corey templeton architecture portfolio
DESCRIPTION
Architecture Portfolio 2009-2012 M.Arch, University of OregonTRANSCRIPT
corey templeton | architectural portfolio
R. Corey TempletonM.Arch | University of Oregon 2012
Architecture has long been my passion, though it was not until a fortuitous opportunity that
I was able to exit my career in Information Technology to pursue design. My background in
troubleshooting and customer service, as well as my B.S. in Business Administration should
serve my future employer well. My drive to succeed can be seen in how much I have
accomplished in architecture school with two young children and an amazingly patient wife.
This portfolio is a look back at my work in the Masters of Architecture program at the
University of Oregon. I tried to pare down each project as to not overwhelm with information,
but still communicate my strengths, and get a glimpse into some of the skills I have acquired
through the process.COREYabout
>SCHOOL [the water and the woods]HEARTFLOWPARAMETRIC cortenSalem POLICE stationa nice [back alley] HOMENewport SEAFARER’S institute3 SANCTUARIES private residenceSTRUCTURAL modelingENCLOSURE detailing
010709111315171921CONTENTS
TABLE OF
PRO
CESS
WO
RK WATER // Situated between the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers, and with
70% low-grade wetland on the chosen site, water is a significant part of
Springfield citizens’ everyday lives. Surface rainwater runs through educa-
tional and functional bio-swales to rehabilitated wetlands at the lowest 15%
of the site approaching the main entry.
WOOD // With Springfield’s long history in the lumber industry, and the
site’s adjacent Weyerhaeuser lumber haul-road, local red-pine becomes a
prime material for the character of the school on the edge of town. The east
half of the site is enlivened with both deciduous and coniferous trees to
create a sense of enclosure.
SITE // Accommodating approximately 600 students from Kindergarten
through the 8th grade, this is a model of a school that serves the commu-
nity as well as the students. Sports fields reside at the flattest part of the site,
while the school sits at the southern edge, protecting the playground from
winter winds, as it addresses the residential neighborhood to the north.
WATER AND THE WOOD [LOCAL SIGNATURE]
SPRINGFIELD, OREGONFIGURE GROUND MAP
Sustainable Cities Initiative | K-8 School in Springfield, Oregon
Terminal Architecture Studio
GRADE DIVISION @ CENTRAL SOCIAL HUB
elementary
elementary
jr. high
kindergarten
CIRCULATION
athletics
fields
parking
playground
wetlandparking bus & parent
drop-offNATURAL SURVEILLANCESITE VIEWS
hillside
hillside
Mt. Pisgah valley
site
plan
MAIN ENTRY
SPORTS FIELDS
PARKING LOT
BUS DROP-OFF
PARENT DROP-OFF
WETLAND
PLAYGROUND
BIO-SWALE
SERVICE ENTRY
FIRE LANE
E
SF
PL
BD
PD
W
PG
BS
SV
FL
SITE PLAN KEY:
SF
SF
W
PL
PL
SV
EBDPD
PG
BSFL
BS
BS
SF
QUARTZ AVENUE
NEW COLLECTOR ROAD
BOB STRAU
B PARKWAY
WEYERH
AEUSER PRIVATE H
AUL RO
AD>SCHOOL
The Water and The Woods
Term
inal
Stu
dio
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
A. AdministrationB. KindergartenC. Jr. High ClassroomsD. ArtE. Locker RoomsF. GymnasiumG. G. Auditorium / CafeteriaH. Music / PerformanceI. KitchenJ. Elementary School LibraryK. Elementary Shool ClassroomsL. RestroomsM. Jr. High Library / Technology
C
A
B
J
F
H
I
GE
DL
L
L
L
L L
K
ground oor @ 1”=32’
FIRST SKETCH : Mt. Pisgah and the valley provide long views to the southwest and the hillsides north and east remain accessible. This first response addresses the long and short views created by the site. A passage-way that can be opened up for non-school hours by clos-ing off the pair of wings bisected the school and effectively separated the Jr. High gym and larger publicly-used spaces. Water was also an early driving force, whether it be in the class or as an outdoor class-room experience. Elementary classrooms were set up in clusters, and circulation space was made into positive teaching environments.
Water running under the circulation space, and ending up in a rehabilitated wetland zone at the southwest corner of the site was a major design element early in the project. After the first sketch ideas, we changed scales to focus on creating a classroom and a classroom cluster. My intention was to look at the way classroom spaces were used, and to intuitively create zones for specific types of activities without inhibiting the openness of the room. Hallway zones provide additional instruction space for a series of classrooms, as built-in seating create opportunity for students to learn to socialize. Each classroom has an entrance zone with a tucked away cubby space for students personal items. A reading nook resides at a corner window as a separate zone, while the center of the class remains open for various configurations and teaching styles.
At this point, I was struggling with what that classroom shape was communicating, and what the rest of the school wanted to commu-nicate. It seemed as if the school had split personalities and didn’t fit with itself in its own skin.
It became increasingly apparent that the two classrooms wings weren’t speaking the same language. Without redesigning the most significantly designed classrooms, I opted to infuse the rotating, shift-ing language into the Jr. High classroom spaces. This allowed for a really nice natural surveillance of the space for the administration, as that circulation no longer turned as sharply.
I still found myself fighting against the slope of the site. The series of ramps not only made for an awkward constant climb inside, but also was cumbersome at best to connect each cluster of Elementary pods. These pods worked well on their own, but made connecting to a larger whole very difficult. Here, I needed to make the decision between a series of parts that worked fairly well on their own, but felt as if they were not the same project, or a project that felt cohesive and whole.
While the basic organization for the school stayed the same, a clean slate was a better solution than trying to polish what I had. I ran through numerous iterations of changes, before somewhat starting with a clean slate based upon the guiding principles I had been form-ing. Administration was still camped out at the head of a North/South circulation, but it was pushed back into the public space to provide an increased visibility to the other main entrances, and down a ma-jority of the circulation space. The Middle School is still separated to the southwest with views of Mt. Pisgah, and the Elementary wing still generally moves to the east, though the new arrangement has much less slope to climb, and is an overall stronger move.
grou
nd fl
oor
1” =
64’
uppe
r flo
or1”
= 6
4’
AR
MU
AD
KG
JR EL
EL
AU
GM LR
LR
LI
SWRC
RC
RC
RC
RC
KT
E
SE
SE
SESE
SERR
RR
RD
LI
RRJR
JR
1300 sf
850 sf
999 sf
850 sf
Term
inal
Stu
dio
ADMINISTRATION
KINDERGARTEN
JR HIGH
ELEMENTARY
AUDITORIUM
GYMNASIUM
LOCKER ROOMS
LIBRARY
KITCHEN
RESTROOMS
MUSIC
ART
ROOF DECK
MAIN ENTRANCE
SECONDARY ENTRANCE
RAINWATER CATCHMENT
SWALE WINDOW
AD
KG
JR
EL
AU
GM
LR
LI
KT
RR
MU
AR
RD
E
SE
RC
SW
FLOOR PLAN KEY:
ELEMENTARY CLASSROOM
CC
ST
BSBS
WZCC
SC
SC RN RN
SC
FW
CUBBIE AND COAT-RACK
FOLDABLE WHITE BOARD WALL
WET ZONE / SINK
COMPUTER SPACE
READING NOOK
STORAGE CABINET
SECONDARY TEACHING WALL
BENCH SEATING
CC
FW
WZ
CS
RN
SC
ST
BS
GRADES 1-5 KEY:
LONGITUDINAL SECTION A: 1” = 16’
Elementary classrooms overflow into the greater circulation to extend learning out onto space otherwise unused during class-time. The classrooms themselves are uniformly set up and mirrored with adjacent rooms with a back service wall and a main teaching wall. Walls between central classrooms are set up with sound-insulated folding white-board walls for increased activity between classrooms for new teaching styles. Zones are created for various uses without confining the use of the greater space, with corner cubbies and reading nook.
Natural surveillance finds itself as a key principle with teachers having direct supervision through seat to ceiling glazing, with a ‘floating’ secondary teaching wall. Color us used in such a manner that spills between classroom and circulation.
CC
WZ
CS
RNSC
ST BS
BSBS
FW
MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOM
grad
es 6
-81/
16”
=1’
LOCKERS FACING CIRCULATION
STORAGE CABINET
TEACHING WALL
FOLDABLE WHITE BOARD WALL
BENCH SEATING
GROUP SPACE
LO
SC
TW
FW
BS
GS
GRADES 6-8 KEY: Ground floor Jr. High space extends from classrooms
to group-work spaces equipped with white board
walls and built-in benches. Floor to ceiling glazing
promotes natural supervision both into and out of
classrooms. Walls between central classrooms can
be set up as sound-insulated folding white-board
walls for increased flexibility and activity between
classrooms. A low bench along the south wall gives
intentional placement to exterior vents and tromb
walls to receive warmth from the sun.
AUDITORIUM & MIDDLE SCHOOL
BS GS
SC
TW
BS
LONGITUDINAL SECTION A LONGITUDINAL SECTION A
A color palette of blues, blue-greens and light yellow was selected for the school. Blues are calming, and is conducive for thoughtful study, but also to alertness. Blues relax. A blue-green also comes out in the public space and Junior High. Greens suggest hope, restfulness and calm, and is associated with nature, giving a peaceful secure feeling. Yellows evoke feelings of warmth and cheerfulness. Local red-pine also gives warmth, with a local palette.
Term
inal
Stu
dio
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
Initially imagined as a large single building with interior connectivity, much like a physical heart, the project began as a literal translation of the shape of a heart. Because this introverted model did not respond to the site, other options were necessary.
Beginning to reach towards the edges of the site while creating a more private south facing court-yard, this concept became a bit
more inviting, while intentionally discreetly placing parking at the least public corner of the site for the privacy of its users.
Massing begin to house programmatic elements in this phase. Thrift store is located at the residential corner to the southwest, separated by the enclosed
children’s play-space pulled off the street. Day-use space now gets south-facing sunlight while medical and counseling face the bus stop and adjacent hospital.
The newly opened courtyard to the east allowed an element of permeability, where the shelter could be easily accessible for those coming in to help or be helped, while screened off to the common passerby. The flow of people starts to move like the lifeblood they truly are.
RECEIVE PEDESTRIANS from downtown and residential
CONCEPT DIAGRAM
CENTERED on building healthy RELATIONSHIPS
INFLOW of SERVICE
OPENNESS and flow of CIRCULATION
STRUGGLING FAMILIES come here for HELP
HUMAN SERVICES, MEDICAL CLINIC, COUNSELING, & THRIFT
Stemming from the function of a heart, with life flowing both in and out of the vessel, this project took a good hard look at how individuals come to and use the facility. Site planning quickly became a primary focus of the project, to serve various needs. Inherent in the project is also the interstitial zone between privacy and interaction with the public.
Nine hundred homeless children in Eugene public schools is a number that speaks volumes for the need for helping families maintain a solid base for permanent housing. Transitional housing is patterned after apartment living, while the emergency shelter is just that. A family facility will help stop the spread of generational issues that lead to homelessness, from addictions, to job loss, to lack of education about spending money appropriately. This facility is positioned to get to the heart of why each family is struggling.
A thrift store facing the residential neighborhood serves the community and allows guests to shop with dignity for interview clothes and other necessities while the main entrance resides closest to downtown and catering to the bus station.
HEARTFLOW [Homeless Assistance Center in Eugene, OR]
13th & Olive Perspective
Site Plan Auditorium Section
Parking
Kitchen
Admin, Counseling & Medical
Transitional Housing Protected Courtyard
Protected Playground Auditorium / Classroom
Day Care
Thrift Store
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
Research focused on Parametrics using
Grasshopper, culminating in a series of
artistically perforated screens for my Homeless
Assistance Center project. Balancing daylight
and air-flow with the privacy of the clients was
integral for screening for the children’s outdoor
play space. While this project allowed me to
gain experience with Grasshopper, most of the
real rigor had to do with math and logic.
Perforation based on color brightness of a series of images
GRASSHOPPER ROUTINE
This web of processes is what
converts an image into a series
of circles, based on the value of
brightness on an X and Y grid.
Maximum perforations are set to
maintain the integrity of the corten
base. Upper and lower limits can
set perforation percentage.
Initial image Lightened image Inverse image
Parametric perforation
In Oregon’s wet weather, it is important to provide covered walkways
between buildings. This expressive covering is formed with recycled steel
I-beams, and a pair of tension rods to stabilize the long cantilever. Pacific
Northwest lumber adorns the underside of the covering while a standing seam
roof sheds water into rain garden/bio swales to help manage water on the site.
As part of the Homeless Assistance project, corten screens are playfully perforated with images of families
and children playing, while providing privacy from the street for the day-care’s outdoor play area. Screens are
optimized for 10% perforation, permitting summer breezes and daylight to pass through the permeable membrane,
allowing children peer through to the outside world. Separated by the rain-garden from the colonnade, only
individuals very near the screen can recognize individuals beyond, allowing children to see, but not be seen.
PARAMETRIC corten
Shade, privacy & rain garden
Perforated Screen and Colonnade Perforation Example
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
Connection to outdoor spaces
civic center courtyard extendedtoward police station
plaza collecting late winter sun
north grove maintains reflection across Mirror Pond
bridge crossing for bikes and pedestrians [bring people to the site]
park at Mirror Pond remain intact along public trail
open to positive space from bridge underpass
south facing ‘front yard’ plaza allows gathering
Building mass orientationClimateSite Circulation
downtown, fire station, state capital, creek
university, hospital[research]
collect sun and people at south
wrapping back to relate to civic center
eco-district
large healthy must be preserved
large trees block late summer sun
summer breezes filtered through the site
splayed face open to warmth of
setting winter sun
council chamber removed for security, daylight and
shared courtyard
cold winter wind deflected by civic center & trees
building mass faces south & collects low winter sun, stored & released later
early summer sun blocked by mature trees
Police
FireDept.
Civic Center
The city of Salem’s police department currently resides on the ground
floor of the City Hall – a building not seismically fit for primary
responders. Therefore, we were asked to delve into how a new police
station could work on this site which houses the majority of the
Government buildings. I positioned the building to be the instrument that
steps down the full story height in slope to the existing Mirror Pond. This
solution responds to the existing Civic Center’s open court, and creates
a porous south facing courtyard up on the plinth. An existing grove of
trees to the west protects from the low summer sun. In order to minimize
the impact of a large singular new building, this layout creates a campus
feel, by separating the Council Chambers, Emergency Call Center, and
Cafe, while Police parking remains under the plinth for security.
POLICEStation
Sale
m
New south-facing public plaza
Northeast approach beneath bridge
City government site layout
South facing across Mirror PondWest approach between Police and Call Center
Positive public space was absolutely
necessary with the retention of the
existing Mirror Pond, access to the
creek, and a public plaza on top of
an existing parking lot plinth with
the relocation of the city’s council
chambers.
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
timeh me
10th Street Alley at Adams
Co
rey T
em
ple
ton
• A
rch
itectu
re 5
84
S
um
mer
20
10
• P
rofe
sso
r Ji
m G
iven
s
Group site plan
Process sketches
Back yard
Adams Street section
16th inch model
a nice [back alley]
HOME
Dining room and living space
Ground floor plan
Second floor plan
Foyer Master bedroom
The homes in this new alley neighborhood were designed by 5 designers
working together to create a cohesive whole. Lot A and D create a gateway to
the alley, making it necessary to create a presence on that corner. A split-level
approach was taken to separate the master bedroom to the second floor while
the second bedroom steps down half a floor to be flexible for various stages
of life with a separate entrance. The room is perfect for renting the room to
a college student, or giving it to the teenager or grandparent who needs their
privacy, but still has need to connect to the family.
The house’s minimalist approach holds lot of built-in features in order to make
it easy to furnish and live in. Complexity in form meets simplicity of living. A
seamless transition to the outdoor courtyard from the kitchen multiplies space.
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
daylighting section diagram
early section
view from parking above rendering
view from site : Newport Harbor
site model
chapel model
Conceptually the structure is divided into two pieces, both in plan and elevation and is wrapped
by a perpendicular major circulation pattern letting light into the core of the entire project. The
first two floors address Bay Blvd, and are publicly oriented with the cafe, pub, and game-room
to the east, and functions addressing the needs of the seamen to the west. The second floor also
holds a large multipurpose space with outdoor decks to the harbor. The latter two floors are up
the hill, with uninhibited views to both the dock and Newport’s famous bridge to the South.
The chapel is made as a special element, accessible via the third floor or the pedestrian easement
at the east side of the project, which itself takes advantage of multiple landings as spaces for
pedestrians to enjoy and access the building.
view from parking above model
institute
Newport
site plan
second floor plan site section
perspective from fishermen’s dock
second floor plan
third floor plan
SEAFARERS
PRO
CESS
WO
RK
daylighting section diagramsite photo in Eugene, OR
[private residence in Eugene, OR]
ground floor plan
second floor plan
south facing section
tower floorplanswest facing tower sectionnorth facing tower section
west facing section
tower axonometric
3 SANCTUARIES
Name:Connection A @ Center of Top Chord
GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011
srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 5 1.15 Two months
# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19
1.00 <=100
Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.33 Perpendicular to Grain Softwood
45,000 psi
05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows
Inches 2.000 in 0.50 2.000 1.000 1.500 1.2501.00 2.000 2.000 1.500 1.250
Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA
oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD
G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 55.73 deg NA
0.00 rad 0.97 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.53Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi
3,150 psi 87,000 psi
5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 4,243 6,491 32,456 lbs
1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 9,417 14,407 72,033 lbs
540,51900,3769,1II00.452.76 lbs
205,61003,3751,260.018.61 lbs
2,071 3,169 15,843 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,700 2,601 13,003 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46
1.15 k3 5.64300,31106,2ESLAF lbs
King Ying & Corey Templeton
Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM
CD
CM
Ct
Cg
CD
Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)
req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)
Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners
Min. End Dist. (CD)
Cd
Ceg
Cst
ϴ degrees ϴ degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn
Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd
tm ts Im
Em Es Is
Am in2 As in2
Am/As As/Am IIIm
IIIs
Kϴ
KD
Connection A Detail:A steel plate runs through the wooden member parallel to the steel rod. The fasteners run parallel to the rod as well, but the rows lie parallel to the beam.
2”
2” 3”
2”
2”
2”
market hall trussThe design purposes behind this truss revolve around lightness
of structure and interaction with daylight. A central skylight
runs the length of the building, reinforcing its axiality, letting
light strike the rich lumber hovering over the space to fill the
space with warm, reflected light. A steel rod runs through this
horizontal lumber to take tension loads, while allowing us
to express the visual characteristics of the wood. Steel rods
provide a feeling of lightness, while efficiently receiving loads.
Internal steel plates allow the wood to be seen with simplicity.
Name:Connection B @ Horizontal Member
GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011
srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 6 1.15 Two months
# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19
1.00 <=100
Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.00 Parallel Tension Softwood
45,000 psi
05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows
Inches 2.000 in 0.50 0.750 1.750 1.500 0.7501.00 0.750 3.500 2.000 0.750
Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA
oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD
G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 180 deg NA
0.00 rad 3.14 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.15Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi
3,150 psi 87,000 psi
5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 3,267 3,748 22,488 lbs
1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 7,250 8,318 49,910 lbs
524,01737,1415,1II00.452.76 lbs
434,11609,1166,160.018.61 lbs
1,595 1,830 10,977 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,309 1,502 9,009 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46
1.50 k3 5.64900,9205,1ESLAF lbs
King Ying & Corey Templeton
Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM
CD
CM
Ct
Cg
CD
Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)
req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)
Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners
Min. End Dist. (CD)
Cd
Ceg
Cst
ϴ
degrees
ϴ
degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn
Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd
tm ts Im
Em Es Is
Am in2 As in2
Am/As As/Am IIIm
IIIs
Kϴ
KD
Connection B Detail:A 1” steel rod runs through the center beam to handle tensile forces, while the wood is mostly for aesthetics. Bolts are centrally located where the rods meet.
11” 3”3”
3”3”3”
Name:Connection B @ Horizontal Member
GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011
srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 6 1.15 Two months
# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19
1.00 <=100
Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.00 Parallel Tension Softwood
45,000 psi
05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows
Inches 2.000 in 0.50 0.750 1.750 1.500 0.7501.00 0.750 3.500 2.000 0.750
Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA
oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD
G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 180 deg NA
0.00 rad 3.14 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.15Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi
3,150 psi 87,000 psi
5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 3,267 3,748 22,488 lbs
1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 7,250 8,318 49,910 lbs
524,01737,1415,1II00.452.76 lbs
434,11609,1166,160.018.61 lbs
1,595 1,830 10,977 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,309 1,502 9,009 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46
1.50 k3 5.64900,9205,1ESLAF lbs
King Ying & Corey Templeton
Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM
CD
CM
Ct
Cg
CD
Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)
req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)
Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners
Min. End Dist. (CD)
Cd
Ceg
Cst
ϴ
degrees
ϴ
degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn
Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd
tm ts Im
Em Es Is
Am in2 As in2
Am/As As/Am IIIm
IIIs
Kϴ
KD
Connection B Detail:A 1” steel rod runs through the center beam to handle tensile forces, while the wood is mostly for aesthetics. Bolts are centrally located where the rods meet.
11” 3”3”
3”3”3”
Name:Connection A @ Center of Top Chord
GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011
srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 5 1.15 Two months
# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19
1.00 <=100
Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.33 Perpendicular to Grain Softwood
45,000 psi
05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows
Inches 2.000 in 0.50 2.000 1.000 1.500 1.2501.00 2.000 2.000 1.500 1.250
Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA
oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD
G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 55.73 deg NA
0.00 rad 0.97 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.53Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi
3,150 psi 87,000 psi
5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 4,243 6,491 32,456 lbs
1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 9,417 14,407 72,033 lbs
540,51900,3769,1II00.452.76 lbs
205,61003,3751,260.018.61 lbs
2,071 3,169 15,843 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,700 2,601 13,003 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46
1.15 k3 5.64300,31106,2ESLAF lbs
King Ying & Corey Templeton
Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM
CD
CM
Ct
Cg
CD
Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)
req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)
Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners
Min. End Dist. (CD)
Cd
Ceg
Cst
ϴ degrees ϴ degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn
Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd
tm ts Im
Em Es Is
Am in2 As in2
Am/As As/Am IIIm
IIIs
Kϴ
KD
Connection A Detail:A steel plate runs through the wooden member parallel to the steel rod. The fasteners run parallel to the rod as well, but the rows lie parallel to the beam.
2”
2” 3”
2”
2”
2”
modelingSTRUCTURALKing Tang & Corey Templeton
Structures 562 : Market HallWinter 2011 : Du� & DonofrioGTF: Sara Vernia : Tues @ 4PM
Snow Load = .154 kips
FRAME
LOAD
DEFLECTION
Max De�ection = .205”
Dead Load = .08 kips (truss, purlins, decking, roo�ng)
1” Diameter Steel Rod
1” Diameter Steel Rodinside an 8’x10’ DF#1
8’x10’ DF#1
AB
C
D
E
King Tang & Corey TempletonStructures 562 : Market Hall
Winter 2011 : Du� & DonofrioGTF: Sara Vernia : Tues @ 4PM
MOMENT & AXIAL
SHEAR
Max Moment = 2.025 kip-ftMax Tension = 7.194 kips
Max Compression = 8.502 kips
Max Shear = 0.902 kips
A
B
C
D
E
2.025 kip-ft
Max Moment
-
-
-
-
8.502 kips
Max Compression
-
-
1.579 kips
-
0.194 kips
Max Tension
4.327 kips
2.488 kips
-
7.194 kips
0.902 kips
Max Shear
-
-
-
-
0.150 in
Max De�ection
0.194 in
0.032 in
0.216 in
0.173 in
Project 2
Project 2window wall at floor 2window head at brick wall top of parapet
window sill at brick wall
detailingENCLOSURE
Analysis Corey TempletonEnclosures: Fall 2011
GTF CarbonnierProject 2
Brick Wall Shading MaskThis shade chart shows that the horizontal external shade does little in blocking sun except for between 11am and Noon (seen in green). The fact that the window is recessed into the brick wall actually accounts for a fairly large chunk during the same time frame.
Glazing Wall Shading Mask:Being set back 10’ from the brick building, the vertical fin does not need to be as close to the building. However, in this analysis, I found that my drop-down shading device (seen here in green) did not actually help shade any sun that the fins were missing - but perhaps more glare.
Brick Wall Daylight Factor = 2.52.5 x VT .64 = 1.6
Glazing Wall Daylight Factor = 2.52.5 x .64 = 1.6
SOLARBAN 70XL GLAZING:LT 64%U-VALUE .27SHGC .27SHADING COEFFICIENT .32OUTDOOR VLR 12%
% of wall R-Value sectionparapet up to top of slab 10.379 9 120 1080 7.5 5.56 77.8425 0.1
stainless steel coping 0.0095/8” plywood sheathing 0.77
-9.6
louver section 3 17 120 2040 14.17 10.49 42.5 0.2inoperable louvers -insulated operable louvers (1/2” thick) 3
glazing 3.70 128 120 -530 14830 102.99 76.29 381.43 0.2mullion 0.40 8 120 530 1490 10.35 7.66 4.14 1.9
19440 135 100 2.4
GLAZED / OPAQUE AREA (GLAZED WALL) R-Value per sqftHeight
(inches)Width
(inches)
Additional Vertical
Mullion Area
Material Square Inches SqFt.
Weighted R-Value
sbpo water barrier4” metal stud w/ batt insulation
% of wall R-Value sectionparapet up to top of slab 23.33 9 120 1080 7.5 10.12 174.975 0.1
4” brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18
-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.774” metal stud cavity w/ NO insulation 1.94
louver section 3 17 120 2040 14.17 19.12 42.5 0.4inoperable louvers -insulated operable louvers (1/2” thick) 3
glazing 3.70 102 68 -544 6936 48.17 65.02 178.40 0.4mullion 0.40 102 6 544 612 4.25 5.74 1.70 3.4low brick wall under window 23.78 28 72 2016 14.00 18.90 332.92 0.1
4” deep brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18
-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.776” metal stud cavity with NO insulation 1.941/2” gypsum wallboard 0.45
brick wall @ sides of windows 23.78 136 64 8704 60.44 81.59 1437.37 0.14” deep brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18
-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.776” metal stud cavity with NO insulation 1.941/2” gypsum wallboard 0.45
10668 74.0833 100 4.2
GLAZED / OPAQUE AREA (BRICK WALL) R-Value per sqftHeight
(inches)Width
(inches)
Additional Vertical
Mullion Area
Material Square Inches SqFt.
Weighted R-Value
sbpo water barrier
sbpo water barrier
sbpo water barrier
cutaway axonometric of window wall and vertical sunshade7 window wall and vertical sunshade
COREY TEMPLETONM.Arch | U.Oregon [email protected]