order copies of petition on all respondents in the matter and report its compliance to the 2 sub: in...

1

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BHOPAL

Sub: In the matter of application for approval of Capital Investment Plan for Transmission works during the period from FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22.

ORDER (Date of Order: 02nd May ’ 2018)

Petition No. 33/2017

M.P. Power Transmission Company Ltd., Jabalpur Blok No. 2, Shakti Bhawan, Rampur, Jabalpur – 482008 - Petitioner

V/s

1. M.P. Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd., Block No. 7, Shakti Bhawan, Rampur, Jabalpur – 482008

2. M.P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd.,

Nishtha Parisar, Govindpura, Bhopal – 462023 3. M.P. Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd., GPH Compound, Pologround, Indore - Respondents 4. M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam, Indore (SEZ),

Free Press House, 1st Floor, 3/54, Press Complex, A.B. Road, Indore – 452 008

5. Indian Railways through West Central Railways, Jabalpur

General Manager’s Office, Electrical Department, Jabalpur- 482001

Shri Ashish Bernard Dy. Advocate General, Shri Anand Tiwari SE and Shri Vincent D’ Souza

SE (CRA) appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

Shri Rajiv Kumar Gupta Sr .General manager and Shri A.S. Raghuwanshi Dy. General Manager

appeared on behalf of MPPMCL.

None appeared on behalf of other Respondents.

M.P. Power Transmission Co. Ltd., Jabalpur (MPPTCL) has filed the subject petition for

approval of its Capital Investment Plan for Transmission works during FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22

in terms of “Guidelines for capital expenditure by licensees in Madhya Pradesh” issued by the

Commission.

2. The petition was admitted on 26th September’ 2017 and the petitioner was directed to

serve copies of petition on all Respondents in the matter and report its compliance to the

2


Commission. The Respondents were directed to file their response on the petition by 23rd October’

2017.

3. MPPTCL has broadly submitted the following in its subject petition:

(i) Background:

The Commission issued MYT order for the control period FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19 on 10-06-

2016. The first year of the control period, i.e. FY 2016-17 was covered under the 12th Five Year

Plan period and the remaining two years fall under the ambit of the forthcoming 13th Five

Year Plan. The works envisaged to be completed in the MYT Control Period FY 2016-17 to FY

2018-19 and incorporated in the MYT petition for the said Control Period, have been included

in the 13th Five-Year Plan, also.

(ii) The 12th Plan had to be suitably downsized after yearly reviews, and finally the achievements

are estimated as Rs. 5172.41 Crores at the end of 12th Plan period i.e. 31.03.2017. The main

reasons for this are;

(a) The power evacuation works for evacuating the power from the proposed Dada

Dhuniwale Thermal Power Project(2x800 MW) and NHDC’s Reva TPS(2x660 MW) had

to be deleted on account of cancellation of these two generation projects. This was

necessary to avert the idling of transmission assets and associated costs.

(b) Cancellation of major turn-key contracts due to delays/performance default by turn-

key contractor(s)

(c) Deferment of downstream works due to deferment commissioning of generating

stations .

(d) Payments for turn-key contracts are released only after 100 % completion of the turn-

key contracts, thus lesser expenditure get reflected in the account statements.

The resources utilized during 12th Plan are indicated, as follows: 1 ADB Financed Works (ADB-II) Rs. 119.26 Crs. 2 ADB Financed Works (ADB-III) Rs. 705.56 Crs. 3 PFC Financed Works (IInd Scheme) Rs.1285.22 Crs. 4 PFC Financed Works (IIIrd Scheme) Rs. 316.22 Crs. 5 JICA Financed Works Rs.1363.27 Crs. 6 ADB-III SAVING Financed Works Rs. 86.10 Crs. 7 REC Financed Works (REC-I Scheme) Rs. 331.07 Crs. 8 Government / Equity support Rs. 625.71 Crs. 9 Transmission Works under PPP Mode Rs.340.00 Crs.

10 TOTAL - Rs. 5172.41 Crs.

3


(iii) Process for development of proposed Capital Investment Plan for 13th Plan Period:

MPPTCL has submitted that the 13th Plan under proposal has been developed under the

following process:

(a) To develop a need based Plan, system studies are carried out to identify the need of

system strengthening, keeping in view the scenario of availability of additional power

and load growth.

(b) For formulation of Transmission Plan for FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22, in-house studies

have been carried out by the petitioner MPPTCL.

(c) The work of system studies for reduction in transmission losses to match with MPERC

targets was entrusted to the Electrical Research & Development Association (ERDA),

Vadodara (Guj.).

(d) The system studies for loss reduction have been conducted by M/s ERDA in scenario

years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 and 2017-18 to 2021-22.

(e) The study mainly comprises of :

(i) Data of existing and proposed Generating Units & power allocation from

outside the State Generators.

(ii) EHV Sub-station details, present loading of active & reactive power.

(iii) Reactive compensation devices in the system.

(iv) Voltage conditions.

(v) Fault level considerations.

Studies are conducted in contingency conditions for transient analysis, temporary over

voltage.

(f) Based on the results of the studies, new works are identified i.e.;

(i) The new 400 KV, 220 KV and 132 KV lines required.

(ii) Second circuiting of existing S.C. lines.

(iii) LILO arrangements for interconnection to EHV Sub-stations.

(iv) 400 KV, 220 KV and 132 KV new Sub-stations required.

(v) Additional transformers required in Sub-stations.

(vi) Augmentation of existing transformers.

4


The final system study reports have been submitted by the Consultants, M/s ERDA,

Vadodara.

(g) In compliance of the Guidelines for Capital Expenditure circulated by the

Commission vide No. MPERC/2005/DD(TR)/1722 dated 19.07.2005, the details in

Annexure-2 of the guidelines have been prepared for each and every work to be taken

up during FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22. The discounted cash flow is projected for next 25

years and it is ensured that the payback falls within this period.

The work-wise details of financial analysis, containing Annexure-2 of guidelines for all

new works to be taken up with value above 5.00 Crores , are filed with this Petition as

Annexure-A .

(h) Based on the studies and financial analysis as mentioned in preceding paras, need

based plan has been chalked out by MPPTCL for the next 5 years.

(iv) Physical and Financial plan proposed for FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22 :

MPPTCL has submitted the Physical & Financial Plan for FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22. The

proposed plan includes Normal Plan for MPPTCL & Green Energy Corridor Project also as

given below:

Physical works proposed under 13th Plan Period:

S. No

Particulars 13th Plan (17-22) YEARWISE PHYSICAL PROGRAMME

TOTAL 13th PLAN (2017-22)

(Need Based)

2017-18

(Anticipated)

2018-19

(Need Based)

2019-20

(Need Based)

2020-21

(Need Based)

2021-22

(Need Based)

A EHV LINES (CIRCUIT KMS) 1 400KV Lines 0.0 457 690 10 0 1157

2 220KV Lines 482 211 1124 864 180 2861

3 132KV Lines 829 720 1965 562 275 4351

TOTAL CKT KMS 1311 1387 3779 1436 455 8368

B EHV SUB-STATIONS (MVA)

1 400KV Substations 630.0 830.0 1890.0 630.0 0.0 3980.0

2 220KV Substations 800.0 1200.0 2340.0 2170.0 960.0 7470.0

3 132KV Substations 1029.5 2050.0 2078.0 593.0 713.0 6463.5

TOTAL MVA 2459.5 4080.0 6308.0 3393.0 1673.0 17913.5

5


EHV SUB-STATIONS (Nos)

1 400KV Substations 0 2 3 0 0 5

2 220KV Substations 3 2 10 5 1 21

3 132KV Substations 9 15 21 8 7 60

TOTAL (Nos) 12 19 34 13 8 86

Financial Investment proposed under 13th Plan Period:

S. No

Particulars YEARWISE INVESTMENT IN THIRTEENTH PLAN (2017-22) (Rs in Lakhs)

TOTAL 13th PLAN (2017-22)

(Need Based)

2017-18 (Need based)


2019-20

(Need based)



1 400KV Lines 17649 37548 52144 30100 21637 159078 2 220KV Lines 32172 36287 30063 22885 14414 135821 3 132KV Lines 33587 41851 35325 28591 29921 169275 TOTAL (LINES) 83408 115686 117532 81576 65972 464174

4 400KV Substations

19402 24003 25893 6478 7408 83184

5 220KV Substations

20517 19734 27956 23200 17727 119134

6 132KV Substations

26649 33957 32633 37758 28183 159181

7 Misc. Works 9870 12422 15654 61485 83813 163243 TOTAL

(SUBSTATIONS) 76438 100115 102136 128921 117132 524742

G. TOTAL (i+ii) 159846 215801 219669 210497 183103 988915

(v) Financial resources to execute the Plan:

After finalizing the works to be taken up during the plan period and assessment of financial

need, efforts are made to find out the financial resources which may be available and agencies

to execute the works. The process of getting the financial linkage is a continuous one, and at

the time of formulation of 5 year plan, the financial linkage for later years, say 4th & 5th years,

may not be frozen, beforehand. Financial linkage for these works may be firmed up in

subsequent years.

6


(vi) The works are proposed to be taken up under the following modes;

S. No.

Particulars Financial Resources Plan Expenditure (Rs.

In Lacs) 1. Works to be

taken up by MPPTCL for which financial linkage is done

(i). ADB financed works (Ongoing ADB-III Scheme) 93861 (ii). PFC financed works (Ongoing PFC-II/Saving Scheme)

12207

(iii).PFC financed works (Ongoing PFC-III Scheme) 20517 (iv). JICA financed works(Ongoing JICA Scheme) 19977 (v). ADB financed works (Ongoing ADB-III Saving ) 83708 (vi). REC financed works (Ongoing REC –I) 21137 (vii). JICA financed works (JICA-II Scheme) 118452 (viii). PSDF Grant 10264 (ix).Unfunded works – Priority -I 131581 (x). Unfunded Works – Priority-II 213071

TOTAL - 696411 3. Other Works to

be taken up by MPPTCL which are yet to be tied up with financial institutions

(xii) Probable institutions are Banks, and other financial institutions with equity support and internal resources

60945

4. Total Plan (Normal Dev.)

- 785719

(xiii). KfW financed works (Green Energy Corridor GEC-I Scheme)

203196

Grand Total - 988915 (vii) Financial Institutions and resources to fund the Plan:

The following are the major institutions from where loan assistance and equity support is

available or expected for the 13th Five -year Plan.

(a) Asian Development bank(ADB) -

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) had sanctioned a loan (ADB-III loan) of Rs. 1250 Crs. for

M. P. Transmission system strengthening project(Estt. project cost Rs. 1786 Crs.) for

implementation during the 12th and 13th Plans. The major works to be carried out under this

project include 2155 Ckt. Kms. of transmission lines and 39 nos. new EHV S/s. The total

estimated investment required for these works during the 13th Plan will be Rs. 1775.69 Crs.,

which includes works to be executed under the cost savings from the ADB-III project loan.

7


(b) Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA):

The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), formerly known as Japan Bank of

International Cooperation (JBIC), is funding power projects in underdeveloped and developing

countries for upliftment of the society in these countries. JICA has sanctioned two loans of Rs.

1038 Crs. (JICA-I) and Rs. 840 Crs.(JICA-II) for M.P. transmission system projects having

project costs of Rs. 1248 Crs. and 1200 Crs., respectively. The total estimated fund requirement

for execution of works under the two JICA-assisted projects during the 13 th Plan is Rs.1384.29

Crs. The salient transmission works to be carried out under the two JICA assisted projects

during the 13th Plan are –

JICA-I Loan- EHV lines – 667 Ckt. Kms.; new EHV sub-stations- 1 no.

JICA-II Loan- EHV lines-1125 CKt. Kms.; new EHV sub-stations – 17 nos.

(c) Power Finance Corporation (PFC):

Power Finance Corporation, established by Government of India in 1986 as a developmental

Financial Institution for the power sector had sanctioned loans PFC-II (Saving) (Rs. 221.85

Crs.) and PFC-III(Rs. 492.42 Crs.) . Under these two PFC loans, the ongoing spill-over works

include 493 Ckt. Kms of transmission lines and 4 nos. new EHV S/s. The total estimated fund

requirement for these PFC-assisted transmission projects during the 13th Plan will be Rs.

327.24 Crs.

(d) R.E.C. Ltd.-

The Rural Electrification Corporation (R.E.C.) Ltd., New Delhi has also sanctioned loans for

strengthening of transmission infrastructure in M.P. The loan assistance from REC is for an

amount of Rs. 411 Crs. out of a total project cost of Rs. 587 Crs. . The salient works to be

executed under the ongoing REC-assisted project during the 13th Plan are 56 Ckt.-Kms of

transmission lines, 2 nos. new EHV sub-stations and 10 nos. additional transformers at EHV

sub-stations. The estimated fund requirement for completion of the ongoing works during the

13th Plan is Rs. 211.37 Crs.

(e) KfW Bank, Germany:

MPPTCL has undertaken Green Energy Corridor Project(GEC Project-Phase I) for setting up

evacuation system required to integrate Renewable Energy sources coming up in M.P., having

an aggregate capacity of 4100 MW, with the intra-state & inter-state transmission systems.

The total project cost is Rs. 2100 Crs.. The KfW Bank, Germany has sanctioned a loan of Rs.

840 Crs. and Govt. of India has sanctioned a grant of Rs. 840 Crs. for implementation of this

project, while balance amount of Rs. 420 Crs. shall be provided by Govt. M.P. The major works

envisaged under this project are construction of 2842 Ckt. Kms. of transmission lines and

8


creation of 12 nos. new EHV sub-stations. The estimated fund requirement for this project

during the 13th Plan will be Rs. 2032 Crs.

(f) Equity support by State Government:

Equity support will be provided by the State Government to supplement loan assistance. A few

works may also be taken up purely with the State Government support (i.e. 100 %), on the

basis of priorities. Apart from equity support from the GOMP, certain grants are also given by

Govt. of India as per their policies and initiatives (e.g. Rs. 840 Crs. grant under Green Energy

Corridor project).

(g) Funds yet to be tied up :

The remaining works, with an aggregate estimated cost of Rs. 4055.97 Crores for

strengthening, upgrading and modernizing MP transmission system are still to be tied-up for

firm financial assistance. Efforts are being made to get financial assistance from Banks and

other institutions. The required fund provisions indicated include a small quantum (Rs. 150

Crs.) attributable to unforeseen miscellaneous works which are not identifiable beforehand.

These works, in due course, may include a small number of new EHV sub-stations, works for

sub-station capacity enhancement through additional transformers or replacement of existing

ones, feeder bay works at sub-stations, small interlinking works through loop-in-loop-

out(LILO) or tapping of transmission lines, some modification/ up-gradation / renovation/

modernization works etc.. These works will be executed, in due course as the needs arise, after

freezing the requisite financial linkage/resources.

(h) Internal Resources :

It is expected that MPPTCL will start earning surplus in this Plan period which may be utilized

to supplement the available Plan funds to some extent.”

4. MPPTCL has submitted the following documents with the subject petition.

(i) Financial Analysis for Transmission projects under Plan- Annexure A.

(ii) Work-wise and Year-wise details of works under Plan.- Annexure B

(iii) Copy of System Study Report by M/s ERDA, Vadodara.

5. MPPTCL has submitted that the Transmission Plan is linked to the generating capacity

addition. The Plan is subject to change in case of slippage of commissioning schedule of the

9


Generating Stations and RE generators, and availability of financial resources. MPPTCL has further

submitted that such changes shall be brought to the notice of Commission during subsequent

annual reviews of the Plan, which Commission may kindly consider, in due course.

6. With the above submission, MPPTCL has prayed the following:

(a) “Accord approval to the Transmission Investment Plan amounting to Rs. 9889.15

Crores for the 13th Plan period, FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22, as per details submitted in

the instant petition.

(b) Condone any inadvertent omissions / errors / short comings and permit the Petitioner

to add/ change/ modify/ alter this filing and make further submission as may be

required at a later stage.

(c) Pass such order as Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper and necessary in the

facts and circumstances of the case to grant relief to the petitioner.”

7. The Capital Investment Plan for Transmission works under previous 12th Plan period

during FY 2012-13 to FY 2016-17 was approved vide Commission’s order dated 10th July’ 2012 in

Petition No. 67/2011. The subject petition has been filed for approval of CAPEX plan for next plan

period i.e. 13th Plan in terms of “Guidelines for capital expenditure by licensees in Madhya

Pradesh” issued by this Commission. Therefore, the following provisions under “Guidelines for

capital expenditure by licensees in Madhya Pradesh” notified by the Commission are referred for

examination of the proposal under subject petition:

(a) Clauses 1.5,1.6,1.7.1.15 and 1.22 of the above mentioned guidelines provides that:

“1.5 The Commission shall hold the public hearing on the petition on Capital

Investment Plan and related issues such as past achievements and cost overruns

in any, cost estimation, technical feasibility, financial benefits and its analyses etc.

1.6 Along with the petition for approval of investment, the following documents need

to be filed:

(a) Brief outline of the project, its salient features (including whether this is a

new/ augmentation/ renovation and modernisation project) such as

scope and objectives of this investment, technical reports, design criteria,

project financing avenues, contractor/supplier quotations, etc.,

(b) Details and cost estimates of components amenable to physical

verification along with the provision of price escalation, if any.

10


(c) Detailed justification of the investment in light of existing operating

conditions such as the equipment is operating close to or above their rated

capacity, to facilitate the back up system in conditions of exigency or

during maintenance, to cater the normal load growth, the equipment has

outlived its life, introduction of new and advance technology, etc.

1.7 The licensee shall satisfy the Commission that it has examined the economic,

technical, financial and environmental aspects of all available reasonable options

to meet the energy requirements of the consumers in its area of supply. This

should be supported by a comprehensive cost benefit analysis.

1.15 The Commission’s approval shall be only in principle on the financing package and the change in terms and conditions as approved by the Commission shall be allowed only when the licensee justifies the financing costs in the licensee’s revenue requirement in future years against Commission’s in principle approval of capital expenditure program. (Emphasis Supplied)

1.22 MPPTCL shall carry out annual planning process corresponding to a 5 year

forward term for identification of major works and capital expenditure required

for the State Transmission System which shall be consistent with the National

Power plan formulated by Central Government, any long term plan developed by

CEA and the 5 year plan prepared by Central Transmission Utility.”

8. On preliminary scrutiny of the subject petition, the observations of the Commission were

communicated to the petitioner vide Commission’s letter No. 1390 dated 29th September’ 2017

seeking its reply/ clarification by 16th October’ 2017 and the case was fixed for hearing on 24th

October’ 2017

9. Vide letter No. 2567 dated 11th October’ 2017, MPPTCL confirmed the service of the copy

of petition to all the respondents in the matter. MPPTCL had sought two weeks’ additional time to

file its reply to the observations raised by the commission. Vide daily order dated 24th October’

2017, MPPTCL was directed to file its reply by 15th November’ 2017.

11


10. Vide No. 04-01/C.E.(P&D)/Pet 33 of 2017-MPERC/2891dated 16th November’ 2017,

MPPTCL filed its reply to the observations communicated to it by the Commission. The petitioner

i.e. MPPTCL broadly submitted the following response on the observations of the Commission:

(i) Issue: How the various provisions of “Guidelines Capital Expenditure by the Licensees

in Madhya Pradesh” are fulfilled in the proposed Capital Investment Plan.

Response: “The petitioner, MPPTCL has taken cognizance of the “Guidelines for Capital

Expenditure by the Licensees in Madhya Pradesh” issued by Hon’ble Commission. Although,

Hon’ble Commission has not sought reply regarding compliance of any specific provisions in the

“Guidelines”, it is to confirm, that, MPPTCL has not deviated from any of the provisions made

therein. However, observance of salient aspects of the “Guidelines” is outlined, hereunder:

(a) Need for investment in Transmission: Investment in Transmission is primarily needed to

create the evacuation system on the upstream side for conventional and renewable energy

sources anticipated to come up during the Plan period and beyond, apart from the

anticipated growth in load and demand of power/energy in the downstream networks

feeding the ultimate consumers of the distribution companies. The anticipated growth is

forecast on the basis of historical data and the relevant projections in the All India 18th and

19th Electric Power surveys conducted by C.E.A. The need for investment in Transmission

has been detailed in the System Study Reports( 2017-18 to 2021-22) of consultants M/s

ERDA, Vadodara and summarized in the Executive Summary. Copies of the Executive

Summary and System Study Reports have been furnished along with the petition.

(b) Outline of Projects: The projects/works, envisaged to be implemented under the Capital

Investment Plan, are listed out in the Annexure-B submitted with the petition, including the

estimated cost of the individual works, main financing source, year-wise phasing of

expenditure envisaged etc. The specifications, design and construction of the assets are as

per the relevant IS/IEC codes of standard, C.E.A.’s guidelines/ criteria for transmission

planning, statutory requirements, codes and regulations.

(c) Works worth Rs. 5.00 Crs. or more to be covered: All the transmission works of capital

nature envisaged during the 13th Plan period have been included in the petition without

any ceiling for seeking approval of Hon’ble Commission.

12


(d) Financial Analysis(Annexure-2): Financial Analysis for all the individual works included in

the Capital Investment Plan has been furnished along with the petition as per the

Annexure-2 prescribed in the “Guidelines”. The Financial analysis has been carried out for a

normative time horizon of 35 years (i.e. useful service life), taking into account the interest

& depreciation, principal loan repayment, interest on working capital, normative O&M

charges, Return on Equity(RoE), discounting factor etc. , and, using the discounted cash

flow method to demonstrate the financial viability and net positive returns. Annexure-I is

required to be furnished during the annual reviews, hence, is not filed with the instant

petition.

(e) Upstream and downstream arrangements: The transmission plan, in principle, is envisaged

to be formulated and implemented according to the upstream and downstream

arrangements and requirements. The justifications in this regard, line diagrams and

connectivity with the upstream and downstream systems are included in the respective

year-wise system Study Reports prepared by consultants M/s ERDA, Vadodara.

(f) Least Cost Analysis: In general, the transmission works under the Capital Investment Plan

are envisaged with the objectives of meeting the requirements of power evacuation and

load growth for a given time horizon, under the rigorous constraints of transmission

planning criteria prescribed by C.E.A., mandatory codes & regulations, applicable standards

apart from technical feasibility, RoW/space constraints and conditions in the field. The

feasible alternatives available for cost comparison are very few because various constraints

and limiting factors narrow down the choices and mostly leave a single feasible alternative

in the end. Therefore, in the already extensively developed transmission system of M.P.,

scope for least cost-analysis related to capital investment seems insignificant.

(g) Planned/Scheduled commissioning: The schedule of physical execution envisaged and the

phased requirement of funds is indicated for each work included in the Investment Plan, in

the Annexure-B submitted with the petition.

(h) Observance of Grid Code : The Load Flow Simulation/Study for various scenarios envisaged

during the 13th Plan period , take into account all the relevant stipulations and

requirements of the Grid Code and other Regulations.

(i) Load Flow Studies : As already mentioned in the petition and in the instant reply before,

Load Flow Studies have been carried out by consultants M/s ERDA, Vadodara. Hard and

soft copies of the Executive Summary and year-wise reports for FY 2017-18 through FY

2021-22 have been furnished along with the petition. The salient analyses carried out by

the consultants M/s ERDA, include:

13


Load flow simulation - Peak / off-peak load scenarios

Contingency Analysis

Short Circuit studies (for fault level)

Transient stability studies

Transient/switching over-voltage studies”

(ii) Issue- The implications of the proposed plan on various tariff related issues like

Interest and Finance cost, depreciation, O&M , RoE on the ARR during the plan period

was sought from MPPTCL.

Response : “With regard to the observations made by Hon’ble Commission regarding

implications of the proposed Plan on various Tariff related issues, a statement in tabular form

covering the various factors/heads under the ambit of a Cost Plus Tariff Model, for the 13th Five

Year Plan period has been prepared and submitted as Annexure-I, appended to this reply.

On perusal of Annexure-I, it may kindly be perceived from the projections, that, while there is

around 9% to 12% growth in ARR amount over the period of Plan, simultaneously, there is also

8% to 14% growth in projected Transmission capacity (vis-a-vis the Generation capacity

anticipated, and proposed to be added, by MPPMCL at MP periphery). The average of year-on-

year % growth rates in per MW per Day Transmission charges over the plan period comes out

to be a mere 1.6%. At the same time, the CAGR for per MW/Day Transmission charges for the

plan period comes to be around 1.87% only.

Thus, on the whole, it may be safely inferred that the impact of expenses arising out of Capital

Investment Plan in question is quite reasonable and limited.”

(iii) Issue: The details of technical feasibility studies carried out (if any) by the petitioner

along with the required cost-benefit analysis and pay-back period of the proposed

plan was sought from MPPTCL.

Response : “The investment plan is formulated, primarily, on the basis of need-based

requirements to cater to the prospective generation projects on the upstream side and forecast

of load growth on the downstream side. Creation of evacuation links on the upstream side,

strengthening and capacity addition on the downstream side are statutory obligations and

14


inevitable for the petitioner as a Transmission Licensee. However, appropriate simulation

studies for various realistic scenarios envisaged are carried out to meet the constraints

mentioned in the reply to the foregoing observation (ii) under the sub-heading “’Least Cost

Analysis”. All the works/projects are proposed only after carrying out prudent on-field

assessments and preliminary surveys. The implementation plan is prepared with an optimistic

perspective to overcome the unforeseen hurdles as they come along during the implementation

process. As per the accepted “prudent cost plus” business model for a transmission licensee, the

cost-benefit analysis has been carried out using the discounted cash-flow method for a time

horizon of 35 years for all the works envisaged in the Investment Plan to show the financial

viability and revenue surplus generated . The cost-benefit analysis is shown in the Annexure-A

submitted with the petition.”

(iv) Issue: Details/documents regarding environmental and other necessary approvals, if

any, from all the statutory bodies for all these schemes were sought from MPPTCL.

Response:- “The necessary approval from competent authorities of Statutory bodies are

obtained (in due course) prior to start of execution of the works. Therefore, such approvals,

which may be quite voluminous in content, shall be submitted before the Hon’ble Commission as

and when the same are obtained”.

(v) Issue: Works of Rs. 480 Crs. are planned to be taken up under Public Private

Partnership (PPP Mode). The modalities, if any framed by the petitioner so far for this

work in light of legal provisions under the Act or any documents guidelines issued by

CEA/MoP was sought from MPPTCL.

Response: “There is no work of Rs. 480 Crs. through Public Private Partnership (PPP) mode

included in the proposed Investment Plan for the 13th plan period. Instead, work of 400 KV

double-ckt. transmission link (Ckt. Length- 480 Ckt.-kms) from Sarni to Ashta for evacuation of

power from the 2x250 MW Satpura Thermal Power(Extn.) Project, Sarni has been shown as

completed during the 12th plan period. M/s Kalptaru had been selected, through bidding, as the

concessionaire for this PPP-mode project. The matters regarding granting of licence to M/s

Kalptaru and determination of Tariff(unitary charges) and other modalities connected to this

PPP project had been dealt with and disposed of by the Hon’ble Commission through its the

orders on petitions no. 32 of 2013 and no. 45 of 2013.”

15


(vi) Issue: In the Load flow studies carried out for each year, load growth of 7 % and

capacity factor of 60 % of installed capacity for Wind, Solar and Biomass is considered

by MPPTCL. Therefore, the basis of aforesaid assumptions was sought from MPPTCL.

Response: “The load growth of 7% per year has been considered in the studies as per the

demand indicated by the State Planning Cell under MP Power Management Co. Ltd. based on

the 18th Electric Power Survey carried out by CEA. In the 19th Electric Power Survey carried out

by CEA also, the CAGR of demand growth in the state has been envisaged to be around 7% for

the 13th Plan period and beyond. The capacity factor of 60% for the renewal energy projects has

been considered in accordance with the Annexure-III (Generation & Load Factors) of Table-II

(Page-30) of CEA Transmission Planning Criteria-2013 for State as a whole.( Copy appended to

this reply as Annexure-II)”

(vii) Issue: While calculating pay-back period for reduction of losses in each year against

the proposed Capex Plan, MPPTCL has considered Rs. 4.84 as per unit charge of cost of

supply from ARR & Retail Supply Order for FY 2014-15 only. Therefore, the basis of

aforesaid assumption was asked from MPPTCL.

Response:- “The pay back period in the study has been computed based on the latest tariff

available at the time of finalization of the study which was Rs.4.84 per unit i.e. average cost of

supply in Retail supply tariff for 2014-15. The current average cost of supply as per the Retail

Supply Tariff order for the year FY-2017-18 is Rs.6.25 per unit”.

(viii) Issue: Documents in support of GoMP’s approval necessary for funding as mentioned

in the petition were sought from MPPTCL.

Response: “Approval of GoMP is required for funding from External funding Agencies only. The

relevant documents containing GoMP’s approvals are being arranged and compiled. The same

shall be produced before Hon’ble Commission, separately”.

(ix) Issue: It was submitted by MPPTCL that loss derived from the studies are the peak

power losses corresponding to peak load of 13594 MW for base year of the Plan. It was

contended, that, the present loss level of 2.71 % as reported in the MPPTCL’s RoC

report is annual energy loss for FY 2016-17.

16


MPPTCL was asked to submit peak power loss recorded by it during the past period of

three to five years, so that, the comparison of the past period peak power loss can be

made with the peak power loss envisaged by MPPTCL in the proposed Plan

Response: “The peak power losses are the instantaneous values computed for the load–

generation scenario and network configuration, with the simulation model incorporating

quantum and dispersal of generating sources and loads which are interlinked through the

network elements including lines and transformers at voltage-interfaces. The whole network, as

modelled, is assumed to be frozen at the peak load or off-peak load, as the study-scenario may

be, and the instantaneous active as well as reactive losses are computed for that particular

scenario using the line parameters, transformer loss data etc. . The annual energy losses are a

cumulative resultant of such instantaneous losses in the extremely large number of scenarios

which the system goes through during the course of one year. In short, the energy losses depict

the average power losses over a year and can be easily measured using the energy meter

readings at appropriate locations/interfaces. However, measurement of peak power losses in

the network will involve very precise synchronization of MW measurement at all the

appropriate locations at a particular time as well as communication & continuous data

processing facilities to measure the instantaneous (or short-period) power losses in the

network. Such a highly sophisticated and comprehensive loss measurement system for the

entire transmission network of the state, covering all the elements, with matching

communication and data-handling facilities is not become technically feasible, at present.

Therefore, simulation is the only workable methodology for reasonably accurate and realistic

estimation of instantaneous peak or off-peak power losses in any extensive and complex

network. Simulation, incidentally, has the inherent advantages of being much faster, cheaper

and susceptible to considerable refinement in accuracy with gradual accumulation of

correlated information/data.”

(x) Issue: The actual Financial and Physical achievements against the approved 12th Plan

have been 71 % and 54 % (for transmission lines only ) respectively . Further, for the

actual financial plan of 7857.19 Crs., in the proposal, an amount of Rs. 6964.11 Crs.

only is shown as tied up with various financial institutions. The basis for proposing the

balance 12 % investment plan without linkage with any financial institution was

sought from MPPTCL.

17


Response: “The petitioner has prepared a need-based plan, which includes projects under on-

going schemes from the previous 5-year plan, newly sanctioned schemes (e.g. KfW financed GEC

project) as well as residual part of the plan without firm financial arrangement at present. The

petitioner is in the process of obtaining financial assistance for the balance investment plan

shown as without financial arrangement at present. The investment plan is always prepared

with an optimistic perspective to cover all the need-based works, as far as possible, so that,

timely implementation, involving interdependent steps like detailed surveying, statutory

clearances, financial closure and tendering process, would be possible in due course when

funding source is finally selected and frozen. Moreover, phased investments for works which are

envisaged to be started during current plan period and completed during the next plan period

are also included in this Investment Plan”.

(xi) Issue: Clause 1.22 of the guidelines provides as under:

“MPPTCL shall carry out annual planning process corresponding to a 5

year forward term for identification of major works and capital expenditure

required for the State Transmission System which shall be consistent with the

National Power plan formulated by Central Government, any long-term plan

developed by CEA and the 5-year plan prepared by Central Transmission Utility.”

Therefore, the petitioner was asked to demonstrate that how the proposed five

year Capex Plan is complying with the above clause.

Response: “All the transmission works(mainly 400 KV works) required for interlinking the

Inter-state/inter-regional transmission system with the MPPTCL’s network and works related to

evacuation of power from upcoming central sector and joint sector power stations/IPPs/RE

generators have been included in the MPPTCL’s Investment Plan envisaged for the 13th Plan

period. The phasing and implementation schedule envisaged for these priority works/projects is

in consonance with the targets of central sector generation projects and transmission plan of

Central Transmission Utility and the connected State Transmission Utilities under the Western

Region. The status of implementation of such works is being closely monitored and appraised by

the Ministry of Power(GoI), C.E.A. , Western Region Power Committee (WRPC) , POSOCO(CTU),

PGCIL etc. at various meetings/forums. These works(mainly 400 KV works) are included in the

detailed year-wise list of works filed as Annexure-B with the instant petition.”

18


(xii) Issue: MPPTCL submitted that, the proposed plan is linked with the generating capacities to be added in the Plan period and the load growth in the system. However, the requirement of the network proposed in the Plan on account of load growth in the network was not discussed in the petition. Response: “The objectives of the transmission plan are composite in nature, as the growth in

generation, more or less, tends to coincide with the anticipated growth in demand of

power/energy. As most of the major generating stations shall be connected with CTU network,

all the works/projects needed for strengthening & capacity enhancement of the downstream

transmission system, i.e. 220 KV network and 132 KV network are primarily required to cater to

the anticipated load growth in the further downstream sub-transmission and distribution

networks of the Discoms, apart from the Discoms’ EHV consumers directly connected to

MPPTCL’s system. The only exceptions in this regard are power evacuation links from upcoming

Renewable Energy generation sources needed at 220 KV and 132 KV level, apart from the

interfacing arrangements(e.g. 33 KV & 11 KV bays at EHV S/s) needed at injection points for

Open Access customers. However, it is pertinent to be mentioned here, that, assets created

through Customer/Consumer contribution do not form a part of the Transmission Capex Plan.”

11. Vide No.MD/CZ/Comml-III/1565 dated 15th December’ 2017, Madhya Pradesh Madhya

Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (MPMKVVCL), Bhopal informed that it has no

objection/comments on the subject petition.

12. Vide No. 814 dated 18th January’ 2018, MPPMCL submitted its response to the petition.

Vide Commissions letter dated 100 dated 24th January’ 2018, the petitioner was asked to file its

point-wise reply to the aforesaid response filed by MPPMCL.

13. Vide its letter No 262 dated 02nd February’ 2018, the petitioner (MPPTCL) filed its point-

wise reply to the MPPMCL’s comments. The petitioner had endorsed a copy of its aforesaid reply to

MPPMCL also. Issue-wise response of MPPTCL on the comments of MPPMCL is enclosed with this

order as Annexure-A.

14. Besides above, the comments on the petition was received in the office of the Commission

from one stakeholder. Vide Commission’s letter No. 01 dated 01st January’ 2018, the copy of

aforesaid comments was sent to MPPTCL seeking their point-wise reply to the same. Vide its letter

No 142 dated 17th January’ 2017 (received in the office of the Commission on 23rd January’ 2017)

MPPTCL submitted its reply to each comment. The petitioner (MPPTCL) had endorsed a copy of its

aforesaid reply to objector also. Issue-wise response of MPPTCL on the comments/objections of

stakeholder is enclosed with this order as Annexure-B.

19


15. The public hearing in the subject matter was held in the Court room of the Commission on

23rd January’ 2017.

16. On examination of the subject petition, it has been observed that the five-year Capital

Investment Plan proposed and filed by MPPTCL in the subject petition is in accordance with the

“Guidelines for capital expenditure by licensees in Madhya Pradesh” issued by the Commission. It

is further observed that the aforesaid investment plan has been developed/ formulated by

MPPTCL after carrying out system studies considering expected availability of power and load

growth during the plan period. The system studies have been conducted by a third party i.e. M/s.

Electrical Research & Development Association (ERDA), Vadodara for the period in proposed

investment plan. The works which are proposed in the Capex Plan have been identified on the

basis of system studies carried out by MPPTCL through consultant. All the works identified after

system studies and proposed in the Capital Investment Plan have been tabulated and submitted as

Annexure with the petition mentioning requisite details. The financial analysis on the aforesaid

capital expenditure plan is also submitted with the petition. The petitioner has also stated various

financial institutions/sources to fund the proposed capital investment.

17. Considering all above and the response of petitioner on the comments offered by the

respondent and stakeholders, the Commission under clause 1.15 of the “Guidelines for Capital

expenditure by licensees in Madhya Pradesh” hereby accords in principle approval to the following

investment plan filed by MPPTCL:

(A) FINANCIAL PLAN: (Amount Rs. in Lacs)

S. No

Particulars YEARWISE INVESTMENT (2017-22) (Rs in Lakhs) TOTAL

(FY 2017-22) (Need based)

FY 2017-18

(Need based)

FY 2018-19

(Need based)

FY 2019-20

(Need based)

FY 2020-21

(Need based)

FY 2021-22

(Need based)

1 400KV Lines 17649 37548 52144 30100 21637 159078 2 220KV Lines 32172 36287 30063 22885 14414 135821

3 132KV Lines 33587 41851 35325 28591 29921 169275

A TOTAL (LINES) 83408 115686 117532 81576 65972 464174

4 400KV Substations

19402 24003 25893 6478 7408 83184

5 220KV Substations

20517 19734 27956 23200 17727 119134

6 132KV Substations

26649 33957 32633 37758 28183 159181

7 Misc. Works 9870 12422 15654 61485 83813 163243

B TOTAL (SUBSTATIONS)

76438 100115 102136 128921 117132 524742

G. TOTAL (A+B) 159846 215801 219669 210497 183103 988915

20


(B) PHYSICAL PLAN:

S. No.

Particulars YEARWISE PHYSICAL PROGRAMME (FY 2017-18 to FY-2021-22

TOTAL

(FY 2017-22) (Need Based)

FY 2017-18 (Anticipa

ted)

FY 2018-19

(Need Based)

FY 2019-20

(Need Based)

FY 2020-21

(Need Based)

FY 2021-22

(Need Based)

A EHV LINES (CIRCUIT KMS) 1 400KV Lines 0.0 457 690 10 0 1157

2 220KV Lines 482 211 1124 864 180 2861

3 132KV Lines 829 720 1965 562 275 4351

TOTAL CKT KMS

1311 1387 3779 1436 455 8368

B EHV SUB-STATIONS (MVA)

1 400KV Substations

630.0 830.0 1890.0 630.0 0.0 3980.0

2 220KV Substations

800.0 1200.0 2340.0 2170.0 960.0 7470.0

3 132KV Substations

1029.5 2050.0 2078.0 593.0 713.0 6463.5

TOTAL MVA 2459.5 4080.0 6308.0 3393.0 1673.0 17913.5

EHV SUB-STATIONS (Nos)

1 400KV Substations

0 2 3 0 0 5

2 220KV Substations

3 2 10 5 1 21

3 132KV Substations

9 15 21 8 7 60

TOTAL (Nos) 12 19 34 13 8 86

18. Details of works proposed under the above investment plan as filed by the petitioner are

enclosed as Annexure C with this order. The in-principle approval of the Commission to above

Capital Investment Plan is subject to the following terms and conditions:

Terms and Conditions:

(i) The Respondent (MPPMCL) in its comments has mentioned about certain directions issued

to the petitioner (MPPTCL) from Energy Department, Govt. of MP. Being State Transmission

Utility, the petitioner (MPPTCL) shall ensure compliance with the directions issued by

Energy Department, Govt. of MP before implementation of works under proposed Capital

Investment Plan.

21


(ii) As stated in its reply to comments at Para 7 offered by (MPPMCL) Respondent , the

petitioner (MPPTCL) shall always ensure that most efficient use of financial resources

should be made by MPPTCL while implementing the proposed plan so that the cost burden

on the beneficiaries/users of the transmission system be least.

(iii) MPPTCL shall examine the economic, technical system and environmental aspects of all

viable alternatives before execution of the proposals and investing in or acquiring new

transmission system, assets.

(iv) The schemes which have been tied up either through an agreement with the funding agency

or with due sanction of the funding agency and certified as completed & capitalized by the

MPPTCL, will be considered for the purpose of allowing depreciation, interest cost and

return on equity etc., while determining the Annual Revenue Requirement/Truing-up of

ARR for MPPTCL.

(v) The works under schemes like Power System Development Fund (PSDF) shown as funded

through grant should be approved by the competent authority and the tariff for all such

works shall be considered appropriately by the Commission in accordance with the terms

and conditions under each scheme.

(vi) The cost incurred by MPPTCL on capital works shall be considered by the Commission for

tariff purpose after exercising prudent check in accordance with the provisions under

applicable MPERC (Terms and Conditions for determination of Transmission Tariff)

Regulations.

(vii) The cost of items, instruments, spares, installation and commissioning charges, freight, etc.

quoted/ charged by the suppliers/ vendors should be properly analyzed and verified by

MPPTCL to ensure that the cost incurred by it, is in line with the lowest possible prevailing

market price for desired quality work.

(viii) MPPTCL shall be required to file the updated physical and financial progress of all works

completed during each financial year as an annexure with each true-up petition filed by the

MPPTCL with the Commission. The MPPTCL shall also provide the details of completion

cost, details of capitalization including debt and equity as on project completion date along

with the true up petition

22


(ix) MPPTCL is advised to ensure timely utilization of material being procured against base cost

in the proposal to avoid any extra financial liability.

(x) MPPTCL shall ensure that cost escalations are consistent with market conditions. Any

unjustified escalated cost shall not be considered for the purpose of tariff determination.

(xi) MPPTCL shall ensure timely completion of the projects so that MPPTCL gets due benefits in

terms of reduction of losses and also in capacity building, system strengthening, voltage

improvement, and for improving the reliability of services. The beneficiaries should also get

timely benefits from these projects. MPPTCL has to give top priority on the timely

completion of the projects in the best possible manner within the approved financial

resources.

(xii) MPPTCL shall comply with the Guide-lines for capital expenditure issued by the

Commission and the various Regulations/codes issued from time to time.

(xiii) MPPTCL shall obtain the in-principle approval of the Commission in case of any change in

the present Capital Investment Plan filed with the subject petition.

With the above directions, the subject petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Jha) (Mukul Dhariwal) (Dr. Dev Raj Birdi)

Member Member Chairman

23

Annexure-A

Comments raised by MPPMCL and response submitted by MPPTCL in

Petition No 33/2017.

(i) Comments of MPPMCL Para 1 to 4 :

That, the petitioner MP Power Transmission Company Limited, (hereinafter mentioned as

MPPTCL)is a Company with GoMP having 100% ownership, registered under Companies act 1956 and

is undertaking the Intra-State transmission activity in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

That, Government of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred as GoMP), vide order 2491/13/64

Bhopal 17.05.2004 has declared MPPTCL as State transmission utility w.e.f. 01.06.2004. Henceforth, it

discharges the function of planning and coordination relating to Intra-State Transmission System for the

benefits of end users of State of M.P. in order to extend them all benefits as planned by GoMP.

That, the petitioner has filed the instant petition for approval of comprehensive five years capital

investment plan for the period FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22 amounting Rs.9889.15 Crores.

That, at the outset it is to reiterate that MPPTCL is fully owned by GoMP and as such GoMP has

full control over working and planning of MPPTCL. In other words, MPPTCL does its planning in

accordance with policies of GoMP and GoMP, Energy Deptt. has full authority to supervise/amend/alter

the planning made by MPPTCL.

Response of MPPTCL:

“In paragraphs no. 1 to 4 of the submission, the Respondent no. 1(MPPMCL) has stated facts

related to the status of the petitioner as a Company having 100 % ownership of GOMP and regarding

the instant petition filed before the Hon’ble Commission.”

(ii) Comments of MPPMCL Para 5:

That, during the pendency of instant petition, a high level meeting has taken place on 09.12.2017 at

Energy Deptt. Bhopal in the matter of review of MP Transco and Minutes of Meeting (MoM) of the

same has been circulated vide Dy.Secy. Energy Deptt. letter no. 79/2018/13 dated 03.01.2018.

Response of MPPTCL:

“In the para 5 of the submission, the respondent no. 1 has mentioned about a high level meeting held

in Energy Deptt. GOMP, on 9-12-2017 in the matter of review of MPPTCL, wherein Energy Deptt.,

GOMP had directed regarding submission of proposals for new Sub-stations through Managing

Director, MPPMCL . The petition in question was filed on 31-07-2017, i.e. well before the meeting

held on 9-12-2017, with preparation for a considerable period of several months before submission.

Although there is no explicit direction of Energy Deptt., GOMP regarding formulation of 5-Year

Capital Investment Plan, MPPTCL had followed the conventional practice without intention to

overlook any direction of the Energy Deptt., GOMP. As the proceedings in respect of the instant

24

petition have advanced to the last stage and public hearing has been held, it may not be prudent now to

revert back to the original status and begin afresh. However, it is quite pertinent to mention here, that,

continuous interaction and exchange of information between MPPTCL and MPPMCL/Discoms for

finalizing the proposals received from Discoms for new 132 KV S/s is the adopted practice since

beginning. Meetings are also held between the various stakeholders for this purpose.

(iii) Comments of MPPMCL Para 6:

That, a bare perusal of MoM reveals that following directions have been given by GoMP Energy

Deptt. to MP Transco in this meeting.

(a) The proposal for new Sub-stations shall be submitted through MD, MPPMCL, as already

instructed (item no. 9)

(b) In order to resolve the right of way (ROW) issues, higher capacity conductor may be used in

such identified lines to improve the transmission capacity of line (item no. 10)

(c) Possibility of reconditioning shall be explored in 25% of transformers that are in service for

more than 25 years in cases of proposed replacement of transformers is FY 2020-21. This will

increase life span by 10years (item no. 17)

It is humbly submitted that the above directions issued by GoMP need compliance as the

petition does not incorporates the actions taken on above issues.

Response of MPPTCL:

The response of the petitioner to the directions given by the Energy Deptt., GOMP, mentioned at

para 6 of the submission made by the Respondent no.1(MPPMCL), is as follows”.

“(a) The procedure for submitting all the proposals for new EHV sub-stations through MD,

MPPMCL(Respondent no.1) has already been initiated for finalizing the proposals of new EHV

sub-stations. However, it is pertinent to mention here, that, as per the general practice adopted,

the proposals for new 132 KV S/s received from the Discoms are thoroughly examined by the

petitioner MPPTCL, from the point of view of being the technically feasible least cost alternative

under existing and anticipated constraints and compulsions. If the proposal is not found to meet

this requirement, then, the proposal is not considered for inclusion in the investment plan and

Discoms are advised to consider alternative remedies like strengthening or modifying their

downstream sub-transmission(33 KV) networks.

(b) To enhance the capacity of transmission corridors/lines having Right-of-Way(RoW) issues,

several works which are listed below, have already been included in the Capital Investment Plan

for the 13th

Plan period :-

(i) Uprating capacity of Indore 400 KV S/s - Indore S/Z 220 KV S/s, 220 KV DCDS line by

re-conductoring with Zebra equivalent STACIR conductor (4 Km)

(ii) Uprating capacity of Bhopal 400 KV S/s-Bhopal 220 KV S/s, 220 KV DCDS line by re-

conductoring with Zebra equivalent STACIR conductor (12.1 Km)

25

(iii) Replacement of ACSR Zebra with high capacity (ACCR) Zebra conductor for Nagda 400

KV S/s to Nagda 220 kV S/s, 220 KV D/C line (2 Kms.)

(iv) Replacement of ACSR Zebra with high capacity (ACCR) Zebra conductor for Bina

400KV S/s to Bina 220 kV S/s 220 KV D/C line (10 Kms.)

(v) Replacement of Indore(SZ) – Satyasai S/s - Chambal S/s 132 KV Line with HTLS

conductor (25 kms.)

(vi) Replacement of ACSR Panther with HTLS Conductor for Bhopal – Amrawatkhurd S/s –

MACT S/s 132kV DCDS line(55 kms.)

(c) The petitioner( MPPTCL) shall adopt the practice of re-conditioning of 25 % of the

transformers in service for more than 25 years, which are proposed to be replaced by FY 2021-

22.

It is clear from the foregoing submission, that, the petitioner MPPTCL has already complied

with the general and specific requirements contained in the directives given by the Energy Deptt,

GOMP, vide letter no. 79/2018/13 dtd. 3-01-2018.”

(iv) Comments of MPPMCL Para 7:

That, the petitioner has mentioned about in house studies carried out by the petitioner for

formulation of transmission planning for FY 2017-18 to 2021-22. The work of system studies for

reduction in transmission losses to match with MPERC target was entrusted to Electrical Research

and Development Association (ERDA), Vadodara. The petitioner has annexed the executive

summary report submitted by ERDA on Transmission loss reduction study for MPPTCL as

Annexure-B with the petition in support of its proposal.

(a) That, in this report, under heading “Load Flow Study” on page-4, Graph-1, Load data has been

plotted from year 2013-14 to 2021-22. The comparison of peak load shown in the load flow

study for year 2013-14 to 2017-18 with the actual peak load achieved is as below :-

Year 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

(upto Dec 17

Peak load as per

petitioner(MW) 10590 11491 12581 13594 14437

Peak demand as per actual

(MW) 9758 9832 10841 11421 12240

% difference in peak load

mentioned in Load Flow

Study and actual load flow

8.5% 16.87% 16.05% 19.02% 17.95%

26

The above details show that peak load taken by the petitioner in Load Flow Study is

nearly 18-19 % on higher side than the actual data.

(b) Similarly the capacity addition plan from 2014-15 to 2021-22 has been shown in Graph-3. The

details of capacity addition in MW, shown in the graph and the actual capacity addition

achieved/proposed is as below:-

Year 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 Total

as per

petitioner 2535 1846 2040 2281 3031 3424 355 360 15872

Actual /

Proposed 2535 1845 971 2878 2730 1519 1465 29 13972

% difference 0% 0% 110% -21% 11% 125% -76% 1141% 14%

From above is clear that the generation addition taken in the Load Flow Study is 14% more

than the actual / proposed generation addition by the DISCOMs upto year 2021-22.

(c) Similarly in Table 3 for transmission losses the peak load in MW, and energy supplied in million

units is far more than the actual. The Load Factor taken is also 0.74 which is also on higher side.

Due to above there is a possibility that the average Transmission Loss calculated on the basis of

load flow may be higher than the actual Transmission Losses of the system.

Due to above mentioned factors, the Transmission Loss study may not be accurate and the

proposed works on the basis of this study need reconsideration.

Response of MPPTCL:

“In paragraph 7 of the submission made by Respondent no. 1( MPPMCL) data of projected peak

load has been compared with the actual peak demands for FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18(upto Dec

2017) to show, that, the projected peak demand taken in load flow study carried out by M/s ERDA,

Vadodara is higher than the actual recorded peak demand by about 18-19 %. Similarly, generation

capacity addition plan envisaged in the study by M/s ERDA has been shown to be higher than the

generation capacity addition proposed/achieved, by about 14 %, overall, between FY 14-15 to FY

21-22. In this context, it is pertinent to mention here, that, Power Supply Projections up to FY 22

were made available by the State Planning Cell, MPPMCL(Respondent no.1) in July , 2013 and

November, 2013. Copies of the documents showing the same are appended as Annexure-I and

Annexure-II. It can be seen from the same, that, the projections of peak demand and generation

capacity addition used by M/s ERDA, Vadodara, match very closely with the Power Supply

Projections made by MPPMCL. Growth in demand is dependent on several factors and is subject to

a certain degree of uncertainty. Transmission system has to be invariably designed with an

optimistic perspective to ensure sufficient capacity and reliability margins as per the transmission

system planning criteria and completely rule out any threat to system stability and security under the

anticipated load–generation scenario. Conservative approach in planning of transmission system to

27

save initial capital costs can cause irreversible drawbacks in the system which may prove costlier in

the long-term. Addition of generation capacity necessitates only creation of the associated evacuation

system and interconnections, which can be postponed or excluded from the investment plan, as the

situation warrants.

However, certain vital aspects related to the process of transmission system planning which need to

be highlighted, are as follows:

(i) The projected or actual peak demand is the coincident load of the system at the

macroscopic level, which is the resultant of a very large number of loads at

microscopic level, each with their own annual, seasonal, cyclic, diurnal variations and

trends and subject to a certain level of uncertainty.

(ii) The planning of transmission system invariably follows a “bottom-to-up” approach,

wherein, system strengthening and capacity addition requirements are determined at the

microscopic level ( e.g. at EHV S/s level or feeder level), taking into account the

anticipated loads as per historical trends at the microscopic level.

(iii) The process always attempts to aim for the technically feasible least cost alternative,

satisfying the basic system planning criteria under existing and anticipated constraints

and compulsions. On the whole, the least cost solution is based on best possible

assessment of the existing and anticipated scenarios. With this approach, investment is

planned to meet the projected system requirements with minimum possible mismatch.

(iv) After completion of the planning process and initiation of the project execution phase, in

general, it is financially detrimental, practically difficult and technically unfeasible to

stop and revert it. However, execution of works is always taken up in a phased manner

gradually adapting to the changing scenarios and modifying or postponing works if there

are sufficiently strong reasons to do so. Therefore, through adaptive execution of works,

inessential investments are avoided or at least postponed at the microscopic level as per

the changing requirements, resulting in more efficient use of financial resources and

reducing the cost burden on the beneficiaries/users of the transmission system.

(v) If any work, not tied up financially and not commenced, is found to be redundant as per

the anticipated scenario at a later stage, then, the work is excluded from the plan leading

to avoidance of unnecessary and wasteful investment.

(vi) In the event of abandoning of any generation project, the associated evacuation system

planned for it is excluded from the investment plan. Two prominent examples in this

regard are the evacuation systems for 2x660 MW Reva TPS(distt. Khandwa) and 2x800

MW Dada Dhuniwale TPS(distt. Khandwa), which were excluded from the investment

plan due to cancellation of these generation projects.

28

In Table 3 of the study report of M/s ERDA , the projected figures of unrestricted energy requirement

match quite closely with the corresponding figures furnished by the State Planning Cell,

MPPMCL(ref. Annexures- I & II). However, these figures are not directly related to the Load Factor

of 0.74 adopted for estimating the average power loss and annual energy losses in the transmission

system through load flow simulation and using the empirical relationship between Load Factor and

Loss Load Factor. The load factor of 0.74 is assessed on the basis of the load curves of downstream

transmission system elements rather than the system peak demand(equal to generation) and

aggregate annual energy input from all the generation sources”.

(v) Comments of MPPMCL Para 8:

It is worthwhile to mention here that GoMP / GoI is laying special stress on installation of Roof

Top Solar systems, green energy buildings and energy efficient appliances resulting in distributed

generation. The number of units sold in various categories of HT and LT consumers (combined for all

the three Discoms) remained more or less same in 2016-17 as compared to 2015-16. Due to adoption

of energy efficient systems, it is expected that the present trend will continue. Therefore, it is clear

that the planning is being done for such expected demand in near future is on a higher side.

Response of MPPTCL:

“The petitioner MPPTCL acknowledges the prospective impact of Roof-top Solar systems, Green

Energy Buildings, energy efficient appliances and rapidly increasing penetration of renewable

energy sources in general. However, there is no reliable methodology available to assess its impact

at the microscopic level. It is expected that the impact in question will be visible in the actual load

data and gradually a trend will emerge to facilitate suitable adaptation in transmission system

strengthening and capacity addition. MPPTCL shall certainly take advantage of the support

available from the distributed renewable energy sources to reduce its capital investment and the cost

burden on the beneficiaries/users of the transmission system.”

(vi) Comments of MPPMCL Para 9:

That, the transmission losses of MPPTCL from 2013-14 to 2021-22 have been shown in Graph-

4. The graph shows that average loss and peak loss of MPPTCL shall be the least at a level of 2.07%

and 2.20% respectively in year 2018-19. Thereafter it will follow a rising trend and will reach a level

of 2.23% and 2.43% respectively in 2021-22. It appears strange that on the one hand the company is

planning capital investment for the sake of reduction of losses while on the other hand the losses are

going to increase, as per study, during the same period. This raises a question mark on the planning

methodology.

Response of MPPTCL:

“In paragraph 9 of the submission made by MPPMCL(Respondent no.1) , there is mention of

decreasing trend followed by an increasing trend in loss level after FY 2018-19. The basic objective

of the investment plan is to ensure adequate quality, reliability and security of supply as per the

transmission planning criteria in the anticipated future scenarios. The works in the investment plan

also entail reduction in losses primarily due to system strengthening and integration of distributed

generation. Apart from this, loss reduction measures like reactive power compensation through shunt

capacitors have also been envisaged in the plan. The loss figures are estimated on the basis of load

flow simulation of representative scenarios and they reflect the estimated loss level which may be

29

achieved through the investment plan. The loss levels are estimated to reduce appreciably to about

2.20 % vis-a-vis say loss level of 2.71 %(2016-17) - which is already the lowest among the large

sized states in the country. It is reckoned, that, reducing loss levels any further would result in an

inordinate increase in investment with rapidly diminishing returns and financial viability.”

(vii) Comments of MPPMCL Para 10:

MPPTCL has proposed many sub-stations, additional transformers and lines on 400 KV level.

Similarly Green Energy Corridor is also proposed on 400 KV level.Here it is to mention that 400 KV

and above voltage level planning is simultaneously done by CTU / PGCIL in consultation with CEA

and other agencies. MPPTCL has not mentioned regarding coordination with CTU in their planning

of 400 KV system and Green Energy Corridor.Therefore, it will be in the best interest of consumers

of the State that capital investment of MPPTCL matches with the planning of Central Transmission

Utility, in order to avoid idling/ under- utilization of lines/system so that such assets may not

ultimately prove to be unnecessary financial burden to consumers.

Response of MPPTCL:

“The planning of transmission system at 400 KV and higher level, is always done in consultation

and with approval of statutory bodies and other agencies like Central Electricity Authority(C.E.A.),

Regional Power Committees(RPCs), CTU/PGCIL etc. . The planning is backed by several cross-

checks and feedbacks at various levels and the status is also monitored closely by the Central Govt.,

MoP, CEA, CTU, RPCs and even State Govt. Therefore, as such, the process leaves no room for

deficiencies in planning, although execution of works may involve some unforeseen hurdles and

issues related to say RoW, land acquisition, contractors’ performance, law & order problems etc.”

(viii) Comments of MPPMCL Para 11:

That, no provision for funding from the Power System Development Fund has been planned by

the petitioner. The petitioner has also not mentioned what efforts have been made by the petitioner to

arrange funds from this fund.

Response of MPPTCL:

“The Respondent no. 1(MPPMCL)’s contention at paragraph 11 of the submission, that, no

provision for funding from Power System Development Fund(PSDF) has been planned by the

petitioner, is incorrect. The petitioner has indeed made a provision of Rs. 103 Crores for a scheme

sanctioned by nodal agency NLDC under PSDF with a grant of Rs. 92.70 Crs. for the 13th

Plan

period. The same has been shown in the Annexure-B submitted as a part of the instant petition. This

scheme, includes works under the categories of replacement of circuit breakers/ CTs /PTs CVTs/

Surge Arrestors, Isolators of 400 KV, 220 KV & 132 KV voltage class apart from protection

system(relays) at EHV S/s. It is pertinent to briefly mention here the specific objectives of PSDF,

which are as follows –

(i) Creating transmission systems of strategic importance for relieving congestion in inter-state

transmission system (ISTS) and intra-state transmission system incidental to the ISTS

30

(ii) Installation of shunt capacitors, series compensators and other reactive energy generators

including reactive energy absorption, dynamic reactive support etc. for improvement in voltage

profile in the Grid

(iii)Installation of standard and special protection schemes, pilot and demonstrative projects for

setting right the discrepancies identified in protection audits, any communication/

measurement/ monitoring system including Phasor Measurement Units(PMUs) etc.

(iv) Renovation and Modernization of transmission and distribution systems for relieving

congestion

(v) Any other scheme/ project in furtherance of above objectives, such as, conducting technical

studies and capacity building etc.

It is clear from the specific categories of objectives outlined above, that, regular infrastructural

works, which form the major portion of any long-term capital investment plan, are not eligible for

funding under the PSDF. Moreover, the proposals for funding under PSDF are quite stringently

scrutinized by the nodal agency NLDC before declaring them eligible for funding”.

(ix) Comments of MPPMCL Para 12:

That, the petitioner has proposed the work of evacuation of power from NTPC Barethi (Chattarpur)

plant in its planning for 2020-21. It is to submit that the as per present status of work, the plant is not

expected to come up by the year 2020-21. Further, the system for evacuation of power from this

substation shall be developed by the Power Grid.Therefore, the planning of evacuation of power by

MP Transco shall be in line and coordination with the work plan of Power Grid.

Response of MPPTCL:

“The work for interlinking MP’s intra-state transmission system to proposed Barethi TPS(distt.

Chhatarpur) of NTPC involves only LILO of Chhatarpur-Tikamgarh 220 KV DCDS line at CTU’s

proposed 400 KV Bijawar S/s, which does not involve very substantial physical and financial

implications. This work can be executed according to future developments.

The petitioner MPPTCL submits, that, the issues raised by Respondent no. 1 (MPPMCL) have been

have been adequately clarified and explained in the context of the process of planning, projections &

forecasts, loss levels, investments etc. Therefore, the petitioner MPPTCL humbly prays before the

Hon’ble Commission to kindly consider and approve the proposed Capital Investment Plan for the

13th

Plan period, please.”

31

Annexure-B

vkifRr;ka ,oa izR;qRrj

vkifRr ¼1½

;kfpdkdrkZ] e-iz- -

9889- vusdksa ubZ ;kstuk;sa

u gSa] ftudk dk;Z

izxfr ij gSA

-31 ds vuqlkj iwoZ esa [email protected]/khu ;kstukvksa gsrq iqu%

r%

mRrj ¼1½

;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu layXud&c ¼Annexure-B

varxZr lfEefyr izR;sd ikjs"k.k dk;Z ds fy; -04-17½

esa

miyC/k gSA iwoZ ls py jgh ;kstu

rk

ij dksbZ izHkko ugha iM+rkA

vkifRr ¼2½

;kfpdk ds iSjk 3 esa mYysf[kr rkfydk esa dk;Zn{krk ds fcanq “ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh miyC/krk” ekuuh; vk;ksx }kjk fu/kkZfjr y{; ls

T;knk gS ogha ikjs"k.k gkfu fu/kkZfjr y{; ls lkekU;r% de gSA fdarq iSjk 4 esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd vk;ksx }kjk fu/kkZfjr ikjs"k.k gkfu ds y{;

ERDA½ cM+ksnjk dkss vkoafVr fd;k

s"k.k gkfu ls de gSA vr% ikjs"k.k gkfu ds

vk/kkj ij esllZ ¼ERDA½ }kjk izLrkfor ubZ ;kstuk;sa mfpr izrhr ugha gksrh gSaA

mRrj ¼2½

; esa

s laiw.kZ

fjr iz.kkyh lqj{kk

¼Security Reliability½ ds ekin.Mksa dk vuqikyu Hkh nf"Vxr j[kk tkuk egRoiw.kZ gSA

vkifRr ¼3½

32

k

gsrq ubZ ikjs"k.k ;kstuk;sa izLrkfor dh xbZ gSaA fdarq laHkkfor vfrfjDr fo|qr miyC/krk dk laf{kIr fooj.k ugha fn;k x;k gSA vfrfjDr fo|qr

miyC/krk gsrq dkSu ls rki ,oa ty fo|qr [email protected]/khu gS tks fd iwoZ dh ;kstukvksa esa lfEefyr ugha fd;s x;s gSa] ds fooj.k dk

pj.k&II o NTPC dh xkMjokM+k o [kjxkSsu fo|qr ifj;kstukvksa ds vykok dksbZ Hkh rki o ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk fuekZ.kk/khu@vfxze pj.k dh

;kstuk fLFkfr esa ugha gSA

ekuuh; vk;ksx }kjk fnukad 01-04-16 ls 31-03-19 rd gsrq tkjh ikjs"k.k VsfjQ vkMZj fnukad 10 twu 2016 esa foRr o"kZ 2017&18 esa

Z 2017&18

s le; yxHkx 8000 ls 10000

Sj o`f) dh laHkkouk gSA

vr% iz.kkyh dh lqn<+rk ds en~nsutj ubZ ;kstukvksa dh O;ogk;Zrk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrhA

;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd orZeku esa e-iz-ikoj tujsfVax daiuh ds lHkh rki fo|qr xg lesfdr :i ls ek= 42% la;a= Hkkj xq.kkad

¼PLF½ ij dk;Zjr gSa] rFkkfi ikjs"k.k ykbZu@vU; midj.k@mixzg iw.kZ 100 % {kerk ds vuqlkj LFkkfir gSa] ftlls fd vke turk dks] fu;r

izHkkj ds :i esa izHkkoghu ¼Idle½ mRiknu {kerk ds lkFk&lkFk izHkkoghu ikjs"k.k {kerk dk Hkqxrku fctyh njksa esa vizR;{k :i ls djuk iM+rk

ikWfylh ds vuqikyu esa fnukad 05-01- PPA½ fj;k;rh fo|qr ds vykok] u;s rki fo|qr xgksa

ls laikfnr ugha gSA

mRrj ¼3½

;kfpdk ds iSjk 4 esa vfrfjDr fo|qr miyC/krk dk mYys[k esllZ bjMk] cM+ksnjk }kjk rS;kj dh xbZ fjiksVZ dh la{ksfidk

¼Executive Summary dk lqn<+hdj.k] {kerk o`f) ,oa foLrkj eq[;r%

laHkkfor Hkkj o`f) ds ifjizs{; esa fd;k tkrk gS rkfd iz.kkyh ds mi;ksxdrkZ vuqKfIr/kkfj;ksa ls lac) miHkksDrkvksa dks fu/kkZfjr ekinaMksa ds

LFkkfir fl)karksa ,oa ekinaMksa ds vuqlkj ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh {kerk vf/kdre Hkkj ls vf/kd gksuk okaNuh; gS D;ksafd bl vkf/kD; ls

gh iz.kkyh dh i;kZIr fo”

vfrfjDr

rj o"kZokj c<+k;s

A

vkifRrdrkZ }kjk 42% la;a= Hkkj xq.kkad ¼PLF½ ij dk;Zjr e-iz-ikWoj tujsfVax daiuh ds fo|qr la;a=ksa gsrq ikjs"k.k [email protected] bR;kfn dh

Idle

ij iM+ jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd fdlh Hkh ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh {kerk laHkkfor mPpre Hkkj@miyC/krk ds vuqlkj gh LFkkfir djuk

/kk ;k laiw.kZ iz.kkyh dk ladV mRiUu u gks rFkk iznk; dh xq.koRrk

ij Hkh foijhr izHkko u iM+sA blds foijhr] 42 % la;a= xq.kkad ¼PLF½ ,d okf"kZd vkSlr dk lead gS] ftls fl}karr%] ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh

:ijs[kk@{kerk dk vk/kkj drbZ ugha cuk;k tk ldrk gSA

vr% LFkkfir fl)karksa@ekunaMksa ds vuqlkj cukbZ xbZ ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh :ijs[kk@{kerk dh ykxr dk mi;ksxdrkZvksa }kjk ogu

djuk ,d loZlEer ,oa ;qfDr;qDr O;kolkf;d izfreku ¼Business Model

ykxr ls lacaf/kr u gksdj vU; dkj.kksa ij vf/kd fuHkZj gSA

33

vkifRr ¼4½

;kfpdk ds iSjk 4 esa mYysf[kr fo|qr Hkkj esa of) ¼Load Growth½ lkekU;r% fo|qr forj.k daifu;ksa }kjk fofHkUu Js.kh ds miHkksDrkvksa

ds fo|qr Hkkj esa o`f)@ubZ lajpukvksa dk fodkl@de {kerk bR;kfn ds lac

ds lkFk ¼;fn

fy;k x;k gS½ dk dksbZ mYys[k ;kfpdk esa ugha gSA

mRrj ¼4½

-iz- ikoj eSustesaV daiuh fyfeVsM ds rRokOk/kku esa rhuksa forj.k daifu;ksa

s"k.k iz.kkyh

dh {kerk of) rFkk lqn<+hdj.k dh :ijs[kk cukbZ tkrh gSA u;s 132@33 dsOgh midsanzksa dh LFkkiuk ds izLrko forj.k daifu;ksa }kjk gh rS;kj

fd;s tkrs gSa ftldk ijh{k.k ikjs"k.k daiuh }kjk rduhdh lk/;rk ds vuqlkj fd;k tkrk gSA bl gsrq ikjs"k.k daiuh] ikWoj eSustesaV daiuh ,oa

rhuksa forj.k daifu;ksa ds e/; lwpuk dk fujarj vknku&iznku fd;k tkrk gS ,oa cSBdsa Hkh vk;ksftr dh tkrh gSaA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd u;s

mPpnkc midsanz dk fodYi varr% rHkh p;u fd;k tkrk gSs tc rduhdh ,oa nh?kZdkyhu foRrh; nf"Vdks.kksa ls vU; fodYi lk/; u gksaaA bl

qeku dh izfØ;k ds vuqlkj Lor% U;wure foRrh; Hkkj okyk

fodYi gksrk gSA

vkifRr ¼5½

k

k fnukad 31.03-2017 dh fLFkfr esa ek= 1473-7 djksM+ miyC/k gSA tks fd orZeku le; esa vkSj de

mYys[k

;kstuk,a futh {ks= ls ih-ih-ih-eksM esa izLrkfor gS] mYys[k ugha gSA

mRrj ¼5½

¼iSjk 6

dh rkfydk½ ,oa foLrr ¼iSjk 7½ fooj.k miyC/k gSA fooj.k ls Li"V gS fd fofHkUu L=ksrksa ;Fkk ,-Mh-ch-] ih-,l-Mh-,Q-] tk;dk] vkj-bZ-lh-] ds-

,Q-MCY;w- bR;kfn ls dqy yxHkx :- 5550 djksM+ miyC/k jgsaxs] ftlesa _.kksa dh ‘ -iz-

kk miyC/k ugha gS] ds

fy;s Hkh fofHkUu laLFkkvksa@cSadksa ls foRrh; lgk;rk miyC/k djokus ds iz;kl mPp izkFkfedrk ij fd;s tk jgs gSaA iwathxr O;; ;kstuk esa ih-

ih-ih-eksM ds varxZr dksbZ Hkh dk;Z izLrkfor ugha fd;k x;k gSA rFkkfi] foRrh; lalk/kuksa dh fLFkfr ds vuqlkj ih-ih-ih- eksM ds varxZr fuos"k

vkeaf=r fd;k tk ldrk gSA

vkifRr ¼6½

nk;j ;kfpdk esa ;g mYys[k ugha gS fd orZeku fnukad 31-03-2017 dh fLFkfr esa ;kfpdkdrkZ daiuh dh dqy ikjs"k.k {kerk izR;sd

pj.kksa esa ;Fkk&400 dsOgh ls 220 dsOgh] 220 dsOgh ls 132 dsOgh rFkk 132 dsOgh ls 33 dsOgh ,eoh, rFkk ,eMCY;w esa fdruh gS] rFkk

i`Fkd&iFkd ikjs"k.k ykbuksa dh yackbZ fdruh gS] rFkk fdrus&fdrus fo|qr mixg LFkkfir gaSA rFkk ekax dh rqyuk esa ljIyl {kerk fdruh

gSA rFkk orZeku fuekZ.kk/khu@izLrkfor dk;ksZa ds ckn fdruh {kerk gks tk;sxhA rFkk orZeku fctyh [kir of) ds en~nsutj fdruh {kerk

ljIyl gks tk;sxhA

34

mRrj ¼6½

ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh {kerk dk vkadyu ;k vuqeku oksYVst Lrj ds vuqlkj ugha fd;k tkrk gS oju~ iz.kkyh ds fofHkUu vo;oksa ds ,d

lkFk la;ksftr gksus

-03-2017 dh fLFkfr esa e-iz-

ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh oksYVst Lrjokj fLFkfr fuEukuqlkj gS%&

vfr mPpnkc ykbZusa %

1- 400 dsOgh ykbZu & 3074-45 lfdZV fdyksehVj




&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

dqy 32369-39 lfdZV fdyksehVj

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

midsanz ¼mix`g½

la[;k {kerk ¼,eOgh,½

1- 400 dsOgh & 9 7350

2- 220 dsOgh & 71 21990

3- 132 dsOgh & 250 24056

4- 66 dsOgh & 1 20

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

dqy 331 53416

e-iz-ikWoj eSustesaV daiuh ,oa rhuksa forj.k daifu;ksa }kjk miyC/k djk;s x;s fo|qr miHkksx@ekax ds iz{ksfir vkadM+ksa ds

iz.kkyh dh {kerk gsrq fuEufyf[kr izkof/kd y{; vuqekfur fd;s x;s gSa%&

iz{ksfir mPpre ikjs"k.k {kerk

ekax ¼esxkokWV½ vuqekfur y{; ¼esxkokWV½

2017&18 14437 16200

2018&19 15376 17200

2019&20 16298 18300

35

2020&21 17232 19300

2021&22 18216 20200

dkykarj esa fo|qr ekax ds iz{ksfir vkadM+ksa esa ifjorZu gksus dh fLFkfr esa mDr y{;ksa esa ifjorZu laHko gSA

vkifRr ¼7½

varjkZT;h; fo|qr iz.kkyh ¼ISTS-1 djksM+ ls

gSA

mRrj ¼7½

varjkZT;h; fo|qr iz.kkyh ¼ISTS

varjkZT;h; iz.kkyh ds gh varxZr ekuh tk;sxh rFkk mlij Hkh varjkZT;h; fo|qr

ikjs"k.k] ds izHkkj gh ykxw gksaxs tks fd ikjsf"kr fo|qr dh ek=k ij gh fuHkZj gksaxsA blds foijhr bu ifj;kstukvksa gsrq i`Fkd ikjs"k.k O;oLFkk ds

fuekZ.k dh ykxr dk Hkkj] vfrfjDr :i ls mi;ksxdrkZvksa@miHkksDrkvksa dks ogu djuk iM+ ldrk gSA

vkifRr ¼8½

e-iz-

A

mRrj ¼8½

e-iz-

fopkjk/khu ugha gSA rFkkfi] izLrkfor iwathxr O;; ;kstuk ds varxZr :- iz.kkyh lfEefyr

gS ftlesa ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh dh 400 dsOgh] 200 dsOgh] 132 dsOgh ykbZuksa ij vks-ih-th-MCY;w-

iz.kkyh ds LFkkfir gksus ij yht izfØ;k ls okf.kfT;d ykHk izkIr djus ds fodYiksa ij leqfpr dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk laHko gksxkA

vkifRr ¼9½

fctyh ds varjkZT;h; ikjs"k.k gsrq ikWoj fxzM vkWQ bafM;k }kjk vxys 5 o"kksZa dh leku vof/k esa dkSu&dkSu lh ubZ ikjs"k.k

[email protected] izLrkfor gSa rFkk muls fctyh izkIr djus gsrq fdu ikjs"k.k ykbZuksa@fo|qr mixg LFkkfir djuk vko” ;d gS] dk fooj.k

mYysf[kr ugha gSA

mRrj ¼9½

varjkZT;h; ikjs"k.k gsrq ikWoj fxzM }kjk LFkkfir fd;s tkus okyh [email protected] dk vf/kdkfjd fooj.k nsuk laHko ugha gSA rFkkfi]

400 dsOgh ykbZu rFkk dqN 220 dsOgh ykbZu½ ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu layXud&c ¼Annexure-B½ esa n”

36

vkifRr ¼10½

;kfpdk ds iSjk 7-5 esa mYys[k gS fd Hkkjr ljdkj dh xzhu buthZ dkWfjMksj ;kstuk ds rgr yxHkx :-

;kstuk vijkaifjd ÅtkZ L=ksrksa ls yxHkx 4100 esxkokWV fo|qr ds varkZjkT;h; o varZjkT;h; ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh LFkkfir djus gsrq izLrkfor gSA

orZeku esa miyC/k lksyj ÅtkZ ,oa lksyj ÅtkZ ds vykok

:i ls vko” ;d

fjuq,cy ÅtkZ nkf;Ro ¼RPO½ dk 100% ls T;knk dk ikyu fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% :-

dks egaxh fctyh ds :i esa Hkqxruk iM+sxkA jhok ftys esa izLrkfor ek= 750 esxkokWV {kerk ds lksyj fo|qr ?kj gsrq ikjs"k.k dh vR;f/kd

egaxh O;oLFkk O;kogkfjd izrhr ugha gksrh g

mRrj ¼10½

Hkkjr ljdkj dh xzhu buthZ dkWfjMksj ifj;kstuk ds rgr yxHkx :- 2100 djksM+ dh ikjs"k.k ;kstuk gsrq Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk :- 840

djksM+ dk vuqnku ¼Grant½ Lohdr fd;k x;k gS tks -840

djksM+½ dk _.k teZuh ds ds-,Q-MCY;w- -

jgh gSA bl izdkj Hkkjr ljdkj rFkk e-iz-ljdkj }kjk uodj.kh; ÅtkZ dks nh xbZ izkFkfedrk o egRo ds ifjizs{; esa] nh?kZdkyhu i;kZoj.kh;

j

ikjs"k.k izHkkj dk Hkkj dkQh de gksxk rFkk ifj;kstuk dh ykHkkFkhZ uodj.kh; ÅtkZ bdkbZ;ksa ls ikjs"k.k iz.kkyh ds mi;ksx gsrq ekuuh;

r vkSj

nh?kZdkyhu y{;ksa ds lkFk bl ifj;k

fM;k ¼,l-bZ-lh-

vkbZ-½ }kjk LFkkfir

vko”

L=ksrksa ij fuHkZjrk de gksxhA

vkifRr ¼11½

-9889-

bR;kfn ds en esa yxHkx :-2000 ¼nks gtkj djksM+½ izfro"kZ fu;r izHkkj dk Hkkj c<+ tk;sxk tks fd var

egaxh fctyh ds :i esa Hkqxruk iM+sxkA

mRrj ¼11½

- 9889-

vi{kj.k vkfn½ esa dqy vfrfjDr Hkkj ek= yxHkx :- 800 djksM+ vuqekfur gS u fd :i;s 2000 djksM+ izfro"kZ] tks fd ikjs"k.k {kerk esa o`f)

Hkkj

mi;ksxdrkZvksa@miHkksDrkvk

ls ijh{k.k fd;k tkrk gS rFkk fdlh Hkh vuko” ;d O;; dks vekU; dj fn;k tkrk gS ,oa ikjs"k.k izHkkj ds fu/kkZj.k gsrq tkjh fd;s x;s

fofu;[email protected] d

laxr] mi;ksxdrkZ@miHkksDrkvksa dh vifjgk;Z

” ;drkvksa dks fuEure laHko foRrh; Hkkj ds lkFk iw.kZ djus esa l{ke gSA vr% ekuuh; vk;ksx ls fouez fuosnu gS fd vkifRrdrkZ dh