corporate presentation november, 2005 · corporate structure • spin out of non-diamond rights...

34
TSX:KAM Corporate Presentation November, 2005

Upload: others

Post on 17-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

TSX:KAM

Corporate Presentation November, 2005

Page 2: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Introducing Kaminak Gold Corporation

A new precious / base metal exploration company formed by combining the non-diamond rights from several properties owned bythe Hunter Exploration Group with gold properties owned by ShearMinerals Ltd.

Kaminak Gold Corporation will have complete and free access toproprietary data accumulated through previous diamond explorationprograms on these properties, including over 71,000 line kilometers of airborne geophysics, 7,500 archived till samples, satellite imageryand GIS compilations.

Page 3: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Corporate Structure• Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and

acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond assets

• SRM shareholders receive one share of Kaminak for every 5 sharesof SRM

• Financing for $1.45 Million, including $1.16 Million hard dollars priced at $0.25 per share and $285K flow-thru dollars priced at $0.35

• 19,702,070 shares outstanding fully-diluted (post-financing).

• Largest share holder is Hunter Exploration Group (3,000,000 units)

• Teck-Cominco Limited participation in financing

Page 4: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Share Structure

Shares Issued: 19,702,073Fully Diluted: 23,757,073Working Capital: $800,000.00Fully Diluted Working Capital: $3,000,00.00Long Term Debt: NIL

Warrants Outstanding: (Exp. 11/07) 3,000,000 @ $0.35 Options Outstanding: (Exp. 11/07) 157,800 @ $0.35

***(Exp. 11/07) 897,200 @ $1.00 or $1.25

***Priced @ $1.00 in 1st year and @ $1.25 in 2nd year.

Page 5: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

A Distinct Advantage

• One of the largest land position in Canada for precious and basemetal exploration, including uranium (>15,000,000 acres).

• 10 projects capable of hosting “world class” mineral districts

• Leveraged exploration

• Access to capital

• Track record of success

Page 6: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

A Unique Opportunity

• Acquisition of high quality data covering prospective gold, basemetal and uranium regions of Canada through innovative exploration agreements.

• Total of >$23,000,000 in third party expenditures

Page 7: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Management

• John Robins, P.Geo. President and Director

• Rob Carpenter, Ph.D., P.Geo. VP Exploration and Director

• John Williamson, P. Geol. CFO and Director

• Pamela Strand, M.Sc., P.Geol. Director

• Gerald Proselindis, Director

Page 8: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Exploration Strategy

• Joint venture philosophy

• Focus on strategic commodities (gold, nickel, uranium)

• Continue use of leveraged exploration agreements

• 2005 third party exploration expenditures of over $8,000,000

• Minimize our own expenditure commitments

Page 9: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Properties

Page 10: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Eastern Arctic Properties

Page 11: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Churchill Property

Page 12: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Churchill Property

Page 13: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Churchill Property

• Largest land package devoted to gold and base metal exploration in Canada (>8.5 million acres).

• Target deposit types include: Au, Ni-Cu-PGE, Olympic Dam Cu-Au-Fe-oxide and Unconformity Uranium.

• Complete free access to data generated by ongoing diamond exploration including, 71,000 line km of Mag/EM, satellite imagery, GIS datasets and 9,300 archival till samples.

• Known occurrences on ground include, Happy Lake (Au), Amarok (Au), MQ claims (Au) and Baker (U-Cu).

Page 14: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Churchill Property

New airborne magnetics

Still to come…. 75m spaced airborne EM

New till data

Page 15: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Copper-Gold-Uranium Potential (IOCG)

Page 16: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Copper-Gold-Uranium Potential (IOCG)

Page 17: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Copper-Gold-Uranium Potential (IOCG)

• Over 20 Uranium-Copper-Gold occurrences documented by Pan Ocean Oil (1969-1976) and Noranda Ltd (1978-1984).

• Many geological similarities with the Beaverlodge Uranium District, located on the north rim of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan. The Beaverlodge District produced over 31,000,000 kg’s of uranium from 1949 to 1982.

• The overall geological setting suggests a favourable environment for the discovery of Iron-oxide-copper-gold deposits (IOCG). These criteria include; diatreme breccia hosted Cu-Au-U mineralization, presence of continental alkaline volcanic rocks, and pervasive hematite alteration zones.

Page 18: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Matrix and Sy Properties

Page 19: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Matrix and Sy Properties

Page 20: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Matrix Property

• Newmont Mining Corp can earn up to 70% interest by spending $14 million in exploration. Target is “Witwatersrand-type” gold mineralization.

• 2004 work program consisted of prospecting as well as tracing gold zones along strike and at depth using magnetics, radiometrics, electromagnetics and induced polarization.

• Expanded 2005 work program completed by Newmont.

Page 21: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Matrix Property

Page 22: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

SY Property• 100% interest in minerals for core part of property (120,000 acres) and 50%

interest in minerals from peripheral portions of property (160,000 acres). Diamonds North Resources owns remaining 50% interest.

• 1985-1987 explored by Homestake Development Corp. for BIF and non-BIF hosted gold targets. Over 50 km of favourable structures on property.

• Homestake identified showings with up to 43.8 g/t Au and drilled several outcropping showings, however only 1% of belt is exposed.

• Shares many geological similarities to Meliadine gold district (>5.0 Moz. Au)

• Project will benefit from data generated by ongoing diamond exploration, namely regional till sampling and airborne magnetic surveys.

Page 23: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Sy Property

Mineralized BIF subcrop

Highly deformed BIF

Page 24: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

IME Properties

Page 25: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

IME Properties

Page 26: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

IME Properties

• 100% non-diamond rights to >2 million acres of completely unexploredArchean and Proterozoic rocks.

• Free access to any data collected during the course of diamond exploration, including airborne geophysics and archived till samples.

• Target commodities include Au, Ni-Cu-PGE and U.

• 750 tills collected in 2005 (3km square grid) and 850 tills collected in 2004

Page 27: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

North Slave Properties

Page 28: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

North Slave Properties

Page 29: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

North Slave Properties

Page 30: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Lach Property

• 100% interest of 110,000 acres straddling the Bathurst Fault Zone (>500km strike length). Fault zones separate Archean sedimentary rocks from Proterozoic rocks.

• Previous mapping by DIAND and Hunter Exploration recognized the gold potential of this fault and it’s associated splays. Assays up to 143.0 g/t Auobtained with significant Cu, Ag, Zn, Bi, Pb, Ni, Co associated with fault parallel quartz – carbonate veins.

• Cogema Resources (1991-1993) reported that 110 of 650 samples assayed >1.0 g/t Au with a high of 76.7 g/t Au. Three drill holes (439.9m) returned 0.83 g/t Au over 3.5m).

• 2005 prospecting resulted in the discovery of the Gela Lake gold Zone.

Page 31: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Lach Property

Page 32: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Bathurst, Needle, BR Properties

• BIF hosted gold prospects strategically located near the proposed Bathurst Inlet Road and Port Project. Similar examples include, Lupin, George Lake and Goose Lake.

• Bathurst Property: 15 known gold showings with highest grab sample assaying 167.8 g/t Au. Best drill result is 9.12 g/t Au over 2.85m.

• Needle Property: Best drill intersections include, 9.46 g/t Au over 3.43m and 11.58 g/t Au over 2.02m and 3.42 g/t Au over 8.9m.

• BR Property: Grab samples up to 16.0 g/t Au and chip samples up to 3.4 g/tAu over 3m. Over 30km of strike potential in BIF and sheared volcanic rocks.

Page 33: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Voigtberg Property, Northern B.C.

• Large gold in soil anomaly 300m by 300m

• Average gold grade from three holes (498 feet each) was 0.278 g/t Au, 0.293 g/tAu and 0.218 g/t Aurespectively. The final 8 feet of the third hole intersected a high level intrusive porphyry and yielded 2.01 g/tAu. No follow-up drilling was done

• Chargeability anomaly never tested

Page 34: Corporate Presentation November, 2005 · Corporate Structure • Spin out of non-diamond rights from Shear Minerals Ltd. and acquisition of Hunter Exploration Group’s non-diamond

Nizi Property, Northern B.C.

• Large100% owned High-grade epithermal vein hosted prospect, 80 km northeast of Dease Lake B.C. Sampling in 1971 returned values of 1.2 oz/t Au and 22.3 oz/t Ag over 1.5 meters.

• Work in the early 1990’s by Gold Fields resulted in the discovery of quartz veins 1-2 meters wide that can persist for several hundred meters. Drill results of 5.68 g/t Au over 13.77m and 27.09 g/t Au plus 1220.6 g/t Ag over 2.0m.