copyright is owned by the author of the thesis. permission is ......phosphorus removal from a...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author.
BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL
FROM A PHOSPHORUS RICH
DAIRY PROCESSING WASTEWATER
A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements
for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
In
Environmental Engineering
at
Massey University
Turitea Campus, Palmerston North,
New Zealand
PAUL O. BICKERS
2005
,\, • � ,_r
".� .. "--
i' o� . Massey University � COLLEGE OF SCIENCES
CANDIDATE'S DECLARATION
COLLEGE OF SCIENCES Private Bag 102904 North Shore Mail Centre Auckland New Zealand T 6494140800 extn 9522 F 6494418 181 http://sciences.massey.ac.nz
This is to certify that the research carried out for my Doctoral thesis entitled "Biological
Phosphorus Removal From a Phosphorus Rich Dairy Processing Wastewater" in the
Institute of Technology, Massey University, Palmertson North, New Zealand is my own
work and that the thesis material has not been used in part or in whole for any other
qualification.
Candidate'S Name Paul Oliver Bickers
Signature O'-/ .. ;�/;;r 1« �, /J .r, ; ,L j V - li._'<_.J
-Z_{!b tjotf
"�.,-�� ·l .... t -� f" . == � -: " :�;.'f., I. Massey University -i ". COLLEGE Of SCIENCES
SUPERVISOR'S DECLARATION
COLLEGE OF SCIENCES Private Bag 102904 North Shore Mail Centre Auckland New Zealand T 649 414 0800 extn 9522 F 649441 8181 http://sciences.massey.ac.nz
This is to certify that the research carried out for the Doctoral thesis entitled "Biological
Phosphorus Removal From a Phosphorus Rich Dairy Processing Wastewater" was
done by Paul Oliver Bickers in the Institute of Technology, Massey University,
Palmerston North New Zealand. The thesis material has not been used in part or in
whole for any other qualification, and I confirm that the candidate has pursued the
course of study in accordance with the requirements of the Massey University
regulations:
Supervisor's Name Rao Bhamidimarri
Signature
.. �".". . . 1;' Massey University � COLLEGE OF SCIENCES
CERTIFICATE OF REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
This is to certify that the research carried out in the Doctoral Thesis entitled
Biological Phosphorus Removal From A Phosphorus Rich Dairy Processing
Wastewater
COLLEGE OF SCIENCES Private Bag 102904 North Shore Mail Centre Auckland New Zealand T 64 9 414 OBOO extn 9522 F 649441 B1Bl http://sciences.massev.ac.nz
in the Institute Of Technology and Engineering at Massey University, New Zealand:
(a) is the original work of the candidate, except as indicated by appropriate
attribution in the text and/or in the acknowledgements;
(b) that the text, excluding appendices/annexes, does not exceed 100 000 words;
(c) all the ethical requirements applicable to this study have been complied with as
required by Massey University, other organisations and/or committees ___ _
which had a particular association
with this study, and relevant legislation.
Please insert Ethical Authorisation code(s) here if applicable ________ _
Candidate's Name: Paul O. Bickers
Signature: Pf�C(>�S supervisor'SNa�e]: R� ;hVl�mi
,
dimarri
Signature: !JI.I �f( I Date: '
.2f(t6(OV \
ABSTRACT
A phosphorus rich wastewater, typical of a dairy processing site producing milk
powder, was biologically treated in a continuous activated sludge reactor.
A l iterature review indicated there was a vast amount of information on the
mechanisms of the Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) process and
its application to domestic wastewaters, but little successful research on its application
to dairy processing wastewater.
The biodegradability of the wastewater organic fractions was assessed due to their
impact on the EBPR process. Continuous anaerobic fennentation tests were used to
detennine the concentration of volatile fatty acids that could be generated, as these are
required for successful EBPR. A fermenter hydraulic retention time of 1 2 hours and a
temperature of 35 °C generated the highest concentration of volatile fatty acids, with
an acidification rate of 65% (based on 0.451lm filtered COD).
To permit improved dissolved oxygen control and increased flexibility, a multi-zone
reactor was designed. A fermentation stage was also incorporated prior to the
activated sludge reactor. This reactor was operated with anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic
zones at an SRT of 1 0 days and stable biological phosphorus removal was achieved.
A maximum of 4 1 .5 mg P/L was removed and phosphorus release and PHA storage
occurred in both the anaerobic and anoxic zones. The soluble COD consumed in the
unaerated zones (anaerobic + anoxic) totalled 484 mg COD/L on the day of the zone
study (day 1 58) . The aerobic sludge phosphorus concentration averaged 7.0% mg
Plmg VSS after system optimisation. The anaerobic volume was doubled in order to
increase the anaerobic consumption of volatile fatty acids. This change increased the
amount of soluble COD consumption in the unaerated zones to 632 mg P/L after 40
days but did not result in a significant increase in biological phosphorus removal.
In the next senes of trials, the concentration of nitrogen in the wastewater was
decreased and the anoxic zone removed. This change did not improve the amount of
biological phosphorus removal , which was 35 mg P/L at an SRT of 1 0 days. The
effect of different sludge retention times was then investigated. Increasing the SRT to
11
1 5 days resulted in little change in phosphorus removal (34.5 mg P/L). Decreasing the
SRT to 5 days resulted in the loss of EBPR.
The medium term effect on the EBPR process by removing the fermentation stage
was also assessed using an AO configuration at an SRT of 1 0 days. The amount of
phosphorus removed decreased slightly after 34 days to 34 mg P/L, but the soluble
COD consumed in the anaerobic zone increased to 624 mg P/L.
It was concluded that a stable EBPR process could be established when treating a
dairy processing wastewater with a continuous activated sludge reactor. The
biological stability was sensitive to changes in the solids retention time and the
removal of the fermentation stage.
111
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to acknowledge Professor Rao Bhamidimarri for establishing thi s project and
encouraging me to undertake it and also his patience during this long process of
completion. I also wish to acknowledge the financial support and input of the New
Zealand Dairy Research Insitute (now Fonterra Reseach), especially Mike Donkin,
Jim Bamett and latterly John Russell and Joanna Shepherd. Their patience has also
been much appreciated.
The assistance of the technical staff of the Massey University Institute of Technology
has also been much appreciated. Without the input of Don McLean in the mechanical
workshop and Bruce Col ins in the electrical workshop, this project would not have
been possible as they made my experimental concepts a reality. Thanks very much
Don and Bruce. Thanks also to John Sykes for providing analytical assistance and
keeping the instruments functioning and to Anne-Marie Jackson for placing
consumables orders and finding equipment. Mention must be made of the golf
outings with Don and John that kept me partial ly sane. The companionship and
knowledge of Magnus Christensson during his two years working on this difficult
project was also invaluable.
The encouragement and support of Andy Shilton who completed his own thesis while
continuing a busy lecturing schedule has been much appreciated. Thanks mate.
Finally thanks to my family for their support. To my wife Fiona and o ur daughters
Sera and Amy for putting up with this whole process. As we have progressed through
marriage, having a family, changing cities and employment this study has always
been present, hopefully now we can look forward to more time together. Leana Hola!
Thanks also to my mother for her solid support as always, this thesis is dedicated to
her.
IV
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Table of Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations and Nomenclature
Chapter 1 : Introduction
1 . 1 The New Zealand Dairy Industry and Wastewater Management
1 .2 Phosphorus and the Dairy Industry
Page
11
IV
v
x
xvii
XXI
2
1 . 3 Biological Phosphorus Removal and dairy Processing Wastewater 2
1 .4 Research Approach 3
1 . 5 Specific Objectives 4
Chapter 2 : Literature Review 6
2 . 1 Phosphorus and the Environment 6
2 .2 Chemical and Biological Phosphorus Removal Options 7
2.2. 1 Chemical 7
2.2 .2 Biological 8
2 .3 Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) 9
2.3 . 1 Principles of EBPR 9
2 .3 .2 Biochemical Principles of EBPR 1 0
2 .3 .3 Microbiology of EBPR 1 4
2 .3 .4 Substrate Influences on EBPR 1 4
2 .3 .5 Influences of Substrates on the Microbial Population 1 7
2 .4 Biological Phosphorus Removal Systems 1 9
v
2 .4. 1 EBPR Systems without Nitrogen Removal 20
2.2.2 EBPR Systems with Nitrogen Removal 20
2.4.3 Factors Affecting EBPR System Perfonnance 23
2.5 Dairy Processing Wastewater 23
2 .5 . 1 Characteristics o f Dairy Processing Wastewater 24
2 .5. 1 . 1 Nitrogen 26
2.5 . 1 .2 Phosphorus 28
2 .5 .2 Synthetic Dairy Processing Wastewater 29
2.6 Biological Phosphorus Removal from Dairy Processing Wastewater 30
2.7
2 .8
Chapter 3 :
3 . 1
3 .2
Fennentation of Dairy Processing Wastewater
Summary
Analytical and Experimental Methodology
Introduction
Analytical Methodology
3 .2 . 1 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Volatile Suspended Solids (VSS)
3 .2 .2 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
3 .2 .3 Total Phosphorus (TP)
3 .2 .5 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
3 .2.6 Ammonia
3 .2 .7 Glycogen
3 .2 .8 Poly-B-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA)
3 .2 .9 Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA's)
3 .2 . 1 0 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Oxygen Uptake Rate (OUR and SOUR)
VI
33
35
36
36
36
36
38
39
40
4 1
4 1
4 1
42
44
44
3 .2 . 1 1 Sludge Volume Index 45
3 .2 . 1 2 pH Measurement 46
3 .3 Laboratory -Scale Reactors 46
3 .3 . 1 Preliminary AAO Reactor System 46
3 .3 .2 Preliminary MUCT Reactor System 50
3 .3 . 3 Zoned Activated Sludge Reactor System 52
3 .3 .4 Fermentation reactor 55
3 .3 .5 Laboratory Pumps 55
3 .3 .6 Reactor System Steady State 55
3 .4 Synthetic Wastewater Composition 57
Chapter 4 : Wastewater Characterisation and Fennentation Studies 60
4 . 1 Introduction 60
4.2 Synthetic Dairy Processing Wastewater 60
4.3 COD Fractionation of Waste water 6 1
4.3 . 1 Aerobic Batch Tests 63
4.3 .2 Anoxic Batch Tests 66
4.4 Fermentation of Dairy Processing Wastewater 72
4.4. 1 Fermentation Studies 74
4.5 Discussion 77
4.6 Conclusions 78
Chapter 5 : Preliminary EBPR Reactor Studies 79
5 . 1 Introduction 79
5 .2 AAO Configuration 79
5.2. 1 Reactor Operation 8 1
5 .2.2 Nitrogen Removal 84
Vll
5 .2.3 Phosphorus Removal 86
5 .2 .4 Discussion 87
5.3 MU CT Configuration 89 5 .3 . 1 Reactor Operation 90
5 .3 .2 Discussion 95
5.4 Conclusions 97
Chapter 6: Combined Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal - AAO Zoned Reactor Studies 98
6 . 1 Introduction 98
6.2 Reactor System 98
6 .3 Fermenter Operation 1 01
6.4 Zoned BNR Reactor Operation 1 03
6.4. 1 Zone Analysis 1 09
6.4.2 Batch Test 1 1 5
6.5 Extended Anaerobic Retention Time Test 1 20
6 .5 . 1 Extended Anaerobic HRT AAO Reactor (EAAO) Zone Study 1 20
6.5 .2 EAAO Anaerobic Batch Test 1 25
6.6 Discussion 1 28
6 .7 Conclusion 1 36
Chapter 7 : Phosphorus Removal-AO Zoned Reactor Studies 1 3 8
7 . 1 Introduction 1 3 8
7 .2 Reactor System 1 39
7 .3 Fermenter Operation 1 42
7.4 1 0 Day SRT AO Reactor Zone Study 1 44
7.4 . 1 Batch Test 1 5 1
viii
7 .5 AO Reactor Operation at an S RT of 15 days 1 54
7 .5 . 1 Reactor Operation 1 54
7 .5 .2 Zone Analysis 1 59
7 .5 .3 Batch Test 1 66
7 .6 AO Reactor Operation at an SRT of 5 days 1 69
7.6. 1 Reactor Operation 1 69
7.6.2 Zone Study 1 74
7 .7 Discussion 178
7 .8 Conclusions 1 83
Chapter 8 : Influences on Phosphorus Removal 1 85
8 . 1 Introduction 1 83
8.2 Phosphorus Precipitation 1 85
8 .3 Cessation of Extemal Fennentation - Medium Term Effects 1 90
8.3 . 1 Batch Test 1 97
8 .4 Nutrient Requirements 1 99
8 .5 Discussion 203
8 .6 Conclusion 205
Chapter 9 : Final Discussion and Conclusions 207
9. 1 Introduction 207
9.2 Phosphorus Removal 208
9.3 Reactor System Comparisons 209
9.4 Full-Scale Implications 2 1 3
9.5 Future Research 215
9 .6 Recommendations 2 1 6
Chapter 1 0: Appendix 2 1 8
IX
Chapter 1 1 : References 229
Chapter 2
Figure 2 . 1 :
Figure 2.2:
Figure 2 . 3 :
Figure 2 .4:
Figure 2 .5 :
Figure 2 .6 :
Figure 2 .7 :
F igure 2 . 8 :
Figure 2 .9 :
Figure 2 . 1 0:
Chapter 3
Figure 3 . 1 :
Figure 3 .2 :
Figure 3 . 3 :
Figure 3 .4 :
Figure 3 . 5 :
Figure 3 .6 :
Figure 3 .7:
LIST OF FIGURES
Biological Effects of Eutrophication
(Queens University Belfast, 2003).
Page
6
Profiles of soluble BOO and phosphorus during the EBPR process. 1 0
Schematic diagrams for the behaviour proposed by the
ComeaulWentzel model unanaerobic (a) and aerobic conditions (b). 1 2
Schematic diagrams of the biochemical mechanisms proposed by
the Mino model under anaerobic (a) and aerobic conditons (b). 1 3
EBPR system without nitrogen removal (AO).
AAO system or 3 -stage modified Bardenpho.
Modified (5-stage) Bardenpho, Phoredox.
UCT process.
Modified UCT.
SBR sequencing for biological phosphorus removal.
Example of GC chromatogram for PHB and PHV analysis.
Schematic of OUR measurement technique.
Schematic of AAO laboratory activated sludge system.
Picture of initial AAO laboratory activated sludge system.
Schematic of Modified UCT laboratory activated sludge system.
Schematic of improved laboratory zoned reactor system.
Zoned reactor system showing clarifier and stirrer, DO control
System and temperature control unit.
20
2 1
2 1
22
22
23
44
45
48
49
5 1
53
54
Figure 3 . 8 : Mixed liquor contents of zoned reactor system. 54
Figure 3 .9: Schematic of fermenter process. 56
Figure 3 . 1 0 : Photo of fermenter system showing 40C synthetic wastewater
Storage refrigerator on the right and fennented wastewater
refrigerator on the left.
x
57
Chapter 4
Figure 4. 1 : RBCOD detennination using aerobic batch test method for
Synthetic dairy processing wastewater (S/X=0.05). 65
Figure 4.2: RBCOD detennination using aerobic batch test method for
Synthetic dairy processing wastewater (S/X=0. 1 2). 66
Figure 4.3 : Anoxic batch test NUR graph for four different substrates. 69
Figure 4.4: Anoxic batch test comparison for acetate and synthetic dairy
processing wastewater. 7 1
Figure 4.5 : The percentage of each VF A as a fraction of the total VF A COD. 75
Chapter 5
Figure 5. 1 : AAO activated sludge preliminary lab-scale system. 80
Figure 5 .2 : TSS concentration in each zone. 8 1
Figure 5 .3 : Zone VSS/TSS ratio' s during AAO system operation. 82
Figure 5.4: Variation in the SVI and the effluent TSS during AAO
system operation. 82
Figure 5 .5 : Soluble COD concentrations in each zone. 84
Figure 5 .6 : Ammonia concentrations in the aerobic zone and effluent. 85
Figure 5 .7 : Nitrate concentrations in each zone. 85
Figure 5.8: Soluble phosphorus (P04-P) concentration in each zone. 86
Figure 5 .9: P release in anaerobic and anoxic zones based on both
total influent phosphorus and the soluble influent phosphorus. 86
Figure 5 . 1 0: Modified UCT activated sludge lab-scale system for
treatment of synthetic dairy processing wastewater. 90
Figure 5 . 1 1 : TSS concentration in each zone for the MUCT system. 9 1
Figure 5 . 1 2 : COD concentration in each zone for the MUCT system. 92
Figure 5 . 1 3 : Anaerobic zone total and soluble COD consumption. 92
Figure 5 . 1 4 : Ammonia concentration in each zone for the MUCT system. 93
Figure 5 . 1 5 : NOx-N (Nitrate+Nitrite) concentrations in each zone
for the M UCT system. 94
Figure 5. 1 6: Orthophosphate (P04-P) concentrations in each zone
for the MUCT system. 94
Figure 5 . 1 7 : Phosphorus fractionation anaerobic batch test. 96
Xl
Chapter 6
Figure 6 . 1 : Schematic of laboratory treatment system. 99
Figure 6 .2 : Zoned l aboratory-scale activated sludge EBPR
AAO reactor system. 1 00
Figure 6 .3 Influent fermentation system. 1 0 1
Figure 6.4: COD profile during reactor operation in fermenter feed
and fermenter effluent. 1 02
Figure 6 .5 : VF A COD fractionation, total VF A COD and
% acidification of fermenter effluent. 1 02
Figure 6.6 : TSS profile during zoned AAO reactor operation. 1 04
Figure 6 .7 : COD profile during reactor operation in the anaerobic,
anoxic and last aerobic zone. 1 05
Figure 6 .8 : SVI variation during reactor operation. 1 05
Figure 6.9: Effluent nitrate concentrations during the reactor operation. 1 06
Figure 6 . 1 0: Phosphorus concentrations during the reactor operation. 1 07
Figure 6. 1 1 : Sludge phosphorus concentration in the final aerobic zone
during the reactor operation. 1 07
Figure 6. 1 2 : phosphorus removal during the reactor operation,
based on both the fermented effluent total phosphorus (TP)
and soluble phosphorus (P04-P). 1 08
Figure 6. 1 3 : Anaerobic zone PHA, PHB and PHV concentration during
the reactor operation. 1 08
Figure 6. 1 4 : TSS concentration and VSS/TSS ratio for each zone on day 1 58 . 1 1 1
Figure 6 . 1 5 : Soluble COD and P04-P decrease through each zone on day 1 58 . 1 1 1
Figure 6. 1 6 : Net phosphorus uptake in each zone (negative uptake means
phosphorus release). 1 1 2
Figure 6 . 1 7 : Biomass phosphorus content relative to the soluble P04-P
concentration in each zone. 1 1 2
Figure 6. 1 8: Nitrate and nitrite zone concentrations for each zone on day 1 58 . 1 1 3
Figure 6. 1 9 : Total PHA, PHB, PHV and glycogen sludge concentrations. 1 1 3
Figure 6.20: OUR uptake rates (OUR) and specific oxygen uptake rates
(SOUR) in each aerobic zone. 1 1 4
Figure 6.2 1 : Phosphorus release/uptake and acetate uptake during the
XIl
Figure 6.22:
Figure 6.23 :
Figure 6.24 :
Figure 6.25 :
Figure 6.26:
Figure 6.27:
Figure 6.28 :
Figure 6.29:
Figure 6.30:
Figure 6.3 1 :
Figure 6.32 :
Chapter 7
Figure 7 . 1 :
Figure 7.2:
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.4:
Figure 7 .5 :
Figure 7.6:
Figure 7 .7 :
Figure 7 .8 :
batch test with acetate as sole carbon source.
Specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) and phosphorus
during release/uptake during batch test.
VSS/TSS ratio and phosphorus release/uptake during batch test.
Glycogen, sludge phosphorus content and soluble phosphorus
profiles during batch test.
EAAO system TSS concentrations and VSS/TSS ratio profiles.
EAAO system soluble COD and soluble phosphate zone
concentrations.
EAAO system net phosphate uptake profiles (negative uptake
denotes phosphate release).
EAAO system biomass phosphorus content relative to soluble
phosphate concentrations.
EAAO system nitrate and nitrite concentrations.
Extended anaerobic zone system nitrate and nitrite concentrations.
Anaerobic batch test using sludge from EAAO system.
Theoretical phosphorus removed as a function of sludge
phosphorus concentration for individual mixed liquor VSS
concentrations for a reactor at an SRT of days.
Schematic of laboratory treatment system.
Zoned laboratory-scale AO activated sludge EBPR
reactor system.
1 1 6
1 1 8
1 1 8
1 1 9
1 2 1
1 22
1 23
1 23
1 24
1 25
1 28
1 30
1 4 1
1 4 1
F ermenter feed and effluent COD profile during reactor operation 1 43
VF A COD fractionation, total VF A COD and % acidification of
fermenter effluent.
Zone profiles of TSS, VSS and the VSS/TSS ratio for the 10 day SRT AO zoned reactor.
Zone profiles of soluble COD and P04-P for the
1 0 day SRT AO zoned reactor.
1 43
1 45
1 45
P04-P uptake for each zone for the 1 0 day SRT AO zoned reactor. 1 47
Soluble P04-P and sludge phosphorus profiles for each zone
for the 1 0 day SRT AO reactor. 1 48
Xlll
Figure 7 .9 : Zone nitrate concentrations for each zone for
the 1 0 day SRT AO reactor. 1 49
Figure 7 . 1 0 : SOUR and OUR profiles for each zone of 1 0 days AO reactor. 1 49
Figure 7 . 1 1 : Acetate COD and P04-P profiles during the batch test. 1 52
Figure 7. 1 2 : Sludge phosphorus content and VSS/TSS variation during
batch test at 0, 300 and 600 minutes. 1 53
Figure 7. 1 3 : SOUR and OUR profiles during thes batch test aerobic phase. 1 53
Figure 7. 1 4: TSS and VSS/TSS profiles during 1 5 day SRT reactor operation. 1 55
Figure 7. 1 5 : Soluble COD profiles of anaerobic zone and final aerobic zones
for 1 5 day SR T reactor operation. 1 55
Figure 7 . 1 6 : The amount of soluble COD and VF A COD consumed in the
anaerobic zone and the % of the available COD and VF A
consumed within the anaerobic zone for 1 5 day SRT reactor. 1 56
Figure 7. 1 7: SVI variations during the 1 5 day SRT Aa reactor operation. 1 57
Figure 7 . 1 8: Effluent nitrate concentrations during reactor operation
at an S RT of 1 5 days. 1 57
Figure 7 . 1 9: Soluble phosphorus concentrations in the anaerobic zone
and final aerobic zone during 1 5 day SRT reactor operation. 1 58
Figure 7 .20: Sludge phosphorus concentration in the final aerobic zone. 1 59
Figure 7 .2 1 : TSS, VSS and VSS/TS S ratio's for each zone
for 1 5 day AO reactor. 1 60
Figure 7.22: Soluble COD and P04-P profiles for each zone for
1 5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 6 1
Figure 7.23 : Phosphorus uptake in each zone for 1 5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 6 1
Figure 7.24: Sludge phosphorus content and P04-P concentrations for
each zone for the 1 5 day SRT reactor. 1 62
Figure 7.25 : Nitrate concentrations in each zone for the
1 5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 62
Figure 7.26: PHB, PHV, total PHA and glycogen concentrations for each
zone for the 1 5 day SR T AO reactor. 1 63
Figure 7 .27: SOUR and OUR rates for each zone for the 1 5 day
S R T A 0 reactor. 1 64
Figure 7 .28 : Soluble COD and P04-P profiles during batch test for
XIV
15 day SRT reactor. 1 66
Figure 7 .29: S ludge phosphorus content and VSS/TSS variations
during 1 5 day mixed liquor batch test. 1 67
Figure 7.30: PHB, PHV, total PHA, glycogen and SOUR profiles
during batch tests for 1 5 day S RT reactor. 1 68
Figure 7.3 1 : TSS, VSS and VSS/TSS ratio' s for the anaerobic zone
and the final aerobic during the 5 day SRT AO reactor operation. 1 70
Figure 7.32: Soluble COD for the anaerobic zone and the final aerobic
zone during the 5 day SRT AO reactor operation. 1 70
Figure 7 .33 : Total VF A COD concentration in the anaerobic zone, the amount
of VFA COD consumed within the anaerobic zone for 5 day
SRT AO reactor. 1 7 1
Figure 7.34: SVI variation during the operation of the 5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 72
Figure 7 .35 : Anaerobic and aerobic P04-P concentrations and the amount of
Anaerobic zone P-release during the operation of the 5 day
SRT AO reactor. 1 72
Figure 7 .36 : Final aerobic zone sludge phosphorus content during the
operation of the 5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 73
Figure 7 .37 : Final zone nitrate concentration during the operation of the
5 day SRT AO reactor. 1 73
Figure 7.3 8 : TSS, VSS and VSS/TSS ratio in each zone for reactor
operated at an SRT of 5 days. 1 75
Figure 7.39: Soluble COD and P04-P concentration in each zone for AO
Zoned reactor operated at an SRT of 5 days. 1 76
Figure 7.40: Anaerobic zone phosphorus uptake in each zone for AO zoned
Reactor operated an SR T of 5 days. 1 76
Figure 7 .4 1 : Final aerobic zone sludge phosphorus content and P04-P
for zones of AO reactor operated at an SRT of 5 days. 1 77
Figure 7 .42: Nitrate in each zone of AO reactor operated at an SRT of 5 days. 1 75
Figure 7.43: SOUR and OUR zone profiles for AO reactor operated
at an S R T of 5 days. 1 77
F igure 7 .44: Phosphorus release (negative) and uptake (positive) rates for
Each AO system zone study. 1 82
xv
Chapter 8
Figure 8 . 1 :
Figure 8 .2 :
Figure 8 . 3 :
Figure 8 .4:
Figure 8 .5 :
Figure 8 .6 :
Figure 8 .7 :
Figure 8 . 8 :
Figure 8 .9 :
Figure 8 . 1 0 :
Figure 8 . 1 1 :
Chapter 9
Figure 9. 1 :
Figure 9 .2 :
Figure 9.3:
Figure 9.4:
Zone pH values for each zone study.
Soluble calcium values for zones 1 , 5 and 1 0 for the 1 5 day SRT
AO system (the total calcium concentration value in the
effluent is 1 5 .3 mg/L).
Soluble effluent phosphorus concentration over a 34 day period
for an AO configured reactor fed unfermented wastewater.
TSS, VSS and VSS/TSS zone profiles for Aa system treating
unfermented wastewater.
Soluble COD and phosphorus profiles for AO system treating
unfermented wastewater.
Anaerobic zone phosphorus uptake for non-fermented system.
Sludge phosphorus content for each zone.
Zone P HB, PHV and PHA concentrations.
SOUR and OUR respiration rates for each zone.
Soluble COD and P04-P profiles during batch test for
non-fermented system.
Concentrations of magnesium, calcium and potassium for zones
1 , 5 and 1 0 at the time of the 1 5 day Aa system zone study.
The total phosphorus removed in each system at the time
of the zone study.
Total unaerated zone phosphorus release and anaerobic zone only
phosphorus release relative to the unaerated fraction.
The relationship of the soluble COD consumption in the unaerated
zones and overall phosphorus removed relative to the unaerated
zone HRT (actual) for 1 0 day SRT reactors.
The change in Y P04 determined from acetate batch tests relative
1 89
1 89
1 90
1 94
1 93
1 94
1 95
1 95
1 94
1 97
202
2 1 0
2 1 1
2 1 1
to the continuous reactor total soluble consumption in the unaerated
zones. 2 1 3
XVI
Chapter 2
Table 2 . 1 :
Table 2.2 :
Table 2.3 :
Table 2.4:
Table 2 .5 :
Table 2 .6 :
Chapter 3
Table 3 . 1 :
Table 3 .2 :
Table 3 . 3 :
Table 3 .4:
Table 3 . 5 :
Chapter 4 Table 4.1:
Table 4.2:
Table 4 .3 :
Table 4.5
LIST OF TABLES
Precipitation reactions of phosphorus with lime, alum and
iron Fe (III)
Summary of molar ratios during anaerobi c and aerobic periods
for various organic substrates (from Comeau et al. , 1 987).
Ratios of phosphorus released and VF A consumed under
anaerobic conditions (from Abu-gharrarah and Randell, 1991).
Chemical characteristics of whole milk (Danalewich et al., 1998)
Chemical characteristics of dairy processing wastewaters.
A verage values of parameters are given along with either the
range of values or maximum value shown in brackets ( ).
Synthetic wastewater composition and characteristics as used
by Leonard ( 1 996).
Retention times in respective zones of laboratory AAO system.
Hydraulic retention times in respective zones of laboratory
MU CT system.
Synthetic wastewater recipe with COO/TKN ratio of 28 .
Recipe for synthetic wastewater with COD/TKN ratio of 32 .
Milk powder characteristics according to the manufacturer
(Anchor Milk Products Ltd, N .Z.).
Synthetic dairy processing wastewater recipe.
Synthetic dairy processing wastewater chemical and physical
characteristics.
NUR batch test parameters
NUR gradients for each substrate used in the anoxic batch test.
XVll
Page
8
1 6
1 7
25
27
3 1
47
50
58
58
59
6 1
62
68
69
Table 4.6 :
Table 4.7 :
Table 4 .8 :
Chapter 5
Table 5 . 1 :
Table 5 .2 :
Table 5 . 3 :
Table 5 .4 :
Table 5 .5 :
Chapter 6
Table 6. 1 :
Table 6 .2 :
Table 6 .3 :
Table 6.4:
Table 6 .5 :
Table 6.6:
Table 6.7:
Table 6.8 :
NUR gradients for each substrate used in second anoxic batch test. 7 1
RBCOD fraction and yield coefficients from the study
and literature.
Operating parameters and analytical data from the four different
fermenter operations.
Retention time in respective zones oflaboratory AAO system.
A verage analytical parameters for each zone during operation
of AAO lab-scale configuration.
Hydraulic retention times in respective zones of laboratory
MU CT system.
Average analytical parameters for each zone during operation
of MUCT lab-scale configuration.
Phosphorus fractionation of aerobic sludge sample (Day 35) .
Reactor system operational parameters.
Volume, number of individual zones and the HRT in the
anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic steps with the overall HRT.
Fermented wastewater VF A COD concentrations and percent
of total VF A COD and soluble COD« o45�m).
Individual zone parameters for AAO configuration.
Analytical parameters at time 0, 1 80, and 660 minutes for the
batch test for 1 0 day SRT AAO system. Glycogen concentration
is given for 420 minutes instead of 600 minutes.
Individual zone parameters for EAAO configuration.
Anaerobic and anoxic COD and VF A consumption and
phosphorus release values for the single anaerobic zone AAO
system (AAO) and for the extended anaerobic zone AAO system
(EAAO) . Anaerobic/anoxic phase stoichiometric constants from AAO
and EAAO zone studies and for both batch test of mixed liquor.
XVlll
72
76
80
89
90
95
97
99
1 00
1 03
1 1 7
1 1 9
1 26
1 3 1
1 34
Chapter 7
Table 7. 1 :
Table 7 .2 :
Table 7 .3
Table 7 .4 :
Table 7 .5 :
Table 7 .6 :
Table 7 .7 :
Table 7 .8 :
Table 7 .9 :
Table 7. 1 0 :
Table 7 . 1 1 :
Table 7 . 1 2 :
Synthetic dairy processing wastewater recipe used in the AO
zoned reactor studies.
Modified low nitrogen synthetic dairy processing wastewater
chemical and physical characteristics.
AO reactor system operational parameters.
Average fermented wastewater average VFA COD concentrations
and proportions of total VF A and total CODO.45ilm•
Fermenter Effluent and anaerobic zone (zone 1 ) individual short
chain VF A COD concentrations, the % oftotal VF A COD and
the % consumption of anaerobic zone individual VF A
based on fermenter effluent VF A concentrations.
Individual zone paramters for AO configuration at an SRT
of 1 0 days.
Analytical parameters at time 0, 300 and 600 minutes for
batch test using mixed liquor of AO system operated at an
S RT of 1 0 days.
Individual zone parameters for AO configuration at an SRT
of 1 5 days.
Analytical parameters at time 0, 1 80 and 420 minutes for
batch test using mixed liquor of AO system operated at an
SRT of 1 5 days. Except OUR and SOUR are given for 2 1 0
minutes instead of 1 80 minutes.
Individual zone parameters for AO configuration at an SRT
of 5 days.
Summary of anaerobic zone parameters during zone studies,
except for P removed and %mg P/mg VSS that relate to final
aerobic zone (zone 1 0).
Stoichiometric constants from each zone study and batch test
for the AO systems.
XIX
1 39
1 39
1 42
1 44
1 46
1 50
1 54
1 65
1 69
1 79
1 80
1 8 1
Chapter 8
Table 8 . 1 :
Table 8 .2 :
Table 8 .3 :
Table 8 .4 :
Table 8 . 5 :
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Table 1 0. 1 :
Table 1 0.2 :
Table 1 0. 3 :
Table 1 0.4:
Table 1 0.5:
Table 1 0.6 :
Table 1 0.7 :
Table 1 0. 8 :
Table 1 0.9 :
Table 1 0. 1 0:
Table 1 0. 1 1 :
Characteristics of synthetic wastewater immediately before
entry to zoned reactor.
Individual and total VF A concentrations.
Individual zone parameters for non�fermented wastewater
AO configuration at an SRT of 1 0 days.
Analytical parameters at time 0, 240 and 480 minutes for the
batch of the unfermented 1 0 day SRT AO system.
Amount of magnesium, potassium and calcium release in the
anaerobic zone and the ratio of each cation to both phosphorus
release and uptake.
No Tables
Aerobic Readily Biodegradable Test Data, SIX ratio of 0.05
Aerobic Readily Biodegradable Test Data, SIX ratio of 0. 1 2
Anoxic Readily Biodegradable Test (SIX ratio of 0.03)
Anoxic Readily Biodegradable Test (SIX ratio of 0.08)
AAO Continuous Reactor Data - Unfermented Wastewater
MUCT Continuous Reactor Data - Unfermented Wastewater
Zoned AAO System - Fermented Wastewater
AAO Reactor Fermented Wastewater VFA Concentrations
Fermenter Operation during AO System Operation ( 1 5 day SRT)
1 5 Day SRT AO Reactor Operation
5 Day SRT AO Reactor System
xx
1 9 1
1 93
1 98
1 99
202
2 1 6
2 1 7
2 1 7
2 1 8
2 1 9
220
22 1
223
224
224
225
AAO
AO
ASM I
ASM2
BNR
BOD
COD
DO
EBPR
GAO
HRT
MLSS
MLVSS
MUCT
NUR
OUR
P
PAO
PHA
PHB
PHV
RAS
RBCOD
SA
SBCOD
SCVFA
SF
SII
SOUR
SRT
ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE
Anaerobic-Anoxic-Oxic
Anaerobic-Oxic
Activated Sludge Model No. 1
Activated Sludge Model No. 2
Biological Nutrient Removal
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal
Glycogen Accumulating Organisms
Hydraulic Retention Time (d)
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids
Mixed Liquor Volatile Suspended Solids
Modified University of Cape Town
Nitrate Uptake Rate
Oxygen Uptake Rate
Phosphorus
Polyphosphate Accumulating Organisms
Poly-p hydroxyalkanoates
Poly-p hydroxybutyric Acid
Poly-p hydroxyvaleric Acid
Return Activated Sludge
Readily Biodegradable Chemical Oxygen Demand
Fermentation Products as Acetate Equivalents (mg/L)
Slowly Biodegradable Chemical Oxygen Demand
Short Chain Volatile Fatty Acids
Fermentable Readily Biodegradable Substrates (mg/L)
Inert Soluble Substrate (mg/L)
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
Sludge Retention Time (d)
XXI
SSI Readily Biodegradable Substrate (mg/L)
SVI Sludge Volume Index (mllg)
SIX Substrate to Biomass Ratio
TKN Total Kjehldahl Nitrogen (mg/L)
TSS Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)
UCT University of Cape Town
VFA Volatile Fatty Acids
VSS Volatile Suspended Solids (mg/L)
XS1 S lowly Biodegradable Substrate (mg/L)
Y H Heterotrophic Yield Coefficient (mg Cell COD/mg COD consumed)
Y HO Anoxic Yield Coefficient (mg Cell COD/mg COD Consumed)
YP04 Ratio of Phosphorus Released to COD consumed (mg P/mg COD)
XXll