corneal staining pure vision 10 persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens...

9
Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The Corneal staining was evaluated: 1. Before using the lens; 2. After 2 hours of lens use; 3. After for hours of lens use

Upload: marcus-cooper

Post on 13-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Corneal Staining

Pure Vision

10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to

corneal staining analysis.

The Corneal staining was evaluated:

1. Before using the lens;

2. After 2 hours of lens use;

3. After for hours of lens use

Page 2: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

We use an image analyzing software to obtain objective and quantitative results.

The following classification has been used

-Micropunctate : Area ≤ 0.002 mm2

-Macropunctate: 0.002 ≤ Area ≤ 0.01 mm2

-Coalescent macropunctate: 0.01 ≤ Area ≤ 0.3 mm2

-Patch: Area >0.3 mm2

The analysis has been carried out only on the zones (classified according to the five-zone method) with clinical relevance and not on the whole corneal

area.

CCLRU staining grading scale has been employed to classify the staining type

Page 3: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

19 Eyes didn’t present staining.

We observed staining only in one case.

Corneal Staining was in the zone 2 of the cornea and was classified as:

Type 2

Extension 1

Corneal Staining

Analysis 1

Page 4: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Corneal Staining

Analysis 2

After two hoursAfter 2 Hours

60,00% 40%No staining

Zone 5

The 60% of the subjects presents corneal

staining in the zone 5.

Type 3 (i.e. coalescent macropunctate)

dominates

After two hours

16,67% 16,67%16,67%

50,00%Type 1

Type 2

Type 3

Type 3/ 4

Page 5: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Corneal Staining

Analysis 2

After two hours

The extent according to our classification was 1-2

Extent grading scale (Lecce Proposal) 0 = absent (o < 1%)1 = from 1% to 3% surface involvement2 = from 3% to 10% surface involvement3 = from 10% to 30% surface involvement4 = >30 % surface involvement

After 2 hours

58,00%45,00% extent 1

extent 2

Page 6: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Examples

Page 7: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Corneal Staining

Analysis 3

After four hours

Staining severity decrease. Only in one case we can observe a

staining worsening

After 4 Hours

65,00%

10,00%

25,00%No stainingZone 5Cornea intera

After four hours

57%29%

14%

Type 1/2

Type 3

Type 3/4

After four hours

57%43%

extent 1

extent 3

Page 8: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The
Page 9: Corneal Staining Pure Vision 10 Persons (20 eyes) of the university staff (usual contact lens wearers) were subjected to corneal staining analysis. The

Conclusion

In our opinion there are NO interaction between the Pure Vision Lens and the solution (non so il nome) for the lens

care.

The staining investigated are probably due to the secchezza

(Dryness???) of the eyes caused by normal activity of the university staff (i.e. prolonged

use of the pc monitor).