corporate governance in thailand: glancing behind and looking forward
DESCRIPTION
Corporate Governance in Thailand: Glancing Behind and Looking Forward. “CG Development in Thailand: The Three Disciplines” September 13, 2006 Deunden Nikomborirak Thailand Development Research Institute. Outline of presentation. 1. The face of Thai corporate governance ownership structure - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
04/19/23
Corporate Governance in Thailand: Glancing Behind and Looking Forward
“CG Development in Thailand: The Three Disciplines”September 13, 2006
Deunden NikomborirakThailand Development Research Institute
04/19/23
Outline of presentation
1. The face of Thai corporate governance– ownership structure– corporate conduct– governance performance
2.State and private sector initiatives in promoting good governance: the 3 disciplines
3. Economic, political and Social Challenges
4. Conclusions
04/19/23
1. The Face of Thai Corporate Structure & Governance
04/19/23
Ownership Structure
Concentrated ownership family-control was prominent particularly in
finance and securities and property family-control declined in banking, finance and
securities and property foreign bank’s share increased in both banking
and finance
04/19/23
Corporate practices
Most common abuses were connected lending, connected transactions (siphoning of corporate funds).
More recent abuses: insider trading and share prices manipulations through custodian ot nominee accounts. According to Achavanuntakul (2006), 21.4% of total SET market capitalization is accounted for by nominees.
04/19/23
Doing Business in Thailand (2006) by The World Bank
10
5.2 6.3
2
4.45
6 6.16.6 65.26
0
2
4
6
8
10
Disclosure Director Liability Shareholder Suits Investor Protection
Thailand
Regional
OECD
04/19/23
Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed
Companiesby Thai Institute of
Directors
65.8
74.5 68.883.1
53.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rights ofShareholders
EquitableTreatment ofShareholders
Role of Stakeholders
Disclosure andTransparency
BoardResponsibilities
04/19/23
2. Initiatives taken to promote
Good Corporate Governance
04/19/23
3 pillars supporting corporate governance
Regulation (SEC/SET) Market discipline (SRI) Self-restraint ( firm-level
corporate conduct code)
04/19/23
Regulations Many legal loopholes exist (definition of connected
transactions, connected persons, definition of price manipulation, lack of regulatory authority to demand disclosure of UBOs)
legal procedures not conducive to prosecution (criminal sanctions only, reliance on police force for investigation and attorney for to file a lawsuit)
legal amendments in the pipeline. The SEC had resorted to preventive measures and
administrative sanctions.
04/19/23
Regulations
Examples of preventive measures for connected transactions : requirements for submission of transactions that received shareholders resolutions, review of connected transactions and auditors’ reports.
For illegal operation through nominees: “know your customer (KYC) & customer due diligence (CDD) requirement for brokers”
Example of administrative sanctions: fines and black-listing.
04/19/23
Regulations
Shortcomings of administrative measures: lack of transparency, social sanctions, market discipline, case precedence and prone to discriminatory treatment
04/19/23
Regulations
SET imposes many regulations governing disclosures and board structure -- i.e., audit committee, independent directors, governance assessment and shareholders’ resolution required for large connected transactions .
Shortcomings of SET measures: no clear penalties.
04/19/23
Market-discipline corporate governance rating (by TRIS) good governance awards, disclosure awards, popular awards. reduction in fees and compensation for rating fees.
– But too few companies participated. Establishment of Institutional Investor Club and Investor
Association.
– IIC still has no investment criteria and IA
lacks personnel to pursue governance work
04/19/23
Self-restraint Only a handful of Thai companies have governance
code. According to Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed Companies 2005”3/4 of surveyed listed companies explicitly mentioned
obligations to shareholders2/3 mentioned obligations to customers< 1/3 mention safety and welfare of employees1/5 mentioned environmental issues and compliance in
their public communications
04/19/23
3. Economic, political and Social Challenges
Lack of law enforcement means CSR does NOT pay (although
according to Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed Companies 2005 – firms with higher governance scores performed better)
Certain government policies inconsistent with good corporate governance (Foreign business Act, Minister’s Equity Share act,etc.)
Culture of patronage contribute to widespread use of nominees.
Major Obstacles to Business Growth
0 0 . 5 1 1 . 5 2 2 . 5 3 3 . 5
P r ic e u n d e r c u t
T a x a v o id a n c e
A c c e s s t o c r e d it
P r e d a t o r y p r ic in g b y M N C s
R e g u la t o r y A v o id a n c e
U n f a ir t r a d e p r a c t ic e
S u b s id ie s
A v o id la b o u r t a x e s / r e g u la t io n s
V io la t e c o p y r ig h t s
A Survey on Corruption and Bribery in the Business Sector : University of Thai Chamber of Commerce, 2000
04/19/23
Economic, political and Social Challenges
Limited long-term investment and active institutional investors means Socially Responsible Investment is RARE. (12% Institutional investor)
Lack of regulatory independence– government political agenda versus SEC’s
regulatory agenda – investigation in cases involving politicians or large
companies with strong political connections
04/19/23
Economic, political and Social Challenges
More recently, boycotting and social pressures, rather than SRI, are playing increasing role in fostering CSR .
04/19/23
4. Conclusion
Independence of regulatory body and legal amendments are crucial for effective law enforcement.
SEC’s authority should be broadened with respect to prosecution and identification of UBOs.
“soft measures” can go a long way in regulation and in promotion of self-discipline, but has limited bite.
Market-discipline requires (1) disclosures of corporate
misconduct and abuses and (2) SRI
04/19/23
4. Conclusion In the absence of market-discipline, the task will
inevitably fall heavily on SEC and SET. SRI to be spearheaded by large state pension and
investment funds. NGOs and civil society can play very important
roles in providing “social discipline” where regulatory oversight and SRI are absent or ineffective.
04/19/23
THANK YOU