copyright institute for ethics and emerging technologies 2005 emerging biopolitics: transhumanism...

32
Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary, World Transhumanist Association Executive Director, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Lecturer, Public Policy Studies, Trinity College, Hartford CT [email protected] October 24, 2007 Paris, France

Upload: elfreda-paul

Post on 13-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005

Emerging Biopolitics:Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism

James J. Hughes Ph.D.

Secretary, World Transhumanist AssociationExecutive Director, Institute for Ethics and Emerging TechnologiesLecturer, Public Policy Studies, Trinity College, Hartford CT

[email protected]

October 24, 2007 Paris, France

Page 2: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Emerging Technologies

Tech that will radically change the human brain:PsychopharmacologyGenetic engineeringNanotechnologyArtificial intelligenceCognitive science

The accelerating convergence of all these“for improving human performance”

Page 3: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Human Enhancement

Curing disabilitiesHealthLongevity Intelligence Emotional controlAesthetic expressionSpiritual goalsEnsuring the best lives for our kids

Page 4: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Why Human Enhancement?

Status Quo Bias Would it be better to

have….Shorter lives?More disabilities?Less intelligence?Less memory?Less happiness?

Page 5: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Biopolitical Battlefronts

Who is a citizen with a right to life?: abortion, stem cells, great ape rights, brain death, chimeras

Control of Reproduction: contraception, abortion, fertility treatments, genetic testing, germline gene therapies, cloning

Fixing Disabilities to “Human Enhancement”: cochlear implants, prosthetics, eye and brain chips, gene therapies, cosmetic procedures

Extending Life: from treatments for aging-related diseases, to anti-aging drugs and therapies

Control of the Brain: Ritalin and Prozac, psychoactive drugs, brain chips

Page 6: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

20th Century Politics

Progressives

Conservatives

Conservatives Progressives

Populists

Libertarians New Right

Social Democrats

Cultural Politics

Economic Politics

Populists

Libertarians New Right

Social Democrats

Page 7: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

21st Century Politics

Economic Politics

Biopolitics

Progressive

Conservative

Progressive Conservative Cultural Politics

Bioconservatism

Transhumanism

Page 8: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

BioConservatives

Religious Right

CS Lewis The Abolition of Man

Deep Ecologists, Romantic Luddites

Aldous Huxley Brave New World

Jeremy Rifkin Algeny

Left-wing/Feminist Critics of Biotech Gena Corea The Mother Machine

Center for Genetics and Society

Pro-Disability Extremists Not Dead Yet

Page 9: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

What is Transhumanism?

An intellectual and cultural movement that affirms

the possibility and desirability of transcending the limitations of the human body through applied reason

especially by using technology to eliminate aging and enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities.

Trans-humanists are humanists who emphasize what we have the potential to become through reason.

Page 10: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Diderot – “D'Alembert's Dream” 1769

Mind is not separate from the body/brain

Lower animals are evolving towards intelligence

Machine minds are possible

The self is a fictional aggregate of multiple wills

Minds may be deconstructed and rebuilt later

Science can bring the dead back to life

Human-animal hybrids OK

Sexual freedom OK, including homosexuality

Denis Diderot 1713-1784

Page 11: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Marquis de Condorcet 1744-1794

Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind

Reason liberates from church, authoritarianism, nature

Women’s suffrage Opposed to slavery Radical life extension Freedom from work

Marquis de Condorcet

Page 12: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Condorcet’s Transhumanism

"Nature has set no term to the perfection of human faculties; the perfectibility of man is truly indefinite; and the progress of this perfectibility, from now onwards independent of any power that might wish to halt it, has no other limit than the duration of the globe upon which nature has cast us."

Page 13: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

H+ Regiment of the Enlightenment

Page 14: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Other Proto-Transhumanists

HG Wells and Olaf Stapledon(socialists) – portrayed future evolution of humanity

JBS Haldane (Marxist), 1923, "Daedalus: Science and the Future“ – in vitro fertilization, genetic engineering

JD Bernal (Marxist), 1929, "The World, the Flesh and the Devil” – first projection of cybernetic implants

JBS Haldane

Page 15: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

“Trans-humanism” and “Transhuman-ism”

Julian Huxley (left humanist) first director of UNESCO "Transhumanism“ "the human species can transcend itself."

“FM-2030” (left “upwinger”) popularized term “transhuman” in the 1970s

Page 16: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Haraway’s Cyborg Manifesto

Donna Haraway (socialist feminist)

A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century (1985)

“I’d rather be a Cyborg than a goddess”

Response to eco-feminist essentialism

Page 17: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Five Key Contemporary H+ Values

Pro-Enhancement Technologies

Humanism & Secularism

Scientific & Technological Optimism

Personhood Ethics

Repro Rights, Cog Liberty, Body Autonomy

In 2004 Francis Fukuyama declared transhumanism “the most dangerous idea in the world.”

Page 18: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Growing H+ Movement

World Transhumanist Associationtranshumanism.org

30 chapters, 5000 members

Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

ieet.org

Dr. Nick Bostrom Oxford UniversityWTA & IEET Chair

Page 19: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Growing Diversity of H+

From the March 2005 survey of WTA members

Religion

Religious or spiritual

Secular, atheist

Other/DK

Atheist, Agnostic, Secular humanist 63%

Spiritual, Buddhist, Protestant, Religious

humanist, Catholic, Pagan, Unitarian-

Universalist, Hindu etc.

25%

Other 13%

Page 20: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Technoprogressivism

Core Ideas: Equality and solidarity, as well as

liberty

Tech needs regulation and universal access

“Techno-Progressives”

Technoliberation list on Yahoo Groups

Institute for Ethics & Emerging Technologies ieet.org

Page 21: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Biopolitical Coalitions

H+ Coalition BioCon Coalition

A-TechnoprogressivesB-Libertarian transhumanists

Economic Politics

Biopolitics

Progressive

Conservative

C

A

Progressive Conservative

B

D

Cultural Politics

Bioconservatism

Transhumanism

C-Left bioconservativesD-Right bioconservatives

Page 22: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Transhumanists BioConservativesPersonhood, cyborg citizenship

Human-Racism (or Deep ecology)

Humanism, reason, individual liberty, progress

Sacred taboos, “the natural”, yuck factor, romanticism

Risks are manageable Risks are unknowable; Punishment for hubris inevitable; Tech should be banned

Central Biopolitical Disputes

Page 23: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Beyond Human-racism…

Human-racism = Humanness as basis of rights-bearing

Humans have souls or crypto-spiritual “human dignity”

Fetus to cremation

Embryonic citizens?

Page 24: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

…to Personhood

Persons: “conscious beings, aware of themselves, with intents and purposes over time”

You can be human and not persons: fetus, braindead

You can be a person and not human: great apes, AI, posthumans

Page 25: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

H+ = Radical Human Rights

Personhood, not race, gender or species, defines citizenship

Citizens have a right to control own bodies, brains & reproduction

Goal of governance should be to help each person fulfill her potential John Locke

1632-1704

Page 26: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Technological Self-Determination

The right to know how safe and effective technologies are

The right to use technology to control our own bodies and minds

The right of equal access to technological empowerment

Page 27: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Legitimate Risk Concerns: Safety, Efficacy, Equity

Ensure technology is safe and effective

Make tech accessible to all

Page 28: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Yuck Factor Stops Critical Thinking

Bioconservative risk estimates are grounded in yuck factor so that tech bans seem only logical policy

Page 29: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Pursue Universal Access

Defend & expand universal health care

Expand access in the developing worldAnti-retroviral drugs

Page 30: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Secure the “Longevity Dividend”

Multi-national Manhattan project on anti-aging

Aubrey de Grey Jay Olshansky

Page 31: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

Tech is not the problem Greed, racism, inequality,

patriarchy, authoritarianism,

ignorance and superstition

are the problems

Technology only opens new

battlefronts to pursue reason,

democracy, equality, and liberty

The Crossbow was invented to oppress peasants. But it became the perfect tool for knocking knights off horses.

Page 32: Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2005 Emerging Biopolitics: Transhumanism vs. Bioconservatism James J. Hughes Ph.D. Secretary,

Copyright Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 2006

For more information

World Transhumanist Associationtranshumanism.org

Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologiesieet.org

Me: [email protected]@ieet.org