contribution of skin dendritic cells to epicutaneous immunotherapy (epit) in food … · 2020. 6....

18
Contribution of skin dendritic cells to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in food allergy EAACI 2020 Digital Congress Léo Laoubi CIRI INSERM U1111 Thesis directors: M.VOCANSON - J.-F. NICOLAS LYON - France

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Contribution of skin dendritic cells to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT)

    in food allergy

    EAACI 2020

    Digital Congress

    Léo Laoubi

    CIRI – INSERM U1111

    Thesis directors: M.VOCANSON - J.-F. NICOLAS

    LYON - France

  • 2

    Disclosure

    Type Company

    Employment full time DBV Technologies

    Research Grant (P.I., collaborator or consultant; pending and received grants)

    DBV Technologies

    Ownership interest (stock, stock-options, patent or intellectual property

    DBV Technologies

    In relation to this presentation, I declare the following, real or perceived conflicts of interest:

    A conflict of interest is any situation in which a speaker or immediate family members have interests, and those may cause a conflict with the current presentation.Conflicts of interest do not preclude the delivery of the talk, but should be explicitly declared. These may include financial interests (eg. owning stocks of a related company, having received honoraria, consultancy fees), research interests (research support by grants or otherwise), organisational interests and gifts.

  • Skin or gut

    3

    Introduction: Pathophysiology of food allergy

    Lymphnode

    Sensitization phase Elicitation phase

    Plasma cell

    B cell

    Th2 CD4+

    IgE

    DC maturation and migration

    Anaphylaxis

    Peripheral tissues

    Mast cell

    basophil

    allergen

    Inflammatory mediators(histamine, PAF, MCPT-7)

    • IgE-dependent disease

    • Th2 environment

    • There is a need for efficacious and safedesensitization protocols

    LC

    cDC1 cDC2

  • 4

    Introduction: Mechanisms of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT)

    Clinical Aim: - To re-introduce tolerance to an allergen

    Immunological Aim: - Induce tolerogenic skin DCs

    Method: - Daily application of low dose allergen

    Mechanisms: - Treg activation

    - Immune deviation (Th2 vs Th1; IgE vs IgG)Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

    - 1 patch per day- 1 to 3 years

  • 5

    Introduction: Mechanisms of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT)

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

    LCs

    cDC1

    XCR1+ CD103+/-langerin+IRF8+

    cDC2

    SIRPα+ CD11b+/-F4/80+IRF4+

    Langerin+EpCAM+CD11b+SIRPα+

    = CD141+

    = LC

    = CD1c+

    Guilliams M, Ginhoux F. et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2014

  • 6

    Thesis project : Objective

    ➢Aim of the study :➢Characterize the contribution of skin

    DC subsets to the desensitizationprocess

    ➢ Perspectives :➢ Improve EPIT efficacy by targeting DC

    subsets

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

  • 7

    Mouse model used in the study

    Mice = C57BL/6JAllergen = Ovalbumin

    2 s.c. OVA/Alum + i.n. OVA(21 days)

    Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) :OVA-patch 48h per week

    during 8 weeks

    Sensitizedmice

    Naïve mice

    ➢ Skin DC subsets:

    ❑ Uptake of the allergen❑ Migration to dLN❑ Activation status❑ Ability to activate Teff/Treg❑ Contribution to the efficacy of

    desensitization

    1 3 8 patches

    To follow OVA+DC : last patch contains OVA-fluorochrome

    Epidermis

    Dermis

    Allergen

    (OVA-A488)

    LangerinDioszeghy V. et al, JI, 2011

  • 8

    Result Ia: All DC subsets uptake the allergen in the skin

    Skin collected 48h after the 1st, 3rd, 8th patchs

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    Analysis by Flow cytometry

    *p

  • 9

    Result Ib: Activation status of DC is constant in the skin

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    Analysis by Flow cytometry

    11 0 0 2

    11 0 0 3

    MF

    I C

    D8

    6 o

    n O

    VA

    +L

    C,

    cD

    C2

    or

    cD

    C1

    pe

    r

    8m

    m s

    kin

    1 patch

    3 patchs

    8 patchs

    LC cDC2 cDC1

    Data are representative of two experiments.

    Skin collected 48h after the 1st, 3rd, 8th patchs

  • 10

    Result IIa: All DC subsets migrate constantly towards dLN

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    Analysis by Flow cytometry

    11 0 0 1

    11 0 0 2

    11 0 0 3

    11 0 0 4

    #O

    VA

    +L

    C,

    cD

    C2

    or

    cD

    C1

    pe

    r b

    LN

    1 patch

    3 patchs

    8 patchs

    LC cDC2 cDC1

    Data are representative of two experiments.

    dLN collected 48h after the 1st, 3rd, 8th patchs

  • 11

    Result IIb: Activation status of migratory DC is modulated with EPIT

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    dLN collected 48h after the 1st, 3rd, 8th patchs

    Analysis by Flow cytometry

    0

    11 0 0 4

    21 0 0 4

    31 0 0 4

    MF

    I C

    D8

    6 o

    n

    OV

    A+

    LC

    ,

    cD

    C2

    or

    cD

    C1

    pe

    r b

    LN

    * ,$* $

    1 patch

    3 patchs

    8 patchs

    LC cDC2 cDC1

    Data are representative of two experiments.

  • Result IIIa: LC activated less Teff in vitro after EPIT treatment

    12

    ProliferationFoxP3- CD44+ OT-II T cells

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    dLN collected 48h after the 1st, 3rd, 8th patchs

    4-days coculture with

    OT-II CD4+ cells

    OVA+DC sort

    *p

  • Result IIIb: LC activated more Treg in vitro after EPIT treatment

    13

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    Th2 CD4+ Plasma cell

    Mast cellbasophil

    TGF-b

    ProliferationFoxP3+ OT-II T cells

    *p

  • 14

    Take-home messages

    EPIT profoundly modulates the activation status ofmigratory dendritic cell subsets.

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

  • 15

    Take-home messages

    EPIT profoundly modulates the activation status ofmigratory dendritic cell subsets.

    EPIT-induced Langerhans cells prime more TREG andless TEFF .

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

  • 16

    Take-home messages

    EPIT profoundly modulates the activation status ofmigratory dendritic cell subsets.

    EPIT-induced Langerhans cells prime more TREG andless TEFF .

    Langerhans cells, but not cDC1, are required for theefficacy of desensitization by EPIT. (data not shown)

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

  • 17

    Perspectives

    EPIT profoundly modulates the activation status ofmigratory dendritic cell subsets.

    EPIT-induced Langerhans cells prime more TREG andless TEFF .

    Langerhans cells, but not cDC1, are required for theefficacy of desensitization by EPIT. (data not shown)

    What is the role of cDC2 in desensitization in vivo?

    What are the key receptors or molecular pathwaysinvolved in tolerogenic properties of LCs ?

    Lymphnode

    FoxP3+ Treg

    epidermis

    dermis

    LC

    cDC1cDC2

    Allergen-containing Patch

    DESENSITIZATION

    Th2 CD4+Plasma

    cell

    Mast cell

    basophil

    TGF-b

    ?

  • Centre

    International

    de Recherche

    en Infectiologie

    Thank you for

    your attention