core schools update...core presentation: purpose the purpose of this presentation is to provide an...
TRANSCRIPT
CORE Schools Update Communities Organized to Reach Excellence
Presented by:
Chief Academic Officer: John Youngquist
Learning Community Directors: Carole Jennings, Kathleen Shiverdecker, Andre Wright
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future 1
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
CORE Presentation: Purpose
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an update on the progress of schools identified as needing a defined school improvement or turnaround strategy.
This presentation is provided to the Board of Education as an information item representing recommendations for CORE strategies that the Division of Equity in Learning is making to the APS Superintendent
2
APS CORE Schools
• APS identified a systematic body of work as the Communities Organized to Reach Excellence or “CORE” program
• CORE addresses schools that are identified on the state accountability clock under SB-163
• CORE schools are identified to receive designated interventions, resources and other types of initiatives designed to address their specific challenges
• Each intervention, resource, and initiative is meant to connect the leaders, teachers and learners with a community of practice in targeted areas
• This approach aligns with the Core Beliefs set forth in APS 2020 Shaping the Future
CORE Timeline
CORE schools have a clear and predictable timeline for designation and implementation of strategies.
• Goal:
– To rapidly move out of designation and sustain improvement. – To have conditions in place for Turnaround implementation or the successful
engagement of a coherent school improvement strategy
• Expectations: – Implementation of a School Turnaround Strategy should yield identified
results within two years – Implementation of a School Improvement Strategy should yield identified
results in one year
• Designation is identified through the CDE School Performance Framework • Designation removed upon demonstration of sustainability
CORE Timeline
• Year 1 – Identified on the DSS for Targeted or Intensive supports – Engage educational audit – Develop school improvement plan with embedded performance targets – Consider staffing changes – Consider for turnaround leadership program
• Year 2 – Identified on the DSS for Targeted or Intensive supports – Engage educational audit – Develop school improvement plan – Consider staffing changes – Implement Turnaround Leadership Team
• Year 3 – Recommendation made for school improvement or turnaround strategy
• Year 4 – School Improvement-monitor benchmarks – Turnaround-planning and design year
• Year 5 – School Improvement-recommendation for turnaround strategy – Turnaround- restart
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Sable Elementary School Data Snapshot
6
Sable Elementary School Data Snapshot
2015-16 SPF Status: Priority Improvement Year 2 Title 1: Yes DSS Status: Green
# of Students: 561 Enrollment to Capacity: 111% F/R Lunch: 87.3%
ELL: 66% ESS: 13% GT: 2% Homeless: 10.3%
Achievement and Growth • CMAS/PARCC District Average Met/Exceeded Expectations Compared to School % ME+: Eng/LA: Grade 3: 18.4/11.6% Grade 4: 20.6/20.6% Grade 5: 18.8/8.3% Math: Grade 3: 15.5/2.1% Grade 4: 12.2/1.5% Grade 5: 11.2/5.6%
Human Resources • Principal Status: 4th Year and Continuing 2016-17 • Teacher Turnover (trend): 12-’13… 6.45% ’13-’14… 0.00% ’14-’15… 12.5%
School Climate • Average Daily Attendance… ‘13-’14… 93.9% ’14-’15… 94.1 ‘15-16 thru Q3… 94.3% • % Students Chronic Absence… ‘13-’14… 20% ’14-’15… 18% ‘15-’16 thru Q3…16.3% • Behavior/# of Suspensions… ‘13-’14… 32 ‘14-15… 36 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 15
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Sable Elementary Background 2013-2014
7
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teacher development in reading strategies to support ELLs specifically, oral language and vocabulary development
2. Teacher development on how to teach the writing standards 3. Critical Learning Phases in math using formative assessments to analyze and plan
1. RMC Audit 2. First year of READ Act
intervention funding 3. Application and
engagement of School Improvement Support grant with focus on teacher professional development
4. Implementation of Site Visits with superintendent and district leadership team
1. Attendance stable from prior year
2. Increase in behavioral incidence relative to prior year
3. General increases in TCAP outcomes for every content area
4. Positive trend in performance of ELL’s
5. Continued SPF status of Priority Improvement
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Sable Elementary Background 2014-2015
8
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teacher development in reading strategies to support ELLs specifically, oral language and vocabulary development 2. Critical Learning Phases in math using formative assessments to analyze and plan
1. Additional RMC Audit 2. Equity in Learning
Restructure for super- vision and support
3. Transition from District Coaches to on-site Teaching Partners
4. Continuation of SIS grant actions
5. Engagement of Executive Coaching for principal
6. Allocation of two Community Corp
1. Continuation of Priority Improvement SPF status
2. Difficult to interpret academic outcomes from initial year of CMAS implementation
3. Initial decrease in chronic non-attenders
4. Behavioral incidence remain high/stable
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Sable Elementary Background 2015-2016
9
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. English Language Arts through Professional Learning Communities (PLC) teachers will understand how to use data to plan for precise whole and small group instruction 2. Math through Professional Learning Communities (PLC) teachers will use data to plan for precise whole and small group instruction.
1. Engagement of Executive Coaching for principal
2. Title 1 mini-grant for teacher coaching
3. Participation in University of Virginia Turnaround Leadership Programming
4. Weekly LC Director visits 5. Turnaround Leadership
Team 6. Transition from Admin
ToSA to full Asst. Principal
1. CDE did not issue new SPFs
2. Positive trends toward proficiency with Acuity Interim Assessments
3. Continuing positive trend with attendance
4. Behavioral incidence are trending lower than prior years
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Sable Elementary: CORE Recommendation
SCHOOL: Sable
2016-17 CORE
Recommendation
School Improvement
Action
2016-17
CORE Support
•CDE Connect with Success Grant •Continuation of UVA Turnaround Leadership program and other current supports determined to be supportive and impactful •Continuation of Turn- around Leadership Team
Expected Outcome •Advancement to Performance or Improvement SPF status as reported in 2017
CDE SPF Priority
Improvement
Intentional School
Culture
Educator
Effectiveness
Instructional Design
and Outcomes
Family & Community
Engagement
Key Lack of
Progress Demonstrating
Progress Positive Trend
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Wheeling Elementary School Data Snapshot
11
Wheeling Elementary School Snapshot
2015-16 SPF Status: Priority Improvement Year 2 Title 1: *Yes DSS Status: Green
Number of Students: 573 Enrollment to Capacity 93% F/R Lunch: 79.4%
ELL: 53% ESS: 10.8% GT: .7% Homeless: 8%
Achievement and Growth • CMAS/PARCC District Average Met/Exceeded Expectations Compared to School % ME+: Eng/LA: Grade 3: 18.4/5.3% Grade 4: 20.6/10.2% Grade 5: 18.8/11.9% Math: Grade 3: 15.5/2.2% Grade 4: 12.2/6.8% Grade 5: 11.2/1.2%
Human Resources • Principal Status: 4th Year and Continuing 2016-17 • Teacher Turnover (trend): ‘12-’13… 7.5% ’13-’14… 12.2% ’14-’15… 20.93%
School Climate • Average Daily Attendance… ‘13-’14… 93.4% ’14-’15… 93.3 ‘15-16 thru Q3… 94.5% • % Students Chronic Absence… ‘13-’14… 24.8% ’14-’15… 24.5% ‘15-’16 thru Q3…17.3% • Behavior/# of Suspensions… ‘13-’14… 140 ‘14-15… 86 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 41
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Wheeling Elementary Background 2013-2014
12
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teachers develop knowledge of literacy skills across reading, writing, speaking and listening 2. Teachers plan and deliver instruction informed by assessments aligned to academic standards 3. Teachers foster a predictable learning environment in the classroom in which each student has a positive, nurturing relationship with caring adults and peers
1. RMC Instructional Audit 2. Addition of Assistant
Principal 3. Implementation of
behavioral support position
4. Initial allocation of READ Act resources
5. Initiation of superin- tendent and leadership team site support visits
1. Continuation of Priority Improvement SPF status
2. Trend for TCAP scores low and stable
3. Attendance outcomes represent low attendance levels
4. Behavioral incidence very high and rising
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Wheeling Elementary Background 2014-2015
13
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teachers develop knowledge of literacy skills across reading, writing, speaking and listening 2. Teachers plan and deliver instruction informed by assessments aligned to academic standards 3. Teachers foster a predictable learning environment in the classroom in which each student has a positive, nurturing relationship with caring adults and peers adults and peers.
1. RMC instructional audit & CDE Mass Insight audit
2. Transition to on-site Teaching Partners
3. Implementation of School Improvement Strategies grant- literacy
4. Engagement of Executive Coaching for principal
5. Applied for CDE Turnaround Leadership Network and RELAY principal training
6. DSS Allocation for Playworks
7. 2 Community Corps
1. Continuation of Priority Improvement SPF status
2. Difficult to interpret academic outcomes from initial year of CMAS implementation
3. Low-average attendance continuing
4. Decrease in significant behavioral events
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Wheeling Elementary Background 2015-2016
14
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teachers plan And consistently deliver instruction that is aligned to academic standards and draws on results of student assessments. 2. Teachers foster a predictable learning environment in the classroom in which each student has a positive, nurturing relationship with caring adults and peers.
1. Continued implemen- tation of SIS grant actions- focus on literacy
2. Continuation of Executive Coaching for principal
3. Continued participation in CDE Turnaround Leadership Network and RELAY principal training
4. Renewed focus on full implementation of Inter- national Baccalaureate
5. Full implementation of No Nonsense Nurturing
6. Engagement as Equity Focus School
1. CDE did not issue new SPFs
2. While difficult to interpret first full year of CMAS, literacy focus may be engaging
3. Increases in average daily attendance with trend toward decrease in chronic absenteeism
4. Continued decrease in significant behavioral events
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Wheeling Elementary: CORE Recommendation
SCHOOL: Wheeling
2016-17 CORE
Recommendation
School Improvement
Action
2016-17
CORE Support
•Continue leadership participation in Executive Coaching and CDE Turnaround Network •Continue as Equity Focus School •Continue with strengthening toward full IB implementation •Development of significant family engagement strategy
Expected Outcome •Advancement to Performance or Improvement SPF status as reported in 2017
CDE SPF Priority
Improvement
Intentional School
Culture
Educator
Effectiveness
Instructional Design
and Outcomes
Family & Community
Engagement
Key Lack of
Progress Demonstrating
Progress Positive Trend
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Jewell Elementary School Data Snapshot
16
Jewell Elementary School Snapshot
2015-16 SPF Status: Turnaround Year 1 Title 1: No DSS Status: Green
Number of Students: 514 Enrollment to Capacity: 94% F/R Lunch: 73.7%
ELL: 39% ESS: 9.1% GT: .2% Homeless: 10.7%
Achievement and Growth • CMAS/PARCC District Average Met/Exceeded Expectations Compared to School % ME+: Eng/LA: Grade 3: 18.4/18.1% Grade 4: 20.6/22.4% Grade 5: 18.8/14.7% Math: Grade 3: 15.5/11.8% Grade 4: 12.2/4.7% Grade 5: 11.2/15.8%
Human Resources: • Principal Status: 4th Year (new principal for 2016-17) • Teacher Turnover (trend): ‘12-’13… 6.06% ’13-’14… 12.5% ’14-’15… 17.65%
School Climate • Average Daily Attendance… ‘13-’14… 94.6% ’14-’15… 94.7 ‘15-16 thru Q3… 94.4% • % Students Chronic Absence… ‘13-’14… 19.8 ’14-’15… 18.9 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 19.% • Behavior/# of Suspensions… ‘13-’14… 80 ‘14-15… 44 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 25
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Jewell Elementary Background 2013-2014
17
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Increase capacity of every teacher through a one-on-one coaching model 2. Use of the gradual release of support (responsibility) to plan and teach. 3. Monitor and analyze disaggregated data in order to provide clear and precise feedback.
1. Initial allocation of READ Act resources
2. Initiation of superin- tendent and leadership team site support visits
3. Identification as Inst Tech Focus School
4. Superintendent directed funding for:
-Increases in Mental Health Support -Assistant Principal -Inst. Coaching -Three para positions
1. Moved from Turnaround to Improvement status
2. After one year increase, TCAP scores represent decrease
3. Behavioral incidence very high and rising
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Jewell Elementary Background 2014-2015
18
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teachers will understand how to formatively assess the use of specific skills to inform and scaffold explicit instruction so that students will collaboratively and independently apply skills across all content areas. 2. Teachers will understand how to monitor student acquisition and application of specific skills to scaffold student learning so that students will be proficient literate learners.
1. RMC Instructional Audit 2. Increased site visits with
LC Director 3. National Site
Administrative Manager (SAMs) Training for Principal and support
4. Increased para-professional support
5. Initiation of Inquiry-based instructional focus
1. Moved from Improvement to Turnaround status on SPF
2. Difficult to interpret academic outcomes from initial year of CMAS implementation
3. Student attendance remains consistent with prior year
4. Incidence of behavioral events decreasing
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Jewell Elementary Background 2015-2016
19
Major Improvement Strategy
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Teachers implement high quality instruction that is aligned to academic standards 2. Teachers plan for and effectively use Data Driven Instruction
1. Executive Coaching for Principal
2. DSS Resource for literacy intervention
3. Implementation of MTSS 4. Implementation of
restorative practices with ReSolutionaries
5. CDE Turnaround Leadership Network
6. RELAY principal training 7. Shift away from “Inquiry”
focus to common-core/data-driven instructional planning
1. CDE did not issue new SPFs
2. Enrollment decrease of over 100 students at start of 2016 school year
3. 2015 CMAS outcomes near district average
4. Average daily attendance and chronic absentee numbers consistent with prior years
5. Incidence of significant behavioral incidence lowering
6. New principal will be hired for 2016-17 school year
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Jewell Elementary: CORE Recommendation
SCHOOL: Jewell
2016-17 CORE
Recommendation
School Improvement
Action
2016-17
CORE Supports
•Hire of Turnaround Principal •Engage new leader in continuation of CDE Turnaround Network and RELAY Principal Training •Engagement in Achievement Network programming
Expected Outcome •Advancement to Performance or Improvement SPF status as reported in 2017
CDE SPF Turnaround
Intentional School
Culture
Educator
Effectiveness
Instructional Design
and Outcomes
Family & Community
Engagement
Key Lack of
Progress Demonstrating
Progress Positive Trend
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Fletcher Community School Data Snapshot
21
Fletcher Community School Snapshot
2015-16 SPF Status: Turnaround Year 1 Title 1: Yes DSS Status: Green
Number of Students: 371 Enrollment to Capacity: 57% F/R Lunch: 90.6%
ELL: 71.2% ESS: 16.2% GT: .1.6% Homeless:10.7%
Achievement and Growth • CMAS/PARCC District Average Met/Exceeded Expectations Compared to School % ME+: Eng/LA: Grade 3: 18.4/2.17% Grade 4: 20.6/5.3% Grade 5: 18.8/6.4% Math: Grade 3: 15.5/0.00% Grade 4: 12.2/0.00% Grade 5: 11.2/3.8%
Human Resources: • Principal Status: 6th Year (new principal for 2016-17) • Teacher Turnover (trend): ‘12-’13… 25% ’13-’14… 22.73% ’14-’15… 21.15%
School Climate: • Average Daily Attendance… ‘13-’14… 94.3% ’14-’15… 93.6% ‘15-16 thru Q3… 93.6% • % Students Chronic Absence… ‘13-’14… 20.9 ’14-’15… 24.8 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 22.6% • Behavior/# of Suspensions… ‘13-’14… 28 ‘14-15… 29 ‘15-’16 thru Q3… 15
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Fletcher Community School Background 2013-2014
22
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Use a professional learning process that is job embedded and includes goal setting, specific feedback, exemplars, and time to practice through shared school leadership and decision-making.
1. With Pilot School status: created of a calendar that responded directly to teacher feedback regarding professional learning needs
2. First year as a K-5 Pilot School (after closure of Fletcher Intermediate)
3. School leadership and staff opted out of participation in district-level professional development for teachers, except for specific program requirements (ie: ESS)
1. CDE SPF status was Performance, after two years of Turnaround status
2. 10% decrease in TCAP proficiency level (only grade 3 available)
3. CELA outcomes accounted for 75% of School Performance Framework ratings due to lack of growth indicators for Fletcher Primary
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future 23
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Develop understandings around differentiated instruction and implement research-based instructional strategies for differentiation across grade levels in all content areas in order to increase achievement across all student groups.
1. CDE external audit 2. Transition to P-20
Community Support Team structure
3. Participated in school-based professional learning
4. Chose not to gain access to Teaching Partner
5. Instituted site-based teacher coaching plan
6. Site visits with Superinten-dent and Leadership Team
7. Joint Steering Committee walk-through site visit and evaluation
1. CDE Turnaround SPF Status continued
2. Persistently low level of attendance continuing
3. Initial CMAS implementation provided representation of persistent low performance
Fletcher Community School Background 2014-2015
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future 24
Major Improvement Strategies
Significant CORE Actions & Investments
Outcomes/Trends
1. Base instruction on grade level or higher expectations through effective data analysis, understanding the content, having thorough knowledge of what grade level proficiency looks like, and making effective decisions on instructional approaches.
1. RMC External Audit 2. Participation in CDE
Turnaround Network offered- school not participating
3. Principal and Teachers at multiple grade levels engaged in coaching with Catapult Leadership
4. Joint Steering Committee site visit and evaluation
5. Reimplementation of Governing Board in January
6. Teachers participated in monthly Professional Learning sessions
1. CDE did not issue new SPFs
2. CMAS/PARCC outcomes for 2015 were at the 1st percentile, of 100, in the State of Colorado
3. Pilot Joint Steering Committee recommending to Superintendent and Board of Education to withdraw Pilot status for 2016-17 school year
4. New principal will be hired for the 2016-17 school year
Fletcher Community School Background 2015-2016
Every Student Shapes a Successful Future
Fletcher Community: CORE Recommendation
SCHOOL: Fletcher
2016-17 CORE
Recommendation
Turnaround Action
2016-17 CORE Supports
1.Recommendation from JSC to withdraw Pilot status 2.Hire of new principal for 2016-2017 school year 3.Implementation of Turnaround Actions that may include:
- change in grade levels served
- transition to APS Learning Community School status - transition to charter school program - application for state level innovation status
Expected Outcome •Advancement to Performance or Improvement SPF status as reported in 2018
CDE SPF Turnaround
Intentional School
Culture
Educator
Effectiveness
Instructional Design
and Outcomes
Family & Community
Engagement
Key Lack of
Progress Demonstrating
Progress Positive Trend
Questions and Conversation