ena!te$ the Corporation Law /A!t No. 10123( to intro$#!e the A"eri!an !orporation into the Philippine a the tan$ar$ !o""er!ial entit' an$ to haten the $a' when the o!ie$a$ an4ni"a o) the Spanih law wo#l$ 5e o5olete. The tat#te i a ort o) !o$i6!ation o) A"eri!an Corporate Law.Har$en %. Benet Conoli$ate$ 7inin& Co.( 18 Phil. 101 /12993.:.The Corporation LawThe 6rt !orporate tat#te( the Corporation Law( or A!t No. 1012( 5e!a"e e;e!ti%e on 1 April 12"eal a"en$"ent $#rin& it ?0 'ear hitor'. It rapi$l' 5e!a"e anti@#ate$ an$ not a$apte$ to the !han&in& ti"e.9.The Corporation Co$eThe preent Corporation Co$e( or Bata Pa"5ana Bl&. =8( 5e!a"e e;e!ti%e on 1 7a' 128!orporation relationhip/53 Contra!t#al Relationhip Le%el( whi!h !oni$er that the !orporate ettin& i at on!e a !ontra!t#al relationhip on )o#r /03 le%elE>Between the !orporation an$ it a&ent or repreentati%e to a!t in the real worl$( #!h a it $ire!tor an$ it oA!er( whi!h i &o%erne$ alo 5' the Law on A&en!'.>Between the !orporation an$ it harehol$er or "e"5er.>Between an$ a"on& the harehol$er in a !o""on %ent#re. an$>Between the !orporation an$ thir$>partie or +o#ti$er,( whi!h i eentiall' &o%erne$ 5' Contra!t Law.0.Theorie on Ior"ation o) CorporationE/a3 Theor' o) Con!eion /Ta'a& %. Benet Conoli$ate$ In!.( := SCRA :0: G12=8H3To or&aniFe a !orporation that !o#l$ !lai" a B#ri$i!al peronalit' o) it own an$ trana!t 5#ine a #!h( i not a "atter o) a5ol#te ri&ht 5#t a pri%ile&e whi!h "a' 5e enBo'e$ onl'#n$er #!h ter" a the State "a' $ee" ne!ear' to i"poe /*>!).An& P#e J Co. %. Se!. o) Co""er!e an$ In$#tr'( 1 SCRA =01 G12=:H3.Be)ore a !orporation "a' a!@#ire B#ri$i!al peronalit'( the State "#t &i%e it !onent eitherin the )or" o) a pe!ial law or a &eneral ena5lin& a!t( an$ the pro!e$#re an$ !on$ition pro%i$e$ #n$er the law )or the a!@#iition o) #!h B#ri$i!al peronalit' "#t 5e !o"plie$ with. The )ail#re to !o"pl' with the tat#tor' pro!e$#re an$ !on$ition $oe not warrant a 6n$in& that #!h ao!iation a!hie%e$ the a!@#iition o) a eparate B#ri$i!al peronalit'( e%en when it a$opt et o) !ontit#tion an$ 5'>law. *International -*pre Tra%el J To#r Ser%i!e( In!. %. Co#rt o) Appeal( 909 SCRA =?0 /:$epen$en!e on the li%e o) thoe who !o"poe it e%en a it enBo' !ertain ri&ht an$ !on$#!t a!ti%itie o) nat#ral peron.Re'noo( IC %. Co#rt o) Appeal(G.R. No. 11=1:0>:1( :: No%e"5er :