corporation case 102

2
Philippine Trust Co. vs. Rivera G.R. No. L-19761; January 29, 1923 FACTS: Cooperative Naval Filipinas was incorporated under the Philippine laws. Mariano Rivera was one of the incorporators. The AOI were registered in the Bureau of Commerce and Industry. In the course of time, the corporation became insolvent and went into the hands of Phil. Trust Co., as assignee in bankruptcy. The latter instituted an action to recover unpaid stock subscription of defendant. Defendant insists the resolution that has been made on the reduction of the capital, the reason why he did not fully pay the entire subscription. ISSUE: WON the reduction of the corporate capital by releasing the subscribers from payment of their subscription is valid and proper. HELD: It is established doctrine that subscription to the capital of a corporation constitute a find to which creditors have a right to look for satisfaction of their claims and that the assignee in insolvency can maintain an action upon any unpaid stock subscription in order to realize assets for the payment of its debts. (Velasco vs. Poizat, 37 Phil., 802.) A corporation has no power to release an original subscriber to its capital stock from the obligation of paying for his shares, without a valuable consideration for such release; and as against creditors a reduction of the capital stock can take place only in the manner

Upload: daregumacal

Post on 13-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

reviewer

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporation Case 102

Philippine Trust Co. vs. RiveraG.R. No. L-19761; January 29, 1923

FACTS:Cooperative Naval Filipinas was incorporated under the Philippine laws.

Mariano Rivera was one of the incorporators. The AOI were registered in the Bureau of Commerce and Industry. In the course of time, the corporation became insolvent and went into the hands of Phil. Trust Co., as assignee in bankruptcy. The latter instituted an action to recover unpaid stock subscription of defendant. Defendant insists the resolution that has been made on the reduction of the capital, the reason why he did not fully pay the entire subscription.

ISSUE:WON the reduction of the corporate capital by releasing the subscribers

from payment of their subscription is valid and proper.

HELD:It is established doctrine that subscription to the capital of a corporation

constitute a find to which creditors have a right to look for satisfaction of their claims and that the assignee in insolvency can maintain an action upon any unpaid stock subscription in order to realize assets for the payment of its debts. (Velasco vs. Poizat, 37 Phil., 802.) A corporation has no power to release an original subscriber to its capital stock from the obligation of paying for his shares, without a valuable consideration for such release; and as against creditors a reduction of the capital stock can take place only in the manner an under the conditions prescribed by the statute or the charter or the articles of incorporation. Moreover, strict compliance with the statutory regulations is necessary

In the case at bar, therefore held that the resolution relied upon the defendant was without effect and that the defendant was still liable for the unpaid balance of his subscription.