copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, pearson education, inc. chapter 10 comparing two groups section...

9

Upload: philippa-richard

Post on 02-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables
Page 2: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 10Comparing Two Groups

Section 10.5

Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Page 3: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.3

When we find a practically significant difference between two groups, can we identify a reason for the difference?

Warning: An association may be due to a lurking variable not measured in the study.

To investigate why differences occur between groups, we must measure potential lurking variables and use them in the statistical analysis.

A Practically Significant Difference

Page 4: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.4

In a previous example, we saw that teenagers who watch more TV have a tendency later in life to commit more aggressive acts.

Could there be a lurking variable that influences this association?

Perhaps teenagers who watch more TV tend to attain lower educational levels and perhaps lower education tends to be associated with higher levels of aggression.

Control Variable

Page 5: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.5

We need to measure potential lurking variables and use them in the statistical analysis.

If we thought that education was a potential lurking variable we would want to measure it.

Including a potential lurking variable in the study changes it from a bivariate study to a multivariate study.

A variable that is held constant in a multivariate analysis is called a control variable.

Control Variable

Page 6: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.6

Table 10.15 Percentage Committing Aggressive Acts, According to Level ofTeenage TV Watching, Controlling for Educational Level. For example, for those who attended college who watched TV less than 1 hour per day, 2% committed an aggressive act.

Control Variable

Page 7: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.7

This analysis uses three variables: Level of TV watching Committing of aggressive acts Educational level (control variable)

A control variable is a variable that is held constant in a multivariate analysis.

Table 10.15 treats educational level as a control variable. Within each of the three education groups, educational level is approximately constant.

Control Variable

Page 8: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.8

To analyze whether an association can be explained by a third variable, we:

treat the third variable as a control variable. conduct the ordinary bivariate analysis while

holding that control variable constant at fixed values (multivariate analysis).

Then, whatever association occurs cannot be due to effects of the control variable, because in each part of the analysis it is not allowed to vary.

Statistical Control: Can An Association Be Explained by a Third Variable?

Page 9: Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.5 Adjusting for the Effects of Other Variables

Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc.9

At each educational level, the percentage committing an aggressive act is higher for those who watched more TV.

For this hypothetical data, the association observed between TV watching and aggressive acts was not because of education.

Statistical Control: Can An Association Be Explained by a Third Variable?